Abstract
The contribution of different methanogenic precursors probably depends on vegetation in the cold Zoige peatlands. This study was carried out to elucidate the relationship between archaeal community dynamics and vegetation type over growing season. Soil samples were collected monthly during the growing season from two vegetation types (communities dominated by Carex muliensis vs. Eleocharis valleculosa) on an open fen at the Wetland National Nature Reserve of the Zoige peatlands on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Archaeal community structure was determined with terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene fragment. Methanosarcinales, Methanosaeta, Methanomicrobiales, Methanobacteriales, uncultured RC-II, and uncultured Crenarchaeota were detected in both vegetation types. The results suggested that seasonal change affects the activity rather than the structure of the archaeal community over the growing season. Ordination analyses indicated that archaeal community composition was related to vegetation type and plant height.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Natural wetlands contribute 20–30% of the total global emission of the important greenhouse gas, methane (CH4) (IPCC 2007). In anoxic wetlands, CH4 is an end product of the anaerobic degradation of organic matter by methanogenic archaea (Conrad 1999). Microbial activity is exclusively responsible for methane production in natural ecosystems (Garcia et al. 2000).
Methanogenic populations have been studied in different habitats such as fen (Galand et al. 2003), rice soil (Großkopf et al. 1998), marine and lake sediments (Koch et al. 2009), and peatlands (Cadillo-Quiroz et al. 2006). A variation in the composition of methanogenic communities among wetlands has been related to vegetation, pH, temperature, water table, and hydrology (Galand et al. 2003; Juottonen et al. 2005; Cadillo-Quiroz et al. 2006; Rooney-Varga et al. 2007; Kotiaho et al. 2010), but little is known about the spatiotemporal dynamics of methanogenic populations (Kruger et al. 2005; Wagner et al. 2005; Hoj et al. 2006; Rooney-Varga et al. 2007), especially in natural wetlands. Juottonen et al. (2008) found that archaeal community composition and size in a boreal fen varied only slightly with seasonal changes. In an Italian rice field, Kruger et al. (2005) found that the seasonal changes in the methanogenic processes were probably caused by changes in the activity rather than in the size of the methanogenic community. Watanabe et al. (2006) suggested that difference in soil type (sampling region) influenced the community structure of methanogens. Rooney-Varga et al. (2007) indicated a link between vegetation type and archaeal community composition. However, more research is needed to increase our understanding of the dynamics of methanogenic archaeal communities as related to vegetation type in natural wetlands under varying climatic and soil conditions.
The Zoige Plateau (average elevation of 3,400 m asl) on the eastern edge of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau is a “hotspot” of CH4 emission (Jin et al. 1999). It is a complete and orbicular plateau that covers an area of 2.8 × 104 km2, surrounded by a series of alpine mountains (average elevation of 4,000 m asl). Numerous alpine wetlands and lakes have developed on the plateau, accounting for 17.8% of the plateau area. During the peak growing season on the Zoige Plateau, methane emissions varied among wetland areas that differed in vegetation type (Chen et al. 2009a); this variation was found to be related to key factors including standing water table and plant community height, but its relation with the methanogenic archaea were not characterized.
Whether plant growth affects the composition of the archaeal community on the Zoige Plateau remains unclear. Methanogenic archaea and methanogenic pathway on the plateau have been studied several times (Zhang et al. 2008a, b; Jiang et al. 2010). Jiang et al. (2010) reported that the methanogenic pathway was strongly correlated with vegetation type in Zoige peatlands. Previously, studies have also demonstrated a link between vegetation type and methanogenesis pathways, but only a few have linked terminal decomposition pathways to microbial community analysis (Galand et al. 2005; Rooney-Varga et al. 2007). It is urgent to characterize the microbial communities that are responsible for these processes in order to understand how their dynamics are related to environmental and biogeochemical factors in this area, which is a sensitive area for climate change.
The objectives of the current study were to analyze the diversity of methanogenic archaeal communities in two predominant vegetation types: Carex muliensis (CM) and Eleocharis valleculosa (EV). The composition of archaeal communities was evaluated by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA genes, thus including also other groups of Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. The second aim was to quantify the relationships between environmental variables and composition of archaeal community.
Materials and methods
Site description and sample collection
Soil samples were collected from an open fen at the Wetland National Nature Reserve of Zoige (33°56′ N, 102°52′ E; 3,430 m asl). The alpine wetlands of this region cover an area of 6,180 km2, which represents 31.5% of the whole Zoige Plateau, according to the Zoige wetlands classification of Mires of the Zoige Plateau. This region is located in the cold Qinghai–Tibetan climatic zone. The mean annual precipitation is approximately 650 mm, and the mean annual temperature is 1.7°C (Chen et al. 2009b). The warmest temperatures (9.1–11.4°C) occur in July, and the coldest temperatures (−8.2 to −10.9°C) occur in January (Chen et al. 2009a). The pH values are around 6.6–7.0. Soil samples in the depth of 10–15 cm were collected monthly from June to August 2007. Each sample was represented by three soil cores, and there were 18 samples in total (three samples per month and per vegetation). Other details concerning soil sampling are provided by Zhang et al. (2008b). The samples were placed in ice chests and transported to the laboratory for immediate processing.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and phylogenetic analysis
Total DNA was extracted with a FastDNA SPIN kit for soil according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA). Guanidine thiocyanate (5.5 mM; Sigma) was used to remove PCR-inhibiting compounds (mainly humic acids) from the extraction. The archaeal 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primer pair A109f/A915r or A915r labeled at the 5′ end with 6-carboxyfluorescein (Stahl and Amann 1991). The PCR was performed as follows: a primary denaturation step of 3 min at 94°C; followed by 32 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 53°C, and 90 s at 72°C; and a final DNA synthesis for 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).
The purified 16S rRNA fragments of about 800 bp were cloned into the pUCm-T vector and sequenced by Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services (Shanghai, China). Chimera sequences of 16S rRNA genes were identified by Chimera Check of Ribosomal Database Project II (release 8.1) (Cole et al. 2005). The 16S rRNA sequences were submitted to GenBank, and a search for similar sequences was conducted using the BLAST algorithm. The best matching sequences were retrieved from the database and aligned, and a similarity analysis was performed by ClustalX (Thompson et al. 1994). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method implemented in MEGA 4.0 (Tamura et al. 2007). The topologies of the resultant tree were evaluated by bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein 1985) based on 1,000 resamplings.
Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis
The T-RFLP analysis was performed as described previously (Chin et al. 1999). Briefly, labeled purified PCR products were subjected to T-RFLP analysis with the restriction enzyme TaqI (Promega, USA) and were analyzed with an ABI Prism 373 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA). The electropherograms were analyzed with GeneScan version 2.1 (Applied Biosystems). Relative amplicon frequencies were determined based on relative signal intensities of terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) as indicated by peak heights (Lueders and Friedrich 2003). Signals with peak heights less than 100 relative fluorescence units were regarded as background noise and were excluded from the analysis. The percentages of fluorescence intensity represented by single T-RFs were calculated relative to the total fluorescence intensity of all T-RFs.
Measurement of physicochemical parameters
Total carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), and dissolved organic C (DOC) were measured according to O’Halloran (1993) by the Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science. Air temperature, soil temperature at 5- and 10-cm depths, and plant community height (the average height of vascular plants) were recorded during sampling. Acetate concentration in the pore water was measured by gas chromatography (Zhang et al. 2008b).
Ordination analyses of community composition data
To visualize the differences in the archaeal community between samples and seasons, we performed correspondence analysis (CA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) with CANOCO version 4.5 for Windows (Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA). A total of 18 samples, eight T-RFs, and six environmental variables (including temperature, vegetation type, plant community height, total nitrogen, organic matter, and DOC) were subjected to a CCA with biplot scaling focused on intersample distances.
Sequence accession numbers
The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study has been deposited in the EMBL, GenBank, and DDBJ nucleotide sequences databases under accession numbers HQ407436 to HQ407463.
Results
The figures EV6, EV7, and EV8 refer to data from E. valleculosa stands and CM6, CM7, and CM8 refer to data from C. muliensis stands both sampled in June, July, and August of 2007, respectively. One clone library of archaeal 16S rRNA genes which contained 30 clones was constructed from EV6, and one of 30 clones was generated from CM6. The sequencing analysis showed that the archaeal community consisted of Methanosarcinaceae, Methanosaeta, Methanomicrobiales, Methanobacteriales, uncultured Rice Cluster II (RC-II), and uncultured Crenarchaeotal (Fig. 1). The spatiotemporal dynamics of the archaeal community in soil was estimated using T-RFLP analyses. Based on silico analyses of clone sequences, different terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) could be assigned to different archaeal lineages as follows: 78 bp to Methanobacteriales, 86 bp to Methanomicrobiales, 182 bp to Methanosarcinaceae, 281 bp to Methanosaeta, 358 bp to Methanosarcinaceae, 387 bp to Methanomicrobiales, 488 bp to RC-II, and 735 bp to uncultured Crenarchaeota. T-RFLP patterns were similar among the soil samples regardless of sampling date and vegetation type (Fig. 2). However, the relative abundance of the T-RFs varied among months within each type of vegetation.
The predominant amplified fragment, which was 281 bp in both plant stands, had a relative abundance of 17–24% at the EV site and 23–33% at the CM site (Fig. 2). At the EV site, the next most abundant fragments were 78 and 86 bp. The relative abundance of the 182-bp fragment was less than 10% at the EV site but was between 15% and 20% at the CM site (Fig. 2).
The community dynamics were further investigated by CA of the T-RFLP data (Fig. 3). The first CA axis, which is correlated with the main compositional variation (64.7%), separated archaeal communities of CM from those of EV, indicating that the archaeal community composition in CM was distinct from that in EV (Fig. 3a). The second CA axis accounts for 18.9% of the variation which separated CM6 and CM7 data from CM8 data, and separated EV8 and EV6 data from EV7 data. Hence, the difference in T-RFLP data among the sampling dates was much smaller than the difference between the two vegetation types. Furthermore, the effect of sampling time was not significant (P = 0.08).
The analysis of the CA axis and environmental factors showed that vegetation type and plant height were negatively correlated with the CA axis one (correlation coefficient of −0.78 and −0.40, respectively; P < 0.05). Total N was correlated with the CA axis two (correlation coefficient of 0.56; P < 0.01). The temperature was not significantly correlated with any axis (P = 0.12).
The relationships between environmental variables and archaeal community composition are shown in Fig. 3b. Like CA, CCA analysis indicated that vegetation type accounted for most of the variability in archaeal community composition (P = 0.006 by Monte Carlo permutation test; Fig. 3b). After inclusion of vegetation class in the model, total N was determined as the second most important environmental variable (P = 0.02).
Discussion
In Zoige wetland, two predominant plant populations, C. muliensis (CM) and E. valleculosa (EV) covering about 95% of the whole site grow in the water. Acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogensis are two major pathways of methane production in most environments. In CM and EV, fragments of 281, 182, and 358 bp accounted for 30–60% of the total fragments, and fragments of these lengths correspond to acetoclastic methanogens (Methanosaeta and Methanosarcinaceae). Abundant Methanosaeta and Methanosarcinaceae in our samples supported Jiang et al. (2010) findings that acetoclastic methanogenesis pathway dominated in both plant stands. A similar relationship between methanogenic community structure and methanogenesis was also found in peat (Rooney-Varga et al. 2007) and fen (Galand et al. 2003). In Alaska peat, hydrogenotrophic methanogens, Methanomicrobiaceae and Methanobacteriaceae, were predominant and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was the dominant methane production pathway (Rooney-Varga et al. 2007).
With the exception of Methanosaeta and Methanosarcinaceae, RC-II, Methanomicrobiaceae, and Methanobacteriaceae existed in Zoige wetlands, and many of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of these groups were clustered with sequences from fen, bog, and paddy soil (Hales et al. 1996; Lu and Conrad 2005; Cadillo-Quiroz et al. 2006). Methanomicrobiaceae and Methanobacteriaceae are considered as hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Therefore both hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogenesis occurred in this site. Crenarchaea was less prevalent in Zoige wetland than the other abovementioned archaea and grouped with sequences from paddy soil and sediments (Inagaki et al. 2006; Conrad et al. 2008; Peng et al. 2008). However, the function of these groups is unknown.
Our result agreed with previous reports that seasonal changes in archaeal community structure were small in rice fields and mires (Kruger et al. 2005; Juottonen et al. 2008), whereas it disagreed with Chen et al. (2008), who reported significant seasonal variation of CH4 flux in both C. muliensis and E. valleculosa stands in the same region where we collected our samples. This inconsistency could be explained by several reasons. Firstly, changes in the activity rather than composition of the methanogenic community may be due to changes in sampling time. Similar results were also reported by Kruger et al. (2005). However, in Alaska peatland, Juottonen et al. (2008) reported that archaeal size and structure were similar in winter and summer. Secondly, the CH4 flux does not only depend on methanogenesis but also on CH4 oxidation at the ecosystem scale (Metje and Frenzel 2007). In Zoige wetland, probably CH4 oxidation control CH4 flux during growing season because methane oxidizer abundance and activity was controlled by soil water content (Yun et al. 2010), and Chen et al (2009a) reported that the key influence factor of CH4 flux was standing water table in the growing season of Zoige wetland.
Vegetation characteristics are likely to play an important role in biogeochemical activity (Rooney-Varga et al. 2007; Jiang et al. 2010). Our results suggested that composition of methanogenic communities was linked to vegetation type in Zoige wetlands. The composition of methanogenic communities of CM differed from that of EV probably because methanogenic community structure depends on nutrient availability (Galand et al. 2002, 2003). Nutrient availability differs in the rhizosphere of different vascular plants because different plant species produce root exudates that differ in quality and quantity (Bergman et al. 2000; Conrad et al. 2008). Root exudates are C, N, and energy sources for microorganisms. Root exudate-utilizing microbes thrive in summer but utilize recalcitrant dead plant material when plant activity ceases in winter (Lipson et al. 2002; Juottonen et al. 2008). Bergman et al. (2000) reported that different plant communities provided different quantities of substrates to methanogens and that substrate availability was associated with different seasonal changes in CH4 production. Juottonen et al. (2008) also suggested that substrate quality or quantity may induce small fluctuations in activity and composition of archaeal communities.
The increase in plant biomass can enhance CH4 production because the increased plant biomass means more C inputs to soil microorganisms including methanogens (Lindau et al. 1991; Banik et al. 1996). We have found that archaeal community composition was correlated with plant community height, which can be considered an indicator of plant biomass (Ding et al. 1999). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that plant height influences composition of methanogenic communities. Chen et al. (2008), at the same sampling site, reported that CH4 flux was related to plant height. Over the plant growing season, increase in the organic matter decomposition can promote CH4 production (Qin et al. 2010). Composition of microbial communities, including methanogenic archaea can be affected by the plant growth (Watanabe et al. 2010). Increase in plant is associated with increase in DOC (Lu et al. 2000a, b), and root-derived DOC is a major C source for methanogenic archaea (Wassmann and Aulakh 2000). Our data show that temperature was not related to methanogenic community structure, confirming what was reported in cold peatlands (Metje and Frenzel 2007).
In conclusion, our results revealed the prevalence of acetoclastic methanogen family Methanosarcinaceae and Methanosaeta, and showed a relationship between vegetation type (plant communities dominated by C. muliensis vs. E. valleculosa) and archaeal community composition, suggesting that plants (and/or environmental conditions controlling plant distribution) influence both archaeal community activity and dynamics, thus confirming results by Rooney-Varga et al. (2007). The height of the plant community was also related to archaeal community structure in Zoige wetland. Therefore, it may be possible to use vegetation type and plant height as predictors of methanogenic dynamics in wetland (Rooney-Varga et al. 2007).
References
Banik A, Sen M, Sen SP (1996) Effects of inorganic fertilizers and micronutrients on methane production from wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biol Fertil Soils 21:319–322
Bergman I, Klarqvist M, Nilsson M (2000) Seasonal variation in rates of methane production from peat of various botanical origins: effects of temperature and substrate quality. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33:181–189
Cadillo-Quiroz H, Bräuer S, Yashiro E, Sun C, Yavitt J, Zinder S (2006) Vertical profiles of methanogenesis and methanogens in two contrasting acidic peatlands in central New York State, USA. Environ Microbiol 8:1428–1440
Chen H, Yao SP, Wu N, Wang YF, Luo P, Tian JQ, Gao YH, Sun G (2008) Determinants influencing seasonal variations of methane emissions from alpine wetlands in Zoige Plateau and their implications. J Geophys Res 113:1–10
Chen H, Wu N, Gao Y, Wang Y, Luo P, Tian J (2009a) Spatial variations on methane emissions from Zoige alpine wetlands of Southwest China. Sci Total Environ 407:1097–1104
Chen H, Wu N, Yao S, Gao Y, Zhu D, Wang Y, Xiong W, Yuan X (2009b) High methane emissions from a littoral zone on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Atmos Environ 43:4995–5000
Chin K-J, Lukow T, Conrad R (1999) Effect of temperature on structure and function of the methanogenic archaeal community in an anoxic rice field soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2341–2349
Cole JR, Chai B, Farris RJ, Wang Q, Kulam SA, McGarrell DM, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2005) The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D294–D296
Conrad R (1999) Contribution of hydrogen to methane production and control of hydrogen concentrations in methanogenic soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28:193–202
Conrad R, Klose M, Noll M, Kemnitz D, Bodelier PLE (2008) Soil type links microbial colonization of rice roots to methane emission. Global Change Biol 14:657–669
Ding A, Willis CR, Sass RL, Fisher FM (1999) Methane emissions from rice fields: effect of plant height among several rice cultivars. Global Biogeochem Cycles 13:1045–1052
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Galand PE, Saarnio S, Fritze H, Yrjala K (2002) Depth related diversity of methanogen archaea in Finnish oligotrophic fen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42:441–449
Galand PE, Fritze H, Yrjälä K (2003) Microsite-dependent changes in methanogenic populations in a boreal oligotrophic fen. Environ Microbiol 5:1133–1143
Galand PE, Juottonen H, Fritze H, Yrjala K (2005) Methanogen communities in a drained bog: effect of ash fertilization. Microbial Ecol 49:209–217
Garcia J-L, Patel BKC, Ollivier B (2000) Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of methanogenic archaea. Anaerobe 6:205–226
Großkopf R, Janssen PH, Liesack W (1998) Diversity and structure of the methanogenic community in anoxic rice paddy soil microcosms as examined by cultivation and direct 16S rRNA gene sequence retrieval. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:960–969
Hales BA, Edwards C, Ritchie DA, Hall G, Pickup RW, Saunders JR (1996) Isolation and identification of methanogen-specific DNA from blanket bog feat by PCR amplification and sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:668–675
Hoj L, Rusten M, Haugen LE, Olsen RA, Torsvik VL (2006) Effects of water regime on archaeal community composition in Arctic soils. Environ Microbiol 8:984–996
Inagaki F, Nunoura T, Nakagawa S, Teske A, Lever M, Lauer A, Suzuki M, Takai K, Delwiche M, Colwell FS, Nealson KH, Horikoshi K, D’Hondt S, Jørgensen BB (2006) Biogeographical distribution and diversity of microbes in methane hydrate-bearing deep marine sediments on the Pacific Ocean margin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2815–2820
IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jiang N, Wang Y, Dong X (2010) Methanol as the primary methanogenic and acetogenic precursor in the cold Zoige wetland at Tibetan Plateau. Microbial Ecol 60:206–213
Jin HJ, Wu J, Cheng GD, Tomoko N, Sun GY (1999) Methane emissions from wetlands on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Chinese Sci Bulletin 44:2282–2286
Juottonen H, Galand PE, Tuittila ES, Laine J, Fritze H, Yrjala K (2005) Methanogen communities and Bacteria along an ecohydrological gradient in a northern raised bog complex. Environ Microbiol 7:1547–1557
Juottonen H, Tuittila ES, Juutinen S, Fritze H, Yrjala K (2008) Seasonality of rDNA- and rRNA-derived archaeal communities and methanogenic potential in a boreal mire. ISME J 2:1157–1168
Koch K, Knoblauch C, Wagner D (2009) Methanogenic community composition and anaerobic carbon turnover in submarine permafrost sediments of the Siberian Laptev Sea. Environ Microbiol 11:657–668
Kotiaho M, Fritze H, Merilä P, Juottonen H, Leppälä M, Laine J, Laiho R, Yrjälä K, Tuittila E-S (2010) Methanogen activity in relation to water table level in two boreal fens. Biol Fertil Soils 46:567–575
Kruger M, Frenzel P, Kemnitz D, Conrad R (2005) Activity, structure and dynamics of the methanogenic archaeal community in a flooded Italian rice field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:323–331
Lindau C, Bollich P, Delaune R, Patrick W, Law V (1991) Effect of urea fertilizer and environmental factors on CH4 emissions from a Louisiana, USA rice field. Plant Soil 136:195–203
Lipson DA, Schadt CW, Schmidt SK (2002) Changes in soil microbial community structure and function in an Alpine dry meadow following spring snow melt. Microbial Ecol 43:307–314
Lu YH, Conrad R (2005) In situ stable isotope probing of methanogenic archaea in the rice rhizosphere. Science 309:1088–1090
Lu Y, Wassmann R, Neue H-U, Huang C (2000a) Dissolved organic carbon and methane emissions from a rice paddy fertilized with ammonium and nitrate. J Environ Qual 29:1733–1740
Lu Y, Wassmann R, Neue H-U, Huang C (2000b) Dynamics of dissolved organic carbon and methane emissions in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:2011–2017
Lueders T, Friedrich MW (2003) Evaluation of PCR amplification bias by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of small-subunit rRNA and mcrA genes by using defined template mixtures of methanogenic pure cultures and soil DNA extracts. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:320–326
Metje M, Frenzel P (2007) Methanogenesis and methanogenic pathways in a peat from subarctic permafrost. Environ Microbiol 9:954–964
O’Halloran I (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
Peng J, Lu Z, Rui J, Lu Y (2008) Dynamics of the methanogenic archaeal community during plant residue decomposition in an anoxic rice field soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2894–2901
Qin Y, Liu S, Guo Y, Liu Q, Zou J (2010) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from organic and conventional rice cropping systems in Southeast China. Biol Fertil Soils 46:825–834
Rooney-Varga JN, Giewat MW, Duddleston KN, Chanton JP, Hines ME (2007) Links between archaeal community structure, vegetation type and methanogenic pathway in Alaskan peatlands. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60:240–251
Stahl DA, Amann RI (1991) Development and application of nucleic acid probes in bacterial systematics. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 205–248
Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680
Wagner D, Lipski A, Embacher A, Gattinger A (2005) Methane fluxes in permafrost habitats of the Lena Delta: effects of microbial community structure and organic matter quality. Environ Microbiol 7:1582–1592
Wassmann R, Aulakh MS (2000) The role of rice plants in regulating mechanisms of methane missions. Biol Fertil Soils 31:20–29
Watanabe T, Kimura M, Asakawa S (2006) Community structure of methanogenic archaea in paddy field soil under double cropping (rice–wheat). Soil Biol Biochem 38:1264–1274
Watanabe T, Kimura M, Asakawa S (2010) Diversity of methanogenic archaeal communities in Japanese paddy field ecosystem, estimated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Biol Fertil Soils 46:343–353
Yun J, Ma A, Li Y, Zhuang G, Wang Y, Zhang H (2010) Diversity of methanotrophs in Zoige wetland soils under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. J Environ Sci 22:1232–1238
Zhang G, Jiang N, Liu X, Dong X (2008a) Methanogenesis from methanol at low temperatures by a novel psychrophilic methanogen, “Methanolobus psychrophilus” sp. nov., prevalent in Zoige wetland of the Tibetan Plateau. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6114–6120
Zhang G, Tian J, Jiang N, Wang Y, Dong X (2008b) Methanogenic community in Zoige wetland of Tibetan plateau and phenotypic characterization of a dominant uncultured methanogen cluster ZC-I. Environ Microbiol 10:1850–1860
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Dr. X.-Z. Liu from the Institute of Microbiology, CAS for revising this paper. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30870447) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (kzcx2-yw-418-03). We thank Prof. Paolo Nannipieri for careful revision of this paper and two anonymous reviewers for their kind suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jianqing Tian and Huai Chen equally contributed to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 38 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, J., Chen, H., Dong, X. et al. Relationship between archaeal community structure and vegetation type in a fen on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Biol Fertil Soils 48, 349–356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0597-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0597-6