Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common age-related disease leading to restrictions in daily activities of the elderly, characterised by the destruction of articular cartilage of synovial joints and secondary osteophyte formation [1]. Over the years, there has been strong evidence to suggest an association between joint inflammation and the progression of structural changes in OA [2, 3]. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, a proinflammatory cytokine, plays an important role in local immune response to invading organisms by initiating a cascade of reactions that culminates into inflammatory response to eliminate the invading organisms [4]. Previous studies had found that levels of TNF-α were elevated in the synovial fluid, synovial membrane, subchondral bone and cartilage [5, 6]. Therefore, TNF-α is considered to play an important role in the pathophysiology of OA [5].

The polymorphisms in the TNF-α promoter appear to play a role in the altered TNF-α gene expression [79], and thus the TNF-α promoter polymorphisms may serve as markers of susceptibility to OA. One study [10] observed that rs1800629 (TNF-α -308) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the TNF-α gene increased the risk for OA in a Korean population, however, another study failed to find the association of this SNP with OA in Western Mexico or the Turkish population [6, 11]. Meanwhile, no significant association between rs361525 SNP (TNF-α -238) and individual susceptibility to OA in a Western Mexico population was found [6]. However, the association of these two SNPs with OA in a Chinese population is unknown. Here, we performed a relatively large-scale case–control study to clarify the potential association between these two SNPs and OA patients from East China.

Methods

Subjects

A total of 200 Han patients with OA from East China were included. The two diagnostic criteria of OA were: (1) any symptom or sign of OA and (2) radiographic findings with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or more. Patients with other forms of arthritis, autoimmune disease, or drug dependence were excluded. For comparison, 305 Han healthy controls (HC) matching in sex, age, and area of residence were recruited. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant involved in this study. Detailed clinical data were recorded and blood samples were collected from all subjects.

Genetic analysis

Genomic DNA was collected from peripheral blood leucocytes in accordance with standard phenol-chloro-form procedures. ALL samples were genotyped for the TNF-α rs1800629 and rs361525 polymorphisms via TaqMan® 5’allelic discrimination technology using a predesigned SNP genotyping assay provided by Applied Biosystems, following manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting data were processed and analysed by the Sequence Detector System 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems, CA). For quality control, random cases (15 %) were processed twice in separate runs. Results were 100 % concordant.

Statistical analysis

To identify the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of SNP for OA patients and healthy controls, Fisher’s exact test was performed. The test was also performed to examine genotype and allele frequency for rs1800629 or rs361525 between OA patients and healthy controls. OR with 95 % adjusted by age and gender was estimated in order to identify the role of rs1800629 or rs361525 in OA. All analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

As shown in Table 1, the allele and genotype distributions for rs1800629 and rs361525 in the OA patients and HC did not deviate significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distribution of allele ‘A’ of TNF-α -308 in the OA group was significantly higher than that in the HC (p < 0.001, OR 1.9612, 95%CI 1.3323–2.8869), while no significant differences were found in the genotype frequencies for TNF-α -238 between OA patients and HC.

Table 1 Analysis of the genotype distribution and MAF of SNPs in OA and HC groups

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the relationship between TNF-α gene polymorphisms and individual susceptibility to OA in the Han Chinese population.

The TNF-α gene is located in the central major histocompatibility complex and encodes an important proinflammatory cytokine named TNF-α. Over the years, there has been strong evidence that in OA, TNF-α is one of the most important mediators which alters the balance of cartilage matrix degradation and repair, leading finally to cartilage breakdown [12].

In our study, we found that the allele ‘A’ of TNF-α -308 may increase the risk for OA in the Han Chinese population, which is consistent with the recent results from Korea [10], but not replicated in a Western Mexico or Turkish population [6, 11]. However, rs361525 SNP (TNF-α -238) did not modulate to the susceptibility and did not contribute to the phenotype of OA in the Han Chinese population, which is consistent with the results from the Western Mexico population [6].

As the minor allele frequency of allele ‘A’ of TNF-α -308 or -238 did not differ significantly among ethnicities, the differences of the ethnic group should not contribute to these inconsistent findings. It should be noted here that the studies of Munoz-Valle et al. [6] and Sezgin et al. [11], in which the OA patients/HC were only 50/100 and 151/84, respectively involved small sample sizes. This made it difficult to detect the genotype AA of TNF-α -308 or -238, whose percentage is only about 7 %, leading to the potential of false results. On the other hand, the TNF-α gene and the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class II/III region, in which some SNPs such as rs7775228 and rs10947262 were identified associated with susceptibility to knee OA [13, 14], are in a linkage disequilibrium state in the chromosome 6p21.3 region. Therefore, positive results shown in the study of Han et al. and our own study may be due to the linkage disequilibrium of the proximal susceptible SNPs. Further genetic research on the relationship between all SNPs in this chromosome region and OA is needed.

In conclusion, our initial research shows that in the Han Chinese population, the allele ‘A’ of TNF-α -308 may increase the risk for OA, whereas TNF-α -238 polymorphisms do not play a role in OA patients. More association studies with larger numbers of participants are needed to confirm the present findings.