Abstract
Estuaries are sinks for various anthropogenic contaminants, such as petroleum hydrocarbons, giving rise to significant environmental concern. The demand for organisms and processes capable of degrading pollutants in a clean, effective, and less expensive process is of great importance. Phytoremedition approaches involving plant/bacteria interactions have been explored as an alternative, and halophyte vegetation has potential for use in phytoremedition of hydrocarbon contamination. Studies with plant species potentially suitable for microbe-assisted phytoremediation are widely represented in scientific literature. However, the in-depth understanding of the biological processes associated with the re-introduction of indigenous bacteria and plants and their performance in the degradation of hydrocarbons is still the limiting step for the application of these bioremediation solutions in a field context. The intent of the present review is to summarize the sources and effects of hydrocarbon contamination in estuarine environments, the strategies currently available for bioremediation (potential and limitations), and the perspectives of the use of halophyte plants in microbe-assisted phytoremediation approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Salt marshes are complex coastal environments usually situated within estuarine systems. They represent dynamic habitats, developing along the coast line and inside estuaries and are characterized by high concentration of soluble salts (prevailing NaCl), relatively low diversity of species, and high biomass productivity [1, 2]. Estuarine salt marshes are among the most productive ecosystems on Earth [3] promoting plant and microbial activity [4–6], representing a preferential habitat for many organisms (fish, bird, and other wildlife) [7, 8] and providing important ecosystem services [9]. Salt marshes are highly dynamic areas, influenced by the joint action of water, sediment, and vegetation, providing a buffer zone between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in urban and industrial areas. They contribute to flood control and erosion prevention and may act as protective filters and final repositories for runoff pollutants, pathogens, and nutrients [1, 9, 10].
Salt marshes are sinks for various pollutants (e.g., metal and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon), receiving important anthropogenic inputs from urban areas, industries, and agricultural compounds, namely, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), and hexachlorodimethanonaphthalene (Dieldrin), as summarized in Table 1. Due to their ecological importance, the cleanup and recovery of these ecosystems is an issue of public concern.
Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) represent one of the most common groups of persistent organic pollutants in coastal and estuarine systems [22]. They are continuously released, persistent in the environment, toxic to many organism, and hazardous to human health [24]. This class of contaminants may be originated from industrial release products or from accidental spills [24]. Numerous studies indicate that salt marsh sediments are capable of retaining PHs and that the stimulation of microbial activity in the rhizosphere of plants can accelerate their biodegradation [25, 26]. Phytoremediation is one of the processes of hydrocarbon bioremediation, which has been intensively studied in the last decade. The continuous release of hydrocarbons and their degradation products caused by anthropogenic activities around estuary areas leads to the necessity for efficient, inexpensive, and environmental friendly processes of hydrocarbon decontamination, such as phytoremedition. In that perspective, the interactions between halophytes, plants capable of growing in salt marshes, and their root-associated bacteria may play a relevant role in the remediation of contaminated areas. Cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches together with molecular approaches have been used to characterize plant–hydrocarbonclastic bacteria partnerships in the perspective of their exploitation for microbe-assisted phytoremediation. However, particular features of salt marsh ecosystems may impose difficulties in the process of implementation of these strategies in the field, and considerable research effort has been directed to a deeper understanding of halophyte-microbe interactions in oil-polluted environments.
The purpose of this paper is to summarize recent knowledge on the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in salt marsh sediments and to critically discuss the potential and limitations of microbe-assisted phytoremediation approaches for the recovery of oil-impacted ecosystems.
Hydrocarbons
Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) are common environmental contaminants and represent a serious problem in many parts of world [27–32], particularly in coastal and estuarine systems which may become seriously affected [33–35]. They are the principal components in a range of commercial products (e.g., gasoline, fuel oils, lubricating oils, solvents, mineral spirits, mineral oils, and crude oil). Petroleum products are a complex mixture of hundreds of hydrocarbon compounds, including various amounts of aliphatic and aromatic molecules. They enter and spread through the environment in many different ways [24]. Certain petroleum hydrocarbons are directly released in the water column, forming surface films while others tend to accumulate in the sediment.
PAHs are widespread in air, soil, sediment, surface water, groundwater, and runoff and are also found to accumulate in plants and aquatic organism [36–38]. In estuarine environments, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are of great concern due to their potential for bioaccumulation, persistence, transport, toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity [36, 39–41]. These compounds are introduced into estuarine environments from different sources and by a variety of processes (Fig. 1). Although PAHs are ubiquitous in the environment (fossil fuels, brush fires, volcanoes, and burning natural vegetation), anthropogenic activities, such as petroleum refining and transport activities dependent on the combustion of fossil fuels, are the major contributors to their release in the environment [39–42].
PAHs are classified as low molecular weight (LMW) and high molecular weight (HMW) according to the number and type of rings they have in the structure [43]. Based on their abundance and toxicity, 16 PAHs have been included in the list of priority pollutants of the US Soil Protection Agency [44]. Because of their high hydrophobicity and low lability, the process of PAHs remediation, especially in soils and sediments, is generally slow and expensive. The fate of PAHs in the environment depends on abiotic and biotic processes such as stabilization, landfarming (stimulation of indigenous microorganisms in the soil by providing nutrients, water, and oxygen), steam and thermal heating, chemical oxidation, bioremediation (bioaugmentation and biostimulation), and phytoremedition, which have been applied to the restoration of groundwater and soils/sediments [40, 45].
Phytoremediation of Hydrocarbons
Halophytes are defined as plants capable of completing their life cycle in salt concentrations around 0.200 M NaCl or even higher [46]. Moreover, many of these plants inhabit environments subject to constant flooding (e.g., coastal mangroves and salt marshes) [47]. Because estuaries and coastal habitats are highly exposed to environmental contamination, many studies addressed the use of halophytes in the phytoremediation of many pollutants (e.g., heavy metals, xenobiotics, and PHs) [48–52]. The physiological mechanisms that these plants use to tolerate salts are partly analogous to those involved in heavy metal resistance. Therefore, halophyte plants can accumulate metals, being therefore regarded as promising candidates for the removal or stabilization of heavy metals in polluted soils [53].
According to the fate of the contaminant or to the mechanism by which plants remediate contamination, these approaches are referred to as phytoextraction, rhyzofiltration, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, phytodegradation, or rhizodegradation [54, 55]. Phytoextraction refers to the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of contaminants in the soil by plant roots into aboveground components of the plants. This technique involves the introduction of plants referred to as hyperaccumulators in polluted sites that after grown, are harvested. So, phytoextraction involves the repeated cropping of plants in contaminated soil until contaminant concentration decreases to acceptable levels. After harvesting, contaminated biomass needs treatments prior to disposal that can pass to secure landfills, incineration, or more recently thermo-chemical conversion processes (combustion, gasification, and pyrolysis) [56]. Rhyzofiltration involves the absorption or adsorption of contaminants through roots or other plant parts [54, 55]. In phytostabilization, plants reduce the bioavailability of contaminants immobilizing them in soil/sediment, reducing the mobility of contaminants and preventing migration to water or air [54, 55]. For the removal of low molecular weight compounds from soil, phytovolatilization is used. In this technique, plants volatilize contaminants that are biologically converting to gaseous species and releasing them through leaves via evapotranspiration process [54, 55]. Organic contaminants such as petroleum, PAHs, BTEX, TNT, chlorinated solvents, and pesticides are degraded only by plants (phytodegradation) or by microorganism and plants, in a process denominated as rhizodegradation [55].
Comparatively with application for the sequestration or removal of metals, studies involving halophytes for phytoremedition of PHs are still rather scarce. However, species of Spartina, Salicornia, Juncus, Halonemum, Halimione, and Scirpus have been tested for the remediation of hydrocarbons in wetlands with encouraging results (Table 2). The ability for PAH bioaccumulation was described for Salicornia fragilis shoots by a process of soil-to-plant transference that is dependent of exposure duration and pollution degree. High molecular weight PAHs were detected in aerial parts of the plant [58]. In a study conducted in greenhouse conditions, the use of Juncus roemerianus transplanted to salt marsh sediment contaminated with different diesel oil dosages was tested. The results revealed the reduction of PHs in J. roemerianus treatments, in relation to control sediments, suggesting that these plants may simultaneously contribute to the restoration and remediation of diesel-contaminated wetlands. Phytoremediation by J. roemerianus was even more effective for PAHs than for n-alkanes [48]. In an outdoor laboratory experiment (microcosm-scale), the potential of the salt marsh plants Halimione portulacoides, Scirpus maritimus, and Juncus maritimus for the remediation of soil contaminated with refinery waste was tested. Moreover, two situations are tested: (i) the use of each individual plant species or the use of an association of two plants (S. maritimus and J. maritimus) and (ii) soil with old contamination (crude oil) or a mixture of the old and recent (turbine oil) contamination. Combined transplants of S. maritimus and H. portulacoides plants were efficient in removing not only all the recent and old contamination, and the process was faster and more efficient than natural attenuation [49].
Despite existing evidence that the halophytes can be used successfully for the phytoremediation of estuarine areas, such as oil- or diesel-polluted sites (Table 2), there are still some limitations to the extensive use of this bioremediation approach. The efficiency of halophytes, as phytoremedition agents, depends on the plant species. For example, a comparative study of the efficiency of the salt marsh species H. portulacoides, S. maritimus, and J. maritimus for remediation of PHs revealed that plant species is determinant in the rate of hydrocarbon clearance and, more importantly, that different associations between these plants can interfere with or even inhibit the process [49].
Microbial Hydrocarbon Degradation
Contrasting with the prospective character of the use halophytes, the use of microorganisms for the clearance of hydrocarbons in the environment has long been regarded with interest. Through microbial activity, hydrocarbons are converted into carbon dioxide, water, and living biomass [60]. A diversity of bacteria, fungi, and algae has been characterized as to their capacity to degrade PAHs [36].
Microorganisms have been found to degrade PAHs via different catabolic pathways, such as anaerobic or aerobic metabolism, or co-metabolism which is important for the degradation of mixtures of PAHs and high molecular weight PAHs [38, 61, 62]. The initial step in aerobic metabolism of PAHs usually occurs via the incorporation of oxygen into aromatic rings followed by the systematic breakdown of the compound to PAHs metabolites and/or carbon dioxide. Anaerobic metabolism occurs via hydrogenation of aromatic rings [40, 62]. In co-metabolism, the range and extent of high molecular weight PAH degradation is influenced by an important interaction that transforms the non-growth substrate (PAHs) in the presence of growth substrates [62].
Physicochemical factors, such as soil type and structure, pH, temperature, electron acceptors, and nutrients, will affect microbial activity and determine the persistence of hydrocarbons (such PAHs) in polluted environments (Table 3). In estuarine areas, such as salt marshes, salinity fluctuations represent one of major challenges for hydrocarbon degradation that may even compromise the overall success of the process. There is an inverse relation between salinity and hydrocarbon solubility, with the consequent inhibitory effect of salinity on hydrocarbon bioremediation [71]. However, successful hydrocarbon degradation has been reported over a wide range of salinity values. A consortium of bacteria isolated from oil-contaminated sediments demonstrated the highest rate of hydrocarbon degradation with a salinity of 0.4 M NaCl, and the degradation was attenuated below and above this limit [72]. In a study with two bacterial consortia isolated from crude oil and mangrove sediments, the highest rate of degradation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons occurred in a salinity range between 0 and 0.171 M and decreased with increasing salinity [73]. Riis [74] reported diesel fuel degradation by microbial communities from saline soils in Patagonia up to a salinity of 2.997 M. Although hydrocarbon contamination is still persistent and recalcitrant in its nature, the fact that microbes from vegetated saline sediments can still actively degrade hydrocarbons in the presence of variable and relatively high concentrations of salt opens promising perspectives for microbe-assisted phytoremediation in estuarine areas.
Microbe-Assisted Phytoremediation
The microbial communities associated with plants and plant-microbe interactions established between them have a significant role in the physiology and health of the plant, exerted through inhibition of phytopatogens (e.g., antibiotic and siderophore production or nutrient competition), release of growth-promoting molecules, enhancement of nutrient availability, promotion of detoxification (e.g., sequestration, volatilization, and degradation of pollutants), and improvement of stress tolerance by induction of systematic acquired host resistance (Fig. 2).
The use of plants and their associated microorganisms for the removal of contaminants from the environment is based on the increase of microbial population numbers in the rhizosphere and/or endosphere and on the stimulation of their metabolic activity [75]. So, microbe-assisted phytoremedition represents a powerful emerging approach to sequester, degrade, transform, assimilate, metabolize, or detoxify contaminants from soil, sediment, or groundwater [54, 76].
Numerous bacteria found in association with plants are capable of degrading hydrocarbons, namely, PAHs, suggesting that indigenous rhizobacteria and endophytic bacteria may have potential for bioremediation of polluted sites [77]. In the particular case of estuarine environments, a diversity of hydrocarbon-degrading microbial populations has been found in association with the rhizosphere of salt marsh plants, where they actively contribute to hydrocarbon removal and degradation [23, 26]. The use of rhizosphere and phyllosphere (aerial portion of plants) of the halophyte Halonemum strobilaceum was also proposed for phytoremediation of oil-polluted hypersaline environments, via rhizosphere technology [59].
Rhizodegradation appears to be a particularly interesting phytoremediation process for the removal and/or degradation of organic contaminants, such as PH. The rhizosphere is defined as a zone directly influenced by plant root system. Plants provide root exudates rich in carbon sources, nutrients, enzymes, and sometimes oxygen, creating a favorable environment in which microbial activity is stimulated [75, 78, 79]. However, microbial interactions with plants are not limited to the rhizosphere; rather, they extend to the interior of the plant [80]. Endophytic-assisted phytoremedition, involving microorganisms that are capable of living within various plant tissues (roots, stems, and leaves), has been reported in recent years as successful in the degradation of some pollutants, such as explosives, herbicides, and hydrocarbons [77, 81, 82]. In fact, remediation of hydrocarbons by combined use of plants and rhizobacteria and endophytic bacteria have been widely described (Table 4). Genetically engineered endophyte microorganisms enhance the overall health of theirs hosts [92] and may indirectly improve biodegradation of contaminants in the rhizosphere. Experiments in which pea plants were inoculated with the naphthalene degrader Pseudomonas putida VM1441 (pNAH7) and exposed to naphthalene contamination revealed that naphthalene degradation rate (~40 %), seed germination, and plant transpiration were enhanced in inoculated plants than in non-inoculated controls. Moreover, inoculation resulted in an overall protection of the host plants from the phytotoxic effects of naphthalene [85]. A study carried out in a mangrove showed that nursery conditions and early microbial colonization patterns had long-term effect on the rhizosphere of transplanted mangroves. This phenomenon may have potential application for introducing new rhizocompetent bacteria carrying genes or plasmids to improve plant growth or bioremediation purpose (rhizoengineering) [93].
Several studies reported the enhancement of PH degradation in association with the presence of bacteria carrying PH degradation genes (Table 4). A high diversity of hydrocarbon degradative genes, such as alkane monooxygenase (alkB), naphthalene dioxygenase (ndoB), phenanthrene dioxygenase (phnAc), and cytochrome P450 alkane hydroxylase, has been detected in plant microhabitats (rhizosphere and endosphere) [82, 84, 85]. In fact, the monitoring of gene abundance and expression during phytoremedition of contaminated sites can give indications about the persistence and functional activity of inoculated microorganisms [94]. A study conducted at a long-term phytoremediation field site revealed that both rhizosphere and endophytic communities showed substantial interspecies variation in hydrocarbon degradation potential and activity levels, with an increase in catabolic genotypes in specific plant treatments [82].
Recently, it was suggested that for certain phytoremedition approaches, it may be essential or at least important that bacteria also act as plant growth promoters, in addition to their pollutant-degrading activity. In experiments with Italian ryegrass, plant biomass production and alkane degradation were significantly enhanced by inoculation with bacterial strains expressing hydrocarbon-degrading genes (e.g., alkB) as well as plant-promoting activity (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity) [90, 95]. So, the combined use of plant and bacteria can be exploited to relieve plant stress, and enhance bioremediation of PH-contaminated sites.
Current Limitations to the Microbe-Assisted Phytoremediation of Hydrocarbons
Microbe-assisted phytoremediation has been broadly tested for the degradation or sequestration of hydrocarbons in estuarine environments. Despite being considered an inexpensive, sustainable, and environment-friendly technique, phytoremedition is not exempt of controversy, and the success of this type of approach is significantly affected by environmental factors and particular features of each ecosystem. One major limitation is time, considering that successful phytoremediation is a process that goes on for long periods which is partially determined by the slow growth and phenological (or life) cycle of plants, the limited depth of root system, and the fact that many plant species are sensitive to the contaminants that are being remediated [75, 96].
The bioavailability of petroleum hydrocarbons is another important factor in the success of bioremediation, and it can be significantly affected by soil type and organic matter content. Water content (affects the availability of oxygen required for aerobic respiration), temperature, and nutrient availability (influences the rate and extent of biodegradation) are relevant determinants of the efficiency of the PH bioremediation process [78]. The competition for nutrients between plants and microorganisms can be a restriction to the remediation efficiency. A reduction in microbial abundance and an attenuation of degradation of higher molecular weight PAHs in sediments were observed in H. portulacoides banks, and this effect was associated to nutrient limitation [22]. Therefore, fertilization may be required for optimal rhizoremediation of hydrocarbons.
Although a wide range of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria have been isolated from contaminated environments, little is known about the stability of the association with salt marsh plants and the success of the re-introduction of plant-bacteria systems for potential phytoremediation processes in saline sediments. The fact that these biotopes are colonized in a particular type of plants, well adapted to flooding and to salinity fluctuations, reinforces the need to incorporate basic knowledge on their interaction with sediment microbes in the design of phytoremediation approaches. The ability to monitor the survival and efficiency of hydrocarbon degradation of inoculated strains is essential for the in-depth understanding of the network of relations established between sediments, plants, and microbes that underlies microbe-assisted phytoremediation.
Monitoring Plant-Bacteria Interactions Involved in Microbe-Assisted Phytoremediation
The efficient colonization of plants by microbial pollutant degraders is an essential contribution for plant survival and hydrocarbon degradation [90, 97]. Despite the lack of knowledge on inoculation and bacterial colonization of halophyte plants, the monitoring of plant-bacteria interaction in hydrocarbon-polluted sites has been addressed by different approaches. In bioremediation, the use of culture-dependent methodologies, such as dilution plating on agar plates containing antibiotics, the most-probable-number (MPN) method, and direct counting, are insufficient for an accurate and sensitive monitoring of the inoculation and colonization processes [98]. Molecular techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR, and DNA hybridization, reporter genes, or genetically marker microorganisms (biomarkers) have been used to check on microbe survival, efficiency of colonization, and activity [77, 90, 94, 99, 100]. For example, antibiotic resistance and green fluorescent protein (gfp) genes have been proposed as useful tools for monitoring the colonization of bacterial endophytes, inoculated in poplar trees [100]. Endophyte colonization has also been monitored with the use of gusA marker gene encoding the enzyme β-glucuronidase. A gus-marked strain, Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN, was inoculated in seeds of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). B. phytofirmans PsJN:gusA10 revealed that this bacterium has the ability to colonize the rhizosphere and endosphere of ryegrass vegetation in a diesel-contaminated soil and generally improved plant biomass production and hydrocarbon degradation [101]. Other study, using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), showed that Enterobacter ludwigii strains were able to efficiently colonize the rhizosphere and endosphere of Italian ryegrass, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa. Moreover, E. ludwigii strains contain a cytochrome-P450-type alkane hydroxylase (CYP153), and the quantification and expression of these genes by real-time PCR indicate an active role in hydrocarbon degradation, in the rhizosphere and endosphere of all three plant species [95]. Quantitative PCR has emerged as a useful and rapid tool for monitoring catabolic genes during bioremediation processes. As an example, this technique was used for the assessment of hydrocarbon degradation activity of Nocardia sp. H17-1 during remediation of crude-contaminated soil [102]. A similar approach was used to demonstrate that hydrocarbon degradation was associated with functional changes in microbial communities, in which high copy numbers of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase and naphthalene dioxygenase correlated with PAH mineralization [103].
Metagenomic pyrosequencing, which allows the recovery of a very large number of microbial sequences directly from environmental samples, has more recently emerged as a powerful technique to follow plant-microbe interactions during the bioremediation process [104, 105]. The sequences obtained can be compared with reference libraries, and then taxa present in an environmental sample can be identified with high confidence. The massive data sets generated provide information that can be used for a variety of applications, such as the comprehensive understanding of within-site and between-site variability of microbial communities and the impact of this variability in ecosystem-scale processes in salt marshes [106]. The pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene fragments of different Phragmites australis rhizospheres revealed a trend in the variation of bacterial community structure during wetland degradation and identified sulfur and sulfate-reducing bacteria, nitrifying and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and methane-oxidizing bacteria as crucial in the protection and ecological restoration of wetlands [107]. Recent bioremediation studies have used pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA gene to describe microbial community dynamics in hydrocarbon-contaminated sites, thus providing basis for the development of strategies for monitoring remediation processes [108, 109]. For example, the relative abundance of Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, and Euryarchaeota was directly correlated with the presence of diesel [109].
Future Perspectives
Despite numerous limitations, phytoremediation and, particularly, microbe-assisted phytoremediation have undeniable advantages, and research must now specifically address the aspects that can allow the scaling up from laboratory to the field for the practical implementation of this approach.
Each salt marsh displays particularly biological, chemical, and physical characteristics that will ultimately determine the success of phytoremediation. Therefore, field studies, combined with laboratory approaches, are required for the understanding of the interplay of biological and chemical processes involved in microbe-assisted phytoremediation of oil-impacted sites.
Considering that plant-microbe interactions play a key role in the process of environment and in planta detoxification, (a) the identification of autochthonous hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial populations associated to salt marsh plants (rhizosphere and aboveground plant tissues), (b) the identification of degradative plasmids, and (c) the selection of petroleum-resistant plants are key issues for the success of environmental restoration. The detection of genes related to hydrocarbon degradation pathways in halophyte plants can be useful to screen for lineages of plants that can be used in efficient phytoremediation protocols. Moreover, these genes can be used for the genetic engineered design of plants for novel phytoremediation approaches for hydrocarbon-polluted wetlands and soils [110]. Recent plant biotechnology approaches involving the introduction of specialized bacterial endophytes in plants or the design of genetically engineered plants containing interesting bacterial genes [92, 111] create new perspectives for future phytoremedition protocols. Endophytic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria may have a growth-promoting effect on the wild salt marsh halophyte plants and may be regarded as promising when field microbe-assisted phytoremediation approaches are envisaged.
References
Vernberg FJ (1993) Salt‐marsh processes: a review. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:2167–2195
Baptista I, Santos AL, Cunha Â, Gomes N, Almeida A (2011) Bacterial biomass production in an estuarine system: high variability of leucine conversion factors and changes in bacterial community structure during incubation. Aquat Microb Ecol 62:299–310
Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’neill RV, Paruelo J (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260
Santos L, Cunha A, Silva H, Cacador I, Dias JM, Almeida A (2007) Influence of salt marsh on bacterial activity in two estuaries with different hydrodynamic characteristics (Ria de Aveiro and Tagus Estuary). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60:429–441. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00304.x
Oliveira V, Santos A, Coelho F, Gomes N, Silva H, Almeida A, Cunha  (2010) Effects of monospecific banks of salt marsh vegetation on sediment bacterial communities. Microbial Ecol 60:167–179. doi:10.1007/s00248-010-9678-6
Cunha M, Pedro R, Almeida M, Silva M (2005) Activity and growth efficiency of heterotrophic bacteria in a salt marsh (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). Microbiol Res 160:279–290
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol Econ 35:25–33
Watts AW, Ballestero TP, Gardner KH (2006) Uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in salt marsh plants Spartina alterniflora grown in contaminated sediments. Chemosphere 62:1253–1260. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.006
Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169
Valiela I, Rutecki D, Fox S (2004) Salt marshes: biological controls of food webs in a diminishing environment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300:131–159
Sanger D, Holland A, Scott G (1999) Tidal creek and salt marsh sediments in South Carolina coastal estuaries: II. Distribution of organic contaminants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 37:458–471
McGee BL, Fisher DJ, Yonkos LT, Ziegler GP, Turley S (1999) Assessment of sediment contamination, acute toxicity, and population viability of the estuarine amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus in Baltimore Harbor, Maryland, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2151–2160
O’Day PA, Carroll SA, Randall S, Martinelli RE, Anderson SL, Jelinski J, Knezovich JP (2000) Metal speciation and bioavailability in contaminated estuary sediments, Alameda Naval Air Station, California. Environ Sci Technol 34:3665–3673
Lee S, Cundy A (2001) Heavy metal contamination and mixing processes in sediments from the Humber Estuary, Eastern England. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 53:619–636
Fox WM, Connor L, Copplestone D, Johnson MS, Leah RT (2001) The organochlorine contamination history of the Mersey estuary, UK, revealed by analysis of sediment cores from salt marshes. Mar Environ Res 51:213–227
Fitzgerald E, Caffrey J, Nesaratnam S, McLoughlin P (2003) Copper and lead concentrations in salt marsh plants on the Suir Estuary, Ireland. Environ Pollut 123:67–74
Hung GA, Chmura GL (2006) Mercury accumulation in surface sediments of salt marshes of the Bay of Fundy. Environ Pollut 142:418–431
Vane C, Harrison I, Kim A (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sediments from the Mersey Estuary, UK. Sci Total Environ 374:112–126
Valega M, Lillebo AI, Pereira ME, Cacador I, Duarte AC, Pardal MA (2008) Mercury in salt marshes ecosystems: Halimione portulacoides as biomonitor. Chemosphere 73:1224–1229. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.053
Martins M, Ferreira AM, Vale C (2008) The influence of Sarcocornia fruticosa on retention of PAHs in salt marsh sediments (Sado estuary, Portugal). Chemosphere 71:1599–1606. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.054
Zhang W, Feng H, Chang J, Qu J, Xie H, Yu L (2009) Heavy metal contamination in surface sediments of Yangtze River intertidal zone: an assessment from different indexes. Environ Pollut 157:1533–1543
Mucha AP, Almeida CMR, Magalhães CM, Vasconcelos MTSD, Bordalo AA (2011) Salt marsh plant–microorganism interaction in the presence of mixed contamination. Int Biodeter Biodegr 65:326–333. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.12.005
Ribeiro H, Mucha AP, Almeida CMR, Bordalo AA (2011) Hydrocarbon degradation potential of salt marsh plant–microorganisms associations. Biodegradation 22:729–739
Todd GD, Chessin RL, Colman J (1999) Toxicological profile for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta
Carman KR, Means JC, Pomarico SC (1996) Response of sedimentary bacteria in a Louisiana salt marsh to contamination by diesel fuel. Aquat Microb Ecol 10:231–241. doi:10.3354/ame010231
Daane LL, Harjono I, Zylstra GJ, Haggblom MM (2001) Isolation and characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of salt marsh plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2683–2691. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.6.2683-2691.2001
Vázquez S, Nogales B, Ruberto L, Hernández E, Christie-Oleza J, Balbo AL, Bosch R, Lalucat J, Mac Cormack W (2009) Bacterial community dynamics during bioremediation of diesel oil-contaminated Antarctic soil. Microbial Ecol 57:598–610
Yergeau E, Arbour M, Brousseau R, Juck D, Lawrence JR, Masson L, Whyte LG, Greer CW (2009) Microarray and real-time PCR analyses of the responses of high-arctic soil bacteria to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation treatments. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6258–6267
Labbe D, Margesin R, Schinner F, Whyte LG, Greer CW (2007) Comparative phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities in pristine and hydrocarbon‐contaminated Alpine soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:466–475
Santos HF, Carmo FL, Paes JE, Rosado AS, Peixoto RS (2011) Bioremediation of mangroves impacted by petroleum. Water Air Soil Pollut 216:329–350
Gioia R, Steinnes E, Thomas GO, Mejier SN, Jones KC (2006) Persistent organic pollutants in European background air: derivation of temporal and latitudinal trends. J Environ Monit 8:700–710
Iqbal J, Gisclair D, McMillin DJ, Portier RJ (2007) Aspects of petrochemical pollution in southeastern Louisiana (USA): pre‐Katrina background and source characterization. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2001–2009
Castle DM, Montgomery MT, Kirchman DL (2006) Effects of naphthalene on microbial community composition in the Delaware estuary. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:55–63
Beazley MJ, Martinez RJ, Rajan S, Powell J, Piceno YM, Tom LM, Andersen GL, Hazen TC, Van Nostrand JD, Zhou J (2012) Microbial community analysis of a coastal salt marsh affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. PLoS One 7:e41305
Gomes NCM, Borges LR, Paranhos R, Pinto FN, Mendonca-Hagler LC, Smalla K (2008) Exploring the diversity of bacterial communities in sediments of urban mangrove forests. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66:96–109. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00519.x
Haritash A, Kaushik C (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. J Hazard Mater 169:1–15
Simpson CD, Mosi AA, Cullen WR, Reimer KJ (1996) Composition and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in surficial marine sediments from Kitimat Harbor, Canada. Sci Total Environ 181:265–278
Peng RH, Xiong AS, Xue Y, Fu XY, Gao F, Zhao W, Tian YS, Yao QH (2008) Microbial biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:927–955. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00127.x
Samanta SK, Singh OV, Jain RK (2002) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: environmental pollution and bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol 20:243–248
Bamforth SM, Singleton I (2005) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: current knowledge and future directions. J Chem Technol Biot 80:723–736
Cerniglia CE (1992) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biodegradation 3:351–368. doi:10.1007/bf00129093
Freeman DJ, Cattell FC (1990) Woodburning as a source of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 24:1581–1585
Bayoumi R (2009) Bacterial bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in heavy oil contaminated soil. J Appl Sci Res 5:197–211
Liu K, Han W, Pan W-P, Riley JT (2001) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from a coal-fired pilot FBC system. J Hazard Mater 84:175–188
Wick AF, Haus NW, Sukkariyah BF, Haering KC, Daniels WL (2011) Remediation of PAH-contaminated soils and sediments: a literature review. Virginia Polytecnic Institute, Blacksburg
Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2008) Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179:945–963. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x
Colmer TD, Flowers TJ (2008) Flooding tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179:964–974. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02483.x
Lin Q, Mendelssohn IA (2009) Potential of restoration and phytoremediation with Juncus roemerianus for diesel-contaminated coastal wetlands. Eco Eng 35:85–91
Couto M, Basto M, Vasconcelos M (2011) Suitability of different salt marsh plants for petroleum hydrocarbons remediation. Chemosphere 84:1052–1057
Marques B, Lillebø A, Pereira E, Duarte A (2011) Mercury cycling and sequestration in salt marshes sediments: an ecosystem service provided by Juncus maritimus and Scirpus maritimus. Environ Pollut 159:1869–1876
Liu X, Wang Z, Zhang X, Wang J, Xu G, Cao Z, Zhong C, Su P (2011) Degradation of diesel-originated pollutants in wetlands by Scirpus triqueter and microorganisms. Ecotox Environ Safe 74:1967–1972
Curado G, Rubio-Casal A, Figueroa E, Castillo J (2014) Potential of Spartina maritima in restored salt marshes for phytoremediation of metals in a highly polluted estuary. Int J Phytoremediat 16:1209–1220. doi:10.1080/15226514.2013.821451
Manousaki E, Kalogerakis N (2011) Halophytes—an emerging trend in phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediat 13:959–969
EPA U (2000) Introduction to Phytoremediation. EPA-report EPA/600/R-99/107. http://clu-in.org/techpubs.htm. Accessed May 2000
Trapp S, Karlson U (2001) Aspects of phytoremediation of organic pollutants. J Soil Sediment 1:37–43. doi:10.1007/bf02986468
Garbisu C, Alkorta I (2001) Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77:229–236
Lin Q, Mendelssohn IA (1998) The combined effects of phytoremediation and biostimulation in enhancing habitat restoration and oil degradation of petroleum contaminated wetlands. Ecol Eng 10:263–274
Meudec A, Dussauze J, Deslandes E, Poupart N (2006) Evidence for bioaccumulation of PAHs within internal shoot tissues by a halophytic plant artificially exposed to petroleum-polluted sediments. Chemosphere 65:474–481
Al-Mailem D, Sorkhoh N, Marafie M, Al-Awadhi H, Eliyas M, Radwan S (2010) Oil phytoremediation potential of hypersaline coasts of the Arabian Gulf using rhizosphere technology. Bioresour Technol 101:5786–5792
Genouw G, De Naeyer F, Van Meenen P, Van de Werf H, De Nijs W, Verstraete W (1994) Degradation of oil sludge by landfarming—a case-study at the Ghent harbour. Biodegradation 5:37–46
Habe H, Omori T (2003) Genetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism in diverse aerobic bacteria. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67:225–243
Zhong Y, Luan T, Wang X, Lan C, Tam NF (2007) Influence of growth medium on cometabolic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Sphingomonas sp. strain PheB4. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:175–186
Venosa AD, Zhu X (2003) Biodegradation of crude oil contaminating marine shorelines and freshwater wetlands. Spill Sci Technol B 8:163–178
Das N, Chandran P (2010) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnol Res Int 2011:1–3. doi:10.4061/2011/941810
Coulon F, McKew BA, Osborn AM, McGenity TJ, Timmis KN (2007) Effects of temperature and biostimulation on oil‐degrading microbial communities in temperate estuarine waters. Environ Microbiol 9:177–186
Aislabie J, Saul DJ, Foght JM (2006) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles 10:171–179
Kaakinen J, Vä P, Kuokkanen T, Roppola K (2007) Studies on the effects of certain soil properties on the biodegradation of oils determined by the manometric respirometric method. J Autom Method Manag Chem 2007:1–7. doi:10.1155/2007/34601
Minai-Tehrani D, Minoui S, Herfatmanesh A (2009) Effect of salinity on biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) of heavy crude oil in soil. B Environ Contam Toxicol 82:179–184
Afzal M, Yousaf S, Reichenauer TG, Kuffner M, Sessitsch A (2011) Soil type affects plant colonization, activity and catabolic gene expression of inoculated bacterial strains during phytoremediation of diesel. J Hazard Mater 186:1568–1575
Banks M, Schwab P, Liu B, Kulakow P, Smith J, Kim R (2003) The effect of plants on the degradation and toxicity of petroleum contaminants in soil: a field assessment. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 78:75–96
Mille G, Almallah M, Bianchi M, Van Wambeke F, Bertrand J (1991) Effect of salinity on petroleum biodegradation. Fresen J Anal Chem 339:788–791
Bertrand J-C, Bianchi M, Mallah MA, Acquaviva M, Mille G (1993) Hydrocarbon biodegradation and hydrocarbonoclastic bacterial communities composition grown in seawater as a function of sodium chloride concentration. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 168:125–138
Diaz MP, Grigson SJ, Peppiatt CJ, Burgess JG (2000) Isolation and characterization of novel hydrocarbon-degrading euryhaline consortia from crude oil and mangrove sediments. Mar Biotechnol 2:522–532
Riis V, Kleinsteuber S, Babel W (2003) Influence of high salinities on the degradation of diesel fuel by bacterial consortia. Can J Microbiol 49:713–721
Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg JJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: A beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Mol Plant-Microbe 17:6–15
Moreira SM, Lima I, Ribeiro R, Guilhermino L (2006) Effects of estuarine sediment contamination on feeding and on key physiological functions of the polychaete Hediste diversicolor: Laboratory and in situ assays. Aquat Toxicol 78:186–201. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.03.001
Segura A, Rodriguez-Conde S, Ramos C, Ramos JL (2009) Bacterial responses and interactions with plants during rhizoremediation. Microb Biotechnol 2:452–464. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00113.x
Frick C, Germida J, Farrell R (1999) Assessment of phytoremediation as an in situ technique for cleaning oil-contaminated sites. In technical seminar of chemical spills (pp. 105a–124a). http://www.clu-in.info/download/remed/phyassess.pdf
Cunningham SD, Anderson TA, Schwab AP, Hsu F (1996) Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Adv Agron 56:55–114
Lodewyckx C, Vangronsveld J, Porteous F, Moore ERB, Taghavi S, Mezgeay M, der Lelie DV (2002) Endophytic bacteria and their potential applications. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:583–606. doi:10.1080/0735-260291044377
Germaine KJ, Liu X, Cabellos GG, Hogan JP, Ryan D, Dowling DN (2006) Bacterial endophyte-enhanced phytoremediation of the organochlorine herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 57:302–310. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00121.x
Phillips LA, Germida JJ, Farrell RE, Greer CW (2008) Hydrocarbon degradation potential and activity of endophytic bacteria associated with prairie plants. Soil Biol Biochem 40:3054–3064. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.006
Sheng X, Gong J (2006) Increased degradation of phenanthrene in soil by Pseudomonas sp. GF3 in the presence of wheat. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2587–2592
Phillips LA, Greer CW, Germida JJ (2006) Culture-based and culture-independent assessment of the impact of mixed and single plant treatments on rhizosphere microbial communities in hydrocarbon contaminated flare-pit soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2823–2833
Germaine KJ, Keogh E, Ryan D, Dowling DN (2009) Bacterial endophyte-mediated naphthalene phytoprotection and phytoremediation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:226–234. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01637.x
Gurska J, Wang W, Gerhardt KE, Khalid AM, Isherwood DM, Huang X-D, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Three year field test of a plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhanced phytoremediation system at a land farm for treatment of hydrocarbon waste. Environ Sci Technol 43:4472–4479
Muratova AY, Bondarenkova A, Panchenko L, Turkovskaya O (2010) Use of integrated phytoremediation for cleaning-up of oil-sludge-contaminated soil. Appl Biochem Microbiol 46:789–794
Yousaf S, Ripka K, Reichenauer T, Andria V, Afzal M, Sessitsch A (2010) Hydrocarbon degradation and plant colonization by selected bacterial strains isolated from Italian ryegrass and birdsfoot trefoil. J Appl Microbiol 109:1389–1401
Hong SH, Ryu H, Kim J, Cho K-S (2011) Rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil using the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Gordonia sp. S2RP-17. Biodegradation 22:593–601
Afzal M, Yousaf S, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2012) The inoculation method affects colonization and performance of bacterial inoculant strains in the phytoremediation of soil contaminated with diesel oil. Int J Phytoremediat 14:35–47
Liu W, Sun J, Ding L, Luo Y, Chen M, Tang C (2013) Rhizobacteria (Pseudomonas sp. SB) assist phytoremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil by tall fescue (Testuca arundinacea L.). Plant Soil (1-2):533–542
Barac T, Taghavi S, Borremans B, Provoost A, Oeyen L, Colpaert JV, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D (2004) Engineered endophytic bacteria improve phytoremediation of water-soluble, volatile, organic pollutants. Nat Biotechnol 22:583–588. doi:10.1038/nbt960
Gomes NCM, Cleary DF, Pinto FN, Egas C, Almeida A, Cunha A, Mendonça-Hagler LCS, Smalla K (2010) Taking root: enduring effect of rhizosphere bacterial colonization in mangroves. PLoS One 11:e14065
Juhanson J, Truu J, Heinaru E, Heinaru A (2009) Survival and catabolic performance of introduced Pseudomonas strains during phytoremediation and bioaugmentation field experiment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:446–455
Yousaf S, Afzal M, Reichenauer TG, Brady CL, Sessitsch A (2011) Hydrocarbon degradation, plant colonization and gene expression of alkane degradation genes by endophytic Enterobacter ludwigii strains. Environ Pollut 159:2675–2683
Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremedition. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144214
Andria V, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2009) Expression of alkane monooxygenase alkB genes by plant-associated bacteria in the rhizosphere and endosphere of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) grown in diesel contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 157:3347–3350
Schneegurt MA, Kulpa CF (1998) The application of molecular techniques in environmental biotechnology for monitoring microbial systems. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 27:73–79
Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278:1–9
Germaine K, Keogh E, Garcia‐Cabellos G, Borremans B, Lelie D, Barac T, Oeyen L, Vangronsveld J, Moore FP, Moore ER (2004) Colonisation of poplar trees by gfp expressing bacterial endophytes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48:109–118
Afzal M, Khan S, Iqbal S, Mirza MS, Khan QM (2013) Inoculation method affects colonization and activity of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN during phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 85:331–336
Baek K-H, Yoon B-D, Cho D-H, Kim B-H, Oh H-M, Kim H-S (2009) Monitoring bacterial population dynamics using real-time PCR during the bioremediation of crude-oil-contaminated soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:339–345
Phillips LA, Greer CW, Farrell RE, Germida JJ (2012) Plant root exudates impact the hydrocarbon degradation potential of a weathered-hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Appl Soil Ecol 52:56–64
Wang Y, Sheng H-F, He Y, Wu J-Y, Jiang Y-X, Tam NF-Y, Zhou H-W (2012) Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8264–8271
Roesch LF, Fulthorpe RR, Riva A, Casella G, Hadwin AK, Kent AD, Daroub SH, Camargo FA, Farmerie WG, Triplett EW (2007) Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J 1:283–290
Bowen JL, Morrison HG, Hobbie JE, Sogin ML (2012) Salt marsh sediment diversity: a test of the variability of the rare biosphere among environmental replicates. ISME J 6:2014–2023
Zhang W, Wu X, Liu G, Chen T, Zhang G, Dong Z, Yang X, Hu P (2013) Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of three Phragmites australis ecotypes. Geomicrobiol J 30:593–599
Singleton DR, Richardson SD, Aitken MD (2011) Pyrosequence analysis of bacterial communities in aerobic bioreactors treating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Biodegradation 22:1061–1073
Sutton NB, Maphosa F, Morillo JA, Al-Soud WA, Langenhoff AA, Grotenhuis T, Rijnaarts HH, Smidt H (2013) Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:619–630
RamanaRao MV, Weindorf D, Breitenbeck G, Baisakh N (2012) Differential expression of the transcripts of Spartina alterniflora Loisel (smooth cordgrass) induced in response to petroleum hydrocarbon. Mol Biotechnol 51:18–26
Taghavi S, Barac T, Greenberg B, Borremans B, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D (2005) Horizontal gene transfer to endogenous endophytic bacteria from poplar improves phytoremediation of toluene. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8500–8505. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8500-8505.2005
Radwan S, Dashti N, El-Nemr I (2005) Enhancing the growth of Vicia faba plants by microbial inoculation to improve their phytoremediation potential for oily desert areas. Int J Phytoremediat 7:19–32
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro (CESAM, project Pest C/MAR/LA0017/2011). Financial support to V. Oliveira was provided by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) in the form of a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/46977/ 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oliveira, V., Gomes, N.C.M., Almeida, A. et al. Microbe-Assisted Phytoremediation of Hydrocarbons in Estuarine Environments. Microb Ecol 69, 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0455-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0455-9