Abstract
Chlorpromazine (CPZ) is a small permeable cationic amphiphilic molecule that inserts into membrane bilayers and binds to anionic lipids such as poly-phosphoinositides (PIs). Since PIs play important roles in many cellular processes, including signaling and membrane trafficking pathways, it has been proposed that CPZ affects cellular growth functions by preventing the recruitment of proteins with specific PI-binding domains. In this study, we have investigated the biological effects of CPZ in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We screened a collection of approximately 4,800 gene knockout mutants, and found that mutants defective in membrane trafficking between the late-Golgi and endosomal compartments are highly sensitive to CPZ. Microscopy and transport analyses revealed that CPZ affects membrane structure of organelles, blocks membrane transport and activates the unfolded protein response (UPR). In addition, CPZ-treatment induces phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor (eIF2α), which reduces the general rate of protein synthesis and stimulates the production of Gcn4p, a major transcription factor that is activated in response to environmental stresses. Altogether, our results reveal that membrane stress within the cells rapidly activates an important gene expression program, which is followed by a general inhibition of protein synthesis. Remarkably, the increase of phosphorylated eIF2α and protein synthesis inhibition were also detected in CPZ-treated NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism of translational regulation that operates during a membrane stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Control of gene expression at the level of mRNA translation is the most immediate response to environmental or cellular stresses (Dever 1999). This regulation involves the phosphorylation of the α subunit of the translation initiation factor eIF2 (Dever et al. 1992). Phosphorylated eIF2α (eIF2α-P) causes a rapid decrease of global translation initiation by reducing the activity of the eIF2 complex. eIF2 is responsible for delivering charged methionyl initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAiMet) to the small (40S) ribosomal subunit in the first step of translation initiation. In mammalian cells, phosphorylation of eIF2α is mediated by four different protein kinases (PKR, HRI, GCN2 and PERK), which are activated in response to different cellular stresses such as a viral infection, heme deficiency in erythrocytes, nutrient starvation and accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER [reviewed in Holcik and Sonenberg (2005)]. Gcn2p, the only eIF2α kinase in yeast, is activated upon depletion of any amino acid by binding the corresponding uncharged tRNA at its regulatory C-terminal domain, which is related to the histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) (reviewed in Hinnebusch 2005). In addition to inhibiting translation initiation of almost all mRNAs, eIF2α-P activates the expression of Gcn4p by a unique translational control mechanism (reviewed in Hinnebusch 2005). Gcn4p is the major transcriptional activator of amino acid biosynthetic genes that is activated under amino acid starvation (Natarajan et al. 2001), a cellular response named general amino acid control (GAAC).
Gcn2p activity is also induced by other environmental stresses, which all elicit the increase of Gcn4p expression (Cherkasova and Hinnebusch 2003). These findings have led to the hypothesis that Gcn4p is capable of responding to different stresses, and therefore functions in more than one transcriptional gene expression program. Notably, Patil et al. (2004) showed that Gcn4p also regulates the expression of genes that are unrelated to the activation of GAAC genes but are part of the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR is triggered by the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER and leads to the activation of the ER-resident transmembrane kinase/endoribonuclease Ire1p (Cox et al. 1993). The activated Ire1p catalyzes a nonconventional splicing reaction that governs the production of the transcription factor Hac1p. Hac1p was shown to associate with Gcn4p to bind to upstream activation sequences found in the promoters of some UPR target genes (Patil et al. 2004), thus allowing a transcriptional response to ER stress.
Recently, Chang et al. (2004) showed that the UPR is also activated after a partial membrane transport defect anywhere along the secretory pathway. Notably, the activation of the UPR alleviates the impairment of protein transport and partially suppresses the growth defect of sec mutants. Additionally, Leber et al. (2004) reported that a block of the secretory pathway leads to a pronounced increase of HAC1 mRNA production, defining another mechanism of UPR control (termed S-UPR), which operates at the transcriptional level. These findings demonstrate that cells respond to a block of membrane transport to the cell surface by inducing a specific transcriptional program. In this context, we previously showed, using either sec mutants or chlorpromazine (CPZ), that eIF2α phosphorylation is strongly induced upon a membrane stress (Deloche et al. 2004). Thus, the expression of Hac1p and Gcn4p may be required to induce an appropriate cellular response that enables cells to cope with a membrane transport defect.
In this study, we investigated the toxic membrane effects of CPZ on actively growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. CPZ is an antipsychotic drug historically used in the treatment of schizophrenia that blocks the activity of various neurophysiological receptors such as dopamine and serotonin receptors (Capuano et al. 2002; Trichard et al. 1998). Although CPZ was shown to directly bind to some of these receptors, recent works indicate that the diverse effects of CPZ are mostly attributable to its interaction with anionic lipids (Chen et al. 2003; Jutila et al. 2001). Here, we report that CPZ profoundly perturbs membrane properties of internal organelles and leads to a rapid translational control of gene expression.
Materials and methods
Strains, reagents and growth conditions
Yeast strains used for the study are shown in Table 1, and their construction is described below. Strains were grown in standard rich medium (yeast extract-peptone-dextrose, YPD) or in synthetic complete medium complemented with 2% dextrose (SD) and the appropriate amino acids for plasmid maintenance (Guthrie and Fink 1991). NIH-3T3 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (GIBCO Life Science). Chlorpromazine, tunicamycin, 3-aminotriazole and thapsigargin were purchased from Sigma. Rapamycin was obtained from LC Laboratories. All these chemical products were prepared as recommended by the manufacturers.
The ODY304 (sec7::SEC7-EGFPx3::URA3) strain was constructed by pop-in-pop-out replacement with SEC7-EGFP as described in (Rossanese et al. 2001). Strains ODY326 and ODY327 were obtained by plasmid shuffling on 5-FOA plate using plasmids p[SUI2, LEU2; CEN] and p[sui2S51A, LEU2; CEN], respectively from the H1647 parental strain (25).
Chemical genomic screening analysis
The screen was performed using sublethal concentrations (10 and 20 μM) of CPZ in YPD medium buffered at pH 8.0 with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 9.4. The EUROSCARF yeast deletion library (4,855 clones) and the parental strains BY4741 and BY4742 were replicated (in duplicate) on YPD plates at pH 8.0 containing 0, 10 and 20 μM CPZ. Cells were then incubated at 30°C and growth phenotypes were recorded after 2 days. Mutants with a no (−) or slow (+/−) growth phenotype relative to untreated strains were identified using the Saccharomyces Genome Database and the MIPS Comprehensive Yeast Genome Database (CYGD) and listed in Table 2.
Electron microscopy
Early log-phase cells were grown in YPD (approximately 50 OD600 units), harvested, and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M Na cacodylate (pH 7.4), 5 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 2.5% sucrose for 1 h. Cells were then washed in 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 25 mM DTT, 5 mM EDTA, and 1.2 M sorbitol for 10 min, and resuspended in 100 mM K2HPO4 (pH 5.9), 100 mM citrate, and 1 M sorbitol. Following addition of oxylyticase (200 μg/ml) and Zymolyase T100 (600 μg/ml), cells were incubated for 40 min at 30°C. They were then spun down, washed, and resuspended in cold buffer containing 500 mM Na cacodylate (pH 6.8) and 25 mM CaCl2, followed by osmium-thiocarbohydrazide staining. Further processing details have been described previously (Rieder et al. 1996).
Whole cell extracts and western blotting
Yeast whole cell extracts were prepared from 2 OD600 units of cells by a mild alkaline treatment (Kushnirov 2000). NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, 1% deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4) supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Complete, Roche) for 30 min at 4°C. Lysates were then clarified in a tabletop centrifuge. For the analysis of eIF2α phosphorylation, equal amounts of protein from different extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to western blotting using monospecific antibodies for phosphorylated S51 in eIF2α (Biosource/44-718G) and polyclonal antibodies that recognize total eIF2α (generous gift from T. Dever).
Polysome analysis
Sucrose gradient analyses were performed according to de la Cruz et al. (1997).
Northern blotting
Total RNA was extracted from 100 OD600 units of exponentially growing cells and analyzed (5 μg) by northern blot as described (De Virgilio et al. 1993). DNA probes were labeled with [α−32P]CTP using the PRIME-IT II Random Primer Labeling Kit (Stratagene 300385).
35S pulse-chase assay and coimmunoprecipitation
Cell labeling was performed as described previously (Gaynor and Emr 1997). Briefly, mid-logarithmic phase (OD600 0.6) cultures were concentrated to two OD600 units/ml and labeled with 3 μl Redivue™ PRO-MIX™ Cell Labelling Mix (Amersham Biosciences/AGQ0080) for 10 min in SD medium containing 20 μg/ml BSA. Cells were chased with 10 mM methionine, 4 mM cysteine and 0.4% yeast extract for 20 min. To separate cells from media, cell suspensions were centrifuged at 14,000g for 2 min. To assay [35S] methionine/cysteine incorporation into proteins, whole cell extracts were prepared by a mild alkaline treatment (Kushnirov 2000). To determine secreted proteins, media fractions were precipitated by addition of TCA to a final concentration of 10%. After washing the pellets twice in cold acetone, proteins were solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer plus 5% β-mercaptoethanol. Labeling and immunoprecipitation of secreted pro-α-factor were performed as described (Seeger and Payne 1992). Labeled proteins and labeled immunoprecipitated pro-α-factor were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels and analyzed by fluorography.
To label NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, subconfluent dishes of cells in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS were pretreated with the indicated drugs for 10 min prior to a pulse labeling period of 40 min with 50 μCi of Redivue™ PRO-MIX™ Cell Labelling Mix. Cells were subsequently washed two times with ice-cold PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer. The lysate was clarified in a tabletop centrifuge and 6 μg of proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by fluorography.
Fluorescence and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy
For CPZ detection, cells were grown in YPD buffered at pH 8.0 with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 9.4 to mid-logarithmic phase at 30°C. For GFP images, ODY304 cells were grown in SD-URA buffered at pH 8.0 with 20 mM Tris–HCL pH 8.0 to mid-logarithmic phase at 30°C and treated or not with 100 μM CPZ for 30 min. Preparation of cells for immunofluorescence was essentially as described (Chuang and Schekman 1996). Cells were grown to 0.8 OD600 units/ml in SD medium at 30°C. Gln3p-myc13 was detected using mouse α-Myc (9B11, Cell Signaling) at a dilution of 1:2,000. Cy3 (indocarbocyamine)-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used at 1:2,000 dilution. Images (100× magnification) were obtained using a Zeiss microscope equipped with an Axiocam color digital camera and the AxioVision™ software. Figures were prepared with the use of the Adobe Photoshop 8.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) software program.
β-galactosidase assay
Cultures of cells containing the UPRE-LacZ plasmid (Zhou and Schekman 1999), a genomic integrated GCN4-LacZ, or HIS4-LacZ reporter were grown in synthetic complete medium to early-logarithmic phase before drugs were added for 2 h. UPR, Gcn4p and His4p expressions were measured by a standard β-galactosidase assay and the activity was normalized to the OD600 of cells (Miller Units) used for each assay. All results are an average of at least three independent determinations.
Results
CPZ prevents yeast cell growth and accumulates on internal membrane structures in a pH-dependent manner
CPZ is a permeable amphiphilic molecule that contains a hydrophobic tricyclic ring and a hydrophilic dimethylpropylamine side chain (Fig. 1a). The hydrophobic moiety allows CPZ to intercalate and diffuse within the hydrocarbon phase of membrane bilayers. At physiological pH, the tertiary dimethylpropylamine is protonated, creating a net positive charge and leading to the accumulation of CPZ in the cytosolic membrane leaflet by the formation of electrostatic interactions with anionic lipids such as phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylamine (PA) and phosphoinositides (PIs) (Fig. 1b) (Chen et al. 2003; Jutila et al. 2001; Sheetz and Singer 1974). To investigate the toxic membrane effects of CPZ on actively growing yeast cells, we spotted a wild-type culture grown to exponential phase on rich medium (YPD) plates containing increasing concentrations of CPZ, at different pH (Fig. 1c). We found that the minimal concentration of CPZ required to block growth is 30 μM at pH 8, and that lowering the pH results in increased resistance to CPZ. At pH 3, cell growth is no longer affected by 60 μM of CPZ. These data corroborate the previously observed pH-dependent effects of CPZ on erythrocyte membranes (Ahyayauch et al. 2003), and might be explained by the fact that positively charged CPZ is unable to enter the cells and diffuse within membranes. To test this possibility further, we took advantage of the fact that CPZ fluorescence intensity increases when interacting with anionic lipids (Chen et al. 2003), which allows it to be visualized within cells. As expected, no intracellular fluorescence was detected at acidic pH (Fig. 1d), confirming that protonated CPZ cannot cross the plasma membrane bilayer. At pH 8, CPZ diffuses within the cell and partitions into visible membrane structures, which are reminiscent of the ER and vacuole compartments (data not shown). Furthermore, the presence of bright spots of fluorescence in the interior of cells (Fig. 1d) suggests that CPZ is protonated in the cytosol, allowing its binding to anionic lipids present on the cytosolic face of subcellular compartments. We therefore propose that the insertion of CPZ into the cytosolic membrane bilayer of internal organelles alters essential cellular growth activity.
A genome-wide screen reveals that mutants displaying a transport defect between late-Golgi and endosomal compartments are CPZ-hypersensitive
To gain a better insight into the biological effects of CPZ on yeast membranes, we next performed a genome-wide screen for CPZ-hypersensitivity. In analogy to the principle of the synthetic lethal screen (Huffaker et al. 1987), CPZ-hypersensitive mutants are likely to define essential biological functions that also are targeted by CPZ. For this screen, a collection of yeast deletion strains (4,857 knockout mutants) was replicated on YPD plates at pH 8.0 containing either no drug or two different sub-lethal concentrations of CPZ and grown for two days at 30°C. The genes identified as essential for normal growth in the presence of CPZ are listed in different functional categories in the Table 2. Interestingly, the most CPZ-sensitive strains bear mutations that directly perturb membrane and protein trafficking between the late-Golgi and endosomal compartments. Among the genes identified, SAC1 encodes a phosphoinositol-4-phosphatase that regulates membrane and cytoskeleton function (Foti et al. 2001; Schorr et al. 2001). In this respect, it is noteworthy that CPZ increases the steady state level of PI4-P (phosphate at the D-4 position of the inositol ring) in human platelets and in mice fibroblasts (Frolich et al. 1992; Raucher and Sheetz 2001). PIs, but also PA and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), which serve as a lipid platform for the recruitment of coat proteins and promote membrane curvature to initiate the formation of vesicles (Bankaitis et al. 1990; Ktistakis et al. 1996; Rothman and Wieland 1996), are potential CPZ binding sites. Thus, it is likely that CPZ, by interacting with negatively charged lipids, interferes with membrane transport and produces a synergistic growth defect when combined with mutants that block membrane trafficking between the late-Golgi and endosomal compartments.
CPZ alters membrane structures of internal organelles and blocks the secretory pathways
To determine whether CPZ alters Golgi functions by interfering with the binding of proteins to Golgi membranes, we used a wild-type strain expressing a Sec7p-GFP fusion protein. Sec7p is an abundant peripheral membrane protein of the late Golgi, which is involved in vesicular membrane trafficking (Franzusoff et al. 1992). Under normal growth conditions, the Sec7p-GFP fluorescence was detected in bright spots representing Golgi elements (Fig. 2a). In the presence of 100 μM CPZ, the fluorescence was more diffused throughout the cells, revealing a lower capacity of Sec7p to bind to Golgi membranes, and as a consequence, to regulate membrane trafficking. Since defects of membrane transport through the late-Golgi and endosomal compartments often lead to a marked distortion of organelles of the secretory pathway, we next examined CPZ-treated cells by electron microscopy analysis. Ultrastructural analysis (Fig. 2b) revealed that cells treated with CPZ accumulate enlarged ER, Berkeley bodies [membrane structures that were initially observed in mutants defective in Golgi transport (Novick et al. 1980)], as well as membrane inclusions and other undefined aberrant membrane structures. Additionally, vacuoles were also larger and less electron dense, suggesting an effect of CPZ on vacuolar membrane permeability. Another striking morphology change was the formation of small blebs on the plasma membrane, which likely result from a decrease in plasma membrane–cytoskeleton adhesion (Raucher and Sheetz 2001). Finally, high concentrations of CPZ cause formation of micelles (data not shown), which were visualized by fluorescence (Fig. 1d). Collectively, these observations further support that an important deregulation of membrane transport occurs after CPZ treatment and prompted us to investigate the effect of CPZ on the secretory pathway. To do this, we took advantage of the fact that yeast cells efficiently secrete a few proteins into the growth medium (Robinson et al. 1988). Wild-type cells were incubated with or without CPZ for 10 min at 30°C, labeled with [35S]-methionine/cysteine for 10 min (pulse) and chased for 20 min. Cells and media were separated by centrifugation and proteins in the media were precipitated with TCA and resolved by SDS-PAGE. The incorporation of [35S]-methionine/cysteine into proteins was reduced in cells incubated with CPZ, indicating that CPZ causes a general inhibition of protein synthesis (Fig. 3a). Protein secretion was severely affected, with only one abundant protein (migrating in the molecular weight range of the secreted Hsp150p) detected in media of cultures treated with 100 μM CPZ (Fig. 3b) (Gaynor and Emr 1997; Russo et al. 1992). In addition, under the same growth condition, the newly synthesized precursor forms of the α-factor pheromone that are normally secreted from cells lacking the endoprotease Kex2p (Fuller et al. 1988; Julius et al. 1984) were not immunoprecipitated from media using α-factor precursor antiserum (Fig. 3c), which further confirms a secretory transport defect in cells treated with CPZ.
CPZ induces the UPR pathway and GCN4 mRNA translation
To alleviate a secretory stress, cells activate the UPR pathway that leads to the expression of specific genes, whose products promote stress adaptation thereby allowing cells to grow. We next tested whether the UPR is activated in CPZ-treated cells. Activation of the UPR was assayed by β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 4a) using an UPRE-lacZ reporter gene transformed in wild-type cells. As expected, cells treated with tunicamycin (Tm), which blocks N-protein glycosylation and elicits the UPR, exhibit elevated UPRE expression (5.8-fold increase). Treatment with 30 μM CPZ, a concentration that slightly affects protein synthesis (data not shown), results in a 2.7-fold increase of β-galactosidase activity, indicating that CPZ activates the UPR pathway at this concentration. At 100 μM CPZ, the UPR was slightly lower, a result that might be explained by the inhibitory effects of CPZ on protein synthesis and/or GCN4 transcription. We previously showed that a CPZ treatment causes a rapid phosphorylation of eIF2α (Deloche et al. 2004). In accord with this observation and with the role of eIF2α in the activation of GCN4, we showed that 30 μM CPZ leads to a 3.1-fold increase of the β-galactosidase activity in cells containing the GCN4-lacZ reporter (Fig. 4b). Importantly, as in rapamycin-treated cells, CPZ-induced GCN4 expression depends on eIF2α phosphorylation, since no increase of the β-galactosidase activity was observed in cells expressing the non-phosphorylated eIF2a S51A (in a sui2-S51A mutant). Additionally, it is worth noting that UPRE expression is also significantly reduced in the sui2-S51A mutant upon an ER stress (Fig. 4a), which corroborates the previous finding that Gcn4p expression plays a major role in the UPR activation (Patil et al. 2004). Altogether, these results demonstrate that cells upregulate a subset of stress genes in response to a mild CPZ treatment. The transcription of the HIS4 gene is known to be upregulated by Gcn4p under conditions of amino acid starvation (Drysdale et al. 1995). We thus determined whether Gcn4p induced by CPZ increases the β-galactosidase activity in cells containing the HIS4-lacZ reporter. As shown in Fig. 4c, the HIS4-lacZ is not derepressed under conditions where GCN4-lacZ activity is induced by CPZ. In contrast, the addition of 3-aminotriazole (3-AT; an inhibitor of histidine biosynthesis) increased HIS4-lacZ activity in an eIF2α phosphorylation-dependent manner. This finding strengthens previous results showing that the expression of Gcn4p is not only dedicated to the control of amino acid biosynthesis (Natarajan et al. 2001). Notably Gcn4p also regulates gene products involved in degradation of autophagosomes in a process known as autophagy (Klionsky and Emr 2000). In this context, a recent study (Steffensen and Pedersen 2006) reported that induction of heterologous membrane protein production derepresses Gcn4p without increasing transcription of HIS4. Under these conditions, Gcn4p may stimulate expression of genes whose products are involved in autophagy, thereby contributing to the degradation of excess of useless and/or toxic proteins. It is likely that CPZ causes mis-localization of a large number of membrane proteins by affecting membrane structures and vesicular trafficking. Thus, by analogy, the increase of Gcn4p following CPZ treatment may induce transcription of both autophagy and UPR genes (see also Discussion). This transcriptional response would serve to alleviate cellular stress by increasing the degradation rate of mis-localized membrane proteins and by restoring membrane transport along the biosynthetic pathways.
Inhibition of translation initiation occurs in a prototrophic strain and does not result from TORC1 inactivation
As observed by others (Cherkasova and Hinnebusch 2003), we detected an increase of eIF2α phosphorylation in cells treated with 10 μg/ml Tm. Our data however suggest that the UPR pathway does not mediate this increase, since we observed that UPR-deficient mutants (hac1Δ and ire1Δ; data not shown) show a similar eIF2α phosphorylation level as wild-type cells when treated with Tm. This finding suggests that eIF2α phosphorylation does not result from the ER stress, but possibly indirectly from a defective membrane transport event along the secretory pathway. One hypothesis would be that CPZ inhibits translation initiation by altering the subcellular localization and/or the activity of amino acid transporters, which could then lead to a rapid depletion of the intracellular amino acid pool. For instance, the volatile anesthetic isoflurane was previously shown to induce the phosphorylation of eIF2α by inhibiting the import of some amino acids in auxotrophic strains (Palmer et al. 2002). To address this possibility, we tested the effect of CPZ on eIF2α phosphorylation and translation initiation in the prototrophic strain D665-1A (Fig. 5a). As observed in SEY6210 (auxotroph), eIF2α was also phosphorylated in D665-1A after 30 min of 30 μM CPZ treatment (Fig. 5b). Accumulation of the 80S monosome and decrease of polysome content were also evident (Fig. 5c), corroborating a translation initiation defect. Higher concentrations of CPZ led to an even greater translation defect with a higher level of eIF2α-P. At 200 μM CPZ, protein synthesis was totally blocked as judged by the lack of actively translating ribosomes (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, a significant increase of the 40S/60S ratio was observed, indicating that either the synthesis or the stability of the 60S subunit is affected. These data are reminiscent of previous studies of the group of J. R. Warner, who showed a close relationship between the secretory pathway and ribosome biogenesis (Mizuta and Warner 1994) and a transcriptional repression of ribosomal protein genes upon a CPZ treatment at 250 μM (Nierras and Warner 1999).
TORC1 (Target Of Rapamycin Complex 1) controls the activity of Gcn2p in response to cellular nutrient availability (Cherkasova and Hinnebusch 2003) and associates with membrane endocytic elements (Chen and Kaiser 2003). This raised the possibility that CPZ might inactivate TOR activity by altering the localization and/or the lipid environment of TOR proteins. To address this possibility, we examined whether CPZ changes the expression of specific genes or the levels of glycogen, which are under the control of TORC1. Gln3p is the transcription activator of nitrogen catabolic genes, which is translocated into the nucleus under low nitrogen conditions or in response to TORC1 inhibition by rapamycin (Beck and Hall 1999). A wild type strain containing a genomically integrated myc-tagged GLN3 allele was treated with CPZ (100 μM) or rapamycin (1 μg/ml; ∼1 μM) for 30 min and 60 min (data not shown) and Gln3p localization was visualized by indirect immunofluorescence. As shown in Fig. 6a, Gln3p is found throughout the cytoplasm of CPZ-treated cells, while in control experiments, rapamycin caused a strong accumulation of Gln3p in the nucleus. We next measured the mRNA levels of HSP26 and GLN1, which are normally derepressed in rapamycin-treated cells (Fig. 6b). At 30 μM, a concentration of CPZ that inhibits ribosome biosynthesis (as judged by the decrease of the mRNA levels of RPS12 and the ribosome-associated heat shock protein SSB1), the expression of GLN1 and HSP26 genes remains still repressed. At a higher concentration of CPZ (100 μM), a slight induction of GLN1 after 30 min and HSP26 after 60 min was detected, suggesting that TORC1 might be partially inactivated under this condition. Finally, almost no glycogen accumulates in CPZ-treated cells as compared to cells treated with rapamycin (Fig. 6c). Taken together, our results indicate that, at least at concentrations of CPZ below 100 μM, inhibition of protein synthesis following CPZ treatment does not result from inhibition of an amino acid permease and/or TORC1 inactivation.
CPZ increases the phosphorylation of eIF2α and inhibits protein synthesis in NIH-3T3 cells
Previously, CPZ was shown to block clathrin-mediated endocytosis and the recycling of LDL receptor to the cell surface in human fibroblast cells (Wang et al. 1993). These data prompted us to determine whether a membrane transport defect induced by CPZ also results in a rapid inhibition of protein synthesis in mammalian cells. We used mice fibroblast NIH-3T3 cells that have previously been studied under conditions of CPZ treatment (Raucher and Sheetz 2001). As in yeast cells (Fig. 1a), CPZ traverses the plasma membrane and accumulates at the interior of the cell, potentially by interacting with internal membranes (Fig. 7a). To determine if CPZ inhibits protein synthesis, we then measured the incorporation of [35S]-methionine/cysteine in CPZ-treated NIH-3T3 cells (Fig. 7b). At 30 μM concentration, almost no radiolabeled proteins were detected, indicating that CPZ rapidly blocks mRNA translation. Notably, under this condition, the uptake of radiolabeled amino acids into cells was not affected (data not shown). Importantly, this inhibition was associated with an increase in eIF2α phosphorylation, similarly as in cells exposed to either thapsigargin, dithiothreitol or Tm; all agents that are known to induce an ER stress and to inhibit protein synthesis by activating the ER-localized eIF2α kinase PERK (Fig. 7b) (Harding et al. 2000). Altogether these results reveal that the relationship between membrane stress and translation initiation might be conserved from yeast to mammalian cells.
Discussion
CPZ perturbs internal membrane structures and protein transports
CPZ is a permeable amphiphilic molecule that partitions into the lipid cytoplasmic half of the membrane bilayer by interacting with the polar headgroups of phospholipids, resulting in the deformation of membrane structures. In the present study, we investigated the effects of CPZ on yeast membranes and demonstrate that CPZ diffuses within the cells and deforms membranes of intracellular organelles. Because negatively charged lipids such as PI, PA and PE localized on Golgi and endosmal compartments are known to induce membrane curvatures and recruit coat proteins to initiate the formation of vesicles, we argue that CPZ inhibits intracellular trafficking by modifying the structure and the net charges of membranes on secretory/endocytic compartments. Consistent with this idea, we showed that CPZ prevents the binding of Sec7p, an essential protein for secretion, onto late-Golgi membranes and rapidly blocks transport of some secreted proteins. Furthermore, our CPZ genetic screening analysis on the entire knockout gene mutant library revealed that the most CPZ-sensitive strains are those bearing mutations that alter membrane and protein trafficking between the late-Golgi and endosomal compartments.
CPZ-mediated stress leads to the expression of UPR genes and of Gcn4p, but does not inactivate TORC1 activity
Like most mutants experiencing a partial membrane transport defect (Chang et al. 2004), CPZ activates UPR gene expression. This transcriptional response is required for a rapid cellular adaptation in response to a membrane transport defect (Chang et al. 2004). The UPR integrates the Gcn4p-dependent cytosolic stress response (Patil et al. 2004). In this context, CPZ also induces GCN4 expression. Translational induction of GCN4 is part of the cellular response to changes in the environment such as depletion of amino acids (Natarajan et al. 2001). In CPZ-treated cells, the expression of Gcn4p depends on the Gcn2p-stimulated eIF2α phosphorylation. Since the only known way to activate Gcn2p is through binding of uncharged tRNA to its histidyl-tRNA-like domain, we first hypothesized that CPZ reduces the cytoplasmic levels of amino acids by decreasing the activity of amino acid transporters. Our data showed the phosphorylation of eIF2α still occurs in a prototrophic strain, indicating that CPZ does not block the import of amino acids. Nevertheless, we next reasoned that CPZ might reduce the activity of amino acid transporters localized on internal organelles such as the vacuoles (principal cellular amino acid storage). This might cause a decrease of the intracellular amino acid concentration, specially since the vacuolar membrane permeability appears to be affected by CPZ (Fig. 2b). However, none of the tested TORC1 readouts, which are normally induced under amino acid starvation, were significantly changed after CPZ treatments at concentration that induce Gcn4p expression. Furthermore, CPZ does not induce HIS4 transcription, which is normally activated by Gcn4p under conditions of amino acid starvation. These results indicate that CPZ-treated cells do not seem to respond to a particular nutrient limitation and that Gcn4p is likely required to deal with another stress situation.
We recently showed that a decrease of phosphatidyl inositol 4-phosphate (PI4-P) levels on Golgi and ER organelles in a pik1 (PI4-kinase) mutant result in a rapid phosphorylation of eIF2α (Cameroni et al. 2006). Like sac1Δ and drs2Δ mutants that deregulate the net charge of phospholipids on Golgi/endosomal compartments (see Table 1), the pik1 temperature sensitive mutant is highly sensitive to CPZ at permissive temperature (data not shown). Thus, it is possible that CPZ induces eIF2α phosphorylation by interfering with the function of charged lipids such as PI4-P. PI4-Ps are essential for protein transport from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane. However, because some sec mutants do not induce phosphorylation of eIF2α (e.g., sec4; Deloche et al. 2004), a block of protein transport to the cell surface does not seem to be directly linked to phosphorylation of eIF2α. Additionally, the activation of UPR does not induce eIF2α phoshorylation (data not shown) and GCN4 mRNA translation (Steffensen and Pedersen 2006), demonstrating that Gcn2p is not stimulated by an ER stress. How eIF2α phosphorylation is induced in CPZ-treated cells remains unclear. If CPZ does not perturb the intracellular level of amino acids nor inhibit TORC1, it is unlikely to impinge on Gcn2p activity. Alternatively, CPZ may, via its interaction with specific phospholipids on intracellular organelles, disturb the activity of an eIF2α-P-targeting phosphatase(s) (Fig. 8). Notably, the type I phosphatase Glc7p that regulates homotopic vacuole fusion, ER to Golgi and endocytic transports (Peters et al. 1999), and modulates the level of eIF2α phosphorylation (Wek et al. 1992) might be (indirectly) inhibited by CPZ, thereby leading to a rapid increase of eIF2α-P. Accordingly, Gcn4p derepression in CPZ-treated cells may be a physiological response that is necessary to modulate UPR gene expression in a coordinated manner with Hac1p (Fig. 8) to alleviate a membrane transport defect. However, in contrast to Patil et al. (2004), we found that activation of the UPR does not exclusively depend on the expression of Gcn4p since UPR activation following Tm or CPZ treatment was not abolished neither in the sui2-S51A mutant (Fig. 4a) nor in gcn2Δ and gcn4Δ strains (data not shown). One explanation for this discrepancy is that we used a higher concentration of Tm (10 vs. 1 μg/ml), which may perturb the secretory pathway. In this regard, a block of the secretory pathway was shown to boost HAC1 mRNA abundance (Leber et al. 2004) that, upon splicing, yields a higher production of Hac1p (S-UPR; see Introduction). It is therefore possible that an increased concentration of Hac1p, induced by a distal secretory stress from the ER, bypasses the requirement of Gcn4p to increase the UPR. Accordingly, Gcn4p may be mainly required in the early stage of the UPR, during a period where the cellular concentration of Hac1p is low (see also Fig. 4 in Patil et al. 2004). Alternatively, a secretion defect might induce additional regulatory factors that are capable of modulating the activity of Hac1p, thereby contributing to upregulation of UPR genes in the absence of Gcn4p.
CPZ rapidly inhibits protein synthesis by acting on multiple translation factors
The rapid increase of eIF2α phosphorylation in CPZ-treated cells argues that membrane stress is intimately connected to the control of translation initiation. At 100 μM, CPZ induces a much higher level of eIF2α phosporylation than at 30 μM, a concentration that was sufficient to totally derepress GCN4. The hyperphosphorylation of eIF2α was shown to cause a decrease in overall protein synthesis (Fig. 8), thereby allowing cells to preserve energy and cellular resources. We have shown previously that this inhibition of translation initiation is not completely abrogated in a mutant strain where eIF2α cannot be phosphorylated (eIF2α-S51A), implying the existence of additional mechanisms of translation inhibition (Deloche et al. 2004). Notably, we reported that the eIF4E-binding protein Eap1p functions as a translation initiation inhibitor in cells treated with CPZ and in mutants that block secretory or endocytic pathways (e.g., sec4 and end3). Interestingly, Eap1p was shown to interact genetically and biochemically with Scp160p (Mendelsohn et al. 2003), a ribosomal protein localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (Frey et al. 2001). It will be thus interesting to determine if Eap1p is essentially dedicated to the control of the expression of genes whose products are transported along the secretory pathway.
Finally, we cannot exclude that other translation factors such as eIF4B (i.e, Tif3p) also play a role in signaling the translation inhibition response after a membrane stress. eIF4B is an RNA-binding protein that stimulates eIF4A helicase activity to enhance the unwinding of inhibitory secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region of mRNAs. Interestingly, the eIF4B deletion strain was found to be highly sensitive to rapamycin, an observation that corroborates the finding that the mammalian eIF4B is an indirect target of mTOR, which is responsive to amino acid starvation (Raught et al. 2004). In this regard, we previously observed that the eIF4B mutant is synthetically lethal with mutants that affect Golgi function (e.g., vps54Δ, mon2Δ (Deloche et al. 2004)) and is partially sensitive to CPZ (Table 1), indicating that the function of eIF4B is required for cell growth during a membrane (Stevens et al. 1986) stress. Finally, at 200 μM CPZ, the level of ribosomal subunits dramatically dropped, resulting in a total arrest of protein synthesis (Fig. 8). This result confirms that CPZ, at concentrations that totally block the membrane and protein trafficking processes, represses ribosomal protein (RP) gene transcription (Nierras and Warner 1999), and substantiates the existence of an intimate coordination between ribosome biosynthesis and secretion (Mizuta and Warner 1994). Altogether our results suggest that distinct regulatory pathways inhibit protein synthesis, by targeting multiple translation factors in response to a severe membrane stress.
In this study, we also showed that CPZ strongly inhibits protein synthesis in mammalian cells. Remarkably, this inhibition is also coupled to a rapid phosphorylation of eIF2α. Thus, mammals appear to possess a similar adaptive response pathway, capable of integrating membrane stress to regulate translation initiation. We believe that the control of the phosphorylation of eIF2α may directly result from UPR activation. In contrast to yeast, higher eukaryotes possess a ER-resident transmembrane kinase, PERK, that phosphorylates eIF2α upon abnormal accumulation of unfolded proteins. Accordingly, CPZ might impair ER functions by altering membranes of secretory organelles, leading to a rapid inhibition of translation via the activation of PERK. This translation inhibition is likely independent of Gcn2p and might explain why protein synthesis is more efficiently inhibited by CPZ in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts than in yeast cells (data not shown).
In conclusion, we reported that CPZ, one of the most common drugs used for people with schizophrenia worldwide alters the integrity of most membrane organelles within a cell. Our results demonstrate that membrane stress induced by CPZ leads to a rapid translational control mechanism mainly mediated by the highly conserved eIF2α translation factor.
Abbreviations
- CPZ :
-
Chlorpromazine
- Tm :
-
Tunicamycin
- 3-AT :
-
3-Aminotriazole
- UPR :
-
Unfolded protein response
- ER :
-
Endoplasmic reticulum
- PI :
-
Phosphoinositide
- PS :
-
Phosphatidylserine
- PA :
-
Phosphatidylamine
- PE :
-
Phosphatidylethanolamine
References
Ahyayauch H, Goni FM, Bennouna M (2003) pH-dependent effects of chlorpromazine on liposomes and erythrocyte membranes. J Liposome Res 13:147–155
Bankaitis VA, Aitken JR, Cleves AE, Dowhan W (1990) An essential role for a phospholipid transfer protein in yeast Golgi function. Nature 347:561–562
Beck T, Hall MN (1999) The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors. Nature 402:689–692
Cameroni E, De Virgilio C, Deloche O (2006) Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate is required for translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 281:38139–38149
Capuano B, Crosby IT, Lloyd EJ (2002) Schizophrenia: genesis, receptorology and current therapeutics. Curr Med Chem 9:521–548
Chang HJ, Jesch SA, Gaspar ML, Henry SA (2004) Role of the unfolded protein response pathway in secretory stress and regulation of INO1 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168:1899–1913
Chen EJ, Kaiser CA (2003) LST8 negatively regulates amino acid biosynthesis as a component of the TOR pathway. J Cell Biol 161:333–347
Chen JY, Brunauer LS, Chu FC, Helsel CM, Gedde MM, Huestis WH (2003) Selective amphipathic nature of chlorpromazine binding to plasma membrane bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1616:95–105
Cherkasova VA, Hinnebusch AG (2003) Translational control by TOR and TAP42 through dephosphorylation of eIF2alpha kinase GCN2. Genes Dev 17:859–872
Chuang JS, Schekman RW (1996) Differential trafficking and timed localization of two chitin synthase proteins, Chs2p and Chs3p. J Cell Biol 135:597–610
Cox JS, Shamu CE, Walter P (1993) Transcriptional induction of genes encoding endoplasmic reticulum resident proteins requires a transmembrane protein kinase. Cell 73:1197–1206
de la Cruz J, Iost I, Kressler D, Linder P (1997) The p20 and Ded1 proteins have antagonistic roles in eIF4E-dependent translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5201–5206
De Virgilio C, Burckert N, Bell W, Jeno P, Boller T, Wiemken A (1993) Disruption of TPS2, the gene encoding the 100-kDa subunit of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase/phosphatase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, causes accumulation of trehalose-6-phosphate and loss of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase activity. Eur J Biochem 212:315–323
Deloche O, de la Cruz J, Kressler D, Doere M, Linder P (2004) A membrane transport defect leads to a rapid attenuation of translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 13:357–366
Dever TE (1999) Translation initiation: adept at adapting. Trends Biochem Sci 24:398–403
Dever TE, Feng L, Wek RC, Cigan AM, Donahue TF, Hinnebusch AG (1992) Phosphorylation of initiation factor 2 alpha by protein kinase GCN2 mediates gene-specific translational control of GCN4 in yeast. Cell 68:585–596
Drysdale CM, Duenas E, Jackson BM, Reusser U, Braus GH, Hinnebusch AG (1995) The transcriptional activator GCN4 contains multiple activation domains that are critically dependent on hydrophobic amino acids. Mol Cell Biol 15:1220–1233
Dubouloz F, Deloche O, Wanke V, Cameroni E, De Virgilio C (2005) The TOR and EGO protein complexes orchestrate microautophagy in yeast. Mol Cell 19:15–26
Efe JA, Plattner F, Hulo N, Kressler D, Emr SD, Deloche O (2005) Yeast Mon2p is a highly conserved protein that functions in the cytoplasm-to-vacuole transport pathway and is required for Golgi homeostasis. J Cell Sci 118:4751–4764
Foti M, Audhya A, Emr SD (2001) Sac1 lipid phosphatase and Stt4 phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase regulate a pool of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate that functions in the control of the actin cytoskeleton and vacuole morphology. Mol Biol Cell 12:2396–2411
Franzusoff A, Lauze E, Howell KE (1992) Immuno-isolation of Sec7p-coated transport vesicles from the yeast secretory pathway. Nature 355:173–175
Frey S, Pool M, Seedorf M (2001) Scp160p, an RNA-binding, polysome-associated protein, localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a microtubule-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 276:15905–159012
Frolich KW, Aarbakke GM, Holmsen H (1992) Chlorpromazine increases the turnover of metabolically active phosphoinositides and elevates the steady-state level of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate in human platelets. Biochem Pharmacol 44:2013–2020
Fuller RS, Sterne RE, Thorner J (1988) Enzymes required for yeast prohormone processing. Annu Rev Physiol 50:345–362
Gaynor EC, Emr SD (1997) COPI-independent anterograde transport: cargo-selective ER to Golgi protein transport in yeast COPI mutants. J Cell Biol 136:789–802
Guthrie C, Fink GR (1991) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. Methods Enzymol 194:3–21
Harding HP, Zhang Y, Bertolotti A, Zeng H, Ron D (2000) Perk is essential for translational regulation and cell survival during the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell 5:897–904
Hinnebusch AG (2005) Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:407–450
Holcik M, Sonenberg N (2005) Translational control in stress and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:318–327
Huffaker TC, Hoyt MA, Botstein D (1987) Genetic analysis of the yeast cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Genet 21:259–284
Julius D, Schekman R, Thorner J (1984) Glycosylation and processing of prepro-alpha-factor through the yeast secretory pathway. Cell 36:309–318
Jutila A, Soderlund T, Pakkanen AL, Huttunen M, Kinnunen PK (2001) Comparison of the effects of clozapine, chlorpromazine, and haloperidol on membrane lateral heterogeneity. Chem Phys Lipids 112:151–163
Klionsky DJ, Emr SD (2000) Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science 290:1717–1721
Ktistakis NT, Brown HA, Waters MG, Sternweis PC, Roth MG (1996) Evidence that phospholipase D mediates ADP ribosylation factor-dependent formation of Golgi coated vesicles. J Cell Biol 134:295–306
Kushnirov VV (2000) Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast 16:857–860
Leber JH, Bernales S, Walter P (2004) IRE1-independent gain control of the unfolded protein response. PLoS Biol 2:E235
Mendelsohn BA, Li AM, Vargas CA, Riehman K, Watson A, Fridovich-Keil JL (2003) Genetic and biochemical interactions between SCP160 and EAP1 in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 31:5838–5847
Mizuta K, Warner JR (1994) Continued functioning of the secretory pathway is essential for ribosome synthesis. Mol Cell Biol 14:2493–2502
Natarajan K, Meyer MR, Jackson BM, Slade D, Roberts C, Hinnebusch AG, Marton MJ (2001) Transcriptional profiling shows that Gcn4p is a master regulator of gene expression during amino acid starvation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21:4347–4368
Nierras CR, Warner JR (1999) Protein kinase C enables the regulatory circuit that connects membrane synthesis to ribosome synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 274:13235–13241
Novick P, Field C, Schekman R (1980) Identification of 23 complementation groups required for post-translational events in the yeast secretory pathway. Cell 21:205–215
Palmer LK, Wolfe D, Keeley JL, Keil RL (2002) Volatile anesthetics affect nutrient availability in yeast. Genetics 161:563–574
Patil CK, Li H, Walter P (2004) Gcn4p and novel upstream activating sequences regulate targets of the unfolded protein response. PLoS Biol 2:E246
Peters C, Andrews PD, Stark MJ, Cesaro-Tadic S, Glatz A, Podtelejnikov A, Mann M, Mayer A (1999) Control of the terminal step of intracellular membrane fusion by protein phosphatase 1. Science 285:1084–1087
Raucher D, Sheetz MP (2001) Phospholipase C activation by anesthetics decreases membrane–cytoskeleton adhesion. J Cell Sci 114:3759–3766
Raught B, Peiretti F, Gingras AC, Livingstone M, Shahbazian D, Mayeur GL, Polakiewicz RD, Sonenberg N, Hershey JW (2004) Phosphorylation of eucaryotic translation initiation factor 4B Ser422 is modulated by S6 kinases. Embo J 23:1761–1769
Rieder SE, Banta LM, Kohrer K, McCaffery JM, Emr SD (1996) Multilamellar endosome-like compartment accumulates in the yeast vps28 vacuolar protein sorting mutant. Mol Biol Cell 7:985–999
Robinson JS, Klionsky DJ, Banta LM, Emr SD (1988) Protein sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation of mutants defective in the delivery and processing of multiple vacuolar hydrolases. Mol Cell Biol 8:4936–4948
Rose MD, Winston F, Hieter P (1988) Laboratory course manual for method in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Habor Laboratory, New York
Rossanese OW, Reinke CA, Bevis BJ, Hammond AT, Sears IB, O’Connor J, Glick BS (2001) A role for actin, Cdc1p, and Myo2p in the inheritance of late Golgi elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 153:47–62
Rothman JE, Wieland FT (1996) Protein sorting by transport vesicles. Science 272:227–234
Russo P, Kalkkinen N, Sareneva H, Paakkola J, Makarow M (1992) A heat shock gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a secretory glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:3671–3675
Schorr M, Then A, Tahirovic S, Hug N, Mayinger P (2001) The phosphoinositide phosphatase Sac1p controls trafficking of the yeast Chs3p chitin synthase. Curr Biol 11:1421–1426
Seeger M, Payne GS (1992) Selective and immediate effects of clathrin heavy chain mutations on Golgi membrane protein retention in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 118:531–540
Sheetz MP, Singer SJ (1974) Biological membranes as bilayer couples. A molecular mechanism of drug–erythrocyte interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:4457–4461
Steffensen L, Pedersen PA (2006) Heterologous expression of membrane and soluble proteins derepresses GCN4 mRNA translation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5:248–261
Stevens TH, Rothman JH, Payne GS, Schekman R (1986) Gene dosage-dependent secretion of yeast vacuolar carboxypeptidase Y. J Cell Biol 102:1551–1557
Trichard C, Paillere-Martinot ML, Attar-Levy D, Recassens C, Monnet F, Martinot JL (1998) Binding of antipsychotic drugs to cortical 5-HT2A receptors: a PET study of chlorpromazine, clozapine, and amisulpride in schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatr 155:505–508
Wang LH, Rothberg KG, Anderson RG (1993) Mis-assembly of clathrin lattices on endosomes reveals a regulatory switch for coated pit formation. J Cell Biol 123:1107–1117
Wek RC, Cannon JF, Dever TE, Hinnebusch AG (1992) Truncated protein phosphatase GLC7 restores translational activation of GCN4 expression in yeast mutants defective for the eIF-2 alpha kinase GCN2. Mol Cell Biol 12:5700–5710
Zhou M, Schekman R (1999) The engagement of Sec61p in the ER dislocation process. Mol Cell 4:925–34
Acknowledgments
We are extremely grateful for continuous support from Costa Georgopoulos. We thank S. Emr, T. R. Graham, R. Schekman, A. Hinnebusch and T. Dever for providing strains, plasmids and antibodies. We also thank D. Ang for a critical reading of the manuscript and the PFMU at the Geneva Medical Faculty for access to electron microscope and ancillary equipments. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Canton of Geneva to C. Georgopoulos (FN-31-654039), M.F. (FN-3100A0-104489), PL (FN-3100A0-105894/1) and CDV (PP00A-106754/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Gerhard Braus.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Filippi, L., Fournier, M., Cameroni, E. et al. Membrane stress is coupled to a rapid translational control of gene expression in chlorpromazine-treated cells. Curr Genet 52, 171–185 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-007-0151-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-007-0151-0