Abstract
We hypothesize that bacterial endophytes may enhance the competitiveness and invasiveness of Phragmites australis. To evaluate this hypothesis, endophytic bacteria were isolated from P. australis. The majority of the shoot meristem isolates represent species from phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. We chose one species from each phylum to characterize further and to conduct growth promotion experiments in Phragmites. Bacteria tested include Bacillus amyloliquefaciens A9a, Achromobacter spanius B1, and Microbacterium oxydans B2. Isolates were characterized for known growth promotional traits, including indole acetic acid (IAA) production, secretion of hydrolytic enzymes, phosphate solubilization, and antibiosis activity. Potentially defensive antimicrobial lipopeptides were assayed for through application of co-culturing experiments and mass spectrometer analysis. B. amyloliquefaciens A9a and M. oxydans B2 produced IAA. B. amyloliquefaciens A9a secreted antifungal lipopeptides. Capability to promote growth of P. australis under low nitrogen conditions was evaluated in greenhouse experiments. All three isolates were found to increase the growth of P. australis under low soil nitrogen conditions and showed increased absorption of isotopic nitrogen into plants. This suggests that the Phragmites microbes we evaluated most likely promote growth of Phragmites by enhanced scavenging of nitrogenous compounds from the rhizosphere and transfer to host roots. Collectively, our results support the hypothesis that endophytic bacteria play a role in enhancing growth of P. australis in natural populations. Gaining a better understanding of the precise contributions and mechanisms of endophytes in enabling P. australis to develop high densities rapidly could lead to new symbiosis-based strategies for management and control of the host.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud.) is a perennial grass native to Eurasian wetlands and currently found on every continent [31]. Although the subspecies of Phragmites (P. australis spp. americanus) is native to North American wetlands [70], the invasive subspecies (P. australis spp. australis) has aggressively outcompeted it and many other native species. This macrophyte is highly productive, even in low nutrient environments and outcompetes other plants to create large monodominant populations that can decrease diversity of plants and animals [76, 79]. Its success in invasion has been related to its ecological range [47, 48], high genetic diversity [23], and high efficiency of dispersion, able to colonize different sites via seed dispersal and clonal growth through frequent tillering [55]. Phragmites is also effective in taking up nitrogen from the soil, and the aboveground standing stocks of nitrogen may be 2–3 times higher in Phragmites stands [54]. This is consistent with our understanding that invasive plant-driven changes in soil N cycles (e.g., changes in soil microbial or mutualism communities) may play an important role during successful plant invasion [78].
Mutualisms between plants and their microbiomes are common and may facilitate the plant invasion processes [13]. Specifically, the competitive ability of invasive plants can be increased through mutualistic associations that increase growth, increase tolerance to salinity, reduce herbivory, or increase tolerance to drought stress [4, 6, 33, 66, 77]. For example, nitrogen-fixing endophytic bacteria are involved in the invasiveness of Sorghum halepense in soil with low concentration of nitrogen [69]. Plant microbes can live epiphytically (on the surface of the plant) or endophytically (within the plant), and bacteria and fungi that colonize the internal tissue of the plant showing no external sign of infection or negative effect on their host are called endophytes [72]. These microorganisms are beneficial to plants through auxin production [62], N2 fixation, or increased mineralization of soil nutrients [46, 85] that results in plant growth promotion. They also can help plants increase tolerance to stresses, including soils contaminated by heavy metals [44]. Natural products synthesized by endophytic bacteria can induce resistance to plant pathogens [8] or biocontrol phytopathogens by lipopeptide resulting in plant growth [64]. Some endophytic bacteria help plants to acquire minerals from inaccessible sources solubilizing phosphorus as orthophosphate in cactus growing on rocky areas [49].
Understanding the relationship between P. australis and its microbial symbionts could lead to the development of methodologies for disrupting or manipulating the specific symbiotic relationships in order to reduce the invasive character of the host [39]. Endophytic fungi [5, 24] and bacteria [45, 50] have been isolated from leaves, roots, and rhizomes of P. australis but not yet from meristematic tissues. Characterization of the identity and functional role of microorganisms in invasive species are the first steps for the development of new management techniques [39], so this study characterized endophytic bacteria in P. australis subsp. australis meristematic tissues and tested their plant growth-promoting attributes under low nitrogen conditions. Our hypothesis was that endophytic bacteria in Phragmites australis subsp. australis contribute to promotion of plant growth under low nitrogen conditions.
Materials and Methods
Isolation, Metabolic Characterization, and Plant Growth-Promoting Attributes of Endophytic Bacteria
Young stems (∼15 cm length) of five individuals of P. australis subsp. australis were collected from a population on the roadside in a moist wooded area at the junction of Dudley Road and Ryders Lane on the Cook campus of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ. Tissues were superficially disinfected with a 2 % sodium hypochlorite solution for 7 min and then rinsed three times with sterile water. Tissue fragments (2 × 2 mm) were placed onto plates containing 10 % trypticase soy agar (TSA) and 1 % yeast extract + 1 % sucrose (YES) media. Ten replica plates (10 fragments/plate) were made for each culture medium. The plates were kept at room temperature and growth was assessed periodically. Bacteria strains were stored at −80 °C in the Department of Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers University.
Genomic DNA from bacteria was isolated using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN®). The identification of endophytic bacteria was done sequencing the 16S rDNA region (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 1). Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR fingerprinting profiles [36] were obtained. Then, 16S rDNA was sequenced for 12 strains (A9a, A12a, A28, A30, B1, B2, B3, B5, B9, B19a, B42b, and B25) coming from three ERIC-PCR groups. All sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers: KP860304–KP860314. Sequences were identified by comparison to GenBank accessions using BLASTn (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Seventy-one carbon source utilization tests and 23 chemical-sensitivity tests of bacteria were performed using GNIII microplates (96 wells) from Biolog Corporation (USA) to metabolic characterization of bacteria. The data were transformed into a binary matrix (0 = no active metabolism, 1 = active metabolism). Using the binary matrix, the similarity between the metabolic profile of strains was calculated using the Jaccard coefficient with NTSySpc 2.11T (Applied Biostatistics, Setauket-USA).
Functional traits involved in promoting plant growth were determined by standard procedures: production of indoleacetic acid (IAA) was assayed with Salkowski’s reagent [41]; phosphate solubilization ability of the strains was tested by spotting bacteria on GL-rich medium [74]; production of cellulase, protease, amylase, and esterase was determined according to Carrim et al. [14]; nitrogenase activity was determined by the acetylene reduction assay (ARA) [29] and growth of strain in N-free glucose medium [58].
Testing for Antibiosis Against Filamentous Fungi and Lipopeptide Production
Some species of bacteria are known to inhibit growth of pathogenic fungi (Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) and non-pathogenic (Aspergillus flavus), so we tested for antagonistic associations using our microbes. Antibiosis between endophytic bacteria and fungi was evaluated in 10 % TSA. Discs containing mycelium of fungi were inoculated in the center of a plate, and bacteria were transferred to two equidistant points in the plate. Controls were inoculated only with the fungi. Three replicates were made for each fungus, and the plates were incubated at lab-ambient temperature. Zones of inhibition between bacteria and fungal colonies were measured at 2-day intervals. Antagonism was expressed as a percentage of mycelial growth compared to control treatment.
Genomic DNA from bacteria was used to amplify surfactin, inturin A, bacillomycin, and fengycin genes. The oligonucleotides and program sets used in the PCR amplifications are listed in Table 1. Amplified fragments were purified and sequenced. Sequences were analyzed using BLASTx and BLASTn algorithms available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Crude extract containing lipopeptides was obtained according to Zhao et al. [87]. The lipopeptide precipitate was resuspended in 10 mL of methanol to yield the crude extract of lipopeptide (CEL). CEL was analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) [27]. The CEL in methanol was characterized by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry [37]. Positive ion detection and the reflector mode were used. Data were acquired at reflector positive mode from 800 to 4.000 and the data were compared with the references (see Electronic Supplementary Material Table 3).
Plant Growth Promotion under Low Nitrogen Conditions
P. australis seeds obtained from populations on Sandy Hook Island, New Jersey, were stratified at 4 °C for 6 months then planted for germination in trays containing vermiculite. The trays were placed in the greenhouse at 17:16 °C day/night cycle, 75 % relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 15 h (300 μE) for 12 days. Trays were irrigated daily with tap water. The bacteria strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at room temperature under stirring 150 rpm. Seedlings were immersed in the bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.8) for 2 h. Control seedlings were immersed in sterile LB. The seedlings were then transplanted to 3-in. pots containing vermiculite/soil mix (3:1) 2× autoclaved (1 atm and 121 °C) for 1 h. Soil mix was purchased from Fafard® Growing Mix 2. Every 15 days, the plants were sprayed with bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.8) or sterile LB media (control). The experimental design was completely randomized and built with 17 repetitions for each treatments: control (without bacteria inoculation) and three bacteria species inoculated separately. A nutrient solution (Hoagland’s nutrient nitrogen-free solution) was added every 15 days until the percolation of the solution. The pots were placed in the greenhouse at 17:16 °C day/night cycle, 75 % relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 15 h (300 μE). The plants were harvested and rinsed in tap water 45 days after inoculation. Shoot length was measured for each plant before they were stored in a dryer at 70 ° C until a constant dry weight. The dry weights of aboveground and belowground plant parts were determined using an analytical balance. Growth promotion efficacy (GPE %) was estimated to elucidate the relative effect of tested strains on plant according to Almoneafy et al. [3] using the following formula: GPE (%) = [(G T − G C)/G C] × 100. Where, GPE refers to growth promotion efficacy, G T refers to growth parameter in bacteria-treated group, and G C refers to growth parameter in control group.
In order to quantify bacteria-associated nitrogen fixation in plants, we conducted isotopic N15 gas assimilation experiments with multiple air controls. Three plants from each treatment in the greenhouse experiment were collected and placed in a gas chamber filled with 33 mL of 15 N-labeled gas (N2, NH4, NO3 and NO2; Sigma-Aldrich Lot MBBB0968V). One plant from each treatment was placed in ambient air to confirm the absence of 15 N assimilation. After a 10-day incubation period under 12 h alternating light/dark cycle, we removed the plants from the chamber and washed them. We oven dried all samples for 24 h at 80 °C to prepare for mass spectroscopic 14:15 N ratio analysis. After drying, we sent 0.9–1.0 g of dried material to the Stable Isotope/Soil Biology Laboratory at the Odum School of Ecology at the University of Georgia for analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical evaluation of growth parameters and assimilation 15 N gas was performed by ANOVA and the differences between treatment were estimated by Duncan’s test (SPSS version 20, IBM, USA).
Results
Isolation, Metabolic Characterization, and Plant Growth-Promoting Attributes of Endophytic Bacteria
The rate of isolation of bacteria from the sample fragments was higher (T test, p < 0.001) in 1 % YES medium (94.0 %) compared to 10 % TSA (34.8 %). We isolated 45 strains and their genetic diversity was verified by ERIC-PCR. The molecular identification via blast 16S rDNA revealed that ERIC-PCR groups represented three different species. The largest group of strains was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (99 % identity with sequences deposited in GenBank; phylum = Firmicutes). Other groups of strains were obtained with high identity to sequences of Achromobacter spanius (phylum = Betaproteobacteria), and Microbacterium oxydans (phylum = Actinobacteria), respectively. B. amyloliquefaciens was isolated frequently (75.5 %), followed by A. spanius (15.5 %) and M. oxydans (8.8 %).
Metabolic profiles of B. amyloliquefaciens (strains A9a, B2, and B5), A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 were done using GEN III Microplates. There were no differences in the metabolic profiles among the three strains of B. amyloliquefaciens (A9a, B3, and B5); however, profiles among the three species were very different. B. amyloliquefaciens A9a and M. oxydans B2 had higher metabolic similarity (Jaccard coefficient 0.6951), using 49 and 55 different carbon sources, respectively, from Biolog Inc. (Hayward, CA, USA). A. spanius B1 used only 27 carbon sources and its profile showed a similarity coefficient under 0.5 with A9a (Jaccard coefficient 0.4000) and B2 (Jaccard coefficient 0.4578). The three species demonstrated variation in susceptibility to chemical compounds. Although B. amyloliquefaciens A9a grew in all evaluated salt concentrations (1, 4, and 8 % NaCl), this strain was sensitive to troleandomycin, minocycline, lincomycin, niaproof 4, vancomycin, tetrazolium violet, and blue tetrazolium. A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 showed no metabolic activity on 8 % NaCl. Strain B1 was the most resistant to chemical compounds, being sensitive to only 1 % sodium lactate, minocycline, potassium tellurite, and sodium bromate.
Important functional traits for promoting plant growth were detected in B. amyloliquefaciens A9a, A. spanius B1, and M. oxydans B2 (Table 1). The three strains were able to grow in nitrogen-free media and to reduce acetylene. M. oxydans B2 stood out for IAA synthesis (11.75 ± 0.28 μg/mL); almost three times the concentration synthesized by B. amyloliquefaciens A9a (3.78 ± 0.15 μg/mL). IAA was not detected in the culture supernatant from A. spanius B1. B. amyloliquefaciens A9a secreted amylase, protease, cellulase, and esterase, while A. spanius A1 and M. oxydans B2 showed activity only for lipase and protease, respectively. None of the three species solubilized phosphate.
Antagonism against Fungi and Characterization of Bacterial Lipopeptides
B. amyloliquefaciens A9a inhibited the growth of pathogens in vitro (Table 1). Inhibition ranged from 25 % ± 1.3 to 55.9 % ± 2.5 for A. flavus and A. alternata, respectively. The mycelium treated with lipopeptides suffered morphological changes showing development of swollen, pigmented chlamydospore-like structures. TLC separation showed at least four spots in the B. amyloliquefaciens A9a extract, suggesting that four distinct lipopeptides were present. A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 did not show antibiosis against fungi.
Key genes in lipopeptide synthesis were amplified and detected from B. amyloliquefaciens (A9a, B3, and B5) and M. oxydans B2 DNA using specific primers (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 1). ipa14, fenD, and ituC were detected in both bacterial species, and srfAA, bmy ,and ituD were amplified only from B. amyloliquefaciens strains. The fragment sizes and sequences of lipopeptide genes were very similar between B amyloliquefaciens (A9a, B3, and B5) and M. oxydans B2 (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 2). We did not detect any lipopeptide genes in A. spanius B1 with any primer sets (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 1).
The nucleotide sequences of the amplified fragments had high homology (98–100 %) to the lipopeptide genes from B. amyloliquefaciens strains (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 2): surfactin (srfAA); iturin A (ipa14, ituC, ituD, and bmy); and fengicin (fenD). The sequence of translated amino acids showed high homology (98–100 % identity BlastX) and had conserved domains with lipopeptide synthesis enzymes in B. amyloliquefaciens. We used two other B. amyloliquefaciens strains—B3 and B5—to amplify and sequence the genes involved in the synthesis of lipopeptides. Amplification and sequencing of these fragments demonstrated that they were similar to those obtained for the strain A9a. These data and ERIC-PCR fingerprinting corroborate the identity of B3 and B5 as B. amyloliquefaciens.
The antifungal activity of the CEL from B. amyloliquefaciens A9a was confirmed in vitro using 0, 4, and 40 μg/mL in media (Fig. 1). Reduction in fungal growth was concentration-dependent. A. alternata and C. gloeosporioides were more sensitive to the extracts in culture media. Mycelial growth of both species was completely inhibited at the highest concentration used (40 μg/mL). The growth of other plant pathogens ranged between 88.98 and 96.82 % with 40 μg/mL of extract. The activities of the extracts of A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 were not evaluated because the cultures did not show antibiosis and we could not detect the presence of lipopeptides via TLC [27].
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry of CEL from B. amyloliquefaciens A9a indicated presence of clusters of peaks (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 3). One cluster of peaks in the range of 1016.60 to 1111.47 m/z ratio corresponded to iturin and bacillomycin isoforms and homologues. Another cluster of peaks was observed in the range of 1435.73 to 1529.74 m/z ratio corresponding to fengycin isoforms and homologues. The third cluster of peaks corresponded to surfactin (1016.60 to 1043.53 m/z). One peak (939.5 m/z) represents kurstakins, the lowest molecular weight group of lipopeptides. The peak at 1421.7 m/z may be identified as bacitracin. The possible assignments for 33 m/z peaks are presented in Supporting information Table 3. Most of the detected peaks are iturin and fengycin variations and these corresponded to approximately 64 % of detected peaks. B. amyloliquefaciens C6c showed the co-production of different homologous compounds for each lipopeptide family (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 3). Nineteen peaks were not identified by the mass m/z because they did not correspond to any published m/z masses.
Although lipopeptides were not detected from CEL of A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 by TLC analysis, MALDI-TOF showed a few peaks of lipopeptides. The peaks 939.5 (kurstakin) and 1488.7 (fengycin) m/z were detected in extracts from A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2. M. oxydans B2 showed a third peak 1502.8 m/z (fengycin).
Unidentified peaks were similar between the three species (827.4, 926.4, 1052.6 m/z), between B. amyloliquefaciens A9a and A. spanius B1 (852.4 and 997.4 m/z), and between A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 (911.4, 1359.7, and 1688.8 m/z). These results suggest that in some cases, these may be producing the same or similar compounds; however, this needs to be confirmed by further chemical analyses.
Growth Promotion of P. australis by Endophytic Bacteria
Our greenhouse experiment showed a significant effect on plant growth when seedlings were inoculated with endophytic bacteria (Table 2). Aboveground stem height of inoculated plants was 96.4–124.2 % higher than that of the control treatment (Duncan <0.01). All bacterial treatments increased plant root biomass of treated plants over the control treated with only media (Duncan <0.01). Similar results were obtained for the total biomass. Plants inoculated with A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 resulted in an increase of 109.7 and 198.4 %, respectively, in accumulation of aboveground dry matter. The greatest increase of total biomass was observed in plants inoculated with M. oxydans B2 (221.4 %), followed by A. spanius B1(150.0 %) and B. amyloliquefaciens A9a (120.7 %).
In a 15 N2 gas assimilation experiment (Table 3), mass spectroscopic analysis showed that P. australis incorporated 15 N into tissues. Highest incorporation into leaves and stems was observed in plants inoculated with A. spanius B1. Highest incorporation into roots was observed in plants inoculated with M. oxydans B2 and A. spanius B1. Bacterial inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and M. oxydans did not change N incorporation into stems over what was seen in non-inoculated controls. However, bacterial inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and M. oxydans increased N incorporation into leaves over what was seen in non-inoculated controls. Plants that had not been exposed to 15 N2 gas showed minimal 15 N content.
Discussion
Isolation, Metabolic Characterization, and Plant Growth-Promoting Attributes of Endophytic Bacteria
Roots and leaves host different endophytic species distinguished by the structure and composition of the organ-specific communities [12, 40, 52]. Root endophytic bacteria are reasonably well studied with respect to location and interactions with the host; comparatively little is known about endophytes associated with shoot meristems [63]. The shoot meristems are an important tissue responsible for the growth and development of new leaves and stems. We reason also that endophytes that colonize shoots are more likely to be transmitted with seeds than endophytes that remain in roots. Thus, aerial organ endophytes may be critical microbes in terms of survival value and competitive enhancement.
Endophytes examined in this study were obtained from Phragmites from a single collection site. Our results showed that cultivable endophytic bacteria community composition in shoot meristematic tissues consisted of: B. amyloliquefaciens (Firmicutes 75.5 %), A. spanius (Proteobacteria 15.5 %), and M. oxydans (Actinobacteria 8.8 %). The metabolic profiles of both Gram-positive strains, B. amyloliquefaciens and Microbacterium oxydans, were more similar to each other (0.6951 Coef Jaccard) than to the Gram-negative bacterium A. spanius. B. amyloliquefaciens A9a could be considered a halophilic bacterium since it was capable of growth at high concentrations of NaCl.
The three species of bacteria we isolated from shoots of P. australis have not previously been identified in communities of Phragmites endophytes. There are a few papers regarding endophytic bacteria of P. australis, but these papers have used roots and rhizomes for isolation of bacteria [43, 71]. Various biotic and abiotic factors influence the composition of the microbiota associated with plants [9, 26]. We propose that the kind of tissue used and the environmental conditions have effects on the community composition of endophytes in P. australis [43, see 71].
B. amyloliquefaciens was the most frequently isolated endophyte among the bacteria isolated. This bacterium is a Gram-positive, motile, spore-forming, rod-shaped bacterium that is present in the soil or in plant hosts as an endophyte. It has been classified into two subspecies B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum (for plant-associated strains) and B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens (for soil strains) [10]. Our Phragmites isolate is B. amyloliquefaciens ssp. plantarum. B. amyloliquefaciens is a bacterium that is known to stimulate plant growth and produce secondary metabolites that suppress plant pathogens [16, 84]. A. spanius is a Gram-negative, oxidase- and catalase-positive, rod-shaped bacterium that has been previously found to colonize the rhizoplanes and internal tissues of annual ryegrass [15, 28]. The genus Microbacterium contains species that are Gram-positive rods and have been found to be endophytic in tomato roots [53] and in maize grains [88].
Antagonism against Pathogens and Characterization of Lipopeptides of Endophytes
B. amyloliquefaciens and other closely related Bacillus sp. have been used to successfully control many plant pathogenic fungi [83, 86]. B. amyloliquefaciens A9a may be a defensive endophyte of Phragmites. Based on our results, B. amyloliquefaciens A9a exhibited high antibiosis activity against several phytopathogenic fungi. This bacterium is known to produce antifungal lipopeptides that may be secreted into the growth medium [41]. It is generally accepted that these compounds help the host defend against pathogens, inducing systemic responses in plants [34] or acting directly on the pathogen as an “antibiotic” [60]. The lipopeptides produced by numerous Bacillus spp. are classified into three families depending on their amino acid sequences: surfactins; iturins (iturins, mycosubtilin and bacillomycins); and fengycins [59]. These molecules are synthesized by non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) encoded by operons in bacteria [65]. The genes involved in lipopeptide synthesis have been previously detected in B. amyloliquefaciens [35] and their sequences are well conserved among different strains of this species [17].
The antagonistic activity of A9a correlated with antifungal activity of CEL (Table 1). The antifungal activity of the extract was concentration-dependent, completely inhibiting growth of A. alternata and C. gloeosporioides at 40 μg/mL. Our MALDI-TOF analysis of CEL exhibited peaks that may be attributed to the sodium and potassium adducts of lipopeptides [19]. By comparing the mass with the mass numbers reported for the lipopeptide complexes from other Bacillus strains (Electronic Supplementary Material Table 3), we found four lipopeptide families from A9a CEL: iturin, surfactin, fengycin, and kurstakins. Kurstakin was discovered in B. thuringiensis and considered to be a biomarker of this species. However, it was later detected in other species of Bacillus [7]. We did not find reports of synthesis of kurstakin by B. amyloliquefaciens, but we do know that purified kurstakins can display antifungal activities [30]. We detected one MALDI-TOF peak corresponding to bacitracin, an antibiotic synthesized by both B. subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis [22]. Bacillomycin, a member of the iturin family, has been reported together with fengycin to have strong antifungal activity, being responsible for the main antagonistic activity of the commercially available biological control strain B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 against F. oxysporum [75]. Surfactins have weak antifungal activity but are known for their biosurfactant, hemolytic, antiviral, and antibacterial activities [11]. Fengycins are less hemolytic than either surfactins or iturins and possess strong antifungal capacity, specifically against filamentous fungi [19, 51].
Interestingly, fenD, ipa14, and ituC were also amplified from the M. oxydans B2 DNA indicating that this species may also be able to synthesize fengycin and iturin. We detected by MALDI-TOF only fengycin from the M. oxydans CEL. The failure to detect lipopeptide genes in A. spanius B1 could be due to the absence of the genes in this bacterium or simply failure of the primers to match lipopeptide genes of this species. Our results showed that detection of lipopeptide genes by PCR may not represent the actual capacity of synthesis and/or secretion of these compounds. In this study, we detected via PCR two sequences of genes (ituC and ipa14) in M. oxydans B2, but we were unable to detect either lipopeptide by TLC or by MALDI-TOF analysis.
MALDI-TOF analysis indicated kurstakin and one peak of fengycin in A. spanius B1 and M. oxydans B2 extracts, and a second peak in M. oxydans B2 corresponding to fengycin. We did not find reports of synthesis of kurstakin by these species. The amount of secreted lipopeptide was not sufficient to inhibit fungal growth in vitro in our antibiosis experiment. These results lead us to believe that M. oxydans B2 may have non-functional genes or the growth conditions were not favorable for lipopeptide operon expression. The oligos used for Gram-positive bacteria (B. amyloliquefaciens A9a and M. oxydans B2) did not work in Gram-negative bacteria (A. spanius B1).
The Role of Increased Nitrogen Assimilation in Growth Promotion of P. australis by Endophytic Bacteria
Endophytic infections often lead to enhanced plant productivity, either by producing plant growth hormones, enhancing nutrient acquisition, synthesizing metabolites that restrict vertebrate or invertebrate herbivory, or reducing disease susceptibility [68]. Our three microbes show some of these same capabilities. Endophytic fungi [5, 24] and bacteria [45, 50] are associated with leaves, roots, and rhizomes of P. australis. The functional roles of this community in adaptability and growth promotion has not been fully determined, although, fungal endophytes belonging to genus Stagonospora (isolated from Phragmites seeds) were shown to enhance reed biomass [21].
Invasive species often have a competitive advantage over the native community from the moment when the invaders enter the environment. One of the main factors for successful plant invasion is that invading plants often affect nitrogen cycles via direct and/or indirect ways, such as changes in soil microbial communities, litter decomposition rates, and/or soil physicochemical properties [78].
The results of our isotopic nitrogen gas assimilation experiment (Table 3) show that all three bacteria substantially increased the amount of isotopic nitrogen that accumulated in Phragmites plants over absorption into plants where bacteria were not applied. The bacteria we tested all possess the enzymatic capability to absorb nitrates, nitrites, nitrogen oxide and ammonia molecules that may be impurities in the isotopic nitrogen gas used in our experiments [18]. Thus with our data, it is not possible to determine if increased accumulation of isotopic nitrogen in the plants is due to nitrogen fixation or enhanced absorption of 15 N-labeled ammonia, nitrate or nitrous oxide present in the molecular nitrogen. What is clear from our data is that all three microbes increase accumulation of isotopic nitrogen into plants.
Results of the acetylene reduction tests (Table 1) indicate that all three bacteria are capable of nitrogen fixation, and it is possible that at least some of the 15 N accumulation in plant tissues could be the result of nitrogen fixation by the applied microbes. However, we do not have any direct evidence that the observed growth promotion of Phragmites is the result of nitrogen fixation by the microbes we applied to plants. Instead, we hypothesize that increased efficiency of nutrient absorption from rhizosphere nutrient pools contributes to the growth promotional effects we observed in our experiments (Table 2) [see 67]. A similar mechanism for microbially enhanced nitrogen accumulation in plants was proposed by Hurek et al. [32] where it was found that kallar grass bearing rhizobacteria that were incapable of nitrogen fixation nevertheless enhanced nitrogen accumulation into plants. Endophytes that colonize surfaces of roots may increase nitrogen available to the plant through enhanced scavenging of organic nitrogen and perhaps other forms of nitrogen in the rhizosphere [80]. In Phragmites, root microbes may collaborate with plants to increase nitrogen supply by secreting proteases around roots to degrade microbial enzymes forming peptide fragments that may be absorbed by roots [1, 2]. It has also been shown that microbes that associate with roots may colonize surfaces of roots and also become internalized within root cells where they degrade as roots develop [61, 80, 81]. Continuous internal re-colonization of growing root meristems by surface microbes could result in a continuous transfer of nutrients from microbial community pools outside roots to microbes within root cells and ultimately to the host root. Microbially enhanced transfer of nutrients to host roots from rhizosphere nutrient pools could explain the plant growth promotion observed in our experiments. Results of growth promotional experiments (Table 2) and nitrogen absorption experiments (Table 3) are consistent with this hypothesis. The growth promotion efficiency (GPE) of the three strains of bacteria in order of magnitude was B2 > B1 > A9a. Examination of isotopic absorption data shows that absorption in order of magnitude in leaves was B1 > A9a > B2; absorption in stems was B1 > A9a > B2; absorption in roots was B2 > B1 > A9a. Only in roots do we see a correlation between increased absorption of isotopic nitrogen and the observed GPE. This is consistent with a scenario where enhanced absorption of rhizosphere nutrients plays a role in the growth promotion we observed in our experiments. The growth promotional microbes that we evaluated may in essence be functioning through facilitation of the transfer of nutrients from the rhizosphere to roots. Additional experiments would be needed to further evaluate this proposed nitrogen-scavenging mechanism.
There is some evidence that the way invasive Phragmites manages nitrogen may in fact be key to its competitive nature. Invasive P. australis outperforms native species in environments with both high and low soil nitrogen levels [25, 42]. Interestingly, its most aggressive growth can occur in low oxygen environments; for example, in swamp soils, where P. australis has been shown to utilize organic nitrogen from rhizospheres of roots to a greater extent than its competitors [56, 57]. Enhanced absorption of organic nitrogen could be the result of the collaborative symbiosis with root microbes [80]. Nitrogen sources could also include increasing nitrogen availability to Phragmites through associative nitrogen fixation [20, 73]. Additional studies are needed to evaluate whether associative nitrogen fixation is an important source of nitrogen for the plant.
In terms of nitrogen management, microbes may play other roles. For example, under low oxygen conditions, as is often seen in water-soaked soils where Phragmites grows, ammonia may accumulate to toxic levels in plant tissues [38, 82]. The ability of plants to cope with and manage high levels of ammonia and other nitrogenous compounds may be important in efficient metabolism and growth of P. australis. In this respect, it may be significant that bacteria often possess transporters for absorption of ammonium and other nitrogenous compounds. It is conceivable that some Phragmites endophytes could function in part in detoxification of ammonia or ammonium from tissues of Phragmites. By absorption of potentially toxic levels of ammonia from the immediate environment of the plant and converting it to forms that are better assimilated by the host such as nitrates or amino acids, endophytes may effectively increase nitrogen use efficiency in the host and avoid oxidative stress related to ammonia toxicity.
References
Adamczyk B, Godlewski M, Zimny J, Zimny A (2008) Wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings secrete proteases from roots, and after protein addition, grow well on medium without inorganic nitrogen. Plant Biol 10:718–724
Adamczyk B, Smolander A, Kitunen V, Godlewski M (2010) Proteins as nitrogen source for plants, a short story about exudation of proteases by plant roots. Plant Signal Behav 5:817–819
Almoneafy AA, Kakar KU, Nawaz Z, Li B, Ali M, Chun-lan Y, Xie G (2014) Tomato plant growth promotion and antibacterial related-mechanisms of four rhizobacterial Bacillus strains against Ralstonia solanacearum. Symbiosis 63:59–70
Andonian K, Hierro JL (2011) Species interactions contribute to the success of a global plant invader. Biol Invasions 13:2957–2965
Angelini P, Rubini A, Gigante D, Reale L, Pagiotti R, Venanzoni R (2012) The endophytic fungal communities associated with the leaves and roots of the common reed (Phragmites australis) in Lake Trasimeno (Perugia, Italy) in declining and healthy stands. Fungal Ecol 5:683–693
Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM, Newcombe G, Tharayil N, Chen S (2014) Fungal endophyte increases the allelopathic effects of an invasive. Forb Oecologia 175:285–91
Béchet M, Caradec T, Hussein W, Abderrahmani A, Chollet M, Leclère V, Dubois T, Lereclus D, Pupin M, Jacques P (2012) Structure, biosynthesis, and properties of kurstakins, nonribosomal lipopeptides from Bacillus spp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:593–600
Berg G, Müller H, Zachow C, Opelt K, Scherwinski K, Tilcher R, Ullrich A, Hallmann J, Grosch R, Sessitsch A (2008) Endophytes: structural and functional diversity and biotechnological applications in control of plant pathogens. Simbiogenetics 6:17–26
Berg G, Grube M, Schloter M, Smalla K (2014) Unraveling the plant microbiome: looking back and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 5:1–7
Borriss R, Chen X-H, Rueckert C, Blom J, Becker A, Baumgarth B, Fran B, Pukall R, Schumann P, Sproer C, Junge H, Vater J, Puhler A, Klenk H-P (2011) Relationship of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens clades associated with strains DSM 7T and FZB42T: a proposal for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens subsp. nov. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum subsp. nov. based on complete genome sequence comparisons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1768–1801
Buchoux S, Lai-Kee-Him J, Garnier M, Tsan P, Besson F, Brisson A, Dufourc EJ (2008) Surfactin-triggered small vesicle formation of negatively charged membranes: a novel membrane-lysis mechanism. Biophys J 95:3840–3849
Calheiros CSC, Pereira SFA, Brix H, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML (2016) Assessment of culturable bacterial endophytic communities colonizing Canna flaccida inhabiting a wastewater treatment constructed wetland. Ecol Eng. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.04.002
Callaway RM, Waller LP, Diaconu A, Pal R, Collins AR, Mueller-Schaerer H, Maron JL (2011) Escape from competition: neighbors reduce Centaurea stoebe performance at home but not away. Ecology 92:2208–2213
Carrim AJI, Barbosa EC, Vieira JDG (2006) Enzymatic activity of endophytic bacterial isolates of Jacaranda decurrens Cham (Carobinha-do-campo) Brazilian. Arch Biol Technol 49:353–359
Castanheira N, Dourado AC, Alves PI, Pallero-Cortés AM, Delgado-Rodríguez AI, Pazeres A, Borges N, Sánchez C, Crespo MTB, Fareleira P (2014) Annual ryegrass-associated bacteria with potential for plant growth promotion. Microbiol Res 169:768–779
Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Eisenreich A, Schneider K, Heinemeyer I, Borriss R (2007) Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth–promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat Biotechnol 25:1007–1014
Choi S-K, Jeong H, Kloepper JW, Ryu C-M (2014) Genome sequence of bacillus amyloliquefaciens GB03. Active ingredient of the first commercial biological control product. Genome Announc 2:1–2
Dabundo R, Lehmann MF, Treibergs L, Tobias CR, Altabet MA, Moisander PH, Granger J (2014) The contamination of commercial 15N2 gas stocks with 15N-labeled nitrate and ammonium and consequences for nitrogen fixation. Meas PloS one 9, e110335
Deleu M, Paquot M, Nylander T (2008) Effect of fengycin, a lipopeptide produced by Bacillus subtilis, on model membranes. Biophys J 94:2667–2679
Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient. Cycling Process Ecosyst 6:503–523
Ernst M, Mendgen KW, Wirsel SG (2003) Endophytic fungal mutualists: seedborne Stagonospora spp. enhance reed biomass production in a xenic microcosms. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16:580–587
Farzana K, Shah SN, Butt FB, Awan SB (2005) Biosynthesis of bacitracin in solid-state fermentation by Bacillus licheniformis using defatted oil seed cakes as substrate. Pak J Pharm Sci 18:55–57
Fer T, Hroudova Z (2009) Genetic diversity and dispersal of Phragmites australis in a small river system. Aquat Bot 90:165–171
Fischer MS, Rodriguez RJ (2013) Fungal endophytes of invasive Phragmites australis populations vary in species composition and fungicide susceptibility. Symbiosis 61:55–62
Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion. Low-Resource Syst Nat 446:1079–1081
Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100:1738–1750
González-Sánchez MA, Pérez-Jiménez RM, Pliego C, Ramos C, De Vicente A, Cazorla FM (2010) Biocontrol bacteria selected by a direct plant protection strategy against avocado white root rot show antagonism as a prevalent trait. J Appl Microbiol 109:65–78
Gumuscu B, Tekinay T (2013) Effective biodegradation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene using a novel bacterial strain isolated from TNT-contaminated soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 85:35–41
Hardy RW, Holsten RD, Jackson EK, Burns RC (1968) The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol 43:1185–1207
Hathout Y, Ho YP, Ryzhov V, Demirev P, Fenselau C (2000) Kurstakins: a new class of lipopeptides isolated from Bacillus thuringiensis. J Nat Prod 63:1492–1496
Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology Honolulu. The University Press of Hawaii, Hawaii
Hurek T, Reinhold B, Grimm B, Fendrik I, Niemann E-G (1988) Occurrence of effective nitrogen-scavenging bacteria in the rhizosphere of kallar grass. Plant Soil 110:339–348
Jordan NR, Larson DL, Huerd SC (2008) Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed grass prairies. Biol Invasions 10:177–190
Jourdan E, Henry G, Duby F, Dommes J, Barthélemy JP, Thonart P, Ongena M (2009) Insights into the defense-related events occurring in plant cells following perception of surfactin-type lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis. Plant-Microbe Interact 22:456–468
Kakar KU, Duan Y-P, Nawaz Z, Sun G, Almoneafy AA, Hassan MA, Elshakh A, Li B, Xie G-L (2013) A novel rhizobacterium Bk7 for biological control of brown sheath rot of rice caused by Pseudomonas fuscovaginae and its mode of action. Eur J Plant Pathol 137:1–16
Kawaguchi A, Sawada H, Ichinose Y (2008) Phylogenetic and serological analyses reveal genetic diversity of Agrobacterium vitis strains. Jpn Plant Pathol 57:747–753
Kim PI, Ryu J, Kim YH, Chi YT (2010) Production of biosurfactant lipopeptides Iturin A, fengycin and surfactin A from Bacillus subtilis CMB32 for control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:138–145
Kiraly KA, Pilinszky K, Bittsanszky A, Gyulai G, Kömives T (2013) Importance of ammonia detoxification by plants in phytoremediation and aquaponics. Alps-Adria Sci Workshop 12:100–102
Kowalski KP, Bacon CW, Bickford W, Braun H, Clay K, Leduc-Lapierre M, Lillard E, Melissa KM, Nelson E, Torres M, White J, Wilcox DA (2015) Advancing the science of microbial symbiosis to support invasive species management: a case study on Phragmites in the Great Lakes. Front Microbiol 6:1–14
Lamb TG, Tonkyn DW, Kluepfel DA (1996) Movement of Pseudomonas aureofaciens from the rhizosphere to aerial plant tissue can. J Microbiol 42:1112–1120
Leelasuphakul W, Hemmanee P, Chuenchitt S (2008) Growth inhibitory properties of Bacillus subtilis strains and their metabolites against the green mold pathogen (Penicillium digitatum Sacc) of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 48:113–121
Leishman MR, Thomson VP, Cooke J (2010) Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. J Ecol 98:28–42
Li YH, Zhu JN, Zhai ZH, Zhang Q (2010) Endophytic bacterial diversity in roots of Phragmites australis in constructed Beijing Cuihu wetland (China). FEMS Microbiol Lett 309:84–93
Li HY, Li DW, He CM, Zhou ZP, Mei T, Xu HM (2012) Diversity and heavy metal tolerance of endophytic fungi from six dominant plant species in a Pb–Zn mine wasteland. China Fungal Ecol 5:309–315
Li YH, Zhu JN, Liu QF, Liu Y, Liu L, Zhang Q (2013) Comparison of the diversity of root associated bacteria in Phragmites australis and Typhaangus- tifolia L in artificial wetlands. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:1499–1508
Lima JVL, Weber OB, Correia D, Soares MA, Senabio JA (2015) Endophytic bacteria in cacti native to a Brazilian semi-arid region. Plant Soil 389:25–33
Lissner J, Schierup HH, Comin FA, Astorga V (1999) Effect of climate on the salt tolerance of two Phragmites australis populations I Growth, inorganic solutes, nitrogen relations and osmoregulation. Aquat Bot 64:317–333
Lissner J, Schierup HH, Comin FA, Astorga V (1999) Effect of climate on the salt tolerance of two Phragmites australis populations II Diurnal CO2 exchange and transpiration. Aquat Bot 64:335–350
Lopez BR, Bashan Y, Bacilio M, Cruz-Agüero G (2009) Rock colonizing plants: abundance of the endemic cactus Mammillaria fraileana related to rock type in the southern Sonoran desert. Plant Ecol 201:575–588
Ma B, Lv XF, Warren A, Gong J (2013) Shifts indiversity and community structure of endophytic Bacteria and Achaea across root, stem and leaf tissues in the common reed, Phragmites australis, along a salinity gradient in a marine tidal wetland of northern China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:759–768
Magnet-Dana R, Thimon L, Peypoux F, Ptak M (1992) Surfactin/iturin A interactions may explain the synergistic effect of surfactin on the biological properties of iturin. A Biochimie 74:1047–1051
Mano H, Tanaka F, Nakamura C, Kaga H, Morisaki H (2007) Culturable endophytic bacterial flora of the maturing leaves and roots of rice plants (Oryza sativa) cultivated in a paddy field. Microbes Environ 22:175–185
Marquez-Santacruz HA, Hernandez-Leon R, Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Velazquez-Sepulveda I, Santoyo G (2010) Diversity of bacterial endophytes in roots of Mexican husk tomato plants (Physalis ixocarpa) and their detection in the rhizosphere. Gen Mol Res 9:2372–2380
Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K, Windham L, Kiviat E, Findlay S (2000) A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:89–103
Meyerson LA, Lambertini C, McCormick M, Whigham D (2012) Hybridization of common reed in North America? The answer is blowing in the wind. AoB Plants pls022
Mozdzer TJ, Zieman JC, McGlathery KJ (2010) Nitrogen uptake by native and invasive temperate coastal macrophytes: importance of dissolved organic nitrogen. Estuar Coasts 33:784–797
Mozdzer TJ, Megonigal JP (2012) Jack-and-master trait responses to elevated CO2 and N: a comparison of native and Introduced. Phragmites Australis PLoS ONE 7, e42794
Norris JR, Chapman HM (1968) Classification of Azotobacter. In: Gibbs BM, Shapto DA (eds) Trends in identification methods for microbiologists. Academic Press London, New York, pp 19–27
Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–25
Patel H, Tscheka C, Edwards K, Karlsson G, Heerkotz H (2011) All-or none membrane permeabilization by fengycin-type lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis. QST713 Biochim Biophys Acta 1808: 2000–2008
Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Rentsch D, Robatzek S, Webb R, Sagulenko E, Nasholm T, Schmidt S, Lonhienne T (2010) Turning the table: plants consume microbes as a source of nutrients. PLoS One 5(7), e11915
Perez-Garcia O, Escalante FM, de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2011) Heterotrophic cultures of microalgae: metabolism and potential products. Water Res 45:11–36
Pohjanen J, Koskimäki JJ, Pirttilä AM (2014) Interactions of meristem-associated endophytic bacteria. In: Verma VC, Gange AC (eds) Advances in endophytic research. New Delhi, Springer India, pp 103–113
Qiao JQ, Wu HJ, Huo R, Gao XW, Borriss R (2014) Stimulation of plant growth and biocontrol by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42 engineered for improved action. Chem Biol Technol Agric 1:12
Raaijmakers JM, De Bruijn I, Nybroe O, Ongena M (2010) Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and Pseudomonas: more than surfactants and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:1037–1062
Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2006) Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol 170:445–457
Rengel Z, Marschner P (2005) Nutrient availability and management in the rhizosphere: exploiting genotypic differences. New Phytol 168:305–312
Rodriguez R, White JF, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182:314–330
Rout ME, Chrzanowski TH (2009) The invasive Sorghum halepense harbors endophytic n2-fixing bacteria and alters soil biogeochemistry. Plant Soil 315:163–172
Saltonstall K, Peterson PM, Soreng RJ (2004) Recognition of Phragmites australis subsp americanus (Poaceae:Arundinoideae). North America: evidence from morphological and genetic analyses SIDA. Cont Bot 21:683–692
Sauvêtre A, Schröder P (2015) Up take of carbamazepine by rhizomes and endophytic bacteria of Phragmites australis. Front Plant Sci 6:1–11
Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC (2006) What are endophytes? In: Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13
Suman A, Shrivastava AK, Gaur A, Singh P, Singh J, Yadav RL (2008) Nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane in relation to its BNF potential and population of endophytic diazotrophs at different n levels. Plant Growth Regul 54:1–11
Sylvester-Bradley R, Asakawa N, Torraca SLA, Magalhaes FMM, Oliveira LA, Pereira RM (1982) Levantamento quantitativo de microrganismos solubilizadores de fosfatos na rizosfera de gramíneas e leguminosas forrageiras na Amazônia. Acta Amazon 12:15–22
Thimon L, Peypoux F, Wallach J, Michel G (1995) Effect of the lipopeptide antibiotic, iturin A, on morphology and membrane ultrastructure of yeast cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 128:101–106
Uchytil RJ (1992) Phragmites australis. IOP: US, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Fire Effects Information System http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/graminoid/phraus/all.html. Accessed 03 Mar 2016
Van der Putten WH, Klironomos JN, Wardle DA, (2007) Microbial ecology of biological invasions ISME J 1: 28–37
Wang CY, Xiao HG, Liu J, Wang L, Du DL (2015) Insights into ecological effects of invasive plants on soil nitrogen cycles American. J Plant Sci 6:34–46
Weidenhamer JD, Li M, Allman J, Bergosh RG, Posner M (2013) Evidence does not support a role for gallic acid in Phragmites australis invasion success. J Chem Ecol 39:323–332
White JF, Chen Q, Torres MS, Mattera R, Irizarry Tadych M, Bergen M (2015) Collaboration between grass seedlings and rhizobacteria to scavenge organic nitrogen in soils. AoB Plants 7: plu093
White JF, Torres MS, Somu MP, Johnson H, Irizarry I, Chen Q, Zhang N, Walsh E, Tadych M, Bergen MS (2014) Hydrogen peroxide staining to visualize intracellular bacterial infections of seedling root cells. Microsc Res Tech 77:566–573
Xu J, Zhang J, Zhao C, Li C, Xie H, Wang S (2012) Effect of ammonia stress on physiological and biochemical character of Phragmites australis. Constructed wetland Third International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation 343–346
Yuan J, Raza W, Huang Q, Shen Q (2012) The ultrasound-assisted extraction and identification of antifungal substances from B amyloliquefaciens strain NJN-6 suppressing Fusarium oxysporum J. Basic Microbiol 52:721–730
Yuan J, Ruan Y, Wang B, Zhang J, Waseem R, Huang Q, Shen Q (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6-enriched bio-organic fertilizer suppressed Fusarium wilt and promoted the growth of banana plants. J Agric Food Chem 61:3774–3780
Zhang YF, He LY, Chen ZJ, Wang QY, Qian M, Sheng XF (2011) Characterization of ACC deaminase-producing endophytic bacteria isolated from copper-tolerant plants and their potential in promoting the growth and copper accumulation of brassica napus. Chemosphere 83:57–62
Zhao ZZ, Wang QS, Wang KM, Brain K, Liu CH, Gu YC (2010) Study of the antifungal activity of Bacillus vallismortis ZZ185 in vitro and identification of its antifungal components. Bioresour Technol 101:292–297
Zhao P, Quan C, Jin L, Wang L, Wang J, Fan S (2013) Effects of critical medium components on the production of antifungal lipopeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Q-426 exhibiting excellent biosurfactant properties. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:401–409
Zinniel DK, Lambrecht P, Harris NB, Feng Z, Kuczmarski D, Higley P, Ishimaru C, Arunakumari A, Barletta RG, Vidaver AK (2002) Isolation and characterization of endophytic colonizing bacteria from agronomic crops and prairie plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(5):2198–2208
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for funding and other support to the US Geological Survey, the John E. and Christina C. Craighead Foundation, USDA-NIFA Multistate Project W3147, The New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, The Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Department of Plant Biology and Pathology of Rutgers University, The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for Post Doctoral Fellowship, and the International Institute of Science and Technology in Wetlands (INAU). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. This article is a contribution of the USGS Great Lakes Science Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Electronic Supplementary Material Table 1
Primers for PCR detection of biosynthetic genes for antimicrobial lipopeptides and microorganism identification (DOCX 20 kb)
Electronic Supplementary Material Table 2
PCR screening and identity of biosynthetic genes for antimicrobial lipopeptides (DOCX 21 kb)
Electronic Supplementary Material Table 3
Assignments of selected m/z peaks observed in mass spectra of antimicrobial peptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens A9a (DOCX 21 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soares, M.A., Li, HY., Kowalski, K.P. et al. Functional Role of Bacteria from Invasive Phragmites australis in Promotion of Host Growth. Microb Ecol 72, 407–417 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0793-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0793-x