Abstract
Some markers of angiogenic endothelial cells are emerging as targets of cancer therapy. The present study compares the expression of CD105 with that of other endothelial markers in all tissue layers during the development of colon cancer. We immunohistochemically analyzed the expression of the colon adenoma–carcinoma sequence by endothelial cells using a panel of eight endothelial markers. We examined sections from endoscopic mucosal resection and surgical resection of tubular adenoma (n=31), carcinoma in adenoma (n=11), and adenocarcinoma (n=34). Cylindrical cores were punched out from donor paraffin blocks of normal mucosa adjacent to tumors, from tumor lesions of mucosa, submucosa, muscularis propria, subserosa, and serosa, and from lymph node metastases. CD31 (PECAM-1) was universally expressed in the blood vessels of adenoma–carcinoma lesions as well as in normal mucosal vessels (80–95%), with no significant differences. In contrast, cancer-associated blood vessels (up to 80%) and cancer cells themselves expressed high levels of CD105. In normal mucosa, CD105 was weakly expressed in endothelial cells of capillaries (≦21%), and significant differences in its expression in endothelial cells between the normal mucosa and adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma were found. Flt-1, Flk-1, transforming growth factor-β1, transforming growth factor-β receptor II, and CD44 were strongly expressed in the cancer cells but were not expressed in the blood vessels. Vascular endothelial growth factor was expressed at <30% in the blood vessels of adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and carcinoma. Moreover, this study provided evidence that CD105 was expressed exclusively in endothelial blood vessels by double immunostaining of CD105 and D2-40. The present study shows that de novo blood vessels of colon cancer specifically express CD105. These findings provide the basis for novel antiangiogenic cancer therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Colon cancer is a widespread human disease that is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide [19]. Most colorectal carcinomas are considered to originate from precursor lesions (adenomas) [18]. Adenoma is thought to progress to carcinoma over many years because of multiple accumulated molecular alterations [25].
Angiogenesis is an important step in the process of cancer growth. It promotes metastatic spread by providing the means for cells to detach from the primary tumor and to travel in the bloodstream to distant metastatic sites. Moreover, the most important prognostic factor for colon cancer is the depth of cancer invasion. Cancer is always accompanied by angiogenesis as it grows and invades the surrounding tissues, and angiogenesis is a complex of endothelial cell growth and stem cell differentiation brought about by interactions of growth factors and their ligands.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent mitogen and cytoprotective factor for vascular endothelial cells, and its receptors (VEGFR-1/Flt-1 and VEGFR-2/Flk-1), which are expressed exclusively by endothelial and neoplastic cells, have been documented [6, 11, 26].
CD105 is a receptor for transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and TGF-β3, and it modulates TGF-β signaling by interacting with TGF-β receptor I (TGF-βRI) and/or TGF-β receptor II (TGF-βRII) [22]. CD105 is predominantly expressed on cellular lineages within the vascular system and is overexpressed on proliferating endothelial cells. Several studies indicate that CD105 is involved in the development of blood vessels and that it represents a powerful marker of neovascularization of various types of tumors, including colon cancer [1, 4, 8, 9, 17, 28]. CD105 is emerging as a prime vascular target of antiangiogenetic cancer therapy [10]. We reported that the predominantly CD105-positive microvessel count of polyploid-type early colon cancer is higher than that of nonpolyploid-type early cancer [20]. However, to our knowledge, the expression of CD105 in vessels of lesions invading all the various tissue layers during the colon adenoma–carcinoma sequence (adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma) has not been compared with that of other endothelial markers.
The use of tissue microarrays in colorectal carcinoma has been validated by analyzing the immunohistochemical expression of some markers [12]. We therefore compared the expression of CD105 in several hundred target spots with that of other endothelial markers in all tissue layers during the development of colon cancer using tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry. To specifically differentiate the vascular expression of CD105 and CD31 as pan-endothelial markers, we compared them using double immunofluorescence. Additionally, to exclude the idea that the CD105-stained vessels represent lymphatic vessels, we performed a double immunohistochemistry of CD105 and D2-40, which has been reported as a new selective marker for lymphatic endothelial markers [13]. We also compared the vascular expression of the antibody between the normal mucosa adjacent to tumors and the neoplastic lesions.
Materials and methods
Tumor samples
Between 1998 and 2003, 36 consecutive resected colon samples and 40 endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) samples from 76 patients (42 men, 34 women; age range 39–95 years) with colonic tumors were obtained from the files of the Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University and its affiliated hospital. The specimens were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, and the tumor was diagnosed from observations of sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histological subtypes were classified according to the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma [29]: 31 tubular adenomas (10 mild, 10 moderate, and 11 severe atypias), 11 carcinomas in adenoma (focally expressed cancer cells in adenoma), and 34 adenocarcinomas (16 well, 16 moderate, and 2 poor differentiations). Table 1 shows the details of the patients and their diseases.
Tissue microarray
To identify the targets of core samples, we examined the microscopic features of each layer of invasion on slide sections and marked the locations to be punched out (Fig. 1).
Under a light microscope, we selected and marked areas of normal mucosa and representative tumor from each layer on H&E slides and corresponding paraffin blocks. The tissue microarrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA) was used to prepare cylindrical cores of 1.5 mm in diameter. Cores were punched out from donor blocks and placed in recipient blocks.
Two array blocks of 258 cores were derived from the normal mucosa adjacent to tumors (n=76), from tumor lesions from mucosa (n=76), submucosa (n=33), muscular propria (n=31), subserosa (n=25), and serosa (n=6), and from lymph node metastases (n=11). The depth of each core depended on the extent of tumor cell invasion (Table 1). The array blocks were then incubated for 30 min at 37°C to improve adhesion between the cores and the paraffin of the recipient block.
Double immunostaining
For double immunofluorescence, the tissue array slides were deparaffinized and soaked in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 90°C for 40 min for antigen retrieval. The samples were treated with 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) to inhibit nonspecific antibody binding and then were incubated with the primary murine monoclonal antibody CD105 for 1 h at 37°C. After washing thrice with PBS (pH 7.2), the samples were incubated with fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled secondary rabbit polyclonal antibody against murine immunoglobulin G (IgG) for 30 min at 37°C. To inactivate the primary and secondary antibodies, the samples were heated in the citrate buffer at 90°C for 15 min. This treatment made it possible to carry out the second immunoreaction with the monoclonal antibody. For the second immunoreaction, the same procedure was repeated; the samples were treated with 10 mg/ml BSA, incubated with another primary antibody CD31, and then incubated with rhodamine-labeled secondary antibody. After washing with PBS, FITC-labeled and rhodamine-labeled samples were examined using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX60, Tokyo, Japan). To detect nonspecific antibody binding, control sections were incubated with either normal murine or rabbit serum or PBS instead of primary antibody. No staining was observed in these control samples.
For double immunohistochemistry, after incubation with the first primary antibody CD105 and then washing with PBS, the alkaline-phosphatase-labeled secondary rabbit polyclonal antibody against murine IgG was reacted for 30 min at 37°C and visualized with the BCIP/NBT substrate system (Dako, USA), which produces a blue purple color. After microwave heating in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; pH 8) for 5 min, the specimens were incubated with the second primary antibody (D2-40, mouse monoclonal antibody; Nichirei, Japan) for 3 h. The same procedure with the first step was repeated, and the expression of the second antibody was visualized with the New Fuchsin Substrate Kit (Nichirei), which produces a red color.
Immunohistochemistry
Sections from each array block were cut at a thickness of 4 μm. Briefly, the slides were placed at 60°C for 15 min, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated in a series of graded alcohols. Thereafter, antigen retrieval was performed by microwave heating in EDTA (pH 8) for 6 min (for CD105, mouse monoclonal clone 4G11), then the slides were autoclaved (121°C) in EDTA (pH 8) for 5 min using the appropriate antibodies (for CD44, mouse monoclonal MH114; VEGF, mouse monoclonal clone C-1; Flt-1, rabbit polyclonal C-17; Flk-1, rabbit polyclonal N-931; TGF-β1, rabbit polyclonal V; and TGF-βRII, rabbit polyclonal L-21) and with proteinase K (Dako, Japan) for 10 min (for CD31, mouse monoclonal clone JC70A; Table 2). The sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed, and incubated with goat antimouse or goat antirabbit Igs (EnVision Peroxidase; Dako) for 30 min at room temperature.
Histological assessment
Images of an immunostained section (×200) were captured on a computer (Windows XP, 7000 cl; Fujitsu) with a Nikon ACT-1 software by using a Nikon digital camera (DXm 1200) attached to an operator light microscope (Nikon Eclipse, E600). Assessment was performed on live images from each core. Endothelial staining of at least one blood vessel from each core was considered as a positive expression of the blood vessels. Staining of ≧10% of the neoplastic or normal epithelial cells was considered positive in neoplastic or normal epithelial cells. Positive immunoreactivity was graded as weak (+), moderate (++), and intense (+++).
Statistical analysis
Differences in the vascular endothelial expression of an antibody between a normal mucosa and neoplastic mucosal adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma from each layer were analyzed using the t test of independent samples. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Double immunofluorescence staining revealed that CD31 (PECAM-1) was universally expressed in small blood vessels and capillaries. On the other hand, CD105 was rarely expressed in normal mucosal vessels; however, in the cancer tissue, CD105 was intensely expressed in newly formed numerous capillaries, which reflect angiogenesis (Fig. 2). After the demonstration that CD105 was specifically expressed in angiogenetic blood vessels, the detailed relationship between markers of blood vessels and tumor histology was assessed by immunohistochemistry.
CD31 was universally expressed in the blood vessels of all layers of adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma lesions (Fig. 3), as well as in those of normal mucosal blood vessels (80–95%) (Fig. 5). Vascular endothelial expression of CD31 in normal and neoplastic mucosal layers of adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma from all layers did not significantly differ (Fig. 5). CD105 was intensely expressed in vascular endothelial cells of neoplastic mucosal adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and various layers of adenocarcinoma at a level corresponding to the depth of cancer invasion. The CD105 expression was also seen in the cytoplasm of neoplastic epithelial cells (Fig. 3). CD105 was expressed by 30 and 54% of vascular endothelial cells in the neoplastic mucosa of adenoma and carcinoma in adenoma, respectively. Moreover, CD105 was also expressed in endothelial cells of blood vessels in neoplastic mucosa (65%), submucosa (72%), muscular propria (80%), subserosa (68%), serosa (50%) of adenocarcinoma, and lymph node metastasis (45%). In contrast, only 12, 18, and 21% of blood vessels in normal mucosal layers of adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma, respectively (Fig. 5), weakly expressed CD105, and its expression in normal epithelial cells was not found. Unlike CD31, vascular endothelial expression of CD105 significantly differed between the normal and neoplastic mucosal layers of adenoma, cancer in adenoma, adenocarcinoma lesions (p<0.05, p<0.05, and p<0.0001, respectively; Fig. 5). Additionally, by using a double immunostaining of CD105 and D2-40, our results demonstrated that CD105 was expressed exclusively in the endothelium of newly formed blood vessels within and around tumors from all layers, and no double-positive staining in the same vessels was found (Fig. 4).
VEGF was expressed on vascular endothelial cells (<30%) and in the cytoplasm of normal and neoplastic cells (<50%) throughout all layers of adenoma, cancer in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma. Vascular expression of VEGF was lost in the serosa of adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastasis. The expression of VEGF in the vascular endothelium did not significantly differ between normal and neoplastic mucosal layers of adenoma, cancer in adenoma, or adenocarcinoma (Fig. 5).
CD44 was not expressed in the vascular endothelium in normal tissues and in all layers of adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma, and was intensely expressed in the neoplastic cell membrane (Table 3). Flt-1 (cytoplasm and cell membrane), Flk-1 (cytoplasm and nuclei), TGF-β1 (cytoplasm), and TGF-βRII (cytoplasm and nuclei) were intensely expressed in neoplastic cells in all layers of adenoma, cancer in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma, but not in endothelial cells (Table 3).
Discussion
Endoglin (CD105), a cell membrane glycoprotein, was obviously upregulated in endothelial cells in de novo blood vessels of various tumors compared with those in normal tissues [3, 15, 16, 22, 27]. As far as we know, no study has compared the endothelial expression of CD105 with a lymphatic endothelium marker to exclude the idea that the CD105-stained vessels represent lymphatic vessels. The present study provides evidence that CD105 was expressed exclusively in the endothelium of newly formed blood vessels compared with D2-40, which was reported as a selective lymphatic endothelial marker [13]. Our results show no double-positive staining of CD105 and D2-40 in the same vessels (Fig. 4). CD105 is expressed in vascular endothelial cells of polypoid-type early colon cancer [20]. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to identify CD105 expression at levels corresponding to the depth of cancer invasion in the colon adenoma–carcinoma sequence (adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and lymph node metastasis).
Angiogenesis always accompanies the development of cancer and metastasis, and the depth of tumor invasion of the colon wall determines the stage of cancer, which is a useful prognostic indicator and basis for the selection of appropriate therapy. We therefore considered that the expression of CD105 in each layer of the colon should be defined and compared with that of other angiogenetic markers. In this respect, we showed that CD105 was expressed at high levels in vascular endothelial cells in de novo blood vessels of the adenoma–carcinoma of the colon and was weakly expressed (≦21%) in blood vessels of the normal mucosal layer. CD105 expression significantly differed between the normal mucosa and the corresponding layers of adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma (p<0.05, p<0.05, and p<0.0001, respectively), whereas CD31 and VEGF expression did not differ among them. This finding supports that of Akagi et al. [1], who showed that the expression of CD105 significantly differed from low-grade to high-grade adenoma and to carcinoma, whereas the MVD for a pan-endothelial marker (CD34) did not differ in the colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Moreover, when compared with CD31 and VEGF, CD105 was more intensely expressed in de novo microvessels (Fig. 3).
A higher expression of both VEGF and CD105 (MVD) correlates with a deeper invasion and lymph node metastasis in gastrointestinal cancer [30]. Our study also shows that CD105 expression is related to the depth of invasion, but not to VEGF expression (Fig. 3).
Flk-1 is expressed in the colon [24], lung [14], and prostate [2], and Flt-1 is expressed in pancreatic cancer [23, 26]. In contrast, we found that Flk-1 and Flt-1 were not expressed in vascular endothelial cells, whereas Flt-1 was intensely expressed in the cytoplasm and membrane of neoplastic cells and Flk-1 was found in the cytoplasm and nucleus of neoplastic cells.
Several studies have shown that CD31 is expressed in blood vessels in normal tissues, as well as in cancer tissues [1, 5, 7]. We found that 80–95% of the normal mucosa adjacent to the tumor and all layers in adenoma, carcinoma in adenoma, and adenocarcinoma expressed CD31.
One report describes that CD44 is expressed in the vascular endothelium [21]. However, we discovered a weak expression in lymphatic endothelial cells (data not shown) and an intense expression in normal and neoplastic cell membranes, but none in vascular endothelial cells.
The cytoplasm and nucleus of neoplastic cells expressed high levels of TGF-β1 and its receptor (TGF-βRII), whereas vascular endothelial cells expressed none.
These results confirm that CD105 was specifically expressed in de novo blood vessels of colon cancer.
References
Akagi K, Ikeda Y, Sumiyoshi Y, Kimura Y, Kinoshita J, Miyazaki M, Abe T (2002) Estimation of angiogenesis with anti-CD105 immunostaining in the process of colorectal cancer development. Surgery 131:S109–S113
Becker CM, Farnebo FA, Iordanescu I, Behonick DJ, Shih MC, Dunning P, Christofferson R, Mulligan RC, Taylor GA, Kuo CJ, Zetter BR (2002) Gene therapy of prostate cancer with the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor Flk1. Cancer Biol Ther 1:548–553
Burrows FJ, Derbyshire EJ, Tazzari PL, Amlot P, Gazdar AF, King SW, Letarte M, Vitetta ES, Thorpe PE (1995) Up-regulation of endoglin on vascular endothelial cells in human solid tumors: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res 1:1623–1634
Cheryl AB, Jennifer JS, Miao J, Jill MJ, Jordan LM, Mary EM (2000) Endoglin expression as a measure of microvessel density in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 96:224–228
Dales JP, Garcia S, Carpentier S, Andrac L, Ramuz O, Lavaut MN, Allasia C, Bonnier P, Charpin C (2004) Long-term prognostic significance of neoangiogenesis in breast carcinomas: comparison of Tie-2/Tek, CD105, and CD31 immunocytochemical expression. Hum Pathol 35:176–183
Faviana P, Boldrini L, Spisni R, Fontanini G et al (2002) Neoangiogenesis in colon cancer: correlation between vascular density, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and p53 protein expression. Oncol Rep 9:617–620
Feng D, Nagy JA, Pyne K, Dvorak HF, Dvorak AM (2004) Ultra-structural localization of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM-1, CD31) in vascular endothelium. J Histochem Cytochem 52:87–101
Fonsatti E, Sigalotti L, Arslan P, Altomonte M, Maio M (2003) Emerging role of endoglin (CD105) as a marker of angiogenesis with clinical potential in human malignancies. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 3:427–432
Fonsatti E, Altomonte M, Arslan P, Maio M (2003) Endoglin (CD105): a target for anti-angiogenetic cancer therapy. Curr Drug Targets 4:291–296
Fonsatti E, Altomonte M, Nicotra MR, Natali PG, Maio M (2003) Endoglin (CD105): a powerful therapeutic target on tumor-associated angiogenetic blood vessels. Oncogene 22:6557–6563
Greenaway J, Connor K, Pederson HG, Coomber BL, LaMarre J, Petrik J (2004) VEGF and its receptor, Flk-1/KDR, are cytoprotective in the extravascular compartment of the ovarian follicle. Endocrinology 145:2896–2905
Jourdan F, Sebbagh N, Comperat E, Flejou JF (2003) Tissue microarray technology: validation in colorectal carcinoma and analysis of p53, hMLH1, and hMSH2 immunohistochemical expression. Virchows Arch 443:115–121
Kahn HJ, Marks A (2002) A new monoclonal antibody, D2-40, for detection of lymphatic invasion in primary tumors. Lab Invest 82:1255–1257
Kawaguchi T, Yamamoto S, Kudoh S, Goto K, Wakasa K, Sakurai M (1997) Tumor angiogenesis as a major prognostic factor in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res 17:3743–3746
Kumar P, Wang JM, Bernabeu C (1996) CD105 and angiogenesis. J. Pathol 178:363–366
Li C, Gardy R, Seon BK, Duff SE, Abdalla S, Ranehan A, O'Dwyer ST, Haboubi N, Kumar S (2003) Both high intratumoral microvessel density determined using CD105 antibody and elevated plasma levels of CD105 in colorectal cancer patients correlate with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer 88:1424–1431
Li C, Guo B, Bernabeu C, Kumar C (2001) Angiogenesis in breast cancer: the role of transforming growth factor and CD105. Microsc Res Tech 4:437–449
Nasi A, Boulware D, Kaiser HE, Coppola D (2004) Flat and polyploid adenocarcinomas of the colorectum: a comparative histomorphologic analysis of 47 cases. Hum Pathol 35:604–611
Nicholl ID, Dunlop MG (1999) Molecular markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1267–1269
Okada K, Satoh T, Fujimoto K, Tokunaga O (2004) Interaction between morphology and angiogenesis in human early colorectal cancers. Pathol Int 54:490–497
Price EA, Coombe DR, Murray JC (1998) Endothelial CD44H mediates adhesion of a melanoma cell line to quiescent human endothelial cells in vitro. Int J Cancer 65:513–518
Duff SE, Li C, Garland JM, Kumar S (2003) CD105 is important for angiogenesis: evidence and potential applications. FASEB J 17:984–992
Siemann DW, Chaplin DJ, Horsman MR (2004) Vascular-targeting therapies for treatment of malignant disease. Cancer 100:2491–2499 [review]
Takahashi Y, Kitadai Y, Bucana CD, Cleary KR, Ellis LM (1995) Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlates with vascularity, metastasis, and proliferation of human colon cancer. Cancer Res 55:3964–3968
Volgestein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319:525–532
Von Marschall Z, Cramer T, Hocker M, Burde R, Rosewicz S (2000) De novo expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human pancreatic cancer: evidence for an autocrine mitogenic loop. Gastroenterology 119:1358–1372
Wang JM, Kumar S, Pye D, van Agthoven AJ, Krupinski J, Hunter RD (1993) A monoclonal antibody detects heterogeneity in vascular endothelium of tumours and normal tissues. Int J Cancer 54:363–370
Wilkstrom P, Lissbrant IF, Stattin P, Egevad L, Bergh A (2002) Endoglin (CD105) is expressed on immature blood vessels and is a marker for survival in prostate cancer. Prostate 51:268–275
Yasutomi M (ed) (1999) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. Kanehara, Tokyo
Yu JX, Zhang XT, Liao YQ, Zhang QY, Chen H, Lin M, Kumar S (2003) Relationship between expression of CD105 and growth factors in malignant tumors of gastrointestinal tract and its significance. World J Gastroenterol 9:2866–2869
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minhajat, R., Mori, D., Yamasaki, F. et al. Endoglin (CD105) expression in angiogenesis of colon cancer: analysis using tissue microarrays and comparison with other endothelial markers. Virchows Arch 448, 127–134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-0062-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-0062-8