Introduction

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a high-risk surgical procedure that is primarily indicated for carcinomas of the pancreatic head or periampullary region. Due to advances in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and interventional radiology, postoperative mortality associated with PD has declined; however, postoperative morbidity remains as high as 50%, even in specialized pancreatic units [1,2,3,4,5,6].

The prognosis for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma has improved over recent years, and long-term survival after PD is increasing. In addition, the indication for PD has been extended to low-grade malignancies (e.g., intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) [3,4,5], which has led to an increase in hepaticojejunostomy of non-dilated bile ducts. However, the majority of studies on morbidity after PD have focused on short-term surgical outcomes, and only a few studies have reported on long-term outcomes such as hepatic steatosis or cholangitis [3, 7,8,9,10,11,12].

Postoperative cholangitis, which is thought to be caused by anastomotic strictures, is one of the major late complications after PD [7, 10, 11]. Although cholangitis has a negative impact on quality of life, long-term clinical outcomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, the definition of cholangitis after PD is not unified, making it more difficult to discuss disease management. Clinical features, including the frequency and timing of episodes, and treatment as well as risk factors for postoperative cholangitis after PD remain to be clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of postoperative cholangitis after PD.

Methods

Patients

Between January 2007 and December 2013, 155 consecutive patients underwent PD at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital. Of these, 113 patients with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: death within 1 year (21 patients), change of hospital (17 patients), prior choledochojejunostomy due to congenital choledochal cysts (2 patients), prior liver resection due to hepatocellular carcinoma and a liver abscess following transarterial chemoembolization (1 patient), and postoperative acquired hemophilia, a rare complication [13], with an atypical postoperative course (1 patient) (Fig. 1). Information was obtained from a prospective database combined with the hospital’s electronic patient record system. This retrospective, observational, single-center study was approved by the committee on life science and bioethics of Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (Permission no. 2132).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram. Overview of patient enrollment. PD pancreaticoduodenectomy

Definition of cholangitis

Standard criteria for the diagnosis of acute cholangitis were first defined in the 2007 Tokyo Guidelines based on a literature review and an expert consensus at the International Consensus Meeting for the Management of Acute Cholecystitis and Cholangitis [14]. The Tokyo Guidelines were revised in 2013 (TG13) with new standard criteria for the diagnosis of acute cholangitis [15]. In the TG13, diagnosis of acute cholangitis consists of three categories: systemic inflammation (A), cholestasis (B), and imaging (C). Each category has 2 items as follows: category A, ‘fever and/or shaking/chills’ and ‘laboratory data: evidence of inflammatory response’; category B, ‘jaundice’ and ‘laboratory data: abnormal liver function’; and category C, ‘biliary dilatation’ and ‘evidence of the etiology on imaging’. To make a definitive diagnosis, one item from each of the three categories (A–C) is required [15]. In this study, postoperative cholangitis was diagnosed according to the TG13 criteria. ‘Refractory cholangitis’ was defined as at least three episodes of cholangitis after PD. Cholangitis due to tumor recurrence or metastasis was not included. According to House et al., biliary strictures were defined as radiologic-proven strictures at the level of the hepaticojejunostomy with obstructive jaundice in the setting of cholangitis [10]. All postoperative biliary strictures were confirmed by interventional radiology with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) or double balloon endoscopy (DBE). Patients without intrahepatic biliary tract dilatation were examined by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to determine the presence of biliary strictures.

Surgical procedure

Most patients underwent subtotal stomach-preserving PD, in which the pylorus ring was resected while preserving more than 95% of the stomach. Conventional PD with gastrectomy or pylorus-preserving PD was occasionally performed. Reconstruction was mainly performed using the ante-colic Roux-en-Y method until 2011, and thereafter was changed to the modified Child’s method with Braun’s anastomosis [16]. Pancreaticojejunostomy was performed using the modified Blumgart method [17, 18]. Bile duct transection was made at the upper level of the junction of the cystic and common hepatic ducts, and hepaticojejunostomy was performed by single-layer, interrupted suture with an absorbable 4-0 or 5-0 thread. Stenting requirements for biliary anastomosis were decided by the surgeon on a case-by-case basis. All surgical procedures were performed by 10 pancreatic surgeons.

Early postoperative complications

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was diagnosed according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) guidelines [19]. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) were diagnosed using the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) guidelines [20, 21]. Bile leakage was diagnosed according to the International Study Group on Liver Surgery (ISGLS) guidelines [22]. These complications were considered to be clinically relevant if classified as grade B or C severity.

Follow-up after hospital discharge

Patients with an uneventful postoperative course were followed-up every 3–6 months, and blood tests and imaging studies were performed at least once every 6 months. As per clinical routine, patients with complications such as tumor recurrence were followed-up more regularly for testing and additional treatment. These laboratory data obtained after hospital discharge were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

The clinical characteristics of patients with and without refractory cholangitis were compared using the Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with a P value <0.05 were incorporated into a logistic regression model to examine the risk factors for refractory cholangitis. Risk factors are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) and P values. Data are expressed as median values (range). P < 0.05 was considered to denote a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Patients’ characteristics

The clinical characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1. Among the 113 patients, the median age was 68 years (range 42–86 years), 73.5% were male, and the most common indication for PD was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (33.6%). The incidences of clinically relevant POPF, DGE, PPH, and bile leakage were 20.4, 15.9, 3.5, and 2.7%, respectively. The median length of follow-up was 40 months (range 12–99 months).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients (n = 113)

Refractory cholangitis after PD

The clinical characteristics of refractory cholangitis are presented in Table 2. Refractory cholangitis developed in 21 patients (18.6%). There were 143 episodes in all, and the median number of episodes was 5 (range 3–13 episodes) among these patients. Five patients (23.8%) developed more than 10 episodes. The median time to the first episode after PD was 7 months (range 2–23 months), and the first episode occurred within a year in 17 patients (81%). The median number of urgent admissions due to cholangitis was 2 (range 0–7).

Table 2 Refractory cholangitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Biliary strictures were found in 10 patients (by PTC in 5 and by DBE in 5). All 10 patients with strictures required radiologic or endoscopic treatment for dilatation, and 5 of the 10 patients had intrahepatic cholelithiasis. Patients with strictures required an average of 2 dilatations to achieve remission. None of the patients with strictures developed cholangitis after the last dilatation, although repeated dilatations were needed in some patients. The 11 patients without strictures were usually treated with pharmacological agents, most often with antibiotics. More patients with strictures required urgent admissions due to cholangitis than those without strictures (57 vs. 14%, P = 0.004). Despite pharmacotherapy, patients without strictures experienced recurrent cholangitis compared to patients with strictures (average interval of cholangitis: 5.3 and 8.3 months, respectively).

The cumulative incidence rate of refractory cholangitis after PD is shown in Fig. 2. The 1-year cumulative incidence rate was 15.0% (95% CI 8.33–21.67), and the 2-year incidence rate was 18.9% (95% CI 11.65–26.15).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cumulative incidence rate of refractory cholangitis. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the likelihood of developing refractory cholangitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The 1-year cumulative incidence rate was 15.0% (95% CI 8.33–21.67), and the 2-year rate was 18.9% (95% CI 11.65–26.15)

Risk factors for refractory cholangitis

Risk factors for refractory cholangitis were divided into three categories: preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors. All factors were analyzed as univariate predictors (Table 3).

Table 3 Risk factors for refractory cholangitis by univariate analysis

Univariate analysis of preoperative factors demonstrated that younger age and benign disease were risks for refractory cholangitis, whereas obstructive jaundice and biliary drainage were protective. Preoperative cholangitis and laboratory data were not predictive of refractory cholangitis.

Among the operative factors, operation time over 500 min correlated with refractory cholangitis. Estimated blood loss of >1000 mL tended to be more frequent in the refractory cholangitis group (P = 0.062). The reconstruction method, Roux-en-Y or modified Child’s method, did not influence the incidence of refractory cholangitis.

Analysis of postoperative factors demonstrated that refractory cholangitis was associated with clinically relevant POPF, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) value before hospital discharge, elevated γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GTP), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) after hospital discharge, and the presence of pneumobilia on imaging studies. Bile leaks after PD are uncommon [10]. We experienced bile leaks in only three patients (2.7%), and bile leaks were not predictive of refractory cholangitis.

Univariate analysis for refractory cholangitis identified ten significant risk factors: younger age, benign disease, without preoperative obstructive jaundice, without preoperative biliary drainage, long operation time, relevant POPF, perioperative CRP, postoperative γ-GTP and ALP, and the presence of pneumobilia.

Multivariate analysis revealed that risk factors for refractory cholangitis were: benign disease (OR 18.52; 95% CI 3.56–100; P = 0.001), long operation time (OR 18.73; 95% CI 3.07–114.38; P = 0.002), elevated CRP (OR 6.55; 95% CI 1.46–29.44; P = 0.0014), elevated ALP after discharge (OR 6.03; 95% CI 1.36–26.81; P = 0.018), and the presence of pneumobilia (OR 28.81; 95% CI 2.32–357.69; P = 0.009) (Table 4).

Table 4 Risk factors for refractory cholangitis by multivariate analysis

Discussion

Although postoperative cholangitis is one of the major late complications after PD, few data are available. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with refractory cholangitis after PD using the standardized definition for the diagnosis of cholangitis from the TG13.

The results demonstrated that 18.6% of patients developed refractory cholangitis and suffered several episodes and emergent hospitalizations. Most cases of refractory cholangitis developed within a year after PD. Postoperative refractory cholangitis is one of the most troublesome of the long-term complications after PD. In previous studies, frequencies of cholangitis after PD were 5% [3] and 6.7% [12], which were lower than in our study (18.6%). However, it is difficult to make between-study comparisons because of the lack of definitions of cholangitis in those reports. We hypothesized that there were more patients with benign disease and with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) who had a non-dilated common bile duct in our study (35.4%) than in those previous reports (25.2% [3] and 17.2% [12]) and that some of those patients developed cholangitis. Indeed, of 21 patients with refractory cholangitis, 16 patients (76%) had benign disease or IPMC.

Postoperative cholangitis after hepaticojejunostomy in other types of surgery is also a serious complication. Cholangitis has been reported to occur in 16.7% of patients after liver transplantation [23] and in 10% of patients after biliary tract surgery [24]. In these cases, anastomotic strictures after hepaticojejunostomy may be the primary cause of postoperative cholangitis. Studies suggested that the incidence of biliary strictures after PD ranges from 2.6 to 7.4%, and most cases of cholangitis are considered to be related to biliary strictures [10, 11, 25]. In contrast, in the present study, over 50% of patients who developed refractory cholangitis did not have biliary strictures. Cholangitis is known to occur even in the absence of intrahepatic biliary duct dilatation [26]. Some case reports on postoperative cholangitis without biliary strictures after PD [27] or liver transplantation [28] indicated that reflux of bile or intestinal juice into the biliary tree is responsible for cholangitis. Another case report suggested that non-obstructive afferent loop syndrome caused biliary stasis, leading to cholangitis [29].

Biliary strictures are generally considered to be manageable by radiologic or endoscopic dilatation. [25, 30] Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of biliary strictures are essential to prevent secondary biliary cirrhosis [31]. Dilatation interventions are often needed repeatedly. According to a previous study, an average of 7.5 interventional treatments for obstructive cholangitis was required [10]. In this study, long-term remission was achieved in all 10 patients with an average of 2 dilatation treatments. Prawdzik et al. demonstrated that surgical re-reconstruction of hepaticojejunostomy strictures could be safely performed by an experienced pancreatic surgeon with low morbidity, and aggressive re-operation of hepaticojejunostomy was associated with optimal long-term outcomes [7]. However, this may be over-optimistic because re-operation can be challenging, and minimally invasive treatment such as radiologic or endoscopic dilatation should be performed as an initial step.

For patients with biliary strictures, dilatation of the stricture is a curative treatment. On the other hand, in patients without biliary strictures, cholangitis was usually not very severe and usually resolved through pharmacotherapy, but recurred repeatedly. Such treatment was not sufficient to result in a cure because the potential cause was not identified. Pharmacotherapy, mainly antibiotics, may be an acceptable means of management as a desperate measure. We established a flowchart on the management of refractory cholangitis (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Management of refractory cholangitis. PD pancreaticoduodenectom, US ultrasonography, CT computed tomography, PTC percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, DBE double balloon endoscopy

In this study, 5 risk factors for refractory cholangitis were identified: benign disease, long operation time, elevated CRP, ALP, and the presence of pneumobilia after discharge. There were 14 patients with benign disease in the refractory cholangitis group, 9 of which (64.3%) had biliary strictures. On the other hand, only one patient (14.3%) with malignant disease had biliary stricture. Benign disease was a risk factor for refractory cholangitis because patients with benign disease had a non-dilated common bile duct. Long operation time was also a risk factor for refractory cholangitis. Because the total operation time was affected by case-specific difficulties, such difficulties may underlie the relationship between operation time and the risk of refractory cholangitis. Elevated CRP and ALP levels were also risk factors for refractory cholangitis, but these laboratory data may be influenced by several factors. Postoperative pneumobilia after PD is a common finding, being observed in 60–90% of PD patients [32,33,34]. This study identified pneumobilia after PD as a risk factor for refractory cholangitis as it was detected in 76 patients (67.3%) regardless of biliary obstruction (Table 3). Among the 21 patients with refractory cholangitis, 19 patients had pneumobilia. In contrast, only 2 of the 37 patients without pneumobilia developed refractory cholangitis. It is noteworthy that patients without pneumobilia after PD rarely developed refractory cholangitis.

Our study was limited by its retrospective design and relatively small sample size. We reviewed past studies about postoperative cholangitis after PD; however, such studies were few and the definition of cholangitis varied among such studies. Prospective controlled studies with an international standardized definition of postoperative cholangitis after PD are needed. We believe that our findings might be of value for the future management of postoperative cholangitis after PD.

Conclusions

Postoperative refractory cholangitis after PD usually developed within a year. Almost half of the patients had biliary strictures, and aggressive dilatation might be effective to achieve remission in these patients.