Abstract
In order to clarify the role of Gnathostoma turgidum as an etiological agent involved in human gnathostomiasis in Mexico, establish the taxonomic identity of the advanced third-stage larvae (AdvL3), and contribute to the knowledge of its life cycle, experimental host infections, examination of potential natural hosts, and morphological comparisons were carried out. Examination of ten species of potential hosts at San Pedro las Playas and Tres Palos Lagoon in Guerrero state, Mexico revealed that two (Kinosternon integrum and Rana zweifeli) were infected by 15 AdvL3 of G. turgidum. A specific identity was obtained comparing these larvae with those recovered from hosts experimentally infected. The AdvL3 measured 1.6 mm in length, with two cervical papillae (both in 12th row) and an excretory pore on the 19th row. The average of cephalic hooklets, from first to fourth row, was 30.8, 34.0, 36.7, and 39.6, respectively. This is the first record of AdvL3 of G. turgidum in America, and it represents a significant contribution for the understanding of the life cycle of this species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Thirteen species of the genus Gnathostoma Owen 1836 are considered as valid records. Six were recorded in Europe (from species coming from Asia): Gnathostoma spinigerum Owen 1836, Gnathostoma hispidum Fedchenko 1872, Gnathostoma doloresi Tubangui 1925, Gnathostoma nipponicum Yamaguti 1941, Gnathostoma vietnamicum Le-Van-Hoa 1965, and Gnathostoma malaysiae Miyazaki and Dunn 1965; the other seven were identified in America: Gnathostoma sociale Leidy 1858, Gnathostoma turgidum Stossich 1902, Gnathostoma procyonis Chandler 1942, Gnathostoma miyazakii Anderson 1964, Gnathostoma americanum Travassos 1925, Gnathostoma binucleatum Almeyda-Artigas 1991, and recently Gnathostoma lamothei Bertoni et al. 2005.
Except for G. malaysiae, there are detailed descriptions of advanced third-stage larvae (AdvL3) for all the species mainly distributed in Asia. However, for the species registered in America, descriptions have been documented only for G. procyonis (Ash 1962) and G. binucleatum (Almeyda-Artigas 1991; León-Règagnon et al. 2002). For G. turgidum, descriptions are based only on the adult stage (Stossich 1902; Travassos 1925) and occasional reports in Mexico (Lamothe et al. 1998; Almeyda-Artigas et al. 2000). Due to lack of information on AdvL3, its life cycle is poorly known (León-Règagnon et al. 2002; Kifune et al. 2004).
Gnathostomes follow a three-host life cycle with a copepod as the first intermediate host harboring the development of the second larval stage and a carnivorous mammal as the definitive host (Almeyda-Artigas et al. 2000). Since there is no record in America on the infection of fish with G. turgidum AdvL3, it may be possible for the definitive host to acquire the infection by drinking water containing copepods infected with early third stage (EaL3). Although this is not a common means of infection, it has been observed (Golovin 1956) that the presence of a second intermediate host is not required in G. hispidum. The aim of this paper was to clarify the life cycle of G. turgidum, describing the AdvL3 for the first time, and to provide key information about its life cycle.
Materials and methods
Specimens were collected during February and June 2000 and September 2001 at San Pedro las Playas and Tres Palos Lagoon in the state of Guerrero, Mexico (16°41′ to 16°50′ N and 99°37′ to 99°47′ W). The search for G. turgidum AdvL3 was carried out by examining muscle and liver of different organisms (Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves, and Mammalia). The muscle layer was separated and sliced and every slice was pressed between two glass plates (8.5 × 11.0 × 0.5 cm) and examined under a stereo-microscope. The livers were digested with artificial gastric juice (7 g pepsin in 10 ml HCl/1,000 distilled water) during 4 h at 40°C to harvest any larvae overlooked. After digestion, the resulting liquid was examined using a stereo-microscope.
The process for obtaining the experimental AdvL3 began with cyclopoid copepods experimentally infected with second stage larvae (L2) obtained from the eggs of a female extracted from an opossum (Didelphis virginiana), following the procedure established by Almeyda-Artigas et al. (1995). Subsequently, the copepods infected with EaL3 were utilized for infecting per os different second intermediate hosts: Pisces—guppies Poeciliopsis gracilis (30), nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (30); Amphibia—northern leopard frogs Rana pipiens (5) and rana montezume Rana montezumae (1), toads Bufo sp. (2); and Mammalia—white mice Mus musculus (3). These organisms were purchased in a local market and kept under appropriate conditions. The hosts were euthanized at regular intervals and their musculature and viscera were examined by stereo-microscopy in order to determine the number of larvae considering days post-infection (DPI). Five young opossums were born and maintained in the laboratory for infection purposes; they showed no evidence of parasite eggs in their feces. One opossum was fed 30 guppy fish P. gracilis, which were infected with copepods with EaL3, on the assumption that they were infected with AdvL3 over 30 DPI. The other four opossums received the copepods infected with EaL3 orally using a catheter. They were relaxed using Rompum® and killed with a lethal dose of Anestesal® injected in their hearts.
The recovered larvae were fixed in hot 70% ethanol and cleared in Amann lactophenol. They were studied on temporary wet mounts on glass slides and later stored in 70% ethanol. All measurements are given in micrometers, unless otherwise stated, and they are presented as a range, followed by the mean ± SD in parentheses. Photomicrographs were obtained using a Kodak Technical Pan black and white film. Specimens were deposited at the “Colección Helmintológica de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco (CHUAMX)”, Mexico City, Mexico as follows: CHUAMX-G255 (four larvae from K. integrum), CHUAMX-G475 and 476 (11 larvae from R. zweifeli), CHUAMX-G342, 357, 387–389 (532 larvae from R. pipiens), CHUAMX-G416 (three larvae from R. montezumae) CHUAMX-G384-386, 305, 308, 315, 321, 334–335 (15 larvae from Poecilopsis gracilis), CHUAMX-G310 (11 larvae from Bufo sp.), and CHUAMX-G340, 358–359 (seven larvae from M. musculus). Pisces were identified according to Espinosa-Pérez et al. (1993); Amphibia and Reptilia following Flores-Villela and Canseco-Marquez (2004), and Hillis and Willcox (2005), Hillis (2007), Aves as specified by AOU (1998), and Mammalia following Emmons and Feer (1997). The infection parameters utilized are those proposed by Bush et al. (1997).
Results
Natural host
A total of 396 organisms, from ten vertebrate species, were examined. Only two species were found naturally infected with AdvL3 of G. turgidum: one turtle K. integrum, with four larvae located in the musculature, and three of the five frogs, R. zweifeli, infected showing eight and two parasites and one parasite, respectively. All larvae were found encysted in the musculature. The prevalence was about 60%, the intensity 1–8, the mean intensity 3.6, and the abundance 2.2. Moreover, two frogs were infected with 55 and 26 AdvL3 of G. binucleatum, respectively. Each of the eight remaining species tested positive for AdvL3 of G. binucleatum (data not shown); the 390 individuals consist of 322 “popoyote” Dormitator latifrons (Pisces: Eleotridae), 17 “charra” Cichlasoma trimaculatum (Pisces: Cichlidae), 37 Poecilia butleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae), three toads Bufo marinus (Amphibia: Anura), one Thamnophis valida (Reptilia: Colubridae), four brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis (Aves: Pelecanidae), five great egret Ardea alba (Aves: Ardeidae), and one striated heron Butorides striata (Aves: Ardeidae).
Experimental host
The AdvL3 were extracted from every experimentally infected organism; their number varied according to the species of the hosts. The highest infection parameters were registered in amphibians (Table 1). Only those collected from frogs were found to be surrounded by a fibrous cyst. In general terms, when fish were infected, the infection “disappeared” quickly, in contrast to the frog, R. pipiens, where it remained up to 279 DPI showing intensities from 23 to 419.
All the opossums experimentally infected via copepods were negative to AdvL3 or immature forms after 90–180 DPI. In contrast, two worms were recovered and isolated 135 DPI from the liver of the opossum infected through fish (one of the worms was an AdvL3 and the other was molting to the juvenile stage). The cuticle shed from the molting worm is of the AdvL3, whereas the new cuticle completed beneath is identical to that of the adult (unpublished data), showing also the same arrangement of the cephalic bulb hooklets and body spines. Moreover, the worm possesses genital papillae and spicules. Hence, they were adults (Imai and Hasegawa 2001).
Descriptions
There were no significant differences between the AdvL3 of G. turgidum obtained from natural and experimental hosts. However, a slight increase in the size was observed in those specimens obtained naturally. This may be attributed to the density of the parasite population on the host.
Advanced third-stage larvae
Based on 11 AdvL3 extracted from R. zweifeli. Body is 1,530–2,007.4 (1,670.2 ± 127.8) long and 134.6–160.4 (140.8 ± 7.5) wide. Cuticle is covered with small spines arranged in 182–202 (188.6 ± 7.1) transverse rows over the entire body. Esophagus is 579.4–722.2 (648.0 ± 50.3) long and 69.4–85.7 (80.8 ± 4.8) wide, occupying 35.7–42.7% (38.9 ± 2.4) of body length. The four cervical sacs extend back 302.9–435.0 (350.0 ± 43.7) long in average, occupying 45.2–63.5% (54.0 ± 5.4) of the esophagus length. Two cervical papillae, the left located at 10–14 (11.7 ± 1.4) and the right at 11–14 (12.0 ± 0.9) rows of the body, excretory pore is at 15–22 (19.7 ± 2.0) rows behind head bulb. One caudal papilla located at 408.0–742.6 (563.5 ± 129.3) to posterior extremity. Genital primordium at 979.2–1,154.6 (1,083.3 ± 65.2, n = 7) occupying 60.4–71.6% (66.7 ± 3.6) of body length. Tail is 24.4–40.8 (29.2 ± 5.5) long. Cephalic bulb is 36.7–65.0 (46.6 ± 8.0) long and 97.9–118.3 (110.3 ± 5.8) wide (Fig. 1a). The number of cephalic hooklets from rows 1 to 4 were 26–34 (30.8 ± 2.8), 29–38 (34.0 ± 2.7), 29–43 (36.7 ± 3.6), and 33–42 (39.6 ± 2.7), respectively. The hooklets in the fourth row are smaller than those located in the three previous rows, which show the same size (Fig. 1b). They all show a sharp point like the claw of a cat. Completely developed larvae were found inside a fibrous cyst, 0.6 mm in diameter (Fig. 1c). The encysted larva is small and shows a stumpy appearance, except the intestine, which is light brown; the body is colorless. It has no colored liquid in the body cavity.
Molting worm
The worm is covered by a double cuticle; on the outer cuticle, four transverse rows of hooklets were observed on the cephalic bulb, similar to those shown at AdvL3 stage (Fig. 2a). The inner cuticle is covered by nine complete and one incomplete transverse rows of hooklets on the cephalic bulb and multidentates body spines densely distributed which are overlapped in the anterior body and single in the posterior body (Figs. 2b, c), as it occurs in adult stage (unpublished data). Body is 8,249.72 long by 499.72 wide. Cephalic bulb is 179.52 long by 367.2 wide. Esophagus is 1,765.14 long by 290.16 wide, occupying 40% of the body length. One cervical papilla was observed in the 16th row of the cuticle present in the AdvL3, and the other one in the 11th row of the juvenile cuticle. The four cervical sacs are 701.22, 693.16, 733.46, and 701.22 long; the distal extreme is noticeably wider. On the caudal extreme, the loose molt is 692.58 long, with single-tipped hooklets. Tail 163.2 long (Fig. 2d).
Discussion
On the basis of general morphology, the position of the cervical papilla and the excretory pore, the shape and number of hooklets in the rows of the cephalic bulb, and the amount of transverse striations are specific characteristics on the identification of the species of Gnathostoma at the larvae level (Miyazaki 1954; Koga et al. 1994; Akahane et al. 1994). The AdvL3 of Gnathostoma have two cervical papillae (but most published records of AdvL3 report only one). In G. binucleatum, the papilla is located between rows 12 and 13, while G. turgidum shows both papillae between rows 9 and 14 (12.0). Considering these intervals, there is an evident overlapping between these species, thus making it difficult to differentiate between them using this criterion. However, the position of the excretory pore presents a key character for distinguishing G. turgidum from G. binucleatum. On average, the excretory pore in G. binucleatum is located in row 28, while in G. turgidum, it appears on rows 19–25 (22.0). Moreover, the average number of transverse rows of cuticular spines is less than 200. This is another good criterion for distinguishing this species from G. binucleatum. An evident difference between G. binucleatum and G. turgidum is the lower quantity of hooklets in the latter, which present an average of seven hooklets on the four rows of the cephalic bulb; meanwhile, there are no convincing differences between G. turgidum and G. procyonis (Table 2). However, the main difference between the American species of Gnathostoma is the smaller size of G. turgidum, which is about two or three times smaller than G. binucleatum and G. procyonis, and the hooklets in the fourth row of the cephalic bulb are smaller than those present in the three previous rows, which, in the case of G. turgidum, have the same size (Fig. 1b). In contrast, as it can be observed in Fig. 3 of Almeyda-Artigas et al. (1994), the hooklets from G. binucleatum show the same size in all the rows of the head bulb. Furthermore, the colorless characteristic of the body of living AdvL3 in G. turgidum and the lack of colored liquid, may be considered as another relevant characteristic for separating this species from G. binucleatum whose larvae have a conspicuously dark brownish alimentary tract and a celomic fluid deep bloodred throughout its length (Almeyda-Artigas et al. 1994). Because the AdvL3 of G. lamothei has not been obtained in experimental or natural conditions yet, it is not possible to make a comparison.
Among the species of Gnathostoma, G. hispidum is the only one capable of producing an AdvL3 when the definitive host drinks water containing infected copepods (Golovin 1956). The results obtained from this research support the existence of a second intermediary host in the life cycle of G. turgidum, mainly based on: (1) AdvL3 recovered from naturally infected frogs of R. zweifeli which may act as second intermediary host that acquired the infection by consuming infected copepods during its tadpole phase; (2) the AdvL3 recovered from naturally infected turtle K. integrum which may act as a paratenic host that acquired the infection when it consumed tadpoles, frogs, or small fish; (3) the development of AdvL3 to juvenile stage in the liver of their definitive host; and (4) the negative results to the experimental infection of the opossums using copepods infected with EaL3.
In this sense, the role of the amphibians as intermediary hosts on the life cycle takes the place of the most important intermediary host which, in other species, is performed by fish. This assessment relies on the fact that there are no records of fish in the published findings of G. turgidum AdvL3 from Tres Palos Lagoon (León-Règagnon et al. 2000; Martínez-Salazar and León-Règagnon 2005), low Papaloapan River basin (Lamothe-Argumedo et al. 1989; Almeyda-Artigas 1991; Almeyda-Artigas et al. 1994), Pantanos de Centla, Tabasco (Kifune et al. 2004), lagoons and lake in southern Sinaloa (Díaz Camacho et al. 2002, 2003), and Laguna de Agua Brava in Nayarit, Mexico (León-Règagnon et al. 2002; Álvarez-Guerrero and Alba-Hurtado 2007). Moreover, the larvae reported in these publications do not fit, in taxonomical terms, with those described in the current paper.
Lamothe-Argumedo and Osorio-Sarabia (1998) report fishes, amphibians, reptilians, and birds from Mexico as intermediary and paratenic hosts of Gnathostoma spp. AdvL3. These authors state that the AdvL3 present differences in the number of cephalic hooklets by row, on the larval intestinal nuclear pattern, and on the extension of the armed cuticular surface. Consequently, they conclude that there is a great difference between these larvae and those of G. binucleatum (Almeyda-Artigas 1991); however, based on the existence of a plurispecific complex responsible for human gnathostomiasis, they decided to report these organisms as Gnathostoma sp. In light of the current research, we consider that the differences observed by Lamothe-Argumedo and Osorio-Sarabia (1998) on the AdvL3 are due to intraspecific differences of G. binucleatum and not because of interspecific differences. Furthermore, thus far, there is no evidence of the participation of birds in the life cycle of G. turgidum. On the other hand, recovering an adult from an opossum in the experimental infection using infected fish cannot be conclusive regarding this method of infection; therefore, this finding does not confirm that it occurs in natural conditions. The high seasonality of the adult stage in stomach and in the liver found in this research in the definitive host is associated with the synchronized recruitment of AdvL3 during the mating season of frogs (unpublished data). It supports the assertion that the frogs and not the fish are the second intermediate host.
In Mexico, the human gnathostomiasis has been attributed to AdvL3 of G. binucleatum (Almeyda-Artigas 1991; Almeyda-Artigas et al. 2000; León-Règagnon et al. 2002). Although Vidal-Martínez et al. (2001) have suggested that G. turgidum is also involved in Mexican human cases, these authors do not provide evidence that support this statement. Because most of the human reports in Mexico are linked to the ingestion of raw fish, we consider that G. turgidum is not responsible for the human gnathostomiasis in this country. Thus, the possibility of G. turgidum AdvL3 producing a larva migrans-type syndrome must be related to the ingestion of raw or undercooked frog meat.
Our evidence shows that the life cycle of G. turgidum begins when eggs are passed with feces of the definitive host into water. Once the eggs are in contact with the water, the development of the first-stage larva (L1) occurs. Upon hatching, a rapidly moving L2 develops while retaining the sheath. The cuticle smoothens and forms a spine-like structure (larval tooth) on its anterior end which is useful both for exsheathment and for penetrating the wall of the digestive tract of the copepod. Once L2 is ingested by a copepod intermediate host, the larva loses its sheath in the intestine and migrates into the hemocoel of the copepod. After that, the larva grows and molts to EaL3. When the infected copepod harboring the EaL3 is eaten by a second intermediate host, such as a tadpole, the parasite develops into the AdvL3 encysting in the musculature and remaining in this host even when it becomes an adult frog. In the water, before tadpoles metamorphose, the AdvL3 can be transferred to a paratenic host such as turtles. Once out of the water, the offspring frogs pass the infection to the definitive host, the opossum. In the definitive host, the larva necessarily migrates to the liver to achieve its juvenile phase where it remains for a long time; later on, it passes to the stomach where it reaches the adult stage in order to begin a new cycle.
References
Akahane H, Lamothe-Argumedo R, Martínez-Cruz JM, Osorio-Sarabia D, García-Prieto L (1994) A morphological observation of the advanced third-stage larvae of Mexican Gnathostoma. Jpn J Parasitol 43:18–22
Almeyda-Artigas RJ (1991) Hallazgo de Gnathostoma binucleatum n. sp. (Nematoda: Spirurida) en felinos silvestres y el papel de peces dulceacuícolas y oligohalinos como vectores de la gnatostomiasis humana en la cuenca baja del Río Papaloapan, Oaxaca-Veracruz, México. An Instit Cienc del Mar Limnol Univ Nac Autón Méx 18:137–155
Almeyda-Artigas RJ, Acosta-Hernández VA, Alonzo-Díaz L, Castañeda-Sánchez M, Zárate-Ramírez VR (1994) First record of Gnathostoma procyonis Chandler, 1942 in Mexico, and a note on larval G. binucleatum Almeyda-Artigas, 1991 (Nematoda: Spirurida). Res Rev Parasitol 54:93–98
Almeyda-Artigas RJ, Mosqueda-Cabrera MA, Sánchez-Núñez E, Saldaña-Martínez G, Hernández-Viciconti ME, Alcolea-Herrera E (1995) Development of Gnathostoma binucleatum Almeyda-Artigas, 1991 (Nematoda: Gnathostomidae) in its first intermediate experimental host. Res Rev Parasitol 55:189–194
Almeyda-Artigas RJ, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S (2000) ITS-2 rDNA sequencing of Gnathostoma species (Nematoda) and elucidation of the species causing human gnathostomiasis in the Americas. J Parasitol 86:537–544
Álvarez-Guerrero C, Alba-Hurtado F (2007) Estuarine fish and turtles as intermediate and paratenic hosts of Gnathostoma binucleatum in Nayarit, Mexico. Parasitol Res 102:117–122
American Ornitologists’ Union (1998) Check-list of American birds, 7th edn. American Ornithologists’ Union, Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Ash LR (1962) Development of Gnathostoma procyonis Chandler, 1942, in the first and second intermediate hosts. J Parasitol 48:298–305
Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz MJ, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583
Díaz Camacho SP, Willms K, de la Cruz Otero M del C, Nawa Y, Akahane H (2002) Morphology of Gnathostoma spp. isolated from natural hosts in Sinaloa, México. Parasitol Res 88:639–645
Díaz Camacho SP, Willms K, de la Cruz Otero M del C, Zazueta-Ramos ML, Bayliss Gaxiola S, Castro Velásquez R, Osuna Ramírez I, Bojórquez Contreras A, Torres Montoya EH, Sánchez Gonzáles S (2003) Acute outbreak to gnathostomiasis in a fishing community in Sinaloa, Mexico. Parasitol Int 52:133–140
Emmons LH, Feer F (1997) Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
Espinosa-Pérez H, Gaspar Dillanes MT, Fuentes Mata P (1993) Listados Faunísticos de México, III Los Peces Dulceacuícolas Mexicanos. Instituto de Biología, UNAM, México
Flores-Villela O, Canseco-Márquez L (2004) Nuevas especies y cambios taxonómicos para la herpetofauna de México. Act Zool Mex 20:115–144
Golovin OV (1956) The biology of the nematode Gnathostoma hispidum. Dokladi Akademii Nauk SSSR 111:242–244
Hillis DM (2007) Constraints in naming parts of the tree of life. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:331–338
Hillis DM, Wilcox TP (2005) Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol Phylogenet Evol 34:299–314
Imai J, Hasegawa H (2001) Molting of Gnathostoma doloresi (Nematoda: Gnathostomatoidea) in the definitive host. J Parasitol 87:14–18
Kifune T, Lamothe-Argumedo R, García-Prieto L, Oceguera-Figueroa A, León-Règagnon V (2004) Gnathostoma binucleatum (Spirurida: Gnathostomatidae) en peces dulceacuícolas de Tabasco, México. Rev Biol Trop 52:371–376
Koga M, Akahane H, Ishii Y, Kojima S (1994) External morphological of the advanced third-stage larvae of Gnathostoma spinigerum: a scanning electron microscopy. Jpn J Parasitology 43:23–29
Lamothe-Argumedo R, Osorio-Sarabia D (1998) Estado actual de la gnatostomiasis en México. An Instit Cienc del Mar Limnol Univ Nac Autón Méx 69:23–37
Lamothe-Argumedo R, Medina-Vences RM, López-Jiménez S, García-Prieto L (1989) Hallazgo de la forma infectiva de Gnathostoma sp., en peces de Temascal, Oaxaca, México. An Instit Cienc del Mar Limnol Univ Nac Autón Méx 60:311–320
León-Règagnon V, García-Prieto L, Osorio-Sarabia D, Jiménez-Ruiz A (2000) Gnathostomosis in fish from Tres Palos Lagoon. Emerg Inf Dis 6:4
León-Règagnon V, Osorio-Sarabia D, García Prieto L, Akahane H, Lamothe-Argumedo R, Koga M, Messina-Robles M, Álvarez-Guerrero C (2002) Study of the ethiological agent of gnathostomosis in Nayarit, México. Parasitol Int 51:201–204
Martínez-Salazar EA, León-Règagnon V (2005) Confirmation of Gnathostoma binucleatum Almeyda-Artigas, 1991, advanced third-stage larvae in Tres Palos Lagoon, Mexico, by morphological and molecular data. J Parasitol 91:962–965
Miyazaki I (1954) Studies on Gnathostoma occurring in Japan (Nematoda: Gnathostomidae). II. Life history of Gnathostoma and morphological comparison of its larval forms. Kyushu Mem Med Sci 5:123–139
Stossich M (1902) Sopra alcuni nematodi della collezione elmintologica del prof. dott. Corrado Parona. Bolletino dei Musei di Zoologia e Anatomia Comparata della R. Universita di Genova 116:1–16
Travassos LP (1925) Contribuçoes para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica Brasileira. 18. Sobre as especies brasileiras do genero Gnathostoma Owen, 1836. Scientia Medica 3:508–517
Vidal-Martínez VM, Aguirre-Macedo L, Scholtz T, González-Solís D, Mendoza-Franco E (2001) Atlas of the helminth parasites of cichlid fish of Mexico. Prha: Academia
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledges Roberto Javier Almeyda Artigas of the “Laboratorio de Sanidad Acuícola y Parasitología Molecular, Departamento El Hombre y su Ambiente, UAM-X, México D.F.”, Mexico who participated in the collection of the material for this research and Edmundo Sánchez Núñez for the critical revision of this paper. The experiments developed and the animal sacrifice carried out met the terms of the International regulations and the Mexican protocols.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosqueda Cabrera, M.Á., Miranda, E.S., Calderón, L.C. et al. Finding advanced third-stage larvae of Gnathostoma turgidum Stossich, 1902 in Mexico from natural and experimental host and contributions to the life cycle description. Parasitol Res 104, 1219–1225 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1318-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1318-4