Abstract
Tribulus terrestris is well known for its medicinal importance in curing urino-genital disorders. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), selective amplification of microsatellite polymorphic loci (SAMPL), inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers were used for the first time for the detection of genetic polymorphism in this medicinal herb from samples collected from various geographical regions of India. Six assays each of AFLP and SAMPL markers and 21 each of ISSR and RAPD markers were utilized. AFLP yielded 500 scorable amplified products, of which 82.9% were polymorphic. SAMPL primers amplified 488 bands, 462 being polymorphic (94.7%). The range of amplified bands was 66 [(TC)8G + M-CAG] to 98 [(CA)6AG + M-CAC] and the percentage polymorphism, 89.9 [from (CT)4C (AC)4A + M-CTG] to 100 [from (GACA)4 + M-CTA]. The ISSR primers amplified 239 bands of 0.4–2.5 kb, 73.6% showed polymorphism. The amplified products ranged from 5 to 16 and the percentage polymorphism 40–100. RAPD assays produced 276 bands, of which 163 were polymorphic (59%). Mantel test employed for detection of goodness of fit established cophenetic correlation values above 0.9 for all the four marker systems. The dendrograms and PCA plots derived from the binary data matrices of the four marker systems are highly concordant. High bootstrap values were obtained at major nodes of phenograms through WINBOOT software. The relative efficiency of the four molecular marker systems calculated on the basis of multiplex ratio, marker index and average heterozygosity revealed SAMPL to be the best. Distinct DNA fingerprinting profile, unique to every geographical region could be obtained with all the four molecular marker systems. Clustering can be a good indicator for clear separation of genotypes from different regions in well-defined groups that are supported by high bootstrap values.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
India being one of the 12 mega biodiversity centers of the world has tremendous natural wealth in the form of over 7,500 medicinal plant species. This accounts for 20% of its total flora, which is much higher than an average of 12.5%, reported of the world flora. The traditional plant based medicines have now become quite popular in both developing and developed countries. The ever-increasing demand of herbal drugs is causing loss of precious biodiversity and also creating shortage of raw material. Since, there have been few studies on genetic diversity on Indian medicinal plants (Singh et al. 2002; Negi et al. 2004; Bahulikar et al. 2004); for efficient conservation and management of genetic resources, it is imperative to analyze the genetic composition of species of different phytogeographical regions. For this purpose, we have selected Tribulus terrestris (Puncture-vine), a herb of Zygophyllaceae, endowed with various medicinal properties. For example, fruits are used in curing urinary discharges, cough, asthma, pain, spermatorrhoea, ophthalmia, anemia, dysentery, skin and heart diseases; leaves purify blood and are used as aphrodisiac; and roots are good stomachic and appetizer. Its purported effects include increased luteinizing hormone release and thus testosterone production, increased sperm production, increased ejaculatory volume and increased libido. The original use for T. terrestris extract was as a ‘tonic’ to treat sexual dysfunction. It is an important constituent of various medicinal preparations like Dashmularishta, Tribestan etc. world-wide. The herb is a C4 summer annual, distributed in the tropics as well as sub-tropics. In India it occurs in the tropics and warm temperate region, up to an altitude of 5,400 m. It possesses solitary yellow flowers and globose fruits with hard and sharp spines and is propagated through seeds. There are several native species in the genus Kallstroemia (K. parviflora and K. californica, family: Zygophyllaceae) that could be confused with T. terrestris, because of their similar morphology; especially when the plants have not begun to flower and fruits are not present. Such plants, often get accidentally mixed with T. terrestris while collecting raw material for herbal drug preparations, making them less efficient or some times toxic. This lack of authenticated raw material is a major problem facing the herbal pharmaceutical industry which have severe consequences, starting from decrease in drug efficacy to cardiac arrhythmias and poisoning. DNA fingerprinting techniques are very useful in correct identification of taxa, and thus preparation of authenticated and effective drugs. Another application of molecular markers is in carrying out genetic diversity studies. Multi-locus markers are more advantageous than single-locus markers, as they have a high mutiplex ratio. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) have been extensively used for the assessment of genetic diversity in a variety of plants like Saxifraga cernua (Kjølner et al. 2004), Zea mays (Garcia et al. 2004), Ziziphus spp. (Singh et al. 2006), Saccharum and Erianthus (Selvi et al. 2006), Panax quinquefolius (Lim et al. 2007) etc. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers are much more informative than RAPDs and have been used for the analysis of genetic diversity in Cicer sp. (Souframanien and Gopalakrishna 2004), Morus alba (Awasthi et al. 2004), Pisum sativum (Baranger et al. 2004), Asparagus acutifolius (Sica et al. 2005), Corchorus species (Roy et al. 2006) and others. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) has helped unravel genetic diversity in Azadirachta indica (Singh et al. 2002), Brassica nigra (Negi et al. 2004), Ranunculus acris (Odat et al. 2004), Nicotiana attenuate (Bahulikar et al. 2004), Brassica rapa (Zhao et al. 2005), Cicer sp. (Shan et al. 2005), Z. mays (Menkir et al. 2005), Cynodon (Wu et al. 2006), Glycine soja (Ru et al. 2006), Myricaria laxiflora (Liu et al. 2006) Gardenia jasminoides (Han et al. 2007), Chimonanthus spp. (Zhou et al. 2007) and others. Selective amplification of microsatellite polymorphic loci (SAMPL) though a modification of AFLP, detects more polymorphic loci. It is therefore more useful in cases with expected low level of diversity. Inspite of having manifold medicinal uses and world-wide distribution there has been no report on the extent of the genetic diversity prevalent in T. terrestris to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we have conducted this study to analyze genetic diversity present in this valuable medicinal plant from five different agro-climatic regions of India. We have used AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers for this purpose. The potential of these molecular markers was also compared.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Leaf samples from each of the single plant were collected from natural populations growing in Karnataka (six samples from Mysore), Uttaranchal (ten samples from Dehradun), Maharashtra (four samples from Amravati) and Rajasthan (four samples from Udaipur). Fifteen plants growing in the herbal garden at Hamdard University (Jamia Hamdard) represent the genotypes from Delhi.
DNA extraction
Genomic DNA was extracted from lyophilized leaf material following the modified protocol of Doyle and Doyle (1990) and stored at −20°C till further use. The DNA was quantified using agarose gel electrophoresis and employing serial dilutions of uncut λ-DNA as marker.
RAPD and ISSR analyses
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA assay was carried out in 15 μl reaction volume containing 50 ng DNA, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM each of dNTP, 10 μM random decamers, 0.6 U Taq polymerase (Invitrogen). Amplification was performed with thermal cycler (Eppendorf Germany) using the cycling parameters of Das et al. (1999). One cycle of 94°C for 2 min, 37°C for 2 min, 72°C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 37°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min. The last cycle was followed by 10 min extension at 72°C. The amplified products were resolved in 1.2% agarose gel (0.5 × TBE), stained with ethidium bromide (10 μg/ml) and photographed under UV light. For ISSR analysis, 20 ng of template DNA was subjected to amplification with 7.5 μM of 3′- anchored microsatellite primers, other components remaining same as that of RAPD. Electrophoresis was performed on 1.2% agarose gel. The annealing temperatures of the cycling parameter were re-adjusted for each microsatellite primers according to their calculated melting temperature (T m) based on the sequence composition [T m = 4°(G + C) + 2°(A + T) − 3°C].
AFLP and SAMPL analyses
Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis was performed as per the technical instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Life Technologies). Genomic DNA (300 ng) was restricted with EcoRI and MseI (2.5 U each) in a restriction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM Mg acetate, 250 mM K-acetate) in total volume of 25 μl. MseI and EcoRI adapters were subsequently ligated to digested DNA fragments. The adapter ligated DNA was preamplified using the following parameters: 20 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 60 s and 72°C for 60 s. The preamplified DNA was diluted 50 folds and used as a template for selective amplification reaction using EcoRI and MseI primers with three selective nucleotides at 3′-end. The EcoRI adapter specific primer was end labeled at 3′ using -P32-ATP using PNK enzyme. Selective amplification was carried out initially at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 68°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s; this was followed by a touch-down cycling protocol where the annealing temperature was reduced by 1°C in each cycle. This continued till the annealing reached 56°C. And finally 23 cycles of 94, 56 and 72°C for 30 s each. The reaction was stopped by addition of gel loading dye (98% formamide dye) and the samples were resolved on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and autoradiographed (Sambrook et al. 2001). For SAMPL analysis, the EcoRI primer was replaced by 3′ anchored microsatellite primers, all other conditions and parameters remaining the same. Products were resolved on 6% denaturing PAGE and autoradiographed.
Data analysis
The amplification products were scored for the presence (1) and absence (0) of bands across the genotypes to generate a binary matrix. Co-migrating bands were assumed to be originating from the same genetic locus.
The binary matrix was analyzed using the NTSYS-pc version 2.11w software to calculate the similarity values and generate the phenogram. Jaccard’s similarity coefficient was utilized for estimating the pairwise similarity between the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the formula GSij = a/a + b + c, where GSij represent the genetic similarity between the two individuals ‘i’ and ‘j’. ‘a’ is the number of polymorphic bands shared by ‘i’ and ‘j’, ‘b’ is the number of bands in ‘i’ and absent in ‘j’ and ‘c’ is the number of bands present in ‘j’ and absent in ‘i’ (Jaccard 1908). After obtaining the similarity matrix, clustering was performed by sequential agglomerative hiearchical nested clustering, a distance based method, where series of successive mergers are used to group individuals with similar characteristics. The graphical representation of the cluster (phenogram) was obtained by using the unweighted pair group method of mathematical averages (UPGMA). Mantel test (Mantel 1967) was used to test the correlation of coefficient between pairs of similarity matrices and for determining cophenetic correlation values using NTSYS-pc, version 2.11w.
The degree of confidence at the nodes of the phenogram was evaluated through WINBOOT software (Yap and Nelson 1995). The original binary matrix was bootstrapped between 100 and 1,000 replicates to generate variant matrices, which were then re-analyzed to generate phenograms with the bootstrap values at the nodes.
Polymorphic information content (PIC) or average heterozygosity was calculated as per the formula of Roldan-Ruiz et al. (2000): PIC = 2f i (1 − f i), where f i is the frequency of the amplified allele and 1 − f i is the frequency of null allele. Average heterozygosity (H av) is obtained by taking the average of PIC values obtained for all the markers and is calculated as:
Multiplex ratio (MR) for each assay was estimated by dividing the total number of bands (monomorphic—m, and polymorphic—p) amplified by the total number of assays (primer combinations employed—n) as per Powell et al. (1996).
Marker index (MI) was obtained by multiplying the average heterozygosity (H av) with MR (Powell et al. 1996).
Results
AFLP analysis
Six AFLP primer combinations produced 500 scorable products. Table 1 summarizes the number of bands amplified for different primer combinations and percentage polymorphism detected in T. terrestris. The average number of bands per primer combination was 83.3 and percentage polymorphism ranged from a low of 74.7 in primer combination E-AAG + M-CTA to a high of 97.2 in primer combination E-ACT + M-CAG. Figure 1a is a representative AFLP profile generated by primer combination E-ACT + M-CAG. This proved to be the most informative primer combination as it amplified maximum number of products (106) and detected highest polymorphism (97.2%). The monomorphic products are marked ‘M’ (Fig. 1a). The characteristic feature of this AFLP profile is the amplification product unique to the genotypes from Delhi (lanes 1–6, band marked as ‘D’). In addition, some of the genotypes from Mysore (lanes 17–19) lack an amplification product indicated as ‘H’. Additionally, the genotypes from Amravati has an amplification profile distinct from rest of the genotypes due to presence of unique bands (lane 23, bands marked ‘U’). Other rare polymorphic bands are ‘B-1’ in the accessions from Mysore and ‘C-1’ in Dehradun.
SAMPL analysis
An average of 81.3 bands were amplified per primer combination and the percent polymorphism ranged between 89.9 [(CT)4C(AC)4A + M-CTG] and 100 [(GACA)4 + MCTA]. Of 488 bands obtained with six primer combinations, 462 were polymorphic (94.7% polymorphism). Figure 1b shows a SAMPL fingerprint obtained with primer combination (CT)4C(AC)4A + M-CTG. Out of 89 amplified products, nine are monomorphic, three are marked ‘M’ in Fig. 1b. A-1, A-2 and A-3 are rare polymorphic bands as they are present in only some of the genotypes from Mysore, Rajasthan and Delhi, respectively. The result is listed in Table 2.
ISSR analysis
Twenty-one ISSR primers generated a total of 239 bands. Several polymorphic products specific to a particular geographic region could be observed. A representative fingerprint pattern generated by primer S-13 is shown in Fig. 1c. Out of 13 amplicons generated by this primer (size range 0.45–2.3 kb), five were monomorphic marked as ‘A’. A 0.8 kb amplicon ‘B’ is present only in genotypes from Mysore (lanes 1–4, Fig. 1c), and a 1.25 kb product is unique to genotypes from Delhi (‘C’, lanes 5–14). Several other bands were shared by genotypes from most geographical regions. Such bands, exemplified by ‘C*’, are shared by samples from Dehradun and Amravati, and ‘M*’ is shared by all genotypes except those from Mysore (0.8 kb; Fig. 1c). Another such product is indicated as ‘D’ which is also absent from genotypes originating from Mysore. The bright intensity of amplicon ‘D’ suggests its origin from a repetitive region such as a microsatellite locus. The results are summarized in Table 3.
As mentioned earlier, 21 ISSR primers generated 239 bands (size range 0.4–2.5 kb), an average of 11.4 amplifications per primer. The detected percent polymorphism was as low as 40 (primer UBC-2) to as high as 100 (UBC-4), an average of 73.6%.
RAPD analysis
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA assays were performed with a total of 21 random decamers. In total, 276 amplicons were scored in the size range of 0.4–3.0 kb. This gives an average of 13.1 bands per primer. Of the 276 bands, 163 proved to be polymorphic (59.0%) and hence informative (Table 4). G-12 proved to be the most efficient with 90% of the 20 products being polymorphic. In contrast, G-11 primer could detect only 8.3% polymorphism though it generated 12 amplified products. A representative RAPD profile obtained by primer A-1 is shown in Fig. 1d. Of a total of 12 bands (0.4–2.3 kb), 7 are polymorphic (58.33%). Two distinct categories are visible. The first marked ‘A’ are monomorphic, and the second category marked ‘B’, a 0.55 kb band, is unique to genotypes from Dehradun (lanes 17–22, Fig. 1d).
Statistical analysis
The presence (1) and absence (0) of bands were scored across all genotypes. The binary matrix generated was used to calculate a similarity matrix based on Jaccard’s coefficient. The phenograms based on genetic similarity data of AFLP and SAMPL are comparable. The major difference is in the clustering of genotypes of Amravati. AFLP presents them as sub-cluster of cluster II with similarity coefficients of 0.95–0.97 (Fig. 2a). In SAMPL analysis they cluster with similarity coefficients ranging from 0.64 to 0.8 (Fig. 2b). This reiterates that SAMPL markers detect more polymorphic loci. The phenograms based on ISSR and RAPD data indicate that genotypes from different geographical regions are clearly distinguishable as separate clusters (Fig. 2c, d).
All the phenograms confirm consistency of data. The principal correspondence analysis of the AFLP and SAMPL (data not shown) reveal genotypes from Mysore as being most diverse. They are not only different from other genotypes but also from each other, and hence, cannot be grouped together. In the case of ISSR and RAPD (data not shown), however, all the genotypes belonging to a particular geographic region were grouped together in PCA plots. This confirms the ability of AFLP and SAMPL markers to analyze more number of loci and thus differentiate closely related genotypes.
The four molecular marker systems were compared on the basis of four different criteria (Table 5). AFLP revealed highest MR (83.3) followed by SAMPL, RAPD and ISSR. In case of polymorphism detection, SAMPL as a tool scored higher than AFLP, ISSR and RAPD. The fact that microsatellites are hypervariable and when assayed revealed higher heterozygosity, as both SAMPL and ISSR score over AFLP and RAPD in terms of average heterozygosity (H av). Finally, ‘MI’, a measure of overall efficiency of a marker is highest for SAMPL, making it the most efficient marker for the genetic diversity studies in T. terrestris. Mantel test (Mantel 1967) was employed to determine the coefficient of correlation between the similarity matrices generated by these markers. The coefficient of correlation between AFLP and SAMPL was 0.793 (P = 0.01). Mantel test was also employed to analyze the ‘goodness of fit’ for the UPGMA dendrograms generated by each marker system (AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD). This was done by making the cophenetic similarity matrices from each UPGMA phenogram and then comparing these cophenetic similarity matrices with the original similarity matrices (generated from binary data) for each marker technique. It revealed values higher than 0.95 for all the markers used [RAPD (r = 0.998, P = 0.01), AFLP (r = 0.993, P = 0.01), ISSR (r = 0.973, P = 0.01), SAMPL (r = 0.957, P = 0.01)], thus confirming their authenticity. Bootstrap analysis of this data was performed to determine the confidence values as percentages at each node. Very high bootstrap values were obtained from the major nodes. Hundred percent support value was obtained for the node at which cluster II separates from cluster III in the phenogram obtained from AFLP data. The support value for the Delhi cluster was also 100% (Fig. 2a). The bootstrap values for the RAPD phenogram are also 100% for each cluster (Mysore, Delhi and Dehradun) as evident from Fig. 2d.
Discussion
Geographically isolated populations of plant species tend to accumulate genetic variations during the course of environmental adaptations. The medicinal herb, T. terrestris chosen for the current study is an annual with propagation through seeds. However, the predominant mode of genetic material exchange, whether through selfing or out crossing needs to be unambiguously established. All four molecular markers, that rely on arbitrary and semi-arbitrary nature of amplification detected polymorphism percentage ranging between 60 and 95%. AFLP revealed an average of 82.9% polymorphism across all genotypes. Such high percentage polymorphism (79.5) is also reported in ten populations of two different habitat types of R. acris (Odat et al. 2004). In our studies the low region-wise diversity is in congruence with the study of Fu et al. (2004) on little blue stem (Schizachyrium scoparium), where AFLP revealed high (>91%) interpropulation and low (only 7.9%) intrapopulation genetic diversity. Natural populations propagating through seeds implicitly have higher level of variation. AFLP analysis of six natural populations of Rubus arcticus detected high level of interpopulation genetic variation (0.72–0.94) measured as Simpson index (D). In T. terrestris AFLP grouped Delhi genotypes into one tight cluster. Likewise, genotypes from Dehradun and Amravati formed distinct groups. But, genotypes from Jaipur appear diverse and showed relatedness to genotypes from Delhi, Dehradun and Amravati. Several reasons could be attributed to the low intra-zonal diversity detected in the present investigation. First, the genotypes have genetically adapted to local environment and have become homogenous as a result of ‘inbreeding’ or exchange of genetic material within the said population. Thus, in the present investigations, unique DNA amplification profile brought out a distinct genetic identity belonging to genotypes of separate geographical regions. However, such a specific genetic separateness has not created a hybridization barrier across zones, and therefore provides an opportunity to genotypes from different zones to exchange genetic material. The spines and warty protuberances on T. terrestris fruits enable them to easily attach to animals and humans and to stick onto vehicle tires (cars, farm, airplane), subsequently facilitating long distance dispersion and spread and thus exchange of genetic material between distant populations. Our results are comparable to white clover (Trifolium repens) where RAPD indicated closeness between population of Atlantic Canada to population from Georgia and those from West Virginia to the cultivar Sacramento (Gustine et al. 2002). Similarly, RAPD analysis of Iris setosa showed genotypes from one location sharing higher level of genetic relatedness with other geographic location (Artyukova et al. 2001). This corroborates the fact that geographically and genetically distinct populations can exchange genetic information and that these are not completely isolated. In the present study similar results were obtained with SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers as they unraveled higher level of interzonal but a much lower level of intra population genetic diversity. In the present investigation, various high intensity bands were amplified, like a 1.8 kb ISSR band amplified by primer S-13. Artyukova et al. (2001) have also reported RAPD bands of such high intensity in Iris. The high intensity bands could be a consequence of high copy number. The region-specific bands detected in our studies can be used for the authentication of this medicinal herb as the biochemical properties of the pharmaceutically active ingredients is known to be influenced by the geographic region. Wang et al. (2003) have already exploited RAPD for confirming the genuineness of Bupleurum chinense. Na et al. (2004) have detected three RAPD primers which can discriminate between Korean and Chinese Astragali radix. The comparison of the four molecular marker systems revealed SAMPL to be the best as it generated highest percentage polymorphism and high MI. The capability of SAMPL markers lies in the detection of hypervariability in the microsatellite region. Microsatellites detect high level of polymorphism (Teulat et al. 2000), which can be used to discriminate between closely related genotypes. The hypervariability of SSR is due to variable copy number of repeat units at a locus (Tautz and Renz 1984). The measure of overall efficiency of a marker system remains the ‘MI’ which is highest for SAMPL as also reported by Tosti and Negri (2002). Phenograms generated from AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD data showed similarity in relative placement of genotypes. SAMPL and AFLP markers provided a more detailed idea on the genetic relationship. The coefficient of correlation between SAMPL and AFLP markers is high (r = 0.793) in T. terrestris. Similar results have been obtained in A. indica by Singh et al. (2002), thereby implying that these marker techniques can be used judiciously and effectively for analyzing genetic diversity. The cophenetic correlation values of Mantel test are above 0.95 for each marker system. This validates the phenograms obtained after UPGMA analysis of binary matrices data. These findings can be used in authentication of the medicinally important herbs and perhaps in recognizing high yielding population in a particular area. Further advantages can be for planning conservation strategies, the population representing the maximum genetic diversity need to be conserved followed by the population which compliments the previous one.
References
Artyukova EV, Kozyrenko MM, Ilyushko MV, Zhuravlev YN, Reunova GD (2001) Genetic variability of Iris setosa. Russ J Mol Biol 35:134–138
Awasthi AK, Nagaraja GM, Naik GV, Sriramana-Kanginakudru, Thangavelu K, Javaregowda-Nagaraju (2004) Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genus Morus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays. BMC Genet. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/5/1
Bahulikar RA, Stanculescu D, Preston CA, Baldwin IT (2004) ISSR and AFLP analysis of the temporal and spatial population structure of the post-fire annual, Nicotiana attenuata, in SW Utah. BMC Ecol. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/12. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-4-12
Baranger A, Aubert G, Arnau G, Lainé AL, Deniot G, Potier J, Weinachter C, Lejeune-Hénaut I, Lallemand J, Burstin J (2004) Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using protein and PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 108:1309–1321
Das S, Rajagopal J, Bhatia S, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M (1999) Assessment of genetic variation within Brassica campestris cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism and random amplification of polymorphic DNA markers. J Biosci 24:433–440
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Fu YB, Phan AT, Coulman B, Richards KW (2004) Genetic diversity in natural populations and corresponding seed collections of little bluestem as revealed by AFLP markers. Crop Sci 44:2254–2260
Garcia AAF, Benchimol LL, Barbosa AMM, Geraldi IO, Souza CL Jr, Souza AP (2004) Comparison of RAPD, RFLP, AFLP and SSR markers for diversity studies in tropical maize inbred lines. Genet Mol Biol 27:579–588
Gustine DL, Voigt PW, Brummer EC, Papadopoulos YA (2002) Genetic variation of RAPD markers for North American white clover collections and cultivars. Crop Sci 42:343–347
Han J, Zhang W, Cao H, Chen S, Wang Y (2007) Genetic diversity and biogeography of the traditional Chinese medicine, Gardenia jasminoides, based on AFLP markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 35:138–145
Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 44:223–270
Kjølner S, Såstad SM, Taberlet P, Brochmann C (2004) Amplified fragment length polymorphism versus random amplified polymorphic DNA markers: clonal diversity in Saxifraga cernua. Mol Ecol 13:81–86
Lim W, Mudge KW, Weston LA (2007) Utilization of RAPD markers to assess genetic diversity of wild populations of North American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Planta Med 73:71–76
Liu Y, Wang Y, Huang H (2006) High interpopulation genetic differentiation and unidirectional linear migration patterns in Myricaria laxiflora (Tamaricaceae), an endemic riparian plant in the Three Gorges Valley of the Yangtze River. Am J Bot 93:206–215
Mantel NA (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
Menkir A, Kling JG, Badu-Apraku B, Ingelbrecht I (2005) Molecular marker-based genetic diversity assessment of Striga-resistant maize inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 110:1145–1153
Na HJ, Um JY, Kim SC, Koh KH, Hwang WJ, Lee KM, Kim CH, Kim HM (2004) Molecular discrimination of medicinal Astragali radix by RAPD analysis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 26:265–272
Negi MS, Sabharwal V, Bhat SR, Lakshmikumaran M (2004) Utility of AFLP markers for the assessment of genetic diversity within Brassica nigra germplasm. Plant Breed 123:13–16
Odat N, Jetschke G, Hellwig FH (2004) Genetic diversity of Ranunculus acris L. (Ranunculaceae) populations in relation to species diversity and habitat type in grassland communities. Mol Ecol 13:1251–1257
Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, Rafalski A (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) marker for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238
Rohlf FJ (2001) NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 5.1. Exeter Publishing Ltd, Setauket
Roldan-Ruiz I, Dendauw J, Van Bockstaele E, Depicker A, De Loose M (2000) AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in rye grasses (Lolium spp.). Mol Breed 6:125–134
Roy A, Bandyopadhyay A, Mahapatra AK, Ghosh SK, Singh NK, Bansal KC, Koundal KR, Mohapatra T (2006) Evaluation of genetic diversity in jute (Corchorus species) using STMS, ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Breed 125:292–297
Ru Z, Zhou C, Weifeng L, Baorong L (2006) Estimating genetic diversity and sampling strategy for a wild soybean (Glycine soja) population based on different molecular markers. Chin Sci Bull 51:1219–1227
Sambrook J, Maccallum P, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York, 2344 p
Selvi A, Nair NV, Noyer JL, Singh NK, Balasundaram N, Bansal KC, Koundal KR, Mohapatra T (2006) AFLP analysis of phenetic organization and genetic diversity in the sugarcane complex, Saccharum and Erianthus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:831–842
Shan F, Clarke HC, Plummer JA, Yan G, Siddique KHM (2005) Geographical patterns of genetic variation in the world collections of wild annual Cicer characterized by amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 110:381–391
Sica M, Gamba G, Stefania Montieri S, Gaudio L, Aceto S (2005) ISSR markers show differentiation among Italian populations of Asparagus acutifolius. BMC Genet. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/6/17
Singh A, Chaudhury A, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M (2002) Comparison of AFLP and SAMPL markers for assessment of intra-population genetic variation in Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Plant Sci 162:17–25
Singh AK, Sharma RK, Singh NK, Bansal KC, Koundal KR, Mohapatra T (2006) Genetic diversity in ber (Ziziphus spp.) as revealed by AFLP markers. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 81:205–210
Souframanien J, Gopalakrishna T (2004) A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 109:1687–1693
Tautz D, Renz M (1984) Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 12:4127–4138
Teulat B, Aldam C, Trehin R, Lepbrun P, Barker JHA, Arnold GM, Karp A, Baudouin L, Rognan F (2000) An analysis of genetic diversity in coconut (Cocos nucifera) populations from across the geographic range using sequence tagged microsatellites (SSRs) and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 100:764–771
Tosti N, Negri V (2002) Efficiency of three PCR-based markers in assessing genetic variation among cowpea (Vigna unguiculata ssp. unguiculata) landraces. Genome 45:268–275
Wang X, Li Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Yu Y (2003) RAPD analysis of genuineness on source of Bupleurum chinense. Zhong Yao Cai 26:855–856
Wu YQ, Taliaferro CM, Bai GH, Martin DL, Anderson JA, Anderson MP, Edwards RM (2006) Genetic analyses of Chinese Cynodon accessions by flow cytometry and AFLP markers. Crop Sci 46:917–926
Yap IV, Nelson R (1995) WinBoot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI discussion paper series no.14. IRRI, Los Baños
Zhao J, Wang X, Deng B, Lou P, Wu J, Sun R, Xu Z, Vromans J, Koornneef M, Bonnema G (2005) Genetic relationships within Brassica rapa as inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Theor Appl Genet 110:1301–1314
Zhou M-Q, Zhao K-G, Chen L-Q (2007) Genetic diversity of Calycanthaceae accessions estimated using AFLP markers. Sci Hortic (In press)
Acknowledgments
MS is grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for the award of Junior, and Senior Research Fellowship. The study was supported by a financial grant (number BT/PR 1969/PB/17/096/2000) from the DBT, Governtment of India to SD and PSS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. Puigdomenech.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarwat, M., Das, S. & Srivastava, P.S. Analysis of genetic diversity through AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers in Tribulus terrestris, a medicinal herb. Plant Cell Rep 27, 519–528 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0478-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0478-5