Abstract
Introduction
The aim of our analysis is to assess gender differences in baseline characteristics, acute therapies, and clinical outcome in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Methods
The Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction PLUS registry (MITRA PLUS) is a German prospective, multicenter, observational data pool of current treatment of STEMI.
Results
STEMI was more often (P < 0.0001) complicated by cardiogenic shock in female patients (12.9%) when compared to male patients (9.3%). This was still true after adjusting for confounding variables (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.30). Women with STEMI admitted in a cardiogenic shock were older (P < 0.0001) and had more often concomitant diseases (P < 0.0001). There was no differences in rates of reperfusion therapy (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77–1.09). Hospital mortality was 67.7% in female patients, when compared to 57.2% in male patients (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis hospital mortality did not differ between men and women (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98–1.38). Early reperfusion therapy was associated with a significant reduction of hospital mortality in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.90) with primary PCI being more effective than thrombolytic therapy (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68).
Conclusion
In women, STEMI was more often complicated by cardiogenic shock when compared to men. However, the use of early reperfusion therapy did not differ between the sexes. Primary PCI was associated with the best outcome in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock and is therefore the therapy of choice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women and in men. Coronary heart disease occurs about 10 years later in women than in men [1, 2]. Numerous studies consistently demonstrated that unadjusted rates of mortality during hospitalization or during the first 30 days after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are higher in women [3–5]. However, there are conflicting data about gender differences of mortality after adjusting for confounding variables [6–9]. In addition, some studies found a lower use of an invasive strategy in women than in men [10–12], whereas others found no evidence for sex-related differences in the use of early reperfusion therapy [13, 14]. Cardiogenic shock is the major cause of death in female and male patients with STEMI [15–17]. Little is known about the impact of gender on outcome of cardiogenic shock. Early reperfusion therapy has improved survival of patients with STEMI [18–20] complicated by cardiogenic shock markedly and is therefore recommended by the European Society of Cardiology [21], the American College of Cardiology, and the American Heart Association [22]. The aim of this study is to assess gender differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcome in patients with acute STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock. In addition we aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of early reperfusion therapy in those patients.
Methods
MITRA Plus registry
The MITRA Plus registry is a German prospective, multicenter, observational data pool of current treatment of patients with STEMI. From 1992 to 2002, 36,643 consecutive patients with STEMI were included in the MITRA Plus registry. The MITRA Plus registry consists of four consecutive sub-registries that have been previously described: 60 min Myocardial Infarction Project (60 min MIP) [23], Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) [24], the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) [25], and the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) registry [26].
The present investigation is an analysis of consecutive patients with STEMI < 24 h complicated by cardiogenic shock. Patients were recruited from 217 hospitals in Germany, mainly community hospitals.
Definitions
STEMI was diagnosed in the presence of the two following criteria: (1) persistent angina pectoris for ≥20 min and ST-segment elevation of ≥1 mm in ≥2 standard leads or ≥2 mm in ≥2 contiguous pre-cordial leads, or (2) persistent angina pectoris for ≥20 min and the presence of a left bundle branch block. ST-elevation AMI was later confirmed by an increase in cardiac enzymes to more than twice the upper limit of normal. Mortality, non-fatal re-infarction and non-fatal stroke were defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).
The diagnosis of cardiogenic shock was made by the treating physicians in patients with hypotension (<100 mmHg), heart rate >100/bpm, dyspnoea and reduction in urine output. In addition we included patients needing catecholamine support.
Data collection and statistical analysis
Data concerning the early intra-hospital period (first 48 h) were collected by use of a record form within the first 2–3 days at the intensive care unit. Clinical events after the initial period until hospital discharge were registered on a separate record form. All data sheets were sent to the central data center (Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany) for uniform monitoring, registration, and data processing.
Absolute numbers, percentages, medians, and quartiles were computed to describe the patient population. Categorical variables were compared by using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and calculating the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate clinical outcomes (hospital mortality and hospital mortality/re-infarction/stroke [MACCE]). In the multivariate analysis the following variables were included: age, previous myocardial infarction, previous stroke, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, impaired renal function, and prehospital delay.
Results
For this study, we evaluated 36,643 patients with STEMI of the MITRA Plus registry. 24,471 (66.8%) of those patients were male and 12,172 (33.2%) were female. STEMI was more often (P < 0.0001) complicated by cardiogenic shock in female patients (12.9%) when compared to male patients (9.3%). This was still true after adjusting for confounding variables (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.30).
Clinical characteristics and adjunctive medication:
Baseline characteristics and adjunctive medication of female and male patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The baseline characteristics of the two groups differed markedly.
Female patients were older (P < 0.0001), had more often a history of systemic hypertension (P < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.0001), and prior stroke (P < 0.01). In addition women had more often a prehospital delay of more than 3 h. On the other hand, female patients had less often a history of myocardial infarction (P < 0.0001) and percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft (P < 0.001). There was no difference in concomitant medical treatment with aspirin, clopidogrel, and statins.
Reperfusion therapy
49.9% of the female and 62.7% of the male patients (P < 0.0001) received early reperfusion therapy within 48 h (Fig. 1). Gender differences in use of early reperfusion therapy disappeared after adjustment for confounding variables (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77–1.09).
Clinical events
Hospital mortality was 67.7% in female patients, when compared to 57.5% in male (<0.0001). There was no difference (P = 0.24) in re-infarction (6.7% female/5.2% male patients) and stroke (2.8% female/3.7% male patients; P = 0.34), whereas a significantly lower (P < 0.0001) combined endpoint (hospital mortality/re-infarction and stroke [MACCE]) was seen in male patients (Table 3). After adjusting for confounding variables the multivariate analysis showed (Table 4) that hospital mortality in female patients did not differ significantly from male patients (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98–1.38). Hospital mortality and combined endpoint (hospital mortality/re-infarction/stroke [MACCE]) were lower in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing reperfusion therapy when compared to female patients not receiving early reperfusion therapy (Table 5). This was still true after adjusting hospital mortality for confounding variables (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.90). Hospital mortality was lower in female patients receiving primary PCI when compared to patients receiving no reperfusion therapy (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.27–0.59), whereas no difference was seen between women receiving thrombolysis and women not receiving early reperfusion therapy (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61–1-12). Primary PCI was more effective than thrombolysis in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68).
Discussion
Cardiogenic shock occurs in about 3% of patients with unstable angina and in about 2% with non-STEMI [15, 27]. STEMI is complicated by cardiogenic shock in about 4–7% [15]. In our study, STEMI was complicated by cardiogenic shock in 10.5%. The higher rate of cardiogenic shock in our study may reflect variability in the interpretation of the definition of shock. Commonly, the cutoff point for systolic blood pressure is less than 90 mmHg [16, 28], or less than 80 mmHg [15]. For our study, the diagnoses of cardiogenic shock were made by the treating physicians in patients showing the clinical picture of cardiogenic shock including hypotension (<100 mmHg), heart rate >100/bpm, dyspnoea, reduction in urine output, and basilar pulmonary rales. In addition we included patients needing catecholamine support.
STEMI was more often complicated by cardiogenic shock in female patients (12.9%) when compared to male patients (9.3%). This was still true after adjusting for confounding variables. Women and men were different in their risk profiles: female patients were older by an average of 8 years, had more often concomitant diseases and had more often a prehospital delay of more than 3 h, but were less likely to have a history of myocardial infarction. These results are in line with numerous previous studies [3, 4, 9].
49.9% of the female and 62.7% of the male patients in our study received early reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis and/or percutaneous coronary intervention) within 48 h. However, gender differences in use of early reperfusion therapy disappeared after adjustment for confounding variables. In other studies gender differences in use of early reperfusion therapy also disappeared after adjustment for confounding variables [29, 30]. Adjusted lower rates of early reperfusion therapy in female patients have been reported by other investigators [31, 32]. However, the GUSTO-I trial showed that re-vascularization in shock patients was associated with improved survival [33, 34]. The benefit was independent of several baseline variables, which were generally less favorable in patients with cardiogenic shock who did not undergo re-vascularization. Result of the SHOCK trial registry [35] showed that patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction who underwent PCI had lower in-hospital mortality rates than patients treated medically (46.4 vs. 78.0%, P < 0.001). This was still true after adjustment for patient differences. These results are in line with our results: early reperfusion therapy was associated with a significant reduction of hospital mortality in female with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, with primary PCI being more effective than thrombolytic therapy.
Despite early reperfusion therapy and supportive medication, hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock is still extraordinarily high. In GUSTO III midterm mortality of patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock treated with alteplase or reteplase and cardiogenic shock was about 60%. Hasdai et al. [17] reported that in-hospital death rate among patients with cardiogenic shock was greater than 70% from 1975 to 1990, but declined to 59% in 1997.
Consistent with most previous study [3–5] unadjusted rates of hospital mortality after STEMI were higher in women when compared to men. However, after adjusting for confounding variables the multivariate analysis showed that hospital mortality in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock did not differ from male patients. No gender differences in adjusted mortality after STEMI have already been reported by other investigators [5, 6], whereas the GUSTO-I angiographic study [36] found gender to be an independent predictor of 30-day mortality.
In summary, primary early reperfusion therapy is associated with a significant reduction in hospital mortality in female patients complicated by cardiogenic shock. Primary PCI is the therapy of first choice in those patients. Therefore, efforts should be made to establish a network between hospitals with and without angioplasty facilities to improve hospital and transportation logistics to keep the time loss from admission to primary PCI as short as possible.
Limitations
In the MITRA Plus registry treatment was left to the discretion of the physicians. This could result in selection bias, which cannot be fully eliminated by multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
In women, STEMI was more often complicated by cardiogenic shock when compared to men. However, the use of early reperfusion therapy did not differ between the sexes. Primary PCI was associated with the best outcome in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock and is therefore the therapy of choice.
References
Lerner DJ, Kannel WB (1986) Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J 111:383–390
Wingard DL, Cohn BA, Kaplan GA, Cirillo PM, Cohen RD (1989) Sex differentials in morbidity and mortality risks examined by age and cause in the same cohort. Am J Epidemiol 130:601–610
Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM, Berkman LF, Horwitz RI (1995) Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for an increased risk for women? Circulation 91(6):1861–1871
Greenland P, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourtthe U, Israeli SPRINT Investigators, Behar S (1991) In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1524 women after myocardial infarction. Circulation 83(2):484–491
Fiebach HN, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI (1990) Differences between women and men in survival after myocardial infarction: biology or methodology? JAMA 263:1092–1096
Gottlieb S, Moss AJ, McDermott M, Eberly S (1994) Comparison of posthospital survival after cute myocardial infarction in women, men. Am J Cardiol 74(7):727–730
Karlson BW, Herlitz J, Hartford M (1996) Prognosis in myocardial infarction in relation to gender. Cardiology 87(3):230–234
Maynard C, Althouse R, Cerquiera M, Olsufka M, Kennedy JW (2001) Underutilization of thrombolytic therapy in eligible women with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 142(4):604–610
Heer T, Schiele R, Schneider S, Gitt AK, Wienbergen H, Gottwik M, Gieseler U, Voigtländer T, Hauptmann KE, Wagner S, Senges J (2002) Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion (the MITRA registry). Am J Cardiol 89(5):511–517
Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM (1991) Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 325:221–225
Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P et al (1991) Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 325:226–230
Gottlieb S, Harpaz D, Shotan A, Boyko V, Leor J, Cohen M, Mandelzweig L, Mazouz B, Stern S, Behar S (2000) Sex differences in management and outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the 1990s: a prospective observational community-based study. Circulation 102(20): 2484–2490
Pagley PR, Yarzebski J, Goldberg R et al (1993) Gender differences in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 153:625–629
Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS et al (1992) Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for gender bias? Ann Intern Med 116:785–790
Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS et al (1991) Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction—incidence and mortality from a community wide perspective 1975–1988. N Engl J Med 325:1117–1122
Holmes DR Jr, Bates ER, Kleiman NS et al (1995) Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:668–674
Hasdai D, Topol EJ, Califf RM et al (2000) Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes. Lancet 356(9231):749–756
Bauer T, Hoffmann R, Jünger C, Koeth O, Zahn R, Gitt A, Heer T, Bestehorn K, Senges J, Zeymer U (2009) Efficacy of a 24-h primary percutaneous coronary intervention service on outcome in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice. Clin Res Cardiol 98(3):171–178
Koeth O, Bauer T, Wienbergen H, Gitt AK, Juenger C, Zeymer U, Hauptmann KE, Glunz HG, Sechtem U, Senges J, Zahn R, Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Plus (MITRA Plus) Study Group (2009) Angioplasty within 24 h after thrombolysis in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: current use, predictors and outcome. Results of the MITRA plus registry. Clin Res Cardiol 98(2):107–113
Meneveau N, Séronde MF, Descotes-Genon V, Dutheil J, Chopard R, Ecarnot F, Briand F, Bernard Y, Schiele F, Bassand JP (2009) Immediate versus delayed angioplasty in infarct-related arteries with TIMI III flow and ST segment recovery: a matched comparison in acute myocardial infarction patients. Clin Res Cardiol 98(4):257–264
Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KA, Julian D, Lengyel M, Neumann FJ, Ruzyllo W, Thygesen C, Underwood SR, Vahanian A, Verheugt FW, Wijns W, Task force on the management of acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (2003) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The task force on the management of acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 24(1):28–66
Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, 2004 Writing Committee Members, Anbe DT, Kushner FG, Ornato JP, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW (2008) 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration With the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Writing on Behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee. Circulation 117(2):296–329
Rustige J, Schiele R, Burczyk U, Koch A, Gottwik M, Neuhauss KL, Tebbe U, Uebis R, Senges J (1997) The 60 minutes Myocardial Infarction Project. Treatment and clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Germany. Eur Heart J 18:1438–1446
Schuster S, Koch A, Burczyk U, Schiele R, Glunz HG, Voigtlander T, Limbourg P, Stuby K, Berg G, Gieseler U, Jakob M, Hauptmann P, Senges J (1999) Use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction in Germany: a comparison of daily clinical practice with international guidelines. MITRA Study. Z Kardiol 88(10):795–801
Wagner S, Schneider S, Schiele R, Fischer F, Dehn H, Grube R, Becker G, Baumgartel B, Altmann E, Senges J (1999) Acute myocardial infarction in Germany between 1996 and 1998: therapy and intrahospital course. Results of the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) in Germany. Kardiol 88(10):857–867
Zeymer U, Gitt AK, Jünger C, Heer T, Wienbergen H, Koeth O, Bauer T, Mark B, Zahn R, Gottwik M, Senges J, Acute COronary Syndromes (ACOS) registry investigators (2006) Effect of clopidogrel on 1-year mortality in hospital survivors of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 27(22):2661–2666
Holmes DR Jr, Berger PB, Hochman JS et al (1999) Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation 100:2067–2073
Hasdai D, Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ et al (1999) Frequency and clinical outcome of cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction among patients receiving reteplase or alteplase: results from GUSTO III. Eur Heart J 20:128–135
Oka RK, Fortmann SP, Varady AN (1996) Differences in treatment of acute myocardial infarction by sex, age, and other factors (the Stanford Five-City Project). Am J Cardiol 78:861–865
Funk M, Griffey KA (1995) Relation of gender to the use of cardiac procedures in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 76:226–229
Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O’Dowd K (1994) Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction—a statewide study. Circulation 90:1715–1730
Wong CC, Froelicher ES, Bacchetti P, Barron HV, Gee L, Selby JV, Lundstrom R, Swain B, Truman A (1997) Influence of gender on cardiovascular mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients with high indication for coronary angiography. Circulation 96(Suppl II):II-51–II-57
Berger PB, Holmes DR Jr, Stebbins AL, Bates ER, Califf RM, Topol EJ (1997) Impact of an aggressive invasive catheterization and revascularization strategy on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) Trial: an observational study. Circulation 96:122–127 View Record in Scopus|Cited By in Scopus (136)
Berger PB, Tuttle RH, Holmes DR Jr et al (1999) One-year survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and its relation to early revascularization: results from the GUSTO-I trial. Circulation 99:873–878
Webb JG, Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Carere RG, Buller CE, Slater JN, Baran KW, Koller PT, Talley JD, Porway M, Hochman JS, SHOCK Investigators (2001) Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry. Am Heart J 141(6):964–970
Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, Weaver D, Betrin A, Col J, Simoons M, Aylward P, Van der Werfthe F, GUSTO-I Investigators, Califf RM (1995) Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 91:1659–1668
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study is conducted for the Maximal Individual Therapy In Acute Myocardial Infarction Plus (MITRA Plus) Study group.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koeth, O., Zahn, R., Heer, T. et al. Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 98, 781–786 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0080-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0080-7