Abstract
Diuretics are frequently prescribed drugs and help managing several pathological conditions, including acute and chronic kidney disease, nephrotic syndrome, congestive heart failure, ascites, systemic and pulmonary hypertension. Diuretic classes include among others osmotic diuretics and carboanhydrase inhibitors, loop diuretics, thiazides, and potassium-sparing diuretics. In this educational article, we aim at reviewing indications, mechanisms of action, and side effects, as well as basic pharmacokinetics considerations and data on diuretics in children, supporting practicing clinicians in choosing (and understanding the background of) the best-suited diuretic regimen for the individual patient. Newer diuretic classes like vaptans and sodium glucose type 2 cotransporter inhibitors, the recent controversies on hydrochlorothiazide, and the issue of diuretic resistance, will also be briefly addressed.
Conclusion: This educational review offers a didactical overview of diuretics in Pediatrics.
What is Known: |
• Diuretics are frequently prescribed drugs in both adults and children. |
• They increase water and sodium excretion, reducing fluid overload. |
What is New: |
• This article reviews indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, and basic pharmacokinetics facts on diuretics in Paediatrics. |
• It also addresses current issues, like the management of diuretic resistance, the recent controversy on hydrochlorothiazide, and the novel classes vaptans and gliflozins. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Diuretics are widely used drugs in both adults and children [1,2,3]. Over the last years, a diatribe on thiazide diuretics has animated scientific discussions [4], and two new diuretic classes, namely the vaptans [5] and the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors [6], have appeared on the market, stimulating some fresh curiosity. In this concise guide, we aim at reviewing indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, basic pharmacokinetics considerations, and data on diuretics in children, supporting practicing pediatricians in choosing the best diuretic for the individual patient. Additionally, four typical vignettes and four multiple-choice questions are provided as supplementary material.
Indications
Diuretics mainly act through an increase in water and sodium excretion, reducing fluid overload.
Sodium and water retention can derive either directly from volume overload (e.g., acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, nephrotic syndrome, capillary leak states, …) or indirectly from a reduced effective arterial circulating volume and decreased renal perfusion, which triggers a state of hyperaldosteronism (e.g., congestive heart failure, liver failure, nephrotic syndrome) [3] (Table 1).
Acute kidney injury
In acute kidney injury, fluid retention from oliguria or anuria can benefit from diuretic therapy. Due to their efficacy and rapidity of effect, loop diuretics are generally the first choice [7]. They can be combined with thiazides for a stronger natriuresis through distal sodium reabsorption blockade.
It might appear surprising that, in front of an acutely suffering kidney, a forced diuresis turns out to be protective for the kidney, preventing the complications of fluid overload. However, there is a clear pathophysiological rationale for such “renal salvage” strategies [7]. First, by reducing the transporter activity, loop diuretics reduce oxygen and energy consumption in the vulnerable, tubular cells. Second, they increase prostaglandin production, leading to vasodilation, which upregulates renal blood flow. Notably, in acute kidney injury following hypoxia, hypovolaemia, hypotension, and the resulting vasomotor nephropathy, prostaglandins can be critical in supporting glomerular blood flow [8]. Finally, the reduced salt and water reabsorption in the proximal tubule results in increased intratubular urine flow. This helps to dislodge brush border debris after tubular ischemia, thus preventing tubular obstruction [8].
Chronic kidney disease
Chronic kidney disease reflects a constant, often progressive decline of renal function. Uremic complications generally occur when the GFR is < 30 mL/min/1.73m2. This condition progressively leads to a diminished capacity to increase urine output and, with some residual renal function, diuretics can be helpful. Loop diuretics are the first choice and can be combined with thiazides to inhibit the compensatory distal sodium reabsorption [7].
Congestive heart failure
In congestive heart failure (CHF), diuretics aim to decrease extracellular volume overload and to reduce right and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures. In chronic heart failure, diuretic therapy should not be used continuously, but just intermittently to reach euvolemia and relieve symptoms [9, 10].
In heart failure, a decreased cardiac output leads to a blunted effective circulating arterial blood volume, which stimulates the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. That is why, in addition to the pivotal role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), among the diuretic classes, mineralocorticoid antagonists play an important role in heart failure therapy. Additionally, mineralocorticoid antagonists are known to have antifibrotic effects, likely the main mechanism by which, in adults, they demonstrated a mortality benefit as well as reduced hospitalization rates [11].
The duration of a diuretic effect is limited by compensatory mechanisms in more distal parts of the tubule (e.g., in the case of loop diuretics) and by the activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. These features require a careful dose management during the treatment course. Monitoring of weight, potassium levels, and renal function are important, for example before initiation of therapy, approximately 7–14 days thereafter, and following relevant dose adaptations [12].
Nephrotic syndrome, ascites, liver failure
Further edematous states such as nephrotic syndrome are also usually treated with loop diuretics. Thiazides are a secondary option for those cases because of their weaker efficacy, as compared to loop diuretics. However, because of compensatory sodium reabsorption in the distal tubule under chronic loop diuretic use, thiazides are recommended for a prolonged treatment course (starting from an anticipated period of approximately 7–10 days).
In the setting of liver failure, spironolactone is a mainstay of treatment [13]. Diuretics, combined with a dietary salt restriction, are indeed important in the treatment of hepatic cirrhosis- causing ascites. In absence of renal failure, aldosterone antagonists are the first option [13]. In fact, liver failure is characterized by splanchnic vasodilation, with resultant activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system [14].
Systemic arterial hypertension
In arterial hypertension, diuretics are not first-line drugs. However, they can help in decreasing extracellular fluid volume and are probably underused [15]. Thiazides (less prone to distal compensatory mechanisms) are the best diuretic class in this context [16], and are the only diuretic class that has consistently been shown to effectively lower high blood pressure [17]. Interestingly, the anti-hypertensive effect of thiazide diuretics ensues slowly, with most of the response appearing by 4–6 weeks [16]. The addition of spironolactone (both as distal addition and as a potassium-sparing molecule) is frequently used.
Pulmonary hypertension
Pulmonary hypertension may lead, over time, to right ventricular failure. Diuretic treatment can benefit this condition, by reducing liquid retention and optimizing right ventricular preload, as well as by decreasing right and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, even if randomized controlled trials are not available.
Cerebral oedema and Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (Pseudotumor cerebri)
Post-traumatic cerebral edema is more frequent in children than in adults: a head injury leads to hyperemia and diffuse cerebral swelling, with a subsequent risk of intracerebral hypertension and hemorrhage. Osmotic diuretics increase serum osmolality pulling water out of (cerebral) cells. Furthermore, mannitol also reduces the production of intracerebral fluid [2]. Caution is mandated, obviously, in polytrauma patients, since mannitol can aggravate hypovolemia [2]. Exploiting the same mechanisms, acetazolamide and topiramate (which are, in addition, also weakly analgesic) are used in the therapy of Pseudotumor cerebri [18].
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Although controversial, diuretics are often used also among newborns and infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia to accelerate lung fluid reabsorption [3, 19,20,21].
Dyselectrolytaemias and diabetes insipidus
Taking advantage from their mechanisms of action, diuretics are used to modulate some dyselectrolytaemic states. (1) In hyperkalemia, loop diuretics and thiazides increase potassium excretion (and they are an important armamentarium for hyperkalemia management both in acute and chronic kidney disease). (2) In hypercalcemia, loop diuretics can be used to reduce calcium reabsorption and, therefore, increasing calcium excretion. (3) Conversely, in hypercalciuric states, thiazide diuretics can increase calcium reabsorption and therefore diminish calcium excretion. (4) Also, the acid–base balance can be modulated by diuretics: acetazolamide increases bicarbonate excretion, loop diuretics increase potassium and hydrogen excretion, and aldosterone antagonist increase potassium (and, therefore, hydrogen) reabsorption. (5) Thiazide diuretics induce sodium loss and stimulate proximal tubule water reabsorption and are therefore very effective in the management of diabetes insipidus (“paradoxical antidiuretic effect”).
Mechanisms of action and side effects
After being filtered by the glomerulus, 99% of filtered urine and sodium are reabsorbed along the renal tubule [3]: 60–70% in the proximal tubule, 20–30% in the ascending limb of the loop of Henle, and 5–10% in the distal tubule and collecting duct [3, 22, 23] (Fig. 1). The driving force for sodium reabsorption is the Na+/K+-ATPase, located in the basolateral membrane of tubular cells. On the apical membrane, several transporters and channels help the reabsorption of different ions (Fig. 1).
With the exception of spironolactone, diuretics exert their effect from the tubular lumen, which is reached by glomerular filtration (osmotic diuretics) or tubular secretion (loop diuretics and thiazides). Therefore, in front of a reduced renal function, (1) diuretic concentration at the site of action is reduced and (2) its delivery is slower. This occurs in renal failure, but also in healthy infants. Indeed, glomerular and tubular ontogeny and immaturity are responsible for a delayed onset of action as well as for an increased elimination time and therefore a prolonged effect, especially in the first 2 years of life [2, 24].
The maximal diuretic effect is generally reached after the first dose, while the induced compensatory response decreases the effect of subsequent doses. The more proximal the diuretic action site, the more important this phenomenon is.
Loop diuretics
Loop diuretics are powerful drugs because they block sodium reabsorption in the thick ascending tubule of the loop of Henle (Fig. 1). The most common molecules are furosemide, torasemide, and bumetanide (Table 2). The electrolyte balance is altered, because of the decreased reabsorption of the cations Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ and the anion Cl− (Fig. 1). This mechanism anticipates the known side effects of hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia (Table 3).
Of note, reduced sodium reabsorption in the thick ascending limb of the Henle’s loop leads to increased sodium delivery to the distal and collecting tubules, with a compensatory increase in sodium reabsorption at this location, which is accompanied (for electroneutrality reasons) by an increased potassium secretion [2]. Furthermore, loop diuretics inhibit the Na+/K+/2 Cl− (NKCC) symporter also in the macula densa, thereby stimulating renin secretion and activating the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, which results in increased sodium reabsorption and potassium secretion in the distal tubule [25].
The onset of action is rapid (< 1 h), as it is the reaching of a new steady state. The blockage of a second isoform of NKCC1, present throughout the body and notably in the stria vascularis of the ears, can lead to complications like ototoxicity [1, 25].
The half-lives of most loop diuretics (approximately 1 h for bumetanide, 3 h for furosemide, and 6 h for torasemide [23]) are shorter than their administration intervals, these drugs being typically administered twice a day. Thus, while a loop diuretic dose increases sodium excretion for some hours, this is followed by a period of low sodium excretion: “post-diuretic sodium retention” [25]. With high dietary sodium intake and long (e.g., once or twice a day) dosing intervals of short half-life drugs (like bumetanide or furosemide), the post-diuretic sodium retention might offset the initial natriuretic effect [1, 25].
Upon chronic diuretic administration, a new steady state is rapidly reached, characterized by a combination of increased distal sodium and solute delivery, hypertrophy of the distal nephron, activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and of the sympathetic nervous system [23, 25]. In this new state, sodium input and output are equal, but the set-point is lowered (at a smaller extracellular fluid volume) as compared to baseline [1]. This new equilibrium characterizes the efficacy of a chronic diuretic treatment but also represents the basis for the development of diuretic resistance [25]. Treatment of diuretic resistance is tricky. High-dose diuretics and continuous diuretic infusions have traditionally been used. Recognizing that up to ¾ of diuretic resistance might be due to activation of NaCl transport in the distal nephron [25], a tempting approach is to block NaCl reabsorption in the distal nephron (e.g., with thiazides), the “sequential nephron blockade” approach [23]. Interestingly, also proximally acting drugs, like the carbonic-anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide (which works in the proximal tubule by inhibiting pendrin, a chloride-bicarbonate exchanger) and the new SGLT2 inhibitors have been used with some success [26, 27]. Vaptans can increase diuresis, but it is unclear whether this translates into better outcomes in children [5]. Finally, a recent meta-analysis suggested that, in children with fluid overload, adding aminophylline/theophylline to furosemide may increase urine output and help in achieving a negative fluid balance [28].
Potassium-sparing diuretics
There are two targets for potassium-sparing diuretics: (1) epithelial Na+ channels, directly inhibited by amiloride and triamterene, and (2) the intracellular mineralocorticoid receptor, inhibited by spironolactone and eplerenone (Table 2). Because of their site of action, their efficacy with respect to volume regulation is limited in an otherwise untreated patient (Fig. 1). However, aldosterone antagonists are particularly efficacious in situations of effective intra-arterial volume depletion (only when diuretic treatment is indicated and safe in these patients with already depleted effective fluid volume), i.e., situations, where the mineralocorticoid axis is activated.
Vaptans
The previously mentioned diuretics are “natriuretic,” as they increase sodium and water excretion. On the opposite, vasopressin receptor antagonists, also called aquaretics (like Tolvaptan and Conivaptan), increase water excretion by blocking the vasopressin receptor on tubule cells, leading to dilution of the produced urine [5]. Their use may be interesting in diuretic resistance and, particularly, in front of volume overload concurrent with hyponatremia, as it is sometimes found in heart failure and in some cases of nephrotic syndrome [10, 29]. Vaptans are also proposed in some types of hyponatremia (like the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone). Finally, tolvaptan slows disease progression in adult patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and there is hope to see similar results in children [5].
Sodium glucose transporter type 2 inhibitors
Very recently, SGLT2 inhibitors (or gliflozins) have brought in adult medicine novel approaches in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [30], chronic kidney disease [31], and heart failure [32]. This class of drug exhibits natriuretic and glucosuric properties, inhibiting sodium (> 60%) and glucose (> 90%) reabsorption in the proximal tubule [33] (Fig. 1). Interestingly, they appear to have a more pronounced effect on interstitial fluid than on plasma volume [34], which may be particularly appealing in patients with congestive heart failure [35]. Of note, as opposed to other diuretics, gliflozins appear not to be associated with sympathetic activation and heart rate increase [36]. Intriguingly, besides their role in osmotic sodium handling, SGLT2 inhibitors might also modulate the non-osmotic sodium compartment [34, 37, 38], with potential impact on the endothelial glycocalix and therefore high appeal in heart failure. Their role in children just started to be explored [39,40,41].
Side effects
The side effects of the several diuretic classes mirror their mechanisms of action and are listed in Table 3. A special note deserve the recent concerns on the possibly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers among adult patients on chronic thiazide diuretics [42]. Epidemiological studies based on health registries from Northern Europe suggested an increased incidence of such tumors among elderly patients on long-lasting thiazide therapy and prompted regulatory agencies to issue pertaining warnings. While these drugs have known photosensitizing potential, such epidemiological studies have inherent methodological limitations and deserve confirmation in well-designed observational studies [43]. Furthermore, the extrapolation of such data to children is problematic, since the cumulative dose of both thiazide molecules and ultraviolet exposure is significantly lower in children.
Doses and some basic pharmacokinetics considerations
Accepted dose recommendations and some basic pharmacokinetic data are summarized in Table 4.
Absorption-limited kinetics
The loop diuretics torasemide and bumetanide are rapidly absorbed. While the bioavailability of torasemide is high (> 80% [17]), that of furosemide is lower (on average approximately 50%) [1, 17] and, most importantly, very variable, from approximately 10% to about 90%, depending among others on food consumption, age, and presence of edema [1]. Intriguingly, even if the half-life of furosemide is short, its duration is longer after oral administration, because its absorption can be equal to or even slower than its elimination half-life. This phenomenon is called absorption-limited kinetics and explains the mnemonic name “Lasix®” (the market name of the originator drug): “it lasts for six hours”. This phenomenon is not encountered with torasemide and bumetanide [1].
Dose-concentration and Dose–response curves of loop diuretics, natriuretic threshold
All loop diuretics share similar sigmoid-shaped dose–response curves: no natriuretic effect below a certain threshold (A in Fig. 2), steep, roughly linear increase after having reached that threshold (B in Fig. 2) and, finally, a ceiling effect (plateau phase, box C in Fig. 2), where a further increase in the drug plasma concentration does not lead to any response increase any more [25].
Notably, in edematous states, the absorption is slowed and the diuretic threshold increased [25]. This translates into a limited time during which the diuretic concentration is above the natriuretic threshold. In this situation, the i.v. administration (and even more so the continuous i.v. administration) becomes particularly interesting, since it allows to increase in the time above the diuretic threshold and therefore rise the net diuretic effect (Fig. 3).
Renal excretion versus hepatic metabolism
Furosemide is excreted to approximately 50% unchanged in the urine, with the other half eliminated through glucuronidation, which also mainly takes place in the kidneys. Its half-life is therefore increased in renal disease. It might be interesting to note that also hydrochlorothiazide is mostly excreted as the original compound (without significant metabolism). This happens by active tubular secretion through organic anion transporters 1 (OAT1) and 3 (OAT3) [44].
In contrast, torasemide, which is extensively hepatically metabolized [17], presents a more preserved half-life in acute and chronic kidney disease [1].
Bumetanide takes an intermediate position, as it is metabolized for approximately 40% and excreted unchanged for the remaining 60% [1, 45] (Fig. 4).
Conclusion
Diuretics are frequently used and mainly serve to counteract sodium and water retention, either from volume overload or from hyperaldosteronism subsequent to reduced effective circulating volume. In this review aimed at practicing pediatricians, we reviewed indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, posology, and some clinically relevant pharmacokinetic characteristics of the most frequently used diuretics. Drug classes in the pipeline, like vaptans and gliflozins, were briefly addressed. An understanding of the mechanisms and key pharmacological properties of these drugs is pivotal for their effective and safe use in children.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
References
Ellison DH (2019) Clinical pharmacology in diuretic use. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 14(8):1248–1257. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.09630818
van der Vorst MM, Kist JE, van der Heijden AJ, Burggraaf J (2006) Diuretics in pediatrics : current knowledge and future prospects. Paediatr Drugs 8(4):245–264. https://doi.org/10.2165/00148581-200608040-00004
Guignard JP, Iacobelli S (2021) Use of diuretics in the neonatal period. Pediatr Nephrol 36(9):2687–2695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-021-04921-3
Heymann WR (2019) The expanding saga of hydrochlorothiazide and skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol 80(2):380–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.006
Piffer A, Bianchetti MG, Leoni-Foglia C, Simonetti GD, Milani GP, Lava SAG (2022) Vaptans for oedematous and hyponatraemic disorders in childhood: a systematic literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 88(10):4474–4480. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15367
Dhillon S (2019) Dapagliflozin: a review in type 2 diabetes. Drugs 79(10):1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01148-3
Witte MK, Stork JE, Blumer JL (1986) Diuretic therapeutics in the pediatric patient. Am J Cardiol 57(2):44A–53A. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(86)91006-4
Moghal NE, Shenoy M (2008) Furosemide and acute kidney injury in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93(4):F313-316. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.108860
Kantor PF, Lougheed J, Dancea A, McGillion M, Barbosa N, Chan C, Dillenburg R, Atallah J, Buchholz H, Chant-Gambacort C, Conway J, Gardin L, George K, Greenway S, Human DG, Jeewa A, Price JF, Ross RD, Roche SL, Ryerson L, Soni R, Wilson J, Wong K, Children’s Heart Failure Study Group (2013) Presentation, diagnosis, and medical management of heart failure in children: Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines. Can J Cardiol 29(12):1535–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2013.08.008
Schranz D, Voelkel NF (2016) “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld. Eur J Pediatr 175(4):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2700-3
Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J (1999) The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 341(10):709–717. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199909023411001
Writing committee members, Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 128(16):e240-327. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776
Vogt B, Reichen J (2000) Rationale Diuretikatherapie bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose [Rational diuretic therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis]. Ther Umsch 57(6):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.57.6r.355
Garbuzenko DV, Arefyev NO (2019) Current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites. World J Gastroenterol 25(28):3738–3752. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3738
Burnier M, Bakris G, Williams B (2019) Redefining diuretics use in hypertension: why select a thiazide-like diuretic? J Hypertens 37(8):1574–1586. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002088
Blowey DL (2016) Diuretics in the treatment of hypertension. Pediatr Nephrol 31(12):2223–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3334-4
Knauf H, Mutschler E (1998) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of torasemide. Clin Pharmacokinet 34(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199834010-00001
Babiker MO, Prasad M, MacLeod S, Chow G, Whitehouse WP (2014) Fifteen-minute consultation: the child with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 99(5):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-305818
Bamat NA, Nelin TD, Eichenwald EC, Kirpalani H, Laughon MM, Jackson WM, Jensen EA, Gibbs KA, Lorch SA (2021) Loop diuretics in severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia: cumulative use and associations with mortality and age at discharge. J Pediatr 231:43-49.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.073
Tan C, Sehgal K, Sehgal K, Krishnappa SB, Sehgal A (2020) Diuretic use in infants with developing or established chronic lung disease: a practice looking for evidence. J Paediatr Child Health 56(8):1189–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14877
Segar JL (2020) Rethinking furosemide use for infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol 55(5):1100–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24722
Ferrari P, Frey FJ (2000) Angriffspunkte der Diuretika in der Niere [Pharmacologic action of diuretics in the kidney]. Ther Umsch 57(6):345–350. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.57.6.345
Eades SK, Christensen ML (1998) The clinical pharmacology of loop diuretics in the pediatric patient. Pediatr Nephrol 12(7):603–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004670050514
Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE (2003) Developmental pharmacology–drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med 349(12):1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra035092
Ellison DH, Felker GM (2017) Diuretic treatment in heart failure. N Engl J Med 377(20):1964–1975. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1703100
Tang WHW, Kiang A (2020) Acute cardiorenal syndrome in heart failure: from dogmas to advances. Curr Cardiol Rep 22(11):143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01384-0
Vallon V, Verma S (2021) Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney and cardiovascular function. Annu Rev Physiol 83:503–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-095920
Van Siang Lian Mang P, Hui JC, Tan RSJ, Hasan MS, Choo YM, Abosamak MF, Ng KT (2022) The diuretic effect of adding aminophylline or theophylline to furosemide in pediatric populations: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04655-w. Epub ahead of print
Wilcox CS, Testani JM, Pitt B (2020) Pathophysiology of diuretic resistance and its implications for the management of chronic heart failure. Hypertension 76(4):1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15205
Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Mainou M, Liakos A, Bekiari E, Sarigianni M, Matthews DR, Tsapas A (2013) Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 159(4):262–274. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00007
Neuen BL, Young T, Heerspink HJL, Neal B, Perkovic V, Billot L, Mahaffey KW, Charytan DM, Wheeler DC, Arnott C, Bompoint S, Levin A, Jardine MJ (2019) SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7(11):845–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30256-6
Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Brueckmann M, Ofstad AP, Pfarr E, Jamal W, Packer M (2020) SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet 396(10254):819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9
Braunwald E (2022) Gliflozins in the management of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 386(21):2024–2034. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2115011
Bjornstad P, Greasley PJ, Wheeler DC, Chertow GM, Langkilde AM, Heerspink HJL, Van Raalte DH (2021) The potential roles of osmotic and nonosmotic sodium handling in mediating the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on heart failure. J Card Fail 27(12):1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.07.003
Tang J, Ye L, Yan Q, Zhang X, Wang L (2022) Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on water and sodium metabolism. Front Pharmacol 13:800490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.800490
Delanaye P, Scheen AJ (2021) The diuretic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors: a comprehensive review of their specificities and their role in renal protection. Diabetes Metab 47(6):101285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2021.101285
Titze J (2014) Sodium balance is not just a renal affair. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 23(2):101–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mnh.0000441151.55320.c3
Karg MV, Bosch A, Kannenkeril D, Striepe K, Ott C, Schneider MP, Boemke-Zelch F, Linz P, Nagel AM, Titze J, Uder M, Schmieder RE (2018) SGLT-2-inhibition with dapagliflozin reduces tissue sodium content: a randomised controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol 17(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0654-z
Tamborlane WV et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in children and young adults with type 2 diabetes: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel group, phase 3 study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10(5):341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00052-3
Kula AJ (2022) Considerations and possibilities for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in pediatric CKD. Pediatr Nephrol 37(10):2267–2276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05456-x
Newland DM, Law YM, Albers EL, Friedland-Little JM, Ahmed H, Kemna MS, Hong BJ (2022) Early clinical experience with dapagliflozin in children with heart failure. Pediatr Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02983-0. Epub ahead of print
Pedersen SA, Johannesdottir Schmidt SA, Hölmich LR, Friis S, Pottegård A, Gaist D (2019) Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk for Merkel cell carcinoma and malignant adnexal skin tumors: a nationwide case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol 80(2):460–465.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.014
Kreutz R, Algharably EAH, Douros A (2019) Reviewing the effects of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics as photosensitizing drugs on the risk of skin cancer. J Hypertens 37(10):1950–1958. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002136
Commander SJ, Wu H, Boakye-Agyeman F, Melloni C, Hornik CD, Zimmerman K, Al-Uzri A, Mendley SR, Harper B, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Hornik CP (2021) Best Pharmaceuticals for children act-pediatric trials network steering committee. Pharmacokinetics of hydrochlorothiazide in children: a potential surrogate for renal secretion maturation. J Clin Pharmacol 61(3):368–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1739
Holazo AA, Colburn WA, Gustafson JH, Young RL, Parsonnet M (1984) Pharmacokinetics of bumetanide following intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administrations to normal subjects. J Pharm Sci 73(8):1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600730821
Funding
Dr. Lava is the current recipient of research grants from Fonds de perfectionnement, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Fondation SICPA, Prilly, Switzerland; Fondazione Dr. Ettore Balli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Fondazione per il bambino malato della Svizzera italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland, and Frieda Locher-Hofmann Stiftung, Zürich, Switzerland. Dr. Schaffner is the current recipient of training grants from Fonds de perfectionnement, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland, and Fondation SICPA, Prilly, Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SAGL and SDB conceptualized and designed the study. CZ, supervised by SAGL, performed the literature search. SAGL contributed to data interpretation and critically analyzed and summarized the data. SAGL drafted the initial manuscript. SAGL, CZ, HC, DS, NS, and SDB critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable (narrative review study).
Consent to participate
Not applicable (narrative review study).
Consent for publication
All authors gave their consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Gregorio Milani
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lava, S.A.G., Zollinger, C., Chehade, H. et al. Diuretics in pediatrics. Eur J Pediatr 182, 2077–2088 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04768-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04768-2