Abstract
The inferior vena cava (IVC) is an important structure receiving a large amount of venous return and is associated with various congenital disorders. Advances in diagnostic imaging and its increasing accessibility have led to an increase in the incidental detection of IVC anomalies. Congenital anomalies of the IVC are not uncommon and are occasionally critical to treatment planning. However, they are frequently overlooked in abdominal imaging. The IVC is composed of four segments (intrahepatic, suprarenal, renal, and infrarenal), and each segment arises from different embryonic structures in a complex process. Anomalies of the IVC can be classified according to the involved segment. Familiarity with the variety of IVC anomalies seen on imaging is vital for correctly diagnosing and managing patients in daily practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Anomalies of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are not uncommon, existing in up to 8.7% of the population [1]. The embryogenesis of the IVC is complex; it develops between the 6th and 8th weeks after conception [2]. With the increased use of cross-sectional imaging, various anomalies of the IVC are frequently encountered in clinical practice and can be misdiagnosed as mass-like lesions or lymph nodes [3]. Although most patients with congenital anomalies of the IVC are asymptomatic, some could present with symptoms or abnormal laboratory findings. It is especially important to recognize an IVC anomaly prior to vascular surgery or other interventional procedures because unexpected complications can arise [4,5,6]. For example, in patients with double IVC, an IVC filter should be inserted into the suprarenal IVC. Otherwise, pulmonary embolism could recur after IVC filter insertion [7]. Radiologists must therefore be familiar with IVC anomalies to correctly interpret them on cross-sectional images.
In this article, we describe the embryogenesis of the IVC and present imaging findings of various congenital anomalies, including interruption of the IVC with azygous continuation, retroaortic left renal vein, circumaortic left renal vein, retrocaval ureter, left-sided IVC, double IVC, and preaortic iliac confluence. In addition, we report one new variant: left IVC with hemiazygos continuation, retroaortic right renal vein, and the presence of a right suprarenal IVC.
Imaging techniques
Computed tomography (CT) is the most common imaging modality for initial identification of IVC anomalies. The portal venous phase (60–70 s after intravenous administration of 120–150 mL of contrast material at a rate of 3–5 mL/s) is widely used to evaluate IVC, although delaying the image after contrast material administration to 70–90 s shows uniform enhancement of the entire IVC [8]. To evaluate an IVC-anomaly-associated ureter, the excretory phase (12–15 min after administration of contrast material) is useful [8]. Multiplanar reformatted CT images can help practitioners recognize complex IVC anomalies. Magnetic resonance imaging can also be used to detect IVC anomalies without radiation exposure, making it especially valuable for pediatric patients [8, 9].
Embryonic development of the IVC
The IVC is composed of four segments (intrahepatic, suprarenal, renal, and infrarenal), and each segment arises from a different embryonic structure [1, 9]. During embryologic development, three pairs of cardinal veins (subcardinal, supracardinal, and posterior cardinal) run along each side of the aorta, and those veins form the segments of the IVC [1, 8, 9]. The vitelline vein arises from a capillary plexus of the yolk sac and develops into the intrahepatic segment. The subcardinal and supracardinal veins form the suprarenal, renal, and infrarenal segments of IVC. The subcardinal and supracardinal veins are ventromedial and dorsomedial to the posterior cardinal veins, respectively. Normally, the right vitelline, right subcardinal, and right supracardinal veins form the IVC, and the left subcardinal and supracardinal veins regress during embryogenesis. The azygos and hemiazygos veins are derived from the supracardinal veins in the thoracic region. Several midline anastomotic channels occur between the paired veins: the inter-subcardinal, inter-supracardinal, and inter-posterior cardinal anastomoses. Among these anastomotic channels, the inter-subcardinal vein develops into the left renal vein [1, 2, 7, 9]. Both iliac veins arise from the posterior cardinal veins, and the inter-posterior cardinal anastomosis forms the common iliac venous confluence posterior to the aorta in the pelvis (Table 1, Fig. 1) [9,10,11].
Anomalies of the IVC
Anomalies of the IVC can be classified according to the involved segment; each will be discussed in turn. Most IVC anomalies are related to the left renal vein or double IVC.
Anomaly of the suprarenal segment
Interruption of the IVC with azygos continuation
Azygos continuation of the suprarenal IVC results from a failure to develop the right subcardinal-hepatic anastomosis (Fig. 2A). This anomaly, termed absence of intrahepatic IVC, has a prevalence of 0.6% and is attributable to atrophy of the right subcardinal vein [6, 9]. The suprarenal segment of the IVC continues posteriorly to the diaphragmatic crura and subsequently enters the thorax as the azygos vein [12]. Elongated azygos and hemiazygos veins can be misidentified as lymphadenopathy [13]. Interruption of the IVC with azygos continuation is also commonly associated with heterotaxy syndrome (Fig. 2) [14].
Anomalies of the left renal vein
Retroaortic left renal vein
The prevalence of a retroaortic left renal vein is as high as 3.4% [12]. This anomaly results from a persistent inter-supracardinal anastomosis with regression of the inter-subcardinal anastomosis (Fig 3A). The inter-subcardinal anastomosis is positioned in front of the aorta and normally forms the left renal vein. In contrast, the inter-supracardinal anastomosis goes behind the aorta and typically develops into the retroaortic left renal vein [7] (Fig. 3). Two or more retroaortic left renal veins can exist (Fig. 4). It is important to recognize a retroaortic left renal vein before performing a left nephrectomy.
Circumaortic left renal vein (circumaortic venous ring)
A circumaortic left renal vein arises from the persistence of both the inter-subcardinal and inter-supracardinal anastomoses (Fig. 5A). Thus, two or more left renal veins are located ahead of and behind the aorta, forming a ring-like appearance. The retroaortic renal vein is derived from the inter-supracardinal anastomosis and is caudally located with respect to the preaortic renal vein, which arises from the inter-subcardinal anastomosis [12] (Fig. 5). The cranially located preaortic vein receives the left adrenal vein, and the caudally positioned retroaortic vein receives the left gonadal vein [9]. Posterior nutcracker syndrome can occur when a persistent posterior branch is compressed between the aorta and a vertebral body [15].
Anomalies of the infrarenal segment
Retrocaval ureter (circumcaval ureter)
A retrocaval ureter is an uncommon anomaly that presents with the ureter partially encasing the IVC. In this condition, the infrarenal segment of the IVC consists of the right posterior cardinal vein instead of the right supracardinal vein (Fig. 6A). In contrast to the supracardinal vein, which is located posterior and medial to the ureter, the posterior cardinal vein lies anterior and lateral to the ureter. As a result, the ureter goes along the posterior and medial aspect of the IVC and partially encases it [7]. Most often, a retrocaval ureter occurs on the right side [9] (Fig. 6). Recurrent urinary tract infections and ureteral obstruction are frequent in patients with a circumcaval ureter. If necessary, treatment involves surgical relocation of the ureter [7, 9].
Left IVC
A left-sided IVC results from the persistence of the left supracardinal vein with regression of the right supracardinal vein (Fig. 7A). It has a prevalence of 0.2% to 0.5% and represents the mirror image of the normal configuration. The left-located IVC ends at the left renal vein, which runs anterior to the aorta and finally forms a normal right-sided suprarenal IVC [9, 16]. Caudally, a left IVC connects with both iliac veins (Fig. 7).
Double IVC
The prevalence of a double IVC might be as high as 3%. This anomaly represents the persistence of both supracardinal veins [2, 9] (Fig. 8A). The IVC along the left side of the aorta joins the left renal vein, as a left IVC would. The right-sided IVC connects to the right common iliac vein, whereas the left-sided IVC continues on to the left common iliac vein (Fig. 8) [7]. Recurrent episodes of pulmonary embolism after IVC filter insertion occur in patients with a double IVC. On cross-sectional imaging, the left-located IVC can be misdiagnosed as lymphadenopathy.
Anomaly of the common iliac venous confluence
Preaortic iliac confluence
A preaortic iliac confluence is a very unusual anomaly of the IVC. In patients with this anomaly, the iliac vein confluence or the left common iliac vein is located anterior to the aortic bifurcation or right common iliac artery (Fig. 9). The first report of a preaortic iliac confluence was in 1929 [17], but few cases have been described since then [11, 18,19,20]. During the first trimester of pregnancy, the circumumbilical venous ring surrounds the future common iliac arteries. Normally, the ventral limb of the circumumbilical venous ring regresses, whereas the dorsal limb, which consists of the inter-posterior cardinal anastomosis, forms the common iliac venous confluence behind the aortic bifurcation (Fig. 1A, C). In patients with a preaortic iliac confluence, however, the dorsal limb of the circumumbilical venous ring is interrupted, and the common iliac venous confluence is derived from the persistent ventral limb, which lies anterior to the aortic bifurcation. [1, 10, 11, 21]. While uncommon in humans, a preaortic iliac confluence is normal in marsupials; thus, this anomaly is often called a “marsupial cava” [11].
Complex anomalies
More than one IVC anomaly can coexist in a patient. Complex anomalies of the IVC are often associated with congenital disorders.
Right double IVC with retrocaval ureter and preaortic left iliac vein
A right double IVC is an extremely rare anomaly that occurs when two infrarenal IVCs lie to the right of the aorta. Doyle et al. [22] first described ipsilateral duplication of the IVC, and since then, only around a dozen cases have been reported [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Most cases of a right double IVC have shown a ventral and dorsal relationship between the two vessels. Nagashima et al. [25] suggested a theory for the development of a right double IVC: the right sub- and supracardinal veins both persist (Fig. 10A). The IVC derived from the right subcardinal vein is located ventrally, and the IVC arising from the right supracardinal vein is positioned dorsally. The ventral limb of the circumumbilical venous ring forms the left common iliac vein, similar to a marsupial cava, and connects with the ventral IVC anterior to the right common iliac artery. The dorsal-sided IVC continues to the right common iliac vein, passing behind the right common iliac artery. As a result, the right common iliac artery lies between the two common iliac veins [25, 28]. There might or might not be an anastomosis between the iliac veins, and the right ureter can go between the right double IVCs and be compressed by them (Fig. 10) [28].
Double IVC interruption with azygos and hemiazygos continuation in heterotaxy
The interruption of a double IVC with azygos and hemiazygos continuation arises from agenesis of both subcardinal veins, accompanied by the persistence of both supracardinal veins (Fig. 11A) [12, 29]. As mentioned earlier, interruption of the IVC is associated with heterotaxy syndrome [30]. We found a double IVC interruption with azygos and hemiazygos continuation in a patient with situs ambiguous presenting with a midline liver, polysplenia, and a short pancreas (Fig. 11). The right-sided IVC continued up to the azygos vein, and the left-sided IVC was connected to the hemiazygos vein. Renal venous flow drained to both ipsilateral IVCs without a midline-crossing renal vein, thus forming an independent trunk for each IVC below the diaphragm.
IVC interruption with azygos continuation in a patient with situs inversus totalis
Situs inversus totalis refers to the total transposition of the thoracic and abdominal viscera, a mirror image of the normal configuration, which is termed situs solitus. The prevalence is 0.01%. The bilobed lung, cardiac apex, stomach, and spleen are right-sided structures, and the trilobed lung, liver, gallbladder, and IVC are left-sided structures in patients with situs inversus totalis [31,32,33]. In this situation, a left-located retrocrural vein functions as an anatomical azygos vein and a right-positioned vein functions as an anatomical hemiazygos vein. IVC interruption can exist in patients with situs inversus totalis, and the failure to form a subcardinal–intrahepatic anastomosis is similar to what is seen in IVC interruption with azygos continuation in a situs solitus patient (Fig. 12).
Left IVC interruption with hemiazygos continuation, retroaortic right renal vein, and the presence of a right suprarenal IVC
We discovered a patient with left IVC interruption with hemiazygos continuation, a retroaortic right renal vein, and a right suprarenal IVC. In this subject, both common iliac veins formed the left-sided IVC, which continued up to the hemiazygos vein. Subsequently, the hemiazygos vein crossed the midline mediastinum posterior to the right atrium and finally joined the superior vena cava. In addition, there was a small right suprarenal IVC in the normal position with one retroaortic right renal vein. The larger left IVC and smaller suprarenal right IVC communicated via a retroaortic right renal vein without a midline-crossing left renal vein (Fig. 13). Usually, the retroaortic right renal vein is accompanied by a double IVC interruption with hemiazygos continuation, and in that situation, there are bilateral infrarenal IVCs and a left suprarenal IVC [9, 30] (Fig. 14). Our subject, however, showed a left infrarenal IVC and bilateral suprarenal IVCs with left IVC interruption with hemiazygos continuation. To the best of our knowledge, this particular IVC anomaly has not been reported prior to this article.
Conclusion
Congenital anomalies of the IVC are diverse and relatively common, resulting from abnormal development or regression during the complex process of embryogenesis. Although most patients with IVC anomalies are asymptomatic, the anomalies can be significant in daily practice. Familiarity with the variety of IVC anomalies seen on imaging is vital for correctly diagnosing and managing patients in daily practice.
Abbreviations
- IVC:
-
Inferior vena cava
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
References
Kellman GM, Alpern MB, Sandler M, Craig BM (1988) Computed tomography of vena caval anomalies with embryologic correlation. Radiographics 8(3):533–556
Mayo J, Gray R, St Louis E, et al. (1983) Anomalies of the inferior vena cava. Am J Roentgenol 140(2):339–345
Evans J, Earis J, Curtis J (2001) Thrombosed double inferior vena cava mimicking paraaortic lymphadenopathy. Br J Radiol 74(878):192–194
Mano A, Tatsumi T, Sakai H, et al. (2004) A case of deep venous thrombosis with a double inferior vena cava effectively treated by suprarenal filter implantation. Jpn heart J 45(6):1063–1069
Smith DC, Kohne RE, Taylor FC (1992) Steel coil embolization supplementing filter placement in a patient with a duplicated inferior vena cava. J Vasc Interv Radiol 3(3):577–580
Mathews R, Smith PA, Fishman EK, Marshall FF (1999) Anomalies of the inferior vena cava and renal veins: embryologic and surgical considerations. Urology 53(5):873–880
Kandpal H, Sharma R, Gamangatti S, et al. (2008) Imaging the Inferior vena cava: a road less traveled 1. Radiographics 28(3):669–689
Smillie RP, Shetty M, Boyer AC, et al. (2015) Imaging evaluation of the inferior vena cava. RadioGraphics 35(2):578–592
Bass JE, Redwine MD, Kramer LA, et al. (2000) Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings 1: (CME available in print version and on RSNA link). Radiographics 20(3):639–652
McClure CF, Butler EG (1925) The development of the vena cava inferior in man. Am J Anatomy 35(3):331–383
Panicek DM, O’Moore PV, Castellino RA (1992) Preaortic iliac venous confluence (“Marsupial cava”): a rare anomaly of the inferior vena cava. Urol Radiol 14(1):188–190
Minniti S, Visentini S, Procacci C (2002) Congenital anomalies of the venae cavae: embryological origin, imaging features and report of three new variants. Eur Radiol 12(8):2040–2055
Schultz CL, Morrison S, Bryan PJ (1984) Azygos continuation of the inferior vena cava: demonstration by NMR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(4):774–776
Lee FT Jr, Pozniak M, Helgerson R (1993) US case of the day. Polysplenia syndrome. Radiographics 13(5):1159–1162
Gibo M, Onitsuka H (1998) Retroaortic left renal vein with renal vein hypertension causing hematuria. Clin Imaging 22(6):422–424
Chuang VP, Mena CE, Hoskins PA (1974) Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava. Review of embryogenesis and presentation of a simplified classification. Br J Radiol 47(556):206–213
McClure CFW, Huntington GS (1929) The mammalian vena cava posterior: an ontogenetic interpretation of the atypical forms of vena cava posterior (inferior) found in the adult domestic cat (Felis domestica) and in man. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
de Souza Rocha M, Lourenço RB, Chang YS, et al. (2008) Preaortic iliac confluence (Marsupial vena cava): report of 4 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(5):706–709
Ruemenapf G, Rupprecht H, Schweiger H (1998) Preaortic iliac confluence: a rare anomaly of the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Surg 27(4):767–771
Shindo S, Kobayashi M, Kaga S, et al. (1999) Retrocaval ureter and preaortic iliac venous confluence in a patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Surg Radiol Anatomy 21(2):147–149
Jiménez R, Morant F (2011) The importance of venous and renal anomalies for surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Chennai: InTech
Doyle AJ, Melendez MG, Simons MA (1992) Ipsilateral duplication of the inferior vena cava. J Clin Ultrasound 20(7):481–485
Meyer D, Andresen R, Friedrich M (1998) Right-sided double inferior vena cava and common iliac vein: imaging with spiral computerized tomography. Aktuelle Radiol 8(3):148–150
Sénécail B, Josseaume T, Bobeuf J, et al. (2004) Right-sided duplication of the inferior vena cava. Morphologie 88(283):183–187
Nagashima T, Lee J, Andoh K, et al. (2006) Right double inferior vena cava: report of 5 cases and literature review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(4):642–645
Ng W, Ng S (2009) Double inferior vena cava: a report of three cases. Singapore Med J 50(6):211–213
Gong J, Jiang H, Liu T, et al. (2011) Imaging of partial right double vena cava with ureter crossing through its split, confirmed at surgery. Clin Imaging 35(2):148–150
Babu CR, Lalwani R, Kumar I (2014) Right double inferior vena cava (IVC) with preaortic iliac confluence–case report and review of literature. J Clin Diagn Res: JCDR 8(2):130
Koc Z, Oguzkurt L (2007) Interruption or congenital stenosis of the inferior vena cava: prevalence, imaging, and clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 62(2):257–266
Petik B (2015) Inferior vena cava anomalies and variations: imaging and rare clinical findings. Insights Imaging 6(6):631–639
Applegate KE, Goske MJ, Pierce G, Murphy D (1999) Situs revisited: imaging of the heterotaxy syndrome 1. Radiographics 19(4):837–852
Dalal J, Kalsey G, Rai H, et al. (2004) Situs inversus totalis. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol 1:35–36
Shogan PJ, Folio L (2011) Situs inversus totalis. Mil Med 176(7):840–843
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This work was supported by Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. For this type of study, formal consent was not required.
Informed consent
Statements of informed consent were not applicable because the manuscript contains no patient data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S.S., Shin, H.C., Hwang, J.A. et al. Various congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: review of cross-sectional imaging findings and report of a new variant. Abdom Radiol 43, 2130–2149 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1430-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1430-y