Abstract
Ground macrolichens dominated by several species of fruticose Usnea spp. with foliose Leptogium puberulum constitute an important component of the terrestrial ecosystem of James Ross Island. Long-term monitoring of lichen communities in respect to their reaction to ongoing climatic changes in this part of Antarctica became a research task for scientists in recent years. The non-destructive estimation of lichen biomass provides data necessary for the management and protection of Antarctica. We have developed and tested the methodology of non-destructive estimation of biomass of fruticose Usnea species, which predominate in the ice-free tertiary basalt outcrop areas on James Ross Island. In 38 experimental squares (non-destructive measurements), the density and height of lichen thalli were measured and digital photography with ground cover evaluation was performed. Lichen biomass was harvested from 14 experimental squares and analysed for dry mass, chlorophyll a, b content, and thalli surface area (TSA). Predictive linear models were constructed from available non-destructively measured variables with the aim to maximize predictive accuracy for the destructively measured attributes. A total of 82.3 % of variability in the TSA values was explained (87.5 % for biomass determination). Cross-validated prediction error for lichen TSA estimation was 423 cm2 (11.5 % of the average TSA). In the case of lichen dry mass determination, cross-validated prediction error was 4.53 g m−2 (7.3 % of the average dry mass). This study proves that macrolichens in maritime Antarctica can be monitored non-destructively by simple field methods combining digital photography and measurements of lichen thalli in botanical squares.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Fruticose Usnea species are some of the most widespread macrolichens in the maritime Antarctica (Kappen et al. 1991; Schroeter et al. 1995). They have a circumpolar distribution centred in the vicinity of the Antarctic Peninsula. This group of species (Usnea antarctica, Usnea subantarctica, Usnea sphacelata), together with the foliose Leptogium puberulum, show a wide ecological amplitude (Schroeter et al. 1995). They predominate in the patchy vegetation of the ice-free area on James Ross Island, mostly on the Tertiary basalt outcrop forming table mountains–mesas, reaching heights of 300–700 m.a.s.l. The most developed communities, growing mainly in the stable parts of sorted polygons (on rock surfaces or pebbles), are present on these mesas. On James Ross Island, the communities on basaltic mesas are very rich in biomass. Øvstedal and Lewis Smith (2001) stated that fruticose lichen taxa such as Usnea sp. generally predominate at higher altitudes and in more exposed habitats throughout maritime Antarctica. Already existing ice-free table mountains (mesas) and other formations within the James Ross Island Volcanic Group (JRIVG) (Smellie et al. 2009) on many islands in this geological formation have enabled the Usnea sp. community to become the most abundant lichen in this part of Antarctica. Thus, ecological research of this species is of high importance.
This lichen community can be viewed as a bioindicator in long-term ecological studies due to its reaction to recent temporal changes in maritime Antarctica (Benedict 1991; Kappen et al. 1995). The Antarctic Peninsula has experienced a rapid regional warming trend, much more pronounced than observed in other Antarctic areas (Rivera et al. 2005). Temperature data from the past 45 years show that a rise has occurred. In spite of large interannual variability, this trend is confirmed by ice shelf and glacial retreat (Doran et al. 2002). The northern part of the Antarctic Peninsula (including its associated islands) has a cold moist maritime climate. Changes in temperature and moisture can result, for example, in a different growth rate within one lichen species across Antarctica (Sancho et al. 2007).
Estimation of lichen biomass and diversity is a central part of many ecological investigations at high latitudes. Biomass of lichens or lichen thalli can be estimated either by destructive harvesting of randomly selected squares or non-destructively, usually by correlating biomass with some other measured attributes of the lichens.
The aim of this research work was to develop a special non-destructive method which can be used in the area of maritime Antarctica where Usnea species are very common. The method is based on measurements of density and height of lichen thalli as well as digital photography of the experimental plots for further evaluation to estimate Usnea sp. lichen biomass. In addition, our method should be tested also in different fruticose and/or foliose lichen communities and its validity compared with already existing non-destructive and destructive methods for estimating lichen biomass used mainly in the Arctic (Jonasson 1988; Luscier et al. 2006; Muukkonen et al. 2006; Moen et al. 2007). However, evaluation of differences in various lichen communities was not the aim of this paper.
Our intention was to determine whether the method can offer results as exact and satisfactory as other methods and therefore minimize the destructive impact on Antarctic lichen communities.
The field methods for Usnea community biomass estimations were developed with special respect to long-term ecological research focused on the observation of lichen community response to ongoing climate changes.
For the destructive method, we quantified biomass and diversity through the common harvesting and weighing technique. However, clipping and fractionating of the lichens took a long time, as it is a difficult task to be accomplished under Antarctic conditions. To reduce both the time of sampling and disturbance of lichen communities, we combined biomass and diversity estimation with more rapid but less informative measurements of density and height of lichens in experimental squares. At the same time, we conducted an image analysis of ground cover based on digital photographs of experimental plots. If these non-destructive methods provide satisfactory results, considerable time can be saved and lichen community damages can be reduced. Moreover, non-destructive estimations can be done repeatedly on the same surface within one experimental plot with only minor disturbance.
Thirty-eight experimental plots (plots 50 × 50 cm) were set up on three mesas (Berry Hill, Johnson Mesa and Lachman Crags) in the northern part of James Ross Island, NW part of the Weddell Sea, east of the north end of the Antarctic Peninsula (63°48′02″S, 57°52′57″W), where lichen standing crop and diversity were evaluated by both destructive and non-destructive methods.
Materials and methods
Study area
This study was undertaken in the vicinity of the Czech research station J. G. Mendel, James Ross Island (63°48′02″S, 57°52′57″W) during 2 summer months in 2007 and 2008. Three basaltic mesas (Berry Hill, Johnson Mesa and Lachman Crags) rich in Usnea species biomass (Figs. 1, 2) were selected for the study. Berry Hill and the northern part of Lachman Crags are almost completely covered with lichens, whereas in the southern part of Lachman Crags and Johnson Mesa only several spots (up to one-third of the mesa area) of Usnea species community occurred.
Density and height of Usnea thalli and ground cover (non-destructive measurements)
Thirty-eight experimental plots (plots 50 × 50 cm) were set up on the three mesas (Fig. 1), and the density and height of lichen thalli were measured. A measuring square, constructed of two Plexiglas squares 50 × 50 cm in size, was fixed to the corners by an iron pole; the squares were kept at a 5 cm distance from each other. Holes were drilled every 5 centimetres over the Plexiglas square. Before measurements were taken of each experimental plot, the Plexiglas square was carefully levelled using a builder’s level (approximate distance of the Plexiglas square from the ground was always from 20 to 40 cm), a calibrated measuring rod was inserted through the Plexiglas square holes applied to note the density and measure the height of lichen thalli (DHLT) (Usnea and Leptogium). This parameter includes the mean number and mean height of Usnea species thalli as well as the mean number of Leptogium, both per 0, 25 m2. Ground relief relative altitude values were measured by the same method. First, a digital photograph of the plot was taken (Nikon D70, AF-S NIKKOR lens with focal length 18–70 mm, placed 115–120 cm from the ground, plot shaded from the direct sun, camera fixed on a tripod) and ground cover (GC) evaluation was performed afterwards on a computer using Chips for Windows ver. 4.7 (Chips Development Team 1998). Each experimental plot photograph was analysed in order to separate lichens, stones and other material (matrix) into particular pixel groups (Fig. 3). Accordingly, only the pixel groups referring to Usnea species were further analysed for lichen GC. Leptogium occurred always in the deepest places in the ground relief and was not properly visible in the digital photographs. The ratio between 1 cm2 and a corresponding number of pixels was counted for each plot separately. Consequently, the exact lichen GC on each plot was determined.
Lichen biomass harvest and evaluation (destructive measurements)
Lichen biomass was harvested from 14 experimental plots (50 × 50 cm). The obtained biomass was analysed for dry mass (DM), chlorophyll a, b content (Chl a, Chl b—only Usnea species were analysed), and lichen thalli surface area (TSA). Only Usnea species were used for the thallus surface area estimation: thalli from each plot were scanned (HP ScanJet 3970). The same approach for GC (Chips for Windows ver. 4.7) was used for determination of lichen TSA (ratio between 1 cm2 and a corresponding number of pixels was counted for each scan separately and only “Usnea” pixels were counted for TSA determination). All relevant images from one experimental plot were pooled and summed.
After surface area measurements, lichens were analysed for chlorophyll a and b. All samples from each experimental plot were freeze dried (lyophilized) for 3 days in order to obtain DM, weighed, cut into small pieces with scissors and then extracted with DMSO following Hansson (1988). A particular fraction of the sample was inserted in a known amount of DMSO in test tubes and warmed up in 50 °C for 15 min (until the lichen was completely colourless). A subsample of 1.25 ml was then taken from each test tube and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm (Hettich universal 32R) to remove fine sediments. After the transfer of the supernatant, absorbency was measured by a spectrophotometer (Specort 205, double-beam, Analytik Jena, UK) at 649 and 665 nm in a 1–4 nm spectrophotometer resolution range. Concentration of chl a and b was calculated using equations by Lichtenthaler (1978) and Porra et al. (1989), respectively.
Statistical analyses
Predictive linear models were constructed from the available non-destructively measured variables in order to maximize predictive accuracy for the destructively measured attributes (Thallus surface area—TSA, DM). For each candidate predictor (density and height of lichen thalli—DHLT, GC), multiple parametric transformations were considered to maximize the linearity of its relation to a particular response variable: no transformation, log transformation, square transformation and square-root transformation. Final models were chosen from the set of candidate predictors (with pre-selected transformations) using the stepwise selection procedure based on the AIC value (Sakamoto et al. 1986). In order to estimate model reliability correctly, adjusted R 2 values were estimated, as well as the standard error of prediction, based on a jackknife method (Efron and Tibshirani 1993). Effects of individual predictors in selected linear models were visualized (Figs. 4, 5) with the effect plots, using the package “effects” (Fox 2003). All analyses were performed in R system version 2.8 (R Development Core Team 2008).
Results
Usnea species thalli surface area (TSA) estimation
The parameters used for construction of linear regression models are summarized in Table 1.
The final model was:
The individual parameters of the fitted model are summarized in Table 2. Adjusted R 2 of this model was 0.82 (F 5,8 = 13.1; p = 0.001).
The statistical models, in which digital photography (GC) together with lichen thalli measurements were used, gave the most accurate results for TSA estimation. A total of 82.3 % of the variability in the values was explained. The correlation between fitted and real TSA values was 0.944 and the prediction error was 237 cm2 on (50 × 50) cm. A more realistic cross-validated prediction error (based on a jackknife method) was 423 cm2 (approx. 11.5 % of the average TSA).
Thalli surface area (TSA) estimation determined only from the digital photographs of an experimental plot was much worse; only 22.7 % of the variability in surface values was explained (fall from 82.3 %), with cross-validated prediction error of 675.34 cm2 (18 % of the average TSA; F 1,12 = 4.819; p = 0.049).
Usnea species dry mass (DM) estimation
When predicting the Usnea species DM, the final model included the following predictors:
The fitted parameters of this model are summarized in Table 3. The adjusted R 2 of this model was 0.87 (F 4,9 = 23.7; p < 0.001).
The same statistical method was used for lichen biomass (DM) determination and again both digital photography GC and lichen thalli measurements had to be included in the calculation. In this case, 87.5 % of the variability was explained, with the correlation between the fitted and real values being 0.956. Prediction error was 1.05 g m−2 while the more realistic cross-validated prediction error was 4.53 g m−2 (approx. 7.3 % of the average DM).
When using a model only with the digital photography GC predictor, the cross-validated prediction error was 10.39 g m−2 (approx. 16.7 % of the average DMW), and adjusted R 2 was 0.20 (F 1,12 = 4.27; p = 0.061) (Table 4).
Discussion
When using the non-destructive methods of terrestrial plant standing crop estimation, biomass is usually predicted from the height and density of plant thalli, and/or with plant GC. GC or height of thalli is used more often to predict the biomass of low-growing species such as low shrubs or herbs. However, they can be applied to fruticose and, exceptionally, foliose lichens (Alaback 1986; Dunford et al. 2006; Moen et al. 2007). Estimates based on the height of the thallus are generally poor while those based on cover have to be treated with caution, because of the overlap of plant components (Jonasson 1988). There is no single variable that can be used with equally high predictive power among a broad spectrum of plant species or growth forms. For these reasons, we have developed and tested the methodology of non-destructive estimation of biomass of fruticose Usnea species, which predominate in the ice-free Tertiary basalt outcrop areas on James Ross Island, Antarctica. The reasons why we did not directly apply the method developed for estimating lichen biomass in the Arctic (Jonasson 1988; Luscier et al. 2006; Muukkonen et al. 2006; Moen et al. 2007) are: (1) fruticose lichens are morphologically diverse and (2) there is a lack of vascular plants on James Ross Island. Both of these reasons are highly specific to each type of lichen community. Without development and/or at least testing of the significance of non-destructive estimation methods of the lichen’s diversity, standing crop methods cannot be applied.
At present, with the ongoing changes of climate recorded in polar regions, the non-destructive estimation methods of ground lichen biomass can be used in ecosystem and carbon-cycle modelling (Smith 1990; Cornelissen et al. 2001; Callaghan et al. 2004a, b). The highest rise of temperature in the Southern hemisphere, 2.5 °C during the last 50 years, was recorded on the sub-Antarctic islands and the Antarctic Peninsula with neighbouring islands (Vaughan et al. 2003). James Ross Island in the maritime Antarctica is one of the localities where these climate changes have been demonstrated.
In our study, 82.3 % of the variability in the TSA values was explained and the correlation between fitted and real TSA values was 0.944 with an accuracy of TSA estimation (50 × 50) cm = ±237 cm2. In the case of biomass determination (DM), 87.5 % of the variability was explained and the correlation between fitted and real values was 0.956. The tests clearly show that Usnea TSA and its DM can be precisely estimated by non-destructive methods (density and height of thalli measurements and GC—digital photography evaluation in 50 × 50 cm experimental squares). Various photographic techniques have been successfully used for estimating cover in single-layer vegetation (Dietz and Steinlein 1996; Luscier et al. 2006), including lichen-rich vegetation (Gaare and Tömmervik 2000). However, evaluation of GC by digital photography has certain limitations. Leptogium occurred in the deepest places in the ground relief and was not properly visible in the digital photographs. Only Usnea species were considered in GC analyses. To the best of our knowledge, such an evaluation combination (GC and DHLT) has not been performed for the Usnea species and L. puberulum community in the Antarctic until now. However, non-destructive lichen biomass estimations were developed for the Arctic, because the ground lichens constitute a vital part of the reindeer diet. Non-destructive estimation of lichen biomass is therefore crucial in providing objective data for the management of lichen resources (Muukkonen et al. 2006).
The studied Usnea species and L. puberulum, which predominate on the Tertiary basalt outcrops on James Ross Island, differ in their photobiont composition. Whereas Usnea species (only Usnea species were analysed for chlorophyll content) contain a trebouxioid photobiont (green eukaryotic algae from the genus Trebouxia, order Pleurastrales) with chlorophyll a and b, L. puberulum is a typical cyanobiont with Nostoc containing chlorophyll a only (Øvstedal and Lewis Smith 2001). The content of chlorophyll in lichen thalli has been analysed by several authors (Lange et al. 1986; Demming-Adams et al. 1990; Schroeter et al. 1995; Kappen 2000). These studies have shown that the shaded parts of a lichen community contain a higher number of photobiont cells with a higher content of chlorophyll, while sunny parts have lower levels. This was the main reason why it was not possible to estimate Chl a concentration from the measured values in our statistical test. The content of chlorophyll is directly related to light conditions of a particular experimental site. Moreover, in our analyses, the Chl b concentration was dependent on the experimental plot micro-relief. L. puberulum frequently occurs in the deepest, and probably the most humid, parts of rock and/or pebble surfaces. This proves that the occurrence of the foliose cyanobiont (Nostoc) lichen L. puberulum is dependent on the experimental plot micro-relief. However, it can also be concluded that chlorophyll a and b contents cannot be used for non-destructive estimation of Usnea standing crop on the Tertiary basalt outcrops on James Ross Island. In this study, it has been shown that the macrolichen Usnea species community can be precisely monitored by non-destructive measurements (combination of estimation of density and height of lichen thalli and subsequent GC evaluation with the help of digital photography both in experimental squares). The combination of these simple field methods is proposed for long-term monitoring of lichen communities in respect to their reaction to ongoing climate changes that is occurring in this part of Antarctica.
References
Alaback PB (1986) Biomass regression equations for under-story plants in coastal Alaska: effect of species and sampling design on estimates. Northwest Sci 60:90–103
Benedict JB (1991) Experiments on lichen growth II. Effects of a seasonal snow cover. Arct Antarct Alp Res 23:189–199
Callaghan TV, Björn LO, Chernov Y, Chapin T, Christensen TR, Huntley B, Ims RA, Johansson M, Jolly D, Jonasson S, Matveyeva N, Panikov N, Oechel W, Shaver G, Elster J, Jónsdóttir IS, Laine K, Taulavuori K, Taulavuori E, Zöckler Ch (2004a) Responses to projected changes in climate and UV-B at the species level. Ambio 33:418–435
Callaghan TV, Björn LO, Chernov Y, Chapin T, Christensen TR, Huntley B, Ims RA, Johansson M, Jolly D, Jonasson S, Matveyeva N, Panikov N, Oechel W, Shaver G, Elster J, Henttonen H, Laine K, Taulavuori K, Taulavuori E, Zöckler Ch (2004b) Biodiversity, distribution and adaptations of Arctic species in the context of environmental change. Ambio 33:404–417
Chips Development Team (1998) Chips for Windows 4.7 (Copenhagen image processing system), general-purpose software package for remote sensing image processing and spatial data analysis. Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen. http://www.geogr.ku.dk/chips/
Cornelissen JH, Callaghan TV, Alatalo JM, Michelsen A, Graglia E, Hartley AE, Hik DS, Hobbie SE, Press MC, Robinson CH, Henry GHR, Shaver GR, Phoenix GK, Gwynn Jones D, Jonasson S, Chapin FS III, Molau U, Neill C, Lee JA, Melillo JM, Sveinbjörnsson B, Aerts R (2001) Global change and Arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increase in vascular plant biomass? J Ecol 89:984–994
Czech Geological Survey (2009) James Ross Island—northern part. Topographic map 1: 25,000. CGS, Prague
Demming-Adams B, Maguas C, Adams WWI, Meyer A, Kilian E, Lange OL (1990) Effect of light on the efficiency of photochemical energy conversion in a variety of lichen species with green and blue-green phycobionts. Planta 180:400–409
Dietz H, Steinlein T (1996) Determination of plant specific cover by means of image analysis. J Veg Sci 7:131–136
Doran PT, Priscu JC, Lyons WB, Walsh JE, Fountain AG, McKnight DM, Moorhead DL, Virginia RA, Wall DH, Clow GD, Fritsen CH, McKay CP, Parsons AN (2002) Antarctic climate cooling and terrestrial ecosystem response. Nature 415:517–520
Dunford JS, McLoughlin PD, Dalerum F, Boutin S et al (2006) Lichen abundance in the peatland of northern Alberta: implications for boreal caribou. Ecoscience 13:469–474
Efron B, Tibshirani J (1993) An introduction to bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York
Fox J (2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. J Stat Softw 8:1–27
Gaare E, Tömmervik H (2000) Overvåking av lavbeiter in Finnmark. NINA Oppdragsmelding 638:1–33
Hansson L (1988) Chlorophyll a determination of periphyton sediments: identification of problems and recommendation of methods. Freshw Biol 20:347–352
Jonasson S (1988) Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass. Oikos 52:101–106
Kappen L (2000) Some aspects of the great success of lichens in Antarctica. Antarct Sci 12:314–324
Kappen L, Breuer M, Bölter M (1991) Ecological and physiological investigations in continental Antarctic cryptogams. 3. Photosynthetic production of Usnea sphacelata: diurnal courses, models, and the effect of photoinhibition. Polar Biol 11:393–401
Kappen L, Sommerkorn M, Schroeter B (1995) Carbon acquisition and water relations of lichens in polar regions—potentials and limitations. Lichenologist 27:531–545
Lange OL, Kilian E, Ziegler H (1986) Water vapour uptake and photosynthesis of lichens: performance differences in species with green and blue-green algae as phycobionts. Oecologia 71:104–110
Lichtenthaler HK (1978) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic membranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382
Luscier JD, Thompson WL, Wilson JM, Gorham BE, Dragut LD (2006) Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots. Front Ecol Environ 4:408–413
Moen J, Danell Ö, Holt R (2007) Non-destructive estimation of lichen biomass. Rangifer 27:41–46
Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Laiho R, Minkkinen K, Vasander H, Finér L (2006) Relationship between biomass and percentage cover in understorey vegetation of boreal coniferous forest. Silva Fenn 40:231–245
Øvstedal DO, Lewis Smith RI (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia: a guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Porra RJ, Thomson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficient and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophyll a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. BBA Bioenergetics 975:384–394
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org
Rivera A, Casassa G, Thomas R, Rignot E, Zamora R, Antúnez D, Acuňa C, Orderes F (2005) Glacier wastage on Southern Adelaide Island, Antarctica, and its impact on snow runway operations. Ann Glaciol 41:57–62
Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G (1986) Akaike information criterion statistics. Reidel, Dordrecht
Sancho LG, Allan Green TG, Pintado A (2007) Slowest to fastest: extreme range in lichen growth rates supports their use as an indicator of climate change in Antarctica. Flora 202:667–673
Schroeter B, Olech M, Kappen L, Heitland W (1995) Ecophysiological investigations of Usnea antarctica in the maritime Antarctic I. Annual microclimatic conditions and potential primary production. Antarct Sci 7:251–260
Smellie JL, Haywood MA, Hillenbrand CD, Lunt DJ, Valdes PJ (2009) Nature of the Antarctic Peninsula ice sheet during the pliocene: geological evidence and modelling results compared. Earth Sci Rev 94:79–94
Smith RIL (1990) Signy Island as a paradigm of biological and environmental change in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 32–50
Vaughan DG, Marshall GJ, Connolley WM, Parkinson C, Mulvaney R, Hodgson DA, King JC, Pudsey CJ, Turner J (2003) Recent rapid regional climate warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Clim Chang 60:243–274
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Grant No. 206/05/0253) and the Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (Kontakt ME 945, ME 934, LM—2010009 CzechPolar). Petr Šmilauer work was supported by a Ministry of Education grant (MSM-6007665801). The authors thank Professor Dr P. Prošek, Director of the Czech Antarctic Research Programme, Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University (Brno) and Professor Dr J. Komárek, Botany Project Leader, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice as well as all members of the first and second Czech research expeditions to the J. G. Mendel Station for their support and friendship during our field work. We also appreciate help given by Professor Dr T. V. Callaghan, Abisko Scientific Research Station, who stimulated this research and gave us many pieces of advice and Dr. K. Edwards for language corrections.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bohuslavová, O., Šmilauer, P. & Elster, J. Usnea lichen community biomass estimation on volcanic mesas, James Ross Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 35, 1563–1572 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1197-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1197-0