Abstract
The investigation of many lung diseases currently requires bronchoscopic or surgical histopathological tissue biopsy. This creates risks for patients and entails processing costs and delays in diagnosis. However, several mainly probe-based biophotonic techniques that can image solitary lesions and diffuse lung diseases are fuelling a paradigm shift toward real-time in vivo diagnosis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) uses near-infrared light in a process analogous to ultrasonography to image the mucosal and submucosal tissue boundaries of the bronchial tree. With 15-μm resolution, early work suggests it can differentiate between neoplasia, carcinoma in situ, dysplasia, and metaplasia based around epithelial thickness and breaches in the basement membrane. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) has superior resolution but less penetration than OCT and employs blue argon laser light to fluoresce the endogenous elastin of (1) the acinar scaffold of the peripheral lung and (2) the basement membrane lying under bronchial mucosa. Initial studies suggest that the regular fibre arrangement of the basement membrane is altered in the presence of overlying malignant epithelium. pCLE produces detailed representations of the alveolar septal walls, microvessels, and some inflammatory cells. A third device, the endocytoscope, is a contact microscope requiring contrast agent to provide subcellular resolution of bronchial mucosa. Further development of these “optical biopsy” techniques and evaluation of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the acquired images are needed before they can be considered effective methods for eliminating the need for, and thus risks of, pinch biopsy to enable real-time diagnosis to streamline management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Histopathological tissue assessment with multidisciplinary correlation [1] remains the gold standard for accurate diagnosis of many lung conditions, including solitary nodules, malignancies, and diffuse lung diseases (DLD). Tissue diagnosis requires lesions to be biopsied, either bronchoscopically or surgically. When undertaking biopsies of DLD or distal lesions at bronchoscopy there is a need for blind transbronchial biopsies, with a 1-12% risk of pneumothorax [2–5] and a 2-9% risk of significant bleeding [3, 6, 7]. Transthoracic biopsy is preferred for peripheral lesions, either percutaneously or via minithoracotomy or thoracoscopy (VATS) [8]. Surgical biopsy requires a general anaesthetic, a longer hospital stay, and a different spectrum of risks [9], particularly as this patient group already has significant respiratory compromise. There are time and cost implications with the preparation and reporting of tissue samples, extracted specimens are susceptible to minor morphological alterations from dehydration and chemical fixation, and biopsying creates trauma and scarring that may hinder subsequent attempts to monitor dysplastic lesions. Microscopic examination of cells from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) provides further information, but even this can cause dyspnoea, pleuritic pain [10], and fever/flulike symptoms [11].
White light videobronchoscopy is commonly used for rapid macroscopic examination of the large and medium airways but has a low sensitivity for the detection of small superficial mucosal abnormalities and areas of intraepithelial neoplasia [12]. This has led to the development of modalities such as autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) [13–15], narrow-band imaging (NBI) [16, 17], high-magnification bronchoscopy [18], and optical spectroscopy [19] in order to better recognise tissue abnormalities. Whilst relatively straightforward to perform and highly sensitive, their specificity to differentiate neoplasia from inflammation or dysplasia is insufficient to obviate the need for tissue biopsy, and they are unable to image beyond the proximal bronchial tree or add diagnostic information during the investigation of DLD. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is an increasingly utilised tool for imaging beyond the mucosal surface. High-frequency (20 MHz) radial ultrasound probes have a resolution of less than 1 mm and can distinguish certain histological characteristics of the airway wall [20] and of peripheral lesions [21, 22], but even at this resolution biopsies are still required for a firm diagnosis to be made.
Technologies with better resolution and contrast have therefore been sought in order to eliminate the need for conventional biopsy by providing histopathological quality real-time images in situ: the so-called “optical biopsy.” Whilst they are still primarily used for research, this review presents the limited but often promising clinical data available for three of these technologies (technical outline in Table 1).
Optical Coherence Tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a probe-based imaging technique that is being explored for several clinical niches, including gastroenterology [23], ophthalmology [24], dermatology [25], and vascular medicine [26, 27]. Analogous to ultrasonography, a catheter tip transmits broadband near-infrared (NIR) light through an optical fibre to detect the reflectance and backscattering properties of the tissue, each of which is influenced by changes in tissue density or refractive index boundaries such as cell membranes or structures [28]. By measuring the echo time delay between transmission and detection using a technique called low-coherence interferometry, an optical depth scan may be recorded. A B-scan may then be performed by translating the optical probe, allowing, for instance, a circumferential transluminal cross-sectional tomographic image to be constructed[29]. Air transmits NIR light, so the technique is immediately suited to the airways and, unlike endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), there is no requirement for direct contact with tissue, eliminating any potential physical distortion. Whilst current technology provides only 2-3 mm of penetration, this is sufficient for imaging most early bronchogenic carcinomas. As the diffraction limit and coherence length of the light source is a fraction of those of the acoustic waves used in ultrasound, the lateral and axial resolution of OCT can be as good as 5 μm, which is 10-20 times lower than high-frequency ultrasound [21], though commercially 15-μm resolution is more realistic which still enables OCT to image to the level of individual nuclei [30]. It is a relatively inexpensive and portable technology: the collaboration between LightLab Imaging in Boston and Pentax in Tokyo produced a radially scanning 1.5-mm-diameter probe that can be passed down the working channel of a bronchoscope [30]; the Niris imaging system (Imalux Corp, Cleveland, OH) is forward scanning with a larger outer diameter of 2.7 mm [31].
In ex vivo studies OCT shows the layered structure of the bronchial tree, demarcating the mucosa, lamina propria, and the underlying perichondrium and cartilage. The boundary of the epithelium and cartilage is particularly distinct, and it also has sufficient resolution to outline mucous glands and layers of smooth muscle within the submucosa [32]. The structure of the alveoli adjacent to peripheral airways has also been shown [33]. During in vivo OCT with the aforementioned forward-scanning probe, Michel et al. [31] recently noted that these tissue boundaries are destroyed by endobronchial tumours, and during fluorescence bronchoscopic examination by Lam et al. [30], radial OCT enabled accurate measurement of the respiratory epithelium thickness. Breaches of the highly scattering basement membrane allowed differentiation between invasive neoplasia (although not histological subtype), carcinoma in situ, dysplasia, and metaplasia (Fig. 1). However, the resolution is currently inadequate to differentiate between grades of dysplasia.
The implementation of swept-source spectral OCT and Fourier domain OCT systems has increased the sensitivity of the technique over the original time domain systems [34, 35]. These developments have led to faster acquisition times so that 3D volumetric data sets may now be recorded in a matter of seconds if the appropriate scanning mechanism is used [36]. The data may then be visualised by rendering transverse images (similar to conventional histopathology), or en-face images, increasing the flexibility of these clinical systems, and the short time required makes large-organ imaging a possibility. OCT is thus emerging as a technique that may aid early bronchoscopic diagnosis of microinvasive pathological lesions, and as it appears to image sufficiently deeply to identify alveolar structures, it may have future potential in the investigation of DLD.
Confocal Laser Fluorescence Endomicroscopy
The recent miniaturisation of the confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) now enables in situ imaging of a very thin, focused section of superficial tissue. For in vivo confocal imaging of the gastrointestinal tract, the scanning mirrors and miniature objective lens can be integrated within an endoscope [37]; this arrangement is known as “distal scanning.” Alternatively, the mirrors and lens are housed within an external box on the endoscope stack, thus allowing the confocal laser pulses to be directed into the patient via thousands of optical fibres [38]. This configuration is known as “proximal scanning” or “fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy” [39]. The optical fibres are wrapped in a narrow sheath, enabling the resultant probe to be inserted down the biopsy channel of a conventional endoscope. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) has been adapted for bronchoscopy; the only commercial system being the Cellvizio-Lung® (Mauna Kea Technologies, France) (Fig. 2a). The 1.4-mm-diameter probe shines a 488-nm-wavelength blue excitation laser light at the tissue to be imaged and any radiation between 500 and 650 nm from fluorescing tissue is collected at 12 frames per second. This creates a near histological quality image but only to a tissue depth of approximately 50 μm and with a lateral resolution of 3.5 μm, significantly better than that of OCT. Whilst the field of view is only 600 × 500 μm, if the probe can be slid slowly over the biopsy site, software can “stitch” adjacent images together to create a more representative mosaic of the tissue being analysed [40]. In peripheral optical biopsy the probe is inserted blindly beyond the videobronchoscopic view until it is lodged and a relatively fixed alveolar image is obtained. The potential for tissue mosaicing is therefore greater in the less constraining central airways, but the gentle and smooth manipulation that is required remains ergonomically challenging due to cardiorespiratory and patient movement and the understanding that good imaging requires the sometimes awkward task of perpendicular probe abutment with the tissue.
CLSM imaging of most epithelial surfaces within the body requires the topical or intravenous administration of an exogenous fluorescent contrast agent such as fluorescein or acriflavine. However, elastin acts as an endogenous fluorophore and it is abundant both within the basement membrane of the bronchial tree (Fig. 2b) and as a structural connective tissue component of the alveolar walls. Analysis of the spectral emission shape has demonstrated that these structures are responsible for the images created by pCLE without exogenous contrast during bronchoscopy [39]. Thiberville et al. [39] described five distinct lattice arrangements of the connective tissue fibres of the normal basement membrane in separate areas of the bronchial tree, with small openings present down to the lobar divisions, representing bronchial gland openings. These regular structures became disorganised and the intensity of the fluorescing signal diminished when overlying malignant and premalignant epithelium was present. Early work suggests that nonmalignant disease also affects the basement membrane appearance during pCLE [41, 42]; for example, the bronchial carina of a patient with sarcoidosis produced a granulomatosis-like image [39]. To image the respiratory epithelium overlying the basement membrane, a contrast agent must be used: early work suggests that physiological pH cresyl violet applied topically [43] is more effective than intravenous fluorescein [44].
A “distal scanning” confocal endomicroscope prototype was recently constructed [45]. At 6.2-mm diameter without facility for white light imaging, it requires rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthetic but has been used to image endobronchial mucosal abnormalities of larger airways using intravenous fluorescein. The major advantage of distal scanning devices over pCLE is that the distal optics allow the Z-depth of imaging to be altered during the procedure; in this case 0-200 μm below the surface, from individual ciliated epithelial cells down to submucosal smooth muscle and microvessels.
The thinnest commercially available bronchoscope containing a working channel is the Pentax FB-8 V® with a diameter of 2.7 mm, but pCLE probes can be inserted beyond this to microimage the alveolar sacs [46]. Whilst the blind insertion has similar targeting accuracy to that of bronchoscopic forceps during peripheral biopsy, limited study has shown no risk of pneumothorax [46] and only occasional transient bleeding [47], although there can be transient pain when the probe tip is close to the pleura [46, 47]. The microanatomy of the alveolar entrances, alveolar ducts, and microvessels is clearly shown (Fig. 2c), with cyclical changes in the size and shape of the structure during the breathing cycle evident. It also seems that the autofluorescence increases with age. In healthy volunteers, the visible presence of macrophages during pCLE examination appears to be specific to smokers [46]; absorption of tar is the likely cause [48]. For the many current smokers who undergo bronchoscopy, these bright macrophages act as an additional endogenous fluorophore (Fig. 2f). Early work suggests that the pCLE images of patients with advanced emphysema display fewer, more separated elastic fibres from alveolar septal walls and ducts [47, 49] (Fig. 2d, e); perhaps not surprising when elastin is depleted within alveoli affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [50].
Future pCLE work will establish the morphological differences of the elastin scaffold of the acinar structure in health and disease [51] and further the understanding of the influences that airway lesions have upon the basement membrane. Topical contrast agents will be employed to further characterise the epithelium [43, 45] and changes to it with preinvasive lesions. Intravenous contrast agents may help to establish characteristic effects of individual lung diseases on the microvasculature [52], as has been done with CLSM in the gastrointestinal tract [53]. Intravenous fluorescein may help to highlight peripheral pathology [44], or another approach has been to use pCLE at 660 nm and inject topical methylene blue (MB) into the acinus via an extended working channel [54]. The lower frequency is then able to fluoresce the MB. In the future, combinations of CLSM wavelengths may be used to provoke simultaneous autofluorescence from multiple endogenous sources to provide further information [55]. Other recent important biophotonics developments include two-photon-induced fluorescence and second harmonic generation in tissue [56]. These techniques use short pulses of infrared light to induce the signal, which both increases the penetration depth and also effectively allows more diagnostically useful high-energy excitation without using potentially harmful ultraviolet light. So far the technique has been implemented in skin inspection, but a number of research groups are working on the endoscopic implementation [57].
Endocytoscopy
The endocytoscope is a system by which real-time in vivo imaging of tissues at a cellular level can be achieved under white light conditions. It relies upon the principle of contact microscopy, where an image is seen for as long as the probe remains in contact with the tissues, and was first used for microhysteroscopy [58]. It has since been used predominantly as a research tool in the investigation of cancer in the gastrointestinal tract [59–61], and also in the urinary tract [62]. Detailed images of the nuclei allow clear distinctions between normal and malignant cells, with sharp borders between atypical and normal epithelium, differences in cellularity, and differences in the sizes and shapes of the nuclei [63]. The technique seems particularly effective in the colon and oesophagus [64].
Application of a 0.5-1% MB solution to the area of interest allows sharp visualisation of cellular structures down to the level of the nucleolus, allowing near cytological quality images to be viewed without the need for biopsy [64], and once again overcoming the degradation of tissue samples secondary to crushing at the time of biopsy or chemical preparation of histology samples. However, mucous and blood can impair the application of the contrast agent and prevent suitable images from being obtained. This can be partly overcome by the use of mucolytic agents [65].
More recently, endocytoscopy of the airways has been made possible [66] (XEC-300-U/F, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and is available either as an integrated system with normal and endocytoscope functions (Fig. 3), or as a dedicated ultrafine probe with a diameter of 3.2 mm that can be used via the biopsy channel of a larger bronchoscope [67]. Both systems have a spatial resolution of 4.2 μm and a magnification of ×570, with fields of view of 400 × 400 μm and 300 × 300 μm, respectively.
Unlike pCLE, endocytoscope images are in colour (Fig. 4), but the lack of depth of field (similar to pCLE; up to a maximum of 50 μm) with endocytoscopy essentially offers a two-dimensional view of the tissue surface, whereas pCLE builds a limited three-dimensional digital image of the target tissues, as is demonstrated when simultaneously imaging the walls of multiple alveolar sacs branching off the alveolar duct. The smaller size of the pCLE probe also allows for more distal imaging. Current practice enables imaging of only the elastin fibres with 488-nm pCLE, but by using contrast agents, cellular information may be gleaned to complement the cytological and histological analysis that is proposed with the endocytoscope. Indeed, early work suggests that in vivo endocytoscopic images of endobronchial tumours, sprayed with MB, resemble conventional histology, with an increase in cellular density, polymorphic cells, and an increased nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio when compared to images of normal mucosa [67, 68].
Conclusion
At present, the advanced imaging modalities discussed here are utilised largely as research tools, but as experience is gained and the techniques become more widely available, there is the real possibility of reliable, in vivo diagnosis of abnormalities in any easily accessible hollow organ. This is especially exciting in the field of respiratory medicine, as current diagnostic methods, such as transbronchial and transthoracic biopsy, entail appreciable risk to subjects whose lung function is often already severely abnormal.
The expense of these new “optical biopsy” technologies and the possible risks of additional time required to perform them may be justified if technological advancements enable them to show impact in certain areas. In the future, if more extensive clinical trials can establish comparable sensitivity and specificity to histopathology, they may be an adjunct to autofluorescence bronchoscopy, enhancing its specificity and ensuring higher-yield endobronchial biopsy samples. They may have a role in the monitoring of dysplastic airway lesions, as the natural history of these is poorly understood and it is appreciated that many will spontaneously regress. Monitoring the natural history of an epithelial lesion after conventional biopsy is difficult because of possible scarring, and there is a potential for entirely removing the lesion within the biopsy hook or possibly inducing spontaneous regression. The patient may be exposed to unnecessary risk with repeated biopsies for a lesion that may never progress to malignancy. Optical biopsy may also eliminate the risks associated with diagnosis of DLDs using transbronchial and surgical biopsies in high-risk patient populations, and then enable repeated alveoscopy to follow the microscopic temporal changes of DLD with or without treatment [69, 70]. These techniques may also improve the speed of diagnosis, allowing earlier treatment and reducing patient anxiety.
References
Wells AU (2004) Histopathologic diagnosis in diffuse lung disease: an ailing gold standard. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170:828–829
Izbicki G, Shitrit D, Yarmolovsky A, Bendayan D, Miller G, Fink G, Mazar A, Kramer MR (2006) Is routine chest radiography after transbronchial biopsy necessary?: a prospective study of 350 cases. Chest 129:1561–1564
Hanson RR, Zavala DC, Rhodes ML, Keim LW, Smith JD (1976) Transbronchial biopsy via flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope; results in 164 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 114:67–72
Smyth CM, Stead RJ (2002) Survey of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the United Kingdom. Eur Respir J 19:458–463
Andersen HA (1978) Transbronchoscopic lung biopsy for diffuse pulmonary diseases. Results in 939 patients. Chest 73:734–736
O’Brien JD, Ettinger NA, Shevlin D, Kollef MH (1997) Safety and yield of transbronchial biopsy in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 25:440–446
Herth FJ, Becker HD, Ernst A (2002) Aspirin does not increase bleeding complications after transbronchial biopsy. Chest 122:1461–1464
Soubani AO (2008) The evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Postgrad Med J 84:459–466
Jimenez MF (2001) Prospective study on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the resection of pulmonary nodules: 209 cases from the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Study Group. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19:562–565
Elston WJ, Whittaker AJ, Khan LN, Flood-Page P, Ramsay C, Jeffery PK, Barnes NC (2004) Safety of research bronchoscopy, biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage in asthma. Eur Respir J 24:375–377
Dhillon DP, Haslam PL, Townsend PJ, Primett Z, Collins JV, Turner-Warwick M (1986) Bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with interstitial lung diseases: side effects and factors affecting fluid recovery. Eur J Respir Dis 68:342–350
Lam S, Hung JY, Kennedy SM, Leriche JC, Vedal S, Nelems B, Macaulay CE, Palcic B (1992) Detection of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ by ratio fluorometry. Am Rev Respir Dis 146:1458–1461
Beamis JF Jr, Ernst A, Simoff M, Yung R, Mathur P (2004) A multicenter study comparing autofluorescence bronchoscopy to white light bronchoscopy using a non-laser light stimulation system. Chest 125:148S–149S
Edell E, Lam S, Pass H, Miller YE, Sutedja T, Kennedy T, Loewen G, Keith RL, Gazdar A (2009) Detection and localization of intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma using fluorescence-reflectance bronchoscopy: an international, multicenter clinical trial. J Thorac Oncol 4:49–54
Haussinger K, Becker H, Stanzel F, Kreuzer A, Schmidt B, Strausz J, Cavaliere S, Herth F, Kohlhäufl M, Müller KM, Huber RM, Pichlmeier U, ChT Bolliger (2005) Autofluorescence bronchoscopy with white light bronchoscopy compared with white light bronchoscopy alone for the detection of precancerous lesions: a European randomised controlled multicentre trial. Thorax 60:496–503
Vincent BD, Fraig M, Silvestri GA (2007) A pilot study of narrow-band imaging compared to white light bronchoscopy for evaluation of normal airways and premalignant and malignant airways disease. Chest 131:1794–1799
Shibuya K, Hoshino H, Chiyo M, Iyoda A, Yoshida S, Sekine Y, Iizasa T, Saitoh Y, Baba M, Hiroshima K, Ohwada H, Fujisawa T (2003) High magnification bronchovideoscopy combined with narrow band imaging could detect capillary loops of angiogenic squamous dysplasia in heavy smokers at high risk for lung cancer. Thorax 58:989–995
Yamada G, Takahashi H, Shijubo N, Itoh T, Abe S (2005) Subepithelial microvasculature in large airways observed by high-magnification bronchovideoscope. Chest 128:876–880
Bard MP, Amelink A, Skurichina M, Noordhoek Hegt V, Duin RP, Sterenborg HJ, Hoogsteden HC, Aerts JG (2006) Optical spectroscopy for the classification of malignant lesions of the bronchial tree. Chest 129:995–1001
Chao TY, Lie CH, Chung YH, Wang JL, Wang YH, Lin MC (2006) Differentiating peripheral pulmonary lesions based on images of endobronchial ultrasonography. Chest 130:1191–1197
Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S, Nishisaka T (2002) Analysis of the internal structure of peripheral pulmonary lesions using endobronchial ultrasonography. Chest 122:1887–1894
Baba M, Sekine Y, Suzuki M, Yoshida S, Shibuya K, Iizasa T, Saitoh Y, Onuma EK, Ohwada H, Fujisawa T (2002) Correlation between endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) images and histologic findings in normal and tumor-invaded bronchial wall. Lung Cancer 35:65–71
Testoni PA, Mangiavillano B (2008) Optical coherence tomography in detection of dysplasia and cancer of the gastrointestinal tract and bilio-pancreatic ductal system. World J Gastroenterol 14:6444–6452
Chen J, Lee L (2007) Clinical applications and new developments of optical coherence tomography: an evidence-based review. Clin Exp Optom 90:317–335
Gambichler T, Moussa G, Sand M, Sand D, Altmeyer P, Hoffmann K (2005) Applications of optical coherence tomography in dermatology. J Dermatol Sci 40:85–94
Farooq MU, Khasnis A, Majid A, Kassab MY (2009) The role of optical coherence tomography in vascular medicine. Vasc Med 14:63–71
Kubo T, Akasaka T (2008) Recent advances in intracoronary imaging techniques: focus on optical coherence tomography. Expert Rev Med Devices 5:691–697
Yang Y, Whiteman S, Gey van Pittius D, He Y, Wang RK, Spiteri MA (2004) Use of optical coherence tomography in delineating airways microstructure: comparison of OCT images to histopathological sections. Phys Med Biol 49:1247–1255
Tearney GJ, Brezinski ME, Bouma BE, Boppart SA, Pitris C, Southern JF, Fujimoto JG (1997) In vivo endoscopic optical biopsy with optical coherence tomography. Science 276:2037–2039
Lam S, Standish B, Baldwin C, McWilliams A, leRiche J, Gazdar A, Vitkin AI, Yang V, Ikeda N, MacAulay C (2008) In vivo optical coherence tomography imaging of preinvasive bronchial lesions. Clin Cancer Res 14:2006–2011
Michel RG, Kinasewitz GT, Fung KM, Keddissi JI (2010) Optical coherence tomography as an adjunct to flexible bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a pilot study. Chest 138:984–988
Whiteman SC, Yang Y, Gey van Pittius D, Stephens M, Parmer J, Spiteri MA (2006) Optical coherence tomography: real-time imaging of bronchial airways microstructure and detection of inflammatory/neoplastic morphologic changes. Clin Cancer Res 12:813–818
Tsuboi M, Hayashi A, Ikeda N, Honda H, Kato Y, Ichinose S, Kato H (2005) Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of bronchial lesions. Lung Cancer 49:387–394
Lim H, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Huang YC, Chen Z, Wise FW (2005) Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography with a fiber laser source at 1 microm. Opt Lett 30:1171–1173
Chen Y, Aguirre AD, Hsiung PL, Desai S, Herz PR, Pedrosa M, Huang Q, Figueiredo M, Huang SW, Koski A, Schmitt JM, Fujimoto JG, Mashimo H (2007) Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of Barrett’s esophagus: preliminary descriptive clinical study correlating images with histology. Endoscopy 39:599–605
Barlis P, Schmitt JM (2009) Current and future developments in intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging. EuroIntervention 4:529–533
Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, Gnaendiger J, Enders M, Delaney P, Polglase A, McLaren W, Janell D, Thomas S, Nafe B, Galle PR, Neurath MF (2004) Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 127:706–713
Viellerobe B, Osdoit A, Cave C, Lacombe F, Loiseau S, Abrat B (2006) Mauna Kea Technologies’ F400 prototype: a new tool for in vivo microscopic imaging during endoscopy. In: Tearney GJ, Wang TD (eds) Endoscopic microscopy, vol. 6082, 60820c. SPIE
Thiberville L, Moreno-Swirc S, Vercauteren T, Peltier E, Cave C, Bourg Heckly G (2007) In vivo imaging of the bronchial wall microstructure using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:22–31
Vercauteren T, Perchant A, Malandain G, Pennec X, Ayache N (2006) Robust mosaicing with correction of motion distortions and tissue deformations for in vivo fibered microscopy. Med Image Anal 10:673–692
Newton R, Kemp S, Zoumot Z, Yang GZ, Darzi A, Shah PL (2010) An unusual case of haemoptysis. Thorax 65:309–353
Newton RC, Kemp SV, Yang GZ, Darzi A, Sheppard MN, Shah PL (2011) Tracheobronchial amyloidosis and confocal endomicroscopy. Respiration (accepted for publication)
Lane PM, Lam S, McWilliams A, Leriche JC, Anderson MW, Macaulay CE (2009) Confocal fluorescence microendoscopy of bronchial epithelium. J Biomed Opt 14:024008
Fuchs FS, Zirlik S, Hildner K, Frieser M, Ganslmayer M, Schwarz S, Uder M, Neurath MF (2011) Fluorescein-aided confocal laser endomicroscopy of the lung. Respiration 81:32–38
Musani AI, Sims M, Sareli C, Russell W, McLaren WJ, Delaney PM, Litzky LA, Panettieri RA Jr (2010) A pilot study of the feasibility of confocal endomicroscopy for examination of the human airway. J Bronchol Intervent Pulmonol 17:126–130
Thiberville L, Salaun M, Lachkar S, Dominique S, Moreno-Swirc S, Vever-Bizet C, Bourg-Heckly G (2009) Human in vivo fluorescence microimaging of the alveolar ducts and sacs during bronchoscopy. Eur Respir J 33:974–985
Newton RC, Kemp S, Elson DS, Yang G-Z, Thomas CMR, Shah PL (2010) Confocal endomicroscopy in diffuse lung diseases—initial results and future directions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:A6620
Skold CM, Hed J, Eklund A (1992) Smoking cessation rapidly reduces cell recovery in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, while alveolar macrophage fluorescence remains high. Chest 101:989–995
Keller CA, Erasmus D, Alvarez F, Wallace M (2010) Preliminary observations in the use of confocal alveolar endomicroscopy in recipients of single lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:A4316
Black PN, Ching PS, Beaumont B, Ranasinghe S, Taylor G, Merrilees MJ (2008) Changes in elastic fibres in the small airways and alveoli in COPD. Eur Respir J 31:998–1004
Salaun M, Roussel F, Hauss PA, Lachkar S, Thiberville L (2010) In vivo imaging of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis using confocal endomicroscopy. Eur Respir J 36:451–453
Peinado VI, Pizarro S, Barbera JA (2008) Pulmonary vascular involvement in COPD. Chest 134:808–814
Liu H, Li YQ, Yu T, Zhao YA, Zhang JP, Zhang JN, Guo YT, Xie XJ, Zhang TG, Desmond PV (2008) Confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo detection of microvascular architecture in normal and malignant lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:56–61
Thiberville L, Salaun M, Lachkar S, Moreno-Swirc S, Bourg-Heckly G (2008) In-vivo confocal endomicroscopy of peripheral lung nodules using 488 nm/660 nm induced fluorescence and topical methylene blue. European Respiratory Society, Berlin, pp 263s–264s
Jean F, Bourg-Heckly G, Viellerobe B (2007) Fibered confocal spectroscopy and multicolor imaging system for in vivo fluorescence analysis. Opt Express 15:4008–4017
Helmchen F, Denk W (2005) Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat Methods 2:932–940
Wu Y, Xi J, Cobb MJ, Li X (2008) Fiber-optic endomicroscopy system for high-resolution nonlinear imaging of biological tissue. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:1851–1852
Hamou J (1981) Microhysteroscopy. A new procedure and its original applications in gynecology. J Reprod Med 26:375–382
Tomizawa Y, Abdulla HM, Prasad GA, Wong Kee Song LM, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS, Wang KK (2009) Endocytoscopy in esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 19:273–281
Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Meucci C, Prisco A, Cipolletta F, de Gregorio A, Salvati A (2009) Endocytoscopy can identify dysplasia in aberrant crypt foci of the colorectum: a prospective in vivo study. Endoscopy 41:129–132
Fasoli A, Pugliese V, Furnari M, Gatteschi B, Truini M, Meroni E (2009) Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: correlation between endocytoscopy and histology. Endoscopy 41(2):E65–E66
Ohigashi T, Kozakai N, Mizuno R, Miyajima A, Murai M (2006) Endocytoscopy: novel endoscopic imaging technology for in-situ observation of bladder cancer cells. J Endourol 20:698–701
Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Takubo K, Kakushima N, Omata M (2008) Detailed comparison between endocytoscopy and horizontal histology of an esophageal intraepithelial squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 21:181–185
Inoue H, Kazawa T, Sato Y, Satodate H, Sasajima K, Kudo SE, Shiokawa A (2004) In vivo observation of living cancer cells in the esophagus, stomach, and colon using catheter-type contact endoscope, “Endo-Cytoscopy system”. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 14:589–594 x–xi
Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Takubo K, Kammori M, Nomura S, Kakushima N, Muraki Y, Tateishi A, Kaminishi M, Omata M (2006) Ex-vivo study of high-magnification chromoendoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract to determine the optimal staining conditions for endocytoscopy. Endoscopy 38:1115–1121
Shibuya K, Yasufuku K, Chiyo M, Nakajima T, Fujiwara T, Nagato K et al (2008) Endo-cytoscopy system is a novel endoscopic technology to visualize microscopic imaging of the tracheobronchial tree. European Respiratory Society, Berlin
Shibuya K, Fujiwara T, Yasufuku K, Alaa Rm M, Chiyo M, Nakajima T, Hoshino H, Hiroshima K, Nakatani Y, Yoshino I (2011) In vivo microscopic imaging of the bronchial mucosa using an endo-cytoscopy system. Lung Cancer (in press)
Neumann H, Vieth M, Neurath MF, Fuchs FS (2011) In vivo diagnosis of small-cell lung cancer by endocytoscopy. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.31.8097
Misumi S, Lynch DA (2006) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/usual interstitial pneumonia: imaging diagnosis, spectrum of abnormalities, and temporal progression. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3:307–314
Lesur O, Thiberville L (2009) Vers une évaluation in vivo, en temps réel, de la réparation pulmonaire dans le SDRA: une place pour la micro-imagerie de fluorescence par laser confocal? Réanimation 18:111–113
Acknowledgments
Imperial College’s pCLE hardware was partially funded by its RT-ISIS grant from the EPSRC.
Disclosures
Olympus kindly provided the RBH with a free endocytoscope system. Dr. S. Kemp is partly supported by an unconditional grant from Olympus for an unrelated research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9282-7) contains supplementary material which is available to authorized users.
pCLE imaging - fluorescent macrophages are specific to smokers (MPG 818 kb)
pCLE imaging – healthy basement membrane of right main bronchus (MPG 926 kb)
pCLE imaging – healthy lobule (MPG 3950 kb)
408_2011_9282_MOESM4_ESM.mpg
pCLE imaging of a microvessel – mosaicing increases field of view (MPG 2102 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newton, R.C., Kemp, S.V., Shah, P.L. et al. Progress Toward Optical Biopsy: Bringing the Microscope to the Patient. Lung 189, 111–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9282-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9282-7