Abstract
Objective
Several smaller single-center studies have reported a prognostic role for Ki-67 labeling index in prostate cancer. Our aim was to test whether Ki-67 is an independent prognostic marker of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in a large international cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods
Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining on prostatectomy specimens from 3,123 patients who underwent RP for prostate cancer was retrospectively performed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the association of Ki-67 status with BCR.
Results
Ki-67 positive status was observed in 762 (24.4 %) patients and was associated with lymph node involvement (LNI) (p = 0.039). Six hundred and twenty-one (19.9 %) patients experienced BCR. The estimated 3-year biochemical-free survivals were 85 % for patients with negative Ki-67 status and 82.1 % for patients with positive Ki-67 status (log-rank test, p = 0.014). In multivariable analysis that adjusted for the effects of age, preoperative PSA, RP Gleason sum, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, positive surgical margins, lymphovascular invasion, and LNI, Ki-67 was significantly associated with BCR (HR = 1.19; p = 0.019). Subgroup analysis revealed that Ki-67 is associated with BCR in patients without LNI (p = 0.004), those with RP Gleason sum 7 (p = 0.015), and those with negative surgical margins (p = 0.047).
Conclusion
We confirmed Ki-67 as an independent predictor of BCR after RP. Ki-67 could be particularly informative in patients with favorable pathologic characteristics to help in the clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy and optimized follow-up scheduling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with an effective and durable local disease control for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) [1]. Nevertheless, up to 30 % of patients experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) despite assumed effective local control [1]. Accurate evaluation of BCR risk status after initial treatment would guide physicians in the selection of high-risk patients who could benefit from adjuvant multimodal therapy and closer follow-up and spare those who would suffer from the side effects of such additional treatment without any benefit.
Molecular biomarkers may provide a better understanding of the biology of an individual’s tumor and may help stratify the heterogeneous patient population undergoing RP into risk categories that could help clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy and follow-up scheduling. Ki-67 is an established marker of cell proliferation that is present during the G1, S, G2, and M stages of the cell cycle [2]. Previous single-center smaller studies have shown the strong prognostic value of Ki-67 in patients with PCa [3]. Despite such studies that add to our knowledge, no marker is used for individual treatment recommendation in PCa. This is largely due to the lack of external validation in large multicenter studies as part of a phased biomarker research program [4, 5]. Therefore, we sought to validate the prognostic value of Ki-67 in patients treated with RP for clinically localized PCa.
Patients and methods
Patient selection and data collection
This was an institutional-review-board-approved study, with all participating sites providing institutional data sharing agreements prior to the initiation of the study. Prior to analysis, the database was closed and the final data set was produced. The study cohort included 3,294 patients from eight European and North American centers with PCa treated with RP between 2000 and 2011. Patients with preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >50 ng/ml (n = 15), missing preoperative PSA (n = 57), surgical margin status (n = 13), lymph node status (n = 54), and RP Gleason score (n = 32) were excluded from the analysis. A total of 3,123 patients were considered for analysis. None of the patients received preoperative radiotherapy, hormonal treatment, or chemotherapy. No patient had distant metastatic disease evidence found at the time of RP.
Pathological evaluation and immunochemistry
All surgical specimens were processed according to standard pathologic procedures as outlined elsewhere [6]. Genitourinary pathologists assigned pathologic stage, which was reassigned according to the 2007 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system when necessary. Lymphatic tissue removed during RP was submitted for histological examination. Positive pathological margin was defined as tumor cells in contact with the inked surface of the prostatectomy specimen.
Immunostaining was performed in a single laboratory on tissue slides. Immunostaining was performed on the Dako Autostainer (Carpinteria, CA) using mouse monoclonal antibody MIB-1 which is used in clinical applications to determine the Ki-67 labeling index (1:200 dilution; Dako). We used bright-field microscopy imaging coupled with advanced color detection software (Automated Cellular Imaging System, Clarient, Inc., CA). Ki-67 labeling index was considered to be high when samples demonstrated ≥20 % reactivity.
Follow-up
Follow-up (FU) was performed according to institutional protocols in agreement with local guidelines at the time. Generally, patients were seen postoperatively quarterly for the first year, semiannually in the second year, and annually thereafter. Digital rectal examination and PSA evaluation were performed at each visit. The primary endpoint BCR was defined as PSA value >0.2 ng/ml on two consecutive visits. The date of BCR was attributed to the day of the first PSA. In case of lymph node metastasis, immediate adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was initiated. No patient received immediate postoperative radiotherapy.
Statistical analysis
Associations of Ki-67 with categorical variables were assessed using Chi-square test. Differences in continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. BCR-free survival curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method; log-rank test was applied for pairwise comparison of survival. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models addressed the association of Ki-67 with BCR after RP. All p values were two-sided, and statistical significance was defined as a p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 statistical software (Chicago, IL).
Results
Descriptive characteristics
Baseline characteristics of the 3,123 patients are listed in Table 1. Ki-67-positive status was observed in 762 (24.4 %) patients. There was a significant association between Ki-67 status and lymph node involvement (LNI) (p = 0.039). None of the other clinicopathological characteristics was associated with Ki-67 status.
Association of Ki-67 with biochemical recurrence after RP
Median follow-up for patients who did not experience disease recurrence was 44 months (range 3–144). Six hundred and twenty-one (19.9 %) patients experienced BCR within a median follow-up of 21 months (range 1–135). The estimated 3-year biochemical-free survival was 85 % for patients with negative Ki-67 status and 82.1 % for patients with positive Ki-67 status (log-rank test, p = 0.014) (Fig. 1).
Tables 2 and 3 summarize the univariable and multivariable cox regression analyses. For the entire cohort, preoperative PSA, RP Gleason sum, LNI, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion were associated with BCR in univariable and multivariable analyses; Ki-67-positive status was also associated with BCR in both analyses (p = 0.015 and p = 0.019, respectively) (Table 2).
Multivariable analyses in subgroup of patients revealed a significant association of Ki-67-positive status and BCR only in patients without LNI (p = 0.004), without surgical margins positivity (p = 0.047), or with Gleason sum = 7 (p = 0.015).
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated the significance of Ki-67 status in the prediction of BCR in a large international cohort of patients treated with RP after adjusting for the effects of standard clinic-pathologic features. We confirmed previous studies that demonstrated the usefulness of Ki-67 in PCa [3, 7]. After RP, most studies demonstrated Ki-67 as an independent predictor of BCR [8–23]; however, conclusions from these studies were limited by their relatively small size and single-center nature (Table 4). Similarly, after radiation therapy, Ki-67 has been shown to have prognostic value with regards to disease progression, distant metastasis, and disease-related mortality [24].
We demonstrated that Ki-67 was associated with LNI but none of the other clinic-pathologic features. Such association has been already reported by Revelos et al. [15]. Interestingly, in multivariable analyses performed in subgroup of patients, Ki-67 was not significantly associated with BCR in patients with unfavorable pathologic features such as LNI, surgical positive margins, extracapsular extension or seminal invasion, or Gleason score sum >7. Ki-67 does not seem to add any statistical and/or clinical value in patients who have already pathologic features of biologically and clinically aggressive disease. In agreement with this, Gunia et al. reported a significant contribution of Ki-67 only in patients with favorable characteristics (PSA <20 ng/ml, Gleason score <7 (4 + 3), no seminal invasion, and/or no LNI) [21]. Similarly, Zellweger et al. [25] demonstrated that Ki-67 assessed in prostate needle biopsies was only associated with BCR in patients with low-risk disease. Accordingly, in the present study, Ki-67 was associated with BCR in patients with favorable pathologic criteria such as negative surgical margin and no LNI.
Relevance of a biomarker in patient decision guidance lies in its capacity to classify patients into risk groups with corresponding recommendations [26]. Adjuvant therapy after RP is generally discussed in patients with unfavorable pathologic features, while patients with no positive surgical margin and no LNI could erroneously consider cured. Even in this group with favorable pathologic results, some patients will experience disease recurrence [27–29]. To consider all patients for adjuvant therapy would be inappropriate and lead to overtreatment. Therefore, validated new prognostic biomarkers could be useful in the identification of an individuals’ risk of disease recurrence allowing informed decision-making regarding multimodal therapy and risk-adjusted follow-up scheduling. Our findings indicate that Ki-67 could be helpful to identify patients who should be considered candidates for early adjuvant treatment. However, adjuvant therapy after RP remains a controversial topic that needs further evaluations [1]. Likely, the benefit of these therapies would be in patients who are at increased risk based on molecular features reflecting the inherent biological potential of the cells rather than relying on pathologic features alone.
Incorporation of informative biomarkers in clinical practice has been disappointing to the present day [26]. Ki-67 is a marker of proliferation expressed during G1, S, G2, and M phases of cell cycle but not in G0 and early G1 phases [2]. Despite its easy quantification by immunostaining on paraffin-embedded tissues and relevant results in the published literature, the use of Ki-67 in clinical setting is still limited. Many reasons can preclude the clinical use of new tissue biomarkers in PCa [30]. The variability of cutoff values to define positive status, study and limited cohorts, and lack of prospective studies could explain why Ki-67 is not yet a widespread tissue biomarker in clinical practice [3]. Therefore, further large and multicenter studies with established protocols are needed to consider this promising biomarker in the decision-making process in PCa.
To the best of our knowledge, this study investigated the association of Ki-67 with BCR after RP in the largest international multi-institutional cohort so far. However, our study is limited by its retrospective nature. Another limitation is due to the use of immunohistochemical techniques. Therefore, we used established staining protocols and automated scoring systems based on bright-field microscopy imaging coupled with advanced color detection software to reduce the number of related variables.
Conclusion
Ki-67 positive status is an independent and significant prognostic marker of BCR after RP. Its significance is particularly relevant in patients with favorable pathologic criteria. Its use could be informative in the identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy and/or closer follow-up despite assumed local curative surgery.
References
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65(1):124–137
Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H (1984) Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133(4):1710–1715
Kristiansen G (2012) Diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers for prostate cancer. Histopathology 60(1):125–141
Shariat SF, Canto EI, Kattan MW, Slawin KM (2004) Beyond prostate-specific antigen: new serologic biomarkers for improved diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Rev Urol 6(2):58–72
Shariat SF, Karam JA, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI (2008) New blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer. BJU Int 101(6):675–683
Wheeler TM, Lebovitz RM (1994) Fresh tissue harvest for research from prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 25(5):274–279
Gallee MP, Visser-de Jong E, ten Kate FJ, Schroeder FH, Van der Kwast TH (1989) Monoclonal antibody Ki-67 defined growth fraction in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic cancer. J Urol 142(5):1342–1346
Bubendorf L, Sauter G, Moch H, Schmid HP, Gasser TC, Jordan P et al (1996) Ki67 labelling index: an independent predictor of progression in prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Pathol 178(4):437–441
Bettencourt MC, Bauer JJ, Sesterhenn IA, Mostofi FK, McLeod DG, Moul JW (1996) Ki-67 expression is a prognostic marker of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156(3):1064–1068
Cheng L, Pisansky TM, Sebo TJ, Leibovich BC, Ramnani DM, Weaver AL et al (1999) Cell proliferation in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: a marker for progression. Clin Cancer Res 5(10):2820–2823
Vis AN, Noordzij MA, Fitoz K, Wildhagen MF, Schroder FH, van der Kwast TH (2000) Prognostic value of cell cycle proteins p27(kip1) and MIB-1, and the cell adhesion protein CD44 s in surgically treated patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 164(6):2156–2161
Halvorsen OJ, Haukaas S, Hoisaeter PA, Akslen LA (2001) Maximum Ki-67 staining in prostate cancer provides independent prognostic information after radical prostatectomy. Anticancer Res 21(6A):4071–4076
Sebo TJ, Cheville JC, Riehle DL, Lohse CM, Pankratz VS, Myers RP et al (2002) Perineural invasion and MIB-1 positivity in addition to Gleason score are significant preoperative predictors of progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 26(4):431–439
Rubin MA, Dunn R, Strawderman M, Pienta KJ (2002) Tissue microarray sampling strategy for prostate cancer biomarker analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 26(3):312–319
Revelos K, Petraki C, Gregorakis A, Scorilas A, Papanastasiou P, Tenta R et al (2005) p27(kip1) and Ki-67 (MIB1) immunohistochemical expression in radical prostatectomy specimens of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. In Vivo 19(5):911–920
Inoue T, Segawa T, Shiraishi T, Yoshida T, Toda Y, Yamada T et al (2005) Androgen receptor, Ki67, and p53 expression in radical prostatectomy specimens predict treatment failure in Japanese population. Urology 66(2):332–337
Rubio J, Ramos D, Lopez-Guerrero JA, Iborra I, Collado A, Solsona E et al (2005) Immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 antigen, cox-2 and Bax/Bcl-2 in prostate cancer; prognostic value in biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 48(5):745–751
Shimizu Y, Segawa T, Inoue T, Shiraishi T, Yoshida T, Toda Y et al (2007) Increased Akt and phosphorylated Akt expression are associated with malignant biological features of prostate cancer in Japanese men. BJU Int 100(3):685–690
Laitinen S, Martikainen PM, Tolonen T, Isola J, Tammela TL, Visakorpi T (2008) EZH2, Ki-67 and MCM7 are prognostic markers in prostatectomy treated patients. Int J Cancer 122(3):595–602
Goto T, Nguyen BP, Nakano M, Ehara H, Yamamoto N, Deguchi T (2008) Utility of Bcl-2, P53, Ki-67, and caveolin-1 immunostaining in the prediction of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in a Japanese population. Urology 72(1):167–171
Gunia S, Albrecht K, Koch S, Herrmann T, Ecke T, Loy V et al (2008) Ki67 staining index and neuroendocrine differentiation aggravate adverse prognostic parameters in prostate cancer and are characterized by negligible inter-observer variability. World J Urol 26(3):243–250
Miyake H, Muramaki M, Kurahashi T, Takenaka A, Fujisawa M (2010) Expression of potential molecular markers in prostate cancer: correlation with clinicopathological outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 28(2):145–151
Antonarakis ES, Keizman D, Zhang Z, Gurel B, Lotan TL, Hicks JL et al (2012) An immunohistochemical signature comprising PTEN, MYC, and Ki67 predicts progression in prostate cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel after prostatectomy. Cancer 118(24):6063–6071
Kachroo N, Gnanapragasam VJ (2013) The role of treatment modality on the utility of predictive tissue biomarkers in clinical prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139(1):1–24
Zellweger T, Gunther S, Zlobec I, Savic S, Sauter G, Moch H et al (2009) Tumour growth fraction measured by immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 is an independent prognostic factor in preoperative prostate biopsies with small-volume or low-grade prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 124(9):2116–2123
Shariat SF (2014) Incorporating biomarker research in a real-world setting: challenges of a prophecy. Urol Oncol 32(3):219–221
D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Cote K, Loffredo M, Schultz D et al (2002) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer 95(2):281–286
Verze P, Scuzzarella S, Martina GR, Giummelli P, Cantoni F, Mirone V (2013) Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team’s experience on 1,600 consecutive cases. World J Urol 31(3):529–534
Bolton DM, Ta A, Bagnato M, Muller D, Lawrentschuk NL, Severi G et al (2014) Interval to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy does not affect survival in men with low-risk prostate cancer. World J Urol 32(2):431–435
Bensalah K, Montorsi F, Shariat SF (2007) Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling. Eur Urol 52(6):1601–1609
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
This study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mathieu, R., Shariat, S.F., Seitz, C. et al. Multi-institutional validation of the prognostic value of Ki-67 labeling index in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 33, 1165–1171 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1421-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1421-3