Introduction

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) was first described by Gessner in 1551 [1] and is associated with increased energy expenditure, insulin sensitivity, and decreased susceptibility to weight gain [26]. Present in approximately 5% of the adult population, it is more commonly found in women, thin patients, and children [79]. Thought to play a thermogenic role, brown adipocytes may be metabolically activated by sympathetic stimulation following exposure to cold [1013].

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a radioactive glucose analog taken up by metabolically active BAT and may be seen on positron emission tomography (PET) [14, 15]. Sites of FDG-avid BAT on PET include the neck, mediastinum, paravertebral region, and retroperitoneum [15, 16]. The intensity of radiotracer uptake is variable and may depend on seasonal variation in ambient temperature [12, 13]. Physiologic radiotracer accumulation in metabolically active BAT may be a source of false-positive interpretations or may obscure underlying metabolically active disease when present [17, 18]. Interventions that have been used to decrease 18F-FDG uptake by BAT include pre-medication with propranolol, fentanyl, and benzodiazepines [1923]. Alternatively, patient warming has been proposed as an attractive alternative to drug administration to reduce 18F-FDG uptake by BAT [24, 25]. To date, there is considerable variability in performing nuclear medicine studies between different institutions. In particular, departmental temperatures may vary and patient warming prior to PET/CT is not standardized.

In December 2007, we adopted a new protocol for patient warming prior to whole-body PET/CT. It has been shown that warming patients at a constant temperature of 24°C (75°F) for 30 min prior to and for 1 h after intravenous tracer administration can decrease FDG uptake by BAT [26]. The aim of this study is to determine if this effect is subject to seasonal variation.

Materials and methods

In accordance with the Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review was conducted to ascertain the seasonal variation in the effect of patient warming on 18F-FDG uptake by BAT. Based on prior reports, the temperature in the PET injection room was increased from approximately 21°C to a constant 24°C in December 2007 [24, 25].

Patient population

All patients referred to the Division of Nuclear Medicine at Children’s Hospital in Boston for whole-body 18F-FDG PET in 2008 were kept in the PET injection room at a constant 24°C (75°F) for 30 min before and until 1 h following tracer administration. There were 103 patients 21 years of age and younger (46% girls and 54% boys; mean age 14) who had an 18F-FDG PET in 2008 and who did not receive sedation or pre-medication known to alter FDG uptake by BAT. The average body mass index (BMI) was 22 kg/m2. The majority of patients were referred for the evaluation of oncologic conditions with a small minority referred for non-oncologic conditions such as infection. In total, these 103 patients completed 185 FDG PET scans in the 12-month period between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2008.

All patients referred to the Division of Nuclear Medicine for whole-body 18F-FDG PET prior to December 2007 underwent PET when the injection room temperature was approximately 21°C (70°F). There were 99 patients 21 years of age and younger (40% girls and 60% boys; mean age 14) who had an 18F-FDG PET between December 2006 and December 2007 and who did not receive pre-medication known to reduce FDG uptake by BAT. The average BMI was 22 kg/m2. The majority of patients were referred for the evaluation of oncologic conditions with a small minority of studies done for other indications such as the work-up of suspected infection. In total, the 99 patients in the control group completed 168 FDG PET scans in the 12-month period between 1 December 2006 and 30 November 2007.

Overall, patient characteristics in the warmed group and control group were similar with respect to age, gender, and BMI.

Image acquisition

Prior to having the 18F-FDG PET all patients were asked to fast for at least 4 h, to avoid caffeine, nicotine, or alcohol for 12 h, and not to perform strenuous exercise for 24 h. Warm and comfortable clothing was suggested for the day of the scan. The PET injection room temperature was maintained constant using an individualized thermostatic control and checked regularly using a thermometer. Patients warmed prior to the FDG PET were kept in the warmed, quiet, dimly lit injection room for 30 min before tracer administration and remained in this room for 1 h following intravenous radiopharmaceutical injection. For all patients, the radiopharmaceutical dose was calculated according to the patient weight using 5.55 MBq/kg (150 μCi/kg) with minimum and maximum administered dose of 18.5 MBq (500 μCi) and 370 MBq (10 mCi), respectively. Whole-body FDG PET was obtained on a GE Advance NXi PET scanner (GE Healthcare Technologies, Waukesha, WI, USA, a stand-alone PET scanner) using 2-D mode with 5-min emission and 3-min transmission scans per bed position. Patients were scanned from the skull base to mid-thigh; however, the axial field of view was extended to include sites of suspected or known tumor involvement outside this region.

Data analysis

The National Weather Service Forecast Office [27] was used to obtain daily outdoor temperatures for Boston, MA in 2006, 2007, and 2008. During the 12-month period between January and December 2008, the minimum outside temperature range on the days the 18F-FDG PET studies were performed was −13 to 22°C (9–72°F); the average outside temperature range was −11 to 27°C (12–81°F); the maximum outside temperature range was −10 to 35°C (14–95°F) (Fig. 1). During the 12-month period between December 2006 and November 2007, the minimum outside temperature range on the days the 18F-FDG PET studies were performed was −14 to 24°C (7–75°F); the average outside temperature range was −10 to 30°C (12–86°F); the maximum outside temperature range was −7 to 35°C (19–95°F) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Outdoor temperatures in Boston on days when the 18F-FDG PET studies were performed in patients who were warmed

Fig. 2
figure 2

Outdoor temperatures in Boston on days when the 18F-FDG PET studies were performed in patients who were not warmed (control group)

Two nuclear medicine physicians and one radiologist independently evaluated each PET scan for FDG uptake by BAT, and the final result was based on consensus. For each study, FDG accumulation in BAT was determined to be either present or absent. Tracer uptake in BAT was considered to be present when the uptake in characteristic areas of brown fat localization was greater than background soft tissue activity. Tracer uptake in BAT was considered to be absent if the uptake in the same areas was the same as in soft tissue. In each case, the pattern of uptake in BAT was consistent with the typical appearance described in the literature. A two-tailed Fisher exact probability test was used to compare the rate of uptake by BAT in patients who were warmed prior to scanning with those who were not.

Results

FDG uptake by BAT occurred in 16 of 185 (9%) FDG PET scans completed following preparation in the temperature-controlled room at 24°C (75°F). By comparison, FDG uptake by BAT occurred in 45 of 168 (27%) FDG PET scans performed when the injection room temperature was 21°C (70°F). This is statistically significant (p < 0.00001). Furthermore, 14 of 36 patients who had FDG uptake in BAT when the injection room temperature was 21°C (70°F) were also imaged when the injection room temperature was 24°C (75°F). Of these 14 patients, 13 (93%) did not have FDG uptake in BAT when the injection room temperature was 24°C (75°F), while 1 patient had persistent FDG uptake in BAT.

Meteorologists generally define four seasons demarcated by their average monthly temperature with the three warmest months constituting summer, the three coldest months constituting winter and the intervening months representing spring and autumn. For the purposes of this study, the winter months were considered to be December, January, and February. The spring months were considered to be March, April, and May. The summer months were considered to be June, July, and August. The fall months were considered to be September, October, and November.

Table 1 lists the average outside temperatures for the different seasons as well as the age and BMI of the patients. In the winter months (December–February), uptake by BAT occurred in 3% of studies in the temperature-controlled room at 24°C (75°F) compared with 28% when the injection room temperature was 21°C (70°F) (p < 0.005). In the spring months (March–May), uptake by BAT occurred in 13% of studies in the temperature-controlled room at 24°C (75°F) compared with 26% when the injection room temperature was 21°C (70°F) (p > 0.05). In the summer months (June–August), uptake by BAT occurred in 7% of studies in the temperature-controlled room at 24°C (75°F) compared with 35% when the injection room temperature was 21°C (70°F) (p < 0.001). In the fall months (September–November), uptake by BAT occurred in 11% of studies in the temperature-controlled room at 24°C (75°F) compared with 20% when the injection room temperature was 21°C (70°F) (p > 0.05). Figure 3 illustrates the seasonal variation in the effect of warming patients by controlling the room temperature prior to and during the 18F-FDG uptake period on 18F-FDG uptake by BAT. Figure 3 suggests that when the injection room temperature is 21°C (70°F), the number of PET scans with FDG accumulation in BAT is similar in the winter and summer. However, when the injection room temperature is 24°C (75°F) the number of PET scans with metabolically active BAT is reduced and this effect is most pronounced in the summer and winter.

Table 1 Outdoor temperature, BMI, age, and summary for each season in the period of 1 December 2006 to 30 November 2007 (listed as 2007) and 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 (listed as 2008). Intervals indicate one standard deviation from the mean
Fig. 3
figure 3

Seasonal variation in effect of patient warming on FDG uptake by BAT; patients who were warmed prior to 18F-FDG PET studies had significantly lower FDG uptake by BAT, particularly in the winter and summer

Discussion

FDG uptake by BAT is variable and may decrease rapidly in response to increased ambient temperature [28], anxiolytic medication [19], or sympathetic blockade [20]. This is in keeping with the theory that cold metabolically activates BAT through sympathetic stimulation and that metabolically active BAT accumulates FDG [11, 15].

Results in the literature suggest that FDG uptake by BAT is related to outdoor temperature. Cohade et al. reported an increased incidence of FDG-avid BAT while outside temperatures were low in a retrospective review of over 1,000 consecutive whole-body PET/CT scans done between July 2001 and June 2002 [12]. Kim et al. reported increased FDG uptake by BAT as an acute response to cold weather in over 1,000 consecutive whole-body PET/CT scans done between March 2000 and November 2003 [13]. Several studies have shown that FDG uptake by BAT may be decreased by warming patients prior to FDG PET. Christensen et al. studied ten patients with a history of hypermetabolic BAT on PET and showed that patient warming through the use of blankets could decrease FDG uptake by BAT [24]. Garcia et al. suggested that preparing patients in a temperature-controlled room prior to FDG PET could decrease tracer accumulation in BAT [25].

In December 2007, we adopted a new protocol for patient preparation prior to whole-body PET. In order to reduce FDG uptake by BAT, all patients referred for whole-body PET were warmed at a constant temperature of 24°C (75°F) for 30 min prior to and for 1 h after intravenous tracer administration. In a prior article, we showed that this simple and standardized protocol significantly decreased FDG uptake by BAT during the winter [26]. The current study provides data on the seasonal variation in the effect of this protocol on FDG uptake by BAT. We included a larger number of patients than previously reported studies and have focused on the pediatric population who, by their age, are at increased risk of FDG uptake in BAT.

Our study demonstrates a significantly decreased incidence of FDG uptake by BAT in patients who had FDG PET following warming in the temperature-controlled room at 24°C prior to and during tracer uptake. These results confirm prior results in the literature and emphasize the utility of ambient temperature control as an alternative approach to pharmacologic intervention [2426].

Our study also shows that patient warming to 24°C prior to and during tracer uptake is more effective in the winter and summer seasons compared with the spring and fall. In New England, during the spring and fall there are often rapid temperature changes. A possible explanation for the decreased effectiveness of patient warming during the spring and fall could be that rapid temperature changes causing metabolically active BAT result in a more lasting effect. In other words, once the BAT has become metabolically active, it is more resistant to becoming quiescent. However, further controlled studies are warranted.

There are limitations to this study. First, this study was not a randomized clinical controlled trial. The potential for selection bias was minimized by including all patients imaged in the two time frames except for those who were over 22 years of age or who had received pre-medication known to alter FDG uptake by BAT. The two groups of patients included were similar in terms of age, sex, and BMI. All patients were given the same instructions prior to imaging and the only parameter that was altered was exposure to the warmed injection room prior to and following FDG administration. It was assumed that exposure to outdoor temperatures prior to arrival in the department was similar. Second, the protocol for patient preparation prior to FDG PET including patient warming to 24°C was based on results suggested in the literature as well as on practical considerations for the patients. Further research on the most effective protocol for warming optimized for outdoor temperature could be beneficial. In particular, it might prove helpful to increase the temperature in the injection room or the time spent being warmed during the spring and fall. Our study suggests that in children the percentage of PET scans with FDG accumulation in BAT does not significantly change with season (Fig. 3). This is contrary to what has been suggested by many [7, 8, 12, 13] but not all [29] studies conducted in the adult population. The reason for this is not clear; it could be because children might not dress appropriately and are unprepared to deal with the effects of outdoor temperature change or indoor air-conditioning. In fact, it is possible that the total amount of BAT may depend on the ambient outdoor temperature, while the presence of metabolically active BAT depends on patient warming prior to tracer administration [15, 30]. It may therefore be important to report the indoor temperatures at the time the radiotracer was administered as well as the seasonal outdoor temperatures. Our sample size, though larger than previously published results, is still small. A large prospective controlled study in the pediatric population evaluating the warming preparation protocol prior to FDG PET on the presence of metabolically active BAT with respect to BMI and season may be warranted.

Conclusion

Obesity may play a role in the development of diabetes, the pathogenesis of vascular disease, and the incidence of cancer [3133]. BAT is thermogenic and can result in increased energy expenditure, decreased body weight, and a beneficial effect on glucose metabolism. However, FDG uptake in BAT has long been regarded as a source of false-positive and false-negative interpretations on FDG PET scans. Indeed, several methods have been used to reduce FDG uptake by BAT including pharmacologic intervention and patient warming. To date, there is no standardized protocol for preparing patients prior to PET. Our study describes a standardized protocol of maintaining the room temperature at a constant 24°C for 30 min prior to and during the uptake period that significantly decreases FDG uptake by BAT in children. This effect is most pronounced in the summer and winter.