Abstract
Microbial biodiversity provides an increasingly important source of medically and industrially useful compounds. We have isolated 14 actinomycete species from a collection of approximately 300 plant stem samples from the upper Amazonian rainforest in Peru. All of the cultured isolates produce substances with inhibitory activity directed at a range of potential fungal and bacterial pathogens. For some organisms, this activity is very broad in spectrum while other organisms show specific activity against a limited number of organisms. Two of these organisms preferentially inhibit bacterial test organisms over eukaryotic organisms. rDNA sequence analysis indicates that these organisms are not equivalent to any other cultured deposits in GenBank. Our results provide evidence of the untapped biodiversity in the form of biologically active microbes present within the tissues of higher plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Virtually all plants possess a microbiota. Many microbes colonize the surface features of plants and survive as epiphytes. Another group of microbial colonizers are endophytes which take up residence in the inner tissues of plants and, by definition, cause no apparent damage to the tissues that they inhabit [4, 28, 32]. The simplest biological arrangement between these organisms is that the plant provides nutrition for the microbe and the microbe provides some form of protection for the plant [4, 15, 32]. Within the last decade, it has become clear that there is enormous microbiological diversity residing within the tissues of plants [2, 13, 15, 18, 24, 27]. The ecological role of the endophyte to the plant remains uncertain, although there are indications that certain endophytes confer heat tolerance [23, 25], salt tolerance [25], and protection to the plant from invading fungal pathogens [3].
The vast majority of microbes isolated as endophytes are fungi [4]. Only recently have biologically active endophytic actinomycetes been isolated and characterized (for example, [6–12, 14, 16, 26, 29, 31, 33, 34]). As a group, the actinomycetes provide nearly 80% of all of the world’s antibiotics [4], though in all cases, organisms isolated from the soil were the source. The advent of drug-resistant bacterial pathogens and the increase in fungal infections has caused a resurgence of interest in finding other reserves of biologically active compounds from the streptomycetes [5, 21]. One biologically important niche that has been overlooked as a source of novel streptomycetes is that endophytes may exist in various ecosystems around the world. This appears to be a reasonable source for new antibiotics given that endophytic streptomycetes are associated with a eukaryotic organism and may be less likely to produce compounds toxic to the eukaryotic host. Thus, one of the major concerns in drug discovery, relating to the toxicity of a drug candidate, may be reduced by dealing with endophytic streptomycetes and their biologically active products.
Many of the recently described endophytic streptomycetes possess unique 16S rDNA sequences, make totally novel biologically active products, possess unique hyphal structures, and have interesting and novel cultural characteristics [8–11, 14, 34]. Novel taxonomy may highlight novel chemistry providing prospects for finding new biologically active compounds for agriculture, medicine, and industry [28].
We took a collecting expedition into the Amazon—the largest and most biologically diverse terrestrial ecosystem in the world—in order to find novel endophytic actinomycetes. From this important ecosystem, only one endophytic actinomycete has been reported [11, 14]. It was suspected that such organisms must be present given its vast size and the enormous number of plant species that it supports. This report describes the isolation of several novel actinomycetes from the rainforests of the upper Amazon in Peru. Aspects of their classification and some characterization of their biological activities are also presented. An added feature of the work is that the sampling, processing, and discovery of these organisms was conducted by undergraduate students, each of whom had the experience and excitement of being involved in the discovery process.
Methods
Plant Sampling
Approximately 300 plants were sampled based primarily on ethnobotanical history. Plant specimens were obtained during the month of March 2007 in two locations of the Peruvian Amazon basin—near Lake Sandoval (12°36.377′ S to 12°36.344′ S longitude, 69°01.818′ W to 69°01.950′ W latitude) and along the Heath River near the Southeastern Peru–Bolivia border (12°39.716′ S to 12°40.760′ S longitude to 68°42.722′ W to 68°40.977′ W latitude). Stem clippings of fresh growth were collected into plastic bags and kept cold until they could be processed. Voucher specimens were collected in duplicate. One set of plants was placed in the herbarium at the Universidad Nacional San Antonio de Abad, Cusco, Peru and another at the Yale University Herbarium, New Haven, USA. Plant material was identified and authenticated by Percy Núñez Vargas.
Isolation of Actinomycetes
Stem samples were subjected to a 70% ethanol wash followed by brief flaming to remove surface-associated microorganisms. Using aseptic technique, the outer tissue was removed, and inner tissues were plated onto culture plates containing glycerol–arginine agar [19]. All plates were contained in plastic storage boxes at room temperature and checked every few days for microbe growth. As microbes became apparent over the course of a 6-week period, they were carefully transferred to plates containing either potato dextrose agar at one tenth the recommended concentration (1:10 PDA) or nutrient agar at one tenth the recommended concentration (1:10 NA). Media were used at a dilute concentration to avoid robust growth by the most vigorous organisms. Because both bacterial and fungal isolates were desired, no antimicrobial compounds were added to the media. All cultures were grown at room temperature. All organisms that appeared as actinomycetes and possessed an earthy odor were tagged as potential actinomycete candidates. These organisms were stored in 15% glycerol solution at −80°C. Permanent stocks were made by colonizing triply autoclaved barley seeds and the organisms were stored in the living culture collection at Montana State University at −70°C and each given an acquisition number (Table 1).
Genomic DNA Isolation and rDNA Analysis
Four-milliliter cultures were grown at room temperature (22°C) by shaking at 200 rpm in either nutrient broth medium or potato dextrose (PD) broth medium for approximately 2 days or until significant growth was observed. DNA was harvested using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. Approximately 10 ng of genomic DNA was used as a template for amplification of a region of the 16S ribosomal DNA. Amplifications were performed using an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C followed by 30 cycles each of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 55°C, 1.5 min at 72°C. The 30 cycles were followed by a 5-min extension at 72°C. One hundred microliter reaction mixtures contained approximately 10 ng genomic DNA; 1× GoTaq® Flexi Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA); 200 µmol/L (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 2.5 mM MgCl2; 2.5U GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega); 1.5 µM each primer. The primers used in all cases except for P801A were 63F (5′-GGG CGG WGT GTA CAA GGC-3′) and 1387R (5′-GGG CGG WGT GTA CAA GGC-3′) [22]. Primers used for P801A were 907R (5′-CCG TCA ATT CMT TTR AGT TT-3′) and 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) [20]. The amplified product was purified using the QIAquick polymerase chain reaction purification kit (Qiagen). DNA sequence analysis was carried out on an Applied Biosystems 3730 capillary instrument. rDNA sequences were submitted to GenBank and accession numbers assigned (Table 1). Sequences were subjected to BLASTN analysis [1] with the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) accessed on June 4, 2008. The closest named species match was recorded along with the percent sequence identity (Table 1). The DNA sequences were aligned and compared to each other using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 3.3.14.
Morphological Characterization
Initial characterization of isolates growing on nutrient or potato dextrose agar was performed using a Stereo Discovery V8 Stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Colony morphology was recorded after 6 days, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks of growth. Some samples confirmed as Actinobacteria through 16S rDNA sequence analysis and preliminary morphological observation were transferred to agar containing γ-irradiated carnation leaves to facilitate development of spore structures and these were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Individual agar plugs containing microbe-colonized carnation leaves were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2–7.4) and Triton-X 100, aspirated for 5 min and fixed overnight. The samples were then processed as described in [9]. The samples were critical-point dried and gold-sputter-coated, and images were recorded with a JEOL 6100 scanning electron microscope.
Bioassays
Each actinomycete isolate was grown on either 1:10 PDA or NA for 14 days at room temperature. The test organisms were: Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, Geotrichum candidum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Cerospora sp., Phytophthora cinnamomi, Colletotrichum lagenarium, Verticillium dahliae, Trichoderma viride, and Pythium ultimum provided by G.A.S; Candida albicans and Staphylococcus epidermidis, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection; Escherichia coli obtained from the Coli Genetic Stock Center at Yale University; and Bacillus subtilis, provided by Dr. A.L. Sonenshein, Tufts University School of Medicine.
For the fungal growth-inhibition assays (except C. albicans), the isolates were plated in a “cross” pattern that divided the plate into quarters. After 14 days, 3 × 3 × 3-mm plugs of agar containing freshly grown cultures of the fungal test organisms were plated at a location in the central portion of the quadrant. In order to ensure consistency, a paper template was made that provided uniform placement of the fungal test organisms and the position of the bacterial crosses.
To assay inhibition of growth of C. albicans, E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. epidermidis, the actinomycete was plated in a line down the center of the plate. After 14 days, each test organism was streaked perpendicular to the growth of the endophyte, starting near the endophyte and extending toward the edge of the plate. A paper template aided in obtaining consistent placement of microbes on all plates. All bioassays were performed in triplicate.
Growth of the test organisms was evaluated after 24, 48, and 72 h. For the fungi, the hyphal growth of the test organism was measured in millimeters and compared to growth of test organism plated in the absence of endophytic isolate. The values shown in Table 2 are the averages from three experiments. Growth of the yeast C. albicans and of the bacterial test organisms was inspected after 24, 48, and 72 h and scored as no growth, growth, or partial growth.
Results
Endophytic Actinomycetes Isolated from Amazon Rainforest Sampling Sites
A total of ∼300 apparently disease-free plants were sampled and subjected to surface treatment processes to eliminate surface associated microorganisms. Endophytes were isolated from internal plant stem tissues. Cultures that exhibited growth morphology indicative of actinomycetes were selected for further study. All exhibited filamentous growth and produced an earthy odor. Additional morphological observations combined with rDNA analysis confirmed that at least 14 of these isolates were actinomycetes. Of these, one is a Micromonospora sp., one is an Amycolatopsis sp., and the remaining 12 belong to the genus Streptomyces. Of the actinomycetes isolated, only two isolates had the same rRNA sequence (P506A and P513A). All others exhibited differences in rRNA sequence, morphology, and growth inhibition patterns. In addition, 16S partial ribosomal sequences did not show 100% identity with any organisms existing in GenBank on June 4, 2008 (Table 1). There were 14 actinomycete isolates obtained from 12 different plant species representing ten plant families, suggesting that endophytic actinomycetes are likely widespread throughout plant phylogeny (Fig. 1).
The source plant and identifying features of each actinomycete is summarized in Table 1. The morphologies indicated in Table 1 refer to those seen when the organisms were grown for 2 weeks on PDA with one exception; the clear liquid observed on the colony surface of P1403H was observed when grown on nutrient agar. The majority of the microbes show more robust growth on NA than PDA, with the exception of P1303B and P1801B which prefer PDA. All endophytes for which spores were observed, except P503A, produce barrel-shaped spores about 1 µM in length. The spores of P503A were less blunt-ended and rounder than all other spore structures observed (Fig. 2).
The combined morphological and rDNA sequences suggest that all 14 organisms are unique. Although P506A and P513A have the same rDNA sequence over the 1,200 nucleotides sequenced, these two organisms have distinguishable growth morphologies and different growth inhibition profiles. When grown on PDA, P506A produces yellow- to mocha-colored colonies that produce narrow, vertical projections visible with the naked eye. When grown on 1× PDA, P513A, like P506A, produces brownish colonies, but unlike P506A, it secretes metabolites into the medium. P513A colonies are rounded and raised yet appear to collapse in the center over time, leading to a wrinkled appearance by the naked eye without the dramatic vertical projections seen in P506A. The colonies appear wet and not at all chalky and are surrounded by a halo not seen in P506A colonies.
Two other organisms sharing similarities are P1400C and P1400D. While both cultures were isolated from the same plant and exhibit a similar growth inhibition profile, the growth morphology and rDNA sequence data differ. On both PDA and NA, P1400C colonies appear raised, produce darker mycelia than P1400D and secrete an orange-brown metabolite not observed with P1400D growth. The reverse side of the P1400D colonies is reddish brown as opposed to the grey of P1400C. Although P1400C and P1400D share S. hygroscopicus as the closest relative in GenBank, out of approximately 1,200 nucleotides sequenced, there are differences at 16 locations.
Phylogenetic Analyses
Standard methodologies were used to create a phylogenetic tree. The 16S rDNA sequences were placed in Megalign from DNAStar at default settings comparing the relatedness of our organisms to each other, to their closest named relatives in GenBank, and to other known Streptomyces species (Fig. 1). None of our organisms matched known species. Interestingly, four endophytes (P1801B, P1303B, P513A, and P506A) show higher identity in 16S rDNA sequence to each other than to any other named relative in GenBank. As expected, P801A and P1318F, the two non-Streptomyces species, fall into different clades.
All Isolated Organisms Produce Growth-Inhibitory Substances
Novel organisms are likely to harbor metabolic pathways that may lead to the production of novel secondary metabolites. Based on the fact that these Amazonian actinomycetes appeared different from previously described organisms, it may be the case that they produce novel natural products including, but not limited to, antimicrobial compounds although further structural studies will be necessary to determine if this is the case. In order to test for the production of antibiotics, bioassay tests were performed in which a panel of test fungi, oomycetes, and bacteria were challenged with 14-day-old endophyte cultures. Our panel of test microbes included fungal plant pathogens from the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, an opportunistic fungal human pathogen (C. albicans), two plant pathogenic oomycetes, and representative gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
Inhibition Summary
All endophytes tested demonstrated robust antimicrobial activity (≥90% growth inhibition) against a minimum of six microbial test organisms. A large difference in inhibitory activities and target organism specificity was associated with each endophyte. In addition, choice of growth media affected the spectrum of growth inhibitory activity of some endophytes (Table 2; Fig. 3). For example, P1519C shows 100% inhibition of Geotrichum when grown on 1:10 PDA plates but only 22% inhibition on NA plates. Conversely, this same organism exhibited 100% inhibition of Cerospora and Verticillium when grown on NA plates without showing significant inhibition of these same organisms on 1:10 PDA. Organisms P503A, P801A, P911A, P1400D, 1403H, and P1801B showed a broad spectrum of activity against the largest panel of test organisms. P506A inhibited the lowest number of fungal test organisms; however, it was one of only three endophytes that inhibited all three bacterial test organisms, suggesting a prokaryotic inhibitory preference.
Fungal Inhibition
Each endophyte was able to confer robust growth inhibition of at least three fungal or oomycete test organisms. We quantified the inhibitory activity directed against the fungal test organisms that exhibited mycelial growth (Table 2). On the media used in our bioassays, the dimorphic fungus C. albicans grows as a unicellular yeast rather than exhibiting the mycelial morphology typical of the other test fungi. For this reason, we assayed inhibition of C. albicans growth using the same criteria as for the bacterial test organisms (see below). Four endophytic isolates were able to inhibit growth of all ten fungal (non-Candida) test organisms when inhibition was defined as growth limited to 10% or less than that observed in the absence of the endopyte (≥90% inhibition; Fig. 3). Interestingly, two of these (P503A and P1801B) could not inhibit any of these test organisms when plated on alternate media, suggesting the importance of media in inducing production of specific secondary metabolites.
Bacterial and Candida Inhibition
A total of eight endophytes exhibited what appeared to be robust inhibition of at least one of the three bacterial test organisms (Fig. 3). Three endophytes exhibited robust inhibition of the yeast C. albicans. Robust inhibition was defined as no visible growth of the test organism after 3 days in the presence of the endophyte. Endophytes P506A, P513A, and P801A showed complete inhibition of all three bacterial test organisms as well as C. albicans. For P506A and P513A, this inhibition was observed only when the endophytes were grown on NA. P801A lost the ability to fully inhibit C. albicans and E. coli when grown on 1:10 PDA but retained the ability to inhibit B. subtilis and S. epidermidis on both media types.
Discussion
A total of 14 actinomycetes were isolated from the inner tissue of healthy plants found in the rainforests of southeastern Peru and the Heath river area of Bolivia. Molecular biology (16S rDNA) combined with morphological data indicate that these organisms are all distinct from each other and from any other sequences deposited in GenBank (as accessed on June 4, 2008). While it is not uncommon for rDNA analysis of environmental samples to indicate the presence of unique microbes, it is significant to note that all of our sequences represent organisms that were cultured and deposited into a permanent microbial culture collection. To our knowledge, only one other endophytic actinomycete has been isolated from the upper Amazon region of Peru [14]. Interestingly, it was isolated from Monstera, the same genus from which we isolated two different Streptomyces isolates.
While many of the endophytes show a relatively broad spectrum of biological activity, it is important to emphasize that a broad spectrum of activity may be due to multiple compounds secreted by the endophyte, rather than a single inhibitory compound. Furthermore, organisms that demonstrate selective inhibition of only a few organisms may prove valuable in circumstances where selectivity is required. The bioactivity associated with these organisms indicates the potential commercial value of these endophytes and of rainforest plants in general. The prevalence of antimicrobial compounds produced by the endophytes may be explained as a contribution to the host plant in exchange for the nutrients and protection afforded the endophyte by the plant. While this study did not directly demonstrate the role of the actinomycete to the biology of the host plant, it represents a necessary step in understanding the role of these microbes in the forest ecosystem. It is reasonable to hypothesize that because these organisms are present as endophytes, they must be involved in one or more ways in the intricate complex life of the forest.
Finally, it is noteworthy that a group of enthusiastic, though inexperienced, undergraduates could isolate such a large number of potentially novel actinomycetes over a 4-month period. It has been proposed that a successful undergraduate research program should allow investigations where multiple students participate in discovery-based projects. In such projects, each student should perform similar, but nonidentical, tasks in parallel during the initial stages of the project [17, 30]. This study fulfills these criteria and at the same time has provided a wealth of opportunities for continued undergraduate research. Future studies will include purification and characterization of the antimicrobial products as well as further characterization of the endophytic isolates.
References
Altschul S, Madden T, Schffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D (1997) Gapped blast and psi-blast: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402
Araujo WL, Marcon J, Maccheroni W Jr, Van Elsas JD, Van Vuurde JW, Azevedo JL (2002) Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4906–4914
Arnold A, Mejia L, Kyllo D, Rojas E, Maynard Z, Robbins N, Herre E (2003) Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15649–15654
Bacon C, White J (2000) Microbial endophytes. Marcel Dekker, New York
Berdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 58:1–26
Cao L, Qiu Z, You J, Tan H, Zhou S (2005) Isolation and characterization of endophytic streptomycete antagonists of fusarium wilt pathogen from surface-sterilized banana roots. FEMS Microbiol Lett 247:147–152
Caruso M, Colombo AL, Fedeli L, Pavesi A, Quaroni S, Saracchi M, Ventrella G (2000) Isolation of endophytic fungi and actinomycetes taxane producers. Ann Microbiol 50:3–13
Castillo U, Harper J, Strobel G, Sears J, Alesi K, Ford E, Lin J, Hunter M, Maranta M, Haiyan G, Yaver D, Jensen JB, Porter H, Robinson R, Millar D, Hess WM, Condron M, Teplow D (2003) Kakadumycins, novel antibiotics from streptomyces sp. Nrrl 30566, an endophyte of grevillea pteridifolia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 224(2):183–190
Castillo U, Myers S, Browne L, Strobel G, Hess WM, Hanks J, Reay D (2005) Scanning electron microscopy of some endophytic streptomycetes in snakevine–kennedia nigricans. Scanning 27:305–311
Castillo U, Strobel G, Ford E, Hess W, Porter H, Jensen J, Albert H, Robison R, Condron MAM, Teplow D, Stevens D, Yaver D (2002) Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by streptomyces nrrl 30562, endophytic on kennedia nigriscans. Microbiology 148:2675–2685
Castillo UF, Browne L, Strobel G, Hess WM, Ezra S, Pacheco G, Ezra D (2007) Biologically active endophytic streptomycetes from nothofagus spp. And other plants in patagonia. Microb Ecol 53:12–19
de Araújo J, da Silva A, Azevedo J (2000) Isolation of endophytic actinomycetes from roots and leaves of maize (zea mays l.). Braz Arch Biol Technol 43:447–451
Elvira-Recuenco M, van Vuurde JW (2000) Natural incidence of endophytic bacteria in pea cultivars under field conditions. Can J Microbiol 46:1036–1041
Ezra D, Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Hess WM, Porter H, Jensen JB, Condron MA, Teplow DB, Sears J, Maranta M, Hunter M, Weber B, Yaver D (2004) Coronamycins, peptide antibiotics produced by a verticillate streptomyces sp. (msu-2110) endophytic on monstera sp. Microbiology 150:785–793
Garbeva P, Overbeek LS, Vuurde JW, Elsas JD (2001) Analysis of endophytic bacterial communities of potato by plating and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (dgge) of 16s rdna based pcr fragments. Microb Ecol 41:369–383
Gurney K, Mantle P (1993) Biosynthesis of 1-n-methylalbonoursin by an endophytic streptomyces sp. Isolated from perennial ryegrass. J Nat Prod 56:1194–1198
Hanauer DI, Jacobs-Sera D, Pedulla ML, Cresawn SG, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF (2006) Inquiry learning. Teaching scientific inquiry. Science 314:1880–1881
Idris R, Trifonova R, Puschenreiter M, Wenzel WW, Sessitsch A (2004) Bacterial communities associated with flowering plants of the ni hyperaccumulator thlaspi goesingense. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2667–2677
Kutzner H (1986) The family streptomycetaceae. In: Starr M, Stolp H, Trüper H, Ballows A, Schlegel H (eds) The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, pp 2025–2090
Lane D, Pace B, Olsen G, Stahl D, Sogin M, Pace N (1985) Rapid determination of 16s ribosomal rna sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6955–6599
Lechevalier HA, Lechevalier MP (1967) Biology of actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol 21:71–100
Marchesi J, Sato T, Weightman A, Martin T, Fry J, Hiom S, Dymock D, Wade W (1998) Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific pcr primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16s rrna. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:795–799
Redman RS, Sheehan KB, Stout RG, Rodriguez RJ, Henson JM (2002) Thermotolerance generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science 298:1581
Reiter B, Sessitsch A (2006) Bacterial endophytes of the wildflower crocus albiflorus analyzed by characterization of isolates and by a cultivation-independent approach. Can J Microbiol 52:140–149
Rodriguez R, Henson J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hoy M, Wright L, Beckwith F, Kim Y, Redman R (2008) Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J 4:404–416
Shimizu M, Nakagawa Y, Sato Y, Furumai T, Igarashi Y, Onaka H, Yoshida R, Kunoh H (2000) Studies on endophytic actinomycetes (i) streptomyces sp. Isolated from rhododendron and its antifungal activity. J Gen Plant Pathol 66:360–366
Smith SA, Tank DC, Boulanger LA, Bascom-Slack CA, Eisenman K, Kingery D, Babbs B, Fenn K, Greene JS, Hann BD, Keehner J, Kelley-Swift EG, Kembaiyan V, Lee SJ, Li P, Light DY, Lin EH, Ma C, Moore E, Schorn MA, Vekhter D, Nunez PV, Strobel GA, Donoghue MJ, Strobel SA (2008) Bioactive endophytes warrant intensified exploration and conservation. PLoS ONE 3:e3052
Strobel G, Daisy B (2003) Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:491–502
Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U, Harper J (2004) Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod 67:257–268
Strobel SA, Strobel GA (2007) Plant endophytes as a platform for discovery-based undergraduate science education. Nat Chem Biol 3:356–359
Taechowisan T, Wanbanjob A, Tuntiwachwuttikul P, Taylor W (2006) Identification of streptomyces sp. Tc022, an endophyte in alpinia galanga, and the isolation of actinomycin d. Ann Microbiol 56:113–117
Tan R, Zou W (2001) Endophytes: A rich source of functional metabolites. Nat Prod Rep 18:448–459
Tian XL, Cao LX, Tan HM, Zeng QG, Jia YY, Han WQ, Zhou SN (2004) Study on the communities of endophytic fungi and endophytic actinomycetes from rice and their antipathogenic activities in vitro. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:303–309
Zin N, Sarmin N, Ghadin N, Basri D, Sidik N, Hess W, Strobel G (2007) Bioactive endophytic streptomycetes from the malay peninsula. FEMS Microbiol Lett 274:83–88
Acknowledgments
This program was supported in part by a grant to Yale University, in support of S.A.S., from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the _HHMI Professors Program. Additional funding was also provided by the National Science Foundation to S.A.S. (OISE 0636212). S.J.L. was supported by a fellowship from the Beckman Foundation. Assistance in plant collection was provided by Mr. Javier Huayaban Troncoso and Mr. Oscar Caceres Maceda of Nature Inka, Peru. The fungal test organisms were provided by G.A. Strobel, Department of Plant Sciences, Montana State University; the Bacillus subtilis was provided by Dr. A.L. Sonenshein, Tufts University School of Medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bascom-Slack, C.A., Ma, C., Moore, E. et al. Multiple, Novel Biologically Active Endophytic Actinomycetes Isolated from Upper Amazonian Rainforests. Microb Ecol 58, 374–383 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9494-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9494-z