Abstract
Anterior knee pain is the most common knee complaint. It may be due to a variety of soft tissue or osseous abnormalities. Knowledge of the radiologic appearance of the abnormalities allows more accurate diagnosis of the cause of the pain including chondral abnormalities, patellar instability and dislocation, femoral trochlear dysplasia, abnormal patellar location, bipartite patella, various tendinopathies, bursal inflammation, traction apophysitis in pediatric and adolescent patients, and miscellaneous diseases including mediopatellar plica syndrome and Hoffa’s disease. Radiographs are often obtained to exclude acute osseous abnormalities, such as fractures. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers superior soft tissue contrast resolution and allows for more accurate evaluation of the underlying etiology and therefore may improve treatment and possible surgical planning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Anterior knee pain (AKP) is the most common knee complaint, usually occurring in adolescents and young adults [1]. It is more common in athletic individuals, with the incidence rate as high as 9 % in young active adults and comprises up to a quarter of all knee problems treated at sports injury clinics [2, 3]. AKP may cause chronic disability, limited sports participation, and may affect quality of life. Despite its prevalence, AKP remains poorly understood, as it has not been well studied in the literature, making its treatment one of the most complex among the various pathologies affecting the knee [4]. Explanations for the poor understanding suggested by the International Patellofemoral Study Group include the complex biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint, less clinical interest in patellofemoral compartment abnormalities, various causes for AKP, and the lack of correlation between symptoms and physical or radiologic findings [5].
AKP is a nonspecific symptom that can result from various etiologies, including chondromalacia patella, patellar instability and dislocation, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta or baja, patellar tendinitis, bipartite patella, anterior knee bursitis, quadriceps or patellar tendon tear, plica syndromes, Hoffa’s disease, and traction apophysitis syndromes. Familiarity with diseases of the anterior knee is important in understanding the source of symptoms.
This article reviews several of the common causes of AKP, with emphasis on the clinical, radiographic, and MR imaging findings with the goal of allowing for a more accurate diagnostic understanding and improved treatment of this common complaint.
Discussion
Chondromalacia patella (CP)
Chondromalacia patella is a term applied to cartilage loss involving one or more portions of the patella that leads to patellofemoral pain. It was first described in 1908 by Budinger, who drew attention to the importance of cartilage lesions on the undersurface of the patella, which are characterized by fissures and softening [6]. Also known as “runner’s knee”, CP is more common in adolescents and young adults. The term chondromalacia is used by arthroscopists probing cartilage and finding regions of slight surface depression and/or surface fraying [7]. The possible relationship of CP and osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral compartment has not been clearly defined, with the later more common in the elderly population.
CP of the lateral facet appears to be secondary to prolonged patellar tilt and compression with eventual arthrosis, while CP of the medial facet may be secondary to deficient contact or a combination of compression and shearing forces, which occurs more commonly at the time of patellar dislocation and relocation [8].
Closed CP, which consists of simple softening of the cartilage with an intact surface, is common and may not be symptomatic. Once the surface layer has been interrupted, it is termed open CP. Importantly, the cartilage lesion in open chondromalacia would appear to be irreversible, as surface lesions do not heal [9].
Symptoms and findings in patients with CP are similar to those of other patellofemoral pain problems; namely, AKP worsened by climbing or descending stairs [10].
The radiograph may be normal or may demonstrate signs of articular cartilage loss, patellar malalignment, subchondral sclerosis, or other evidence of arthrosis. The extent of articular cartilage loss can be best determined using MRI. CP can be divided into four grades using the Outerbridge grading system (Table 1), which was originally devised for arthroscopy but has become the foundation of modified MRI grading [11, 12] (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4).
Reports indicate that the overall MRI sensitivity for detection of chondral lesions of the patellae ranges between 30 and 100 %, with a specificity between 50 and 94 % and a diagnostic accuracy between 77 and 90 % [13, 14]. In a study by Mattila et al., MRI scans detected grade I articular cartilage lesions of the patella with a sensitivity of only 20 % [15]. However, sensitivity was significantly higher for higher-grade lesions with 72 % sensitivity for grade 2 lesions and 100 % sensitivity for grade 3 and 4 lesions. The study by Mattila et al. showed that the grading of articular cartilage lesions of the patella based on arthroscopy and MRI poorly correlated with the clinical symptoms of AKP or the duration of the symptoms before arthroscopy. In a different study, only 60 % of the patients with clinically diagnosed anterior knee pain with retropatellar crepitus had articular cartilage lesions of the patellae [16].
Patellar instability and dislocation
Patellar instability is usually secondary to a morphologic abnormality in patellofemoral joint, which leads to recurrent patellar dislocations. Patellar dislocation occurs when the patella is completely displaced from the femoral trochlea so that there is no longer any articular surface apposition. It may occur as a result of either direct trauma or twisting injury in a patient with normal patellar alignment, or it may occur in the patient with a preexisting malalignment. Regardless of the mechanism of injury, acute articular cartilage injury is common [9]. When dislocations occur as a result of activity or direct trauma, patients may mistakenly think that the patella has dislocated or subluxed medially, when in fact they are feeling the medial femoral condyle that is normally medial relative to the patella.
The patella can be physiologically displaced slightly laterally; however, this tendency is normally balanced by two main stabilizer mechanisms: active stabilizers, which consist of the extensor muscles and orientation of the distal vastus medialis fibers, and passive stabilizers, comprised of osseous (i.e., buttress effect of the lateral femoral trochlea and deep femoral sulcus) and ligamentous structures (i.e., medial patellofemoral retinaculum and ligament) [9, 17].
Some predisposing bony abnormalities for patellar instability are trochlear dysplasia, trochlear facet asymmetry, lateralization of the tibial tuberosity, and femorotibial malrotation. Soft tissue abnormalities that may predispose individuals to patellar instability include patella alta, abnormal medial stabilizers, tight lateral retinaculum, and syndromes leading to generalized ligamentous laxity such as Ehler–Danlos, Marfan, and Down syndromes [9, 18].
Imaging is commonly obtained after the patella has relocated (Fig. 5). Therefore, the initial radiograph may be unremarkable, but the trauma of dislocation generally leaves some residual lateral placement of the patella, either as an indication of baseline malalignment or as a result of medial retinacular disruption. This is noted as lateral patellar subluxation or lateral patellar tilt on axial images. Subluxation is defined as partial lateral dislocation of the patella from the femoral groove and is usually evaluated subjectively. Patellar tilt is diagnosed by determining the lateral patellofemoral angle, which is calculated from lines drawn along the lateral joint surface patella and along the anterior aspect of the condyles [19]. A patellofemoral angle opening laterally is considered normal. An angle opening medially indicates patellar tilt.
As a result of the impaction forces, bone contusions along the medial facet of the patella and the lateral aspect of the lateral femoral condyle are common, with or without an impaction fracture line (Figs. 6, 7). The bone contusions may be associated with osteochondral injuries involving the articular cartilage with or without involvement of the subchondral bone plate [9, 20]. The osteochondral injury may be stable, unstable, or displaced; therefore a loose body is always looked for on MRI examinations after patellar dislocation. In addition to showing the bony and cartilaginous injuries, MRI would reveal the associated tearing of the medial patellar retinaculum (Figs. 5, 6), and commonly hemarthrosis [21, 22]. MRI can also show predisposing malalignment of the extensor mechanism as patella alta or a defect in medial border of patella (Fig. 8) [9, 23]. In cases of old patellar dislocation, X-rays may show soft tissue calcification in the traumatized medial patellofemoral ligament.
Femoral trochlear dysplasia
The femoral trochlear groove provides a mechanical restraint that helps to stabilize and serve as a guide for the patella as it articulates during joint flexion. The normal femoral trochlear shape has a deep sulcus with well-defined medial and lateral facets that are either equal in size or has a mildly larger lateral facet [24]. Trochlear dysplasia or a shallow trochlea is quantified as a maximum trochlear depth of 3 mm or less measured 3 cm above the femorotibial joint space [25, 26]. Trochlear dysplasia has been identified as one of the main factors contributing to chronic patellofemoral instability [27]. Dejour et al. proposed a classification distinguishing four morphologic types of trochlear dysplasia [28]. In type A, the normal shape of the trochlea is preserved but the trochlear groove is shallow (Fig. 9); in type B, the trochlea is markedly flattened or even convex with loss of the trochlear groove and facet anatomy resulting in a horizontally oriented flattened joint surface (Fig. 10); in type C, asymmetric trochlear facets are noted, with the lateral facet being too high and the medial facet being hypoplastic, resulting in an obliquely oriented flattened joint surface. In type D, in addition to the features of type C, a vertical link between medial and lateral facets leading to small bony bump is present on sagittal images.
Patella alta (PA)
PA, or high-riding patella, is an abnormal superior location of the patella relative to the trochlear fossa due to an effectively lengthened patellar tendon [29]. In PA, the patella engages the trochlea with higher degrees of flexion, which in turn leads to reduced patellar contact area and decreased bone stability with more shallow degrees of flexion [23, 30]. In the presence of genu varus deformity, a PA configuration can be accentuated by shortening the distance between the quadriceps myotendinous junction and the tibial tuberosity [23]. This configuration may predispose to lateral patellar subluxation or dislocation. Patellar and quadriceps tendonitis and Osgood-Schlatter disease are also associated with PA [31].
PA is a normal anatomic variant and most commonly causes no symptoms [32]. However, it is still an important finding, as it may increase the risk of patellar dislocation.
The most widely accepted method of evaluating patellar height is the Insall–Salvati index, which is calculated as the length of the patellar tendon measured posteriorly from the apex of the patella to its attachment to the tibial tuberosity, divided by the longest superoinferior diameter of the patella [33] (Fig. 11). Patella alta is defined as a patellar height ratio of more than 1.3 (normal is 0.8 to 1.1) [23, 30].
Patella baja (PB) or infera
PB, or a low-riding patella, refers to an abnormal inferior location of the patella relative to the femoral trochlea. As a consequence, the patella remains engaged within the trochlear groove in full knee extension. It may rarely occur spontaneously in otherwise normal children [9]; however, it can also be seen in achondroplasia, neurological disorders, as a sequela of prior trauma, or as a complication of previous knee surgery such as harvesting of the patellar tendon for an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [34, 35]. It has been associated with Osgood Schlatter disease; however, it is unclear whether the association is cause or effect [36].
PB may be associated with restricted range of motion, crepitation, and retropatellar pain. It is defined as Insall–Salvati index less than 0.8 (Fig. 12) [9, 32]. Variants in patellar morphology and previous patellar surgery may affect the ratio, therefore, it is important to note the patient’s symptoms before coming to a definitive diagnosis [37].
Bipartite patella
Bipartite patella represents failure of the fusion of the secondary ossification centers of the patella. They have been classified by Saupe into three types [38]. The first type involves the inferior pole of the patella, the second type involves the lateral margin of the patella, and the third type, the most common type, involves the superolateral pole. Patients with bipartite patella are generally asymptomatic [39]. Rarely, patients with bipartite patella may become symptomatic, complaining of anterior knee pain worse with squatting and climbing stairs with localized tenderness over the patella on exam.
A radiograph shows a well-corticated non-united fragment, commonly along the superolateral pole of the patella (Fig. 13). On MRI, asymptomatic bipartite patella is characterized by intact but thinned articular cartilage along the border between the patella and the fragment, fluid between the cleft, and a lack of any bone marrow edema or high signal within the patella or its fragment (Fig. 14) [40].
Symptomatic bipartite patella has been associated with the presence of bone marrow edema in the bipartite fragment. In a study by Kavanagh et al., bone marrow edema within the bipartite fragment was the sole finding in 49 % of the patient with bipartite patella and knee pain [41]. A symptomatic bipartite patella may be treated with surgical excision or lateral retinacular release [42].
Patellar tendinitis (PT) or Jumper’s knee
PT is one of the most common tendon abnormalities in athletes, particularly in jumping athletes such as basketball and volleyball players. It is well established that the mechanism of disease in PT is that of degenerative tendinopathy rather than an inflammatory tendinitis, as absence of inflammatory cells has been shown in analyzed tissue samples excised from the patellar tendons of patients with acute symptoms [43, 44].
Clinical symptoms may include pain, perceived swelling or fullness, and a sensation of “weakness” or “giving way”. It may result in partial or full-thickness tears with and without avulsion of the patellar apex in more advanced cases. PT may be classified into four clinical stages of injury ranging from the presence of pain after activity without functional impairment to complete tendon rupture [45, 46].
Radiographs may be unremarkable in the more acute phase or occasionally demonstrate localized calcification in the region of the patellar tendon or rarely intrasubstance calcification or ossification [47].
On MR imaging, the normal patellar tendon demonstrates homogenous low signal intensity, should not exceed 7 mm in anteroposterior (AP) diameter, may have a convex anterior border, and should always have a well-defined posterior border [44, 48]. MR features of PT include focal thickening of the proximal one-third of the tendon, an AP diameter greater than 7 mm, and focal T2 hyperintensity within the proximal tendon, most commonly involving the medial one-third of the tendon [44, 48], but may extend to involve the central third of the tendon. Other imaging findings include an indistinct posterior tendon border and edema in the adjacent Hoffa’s fat pad. The degenerative changes of the tendon, if allowed to progress, may cause full-thickness tearing of the tendon (Fig. 15).
Patellar tendon tear
Patellar tendon tears are less common than disruption of the QT as a cause of extensor mechanism dysfunction [49]. The major predisposing factors include chronic microtrauma and tendinopathy (e.g., Jumper’s knee), prior interventions such as after tendon graft harvest for ACL repair or steroid injection, and systemic diseases such as chronic renal failure, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis [10, 50]. The most common site of tendon rupture is at the tendo-osseous junction at the patellar apex followed by its insertion upon the tibia [49, 51].
Patellar tendon tears are more common in athletes who are exposed to repetitive violent contraction of the quadriceps musculature, such as basketball or volleyball players. Patellar tendon rupture can be the end stage of “Jumper’s knee” due to the cumulative effect of repetitive trauma and microtearing of the tendinous fibers (Fig. 15) [50, 52, 53]. Clinically, patients present with anterior knee pain, swelling, and a mobile patella with loss of extensor function.
On radiographs, complete rupture can manifest as significant patella alta. An avulsion fracture may be present.
MR imaging demonstrates a discontinuity of the patellar tendon and increased T2 signal intensity due to hemorrhage and edema, which can result in blurring of the posterior margin of the patellar tendon extending to the region of Hoffa’s fat pad (Fig. 16) [50].
Quadriceps tendon (QT) tear
QT tear is the second most common injury to the extensor mechanism after patellar fracture [49]. It occurs most commonly at the tendo-osseous junction at the patellar base [49, 54]. Other potential areas of injury may include the muscle belly, musculotendinous junction, or the tendon itself.
Most patients are in their 6th or 7th decades of life and have predisposing conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, that contribute to the injury [50].
Tendon tears can be partial or full thickness. Clinically, partial-thickness tears may be more difficult to diagnose as extensor function may be intact [50, 55]. The quadriceps femoris consists of three layers, which if visible on sagittal images, are the rectus femoris, combined vastus lateralis and medialis, and vastus intermedius tendons [47]. Discontinuity within any of the layers is consistent with a partial tear, while transection of all layers is consistent with a complete tear [50].
Radiographs may demonstrate patella baja with a complete tendon tear, an avulsed fragment arising from the superior patella, suprapatellar soft tissue swelling, and calcification in QT.
On MR imaging, hematoma and surrounding edema at the site of injury manifests as an area of increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Partial tendon tearing may be best appreciated on axial fluid-sensitive sequences. In a complete tendon tear, important points to note in the report include the distance between the torn tendon edges, characteristics of the torn tendon edges, and presence of hematoma, as these findings may affect surgical planning (Fig. 17) [47].
Osgood–Schlatter disease (OSD)
OSD was first described over 100 years ago [56], yet different etiologies have been postulated in the literature such as osseous avulsions involving portions of the tibial tuberosity secondary to forceful contraction of the extensor mechanism, or insult to the distal patellar tendon at its insertion up on the tibial tubercle with more emphasis on the soft-tissue aspect of the disease [57]. The most popular etiology is suspected to be a chronic avulsion injury related to repetitive microtrauma and traction on the tibial tubercle by the patellar tendon [58], hence it is considered traction apophysitis [59].
OSD is most common among adolescent male athletes in sports that require jumping and kicking. It is bilateral in up to 50 % of cases [60]. Patients clinically present with pain and swelling over the tibial tuberosity that is aggravated by exercise.
In patients with active OSD, knee radiographs can be normal or may demonstrate osseous fragmentation of the tibial tubercle, soft tissue swelling, and obliteration of the inferior angle of the Hoffa’s fat pad [60]. If the tibial surface is not yet ossified, radiography may not reveal any abnormalities [47].
MRI may reveal enlargement of the patellar tendon with increased signal intensity at its distal insertion on both T1- and T2-weighted images denoting tendinosis or tendinitis (Fig. 18), a fluid distended deep infrapatellar bursa (Fig. 19), edema of the surrounding soft tissue, and bone marrow edema subjacent to the tibial tubercle [61].
In its chronic form, OSD may leave an ossicle under the distal patellar tendon adjacent to the tibial tuberosity or a prominent tibial tubercle, known as the unresolved Osgood–Schlatter lesion (Fig. 20) [62]. These may lead to pain and disability, due to recurring injuries or athletic exercises. Knee radiographs show a non-fused corticated ossicle adjacent to the tibial tuberosity or a prominent tuberosity without significant soft tissue swelling. MRI shows the ossicle along the distal patellar tendon or prominence of the bony tuberosity without the soft tissue edema. Infrapatellar bursitis or bone marrow edema can be seen in active OSD. Slight residual thickening of the distal patellar tendon may be seen in chronic cases. When symptomatic, the unresolved Osgood–Schlatter lesion may be treated with resection of the ossicle and adjacent bursa or scar tissue [63].
Sinding–Larsen–Johansson syndrome (SLJ)
SLJ is traction apophysitis of the inferior patellar pole [59], which represents a chronic traction injury of the immature tendo-osseous junction and has been considered as an equivalent to jumper’s knee in a pediatric setting by some authors [64]. The etiology is believed to be related to forceful contraction of the QT against resistance [60]. SLJ is seen in athletes typically between 10–14 years of age [65]. Patients may present with pain at the inferior pole of the patella associated with swelling.
Radiographs may reveal patella alta and tiny osseous fragments adjacent to the inferior pole of the patella [60]. Although it may be difficult to distinguish SLJ from patellar sleeve avulsions on radiographs, the latter typically involves an injury to spherical growth plate at the patellar apex in the pediatric population; however, small osseous fragments are usually present in both conditions [57].
MRI demonstrates an osseous avulsion injury at the proximal patellar tendon insertion without extensive cartilaginous injury, thereby differentiating SLJ from a patellar sleeve avulsion (Fig. 21) [60]. It is important to distinguish between the two entities as they may require different treatment strategies, with conservative management for SLJ versus possible internal fixation for displaced patellar sleeve avulsion fractures [57]. MRI in the acute phase also shows thickening and edema of the patellar tendon along the inferior pole of the patella and adjacent soft tissue edema. In the chronic healed phase of SLJ, an ossific protuberance from the inferior pole of the patella may be present.
Anterior knee bursitis
There are 12 named bursae about the knee, out of which four bursae are more susceptible to inflammation: the prepatellar, superficial, deep infrapatellar, and pes anserine bursae [10]. Trauma, infection, overuse, and hemorrhage may result in inflammation of a bursa [66].
Prepatellar bursitis (PPB) or housemaid’s knee
The prepatellar bursa is located between the patella and overlying subcutaneous tissue. Inflammation or hemorrhagic bursitis can occur as a result of acute injury, such as falling directly onto the patella, or from recurrent minor injuries in the form of prolonged or repetitive microtrauma [67]. Pyogenic PPB is also common, especially in children [10]. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly isolated organism. Clinically, patients may present with pain and swelling over the patella.
Radiographs may appear normal or may demonstrate thickening of the prepatellar soft tissues. In chronic cases, calcification may be seen in the region of the prepatellar soft tissues.
On MR imaging, PPB appears as an oval-shaped fluid signal intensity collection between the subcutaneous tissue and the patella (Fig. 22), which may reflect either an effusion and/or hematoma (Fig. 23). The effusion and edema may extend and communicate with the superficial infrapatellar bursa or pretibial bursa [47].
Infrapatellar bursitis (IPB)
There are both superficial and deep infrapatellar bursae. The superficial infrapatellar bursa is located between the tibial tubercle and the overlying skin, whereas the deep infrapatellar bursa is between the posterior aspect of the patellar tendon and the anterior aspect of the proximal tibia [68].
Superficial IPB, also known as “clergyman’s knee”, is due to inflammation and fluid accumulation resulting from chronic stress. It may be part of an overuse spectrum as seen in jumpers and runners [47]. The inflamed bursa may communicate with the prepatellar bursa superiorly and with the pretibial bursa inferiorly [47]. IPB-related symptoms are remarkably similar to those of patellofemoral arthralgia [9]. Soft tissue swelling inferior to the patella may be palpable on physical examination.
On radiographs, soft tissue thickening or a large collection presenting as a soft tissue density/mass may be seen.
On MRI, superficial IPB presents as a loculated, exophytic collection anterior to the distal patellar tendon. Contrary to pretibial subcutaneous edema, bursitis appears as a localized collection with well-defined borders [67]. Deep IPB appears as a triangular fluid collection posterior to the inferior patellar tendon (Fig. 24). When deep IPB presents in younger patients, it can be differentiated from Osgood–Schlatter disease by the lack of a thickened and increased intrasubstance T2 hyperintensity in the patellar tendon [69].
Pes anserine bursa
The pes anserine bursa is located along the medial aspect of the proximal tibia separating the pes anserine tendons (the distal sartorius, gracilis, and semitendinosus tendons) from the tibial insertion of the medial collateral ligament and the bony surface of the medial tibial condyle [70]. Pes anserine bursitis may occur as a result of overuse, especially in runners, or following medial collateral ligament injury [47, 71]. The patient may complain of medial knee pain isolated below joint line.
On MR imaging, pes anserine bursitis classically appears as an oblong, multiloculated fluid collection at the medial aspect of the proximal tibia subjacent to the pes anserine tendons, best appreciated on T2-weighted axial images (Fig. 25). It is important to differentiate pes anserine bursitis from semimembranosus bursitis and a popliteal cyst, the latter two entities are typically located more posteriorly, and the neck of popliteal cysts classically originates between the medial head of the gastrocnemius and semitendinosus tendons [67].
Mediopatellar plica syndrome (MPS)
A plica is a normal synovial fold found in the lining of a joint that sometimes becomes symptomatic [72]. The most commonly encountered plicae of the knee are the infrapatellar, suprapatellar, and mediopatellar plica [73].
Direct trauma, repetitive sports activities, or other pathologic knee conditions may result in chronic inflammation and a thickened fibrotic plica, which in turn can irritate the synovium at the condylar margin with motion of the knee and lead to synovitis and articular cartilage loss [72].
The mediopatellar plica is the most likely plica to cause symptoms when it becomes inflamed, thickened, and fibrotic [74]. The mediopatellar plica originates from the medial aspect of the joint capsule, inserts into the synovium, and covers the infrapatellar fat pad [72] with a cranio-caudal course along the medial aspect of the joint. MPS can cause anterior knee pain particularly in the medial infrapatellar region [75, 76] that may be associated with a palpable tender band in the medial peripatellar area [9].
On MR imaging, the normal plica has low signal on both T1- and T2-weighted images and is easily identified with some degree of joint distention. Increased T2 signal intensity may be seen in symptomatic plica. When the articular fluid is not enough to delineate the plica, MR arthrography is a useful technique to better delineate the plica [72]. Mediopatellar plica has been classified into four types, types A through D, on the basis of size and the extent of coverage over the anterior surface of the medial femoral condyle [77]. Types C and D can be trapped between the medial condyle and the patella, become thickened, and even cause chondral damage (Fig. 26) [72].
Infrapatellar and suprapatellar fat pad
The infrapatellar (Hoffa’s) fat pad is an intracapsular-extrasynovial structure, bordered by the inferior pole of the patella superiorly, the joint capsule and patellar tendon anteriorly, the proximal tibia and deep infrapatellar bursa inferiorly, and the joint cavity posteriorly. It has an attachment with the anterior horns of the menisci inferiorly and to the periosteum of the tibia [78, 79].
Hoffa’s disease, also known as infrapatellar fat pad impingement syndrome [80], is secondary to trauma or joint space narrowing [78], with overuse as the most likely mechanism. Initially, the repetitive microtrauma causes hemorrhage in the fat pad [80, 81], with chronic mechanical irritation either between the patellar tendon and lateral femoral condyle or the lateral aspect of Hoffa’s fat pad and lateral femoral condyle. Hoffa’s disease also has high association with patellar maltracking or malalignment including patella alta and lateral subluxation of the patella [82]. Diffuse edema of Hoffa’s fat pad has also been associated with HIV [83].
Symptoms of anterior knee pain are generally accompanied by tenderness and induration of the infrapatellar region [9]. On MR images, an ill-defined area of T2 hyperintensity is present at the inferolateral aspect of the patellofemoral joint and the lateral portion of the Hoffa’s fat pad. In other cases, the edema may involve the entire fat pad (Fig. 27). With chronic disease, hypointense T2 signal intensity may be present secondary to fibrosis and hemosiderin deposition [47]. Other associated findings include lateral patellar subluxation and patella alta [82].
The suprapatellar fat pad lies posterior to the quadriceps tendon insertion on the patellar base and anterior to the suprapatellar recess, which separates it from prefemoral fat pad. Suprapatellar fat pad edema and enlargement might result from repetitive microtrauma or overuse injury with resultant hemorrhage and inflammation [84]. On MR, the convex appearance of the posterior border of the suprapatellar fat pad has been suggested as a criterion for its edematous enlargement (Fig. 28) [84], however its association with anterior knee pain is controversial [85, 86].
Conclusions
AKP is the most common complaint of the knee joint, which can be secondary to a variety of etiologies. We have reviewed several of the most common causes of AKP, falling into seven broad categories of diseases including chondral abnormalities, patellar instability and dislocation, bipartite patella, abnormal patellar location, various tendinopathies, bursal inflammation, chronic traction avulsion injuries in pediatric and adolescent patients, and miscellaneous diseases including MPS and Hoffa’s disease. An improved understanding of AKP with an increased awareness of the common abnormalities and their appearance, particularly on MR imaging, allows for a more accurate diagnosis, which may facilitate improved treatment and pre-operative planning.
References
Collado H, Fredericson M. Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin Sports Med. 2010;29:379–98.
Devereaux MD, Lachmann SM. Patello-femoral arthralgia in athletes attending a sports injury clinic. Br J Sports Med. 1984;18:18–21.
Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, Cambier D, Vanderstraeten G. Intrinsic risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in an athletic population. A two-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:480–9.
Biedert RM, Sanchis-Alfonso V. Sources of anterior knee pain. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21:335–47. vii.
Patellofemoral semantics. The Tower of Babel. The International Patellofemoral Study Group. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10:92–5.
Budinger K. Uber traumatische Knorpelrisse im Kniegelenk. Dtsch Z Chir. 1908;92:510–36.
Grelsamer RP. Patellar nomenclature: the Tower of Babel revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:60–5.
Seedholm BB, Takeda T, Tsubuku M, Wright V. Mechanical factors and patellofemoral osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38:307–16.
Fulkerson JP. Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop. 2004;177:176–81.
Clifford R. Wheeless III, MD, James A. Nunley, II, MD, James R. Urbaniak M. Wheeless’ Textbook of Orthopedics Online. 2013.
Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology. 1996;198:209–12.
Ouerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Jt Surg. 1961;43-B:752–7.
McCauley TR, Kier R, Lynch KJ, Jokl P. Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:101–5.
Lee SH, Suh JS, Cho J, Kim SJ. Evaluation of chondromalacia of the patella with axial inversion recovery-fast spin-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:412–6.
Mattila VM, Weckström M, Leppänen V, Kiuru M, Pihlajamäki H. Sensitivity of MRI for articular cartilage lesions of the patellae. Scand J Surg SJS. 2012;101:56–61.
Leslie IJ, Bentley G. Arthroscopy in the diagnosis of chondromalacia patellae. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37:540–7.
Vainionpää S, Laasonen E, Pätiälä H, Rusanen M, Rokkannen P. Acute dislocation of the patella. Clinical, radiographic and operative findings in 64 consecutive cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57:331–3.
Dugdale TW, Renshaw TS. Instability of the patellofemoral joint in Down syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg. 1986;68:405–13.
Laurin CA, Lévesque HP, Dussault R, Labelle H, Peides JP. The abnormal lateral patellofemoral angle: a diagnostic roentgenographic sign of recurrent patellar subluxation. J Bone Jt Surg. 1978;60:55–60.
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Silva P, Davis DK, Elias DA, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1114–21.
Lance E, Deutsch AL, Mink JH. Prior lateral patellar dislocation: MR imaging findings. Radiology. 1993;189:905–7.
Virolainen H, Visuri T, Kuusela T. Acute dislocation of the patella: MR findings. Radiology. 1993;189:243–6.
Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S. MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics. 2010;30:961–81.
Ficat P, Hungerford D. Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. 1st ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1977.
Brattstrom H. Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of patella. Acta Orthop Scand. 1964;68 SUPPL 68:1–148.
Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J. Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology. 2000;216:858–64.
Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2:19–26.
Dejour H, Walch G, Neyret P, Adeleine P. Dysplasia of the femoral trochlea. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1990;76:45–54.
Neyret P, Robinson AHN, Le Coultre B, Lapra C, Chambat P. Patellar tendon length–the factor in patellar instability? Knee. 2002;9:3–6.
Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM. Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Jt Surg. 2007;89:1749–55.
Aparicio G, Abril JC, Calvo E, Alvarez L. Radiologic study of patellar height in Osgood-Schlatter disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:63–6.
Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Parker L. MRI criteria for patella alta and baja. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:445–50.
Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101:101–4.
Noyes FR, Wojtys EM, Marshall MT. The early diagnosis and treatment of developmental patella infera syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;265:241–52.
Tria AJ, Alicea JA, Cody RP. Patella baja in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:229–34.
Lancourt JE, Cristini JA. Patella alta and patella infera. Their etiological role in patellar dislocation, chondromalacia, and apophysitis of the tibial tubercle. J Bone Jt Surg. 1975;57:1112–5.
Weale AE, Murray DW, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE. The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg. 1999;81:790–5.
Saupe H. Primare knochenmark seilerung der kniescheibe. Dtsch Z Chir. 1943;258:386.
Carney J, Thompson D, O’Daniel J, Cassidy J. Arthroscopic excision of a painful bipartite patella fragment. Am J Orthop. 2010;39:40–3.
O’Brien J, Murphy C, Halpenny D, McNeill G, Torreggiani WC. Magnetic resonance imaging features of asymptomatic bipartite patella. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:425–9.
Kavanagh EC, Zoga A, Omar I, Ford S, Schweitzer M, Eustace S. MRI findings in bipartite patella. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:209–14.
Atesok K, Doral MN, Lowe J, Finsterbush A. Symptomatic bipartite patella: treatment alternatives. J Am Acad Orthop Surgerons. 2008;16:455–61.
Benjamin M, Toumi H, Ralphs JR, Bydder G, Best TM, Milz S. Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load. J Anat. 2006;208:471–90.
Yu JS, Popp JE, Kaeding CC, Lucas J. Correlation of MR imaging and pathologic findings in athletes undergoing surgery for chronic patellar tendinitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:115–8.
Blazina ME, Kerlan RK, Jobe FW, Carter VS, Carlson GJ. Jumper’s knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4:665–78.
Roels J, Martens M, Mulier JC, Burssens A. Patellar tendinitis (jumper’s knee). Am J Sports Med. 1978;6:362–8.
Niitsu M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2013.
el-Khoury GY, Wira RL, Berbaum KS, Pope TL, Monu JU. MR imaging of patellar tendinitis. Radiology. 1992;184:849–54.
Nance EP, Kaye JJ. Injuries of the quadriceps mechanism. Radiology. 1982;142:301–7.
Yu JS, Petersilge C, Sartoris DJ, Pathria MN, Resnick D. MR imaging of injuries of the extensor mechanism of the knee. Radiographics. 1994;14:541–51.
Ramsey RH, Muller GE. Quadriceps tendon rupture: a diagnostic trap. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;70:161–4.
Kelly DW, Carter VS, Jobe FW, Kerlan RK. Patellar and quadriceps tendon ruptures–jumper’s knee. Am J Sports Med. 1984;12:375–80.
Scranton PE, Farrar EL. Mucoid degeneration of the patellar ligament in athletes. J Bone Jt Surg. 1992;74:435–7.
Evans EJ, Benjamin M, Pemberton DJ. Variations in the amount of calcified tissue at the attachments of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in man. J Anat. 1991;174:145–51.
Siwek CW, Rao JP. Ruptures of the extensor mechanism of the knee joint. J Bone Jt Surg. 1981;63:932–7.
Osgood RB. Lesions of the tibial tubercle occurring during adolescence. Bost Med Surg J. 1903:114–7.
Bates DG, Hresko MT, Jaramillo D. Patellar sleeve fracture: demonstration with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;193:825–7.
Stevens MA, El-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Brandser EA, Chow S. Imaging features of avulsion injuries. Radiographics. 1999;19:655–72.
Arnaiz J, Piedra T, de Lucas EM, Arnaiz AM, Pelaz M, Gomez-Dermit V, et al. Imaging findings of lower limb apophysitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W316–25.
Gottsegen CJ, Eyer BA, White EA, Learch TJ, Forrester D. Avulsion fractures of the knee: imaging findings and clinical significance. Radiographics. 2008;28:1755–70.
Rosenberg ZS, Kawelblum M, Cheung YY, Beltran J, Lehman WB, Grant AD. Osgood-Schlatter lesion: fracture or tendinitis? Scintigraphic, CT, and MR imaging features. Radiology. 1992;185:853–8.
Orava S, Malinen L, Karpakka J, Kvist M, Leppilahti J, Rantanen J, et al. Results of surgical treatment of unresolved Osgood-Schlatter lesion. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2000;89:298–302.
Mital MA, Matza RA, Cohen J. The so-called unresolved Osgood-Schlatter lesion: a concept based on fifteen surgically treated lesions. J Bone Jt Surg. 1980;62:732–9.
Dupuis CS, Westra SJ, Makris J, Wallace EC. Injuries and conditions of the extensor mechanism of the pediatric knee. Radiographics. 2009;29:877–86.
Carr JC, Hanly S, Griffin J, Gibney R. Sonography of the patellar tendon and adjacent structures in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1535–9.
Hirji Z, Hunjun JS, Choudur HN. Imaging of the bursae. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2011;1:22.
Chatra PS. Bursae around the knee joints. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012;22:27–30.
Lee P, Hunter TB, Taljanovic M. Musculoskeletal colloquialisms: how did we come up with these names? Radiographics. 2004;24:1009–27.
Gholve PA, Scher DM, Khakharia S, Widmann RF, Green DW. Osgood Schlatter syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19:44–50.
Rennie WJ, Saifuddin A. Pes anserine bursitis: incidence in symptomatic knees and clinical presentation. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:395–8.
McCarthy CL, McNally EG. The MRI appearance of cystic lesions around the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:187–209.
García-Valtuille R, Abascal F, Cerezal L, García-Valtuille A, Pereda T, Canga A, et al. Anatomy and MR imaging appearances of synovial plicae of the knee. Radiographics. 2002;22:775–84.
Boles CA, Martin DF. Synovial plicae in the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:221–7.
Jee WH, Choe BY, Kim JM, Song HH, Choi KH. The plica syndrome: diagnostic value of MRI with arthroscopic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:814–8.
Broom MJ, Fulkerson JP. The plica syndrome: a new perspective. Orthop Clin North Am. 1986;17:279–81.
Patel D. Arthroscopy of the plicae–synovial folds and their significance. Am J Sports Med. 1978;6:217–25.
Sakakibara J, Watanabe M. Arthroscopic study on Iino’s band (plica synovialis mediopatellaris). J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1976;50:513–22.
Jacobson JA, Lenchik L, Ruhoy MK, Schweitzer ME, Resnick D. MR imaging of the infrapatellar fat pad of Hoffa. Radiographics. 1997;17:675–91.
Saddik D, McNally EG, Richardson M. MRI of Hoffa’s fat pad. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:433–44.
Hoffa A. The influence of the adipose tissue with regards to the pathology of the knee joint. JAMA 1904;43:795–6.
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Giddens J. Hoffa’s disease: arthroscopic resection of the infrapatellar fat pad. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:184–7.
Chung CB, Skaf A, Roger B, Campos J, Stump X, Resnick D. Patellar tendon-lateral femoral condyle friction syndrome: MR imaging in 42 patients. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:694–7.
Torshizy H, Pathria MN, Chung CB. Inflammation of Hoffa’s fat pad in the setting of HIV: magnetic resonance imaging findings in six patients. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:35–40.
Tsavalas N, Karantanas AH. Suprapatellar fat-pad mass effect: MRI findings and correlation with anterior knee pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:W291–6.
Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB. Quadriceps fat pad edema: significance on magnetic resonance images of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:269–74.
Roth C, Jacobson J, Jamadar D, Caoili E, Morag Y, Housner J. Quadriceps fat pad signal intensity and enlargement on MRI: prevalence and associated findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1383–7.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Disclosure
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samim, M., Smitaman, E., Lawrence, D. et al. MRI of anterior knee pain. Skeletal Radiol 43, 875–893 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1816-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1816-7