Introduction

Transition metal oxides have been considered as the promising active material candidates due to their unique and irreplaceable properties in optics (Liu and Aydil 2009), magnetism (Takada et al. 2001), catalysis (Cao et al. 2006) and electricity (Hu et al. 2008). The combination of active materials and ancillary materials to form functional systems had been highly expected to promote their functionalities and applications in many fields. Cobalt oxides have been widely used in glass industry for colored glasses and in chemical processes as a catalytic activator in oxidation reactions (Natile and Glisenti 2002; Hu et al. 2008; Casas-Cabanas et al. 2009; Jiao and Frei 2009; Artero et al. 2011; Liang et al. 2011; Yeo and Bell 2011). Also, there were some reports on the degradation of toxic gases like NOx using Co3O4 (Wöllenstein et al. 2003; Li et al. 2010).

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been used as support to assemble functional nanoparticles to produce novel nanocomposites, such as TiO2 (Liu and Aydil 2009; Woan et al. 2009). As for the same active phase, it was noteworthy that CNTs-based materials often showed higher activity than the samples deposited on other supports like alumina, silica, or even activated carbon (Endo et al. 2008; Zhai et al. 2010). Halloysite (Al2Si2O5(OH)4·2H2O) (Guimarães et al. 2010), a hydrated layered aluminosilicate of the kaolinite group, possesses hollow cylinders formed by multiply rolled layers containing octahedral gibbsite Al(OH)3 and tetrahedral SiO4 sheets (i.e., halloysite nanotubes, HNTs). Variable content of water molecules in the interlayer space of the halloysite structure affected the interplanar distance in the range from 0.7 nm (dehydrated form) to 1.0 nm (fully hydrated form). HNTs have been the subject of extensive researches, because they have, with respect to other minerals of kaolinite group, relatively higher specific surface area, porosity, as well as cation exchange capacity (Gualtieri 2001; Joussein et al. 2005; Hu and Yang 2012; Zhang and Yang 2012). Recently, HNTs presented exceptional physical properties that made them suitable for applications in different fields such as medicine (Levis and Deasy 2002; Lvov et al. 2008; Shchukin et al. 2008; Abdullayev et al. 2009; Veerabadran et al. 2009; Hughes and King 2010; Zhai et al. 2010), electronics, polymers (Du et al. 2010) and catalysis (Du et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2011), but there are few reports to the best of our knowledge concerning the assembled Co3O4 on the surface of HNTs and its photocatalytic activity.

In this paper, we demonstrate a novel route to the synthesis of Co3O4/HNTs nanocomposites via assembling the Co3O4 nanoparticles on the outer surface of HNTs, which was called the incipient wetness impregnation (Delannoy et al. 2006; Azadi et al. 2010) based on the difference in the interface energies of organic and aqueous solutions with the HNTs surface.

Experimental

The halloysite nanotubes (HNTs), obtained from Hunan, China, was firstly dispersed and dried for 12 h at 80 °C. All chemicals were analytical grade and used without further purification. Co3O4/HNTs nanocomposites were synthesized as follows: 500 mg of halloysite was mixed with 10 mL of ethylbenzene, ultrasonically treated for 10 min to form the HNTs slurry. In the second step, 50, 125, 250, 500 and 750 mg of cobalt acetate (Co(AC)2·4H2O) were dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water according to the designed Co3O4/HNTs mass ratios (1:2, 1:3, 1:6, 1:12 and 1:30). The solution was then slowly added to 500 mg of above HNTs slurry using a Pasteur pipet, while continuously stirring the paste with a glass stick. The mixture was dried at 323 K for 10 h, subsequently heated in static air at 623 K for 3 h with a heating rate of 50 °C/min to finally form Co3O4/HNTs composites. For comparison, pure Co3O4 nanoparticles were prepared according to the above procedure without the addition of halloysite, and Co3O4+HNTs (mix) were also synthesized according to the above procedure without the addition of organic solvent.

The crystalline phases were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis with a RIGAKU D/max-2550VB+ 18 kW powder diffractometer with Cu Kα-radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The data were collected from 10° to 80° of 2θ with a scanning speed in 2° min−1. The crystal sizes (D) of cobalt oxides were estimated according to the Scherrer’s equation: D = 0.9 λ/βcosθ, where λ is the X-ray wavelength, β is the full width of the reflection at half height and θ is the diffraction angle. JSM-6700F field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL IEM-200CX) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDAX) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV were used in this analysis. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 5700 spectrophotometer using KBr pellets for samples. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the samples were recorded by Hitachi F-4500 under the excitation light at 254 nm.

The photocatalytic activity of Co3O4/HNTs was investigated according to the photodegradation of methyl blue (MB). The photodegradation experiments were carried out in a closed box. In each experiment, 50 mg of the sample was suspended in 250 mL of 200 mg/L MB aqueous solution. The temperature of the reactant solution was maintained below 288 K by a flow of cooling water. UV radiation source was a 60 W high-pressure mercury lamp. Absorbance variations of MB aqueous before and after photocatalysis for different times were measured on 756P spectrophotometer (Shanghai, China). The decolorization ratio of contaminant was calculated by the following formula: D = (A 0 − A t )/A 0 × 100 %; here, A t is the absorbance of the contaminant solution at different reaction time t and A 0 is the initial MB solution.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 showed the XRD patterns of HNTs, pure Co3O4, Co3O4+HNTs(mix) and Co3O4/HNTs samples. For the HNTs sample, all of the observed diffraction lines were indexed to the characteristic of halloysite. However, three new diffraction lines at 2θ = 44.8, 59.4, 65.2 and a stronger diffraction line at 2θ = 36.8 can be observed. XRD patterns of pure Co3O4 and corresponding composites with HNTs all demonstrated the successful preparation of Co3O4 according to JCPDS 42-1467, but the XRD patterns of HNTs changed to some degree during the process. The diffraction lines became stronger with an increasing amount of Co3O4 (Fig. 2), and any other impurities were not detected. The crystal size of the Co3O4 nanoparticles calculated by the Scherrer’s equation was 3–5 nm.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of HNTs, pure Co3O4, Co3O4+HNTs(mix) and Co3O4/HNTs

Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD patterns of the Co3O4/HNTs with different Co3O4/HNTs mass ratios

FTIR spectra of the HNTs and Co3O4/HNTs were used to investigate the composition and structure of the resultant samples. The Co3O4/HNTs possessed some obvious signals attributed to HNTs (Fig. 3), such as the deformations of Al–O–Si and Si–O–Si at 536 and 462 cm−1, and two weak bands at 3,448 and 1,635 cm−1 were respectively attributed to the intercalated water and the surface –OH groups H-bonded to interlayer water. HNTs also exhibited two Al2OH-stretching bands at 3,698 and 3,630 cm−1, each –OH being linked to two Al atoms, and single Al2OH–bending band at 914 cm−1, respectively. Compared to HNTs, the IR spectrum of Co3O4/HNTs displayed a distinct band at 662 cm−1 originated from the stretching vibration of the metal–oxygen bonds, which was attributed to the ABO3 vibration (A denoted the Co2+ in a tetrahedral hole). The Si–O broad stretching band around 1,034 cm−1 shifted to 1,045 cm−1, indicating the existence of hydrogen bonding between Co3O4 and outer surfaces of HNTs. No other changes in the IR spectra of HNTs was observed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

FTIR spectra of HNTs and Co3O4/HNTs

The majority of the samples consisted of cylindrical tubes with 50–75 nm in diameter and 0.5–3 μm in length (Fig. 4). FESEM image revealed the empty lumen structure of HNTs with 15–30 nm in diameter (Fig. 4a), consistent with the corresponding TEM image (Fig. 4b). After loaded, a large amount of small Co3O4 nanoparticles were deposited on the surface of the HNTs (Fig. 5a), which made the surface of Co3O4/HNTs become more rough. The corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) indicated that Co3O4/HNTs composites were composed of the elements Al, Si, Co, and O (Fig. 5b), and the Cu peaks originated from the holey carbon-Cu grid. TEM and HRTEM images also demonstrated the location of the smaller Co3O4 nanoparticles on the whole external surface of HNTs (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a SEM and b TEM images of halloysite

Fig. 5
figure 5

a FESEM image of Co3O4/HNTs and b EDX spectrum of Co3O4 nanoparticles on the external surface of HNT, c, e TEM and d, f corresponding HRTEM images of Co3O4/HNTs

Assembling nanoparticles outside the closed HNTs was a challenging task. The used organic solvent has a low surface tension, will remain inside the nanotubes but protect its inner surface from metal deposition. Here we selected ethylbenzene as organic solvent with high boiling point (409 K) and low solubility (1.6 × 10−2). The two-step impregnation can be described was as follows (Fig. 6). In the first step, we impregnated the HNTs with organic solvent, which will wet and fill the nanotubes easily. Organic solvent often had a high vapor pressure, and their evaporation was very fast; therefore, it was put in excess in order to ensure the complete filling of the HNTs and the protection of the inner tubes from metal deposition. Secondly, an aqueous solution containing the metal precursor was added, but could not penetrate the HNTs due to its higher liquid/solid interface energy. Thus, the inner remained protected and the nanoparticles deposition only happened on the outer surface.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Schematic view of the selective deposition of nanoparticles outside HNTs

The photocatalytic activities of Co3O4/HNTs, Co3O4+HNTs (mix), Co3O4 and HNTs were shown in Fig. 7. Pure HNTs showed nearly no photocatalytic effect but an absorption of 50 % of MB. Compared with the other samples, the efficiency of Co3O4/HNTs could reach as high as 79 % in 20 min and above 90 % in 2 h. In the photocatalytic process, halloysite was used as clay stabilizer to prevent the aggregation of Co3O4 and to enhance their photocatalytic. Co3O4 dispersed on the outer surface of HNTs would be more active than that on the inner surface because there was no photocatalysis activity when Co3O4 was dispersed on the inner surface. Figure 8 gave the experimental results of MB degradation at different Co3O4/HNTs mass ratio. Actually, the Co3O4/HNTs had an excellent degradation (90 %) at Co3O4/HNTs mass ratio of 1:6, better than the others. The differences in photocatalytic activities between Co3O4/HNTs composite and other samples could be owing to the differences of their light absorption properties. Effective separation of the photogenerated charge carriers was acknowledged to be an important role on the high photocatalytic activity. So the room-temperature PL technique was employed to investigate the migration, transfer and recombination processes of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs on the as-synthesized samples (Chen et al. 2012). The lower the PL intensity, the higher the efficiency in photogenerated electron–hole separation, thus the higher photocatalytic activity. As shown in Fig. 9, the Co3O4/HNTs composite with 1:6 mass ratio sample showed the lowest PL peak intensity.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Degradation of MB with Co3O4/HNTs, Co3O4+HNTs(mix), Co3O4 and HNTs

Fig. 8
figure 8

Degradation of MB with the different Co3O4/HNTs mass ratio

Fig. 9
figure 9

PL spectra of the samples with different Co3O4/HNTs mass ratio

The effect of Co3O4/HNTs (1:6 sample) amount on the photocatalytic activity to the MB degradation was shown in Fig. 10, clearly indicating that the photocatalytic activity of Co3O4/HNTs could reach max 97 % at the Co3O4/HNTs amount of 150 mg. The UV irradiation (hν) activated Co3O4 to generate yield electrons (e) and holes (h), the yielded electrons (e) then reacted with the dissolved oxygen to produce superoxide anion radicals, while the holes were scavenged by the adsorbed water to form hydroxyl radicals (Pauporté et al. 2005). Finally, the active species (holes, superoxide anion radical or hydroxyl radical) oxidized the MB molecules adsorbed on the active sites of the Co3O4/HNTs system to enhance the photodegradation (Fig. 11). The whole photocatalytic reaction could be described as following:

Fig. 10
figure 10

Degradation of MB with the different amount of Co3O4/HNTs (1:6 sample)

Fig. 11
figure 11

Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic activity enhancement

$$ {\text{Co}}_{3} {\text{O}}_{4} + h\nu \to {\text{Co}}{}_{3}{\text{O}}_{4} + (h + e) $$
(1)
$$ {\text{Co}}_{3} {\text{O}}_{4} (e) + {\text{O}}_{2} \to {\text{Co}}{}_{3}{\text{O}}_{4} + {\text{O}}_{2}^{ \cdot - } $$
(2)
$$ {\text{Co}}_{3} {\text{O}}_{4} (h) + {\text{OH}}^{ - } \to {\text{Co}}{}_{3}{\text{O}}_{4} + \cdot {\text{OH}} $$
(3)
$$ {\text{Co}}_{3} {\text{O}}_{4} (h) + \cdot {\text{OH}} + {\text{O}}_{2}^{ \cdot - } + {\text{MB}} \to {\text{CO}}_{2} + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + {\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - } + {\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - } + {\text{Cl}}^{ - } $$
(4)

Conclusions

Co3O4 nanoparticles were successfully supported onto HNTs to prepare Co3O4/HNTs nanocomposites via incipient wetness impregnation method. The Co3O4/HNTs showed higher photodegradation activity to methyl blue than Co3O4+HNTs(mix), HNTs and pure Co3O4 nanoparticles. Particularly, the nanocomposites reached a high degradation of 97 %. The combination of the photocatalytic property of Co3O4 and the adsorptivity of HNTs endowed the as-prepared material with a bright perspective in environmental field.