Abstract
The success of the flat rate income tax in eastern Europe suggests that this concept could also be a model for countries of western Europe. The present paper uses a simulation model to analyze the effects of revenue neutral flat rate tax reforms on equity and efficiency for the case of Germany. We find that a flat rate tax with a low tax rate and a low basic allowance yields positive static welfare effects amounting to approximately 1.8% of income tax revenue but increases income inequality. The increase in income inequality can be avoided by combining a higher tax rate with a higher basic allowance. But in this case, the efficiency gains vanish. We conclude that due to their limited efficiency effects and their problematic distributional impact, flat tax reforms are unlikely to spill over to the grown-up democracies of western Europe.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adam, S., & Browne, J. (2006). Options for a UK flat tax: some simple simulations. IFS briefing note No. 72.
Altig, D., Auerbach, A., Kotlikoff, L., Smetters, K., & Walliser, J. (2001). Simulating fundamental tax reform in the U.S. American Economic Review, 91(3), 574–595.
Arntz, M., Clauss, M., Kraus, M., Schnabel, R., Spermann, A., & Wiemers, J. (2007). Arbeitsangebotseffekte und Verteilungswirkungen der Hartz-IV-Reform (IAB-Forschungsbericht No. 10).
Benedek, D., & Lelkes, O. (2007). Assessment of income distribution and a hypothetical flat tax reform in hungary. Paper presented at the IMA 2007 conference, Euro Centre, Vienna.
Blundell, R., & MaCurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1559–1695). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Browning, E., & Browning, J. (1985). Why not a true flat rate tax. Cato Journal, 5, 127–143.
Cajner, T., Grobovsek, J., & Kozamernik, D. (2006). Welfare and efficiency effects of alternative tax reforms in Slovenia. IB Revija (IB Review), XXXX(1–2), 125–136.
Caminada, K., & Goudswaard, K. (2001). Does a flat rate individual income tax reduce tax progressivity? A simulation for the Netherlands. Public Finance and Management, 1(4), 471–499.
Cogan, J. (1981). Fixed costs and labor supply. Econometrica, 49, 945–963.
Creedy, J., & Kalb, G. (2006). Labour supply and microsimulation: the evaluation of tax policy reforms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Davies, J. B., & Hoy, M. (2002). Flat rate taxes and inequality measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 33–46.
Decoster, A., & Orsini, K. (2007). Verdient een vlaktaks zichzelf terug? (Leuvense Economische Standpunten). K.U. Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
Dunbar, A., & Pogue, T. (1998). Estimating flat tax incidence and yield: a sensitivity analysis. National Tax Journal, 51, 303–324.
Fuest, C., Peichl, A., & Schaefer, T. (2007). Is a flat tax politically feasible in a grown-up Welfare State? (CPE discussion paper 07-6). University of Cologne.
Gaddy, C. G., & Gale, W. G. (2005). Demythologizing the Russian flat tax. Tax Notes International, 43, 983–988.
González-Torrabadella, M., & Pijoan-Mas, J. (2006). Flat tax reforms: a general equilibrium evaluation for Spain. Investigaciones Económicas, XXX(2), 317–351.
Gorodnichenko, Y., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Peter, K. S. (2007). Myth and reality of flat tax reform: micro estimates of tax evasion response and welfare effects in Russia (IZA discussion paper No. 3267).
Gupta, A., & Kapur, V. (2000). Microsimulation in Government Policy and Forecasting. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Haan, P. (2007). The effects of personal income taxation on labor supply, employment and welfare. Master’s thesis, FU Berlin.
Hall, R. E., & Rabushka, A. (1995). The flat tax (2nd ed.). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
Harding, A. (1996). Microsimulation and public policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hausman, J. (1985). Taxes and labor supply. In A. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (pp. 213–263). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Heer, B., & Trede, M. (2003). Efficiency and distribution effects of a revenue-neutral income tax reform. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25, 87–107.
Ho, M., & Stiroh, K. (1998). Revenue, progressivity and the flat tax. Contemporary Economic Policy, XVI, 85–97.
Immervoll, H., Kleven, H., Kreiner, C., & Saez, E. (2007). Welfare reform in European countries: a micro-simulation analysis. The Economic Journal, 117(516), 1–44.
Ivanova, A., Keen, M., & Klemm, A. (2005). Russia’s ‘flat tax’. Economic Policy, July, 397–444.
Jacobs, B., de Mooij, R. A., & Folmer, K. (2007). Analyzing a flat income tax in the Netherlands (Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 2007-029/3).
Keen, M., Kim, Y., & Varsano, R. (2007, forthcoming). The ‘flat tax(es)’: principles and experience. International Tax and Public Finance.
Kirchhof, P. (2003). Einkommensteuergesetzbuch—Ein Vorschlag Zur Reform der Einkommen- und Körperschaftsteuer. Heidelberg: Müller.
Kleven, H. J., & Kreiner, C. (2003). The marginal cost of public funds in OECD countries: hours of work versus labor force participation (CESifo working paper series no. 935).
Kuismanen, M. (2000). Labour supply and income tax changes: A simulation study for Finland (Bank of Finland discussion paper 5/2000).
MaCurdy, T., Green, D., & Paarsch, H. (1990). Assessing empirical approaches for analyzing taxes and labor supply. Journal of Human Resources, 25(3), 415–490.
McDonald, J., & Moffitt, R. (1980). The use of tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 318–321.
Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 175–208.
Mitchell, D. (2007). Flat world, flat taxes. http://www.american.com. Accessed 27 April 2007.
Mitschke, J. (2004). Erneuerung des deutschen Einkommensteuerrechts: Gesetzestextentwurf und Begründung. Köln: Otto Schmidt.
Nicodeme, G. (2007). Flat tax: Does one rate fit all? Intereconomics, 42(3), 138–142.
Paulus, A., & Peichl, A. (2007). Effects of flat tax reforms in Europe on inequality and poverty (Mimeo). University of Essex.
Peichl, A. (2005). Die Evaluation von Steuerreformen durch Simulationsmodelle (Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge Nr. 05-01).
Peichl, A., & Schaefer, T. (2006). Documentation FiFoSiM: integrated tax benefit microsimulation and CGE model (Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge Nr. 06–10). Universität zu Köln.
Schmidt, A. (2004). Statistische Messung der Einkommenspolarisation. Reihe: Quantitative Oekonomie, Band 141. Lohmar: Eul.
Slesnick, D. T. (1998). Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 2108–2165.
Tuomala, M. (1990). Optimal income tax and redistribution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Soest, A. (1995). Structural models of family labor supply: a discrete choice approach. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 63–88.
Van Soest, A., & Das, M. (2001). Family labor supply and proposed tax reforms in the Netherlands. De Economist, 149(2), 191–218.
Van Soest, A., Das, M., & Gong, X. (2002). A structural labour supply model with flexible preferences. Journal of Econometrics, 107, 345–374.
Ventura, G. (1999). Flat tax reform: a quantitative exploration. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23, 1425–1458.
Wagenhals, G. (2004). Tax-benefit microsimulation models for Germany: a survey. IAW-Report/Institut fuer Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (Tübingen), 32(1), 55–74.
Wissenschaftlicher Beirat beim Bundesministerium der Finanzen (2004). Flat Tax oder Duale Einkommensteuer? Zwei Entwürfe zur Reform der deutschen Einkommensbesteuerung. http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuest, C., Peichl, A. & Schaefer, T. Is a flat tax reform feasible in a grown-up democracy of Western Europe? A simulation study for Germany. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 620–636 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9071-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9071-2