Abstract
The Drosophila melanogaster hematopoietic organ, called lymph gland, proliferates and differentiates throughout the larval period. The lymph gland of the late larva is comprised of a large primary lobe and several smaller secondary lobes. Differentiation into two types of hemocytes, plasmatocytes and crystal cells, is confined to the outer layer (cortical zone) of the primary lobe; the center of the primary lobe (medullary zone), as well as the secondary lobes, contain only proliferating prohemocytes. A small cluster of cells located at the posterior tip of the primary lobe serves as a signaling center (PSC) that inhibits precocious differentiation of the medullary zone. The larval lymph gland is stabilized by layers of extracellular matrix (basement membranes) that surround individual hemocytes, groups of hemocytes, as well as the lymph gland as a whole. In this paper, we investigated the events shaping the lymph gland in the early pupa. The lymph gland dissociates and hemocytes disperse during the first 12 h after puparium formation (APF), leaving behind empty husks of basement membrane. Prior to lymph gland dissociation, cells of the medullary zone differentiate, expressing the early differentiation marker Peroxidasin (Pxn), as well as, in part, the late differentiation marker P1. Cells of the PSC spread throughout the pupal lymph gland prior to their dispersal. Cells of the secondary lobes undergo a rapid phase of proliferation that lasts until 8 h APF, followed by expression of Pxn and dispersal. These hemocytes do not express P1, indicating that they disperse prior to full maturation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The hemolymph (blood) of D. melanogaster contains three types of mature hemocytes, the most prevalent of which is the plasmatocyte. The plasmatocyte carries out a phagocytic function, engulfing dead cells, debris, and pathogens. The second most prevalent cell type is the crystal cell, which aids in the innate immune response as well as in wound healing by carrying out melanization. The third and most rare hemocyte type is the lamellocyte. The lamellocytes are large flat cells, which encapsulate and neutralize objects too large to be phagocytized (Evans et al. 2003; Crozatier and Meister 2007; Krzemien et al. 2010). Lamellocytes are not seen in embryos or adults and are rarely found in larvae. However, upon immune challenge, via parasitization with a wasp egg, the number of lamellocytes increases substantially (Lanot et al. 2001; Sorrentino et al. 2002).
Blood formation in Drosophila takes place during two phases, the early embryo, and the larva. In the embryo, a subset of head mesodermal cells become specified as plasmatocytes and crystal cells (Tepass et al. 1994; Lebestky et al. 2000; Alfonso and Jones 2002); these cells play a role during embryonic development, and form the pool of differentiated, motile cells of the larval hemolymph. The second phase of blood formation takes place in the lymph gland, a hematopoietic organ that develops in close association with the cardio-vascular system (dorsal vessel) and that originates from the thoracic mesoderm of the embryo (Poulson 1950; Rugendorff et al. 1994; Mandal et al. 2004). In the late embryo and early larva, the lymph gland forms a small, bilaterally paired cluster of undifferentiated blood progenitors (prohemocytes). Prohemocytes proliferate rapidly during the larval period. In the late larva, the lymph gland is comprised of a pair of large primary lobes, which have developed from the small lymph gland primordium; to this, a series of secondary and tertiary lobes, located posterior to the primary lobes, have been added (Jung et al. 2005). Hemocyte maturation takes place in the primary lobes in a tightly regulated spatio-temporal pattern. The center of the primary lobes, called medullary zone, contains prohemocytes that remain in a slowly proliferating, undifferentiated state throughout the larval period. Cells of the medullary zone are considered “stem cell-like” and are maintained in this state by the posterior signaling center (PSC) via a number of signaling pathways (Mandal et al. 2007; Krzemien et al. 2007). The medullary zone is surrounded by an outer cortical zone, in which cells differentiate, expressing a number of molecular and morphological markers of plasmatocytes and crystal cells (and, in cases of injury or infection, lamellocytes).
Under normal conditions, cells of the lymph gland remain together and do not disperse into the hemolymph. In that regard, Drosophila appears to present an exception, since in other insects, including other Dipterans, hemocytes of the lymph gland are constantly given off into the hemolymph (Akai and Sato 1971; Hinks and Arnold 1977; Nakahara et al. 2003). In Drosophila, only infection or injury (Rizki and Rizki 1992; Sorrentino et al. 2002; Agaisse et al. 2003) triggers increased proliferation and maturation in the lymph gland and causes the release of hemocytes into circulation. In the absence of infection/injury, the lymph gland of Drosophila dissociates during the early pupal stage (Lanot et al. 2001). By 15 h after puparium formation (APF), all lobes of the lymph gland have dissolved. Adult Drosophila have no compact blood forming organ. This may be an adaptation to the short life span of fruit flies; it is also possible that undifferentiated, pluripotent hemocyte progenitors remain active in circulation or in the form of small clusters of cells which so far have eluded detection.
The process of lymph gland dissociation in the pupa has been analyzed electron microscopically (Lanot et al. 2001), but many questions have remained unanswered. For example, do cells of the lymph gland all differentiate before moving out into the hemolymph? Can one detect differences in the rate of maturation/dissociation between primary and secondary lobes? Do the zones of the primary lobe remain intact until the very end, when lymph gland dissociation starts to occur? What happens to the reticular extracellular matrix that surrounds individual hemocyte progenitors of the larval lymph gland? To address these questions, we have employed the use of a combination of hemocyte specific markers, as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in order to analyze the stages of lymph gland dissociation.
Materials and methods
Antibodies
Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry include: α-Mouse-Antennapedia (1:4) (Developmental Hybridoma Bank), α-rat BrdU (1:100) (Abcam), α-Mouse-GFP (1:400) (Sigma), α-Rabbit-GFP (1:2,000) (Molecular Probes), α-Mouse-L1 (1:100) (Kurucz et al. 2003), α-Mouse P1 (1:100) (Kurucz et al. 2007), α-Mouse-Peroxidasin (1:500) (Nelson et al. 1994), and α-Rabbit-ProPo (1:1,000) (Muller et al. 1999). All secondary antibodies are from Jackson Immunoresearch and were used at 1:200 (FITC and CY3), 1:100 (CY5), and 1:500 (ALEXA).
Fly lines
Protein trap line, ZCL1973X (Kelso et al. 2004), which labels Trol expression with GFP was used. G147, a GFP trap line associated with a microtubule protein (Morin et al. 2001) was also used.
Pupal fixation
Pupae were pinned dorsal side up, and their pupal case removed. Pupal lymph gland was carefully exposed before a fixative (1:3 of 37% formaldehyde: 1× PBS) solution was applied to the sample for 20 min. Pupae were then washed three times in 0.1% PBT for 15 min each. Immunohistochemistry was then carried out.
Immunohistochemistry
Samples were washed with a solution of 0.1% PBT three times for 15 min each at room temperature while rotating. Samples were then blocked for 30 min in a solution of 10% NGS made in 0.1% PBT. Samples were then placed in a 1° antibody solution made in 10% NGS and left to rotate overnight at 4°C. Samples were then washed and blocked as described above and placed in a 2° antibody conjugated to a fluorescent marker. Samples were then left in 2° antibody to rotate overnight at 4°C. Samples were washed as described above and mounted in vectashield containing a 1:500 concentration of Toto-3-iodide (invitrogen).
BrdU incubation, fixation, and staining
Dissected pupal lymph glands were placed in a solution of 75 μg/ml of BrdU. Lymph glands were allowed to incubate in BrdU solution for 40–60 min on ice. Tissue was fixed in a 1:3 solution of 37% formaldehyde: 1× PBS for 20–30 min. Samples were washed four times for 10 min each in 0.3% PBST and blocked in 10% NGS for 30 min. Samples were incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4°C on rotator. Samples were washed four times, for 10 min each, in 0.3% PBST. After blocking for 30 min in 10% NGS, samples were incubated in 2° antibody overnight at 4°C. After washing in 0.3% PBST twice for 10 min, tissue was fixed for a second time in a 1:3 solution of 37% formaldehyde and 1× PBS for 15 min, followed by washing in 0.3% PBST three times for 10 min each. DNA was denatured for 30 min by adding 2 N HCl. After three washes in 0.3% PBST, 10 min each, samples were blocked for 30 min. Samples were incubated in anti-BrdU antibody overnight at 4°C. Samples were washed with 0.3% PBST four times for 10 min each, blocked for 30 min in 10% NGS, and incubated in 2° antibody overnight at 4°C. This was followed by washing samples with 0.3% PBST four times for 10 min. Samples were mounted in Vectashield.
EM fixation
Fixative solution contained 0.2 mL EM phosphate buffer A (0.2 M NaH2PO4), 0.8 mL EM phosphate buffer B (0.2 M Na2HPO4), 0.4 mL 16% EM grade formaldehyde, 0.125 mL 50% glutaraldehyde, and 0.475 mL DI water; kept on ice. Dissected tissue was fixed for 24 h at 4°C, followed by washing five times for 10 min in phosphate buffer (1.0 mL EM phosphate buffer A, 4.0 mL EM phosphate buffer B, 5.0 mL DI water). Postfixation was carried out in 1% osmium tetroxide (0.5 ml DI water, 0.5 ml 4% osmium tetroxide and 1 ml phosphate buffer 0.2 M pH 7.3) at 4°C, in dark, for 60 min. Washing was done four times for 10 min in DI water. Tissue was dehydrated through acetone series at 4°C (50%, 70%, and 96% acetone for 10 min each; 100% acetone three times for 10 min each). For embedding, tissue was placed in 1:3 epon:acetone mixture for 2 h at room temperature while rotating, placed in 1:1 epon:acetone mixture for 3 h at room temperature while rotating, placed in 3:1 epon:acetone mixture overnight at room temperature, and placed in epon overnight. Blocks were polymerized for 16 h at 60°C in flexible plastic mold.
Confocal
BioRad Radiance 2000 confocal microscope with LaserSharp 2000 acquisition software, ×40 oil immersion lens was used.
Results
Lymph gland hemocytes express differentiation markers prior to dissociation
In order to determine whether all the cells of the lymph gland differentiated before their release and dispersal, and at what time point this occurred, we analyzed animals at white prepupal stage and 2, 4, 8, and 10 h APF, using the ZCL1973X (Trol-GFP protein trap) line that expresses GFP in the lymph gland (Fig. 1a–k). As a differentiation marker for plamatocytes, we labeled dissected lymph glands with anti-peroxidasin (Pxn; early differentiation marker) and P1 (late differentiation marker); in addition, Propo, a marker for differentiated crystal cells, was also used (Jung et al. 2005).
In late larvae, expression of Pxn is restricted to the cortical zone (Fig. 1a). Around 4 h APF, we observe sporadic Pxn signal in the medullary zone (Fig. 1d), and by 8 h, most, if not all cells of the pupal lymph gland are Pxn-positive (Fig. 1g). At the same time, the structural distinction between a medullary and cortical zone breaks down. Thus, in late larvae, the medullary zone is distinguished from the cortical zone by a denser Trol-positive ECM reticulum, as well as a higher packing density of hemocytes (Fig. 1a). By 8 h APF, the strong expression of Trol in the medullary zone has become reduced and Trol expression looks more homogeneous throughout what remains of the primary lymph gland lobes (Fig. 1g).
The expression of P1 is temporally offset relative to Pxn. By 4 h APF, when many central (medullary) cells are already Pxn-positive, P1 is still restricted to the cortical zone (Fig. 1e). However, by 8 and 10 h APF, P1-positive cells are clustered throughout the lymph gland (Fig. 1h, k, respectively).
Crystal cells, labeled by Propo, form a small population of hemocytes that are evenly scattered throughout the cortical zone of late larvae (Fig. 1c). In the pupal lymph gland, crystal cells are almost entirely absent; we only saw small groups of 1–3 crystal cells in the periphery of lymph gland lobes of pupae aging up to 2 h APF (Fig. 1f). Our findings indicate that hemocytes differentiate before they move out of the lymph gland; crystal cells appear to be the first cells to leave.
The expression of differentiation markers presented above is paralleled by morphological signs of differentiation, as documented by TEM. Undifferentiated blood progenitors of the larval medullary zone are characterized by a higher nucleus–cytoplasm ratio than hemocytes in the cortical zone (Fig. 2a). They also lack the filiform processes and membrane ruffles typical for mature hemocytes. In the 4 h pupa, some cells with the characteristics of undifferentiated blood progenitors still persist (Fig. 2b), but mature plasmatocytes predominate throughout the lymph gland (Fig. 2e–f).
An Antennapedia-positive PSC persists in the early pupa
The PSC of the late larva forms a bilateral cluster of cells located at the posterior margin of the primary lobes (Fig. 3a). Antennapedia (Antp)-positive cells at numbers comparable to those typical for the larval PSC persisted until 10 h APF, immediately before dissociation of the lymph gland. After that, Antp expression is no longer associated with the dorsal vessel, indicating that PSC cells, along with other hemocytes, disperse into the hemolymph. Interestingly, in 8, 10, and 12 h pupae, Antp-positive cells appeared more widely distributed over the small remainder of the lymph gland (Fig. 3b–d, respectively), rather than forming a tight cluster as in the larva. This could indicate that hemocytes in the hours immediately prior to dispersal mix more freely than at the larval stage.
The secondary lobes undergo a growth spurt prior to lymph gland dissociation
The secondary and higher order lobes of the larva do not generally express any of the differentiation markers found in the cortical zone of the primary lobes, as most of the cells are undifferentiated (Jung et al. 2005). This prompted the question whether hemocytes of the secondary lobes (which dissociate at the same time as the primary lobes) disperse as undifferentiated blood progenitors or go through an accelerated phase of maturation prior to dispersal. Using the markers Pxn and P1, we observed that secondary lobe hemocytes do initiate differentiation during a short time interval: from 4 h APF onward, most, if not all, cells of the secondary lobes are Pxn-positive (Fig. 4a–c). However, expression of the differentiation marker P1 is never initiated (Fig. 4f), indicating that dispersal of the secondary lobe cells takes place before they have terminally differentiated. It should be noted that, as in the larva, expression of the crystal cell marker Propo is never observed in the secondary lobes (data not shown).
We noted that the secondary lobes transiently increase in size between the 4 and 8 h pupal time points, before diminishing by 10 h (Fig. 4a–c). To assess whether cell division was in fact taking place, 4 and 8 h pupal lymph glands were incubated with BrdU. For both time points, high numbers of Brdu-positive cells were seen in the secondary lobes (Fig. 4d–e, respectively); by contrast, no BrdU incorporation takes place in the primary lobes during this time interval (data not shown).
The reticular ECM during hemocyte dispersal
During the larval period, blood progenitors surround themselves with a thin lamella of extracellular matrix. It contains collagen and laminin (Jung et al. 2005; Krzemien et al. 2010), as well as perlecan (in Drosophila: Trol; Fig. 1a). Electron microscopically, the ECM lamella is approximately 30–50 nm thick and has a granulated appearance (Fig. 2c). Characteristically, ECM lamellae do not adhere tightly to the cell surface, but leave an open space of variable diameter (Fig. 2d). Trol-driven GFP visualizes impressively the ECM of the larval lymph gland. In the medullary zone, each cell or small groups of cells are surrounded by ECM lamellae; in the cortical zone, many lamellae have disappeared, and larger clusters of (differentiated) hemocytes occupy a common “chamber” which is bound by ECM (Fig. 1a–c).
As the lymph gland dissociates in the pupa and hemocytes disperse in the hemolymph, they leave behind the ECM lamellae. As shown in Fig. 5a, b, the lymph gland of a 10-h pupa consists of empty shells of folded ECM lamellae, almost devoid of hemocytes. What this implies is that hemocytes, rather than digesting the ECM, push through gaps or only digest small, localized areas in the ECM lamellae as they move out of the lymph gland. A figure suggesting a hemocyte in the process of “escaping” is shown in Fig. 2g–g′. We were not able to determine for how much longer, after 12 h APF, the lymph gland-associated ECM remains. The finding that ECM stays behind after the cells that produced it have left is unexpected, since in other tissues that have been studied, cell migration or dispersal is preceded by the disappearance (digestion) of the ECM. For example, in case of the wing, a thick, multilayered membrane underlies the epithelium in the 6-h pupa (Srivastava et al. 2007). During eversion of the wing, which is accompanied by large scale cell movement, this ECM membrane all but disappears. The lymph gland associated ECM may have special properties that render it particularly stable, so that it is able to persist in the absence of cells. Another difference between lymph gland and wing metamorphosis, that may be relevant, is that hemocytes merely have to break through the surrounding ECM lamella, after which they become freely motile cells, whereas the wing epithelium moves as an intact layer, and remnants of ECM (if they existed) would impede this movement.
Discussion
The time course of production of hemocytes and their release into circulation shows considerable differences between insect groups. In most cases studied (e.g., Akai and Sato 1971; Nakahara et al. 2003), bursts of hemocyte proliferation and release are coupled to the molting cycle of the larva. On top of this cyclic pattern, the ratio of differentiated versus undifferentiated cells generally increases with larval age. With the onset of metamorphosis, compact hematopoietic organs, which have been described for many insects (Han et al. 1998; Crossley 1964; Monpeyssin and Beaulaton 1978; Hoffmann et al. 1979), typically disappear after a final burst of hemocyte release. In other words, adults of most insect species, lack compact hematopoietic organs. The latter is true also for Drosophila, but in terms of earlier production and release of hemocytes during the larval stage, one notes that hemocyte proliferation does not appear to be coupled as strictly to the molting cycle and release does not occur at all prior to metamorphosis in Drosophila. Only in cases of infection or wounding, is the production of hemocytes stimulated, and their release into circulation seen. The same applies to a number of mutations [e.g., Hopscotch (Hop), encoding a Drosophila Janus Kinase)] in which hemocyte proliferation and/or differentiation is increased (Harrison et al. 1995; Minakhina and Steward 2006). The absence of hemocyte release during larval stages has been experimentally confirmed in the past by the analysis of labeled clones of hemocyte progenitors that were induced in embryos (Holz et al. 2003). These clones came to occupy the lymph glands of larvae but did not spread into circulation until immediately before pupation.
In the current study, we investigated the differentiative processes occurring in the Drosophila lymph gland prior to its dissociation. We found that one of the differentiation markers, Pxn, appears to be expressed in all hemocytes before they dissociate. Thus, both the medullary zone of the primary lobes, as well as the secondary lobes of the lymph gland, both of which are domains which only contain undifferentiated prohemocytes in the larva, show labeling with anti-Pxn in the early pupa. Pxn, an ECM protein, is synthesized by hemocytes among other cell types (Nelson et al. 1994) and is considered an early differentiation marker (Jung et al. 2005). A later differentiation marker, P1, appears only in a fraction of cells of the cortical zone in the larvae. In the 4 h pupa, P1 is still not expressed in the primary lobe medullary zone; only around 10 h APF, when a majority of the lymph gland has already been lost, do we see a majority of the (remaining) cells start to display expression of P1. Cells of the secondary lobes, on the other hand, remained negative for P1 expression till the very end, demonstrating that these cells dissociated as incompletely differentiated hemocytes.
As described previously by Lanot et al. (2001), crystal cells were quickly lost after the onset of metamorphosis. We found the persistence of small numbers of crystal cells until 2 h following the onset of pupation; by 6 h, crystal cells appeared to be completely absent from the lymph gland. Furthermore, as shown previously (Lanot et al. 2001), lamellocytes, the third type of Drosophila hemocytes, are never found in the pupal lymph gland. Lamellocytes are only rarely seen under normal conditions in either larva or adult (Lanot et al. 2001); they are induced by infection or wounding (Markus et al. 2005; Rizki and Rizki 1992).
Past studies had demonstrated the presence of mitotic cells (1–2%) in all lymph gland lobes of mid-third and wandering larva (Lanot et al. 2001). For the pupa, we observed a high level of cell division in the secondary lobes at 4 h APF and slightly less at 8 h APF; the primary lobes were virtually devoid of any proliferation until dissociation of the lymph gland occurred around 12 h APF. This finding supports the view that secondary lobes (which also appear later in development) are always at an earlier state of differentiation than primary lobes: cells remain mitotically active to the very end of lymph gland life, and concomitantly do not complete differentiation, as evidenced by the lack of P1 expression (see above).
How does the release of blood cells from the insect lymph gland compare to the corresponding process in vertebrates? Can one detect similarities that extend to the mechanisms controlling blood cell release across phylum boundaries? The blood forming tissue in most vertebrates is the bone marrow. The bone marrow is formed by blood vessels, capillaries and wide, endothelium bound venous sinuses. The spaces in between this vascular tissue are filled with stromal cells, blood stem and progenitor cells, and blood cells at successive stages of maturation (Lichtman 1981; Petrides and Dittmann 1990). Fully differentiated, postmitotic blood cells form a pool (“postmitotic pool”) of cells that is released in a controlled manner into the sinuses; here, blood cells can stay for extended period of time before moving out into circulation.
The process of releasing blood cells from the stroma into the sinuses (marrow egress) involves dynamic changes in both the blood cells themselves, as well as the cellular elements that form the physical boundary between bone marrow stroma and the blood. This boundary is formed by three layers: the endothelium lining the sinuses, specialized stromal cells called “adventitial cells” (Weiss 1980; Lichtman 1981; Petrides and Dittmann 1990; Inoue and Osmond 2001), and a basement membrane secreted by both cell types and deposited in the space between them. Blood cells and their progenitors themselves are not individually surrounded by a basement membrane, which constitutes a marked difference to the condition found in the insect hematopoietic tissues. When crossing from the stroma into the lumen of the sinuses, blood cells move in between clefts of adventitial cells and create pores in the basement membrane and the endothelial cells. This multistep process is orchestrated by multiple signaling interactions that are incompletely understood. A variety of signals derived from both the bone marrow stroma, as well as from peripheral blood cells and endothelial cells act on receptors on the to-be-released-blood cells, and cause changes in their adhesiveness, motility, and the secretion of extracellular proteins required to pave the way from stroma into the lumen of sinuses (Lapidot and Petit 2002; Velders and Fibbe 2005; Christopher and Link 2007). A well-known signal that inhibits blood cell egress from the marrow is stromal derived factor 1 (SDF1); opposing signals, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) act by degrading SDF1 and thereby allowing blood cells to pass into circulation. G-CSF and other signals also increase the release of metalloproteases from egressing blood cells, which may be important to locally remove the basement membranes that these blood cells have to traverse.
Localized digestion of basement membranes, possibly combined with an increased motility, appear to be the main processes that play a role in release of blood cells from the lymph gland of Drosophila. The underlying molecular mechanisms and its control by signaling pathways is currently not known. Extracellular matrix proteins assembled as basement membranes play a fundamental role in morphogenesis and organogenesis (Ekblom et al. 1985; Doihara et al. 2009; Mitsunaga-Nakatsubo et al. 2009; Tsang et al. 2010). Hemocytes are known to produce and secrete proteins used for stabilizing basement membranes around other tissues. For example, the highly conserved ECM protein SPARC is secreted by hemocytes and acts to stabilize collagen IV in the basement membranes surrounding muscles and other tissues (Martinek et al. 2008; Koehler et al. 2009). However, no hemocyte-derived protein has been described yet that would degrade extracellular matrix, including the basement membranes that captivate hemocytes within the lymph gland. It is possible that an increase in motility could be sufficient for hemocytes to tear and break through the encapsulating basement membranes. Thus, during normal development, a signal triggered by the ecdysone peak that promotes metamorphosis could induce both the proliferative/differentiative events that happen rapidly in the few hours between pupation and lymph gland dissociation, as well as an increased motility of hemocytes. A similar signal could act as part of the immune response that is able to trigger premature lymph gland dissociation in larvae infected with various parasites (Lanot et al. 2001; Sorrentino et al. 2002; Chiu and Govind 2002).
A signaling pathway known to be involved in hemocyte motility in the embryo is the PVR (PDGF-VEGF-Related) pathway. Hemocytes derived from the head mesoderm spread out along stereotyped pathways (Tepass et al. 1994) throughout the embryo. One should note that this phase of hemocyte dispersal, which is formally comparable to the dissociation of the lymph gland considered here, takes place in the absence of basement membranes around hemocytes. Thus, the population of head mesoderm cells that adopts the fate of prohemocytes in the stage 11 embryo does so before basement membranes have formed (Tepass and Hartenstein 1994). Prohemocytes initially form a loose mass of cells in the head of the embryo, lacking a capsule similar to the one that surrounds the prohemocytes of the larval lymph gland. Subsequently, in response to PVR signals, presented by various sources, prohemocytes migrate away from the head mesoderm and, at the same time, differentiate into plasmatocytes with phagocytotic activity (Cho et al. 2002; Bruckner et al. 2004). Lack of PVR, aside from causing an increase in cell death, also has an effect on hemocyte spreading. PVR signaling is also required for directed migration of larval hemocytes towards wounded tissue (Wood et al. 2006). A role of this pathway, or any other mechanism controlling motility, in hemocyte dispersal during early metamorphosis remains to be seen.
References
Agaisse H, Petersen UM, Boutros M, Mathey-Prevot B, Perrimon N (2003) Signaling role of hemocytes in Drosophila JAK/STAT-dependent response to septic injury. Dev Cell 5:441–450
Akai H, Sato S (1971) An ultrastructural study of the haemopoietic organs of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Insect Physiol 17:1665–1676
Alfonso TB, Jones BW (2002) gcm2 promotes glial cell differentiation and is required with glial cells missing for macrophage development in Drosophila. Dev Biol 248:369–383
Bruckner K, Kockel L, Duchek P, Luque CM, Rorth P, Perrimon N (2004) The PDGF/VEGF receptor controls blood cell survival in Drosophila. Dev Cell 7:73–84
Chiu H, Govind S (2002) Natural infection of D. melanogaster by virulent parasitic wasps induces apoptotic depletion of hematopoietic precursors. Cell Death Differ 9:1379–1381
Cho NK, Keyes L, Johnson E, Heller J, Ryner L, Karim F, Krasnow MA (2002) Developmental control of blood cell migration by the Drosophila VEGF pathway. Cell 108:865–876
Christopher MJ, Link DC (2007) Regulation of neutrophil homeostasis. Curr Opin Hematol 14:3–8
Crossley AC (1964) Experimental analysis of the origins and physiology of haemocytes in the blue blow fly Calliphora erythrocephala (Meig). J Exp Zool 157:375–397
Crozatier M, Meister M (2007) Drosophila haematopoiesis. Cell Microbiol 9:1117–1126
Doihara T, Miguchi Y, Miyawaki K, Shimokawa T, Hamada F, Kobayashi N, Matsuda S (2009) Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of oligosaccharides during early embryogenesis in the starfish Patiria pectinifera. Dev Genes Evol 219:199–206
Ekblom P, Sariola H, Thesleff I (1985) Basement membrane and organogenesis. Prog Clin Biol Res 171:109–121
Evans CJ, Hartenstein V, Banerjee U (2003) Thicker than blood: conserved mechanisms in Drosophila and vertebrate hematopoiesis. Dev Cell 5:673–690
Han SS, Lee MH, Kim WK, Wago H, Yoe SM (1998) Hemocytic differentiation in hemopoietic organ of Bombyx mori larvae. Zoolog Sci 15:371–379
Harrison DA, Binari R, Nahreini TS, Gilman M, Perrimon N (1995) Activation of a Drosophila Janus kinase (JAK) causes hematopoietic neoplasia and developmental defects. EMBO J 14:2857–2865
Hinks CF, Arnold JW (1977) Haemopoiesis in Lepidoptera. II. The role of the haemopoietic organs. Can J Zool 55:1740–1755
Hoffmann JA, Zachary D, Hoffmann D, Brehelin M (1979) Postembryonic development and differentiation: hemopoietic tissues and their functions in some insects. In: Gupta AP (ed) Insect hemocytes. Cambridge University Press, London
Holz A, Bossinger B, Strasser T, Janning W, Klapper R (2003) The two origins of hemocytes in Drosophila. Development 130:4955–4962
Inoue S, Osmond DG (2001) Basement membrane of mouse bone marrow sinusoids shows distinctive structure and proteoglycan composition: a high resolution ultrastructural study. Anat Rec 264:294–304
Jung SH, Evans CJ, Uemura C, Banerjee U (2005) The Drosophila lymph gland as a developmental model of hematopoiesis. Development 132:2521–2533
Kelso RJ, Buszczak M, Quinones AT, Castiblanco C, Mazzalupo S, Cooley L (2004) Flytrap, a database documenting a GFP protein-trap insertion screen in Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D418–D420
Koehler A, Desser S, Chang B, MacDonald J, Tepass U, Ringuette M (2009) Molecular evolution of SPARC: absence of the acidic module and expression in the endoderm of the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. Dev Genes Evol 219:509–521
Krzemien J, Dubois L, Makki R, Meister M, Vincent A, Crozatier M (2007) Control of blood cell homeostasis in Drosophila larvae by the posterior signalling centre. Nature 446:325–328
Krzemien J, Crozatier M, Vincent A (2010) Ontogeny of the Drosophila larval hematopoietic organ, hemocyte homeostasis and the dedicated cellular immune response to parasitism. Int J Dev Biol 54:1117–1125
Kurucz E, Zettervall CJ, Sinka R, Vilmos P, Pivarcsi A, Ekengren S, Hegedus Z, Ando I, Hultmark D (2003) Hemese, a hemocyte-specific transmembrane protein, affects the cellular immune response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2622–2627
Kurucz E, Markus R, Zsamboki J, Folkl-Medzihradszky K, Darula Z, Vilmos P, Udvardy A, Krausz I, Lukacsovich T, Gateff E, Zettervall CJ, Hultmark D, Ando I (2007) Nimrod, a putative phagocytosis receptor with EGF repeats in Drosophila plasmatocytes. Curr Biol 17:649–654
Lanot R, Zachary D, Holder F, Meister M (2001) Postembryonic hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 230:243–257
Lapidot T, Petit I (2002) Current understanding of stem cell mobilization: the roles of chemokines, proteolytic enzymes, adhesion molecules, cytokines, and stromal cells. Exp Hematol 30:973–981
Lebestky T, Chang T, Hartenstein V, Banerjee U (2000) Specification of Drosophila hematopoietic lineage by conserved transcription factors. Science 288:146–149
Lichtman MA (1981) The ultrastructure of the hemopoietic environment of the marrow: a review. Exp Hematol 9:391–410
Mandal L, Banerjee U, Hartenstein V (2004) Evidence for a fruit fly hemangioblast and similarities between lymph-gland hematopoiesis in fruit fly and mammal aorta-gonadal-mesonephros mesoderm. Nat Genet 36:1019–1023
Mandal L, Martinez-Agosto JA, Evans CJ, Hartenstein V, Banerjee U (2007) A Hedgehog- and Antennapedia-dependent niche maintains Drosophila haematopoietic precursors. Nature 446:320–324
Markus R, Kurucz E, Rus F, Ando I (2005) Sterile wounding is a minimal and sufficient trigger for a cellular immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Immunol Lett 101:108–111
Martinek N, Shahab J, Saathoff M, Ringuette M (2008) Haemocyte-derived SPARC is required for collagen-IV-dependent stability of basal laminae in Drosophila embryos. J Cell Sci 121:1671–1680
Minakhina S, Steward R (2006) Melanotic mutants in Drosophila: pathways and phenotypes. Genetics 174:253–263
Mitsunaga-Nakatsubo K, Akimoto Y, Kawakami H, Akasaka K (2009) Sea urchin arylsulfatase, an extracellular matrix component, is involved in gastrulation during embryogenesis. Dev Genes Evol 219:281–288
Monpeyssin M, Beaulaton J (1978) Hemocytopoiesis in the oak silkworm Antheraea pernyi and some other lepidoptera. I. Ultrastructural study of normal processes. J Ultrastruct Res 64:35–45
Morin X, Daneman R, Zavortink M, Chia W (2001) A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:15050–15055
Muller HM, Dimopoulos G, Blass C, Kafatos FC (1999) A hemocyte-like cell line established from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae expresses six prophenoloxidase genes. J Biol Chem 274:11727–11735
Nakahara Y, Kanamori Y, Kiuchi M, Kamimura M (2003) In vitro studies of hematopoiesis in the silkworm: cell proliferation in and hemocyte discharge from the hematopoietic organ. J Insect Physiol 49:907–916
Nelson RE, Fessler LI, Takagi Y, Blumberg B, Keene DR, Olson PF, Parker CG, Fessler JH (1994) Peroxidasin: a novel enzyme-matrix protein of Drosophila development. EMBO J 13:3438–3447
Petrides PE, Dittmann KH (1990) How do normal and leukemic white blood cells egress from the bone marrow? Morphological facts and biochemical riddles. Blut 61:3–13
Poulson D (1950) Histogenesis, organogenesis, and differentiation in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. In: Demerec M (ed) Biology of Drosophila. Wiley, New York, pp 168–274
Rizki TM, Rizki RM (1992) Lamellocyte differentiation in Drosophila larvae parasitized by Leptopilina. Dev Comp Immunol 16(2–3):103–110
Rugendorff A, Younossi-Hartenstein A, Hartenstein V (1994) Embryonic origin and differentiation of the Drosophila heart. Rouxs Arch Dev Biol 203:266–280
Sorrentino RP, Carton Y, Govind S (2002) Cellular immune response to parasite infection in the Drosophila lymph gland is developmentally regulated. Dev Biol 243:65–80
Srivastava A, Pastor-Pareja JC, Igaki T, Pagliarini R, Xu T (2007) Basement membrane remodeling is essential for Drosophila disc eversion and tumor invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2721–2726
Tepass U, Hartenstein V (1994) The development of cellular junctions in the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol 161:563–596
Tepass U, Fessler LI, Aziz A, Hartenstein V (1994) Embryonic origin of hemocytes and their relationship to cell death in Drosophila. Development 120:1829–1837
Tsang KY, Cheung MC, Chan D, Cheah KS (2010) The developmental roles of the extracellular matrix: beyond structure to regulation. Cell Tissue Res 339:93–110
Velders GA, Fibbe WE (2005) Involvement of proteases in cytokine-induced hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Ann NY Acad Sci 1044:60–69
Weiss L (1980) The haemopoietic microenvironment of bone marrow: an ultrastructural study of the interactions of blood cells, stroma and blood vessels. Ciba Found Symp 71:3–19
Wood W, Faria C, Jacinto A (2006) Distinct mechanisms regulate hemocyte chemotaxis during development and wound healing in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 173:405–416
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award GM007185 and the HFSP Grant RGP0015/2008-C to VH. We would also like to thank I. Ando, U. Banerjee, L. Cooley, J. Fessler, L. Fessler, F. Kafatos, the Bloomington Stock Center, and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for fly strains and antibodies. We would also like to thank Marianne Cilluffo and the Brain Research Institute Electron Microscopy Core at UCLA for help in processing our TEM samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by C. Desplan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grigorian, M., Mandal, L. & Hartenstein, V. Hematopoiesis at the onset of metamorphosis: terminal differentiation and dissociation of the Drosophila lymph gland. Dev Genes Evol 221, 121–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-011-0364-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-011-0364-6