Abstract
It is widely accepted that the estimation of biological attributes in the human skeleton is more accurate when population-specific standards are applied. With the shortage of such data for contemporary North African populations, it is duly required to establish population-specific standards. We present here the first craniometric standards for sex determination of a contemporary Tunisian population. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between sex and metric parameters of the skull in this population using CT scan analysis and to generate proper reliable standards for sex determination of a complete or fragmented skull. The study sample comprised cranial multislice computed tomography scans of 510 individuals equally distributed by sex. ASIRTM software in a General ElectricTM workstation was used to position 37 landmarks along the volume-rendered images and the multiplanar slices, defining 27 inter-landmark distances. Frontal and parietal bone thickness was also measured for each case. The data were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics and logistic regression with cross-validation of classification results. All of the measurements were sexually dimorphic with male values being higher than female values. A nine-variable model achieved the maximum classification accuracy of 90% with −2.9% sex bias and a six-variable model yielded 85.9% sexing accuracy with −0.97% sex bias. We conclude that the skull is highly dimorphic and represents a reliable bone for sex determination in contemporary Tunisian individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Successfully determining the sex of the individual is an essential component in the process of identification, as it helps to narrow down the list of potential identifications (e.g., eliminates members of the opposite sex) and increases the accuracy of subsequent methods for estimating other biological attributes (e.g., sex-specific age and stature estimation standards) [1,2,3].
The pelvis is regarded as the best indicator of sex [4], but the often poor state of pelvic preservation makes the use of the skull, which tends to resist taphonomic phenomena better, more important [5, 6]. Besides, the skull is not only reported to be a good indicator for sex determination [4] but also offers the possibility for facial reconstruction of the subject [7], providing clues of utmost importance in the goal of identification.
Metric methods for sex determination from the skull were introduced in the middle of the twentieth century [8], and their main advantage is that more objective results can be obtained compared with the non-metric methods.
However, anthropometric methods remain most accurate when population-specific data are applied [9,10,11,12,13]. Many factors may influence skeletal morphology, such as genetics, environmental factors, migration flows, and secular trends [14,15,16]. Consequently, population-specific standards should be generated and regularly updated.
In the absence of documented archeological collections, medical imaging archives offer a suitable source of population-specific contemporary data, from which skeletal standards can be developed. It has been proven that imaging techniques, especially the multislice computed tomography (MSCT), are reliable for use in anthropometric studies [17,18,19,20,21]. Discriminant functions developed from 3D CT scans of the skull could also be calculated with an accuracy reaching 90% [9].
In Tunisia and in North Africa, there are no contemporary population-specific skeletal standards for the estimation of sex, a fact that may be an issue in forensic practice considering that the North African genetic pool is an admixture of the original inhabitants (Berbers) with those of neighboring and distant populations [22, 23]. Besides, the high (legal and illegal) migration flow led to a rise in the number of unknown skeletons and putrefying corpses with proper identification challenges. This highlights the need to establish a set of accurate and reliable, population-specific, discriminant functions that allow sex estimation from 3D MSCT of bones of North African individuals.
The objective of the current study was to analyze the correlation between sex and metric parameters of the skull in a contemporary Tunisian population using CT scan analysis.
Methods
Study sample
In this study, we analyzed craniometric parameters acquired in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of 510 adult individuals. The sample was collected from the cranial MSCT of living Tunisian patients who presented at the imaging department of Charles Nicolle’s Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia, for a medical investigation from January 2013 to June 2015. The inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, known sex, and CT scans without contrast enhancement.
We excluded CT scans showing skull malformation, infectious or neoplastic pathology, Paget’s disease of the bone, or signs of recent or ancient trauma. We randomly selected 510 scans equally distributed by sex (255 males, 255 females), with age ranging from 18 to 100 years (mean = 56 years, SD = 18 years). The scans were then anonymized. Only information about sex and age were recorded and then blinded.
Imaging technique
The scans were performed on a General Electric 16-channel Multidetector tomographer, Healthcare Brightspeed™, VDTEXTe model with a tube voltage of 120 kV and effective mAs of 160 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA).
The CT scans were selected to ensure that the space between slices was less than the slice thickness (insuring visualization of all anatomical structures). Axial slices thickness ranged from 0.9 to 1.3 mm. MSCT Multiplanar (axial, coronal, and sagittal) images were post-processed to create a volumetric tridimensional reconstruction using ASIR™ software in a General Electric™ workstation (Advantage Workstation, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). A preset image filter displaying the bone with a wide opacity ramp was set at a window/level operation (W/L) of 2000/500. The workstation software has a measurement tool allowing the linear distance between two points to be automatically calculated.
Craniometric parameters
A total of 37 landmarks (14 bilateral and 9 midline located landmarks) were identified (detailed definitions of the landmarks are given in Online Resources 1 and 2), defining 27 linear inter-landmark distances (Table 1).
For the orbital breadth measurement, the maxillofrontale was employed as an internal limit instead of the dacryon (point on the medial border of the orbit that marks the junction of the sutures between the frontal, maxillary, and lachrymal bones [27]) for two main reasons: Firstly, previous studies reported difficulties in identifying the dacryon in CT sections [7, 17, 21, 28], and secondly, the maxillofrontale landmark is—as suggested by Piquet [25]—more suitable for the measurement of the orbital breadth and was reported to be easier to identify [7]. In association with traditional inter-landmark craniometric measurements, bone thickness was measured at two locations, as described by May et al. [29].
-
Frontal bone thickness (FBT): measured 1 cm anterior to the bregma on the midsagittal plane, perpendicular to the endocranial table surface.
-
Parietal bone thickness (PBT): measured 3 cm anterior to the lambda, perpendicular to the endocranial table surface.
Data acquisition
Anatomical landmarks were manually identified along the volume rendered (VR) images and verified on the multiplanar slices. Inter-landmark measurements and bone thickness were then calculated using the workstation software measurement tool (examples in Figs. 1, 2, and 3). Rotation, translation, zoom, and transparency tools were used to allow the precise identification of landmarks.
As the geometrically defined landmarks (i.e., type III) may be difficult to position directly on the 3D surfaces with accuracy, the Frankfurt Horizontal plane was constructed to guide the process. Two axes provided by the original software were placed on the CT slices so that the first one matched the right and left porion, and the second matched the left porion (po) and left Inferior orbital margin (oi) representing the Frankfurt plane, as defined by Martin [30]. A third axis, perpendicular to the established horizontal plane, was shifted to extremities in order to obtain a tangent to a bone structure; their meeting point was identified as the landmark.
In some cases, only the neurocranium was considered of interest during the imaging process (depending on the clinical problem that motivated the CT scan), and the lower parts of the skull (facial skeleton and the mastoid processes) were partially scanned; therefore, measurements involving landmarks located on these structures could not be collected.
Statistical analyses
Descriptive and univariate analyses
The statistical analyses were performed with Microsoft Excel® and R® v 3.1.1 for windows (R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.).
A descriptive analysis was performed for each variable. Sample sizes, sample means, standard deviations, and maximum and minimum values were calculated for each variable in both sex groups. The normal distribution of the data was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk’s test and the equality of variances using Fisher’s test.
Sexual dimorphism was investigated by comparing the male and female mean values for each craniometric parameter using parametric (Student’s t test)/non-parametric (Mann-Whitney U and Aspin Welsh) statistical tests and taking the p value <0.05 as significant. Two sexual dimorphism ratios were computed for each variable:
- The Lovich-Gibbons (LG) ratio = Male mean/Female mean [31].
- The logarithmic ratio = Ln (Male mean/Female mean) [32].
Precision study
We randomly selected 28 CT scans. They were assessed twice by the main operator, at 1 week interval (to evaluate the intra-observer error), and three times by a second operator, with the same time lapse (to evaluate the inter-observer error). The second operator had an introduction to the method, had the landmark definitions, and tested different measurements on 20 CT scans before the evaluation.
For each craniometric parameter and for each operator, we computed the technical error of measurement (TEM) [17, 33, 34], the relative technical error of measurement (rTEM) [17, 33,34,35], and the reliability coefficient (R) [34, 36]. The relative TEM (rTEM) is calculated to compensate for the positive association between TEM and measurement size. The R coefficient allows an estimation of the proportion of total measurement variance that is unrelated to measurement error, with values ranging between 0 (not reliable) and 1 (completely reliable). A value of 0.9 indicates that 90% of the total variability is “true” biological variation, and that the remaining 10% is due to measurement error (imprecision and unreliability).
Multivariate analyses
A multiple logistic regression using backward stepwise selection was applied to determine sex based on the average data of craniometric parameters. The variables that were included in the logistic model fitting process were those with a p value <0.2 in the mean comparison tests, rTEM ≤5% and R ≥ 0.9.
An outcome from the logistic regression of P > 0.5 would be classified as male while an outcome of P < 0.5 would be considered female (an outcome of 0.5 indicates indeterminate sex). Multiple other models were generated by direct logistic regression on single variables and by combining the most sexually dimorphic parameter according to the sexual dimorphism ratios. Three models were specifically designed for the cranial vault, the cranial base, and the facial skeleton; these models can be potentially helpful for sex estimation in case of fragmented skulls.
In order to validate the generated models, we calculated the posterior probabilities (PP) and sex bias and performed a leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The sex bias was calculated by subtracting the male correct prediction percentage from the female correct prediction percentage.
Results
Precision study
All of the measurements fell within the acceptable range of intra-observer and inter-observer technical error of measurement (rTEM ≤5%), and 26 out of 29 measurements exhibited an acceptable reliability coefficient (R ≥ 0.9). The R value was low for the right orbital breadth (total TEM = 1.15 mm, SD = 1.84 mm, R = 0.61) and the left orbital breadth (total TEM = 1.47 mm, SD = 2.09 mm, R = 0.5). The R value of the right mastoidal height was 0.88 (total TEM = 0.97, SD = 2.75), while the left mastoidal height had a value of 0.91 (total TEM = 0.89, SD = 3) (detailed results of the precision study are provided in Online Resource 3).
Univariate analyses
The males’ mean values for the 27 inter-landmark distances and the two bone thickness measurements were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the corresponding female values (Table 2), indicating the presence of sexual dimorphism in the skulls of the study sample.
The mastoid processes measurements (MHLleft, MHLright, and BMS), the left orbital breadth (OBLleft), and the bizygomatic breadth (ZYB) had the highest sexual dimorphism ratios (Table 2).
Logistic regression
Direct single variable
Direct logistic regression performed separately on each variable enabled single-variable discriminant models to be established. The most accurate single predictors were ZYB, cranial base length (CBL), glabelle-lambda length (GLL), maximum cranial length (MCL), left mastoidal height (MHL left), bimastoidale (BMS), and nasio-occipital length (NOL), with sexing accuracy ranging from 79.41% for ZYB to 70% for NOL (Table 3).
Stepwise and direct multiple variable
Two main models were calculated, yielding the highest rates of classification accuracy. The first model (model1) had the highest cross-validated accuracy at 90.04% (Table 4).
Model 1: Z = (0.28408 x ZYB) – (0.13913 x JUB) + (0.11511 x CBL) – (0.04838 x FFB) + (0.77845 x MCL) – (1.06662 x NOL) + (0.34175 x GLL) + (0.10356 x BMS) + (0.2181 x MHLleft) - 55.58661.
However, the second model was considered the most “practical” with fewer measurements needed (parsimony principle), and achieving 85.9% cross-validated accuracy (Table 4).
Model 2: Z = (0.15659 x ZYB) – (0.9574 x MCL) + (0.20961 x GLL) + (0.15035 x BMS) + (0.26275 x MHLleft) - 63.41141.
Furthermore, to handle cases with partial fragmentation of the skull, other models were generated using variables measured at the cranial vault alone (model 3), the cranial base (model 4), or the facial skeleton (model 5):
Model 3: Z = (−0.07097 x MFB) + (0.18826 x FFB) + (0.97636 x MCL) – (1.16835 x NOL) + (0.39094 x GLL) – (0.09968 x PC) - 36.85134;
Model 4: Z = (0.1422 x FOB) + (0.1357 x CBL) + (0.1883 x BMS) + (0.3443 x MHLleft) - 48.1572;
Model 5: Z = 0.3221 x ZYB - 41.2822.
These models had accuracy rates ranging from 79.41 to 83% (Table 4).
Discussion
The purpose of the current study was to analyze the relationship between male and female crania and the differences in cranial measurements as they relate to sexual dimorphism. The univariate analyses revealed a significant difference between sex groups for all of the investigated craniometric parameters, with males displaying larger average values than females. These measurements were then used to generate formulas to determine the sex of an individual within the Tunisian sample, with precision reaching 90%.
Since the implementation of the Daubert ruling, forensic scientists are required to substantiate their assertions with testable, reliable, replicable, and scientifically valid methods [11, 37,38,39].
In anthropometric studies, an R value greater than 0.95 should be “sought where possible” [34]. Franklin et al. suggested that any measurement with an R value below 0.9 and rTEM above 5% should be treated with caution [17].
Usually, type II and III landmarks present with lower precision compared to type I landmarks [40, 41]; therefore, measurements inclusive of type II and III landmarks were expected to result in lower repeatability.
The coefficient of reliability was at its lowest for right and left orbital breadths (respectively 0.61 and 0.5), defined by landmarks of type I (maxillofrontale) and type III (ectoconchion). Even if the intra- and inter-observer rTEM were at acceptable rates (possibly related to the use of the maxillofrontale instead of the dacryon), the absolute measurement error rates of the orbital breadths were offset by low standard deviations, thus resulting in low coefficients of reliability.
The right mastoid height (MHLright) had a coefficient of reliability of 0.88, indicating that 12% of the variance of this variable may be due to measurement error. Although the absolute error for both right and left mastoid heights were small (0.97 and 0.89 mm of the total TEM, respectively), the difference in variances (2.75 mm for MHLright and 3 mm for MHLleft) may explain the lower R coefficient observed for the right mastoid height. The remaining variables had an R coefficient, TEM and rTEM in line with published research [17, 21, 42].
While using the Frankfurt plane method, a limited amount of intra and inter-observer error rate was noticed in this study. The reliability of the measurement protocol was insured by the verification of the exact location of landmarks within the multiplanar images along with the volume rendered reconstructions.
The 27 inter-landmark distances and the bone thickness of the two locations exhibited a strong sexual dimorphism, with male values being significantly higher than those of females. Previous craniometric studies had similar results with an obvious “size” sexual dimorphism in the skull [8,9,10, 28, 43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
MCL, ZYB, mastoid height (MHL), and bimastoidale (BMS) included in the first and second models were frequently encountered within sex prediction formulas in a variety of diverse populations [8,9,10, 28, 43, 51, 52]. The GLL and bijugal breadth (JUB) retrieved in the first model had been previously reported as strong predictors of sex when included in a multivariate model [53].
The ZYB is well established as being among the most dimorphic in the human skull in several populations (e.g., Australian [9], South African Black and White [46, 51], Turkish [28], Northern Indian [54], Japanese [10], and Cretan [43]). Also in our study, this craniometric distance was highly accurate within a single variable discriminant model with a 79.4% level of accuracy and sex bias of less than 1%. Previous research reported similar accuracies (78 to 85.5%) [9, 43, 46, 51, 54].
The accuracy reported in several previous studies ranged from 73.2 to 90% for functions constructed with three variables [9, 52, 54], from 80.8 to 91.1% for functions constructed with four variables [10, 55, 56], and from to 85.9 to 87.1% for formulas constructed with five to six variables [28, 43].
The multivariable models generated by stepwise and direct logistic regression in the current study achieved high classification accuracies ranging from 85.9% (model 2) to 90% (model 1) and low sex bias (respectively −0.97 and −2.9%). These results are comparable to published accuracies in other populations (85.5 to 90%) [8,9,10, 28, 43, 54, 57].
Models generated for partially fragmented crania can be useful in skulls with vital trauma or postmortem damage. Although the 3rd, 4th, and 5th functions were less accurate, they provided an opportunity to correctly determine the sex of a damaged skull with a classification accuracy ranging from 79.4% (model 5) to 83% (model 4).
Since concerns exist regarding the accuracy of CT images in reflecting an object’s true dimensions, several papers dealt with the extent to which CT scan craniometrics can be used in forensic anthropology. An acceptable concordance had been demonstrated between measurements taken directly from a dry skull (using a digitizer or a caliper) and those taken from the volume rendered CT image of the same dry element [17,18,19,20, 58]. When comparing the accuracy of cranial measurements collected using three different means: CT scan VR images including soft tissues, CT scan VR images after soft tissues removal, and direct measurements in the dry skulls, Stull et al. [21] considered the between-methods differences as an acceptable amount of error in forensic anthropology, and that these differences are more a consequence of measurement repeatability than related to imaging artifacts. Furthermore, Stull et al. [21] stated that “CT scans inclusive of soft tissues are recommended for metric data collection if the goal is to create an applicable anthropological technique”. Thereby, regarding the high resolution of the CT scans in the present study and the small error rate of the measurements composing the proposed models, it can be presumed that the models developed in the present study can be useable on dry bone findings.
The relation between human cranial thickness and parameters of the biological profile is the subject of continuing discussion. Several studies have shown conflicting or inconclusive results concerning the relationship between cranial thickness and sex, age, and other biological parameters such as body build and ancestry [59, 60].
Countless factors account for the variation in research findings, such as sampling bias (e.g., small sample populations), the confounding effects of pathology, variations in data collection methodologies, and ways in which data were analyzed [61, 62].
Most researchers noticed that, when it comes to cranial thickness, females have usually higher mean values than males [59, 60, 63].
A correlation with aging could be observed for cranial thickness in some studies, with an increase in cranial thickness for ages over 50 years, especially for females [60, 64]. This pattern was attributed to the incidence of hyperostosis frontalis interna (HFI), and according to Ross et al. [60], cranial thickness is sexually dimorphic by the onset of HFI.
The current study reported a significant difference in both frontal and parietal bone thickness between males and females. Regarding the mean values, males had significantly thicker bones than females; these findings differ from the reported results of previous studies. Numerous hypotheses could be stated at this point:
-
This could be a particular trend in the Tunisian population, in a population-specific manner.
-
Possible non-investigated confusion factors could bias the interpretation, considering that significant correlations between bone thickness and other biological parameters, like body built or age, had been reported in previous studies [60, 63, 64].
It is important to state that a comparison with other studies remains difficult regarding the frequently different sites of measure, even for the same bone, and the different analysis methods.
This study is part of an ongoing research project aiming to create a specific and representative anthropological database that would improve the proficiency of Tunisian forensic practitioners when dealing with identification issues. As documented skeletal collections are not available in Tunisia, medical scans represent an appropriate source of data for collecting contemporary skeletal standards and, eventually, updating existing data. MSCT of living individuals performed for a diagnostic purpose offer an opportunity for obtaining virtual skeletons with a high resolution, avoiding any unnecessary radiation exposure, and providing data which are consistent with those obtained by traditional anthropological methods.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the skull was highly dimorphic and represented a reliable bone for sex determination in contemporary Tunisian individuals. Based on a CT scan study of 27 studied inter-landmark distances, we were able to identify a nine-variable model achieving a classification accuracy of 90% with −2.9% sex bias and a six-variable model yielding 85.9% sexing accuracy with −0.97 sex bias. Also, three supplementary models were generated allowing for sex determination of incomplete skulls.
References
White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA (2012) Human Osteology. Elsevier, Paris
Işcan MY, Steyn M (2013) The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Charles C Thomas Publisher ltd. Springfield, Illinois
Işcan MY (2005) Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. Forensic Sci Int 147:107–112
Scheuer L (2002) Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat 15:297–312
Stojanowski CM, Seidemann RM, Doran GH (2002) Differential skeletal preservation at Windover Pond: causes and consequences. Am J Phys Anthropol 119:15–26
Walker P (1995) Problems of preservation and sexism in sexing: some lessons from historical collections for palaeodemographers. In: Saunders SR, Herring A (eds) Grave reflections portraying the past through cemetery studies. Canadian Scholaris Press Inc., Toronto 18:31–48
Guyomarc’h P, Dutailly B, Charton J et al (2014) Anthropological facial approximation in three dimensions (AFA3D): computer-assisted estimation of the facial morphology using geometric morphometrics. J Forensic Sci 59:1502–1516
Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:53–68
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A (2013) Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 229:158.e1–158.e8
Ogawa Y, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S, Yoshino M (2013) Discriminant functions for sex estimation of modern Japanese skulls. J Forensic Legal Med 20:234–238
Dirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, Symes SA (2008) New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol (suppl 47):33–52
Guyomarc’h P, Bruzek J (2011) Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: a comparison of Fordisc 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis. Forensic Sci Int 208:30–35
Bidmos MA, Dayal MR (2004) Further evidence to show population specificity of discriminant function equations for sex determination using the talus of South African blacks. J Forensic Sci 49:1165–1170
Weisensee KE, Jantz RL (2011) Secular changes in craniofacial morphology of the Portuguese using geometric morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:548–559
Spradley MK, Jantz RL, Robinson A, Peccerelli F (2008) Demographic change and forensic identification: problems in metric identification of Hispanic skeletons. J Forensic Sci 53:21–28
Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Verhoff MA (2007) Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 121:477–482
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A et al (2013) Concordance of traditional osteometric and volume-rendered MSCT inter-landmark cranial measurements. Int J Legal Med 127:505–520
Verhoff MA, Ramsthaler F, Krähahn J et al (2008) Digital forensic osteology—possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. Forensic Sci Int 174:152–156
Citardi MJ, Herrmann B, Hollenbeak CS et al (2001) Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of Skull Base and Craniomaxillofacial dimensions. Skull Base 11:5–11
Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S et al (2007) Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 104:402–411
Stull KE, Tise ML, Ali Z, Fowler DR (2014) Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images. Forensic Sci Int 238:133–140
Hajjej A, Kâabi H, Sellami MH et al (2006) The contribution of HLA class I and II alleles and haplotypes to the investigation of the evolutionary history of Tunisians. Tissue Antigens 68:153–162
Cherni L, Pakstis AJ, Boussetta S et al (2016) Genetic variation in Tunisia in the context of human diversity worldwide. Am J Phys Anthropol 00:00–00
Buikstra J, Ubelaker D (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Semin. F. Museum Nat. Hist
Piquet M (1954) L'indice orbitaire et l’appréciation de la largeur de l’orbite ; essai de standardisation. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 100–112
Howells WW (1989) Skull shapes and the map: craniometric analyses in the dispersion of modern Homo. Pap Peabody Museum Archaeol Ethnol 79
Howells WW (1977) Cranial variation in man. A study by multivariate analysis of patterns of difference among recent human populations. J Hum Evol 6:513–514
Ekizoglu O, Hocaoglu E, Inci E et al (2016) Assessment of sex in a modern Turkish population using cranial anthropometric parameters. Legal Med 21:45–52
May H, Mali Y, Dar G et al (2012) Intracranial volume, cranial thickness, and hyperostosis frontalis interna in the elderly. Am J Hum Biol 24:812–819
Martin R (1928) Becken. In: Lehrb der Anthropol Syst darstellung mit Bes berücksichtigung der Anthropol methoden pp 1031–1037:1120–1133
Lovich JE, Gibbons JW (1992) A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Dev Aging 56:269–281
Smith RJ (1999) Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. J Hum Evol 36:423–458
Perini TA, de Oliveira GL, Ornelia JS, de Oliveira FP (2005) Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Rev Bras Med do Esporte 11:81–85
Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA (1999) Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr 82:165
Goto R, Mascie-Taylor CGN (2007) Precision of measurement as a component of human variation. J Physiol Anthropol 26:253–256
Multicentre WHO, Reference G, Group S et al (2006) Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO multicenter growth reference study. Acta Paediatr Suppl 450:47–55
Grivas CR, Komar DA (2008) Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 53:771–776
Merlino ML, Springer V, Kelly JS, Hammond D (2007) Meeting the challenges of the Daubert trilogy: refining and redefining the reliability of forensic evidence. Tulsa L Rev 43:417
Steadman DW, Adams BJ, Konigsberg LW (2006) Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:15–26
Sholts SB, Flores L, Walker PL, Wärmländer SKTS (2011) Comparison of coordinate measurement precision of different landmark types on human crania using a 3D laser scanner and a 3D digitizer: implications for applications of digital morphometrics. Int J Osteoarchaeol 21:535–543
Ross AH, Williams S (2008) Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania. J Forensic Sci 53:782–785
Nagaoka T, Kawakubo Y, Hirata K (2012) Evidence for temporal and social differences in cranial dimensions in edo-period Japanese. Int J Osteoarchaeol 22:409–422
Kranioti EF, Işcan MY, Michalodimitrakis M (2008) Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population. Forensic Sci Int 180:1–5
Guyomarc’h P, Bruzek J (2010) Dimorphisme sexuel du crâne de sujets identifiés (collection Olivier, MNHN, Paris): Évaluation par morphométrie géométrique. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 22:216–229
Zavando Matamala DA, Suazo Galdames IC, Smith RL (2009) Sexual dimorphism determination from the lineal dimensions of skulls. Int J Morphol 27:133–137
Steyn M, Işcan MY (1998) Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 98:9–16
Rooppakhrun S, Piyasin S, Sitthiseripratip K (2009) 3D CT craniometric study of Thai skulls relevance to sex determination using logistic regression analysis. IFMBE Proc 23:761–764
Birkby WH (1966) An estimation of race and sex identification from the cranial measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 42:21–27
Johnson DR, O’Higgins P, Moore WJ, McAndrew TJ (1989) Determination of race and sex of the human skull by discriminant function analysis of linear and angular dimensions. Forensic Sci Int 41:41–53
Molto JE (1979) The assessment and meaning of intra-observer error in population studies based on discontinuous cranial traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 51:333–344
Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol 55:213–228
Mehta M, Saini V, Nath S, Menon SK (2015) CT scan images for sex discrimination—a preliminary study on Gujarati population. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 3:43–48
Green H, Curnoe D (2009) Sexual dimorphism in Southeast Asian crania: a geometric morphometric approach. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol 60:517–534
Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK et al (2011) An osteometric study of northern Indian populations for sexual dimorphism in craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 56:700–705
Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA (2008) An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol 59:209–221
Sangvichien S, Boonkaew K, Chuncharunee A et al (2007) Sex determination in Thai skulls by using craniometry: multiple logistic regression analysis. Siriraj Med J 59:216–221
Krüger GC, L'Abbé EN, Stull KE, Kenyhercz MW (2015) Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans. Int J Legal Med 129:869–875
Williams FLE, Richtsmeier JT (2003) Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data. Clin Anat 16:494–500
Lynnerup N, Astrup JG, Sejrsen B (2005) Thickness of the human cranial diploe in relation to age, sex and general body build. Head Face Med 1:13
Ross AH, Jantz RL, McCormick WF (1998) Cranial thickness in American females and males. J Forensic Sci 43:267–272
Lynnerup N (2001) Cranial thickness in relation to age, sex and general body build in a Danish forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int 117:45–51
Albert AM, Ricanek K, Patterson E (2007) A review of the literature on the aging adult skull and face: implications for forensic science research and applications. Forensic Sci Int 172:1–9
De Boer HH, Van der Merwe AE, Soerdjbalie-Maikoe V (2016) Human cranial vault thickness in a contemporary sample of 1097 autopsy cases: relation to body weight, stature, age, sex and ancestry. Int J Legal Med 130:1371–1377
Doual M, Ferri J, Laude M (1997) The influence of senescence on craniofacial and cervical morphology in humans. Surg Radiol Anat 19:175–183
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Dr. Aycha Ben Miled for her valuable help in the manuscript editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaafrane, M., Ben Khelil, M., Naccache, I. et al. Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull. Int J Legal Med 132, 853–862 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1688-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1688-1