Abstract
Following the report of the Stiglitz Commission, measuring and comparing well-being across countries has gained renewed interest. Yet, analyses that go beyond income and incorporate non-market dimensions of welfare most often rely on the assumption of identical preferences to avoid the difficulties related to interpersonal comparisons. In this paper, we suggest an international comparison based on individual welfare rankings that fully retain preference heterogeneity. Focusing on the consumption-leisure trade-off, we estimate discrete choice labor supply models using harmonized microdata for 11 European countries and the US. We retrieve preference heterogeneity within and across countries and analyze several welfare criteria which take into account that differences in income are partly due to differences in tastes. The resulting welfare rankings clearly depend on the normative treatment of preference heterogeneity with alternative metrics. We show that these differences can indeed be explained by estimated preference heterogeneity across countries—rather than demographic composition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aaberge R, Colombino U (2011) Empirical optimal income taxation: a microeconometric application to Norway. CHILD Working Paper No. 16/2011
Aaberge R, Dagsvik J, Strøm S (1995) Labor supply responses and welfare effects of tax reforms. Scand J Econ 97(4): 635–659
Aaberge R, Colombino U, Strøm S (1999) Labor supply in Italy: an empirical analysis of joint household decisions, with taxes and quantity constraints. J Appl Econom 14(4): 403–422
Aaberge R, Colombino U, Strøm S (2000) Labor supply responses and welfare effects from replacing current tax rules by a flat tax: empirical evidence from Italy, Norway and Sweden. J Popul Econ 13(4): 595–621
Aaberge R, Colombino U, Strøm S (2004) Do more equal slices shrink the cake? An empirical investigation of tax-transfer reform proposals in Italy. J Popul Econ 17: 767–785
Alesina A, Glaeser E, Sacerdote B (2005) Work and leisure in the United States and Europe: why so different?. NBER Macroecon Ann 20: 1–64
Atkinson AB (2011) The restoration of welfare economics. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 101(3): 157–161
Bargain O, Caliendo M, Haan P, Orsini K (2010) Making work pay’ in a rationed labour market. J Popul Econ 21(1): 323–351
Bargain O, Decoster A, Dolls M, Neumann D, Peichl A, Siegloch S (2011) Welfare, labor supply and heterogeneous preferences: evidence for Europe and the US. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6102
Bargain O, Orsini K, Peichl A (2012) Comparing labor supply elasticities in Europe and the US: new results. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6735
Becker GS, Philipson TJ, Soares RR (2005) The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. Am Econ Rev 95: 277–291
Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1988) Money metric utility: a harmless normalization?. J Econ Theory 46: 120–129
Blackorby C, Laisney F, Schmachtenberg R (1993) Reference-price-independent welfare prescriptions. J Public Econ 50: 63–76
Blanchard O (2004) The economic future of Europe. J Econ Perspectives 18: 3–26
Blundell R, MaCurdy T (1999) Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1559–1695
Blundell R, Shephard A (2012) Employment, hours of work and the optimal taxation of low income families. Rev Econ Stud 79(2): 481–510
Blundell R, Duncan A, McCrae J, Meghir C (2000) The labour market impact of the working families’ tax credit. Fiscal Stud 21(1): 75–104
Brun BC, Tungodden B (2004) Non-welfaristic theories of justice: is “the intersection approach” a solution to the indexing impasse?. Soc Choice Welf 22: 49–60
Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1994) Unhappiness and unemployment. Econ J 104(424): 648–659
Creedy J, Hérault N (2012) Welfare-improving income tax reforms: a microsimulation analysis. Oxford Econ Pap 64(1): 128–150
Dagsvik J (1994) Discrete and continuous choice, max-stable processes, and independence from irrelevant attributes. Econometrica 62(5): 1179–1205
Dagsvik J, Strøm S (2006) Sectoral labor supply, choice restrictions and functional form. J Appl Econom 21(6): 803–826
Dagsvik J, Locatelli M, Strøm S (2009) Tax reform, sector-specific labor supply and welfare effects. Scand J Econ 111(2): 299–321
Decoster A, Haan P (2010) Empirical welfare analysis in random utility models of labour supply. KU Leuven, CES Discussion Paper Series 10.30
Eissa N, Hoynes HW (2004) Taxes and the labor market participation of married couples: the earned income tax credit. J Public Econ 88(9–10): 1931–1958
Eissa N, Kleven HJ, Kreiner C (2008) Evaluation of four tax reforms in the United States: labor supply and welfare effects for single mothers. J Public Econ 92: 795–816
Ericson P, Flood L (2009) A microsimulation approach to an optimal swedish income tax. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4379
Feenberg DR, Coutts E (1993) An introduction to the TAXSIM model. J Policy Anal Manag 12(1): 189–194
Fleurbaey M (2006) Social welfare, priority to the worst-off and the dimensions of individual well-being. In: Farina F, Savaglio E (eds) Inequality and economic integration. Routledge, London
Fleurbaey M (2007) Social choice and the indexing dilemma. Soc Choice Welf 29: 633–648
Fleurbaey M (2008) Fairness, responsibility and welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fleurbaey M (2009) Beyond GDP: the quest for a measure of social welfare. J Econ Lit 47: 1029–1075
Fleurbaey M (2011) Willingness-to-pay and the equivalence approach. Revue d’conomie politique 121(1): 35–58
Fleurbaey M, Gaulier G (2009) International comparisons of living standards by equivalent incomes. Scand J Econ 111: 597–624
Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2006) Fair income tax. Rev Econ Stud 73(1): 55–83
Fleurbaey M, Tadenuma K (2009) Universal social orderings. CCES Discussion Paper Series, No.9
Fleurbaey M, Trannoy A (2003) The impossibility of a paretian egalitarian. Soc Choice Welf 21: 243–263
Fuest C, Peichl A, Schaefer T (2008) Is a flat tax reform feasible in a grown-up democracy of Western Europe? A simulation study for Germany. Int Tax Public Financ 15(5): 620–636
Hodler R (2009) Redistribution and inequality in a heterogeneous society. Economica 76: 704–718
Immervoll H, Kleven H, Kreiner C, Saez E (2007) Welfare reform in European countries: a micro-simulation analysis. Econ J 117(516): 1–44
Jones CI, Klenow PJ (2010) Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. NBER Working Paper 16352
Kassenboehmer SC, Schmidt CM (2011) Beyond GDP and back: what is the value-added by additional components of welfare measurement? IZA Discussion Paper No. 5453
King M (1983) Welfare effects of tax reforms using household data. J Public Econ 21: 183–214
McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142
Ooghe E, Peichl A (2011) Fair and efficient taxation under partial control: theory and evidence. CESifo Working Paper No. 3518
Peichl A, Siegloch S (2012) Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models. Labour Econ 19(1): 129–138
Pencavel J (1977) Constant-utility index numbers of real wages. Am Econ Rev 67(2): 91–100
Prescott EC (2004) Why do Americans work so much more than Europeans?. Federal Reserv Bank Minneap Q Rev 28(1): 2–13
Preston I, Walker I (1999) Welfare measurement in labour supply models with nonlinear budget constraints. J Popul Econ 12(3): 343–361
Roberts K (1980) Price-independent welfare prescriptions. J Public Econ 13(3): 277–298
Slesnick DT (1991) Aggregate deadweight loss and money metric social welfare. Int Econ Rev 32: 132–146
Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi JP (2009) Report by the comission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Technical Report
Sutherland H (2007) Euromod: the tax-benefit microsimulation model for the European Union. In: Gupta A, Harding A (eds) Modelling our future: population ageing, health and aged care, international symposia in economic theory and econometrics, vol 16, Elsevier, pp 483–488
Van Soest A (1995) Structural models of family labor supply: a discrete choice approach. J Human Resour 30(1): 63–88
Van Soest A, Das M, Gong X (2002) A structural labour supply model with flexible preferences. J Econom 107: 345–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bargain, O., Decoster, A., Dolls, M. et al. Welfare, labor supply and heterogeneous preferences: evidence for Europe and the US. Soc Choice Welf 41, 789–817 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0707-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0707-x