Introduction

In natural and engineered environments, microorganisms often co-exist and, in many cases, interact with solid minerals (Fig. 1). The interaction of microorganisms with solid minerals in subsurface environments is generally considered a key factor in shaping and altering the physicochemical characteristics of the minerals (Gadd 2010). Indigenous microbial communities associated with rocks, such as granite and black shale, have been found to be involved in the bioweathering of the minerals present in these rocks (Frey et al. 2010; Gleeson et al. 2005, 2006; Matlakowska et al. 2010, 2012). Certain microorganisms interact with minerals to scavenge essential elements, which have low bioavailability (Ehrlich 1996). Consequently, microorganism-mineral interactions in natural ecosystems contribute significantly to environmental processes including biogeochemical cycling and metal/mineral transformations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Ubiquitous presence of microorganism-mineral interactions in natural and built environments. Microbial biofilms can form at solid-air or solid-liquid interfaces. Biofilms on buildings, monuments and pipes cause discolouration and corrosion, which result in deterioration of these structures. In natural environments such as lakes, microorganism-mineral interactions on sediment, pebbles and rock are vital for biogeochemical cycling such as carbon and iron cycling

Microorganisms also play an active role in the deterioration of engineered materials, such as concrete in anthropogenic environments (Bertron 2014). The interaction of microorganisms with solid minerals is a major contributor to the deterioration of cultural heritage sites. Colonization of bacteria, fungi and cyanobacteria on stones may cause discolouration and mineral dissolution, resulting in the deterioration of monuments and frescoes (Cappitelli et al. 2007, 2009; Crispim and Gaylarde 2005; Fernandes 2006). Similarly, certain microorganisms promote corrosion and damage building materials, such as concrete (Bertron 2014), which compromises the integrity of important infrastructures, such as sewer pipes (Santo Domingo et al. 2011). On the other hand, microorganism-mineral interactions can be exploited in biotechnological applications, including anaerobic digestion, bioelectrochemical applications, metal recovery, repair of building materials and pH control. The interaction of microorganisms and minerals in natural and engineered environments has emerged as an exciting field of research that allows us to better understand environmental bioprocesses and to develop novel biotechnological applications.

In this mini-review, we provide a summary of the different mechanisms involved in microorganism-mineral interactions. In addition, we also highlight recent developments in biotechnological applications of microorganism-mineral interactions.

Microorganism-mineral interactions

Biofilm formation on solid minerals

Mineral surfaces provide a stable environment for the attachment and development of surface-associated microbial communities encased by an extracellular matrix comprising extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), known as biofilms (Costerton et al. 1995; Ding et al. 2014; Papida et al. 2000). Biofilms on solid minerals often form at the solid-air (subaerial biofilms) or solid-liquid (subaquatic biofilms) interfaces (Gorbushina 2007; Jenkinson and Lappin-Scott 2001; Spiers et al. 2003). Examples are subaerial biofilms on natural rocks and man-made stone monuments (Gorbushina 2007; Polo et al. 2012). Similarly, the majority of minerals, soil aggregates and sediment-water interfaces in aquatic environments are colonized by epilithic subaquatic biofilms (Gorbushina 2007; Lünsdorf et al. 2000). Subaquatic biofilms play important roles in carbon cycling and contribute significantly to primary production in oligotrophic lakes (Bartrons et al. 2012). The surface of solid minerals may provide microorganisms in biofilms with a favourable environment, facilitating extraction of inorganic nutrients directly from the mineral (Warren 2005).

Microbial biofilms on solid minerals often contain bacteria, fungi and algae. Table 1 shows various microbial communities that have been identified on minerals in natural and man-made environments. Airborne microorganisms may settle and colonize the exposed mineral surfaces to form biofilms at the solid-air interfaces (Abrusci et al. 2005; Borrego et al. 2010). Although chemolithotrophic, chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic microorganisms can be found in subaerial biofilms, chemoorganotrophs that trap minerals and organic substances from the air are often the first to colonize exposed surfaces (Viles and Gorbushina 2003). In addition, algae have been reported to be associated with green subaerial patinas on monuments, while black fungi have been shown to be the dominant microorganisms in black patinas (Polo et al. 2012). Subaquatic biofilms consist of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms with cyanobacteria and algae as being important taxa (Bartrons et al. 2012; Lyautey et al. 2005).

Table 1 A summary of some microbial communities on minerals in natural and engineered environments

Surface adhesion is the initial step in biofilm formation (Hori and Matsumoto 2010). The attachment of microbial biofilms to mineral surfaces is mediated by an EPS matrix, which consists of extracellular polymers and high molecular weight cell surface compounds secreted by the microorganisms (Welch et al. 1999). The EPS protects the cells from mechanical damage and plays fundamental roles in the interactions of microorganisms with mineral surfaces (Tuson and Weibel 2013). High-molecular weight acidic polysaccharides in EPS increase mineral weathering by chelating metal ions derived from minerals as well as providing protons, which react with the mineral surface, resulting in proton-promoted dissolution (Welch et al. 1999). Batch reactor experiments demonstrated that Al and Si release to the bulk solution from feldspar dissolution under acidic conditions (pH 4.0) was enhanced up to 100-fold in the presence of commonly produced microbial acidic polysaccharides, such as gum xanthan, pectin, low-, medium- and high-molecular weight alginates (Welch et al. 1999). Similarly, biofilms of cyanobacterium Nostoc punctiforme and ascomycete Knufia petricola enhanced the leaching of Ca and Mg from carbonate and silicate minerals (Seiffert et al. 2014). Biofilms of bacteria isolated from black shale enhanced the release of K, P, Cu and As from shale into the aqueous phase, which resulted in partial dissolution and changes to the shale surface, such as pitting (Matlakowska et al. 2012). Matlakowska et al. (2012) proposed that the mobilization of elements was facilitated by the production of siderophores as well as metabolites.

Biofilms also contribute to the biomechanical deterioration of solid minerals. The EPS matrix is hydrophilic and absorbs water to prevent microbial communities from drying out (Papida et al. 2000). The presence of moisture in the EPS maintains diffusion pathways and supplies microbial cells with readily available nutrients at low water potential, enabling cells to survive periods of desiccation (Chenu and Roberson 1996; Papida et al. 2000). It was shown that the diffusion of glucose in clay was significantly facilitated by EPS at low water potentials (Chenu and Roberson 1996). Thus, trapping of moisture by the EPS may help to preserve the physiological activity of the microorganisms even during desiccation events, increasing the time available for mineral hydrolysis by microbial action and contributing to the acceleration of weathering (Chenu and Roberson 1996; Ercole et al. 2007). During repeated wetting and drying cycles, water absorption by the EPS also causes expansion of the biofilm matrix, while water evaporation causes its contraction, resulting in mechanical stress, which widens fissures in minerals (Papida et al. 2000; Warscheid and Braams 2000).

Solid minerals as electron acceptors and donors for respiration

Metals in solid minerals may have important biological functions in microorganisms as terminal electron acceptors and donors for respiration (Ehrlich 1996; Gadd 2010; Karlsson et al. 2012) (Fig. 2). Insoluble minerals like oxides of iron and manganese are amongst the most abundant terminal anaerobic electron acceptors in the Earth’s subsurface environments (Richardson et al. 2013) (Fig. 2a). Mineral respiration constitutes one of the most widespread respiratory processes in anoxic zones and has significant influence on the balance of several biogeochemical cycles, such as the nitrogen, sulphur and carbon cycles (Fredrickson and Gorby 1996; Lovley et al. 2004; Nealson and Myers 1992). The reduction of metals for energy generation is coupled to the oxidation of carbon substrates, such as acetate or inorganic electron donors such as hydrogen (Fredrickson and Gorby 1996; Nealson and Myers 1992), and is the main contributor to degradation of organic matter in aquatic sediments (Lovley 1991; Thamdrup 2000). Bacteria from diverse taxonomic groups, such as Shewanella, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Arcobacter and Colwellia capable of reducing manganese and oxidizing organic carbon substrates, have been isolated from the Black Sea and manganese oxide-rich marine sediments, suggesting that these bacteria may play a pivotal role in carbon-linked Mn(IV) reduction in these anoxic environments (Nealson et al. 1991; Vandieken et al. 2012). Similarly, Fe(III) reduction is responsible for the anaerobic oxidation of organic carbon in freshwater and marine sediments (Lovley et al. 2004). In addition to manganese and iron, bacteria of the Shewanella genus have been found to be able to reduce an array of electron acceptors, such as uranium, chromium, technetium, neptunium, plutonium, selenite, tellurite and vanadate (Fredrickson et al. 2008). Microbial respiration on solid minerals increases the solubility of these minerals in the environment and accelerates mineral weathering (Gadd 2010).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Minerals function as electron acceptors and donors for respiration in microorganisms. a Metal ions (e.g. Mn4+ and Fe3+) in metal oxides are reduced during anaerobic mineral respiration. b In chemolithotrophic and photolithotrophic respiration, microorganisms obtain electrons from elements and ions (e.g. S, S2−, S2O3 2−, Fe2+)

Minerals can also function as electron donors for lithotrophic bacteria, which have been reported to oxidize a variety of inorganic substrates (e.g. sulphide, metal, ammonium, nitrite) in the generation of ATP during respiration (Tolli and King 2005). Acidophilic S and Fe oxidizing bacteria, such as Thiobacillus sp. and Acidithiobacillus sp., have been isolated from mine tailings (Baker and Banfield 2003; Wakelin et al. 2012). The oxidation of sulphide and iron by chemolithotrophic bacteria accelerates the dissolution of sulphide minerals, such as pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, marcasite and sphalerite, and significantly impacts rates of weathering (Baker and Banfield 2003). Chemolithotrophs obtain their energy from the oxidation of certain inorganic compounds, which can occur in the presence or absence of light. In contrast, photolithotrophs, such as green and purple sulphur bacteria, which oxidize elemental sulphur as well as reduced sulphur compounds (e.g. sulphides and thiosulphates), obtain their energy from sunlight (Frigaard and Dahl 2008; Imhoff 1995; Madigan and Jung 2009). Sulphur oxidizing bacteria are widely distributed in anoxic aquatic environments and are important for the cycling of sulphur as well as sulphide detoxification (Madigan and Jung 2009).

Solid minerals as reservoirs for macro and/or micronutrients

Solid minerals are also sources of macro and/or micronutrients, such as cobalt, nickel and iron (Fig. 3). Cobalt is an important co-factor of methyltransferases, while nickel is essential for the activity of several hydrogenases in methanogenic microorganisms (Karlsson et al. 2012). Iron is a macronutrient that is a key component of metalloenzymes, such as cytochromes, nitrogenases and monooxygenases (Konhauser et al. 2011). Hence, microorganisms interact with minerals to acquire these essential macro and micronutrients. Microbial metabolites including organic acids, siderophores and cyanide cause the leaching of metal ions and contribute to mineral solubilization. Carboxylic acids provide protons for protonolysis as well as metal chelating anions, while oxalic acids form oxalate complexes with metal ions (Gadd 2010; Uroz et al. 2009). Siderophores are organic ligands, which chelate and sequester iron. They are produced by a wide range of environmental microorganisms, especially under conditions with low soluble iron levels (Cabaj and Kosakowska 2009; Neilands 1995). Cyanide solubilizes metals by forming complexes with them (Frey et al. 2010). The production of these metal chelating metabolites, which facilitate metal ion acquisition, has been frequently reported in microorganisms isolated from rocks. Microorganisms isolated from black shale at the Lubin copper mine produced siderophores during growth on medium-lacking soluble iron so as to facilitate the mobilization of Fe3+ ions from added insoluble iron-containing compounds (Matlakowska and Sklodowska 2009). Likewise, a positive correlation was observed between the production of oxalate and cyanide and the iron release from granite, when bacterial isolates from a glacier forefield were cultivated in the presence of granite powder (Frey et al. 2010).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Minerals function as reservoirs for macro and/or micronutrients. Macro and micronutrients function as co-factors for enzymes and are essential for microbial function. To acquire these essential nutrients, microorganisms in biofilms produce metabolites such as organic acids, siderophores and cyanide, which cause leaching of metal ions and contribute to mineral solubilization. Some of the leached metal ions will be used by the microorganisms, while the remainder will be released into the environment

Solid minerals as electron transfer conduits facilitating intercellular interactions

Conductive or semiconductive iron oxide minerals, such as pyrite, magnetite and hematite, are abundant in soil and sediments and can function as natural electron conduits (Kato et al. 2012b). These conductors connect spatially separated biogeochemical redox processes by transferring electrons between microorganisms. Unlike large crystals, these iron oxide particles are often small enough to fit into the intercellular spaces of microbial communities in soil and sediments and form electron conduits between cells (Kato et al. 2010) (Fig. 4). Interspecies electron transfer (IET) was observed in a magnetite and hematite supplemented anaerobic co-culture of the soil bacteria Geobacter sulfurreducens and Thiobacillus denitrificans, containing acetate and nitrate as the electron donor and acceptor, respectively. IET in the hematite-supplemented culture was mostly mediated by iron redox cycles, whereas magnetite served as an electron conduit between the two bacteria (Kato et al. 2012b). IET via (semi)conductive iron oxide minerals in microbial communities can also accelerate methanogenesis (Kato et al. 2012a).

Fig. 4
figure 4

(Semi)conductive solid minerals such as hematite and magnetite can function as electron transfer conduits facilitating intercellular interactions. These conduits connect spatially separated biogeochemical redox processes by transferring electrons between microorganisms. Interspecies electron transfer (IET) via hematite and magnetite nanoparticles couple acetate oxidation to nitrate reduction and accelerate thermodynamically unfavourable reactions such as methanogenesis from acetate and ethanol

Biotechnological applications of microbe-mineral interactions

Microbe-mineral interactions have been exploited in several recent biotechnological applications, including the improvement of anaerobic digestion (AD) performance, bioelectrochemical performance, metal recovery, repair of concrete and carbonate stone and pH control (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Examples of biotechnological applications by harnessing the power of microorganism-mineral interactions in the last 10 years

Improvement of AD performance

The addition of minerals, such as metal oxides, has been shown to improve the performance of anaerobic digesters. During the AD of dairy wastewater, methane generation and organic degradation were significantly enhanced in reactors supplemented with semiconductive ferric oxyhydroxide and conductive magnetite, with the greatest improvement observed in a reactor treated with magnetite. Similarly, the degradation efficiency and methane yields of plant biomass were increased in the presence of the iron oxides goethite, hematite and magnetite. In both cases, it is likely that these iron oxides facilitated direct IET (electric syntrophy) between methanogens and electroactive iron-reducing bacteria, thus resulting in more acidogenic substrates (e.g. volatile fatty acids) for methanogenesis (Baek et al. 2015; Ma et al. 2015).

Other minerals have also been shown to improve AD. The sulphate-containing mineral gypsum promotes the growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) by enabling their decomposition of organic compounds. Mere addition of hematite or gypsum accelerated the removal of total organic carbon (TOC) from beef extract and peptone (Chen et al. 2014). Simultaneous addition of gypsum and hematite promoted both TOC degradation and formation of FeS and CaCO3. In other studies, anaerobic digestion processes of swine manure were improved by the addition of zeolite, which decreased the inhibitory effect of ammonia on methanogenesis by ammonium adsorption to the mineral particles, thus resulting in an improvement in methane production (Lin et al. 2013; Montalvo et al. 2005).

Bioelectrochemical applications

Electrochemically active bacteria are capable of exchanging electrons with extracellular (semi)conductive minerals. The bioelectrochemical interaction between bacteria and (semi)conductive minerals can be harnessed to enhance the performance of bioelectrochemical devices, such as microbial fuel cells. The performance of microbial fuel cells can be improved by the addition of (semi)conductive solid minerals to establish electrically conductive networks. For example, supplementation of an electrochemical cell containing rice paddy soil bacteria with hematite, magnetite and ferrihydrite enhanced the current density and coulombic efficiency of the culture (Kato et al. 2010). In another study, coating ruthenium oxide on the anode of a microbial fuel cell enhanced bioelectrochemical performance by 17 times, in which the mechanism remains unknown (Lv et al. 2012). For a detailed summary of conductive mineral (e.g. metal oxides) enabled high-performance bioelectrochemical devices, the audience may refer to several recently published reviews on the fundamentals and applications of bioelectrochemical systems (Ge et al. 2014; Lovley and Nevin 2013; Sun et al. 2015; Wang and Ren 2013; Yong et al. 2015).

Metal recovery

High value, critical and scarce metals as well as rare earth elements (REE) can be recovered by bioleaching from ores or electronic wastes for subsequent industrial reuse. Such metals are usually locked in sulphide and iron minerals. Several bacterial species with potential metal bioleaching capacities, such as acid and siderophore production, have been isolated from mineral ores and mining environments (Curutchet et al. 2001; Matlakowska and Sklodowska 2009). Immobilized biofilms of the acidophilic bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, which produce sulphuric acid (promoter of mineral dissolution) and Fe(III) (oxidant), have been developed for metal recovery from the dissolution of sulphide minerals. Treatment of a low-grade sulphur ore with sulphuric acid and Fe(III) produced by the bacteria resulted in the recovery of 69.7 % of copper, 39.5 % of zinc and 99.5 % of manganese after 75 days (Curutchet et al. 2001). Another acidophilic bacterium, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, has been shown to be able to leach copper from printed circuit boards, as well as cobalt and lithium from spent lithium ion batteries (Mishra et al. 2008; Yang et al. 2009).

Organic acids produced by filamentous fungi have been demonstrated to be able to leach REEs from ores, such as bauxite reside and monazite sand (Brisson et al. 2016; Qu and Lian 2013). Citric acid produced by Penicillium tricolor was shown to have the potential for recovering REEs and radionuclides from bauxite residue by the formation of soluble complexes. Leaching efficiencies ranging from 20 to 40 % were achieved (Qu and Lian 2013). Aspergillus niger and two newly isolated strains, Aspergillus terreus strain ML3-1 and Paecilomyces spp. strain WE3-F, were found to be able to use monazite as their sole phosphate source and, hence, were able to solubilize phosphate to release REEs (Brisson et al. 2016).

Microorganisms also produce metal chelating compounds, which can be used in metal recovery. Cyanogenic bacteria produce cyanide, which forms complexes with metal ions and can also be employed to recover high-value metals, such as gold from electronic wastes. Chromobacterium violaceum has been investigated in the recovery of gold from electronic waste. Metabolically engineered C. violaceum strains, which produced 1.5 times more cyanide than the wild type, made possible three times more gold biorecovery from electronic scrap metal (Tay et al. 2013). Likewise, mutant strains of C. violaceum that have been generated by random mutagenesis were shown to cause twofold improvement of gold recovery from electronic scrap metal (Natarajan and Ting 2014).

In addition to bioleaching, microorganisms can also be employed to mobilize critical and scarce metals and remove them from contaminated sites during bioremediation. These scarce elements are essential in many industries ranging from electronics to healthcare. However, they may also accumulate in the environment and cause pollution (Nancharaiah et al. 2016). Bacterial recovery and recycling of these elements by immobilization are potentially safer and more efficient than the current practice makes possible. Tellurium, one of the rarest elements in the Earth’s crust (0.00001 %), has multiple applications in antimicrobials, photovoltaic (PV) modules and thermoelectric generators. A hydrothermal vent bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain EPR3 has been shown to be able to reduce and methylate tellurium into insoluble metallic tellurium particles and gaseous tellurium species, respectively, from various tellurium-containing compounds, such as cadmium telluride, bismuth telluride, autoclave slime and tellurium dioxide (Bonificio and Clarke 2014). This concentrates the scarce element for downstream recovery processes.

Selenium, chromium and uranium from anthropogenic sources, such as wastewater, can contaminate the environment. These metals are also widely used in the industry and by the military. Hence, they should be recovered to meet industrial needs besides being removed in bioremediation. Microbial conversion of soluble selenium, chromium and uranium into the insoluble elements may be exploited in the biological treatment of wastewater. Soluble oxyanions of selenium (SeO4 2−, SeO3 2−) can be reduced by microorganisms to insoluble selenium, which lowers its bioavailability in the environment (Nancharaiah and Lens 2015). The dissimilatory metal-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 can reduce soluble chromium(VI) to insoluble chromium(III) precipitates, which accumulate in the extracellular matrix (Belchik et al. 2011). Soluble uranium(VI) species in the environment may be extracted by microbial processes, such as biosorption onto cells, intracellular bioaccumulation, bioprecipitation to hydrogen uranyl phosphate (HUO2PO4) and bioreduction as uranite (UO2) (Nancharaiah et al. 2016). Enzymatic bioprecipitation of U(VI) to uranium phosphate precipitates is a recent attractive approach for bioremediation of uranium, as the precipitates are not susceptible to changes in oxidation state, thus functioning as a stable long-term sink for uranium (Kulkarni et al. 2013). The insoluble particles of these elements may then be recovered and used in industrial applications.

Repair of concrete and carbonate stone

Bacteria capable of biomineralization can be used for the biological repair of small cracks in concrete as well as the development of self-healing concrete (DeJong et al. 2006; Seifan et al. 2016). Alkali resistant Bacillus sp., which precipitates calcium carbonate as calcite, aragonite and vaterite minerals, have been investigated as potential healing agents (Jonkers and Schlangen 2008; Van Tittelboom et al. 2010; Wiktor and Jonkers 2011). In addition, Bacillus sp. form thick-walled spores, which can be viable for more than 200 years in dry conditions (Schlegel 1993). Bacillus sp. have been reported to be able to survive when incorporated in cement and, hence, are potential candidates in the development of self-healing concrete (Jonkers 2007). The EPS produced by the biofilms of calcifying bacteria trap calcium ions, thus facilitating calcium carbonate mineralization and healing of the cracks (Ercole et al. 2012). Bacteria can be externally applied or incorporated into concrete as a healing agent for the filling of cracks and the production of self-healing concrete respectively (Jonkers and Schlangen 2008; Van Tittelboom et al. 2010). As compared to conventional methods of concrete repair, which pose environmental and health hazards, bacterial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation is a pollution free alternative (Van Tittelboom et al. 2010). It has been shown that precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of calcium by externally applied Bacillus sphaericus resulted in complete filling of 10-mm deep cracks, similar to the results observed when the cracks were traditionally treated with epoxy. The calcium carbonate crystals formed may also contribute to a further decrease in water permeability observed in cracks treated with active bacteria, as compared to autoclaved bacteria. In another study, it was shown that the incorporation of high numbers of Bacillus pseudofirmus (5.8 × 108 cm−3 cement stone) did not significantly decrease the compressive strength of concrete (Jonkers and Schlangen 2008). Calcium carbonate precipitation by bacteria may also be a method to protect monuments and sculptures made of carbonate stone (Mapelli et al. 2012). Hence, the use of calcifying bacteria such as Bacillus sp. is a promising tool for concrete and carbonate stone repair.

pH control

Calcite and silicate minerals can also be used for pH control in biological systems. Both calcite and silicate minerals are easily obtainable from natural environments. Calcium carbonate may potentially be used as a neutralizing agent in microbial biotechnological applications such as anaerobic fermentation to produce acetic and lactic acid or in wastewater treatment plants (Salek et al. 2015). Calcium carbonate is 60–80 % cheaper than the current neutralizing agent sodium carbonate, translating to a reduction in operational costs (Halmann and Steinfeld 2006). In addition, active pH control is not required as the use of calcium carbonate forms a self-regulating pH system in which the pH will not exceed 8.5 due to the nature of calcium carbonate (Salek et al. 2015). The pH control is required in lactic acid fermentation processes, as the decrease in pH with increasing lactic acid production will result in feedback inhibition, inhibiting further production of lactic acid by the microorganisms. Although ammonia, sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide are efficient neutralizers in lactic acid fermentation, ammonia toxicity can result in lowering of the final acid yield and cell concentration. The use of calcium hydroxide not only results in high lactic acid yields but also generates calcium sulphate, as a solid waste in the extraction process. Hence, a method for the production of lactic acid was developed using recycled calcium carbonate as a neutralizing agent without the generation of calcium sulphate (Yang et al. 2015). It was reported that recycled calcium carbonate can maintain a higher pH at higher lactate concentrations, as compared to that of original calcium carbonate in a fermentation culture of Lactobacillus lactis, leading to improved lactic acid yields. This was due to the small particle size and increased surface area of the recycled calcium carbonate, which resulted in higher dissolution rates. In addition, L. lactis was adsorbed to the rough surface of the recycled calcium carbonate and formed holes on the particles, which enable them to function as favourable microenvironments for microbial growth and production of lactic acid (Yang et al. 2015). Other studies have demonstrated the buffering potential of nepheline, an aluminosilicate mineral, in acid mine water (Kleiv and Sandvick 2000).

Recent studies examined the use of silicates as long-term pH buffering agents to maintain pH in acidified groundwater during bioremediation. Chlorinated ethenes, such as tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE), are common groundwater contaminants in industrialized countries (Lacroix et al. 2014a). A cost-effective method of bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes is the dechlorination of these compounds by organohalide-respiring bacteria (OHRB) in organohalide respiration (OHR) to form non-toxic ethene (Lee et al. 1998). However, substrate fermentation and OHR generate acids, which acidify the groundwater. This drastically inhibits OHR, as OHRB are inactivated at decreased pH (Lacroix et al. 2014b). Circulation of sodium bicarbonate or sodium carbonate solutions is commonly used to adjust the pH of groundwater during OHR (Robinson et al. 2009). However, this only has a short-term effect and requires constant monitoring with frequent injections. In comparison, the dissolution of silicate minerals is relatively slow, which enables them to function as long-term sources of alkalinity. Formate dehydrogenation, an alternative method of pH control that generates only bicarbonate without acid production, may be insufficient in cases of high dechlorination rates (Philips et al. 2013). Additionally, the dissolution of silicate minerals is stimulated by acidity, thus avoiding pH overshooting and wastage of buffering material (Marini 2006). Silicate minerals forsterite, diopside and fayalite maintained pH in the neutral range in batch cultures of OHRB, facilitating complete dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes to ethene (Lacroix et al. 2014a, b). Hence, silicates may be potential good-buffering agents in the bioremediation of acidified groundwater.

Conclusion and future perspectives

Microorganisms interact with minerals in various ways, and these interactions play vital roles in natural and engineered environments by mediating biological and geochemical processes. Solid minerals provide a surface for the stable attachment of biofilms, function as electron acceptors and donors and as reservoirs for macro and/or micronutrients, as well as electron transfer conduits facilitating intercellular interactions. Microbe-mineral interactions are major contributors to the biodeterioration of engineered materials, resulting in degradation of cultural heritage sites and infrastructures. On the other hand, the interactions between microorganisms and solid minerals have been exploited for various biotechnological applications, such as improvement of anaerobic digestion performance, enhancement of bioelectrochemical performance, metal recovery, repair of concrete and carbonate stone, and pH control in microbial fermentation.

Although extensive studies have been conducted in elucidating microorganism-mineral interactions in natural and engineered environments, our understanding of biofilm formation on mineral surfaces is limited. While most studies have focussed on the effects of biofilm formation on minerals and their significance, the molecular mechanisms involved in biofilm development on mineral surfaces are not well understood. Whether and how interactions with mineral surfaces influence the genetic regulation networks of the biofilm lifestyle are interesting research topics to explore. Further understanding of the genetic regulation of biofilm formation on solid minerals may be exploited for other novel biotechnological applications in the future.