Abstract
Purpose
To determine the prevalence of malignant and premalignant endometrial polyps and to investigate the association of malignancy with specific factors.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of women submitted to hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps between January 2005 and July 2013 at a university hospital in southern Brazil. Data regarding clinical characteristics and pathology findings were collected from patient charts.
Results
Of 359 patients, 87.2 % had benign polyps and 9.9 % had hyperplasia without atypia. Atypical hyperplasia was found in 2.6 % of the sample. Endometrial adenocarcinoma was found in one woman (0.3 %). A correlation was observed between malignant/premalignant polyps and patient age, menopausal status, and uterine bleeding. All patients with malignancies/premalignancies had abnormal uterine bleeding. Higher frequency of malignant polyps was observed in tamoxifen users, however, without statistical significance (p = 0.059 %). Malignancy was not correlated with arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hormone therapy, endometrial thickness, and polyp diameter.
Conclusions
Malignant/premalignant findings had low prevalence and were absent in asymptomatic patients. From the data of this retrospective study, it is unclear whether routine polypectomy should be performed in asymptomatic patients. Further prospective studies including larger numbers of patients are required to guide treatment recommendations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Endometrial polyps are overgrowths of stroma and glands that project into the uterine cavity. Even though they are usually asymptomatic, endometrial polyps may cause abnormal uterine bleeding. In women experiencing abnormal bleeding, the prevalence of endometrial polyps ranges from 13 to 50 % [1]. However, because these polyps are usually asymptomatic, their actual prevalence in the general population remains unknown. Also, the pathogenesis of endometrial polyps has not been elucidated. Nevertheless, there is evidence of a genetic basis linked to changes in chromosomes 6 and 12 [2]. Other studies have shown that changes in protein p63 expression [3], the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors [4], and endometrial aromatase expression all play a role in the pathogenesis of endometrial polyps [5].
The literature shows that endometrial polyps are associated with endometrial hyperplasia and carcinogenesis [6], with a reported prevalence of malignant and premalignant lesions ranging from 0 to 12.9 % [6–12]. The role of several factors—including menopausal status, age, obesity, hypertension, use of hormone therapy or tamoxifen, polyp diameter, and presence of symptoms (most notably abnormal bleeding) [8, 11, 13, 14]—in premalignant and malignant transformation has been considered, with conflicting results. In addition, some well-known risk factors for endometrial cancer have also been associated with the presence of endometrial polyps, such as older age and obesity [15].
The widespread use of transvaginal ultrasound has led to an increase in the number of endometrial polyps detected in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, and routine polypectomy has become a matter of debate [7, 10, 16]. Even though performed in an outpatient setting, hysteroscopic polypectomy, the surgical treatment of choice for endometrial polyps, is associated with cost, need for trained professionals, and, as with all surgical procedures, some degree of risk.
The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of malignant and premalignant lesions in women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometrial polyps submitted to hysteroscopic polypectomy, as well as to investigate the association of malignant and premalignant transformation with risk factors described in the literature (age, menopausal status, uterine bleeding, use of hormone or tamoxifen therapy, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, polyp size, and endometrial thickness).
Methods
This retrospective study included all hysteroscopic procedures for resection of endometrial polyps performed between January 1, 2005 and July 30, 2013 at a university hospital (Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, HCPA) in Brazil, and whose data were available from the institution’s surgical database.
Data regarding age, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, use of hormone or tamoxifen therapy, systemic hypertension (SH), diabetes mellitus (DM) as well as ultrasonographic findings of endometrial thickness and suspected endometrial polyps were collected from the patients’ charts. Women who had been amenorrheic for at least 12 months were categorized as postmenopausal. Abnormal uterine bleeding was defined as any postmenopausal bleeding or premenopausal bleeding that was different from the usual pattern.
Hysteroscopic resections were performed under general anesthesia with a 10 mm, 30° Hamou hysteroscope. The uterine cavity was distended with mannitol. The cervical canal and the endometrial cavity were examined. All lesions were hysteroscopically resected using a monopolar cautery hook.
Histological evaluation was performed by a pathologist according to institutional protocols. Polyps were classified as benign (functional, non-functional or atrophic, hyperplastic without atypia), premalignant (with simple or complex atypical hyperplasia), or malignant (endometrial carcinoma).
The protocol was approved by the HCPA research ethics committee. Signature for informed consent form was not required given the retrospective nature of the study.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative variables were described as means and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. Qualitative variables were described as absolute or relative frequencies. Student’s t test was used to compare group means. In case of asymmetry, Mann–Whitney test was used. To compare group proportions, Pearson’s Chi square or Fisher’s exact test were employed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Significance was established at 5 % (p ≤ 0.05). All analyses were carried out using SPSS 18.0.
Results
We analyzed data from 359 women submitted to hysteroscopic polypectomy. The mean age of patients was 53.0 ± 11.7 years (mean ± SD), and 178 (51.4 %) were postmenopausal. Among postmenopausal patients, the median time since menopause was 132 months (interquartile range 60–231 months). The frequency of abnormal bleeding was 77.38 % in premenopausal patients and 64.6 % in postmenopausal patients, with an overall frequency of 70.8 %. The demographic characteristics of the sample are described in Table 1.
Benign polyps were identified in 87.2 % of the cases (Fig. 1). Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia was found in 33 patients (9.9 %), atypical hyperplasia in 9 patients (2.6 %) and endometrial carcinoma in 1 patient (0.3 %). The patient diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma came to the HCPA emergency room with ascites and pleural effusion from carcinoma of unknown primary site. Hysteroscopy was performed and the pathology diagnosis was polypoid adenocarcinoma. In five cases (1.39 %), the histologic result was not available because the procedure was stopped before excision of the lesion (one cardiorespiratory arrest during anesthesia induction and four perforations identified at the start of hysteroscopy).
Regarding the evaluation of factors potentially associated with endometrial malignancy, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups with and without malignancy in menopausal status, age and presence of bleeding. In ten patients with malignant and premalignant findings, nine (90 %) were postmenopausal vs. 168 (51.1 %) of 342 patients with benign polyps (p = 0.021). All patients with malignant or atypical findings had bleeding; in contrast, premenopausal bleeding was observed in 73.9 % s (p = 1.00) and postmenopausal bleeding in 65.1 % (p = 0.031) of those with benign polyps. The mean age was 64.7 ± 10.7 years for patients with malignant and premalignant lesions and 52.7 ± 11.6 years for women with benign lesions (p = 0.001) (Table 2).
The evaluation of bleeding as a predictor of malignant or premalignant lesions revealed sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI = 72.25–100 %), specificity of 29.67 % (95 % CI = 25.05–34.76 %), negative predictive value of 100 % (95 % CI = 99.46–100 %) and positive predictive value of 4 % (95 % CI = 2.22–7.29 %).
When the results were grouped according to type of lesion (benign vs. malignant/premalignant), no differences were observed between the groups regarding time since menopause, presence of DMor SH, BMI, endometrial thickness, size of polyp on ultrasound or use of hormone therapy. Malignant/premalignant lesions were more frequent in users of tamoxifen; however, the difference was not statistically significant (30 % for malignant/premalignant vs. 8.8 % for benign, p = 0.059). The distribution of benign vs. malignant/premalignant histology between pre- and postmenopausal patients is shown in Table 3.
In 88.6 % of the cases, hysteroscopy was performed without complications (Table 4). The most frequent complication was need for antibiotic treatment (5.6 %), because of uterine perforation/creation of false cervical passage (4.5 %). Antibiotics were used in the treatment of any type of postoperative infection, including pelvic, vaginal, respiratory tract and urinary tract infections, and were prescribed according to the results of clinical evaluation at the postoperative review (first few days after surgery) rather than to an institutional protocol for this purpose. Three patients experienced major transoperative complications: one had cardiorespiratory arrest on anesthesia induction, with resuscitation in the operating room and admission to the ICU, where she remained for 3 days. Another patient had uterine perforation with need for exploratory laparotomy and partial colon resection. The third major complication occurred in the patient with advanced metastatic cancer who developed abdominal sepsis after hysteroscopy. She was submitted to exploratory laparotomy and blood transfusion and died 12 days after the procedure. Complications were reported based on clinical data from the patients’ medical records. No routine laboratory screening tests were performed for the diagnosis of water intoxication.
Discussion
In the present study, the prevalence of premalignant and malignant lesions (2.9 % overall, with atypical hyperplasia in 2.6 % and adenocarcinoma in 0.3 %) was within the range described in the literature (0–12.9 %) [6–10, 12, 17–19]. Previous reports show significantly higher risk of malignancy in older patients, especially after menopause [6, 7, 10–12, 14, 16, 20–22]. Again, our results are in agreement with the literature, since nine of our ten patients with malignant/premalignant lesions were postmenopausal. Only one patient was premenopausal, but also experienced abnormal bleeding. Bleeding is the most important predictor of malignancy in endometrial polyps [10, 14, 16, 19, 20, 23, 24].
We did not observe a relationship between malignancy and ultrasonographic endometrial thickness and polyp size. Similarly, there was no correlation between malignancy and comorbidities (DMand SH), BMI or use of hormone therapy. The observed increase in the frequency of malignant and premalignant lesions in patients taking tamoxifen was obvious, but not statistically significant (p = 0.059). Despite the association between tamoxifen use and breast cancer [25, 26], no published data are available showing a similar association with malignant polyps.
The treatment of asymptomatic polyps is controversial. Some observational studies have reported similar frequencies of malignancy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, favoring resection, especially after menopause [1, 6–8, 11, 21, 22, 27]. Nevertheless, based on retrospective data from all hysteroscopic polypectomy procedures performed over an 8-year period as well as on previous reports in which there was no association between asymptomatic polyps and malignancy [10, 14, 16, 18, 20, 23, 24], we question the routine surgical removal of asymptomatic polyps.
The decision to submit asymptomatic patients to surgical hysteroscopy must take into account the associated risk. The frequency of uncomplicated hysteroscopic polypectomy in our sample was 88.6 %, as previously reported [28, 29]. However, severe complications did occur in 0.9 % of the patients. These facts must be weighed against the low probability of a malignant/premalignant finding in asymptomatic patients.
In conclusion, based on the present evidence, routine indication for hysteroscopic polypectomy in asymptomatic patients is unclear. Because the natural course of endometrial polyps is still unknown, as are the factors contributing to malignancy, further prospective studies including larger numbers of patients are required to guide treatment recommendations.
References
Tjarks M, Van Voorhis BJ (2000) Treatment of endometrial polyps. Obstet Gynecol 96:886–889
Vanni R, Dal Cin P, Marras S, Moerman P, Andria M, Valdes E, Deprest J, Van den Berghe H (1993) Endometrial polyp: another benign tumor characterized by 12q13-q15 changes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 68:32–33
Nogueira AA, Sant’Ana de Almeida EC, Poli Neto OB, Zambelli Ramalho LN, Rosa e Silva JC, Candido dos Reis FJ (2006) Immunohistochemical expression of p63 in endometrial polyps: evidence that a basal cell immunophenotype is maintained. Menopause 13:826–830
Sant’Ana de Almeida EC, Nogueira AA, Candido dos Reis FJ, Zambelli Ramalho LN, Zucoloto S (2004) Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in endometrial polyps and adjacent endometrium in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 49:229–233
Makris N, Kalmantis K, Skartados N, Papadimitriou A, Mantzaris G, Antsaklis A (2007) Three-dimensional hysterosonography vs. hysteroscopy for the detection of intracavitary uterine abnormalities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 97:6–9
Savelli L, De Iaco P, Santini D, Rosati F, Ghi T, Pignotti E, Bovicelli L (2003) Histopathologic features and risk factors for benignity, hyperplasia, and cancer in endometrial polyps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:927–931
Ben-Arie A, Goldchmit C, Laviv Y, Levy R, Caspi B, Huszar M, Dgani R, Hagay Z (2004) The malignant potential of endometrial polyps. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115:206–210
Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Sandvik L, Jorgensen H, Langebrekke A, Istre O (2007) Hysteroscopic resection of symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:189–194
Papadia A, Gerbaldo D, Fulcheri E, Ragni N, Menoni S, Zanardi S, Brusaca B (2007) The risk of premalignant and malignant pathology in endometrial polyps: should every polyp be resected? Minerva Ginecol 59:117–124
Antunes A Jr, Costa-Paiva L, Arthuso M, Costa JV, Pinto-Neto AM (2007) Endometrial polyps in pre- and postmenopausal women: factors associated with malignancy. Maturitas 57:415–421
Lieng M, Istre O, Qvigstad E (2010) Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:992–1002
Wang JH, Zhao J, Lin J (2010) Opportunities and risk factors for premalignant and malignant transformation of endometrial polyps: management strategies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:53–58
Ayida G, Kennedy S, Barlow D, Chamberlain P (1996) Contrast sonography for uterine cavity assessment: a comparison of conventional two-dimensional with three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound; a pilot study. Fertil Steril 66:848–850
Uglietti A, Mazzei C, Deminico N, Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Fedele L (2014) Endometrial polyps detected at ultrasound and rate of malignancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:839–843
Serhat E, Cogendez E, Selcuk S, Asoglu MR, Arioglu PF, Eren S (2014) Is there a relationship between endometrial polyps and obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension? Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:937–941
Shushan A, Revel A, Rojansky N (2004) How often are endometrial polyps malignant? Gynecol Obstet Invest 58:212–215
Anastasiadis PG, Koutlaki NG, Skaphida PG, Galazios GC, Tsikouras PN, Liberis VA (2000) Endometrial polyps: prevalence, detection, and malignant potential in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 21:180–183
Ferrazzi E, Zupi E, Leone FP, Savelli L, Omodei U, Moscarini M, Barbieri M, Cammareri G, Capobianco G, Cicinelli E, Coccia ME, Donarini G, Fiore S, Litta P, Sideri M, Solima E, Spazzini D, Testa AC, Vignali M (2009) How often are endometrial polyps malignant in asymptomatic postmenopausal women? A multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(235):e231–e236
Famuyide AO, Breitkopf DM, Hopkins MR, Laughlin-Tommaso SK (2014) Asymptomatic thickened endometrium in postmenopausal women: malignancy risk. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:782–786
Machtinger R, Korach J, Padoa A, Fridman E, Zolti M, Segal J, Yefet Y, Goldenberg M, Ben-Baruch G (2005) Transvaginal ultrasound and diagnostic hysteroscopy as a predictor of endometrial polyps: risk factors for premalignancy and malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:325–328
Wethington SL, Herzog TJ, Burke WM, Sun X, Lerner JP, Lewin SN, Wright JD (2011) Risk and predictors of malignancy in women with endometrial polyps. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3819–3823
Baiocchi G, Manci N, Pazzaglia M, Giannone L, Burnelli L, Giannone E, Fratini D, Di Renzo GC (2009) Malignancy in endometrial polyps: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(462):e461–e464
Costa-Paiva L, Godoy CE Jr, Antunes A Jr, Caseiro JD, Arthuso M, Pinto-Neto AM (2011) Risk of malignancy in endometrial polyps in premenopausal and postmenopausal women according to clinicopathologic characteristics. Menopause 18:1278–1282
Fernandez-Parra J, Rodriguez Oliver A, Lopez Criado S, Parrilla Fernandez F, Montoya Ventoso F (2006) Hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial polyps. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:144–148
Hu R, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Clarke R (2015) Molecular mechanisms of tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancer (review). Oncol Lett 9:1495–1501
Bland AE, Calingaert B, Secord AA, Lee PS, Valea FA, Berchuck A, Soper JT, Havrilesky L (2009) Relationship between tamoxifen use and high risk endometrial cancer histologic types. Gynecol Oncol 112:150–154
DeWaay DJ, Syrop CH, Nygaard IE, Davis WA, Van Voorhis BJ (2002) Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 100:3–7
Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y (2005) Hysteroscopic polypectomy in 240 premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 83:705–709
Cravello L, Stolla V, Bretelle F, Roger V, Blanc B (2000) Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps: a study of 195 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93:131–134
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors have had full control of all primary data and they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested. The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Azevedo, J.M., de Azevedo, L.M., Freitas, F. et al. Endometrial polyps: when to resect?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293, 639–643 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3854-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3854-3