Abstract
A direct application of classical portfolio selection theory is problematic for the small investor because of transaction costs in the form of bank and broker fees. In particular, minimum fees force the investor to choose a comparatively rather small selection of assets. The existence of transaction costs leads to an optimization problem that juxtaposes those costs against the risk costs that arise with portfolios consisting of only a few assets. Despite the non-convex and, thus, complex optimization, an algorithmic solution turns out to be very fast and precise. An empirical study shows that, for smaller investment volumes, transaction costs dominate risk costs so that optimal portfolios contain only a very small number of assets. Based upon these results, the cost-effectiveness of direct investments is compared to alternative vehicles, particularly index certificates and exchange-traded funds, depending on the level of invested wealth.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baule R, Entrop O, Wilkens M (2008) Credit risk and bank margins in structured financial products: evidence from the German secondary market for discount certificates. J Futures Mark 28: 376–397
Bertsimas D, Darnell C, Soucy R (1999) Portfolio construction through mixed-integer programming at Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo and Company. Interfaces 29: 49–66
Bienstock D (1996) Computational study of a family of mixed-integer quadratic programming problems. Math Program 74: 121–140
Blog B, van der Hoek G, Rinnooy Kan AHG, Timmer GT (1983) The optimal selection of small portfolios. Manage Sci 29: 792–798
Brennan MJ (1975) The optimal number of securities in a risky asset portfolio when there are fixed costs of transacting: theory and some empirical results. J Financ Quant Anal 10: 483–496
Chang TJ, Meade N, Beasley JE, Sharaiha YM (2000) Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Comput Oper Res 27: 1271–1302
Gilli M, Këllezi E (2002) Portfolio optimization with VaR and expected shortfall. In: Kontoghiorghes EJ, Rustem B, Siokos S (eds) Computational methods in decision-making, economics and finance. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 167–183
Gilli M, Këllezi E, Hysi H (2006) A data-driven optimization heuristic for downside risk minimization. J Risk 8(4): 1–18
Haugen RA (2001) Modern investment theory, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Jacob NL (1974) A limited-diversification portfolio selection model for the small investor. J Finance 29: 847–856
Jobst NJ, Horniman MD, Lucas C, Mitra G (2001) Computational aspects of alternative portfolio selection models in the presence of discrete asset choice constraints. Quant Finance 1: 489–501
Jorion P (1991) Bayesian and CAPM estimators of the means: implications for portfolio selection. J Bank Finance 15: 717–727
Levy H (1978) Equilibrium in an imperfect market: a constraint on the number of securities in the portfolio. Am Econ Rev 68: 643–658
Lobo MS, Fazel M, Boyd S (2007) Portfolio optimisation with linear and fixed transaction costs. Ann Oper Res 152: 341–365
Mansini R, Speranza MG (1999) Heuristic algorithms for the portfolio selection problem with minimum transaction lots. Eur J Oper Res 114: 219–233
Mao JCT (1970) Essentials of portfolio diversification strategy. J Finance 25: 1109–1121
Maringer D, Kellerer H (2003) Optimization of cardinality constrained portfolios with a hybrid local search algorithm. OR Spectr 25: 481–495
Maringer D (2005) Portfolio management with heuristic optimization. In: Advances in computational management science, vol 8. Springer, Berlin
Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7: 77–91
Patel NR, Subrahmanyam MG (1982) A simple algorithm for optimal portfolio selection with fixed transaction costs. Manage Sci 28: 303–314
Sankaran JK, Patil AA (1999) On the optimal selection of portfolios under limited diversification. J Bank Finance 23: 1655–1666
Sargent TJ (1987) Macroeconomic Theory, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
Sharpe WF (1963) A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Manage Sci 9: 277–293
Stoimenov PA, Wilkens S (2005) Are structured products ‘fairly’ priced? An analysis of the German market for equity-linked instruments. J Bank Finance 29: 2971–2993
Tobin J (1958) Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Rev Econ Studies 25: 65–86
Welch I (2000) Views of financial economists on the equity premium and on professional controversies. J Bus 73: 501–537
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author thanks Olaf Korn, Thorsten Poddig, Walter Zucchini, participants of the 18th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference (Sydney), and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Baule, R. Optimal portfolio selection for the small investor considering risk and transaction costs. OR Spectrum 32, 61–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0152-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0152-5