Abstract
Transperineal US has increased in use in the last decade. It is helpful in the evaluation of distal genitourinary structures, the rectum and overlying soft tissues. When used in conjunction with transabdominal US, transperineal US can further delineate anatomy and assess abnormalities that affect the lower pelvis. This paper describes optimal technique and common indications for transperineal US in children with examples of congenital and acquired lesions in pediatric patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Transperineal sonography has been used as an adjunct scanning technique in a number of clinical situations [1-5], and as such , is also known as translabial sonography.. Additional uses in adults include the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders with two-, three- and four-dimensional techniques [6]. The pediatric literature includes the use of transperineal US for the evaluation of vaginal atresia [7], posterior urethral valves [8], imperforate anus [9, 10], perianal inflammatory disease [11] and vesicoureteral reflux with the aid of US contrast [12].
Transperineal US is best performed with a high-frequency linear array transducer (8 MHz or higher), with a thick coating of gel over the perineum to eliminate air artifact. Microcase sector and curved transducers may also be useful. The transducer may be covered in a thin plastic sheath with gel over the faceplate. Superficial lesions may be better evaluated with a stand-off gel pad. Some practitioners may choose to invert the sonographic image on the screen to correspond with the standard orientation used with voiding cystourethrograms (VCUGs). At our institution, the radiologist and sonographers leave the image as it is acquired. Either approach works; the key is to be consistent so that normal structures are familiar and abnormalities are quickly recognized.
The patient is placed supine and the transducer is initially placed longitudinally on the perineum. In boys, the transducer is placed just below the scrotum and includes the ventral aspect of the base of the penis. Older children can be placed in the modified lithotomy position to facilitate the position of the legs. The midsagittal plane is identified by the presence of the pubic symphysis and urethra on the same image. In boys, the urethra, corpora cavernosa, anterior rectal wall and bladder base are included in the field of view (Fig. 1). In girls, the vagina is additionally seen between the rectum and bladder (Fig. 1).
There are special considerations and pitfalls when performing transperineal sonography. Care must be taken when scanning a boy as urethral anatomy can be distorted by excessive pressure by the transducer. Urethral obstructions or strictures may be missed if the child is catheterized or is not actively voiding, although multiple urethral strictures can still be missed despite adequate distention. Positioning the child obliquely or on his side may be necessary so that he can void into a container. The Credé maneuver (downward pressure on the lower abdominal wall) can express urine from the bladder to distend the urethra if the child is too young to void voluntarily. In girls, excessive transducer pressure can cause artificial reflux of urine into the vagina.
Contrast-enhanced US, which relies heavily on transperineal US for the evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux, the urethra and the genital tract, will not be discussed as this technique is not routinely used at our institution.
Indications
Transperineal US is best suited to assess abnormalities involving the urethra and surrounding soft tissues, anus and rectum and, in girls, distal gynecological structures. As such, it provides additional information when used in conjunction with transabdominal US and should not, in most cases, be performed in isolation.
Urethral and periurethral lesions
While voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) or retrograde urethrogram is the standard for urethral evaluation, advances in transducers and increasing use of transperineal US have made sonography a more common option [2, 3, 6].
Urethral lesions are relatively uncommon in children. They include polyps (Fig. 2), stones, tumors, granulomas, strictures, diverticula (Fig. 3) and syringocoele of the bulbourethral duct [13]. For urethral diverticula, a fluid-filled, distended urethra can aid in identifying the connection from the urethra to the diverticulum differentiating it from periurethral cysts, which do not communicate with the urethra. In boys, a prostatic utricle cyst (Fig. 4) is an additional entity to consider. And while VCUG is the standard for the evaluation of posterior urethral valves (Fig. 5), its identification and appearance with transperineal US has been described in the literature [8].
Transperineal US is also useful in the intraoperative evaluation of posterior urethral strictures in boys. This is best achieved by simultaneously distending the proximal and distal urethra with the Credé maneuver and retrograde instillation of saline, respectively, during sonography. This technique helps clearly identify the location, length and characteristics of the urethral obstruction (Figs. 6 and 7). We have also used transperineal US to evaluate penile postoperative complications after hypospadias or epispadias repair (Fig. 8).
Transperineal US may reveal the insertion site of an ectopic ureter into the urethra (Fig. 9). Following the Weigert-Meyer rule, the upper pole ureter of a duplex kidney most often inserts medial and inferior to the orthotopic ureter. Identifying the insertion site of an ectopic ureter in an incontinent girl may have enormous quality of life ramifications as the ectopic ureter can insert below the bladder sphincter in girls [14]. Enuresis does not occur in boys as the ectopic insertion is always above the external sphincter.
Periurethral cysts (Fig. 10) include vaginal cysts (mullerian, Gartner duct and epidermal inclusion cysts), Skene duct cysts and Bartholin gland cysts. Transperineal US is helpful in determining the location and size of urethral and periurethral cysts, although it should be noted that their sonographic appearance is often nonspecific.
Gynecological abnormalities
Transperineal US is most useful in evaluating the American Fertility Society class I mullerian duct anomalies, which include segmental or complete agenesis or hypoplasia of the vagina, cervix, fundus and fallopian tubes in any combination; Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is the most common entity in this category (Fig. 11) [15]. The ovaries and external genitalia are usually normal in cases of mullerian duct anomalies as these structures are derived separately [16]. Imperforate hymen (Fig. 12) is not a mullerian duct anomaly and should be distinguished from a transverse vaginal septum [17].
Transperineal US works particularly well in female neonates due to their small size and prominent uterus, cervix and vaginal mucosa from maternal hormonal stimulation (Fig. 13) [4, 18].
An unusual diagnosis we have made with transperineal US is clitoral thrombus (Fig. 14). While a rare occurrence, US can make the diagnosis and prevent further imaging or intervention.
Anorectal malformations
Anorectal malformations encompass a number of congenital anomalies that affect the anus, rectum and, in many cases, the urinary and genital tracts. Most cases involve an imperforate anus (IA) [9, 10, 19]. Ultrasound is preferred for the preoperative evaluation of anorectal malformations, as there is no need for sedation or anesthesia and it lacks ionization radiation.
The distance between the perineum and distal rectal pouch (Fig. 15) can differentiate low-type from intermediate- or high-type imperforate anus [9, 10]. This distinction is important as the type of IA dictates surgical approach [20]. The boundary of the distal rectal pouch is identified by meconium or air. Minimal pressure on the transducer will prevent erroneously decreasing the measured distance. Associated internal fistulas can often be identified with high-resolution transducers (Fig. 16) [10].
Ambiguous genitalia
In cases of ambiguous genitalia, US is used to identify internal reproductive organs and a potential urogenital sinus. The evaluation for internal reproductive organs is best accomplished with transabdominal US. However, inguinal or transperineal US can help locate gonads in the groin (Fig. 17) or labia [4]. In addition, transperineal US may be able to identify the commonly associated urogenital sinus (Fig. 18).
Miscellaneous perineal soft-tissue masses
Perineal soft-tissue masses seen in both boys and girls include perianal abscesses and vascular or lymphatic malformations (Fig. 19).
In girls, one should consider a hernia through a patent canal of Nuck as a cause for a labial mass. The canal of Nuck is an abnormal opening in the parietal peritoneum extending into the labia majora in girls. Normally, this canal obliterates during the first year of life, but if it remains patent an indirect inguinal hernia can occur [21]. Pelvic organs (Fig. 20) can herniate or hydroceles can form [22]. It is important to also scan the groin to establish continuity with the peritoneal cavity.
Conclusion
A number of abnormalities affecting the urethra and surrounding soft tissues, anus, rectum and distal gynecological structures can be better assessed by transperineal ultrasonography rather than with transabdominal ultrasonography. Careful application of this technique may aid in the further evaluation of a wide range of congenital and acquired processes affecting children.
References
Cohen HL, Susman M, Haller JO et al (1994) Posterior urethral valve: transperineal US for imaging and diagnosis in male infants. Radiology 192:261–264
Duran C, Valera V, Alguersuari A et al (2009) Voiding urosonography: the study of the urethra is no longer a limitation of the technique. Pediatr Radiol 39:124–131
Schoellnast H, Lindbichler F, Riccabona M (2004) Sonographic diagnosis of urethral anomalies in infants: value of perineal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 23:769–776
Teele RL, Share JC (1997) Transperineal sonography in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1263–1267
Hertzberg BS, Bowie JD, Carroll BA et al (1992) Diagnosis of placenta previa during the third trimester: role of transperineal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:83–87
Prasad SR, Menias CO, Narra VR et al (2005) Cross-sectional imaging of the female urethra: technique and results. Radiographics 25:749–761
Scanlan KA, Pozniak MA, Fagerholm M et al (1990) Value of transperineal sonography in the assessment of vaginal atresia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:545–548
Good CD, Vinnicombe SJ, Minty IL et al (1996) Posterior urethral valves in male infants and newborns: detection with US of the urethra before and during voiding. Radiology 198:387–391
Haber HP, Seitz G, Warmann SW et al (2007) Transperineal sonography for determination of the type of imperforate anus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1525–1529
Kim IO, Han TI, Kim WS et al (2000) Transperineal ultrasonography in imperforate anus: identification of the internal fistula. J Ultrasound Med 19:211–216
Mallouhi A, Bonatti H, Peer S et al (2004) Detection and characterization of perianal inflammatory disease: accuracy of transperineal combined gray scale and color Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 23:19–27
Berrocal T, Gaya F, Arjonilla A (2005) Vesicoureteral reflux: can the urethra be adequately assessed by using contrast-enhanced voiding US of the bladder? Radiology 234:235–241
Lo A, Upadhyay V, Teele RL (2011) Syringocoele of the bulbourethral duct with additional lower genito-urinary anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 41:1201–1204
Carrico C, Lebowitz RL (1998) Incontinence due to an infrasphincteric ectopic ureter: why the delay in diagnosis and what the radiologist can do about it. Pediatr Radiol 28:942–949
Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233:19–34
Emans SJ, Laufer MR, Goldstein DP (eds) (2005) Pediatric and adolescent gynecology. Structural abnormalities of the female reproductive tract. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Boston
Junqueira BL, Allen LM, Spitzer RF (2009) Mullerian duct anomalies and mimics in children and adolescents: correlative intraoperative assessment with clinical imaging. Radiographics 29:1085–1103
Garel L, Dubois J, Grignon A et al (2001) US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics 21:1393–1407
Choi YH, Kim IO, Cheon JE et al (2009) Imperforate anus: determination of type using transperineal ultrasonography. Korean J Radiol 10:355–360
Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatri Surg 35:927–931
Anderson CC, Broadie TA, Mackey JE et al (1995) Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck: ultrasound appearance. Am Surg 61:959–961
Park SJ, Lee HK, Hong HS et al (2004) Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck in a girl: ultrasound and MR appearance. Br J Radiol 77:243–244
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Son, J.K., Taylor, G.A. Transperineal ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol 44, 193–201 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2789-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2789-8