Abstract
A total of 43 colonies of the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis from lagoonal and reef slope sites in the western Indian Ocean (WIO) region were genetically characterised at one nuclear and two mitochondrial sequence markers and six microsatellite loci. Both mitochondrial and microsatellite data support the existence of two reciprocally monophyletic clusters (F- and NF-types) and provide evidence of the existence of two cryptic species of P. damicornis on reefs in WIO region and put current morphological delineation and geographical boundaries of P. damicornis and Pocillopora molokensis into question. The results add to ongoing studies on the phylogeny and phylogeography within the genus Pocillopora, which all point towards a range of unresolved morphological and molecular species boundaries. Nuclear phylogenies derived from the present and previously published sequences show evidence for incomplete lineage sorting and/or introgressive hybridisation between Pocillopora morphospecies. However, the two WIO types largely remain in separate clusters, further supporting the theory that these represent two different species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Solid taxonomic units are crucial for corroborating evolutionary interpretations and support applications such as biodiversity estimates. It forms an integral part of both conservation efforts and sustainable management of habitats and is essential for testing evolutionary hypotheses. However, the accurate delineation of species by means of conventional methods and modern concepts is not always straightforward. This is mainly due to the occurrence morphologically indistinguishable (cryptic) or only a posterior distinguished (pseudo-cryptic) species (Sáez et al. 2003). Such complexes are considered rife throughout the marine realm as previously undescribed taxa are continuously being discovered within well-known taxonomic groups in our oceans (Knowlton 1993, 2000; Caputi et al. 2007).
Many coral species exhibit plastic growth forms whereby the shape of a colony varies, most commonly in response to variations in light intensity and wave movement (Todd 2008). In addition, factors such as interspecies hybridisation create a plethora of intermediate morphologies and genotypes, making species identification a daunting task (Vollmer and Palumbi 2002a). As a result, morphological and genetic delineations within and between many coral species are unsuccessful, both in massive (Miller and Babcock 1997; Miller and Benzie 1997; Lopez et al. 1999; Stobart 2000; Mangubhai et al. 2007b) and branching (van Oppen et al. 2000, 2002; Vollmer and Palumbi 2002b; Flot et al. 2008a) coral species. Indeed, the current classification of entire coral families is being questioned as new molecular data become available (Fukami et al. 2004b; Nunes et al. 2008).
Pocillopora damicornis, the target species of this study, is a common and extensively studied scleractinian coral that is found on coral reefs throughout the world. It forms part of the family Pocilloporidae, which constitute the majority of larval recruits onto reefs in the western Indian Ocean region (Mangubhai et al. 2007a). It is hermaphroditic and can reproduce both sexually and asexually. Sexual reproduction occurs either through internal brooding of the fertilised egg (Stoddart and Black 1985) or by broadcast spawning of both egg and sperm into the water column (Ward 1992). The timing of planulation varies across its geographical range (Harriott 1983; Stoddart 1983; Richmond and Jokiel 1984; Stoddart and Black 1985; Ward 1992; Schleyer et al. 1997). Asexual reproduction occurs through the ameiotic development of the larvae (parthenogenesis) (Stoddart 1983), or through fragmentation by mechanical force or partial colony mortality.
Like many corals, the morphology of P. damicornis is both variable and plastic (Veron 2000; Todd 2008), ranging from finely branched in deeper waters to robust in more exposed habitats. Furthermore, it has been found to hybridise with its congeners Pocillopora eydouxi and Pocillopora elegans in the Tropical Eastern Pacific (TEP) (Combosch et al. 2008) and with its family member Stylophora pistillata at Lord Howe Island, Australia (Miller and Ayre 2004). As a result, the delineation of taxonomic units within this and other species within the genus Pocillopora remains unresolved and represents an important future challenge. Indeed, the idea of cryptic species within P. damicornis is not new. A potential genetic distinction between brooding and non-brooding colonies was investigated by Sherman et al. (2006). However, the study revealed no indication of reproductive barriers. The hypothesis that two cryptic species of P. damicornis are present in Hawaii, initially suggested by differences in morphology and reproductive timing (Richmond and Jokiel 1984), was later supported by molecular data showing that Hawaiian P. damicornis harbour two distinct mtDNA haplotypes (Flot et al. 2008b). Genetic delineation, both within and between morphospecies, has also been found in the TEP, where P. damicornis falls into three distinct types, based on the internal transcribed spacer of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (Combosch et al. 2008).
During a study of the population genetic structure of P. damicornis on reefs in Kenya and Tanzania, the present author revealed that all clonal lineages were homozygous for a specific allele at one of the studied microsatellite loci (PV 7). This particular allele was rare or absent in populations that showed no signs of asexual reproduction, once again raising the hypothesis of cryptic speciation (Souter et al. 2009). However, both types correspond morphologically to P. damicornis as shown by Fig. 1, which depicts one colony of each type. In summary, P. damicornis exhibits a range of characteristics that make it an ideal model species to assess species boundaries as well as the influence of hybridisation in coral cryptic speciation events.
The aim of this study was to uncover whether cryptic genetic diversity exists within this species and to determine the level of genetic divergence between the Fixed (F-types) and Non Fixed (NF-types) PV 7 genotypes. This was undertaken by inferring phylogenies from fast-evolving nuclear and mitochondrial markers from a selection of Pocillopora species and geographical locations (Fig. 2). In addition, F- and NF-type colonies were genotyped at six polymorphic microsatellite loci.
Materials and methods
Samples
DNA from 26 F- and 19 NF-type colonies from 10 populations included in a previous connectivity study (Souter et al. 2009) were selected for genotyping. The colonies were randomly chosen from the data set, with at least one colony being selected from each sampled population. In addition, 20 F- and 4 NF-type colonies from previously unsampled sites in Kenya, Tanzania and Mauritius and four samples from the Central Great Barrier Reef were obtained and added to the data set, making a total of 73 colonies (Fig. 2).
DNA extractions and genotyping
DNA was extracted using the Qiagen® DNeasy kit according to a modified protocol for rodent tails (fragments were placed directly into lysis buffer and Proteinase K and kept in a water bath at 56°C over night). Extracted DNA was stored at −20°C.
Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA amplification and sequencing
The microsatellite locus PV7 is located within the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. As the results from the microsatellite genotyping indicate that this marker may be under differential selection in the Pocillopora damicornis types, a fragment of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (partial 5.8S, ITS2 and partial 28S) was sequenced using the primers published by Flot and Tillier (2006). The ITS1 region was excluded as the microsatellite region proved difficult to sequence and hence produced ambiguous alignments; in addition, using the published primers allowed easy comparisons to previously published sequences of pocilloporid corals (Combosch et al. 2008; Flot et al. 2008b). Flot et al. (2008b) showed that among four tested nuclear markers (ITS2, calmodulin, elongation factor 1α and ATP synthase β subunit), the ITS region provided the most unambiguous and informative phylogeny. However, it did not resolve all intraspecific relationships. Two mitochondrial regions were amplified using the primers (ORF and CR) developed by Flot and Tillier (2007). The first consisted of partial atp6 and an open reading frame (ORF) of unknown function and the second contained partial nad5, trnW, atp8, the putative D-loop and partial COX 1.
All sequencing reactions were set up in a 30 μl volume reaction containing 0.5 Scientifix Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl), 3 μl 10× PCR buffer (20 mM MgCl2), 40 pmol of each primer and 3 μl dNTPs (2.5 mM each) and 40 ng template DNA. The thermal cycling protocol was initiated with 5 min at 95°C followed by 30× (30 s at 95°C; 30 s at 55°C (CR) or 58°C (ORF and ITS) and 1 min at 72°C) and ended with a 10-min extension at 72°C.
PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Inc., Korea, using the same primers that had been used for the PCR reaction. Ambiguous sequences, and colonies that showed genotypes indicative of being heterozygote, were cloned into chemically competent E. coli cells using the Invitrogen TOPO© clone kit, and four to six positive colonies were re-sequenced using the universal M13 forward and reverse primers.
Microsatellite genotyping
A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using six fluorescently labelled microsatellite primers developed for Pocillopora spp: PV 6 and PV 7 (Magalon et al. 2004), and Pd3_002, Pd3_004, Pd2_006 and Pd3_005 (Starger et al. 2008). The PCR was conducted in 10 μl reactions using 25 ng of DNA, 0.25 U AmpliTaq© (Applied Biosystems) and a concentration of 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 0.1 mM of MgCl2 and 0.4 mM of each primer. The thermal cycling protocol was initiated with 5 min at 95°C followed by 30× (30 s at 95°C; 30 s at 53°C (PV 6 & PV 7) or 58°C (Pd3_002, Pd3_004, Pd2_006 and Pd3_005) and 1 min at 72°C) and ended with a 10-min extension at 72°C. Non-amplifying samples were re-run at a 5°C lower annealing temperature than those stated previously. PCR products as well as positive and negative controls were visualised on an ABI Prism 3700 DNA Analyzer (ABI, Applera Cooperation) together with a GeneScan 500-Rox ladder and genotyped automatically and verified manually using GeneMapper© version 4.0 software (ABI, Applera Cooperation).
Data analysis
Corresponding mitochondrial and rDNA sequences from 48 Pocillopora colonies were downloaded from the NCBI website and included in the alignments (Table 1). The two mitochondrial sequences were concatenated into a single alignment prior to further analyses. Both mitochondrial and nuclear sequences were aligned manually using MEGA ver. 3.1 (Kumar et al. 2004) and saved as nexus and Roehl format files using the programme DnaSP v 4.50.3 (Rozas et al. 2003). Roehl files were imported to the RDF editor in Network 4.1 (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/), which was used to check for sequencing errors and ambiguous SNPs.
The best fitting evolutionary model for each alignment was estimated using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) in MODELTEST v 3.07 (Posada and Crandall 1998), and a phylogeny was constructed using the inferred evolutionary constraints by the maximum likelihood calculation in PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford 2000) using the PaupUp graphical interface (Calendini and Martin 2005). Gaps were treated as missing data, and branch support levels were estimated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Best trees were found using the heuristic algorithm, and sequence divergence was estimated using the Kimura’s 2-parameter model. A comparative phylogeny was constructed using the maximum parsimony criteria. Resulting trees were imported into MEGA ver 3.1 where condensed trees were constructed by collapsing all branches that had bootstrap values below 0.5. All phylogenies were rooted using Pocillopora ligulata from Oahu as an outgroup.
Sequence divergence between groups of individuals, measured as pairwise F ST, was inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences using an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) in a similar manner to that used for the microsatellite data, using the programme Arlequin (Laval and Schneider 2005). Comparisons were made between the two types (F and NF), geographically distant populations that fell into the same phylogenetic cluster (F and P. damicornis from Oahu), as well as morphologically predefined species from the same geographical location (P. damicornis and P. meandrina from Oahu).
The microsatellite tool kit (Park 2001) was used to infer allelic and genetic diversity of F- and NF-types. A genetic distance between F- and NF-type colonies, measured as pairwise population differentiation, was estimated according to Cockerham and Weir (1984) using the AMOVA framework as implemented in Arlequin (Laval and Schneider 2005). The significance value was calculated using 10,000 non-parametric permutations. This procedure is appropriate when dealing with skewed sample sizes, as it does not assume normality or equality of variance among samples. The software Genetix (Belkir et al. 1996) was used to construct a principal component analysis (PCA) to visualise the genetic distance between the F- and NF-types using each locus as an independent binary variable according to She et al. (1987).
Results
Reliable sequences were obtained from a total of 43 colonies (25 F and 18 NF), at both mitochondrial and nuclear markers. To enable a comparison of the results derived from the nuclear and mitochondrial data, only those colonies that produced reliable data from all three amplifications were selected for this study. In general, the microsatellite and mitochondrial data produced more reliable and consistent results, while the ITS sequences often degenerated across large areas of repeated sequence or showed signs of high intercolony variation. Seven of the included F-type colonies belong to three clonal lineages and were included to verify whether sequence analysis corroborates multilocus genotyping results (Table 2).
Sequence analysis
Mitochondrial DNA
The concatenated mtDNA database consisted of 1,432 unambiguously aligned characters that contained 41 variable sites, of which 35 were parsimony informative (Table 3). A maximum likelihood (ML) tree, constrained with the best fitting evolutionary model (GTS), is shown in Fig. 3. Pocillopora damicornis specimens from Oahu and the GBR are genetically distinct and form a well-supported monophyletic clade which includes all F-type colonies. The latter is sister to a second clade formed by all NF-type colonies and P. molokensis from Oahu. The two P. damicornis types from the WIO are reciprocally monophyletic, independent of geographical location (Fig. 3). A type-specific 6-bp indel present at the mitochondrial D-loop region clearly separates the two types. However, one colony (F47) clearly clusters with the F-types, even though it contained the insertion that was otherwise unique to the NF-types. Genetic differentiation between (a) F- and NF-types sampled in sympatry, (b) geographically distant Pocillopora damicornis individuals and F-type colonies and (c) distinct morphological species from the same geographical location (P. damicornis and P. meandrina), measured as pairwise F ST values, is significantly different from 0 (P < 0.001). Interestingly, the level of genetic differentiation between the F- and the NF-types is higher than between pairs of each single type and predefined morphospecies clustering in the same clade with that type. F-type colonies from the Indian Ocean and P. damicornis from Oahu are more similar to each other than are pairs of morphologically distinct species in Oahu (Fig. 3, Table 4).
Nuclear ribosomal DNA
The partial 5.8s—complete ITS 2—partial 28s ribosomal subunit of the nuclear ribosomal DNA region consisted of 516 aligned characters (Table 3). The best fitting evolutionary model for the ITS ML phylogeny was found to be K80, and genetic distance was measured using Kimura’s 2-parameter model. ML and MP phylogenies inferred from this marker indicated the F- and NF-types of P. damicornis from the WIO form two genetically divergent clusters, with the exception of colony F29. The latter is found in a group of topologically unresolved species (Fig. 4). Four synapomorphic sites and an indel at the start of the ITS 2 differentiate the F-types from the NF-types with the exception of colony F29, which shows an intermediate haplotype. Subsequent cloning and sequencing of six clones carrying this amplification product indicated no evidence of it being heterozygote’s as all six sequences were identical. All three P. damicornis sequences from Oahu are interspersed with the F-types, indicating a complete lack of divergence in the nuclear marker between these two groups. Double bases, indicative of intercolony variation (heterozygosity), were detected in only four colonies. This may be caused by the fact that the majority of the sequences were derived from direct sequencing, which has been shown to capture only part of the interindividual variation of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (Vollmer and Palumbi 2004b). None of the variable sites were parsimony informative.
Microsatellite analysis
F-types from Mauritius were found to be homozygous for allele 222 rather than 224 at locus PV7, probably as a consequence of a step mutation within these particular populations. However, both the 222 and the 224 alleles were rare or absent among the NF-types (Table 5 and Appendix 1 in electronic supplementary material). In the population genetic study of the NF-types, these two loci occurred with an average frequency of 3.2 and 2.1%, respectively, and only in heterozygote form (Souter et al. 2009). Despite there being fewer NF-types genotyped, the genetic diversity of this type was significantly greater than that of the F-types (two-tailed paired t-test of HE per loci; P = 0.012; df 5) (Table 3). The level of genetic differentiation between the two types, measured as a pairwise FST, was high (0.232) and significantly different from 0 (P value < 0.0001; df 12). The Principal coordinate analysis plot (PCA) (Fig. 5) shows two distinct clusters of the F- and NF-types.
Discussion
Cryptic speciation
Sequence analysis and microsatellite genotyping corroborate the existence of two genetically distinct but morphologically cryptic lineages within what is currently described as Pocillopora damicornis in the western Indian Ocean. At times, these lineages are found in sympatry and may represent sibling species. The addition of previously obtained sequences in the mitochondrial data set shows a total of four mitochondrial lineages within this species complex, supporting the conclusions drawn by Flot et al. (2008b) that mitochondrial markers are able to resolve interspecific and intraspecific relationships among Pocillopora species and that sympatric cryptic lineages also exist in the Hawaiian archipelago.
The mitochondrial phylogeny further highlights the lack of congruence between morphological and phylogenetic species, whereby the F-type clusters with what is currently considered to be P. damicornis but the NF-type groups more closely with P. molokensis. P. molokensis is currently described as being found only in deep waters and geographically restricted to the mid-Pacific Ocean (Veron 2000). However, the present results would indicate that the current delineation between P. damicornis and P. molokensis needs revision. This lack of congruence between morphological and phylogenetic species has been shown also in Seriatopora corals (Flot et al. 2008a). Other morphologically recognised species within the genus Pocillopora form monophyletic assemblages and are also significantly differentiated according to the AMOVA analysis. In accordance with the inferred phylogeny, the pairwise F ST value between the two coexisting types from the WIO is substantially higher than that between the F-type and P. damicornis from Oahu. One colony (F47), which contained a 6-bp insertion otherwise unique to the NF-types, falls outside the P. damicornis cluster and may be the result of a hybridisation event.
Interlineage genetic variation is evident in both the F- and the NF-types. For instance, F28, F29 and F32 form a separate group of haplotypes within the F-type clade and they all originate in the same population; hence, this divergence may be correlated to geography. However, not all colonies from this particular population fall within this group. Moreover, the two clusters within the NF-types show no apparent phylogeographic pattern, indicating that the mitochondrial marker may not adequately resolve intraspecies population boundaries at smaller geographical scales.
Regarding the ensuing large scale phylogeographic patterns, it is interesting to note that the four distinct mitochondrial lineages within P. damicornis correspond to broad geographical locations, with the exception of one Oahu haplotype, which groups with samples from the GBR. Evidence of multiple species of P. damicornis has previously been reported from Hawaii, based both on reproductive differences (Richmond and Jokiel 1984) and the presence of divergent mitochondrial haplotypes (Flot et al. 2008b). It may thus be possible that the previously encountered mitochondrial lineages are derived from past or recent migrants from the South Pacific and may represent distinct biological species. This is further supported by differences in the lunar periodicity of reproduction (Richmond and Jokiel 1984). Migration across the Pacific by means such as rafting has been touted as a possibility (Jokiel 1984), and Pocillopora species are among the most commonly encountered rafting species in the Pacific (Jokiel 1989).
The low bootstrap values that separate the two types in the rDNA phylogeny, coupled with the position of colony F29, indicates that the ITS marker is not suitable to distinguish the two types. As with many other nuclear markers, the ribosomal DNA region is plagued by high intraspecific and intraindividual diversity in corals. In Acropora aspera, up to nine rDNA copies have been found in a single colony (van Oppen et al. 2002), and divergence among sequences within a single colony can be as high as 11.4% in the ITS 1 region and 3.8% in the 18s ribosomal gene (Vollmer and Palumbi 2004a). Much of this is thought to be the result of incomplete lineage sorting due to slow convergent evolution of unsorted ancestral polymorphisms, introgression between hybrid species (van Oppen et al. 2000, 2001; Combosch et al. 2008) and the existence of non-functional pseudo-genes of nuclear ribosomal DNA (Marquez et al. 2003). Conversely, a study of intraindividual and interindividual variation in the ITS 1 region of the pocilloporid coral Seriatopora hystrix showed that only 2% of the observed variation is intraindividual (Zvuloni et al. 2008), and in the study by Combosch et al. (2008), no more than two alleles of the ribosomal DNA marker were found in any one individual. In this study, obtaining good sequencing data from the ITS 2 region proved the most difficult. This difficulty may be attributed to a range of factors, including the existence of multi-copy genes and/or pseudo-genes, large intraindividual polymorphisms, hybridisation or further speciation. However, the 5.8s and 28s genes are highly conserved and phylogenetically uninformative in the Pocillopora, and the removal of the ITS 2 from the alignment created an entirely unresolved phylogeny (data not shown).
The other nuclear markers, the microsatellites, show a clear differentiation, indicating a lack of or very limited gene flow between the two types. The pairwise differentiation between the F- and NF-types (F ST = 0.232) can be put into context when compared with the degree of differentiation that has been reported between populations of the NF-type (F ST = 0.023), which was derived using the same markers and the same geographical locations (Souter et al. 2009). This distinct delineation remains also when using all 825 colonies that were originally genotyped at the microsatellite loci for the population genetic study. It is thus unlikely that the failed ITS sequences constitute hybrids between the two types, nor represent an additional cryptic species as this would have been apparent also in the microsatellite data.
The topological incongruence between mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies suggests incomplete lineage sorting and extensive hybridisation among the four mitochondrial lineages. However, both phylogenies are mostly congruent in their delineation of the F- and NF-types, something that strongly supports the theory of two reproductively isolated species within P. damicornis. The results indicate that F- and NF-types do not undergo hybridisation and may represent the only biologically distinct species within the Pocillopora damicornis species complex uncovered to date. Furthermore, both phylogenies group the NF-types with P. molokensis albeit this cluster remains unresolved for three species and four geographical regions in the ITS phylogeny. Combosch et al. (2008) inferred three ITS types (I, II and III) among Pocillopora corals in the tropical eastern and central western Pacific. The present phylogeny does not fall into any apparently comparable clusters, and neither the F- nor the NF-types are grouped with the TEP type III Pocillopora damicornis. While introgressive hybridisation is the most likely explanation for shared interspecies haplotypes in the TEP (Combosch et al. 2008), the idea of such hybridisation causing the lack of monophyletic groups in this study seems less plausible due to the large geographical distances and lack of geographical clustering. The present data set is not based on exhaustive sequencing and sampling to uncover all potential alleles of the ITS region, hence making an accurate prediction regarding the likelihood of introgressive hybridisation is not possible.
A significantly lower proportion of identical multi-locus genotypes in the NF-types than among the F-types was found in the population genetic data (Fisher’s exact test: P < 0.01). In total, 105 colonies out of 154 were found to belong to 14 clonal lineages in the F-types, while among the NF-types, only a single identical multi-locus genotype was encountered among 661 samples (Souter et al. 2009). This dual mode of reproduction in P. damicornis has been highlighted in studies from the GBR, where sexual reproduction was dominant in adult populations despite the fact that all brooded planulae were genetically identical to their brood parent (Ayre and Miller 2004; Sherman et al. 2006). Furthermore, a mix of brooding and broadcast spawning, occurring at different times of the year, has been reported from Western Australia (Ward 1992). However, it is not evident from the results if the broadcast spawning colonies were the same colonies as those producing brooded larvae. Such a difference in reproductive mode may explain the lower genetic diversity of the F-type colonies. Many earlier studies of P. damicornis have revealed a variable impact of asexual reproduction between sampled populations (Stoddart 1984a, b, 1986; Benzie et al. 1995; Ayre et al. 1997; Adjeroud and Tsuchiya 1999; Miller and Ayre 2004; Whitaker 2006). To date, populations dominated by identical multi-locus genotypes have only been recorded from reefs that can be considered disturbed (Sherman et al. 2006) or geographically marginal (Stoddart 1983, 1984a, 1986). However, not all disturbed or geographically marginal habitats show a prevalence of asexual reproduction, and there is no evidence that a correlation between habitat or disturbance and reproductive mode exists (Miller and Ayre 2004).
The extent of the genetic divergence between these two types on reefs in the WIO, and the fact that the F-types are more closely related to P. damicornis from distant geographical locations than to their “conspecifics” that were sampled on the same reef, indicates deep separation and a lack of gene flow between these types on an evolutionary time scale rather than one caused by current selection. The fact that these two cryptic species may coexist throughout the geographical range of the species complex coupled with increasing evidence of polyphyletic clades within Pocillopora (Combosch et al. 2008; Flot et al. 2008b) calls for caution in the interpretation of some of the results from previous studies. In addition, it is worth questioning the assumption that all these studies are based on the same species, which is something a more thorough phylogeographic study would resolve.
As with many other taxonomic groups of corals, such as the Acropora aspera group (van Oppen et al. 2002) and the Montastraea annularis group (Lopez et al. 1999; Fukami et al. 2004a), the Pocillopora corals show a complex pattern of morphological and phylogenetic species boundaries. Not surprisingly, much of the emerging molecular data is revealing a far greater diversity in corals than previously believed and, as a result, conventional taxonomic classification of corals is currently in question at the family (Fukami et al. 2004b; Nunes et al. 2008), to genera (Miller and Babcock 1997; Miller and Benzie 1997; van Oppen et al. 2001, 2002; Mangubhai et al. 2007b; Forsman et al. 2009) and down to the species levels (Stobart 2000; van Oppen et al. 2000). More often than not a clear link between genetic and morphological delineations is lacking, indicating that basing the taxonomy of corals on skeletal characters alone leads to inaccurate and more importantly underestimated predictions of the diversity of this order.
References
Adjeroud M, Tsuchiya M (1999) Genetic variation and clonal structure in the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis in the Ryukyu Archipelago, southern Japan. Mar Biol 134:753–760
Ayre DJ, Miller KJ (2004) Where do clonal coral larvae go? Adult genotypic diversity conflicts with reproductive effort in the brooding coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277:95–105
Ayre DJ, Hughes TP, Standish RJ (1997) Genetic differentiation, reproductive mode, and gene flow in the brooding coral Pocillopora damicornis along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159:175–187
Belkir K, Borosa P, Goudete J, Chiki L, Bonhomme F (1996) Genetix, Logiciel sous Windows™ pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interaction. CNRS IMR 5000. Universite Montpellier II, Montpellier
Benzie JAH, Haskell A, Lehman H (1995) Variation in the genetic composition of coral (Pocillopora damicornis and Acropora palifera) populations from different reef habitats. Mar Biol 121:731–739
Calendini F, Martin J-F (2005) PaupUp: a free graphical frontend for Paup Dos software
Caputi L, Andreakis N, Mastrototaro F, Cirino P, Vassillo M, Sordino P (2007) Cryptic speciation in a model invertebrate chordate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9364–9369
Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1984) Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics 40:157–164
Combosch DJ, Guzman HM, Schuhmacher H, Vollmer SV (2008) Interspecific hybridization and restricted trans-Pacific gene flow in the Tropical Eastern Pacific Pocillopora. Mol Ecol 17:1304–1312
Flot J, Tillier S (2006) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the scleractinian coral genus Pocillopora in Hawaii 10th International Coral Reef Symposium Okinawa, pp 24–29
Flot JF, Tillier S (2007) The mitochondrial genome of Pocillopora (Cnidaria : Scleractinia) contains two variable regions: the putative D-loop and a novel ORF of unknown function. Gene 401:80–87
Flot JF, Licuanan WY, Nakano Y, Payri C, Cruaud C, Tillier S (2008a) Mitochondrial sequences of Seriatopora corals show little agreement with morphology and reveal the duplication of a tRNA gene near the control region. Coral Reefs 27:789–794
Flot JF, Magalon H, Cruaud C, Couloux A, Tillier S (2008b) Patterns of genetic structure among Hawaiian corals of the genus Pocillopora yield clusters of individuals that are compatible with morphology. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331:239–247
Forsman Z, Barshis D, Hunter C, Toonen R (2009) Shape-shifting corals: molecular markers show morphology is evolutionarily plastic in Porites. BMC Evol Biol 9:45
Fukami H, Budd AF, Levitan DR, Jara J, Kersanach R, Knowlton N (2004a) Geographic differences in species boundaries among members of the Montastrea annularis complex based on molecular and morphological markers. Evolution 58:234–337
Fukami H, Budd AF, Paulay G, Sole-Cava A, Chen CLA, Iwao K, Knowlton N (2004b) Conventional taxonomy obscures deep divergence between Pacific and Atlantic corals. Nature 427:832–835
Harriott VJ (1983) Reproductive ecology of four scleractinian species at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 2:9–18
Jokiel P (1984) Long distance dispersal of reef corals by rafting. Coral Reefs 3:113–116
Jokiel P (1989) Rafting of reef corals and other organisms at Kwajalein Atoll. Mar Biol 101:483–493
Knowlton N (1993) Sibling species in the sea. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:189–216
Knowlton N (2000) Molecular genetic analyses of species boundaries in the sea. Hydrobiologia 420:73–90
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA 3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Breif Bioinform 5:150–163
Laval LG, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50
Lopez JV, Kersanach r, Rehner SA, Knowlton N (1999) Molecular determination of species boundaries in corals: genetic analysis of the Montastrea annularis complex using amplified fragment length polymorphisms and a microsatellite marker. Biol Bull 196:80–93
Magalon H, Samadi S, Richard M, Adjeroud M, Veuille M (2004) Development of coral and zooxanthella-specific microsatellites in three species of Pocillopora (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) from French Polynesia. Mol Ecol Notes 4:206–208
Mangubhai S, Harrison PL, Obura DO (2007a) Patterns of coral larval settlement on lagoon reefs in the Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 348:149–159
Mangubhai S, Souter P, Grahn M (2007b) Phenotypic variation in the coral Platygyra daedalea in Kenya: morphometry and genetics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 345:105–115
Marquez LM, Miller DJ, MacKenzie JB, van Oppen MJH (2003) Pseudogenes contribute to the extreme diversity of nuclear ribosomal DNA in the hard coral Acropora. Mol Biol Evol 20:1077–1086
Miller KJ, Ayre DJ (2004) The role of sexual and asexual reproduction in structuring high latitude populations of the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis. Heredity 92:557–568
Miller K, Babcock R (1997) Conflicting morphological and reproductive species boundaries in the coral genus Platygyra. Biol Bull 192:98–110
Miller KJ, Benzie JAH (1997) No clear genetic distinction between morphological species within the coral genus Platygyra. Bull Mar Sci 61:907–917
Nunes F, Fukami H, Vollmer SV, Norris RD, Knowlton N (2008) Re-evaluation of the systematics of the endemic corals of Brazil by molecular data. Coral Reefs 27:423–432
Park SDE (2001) Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection
Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818
Richmond RH (1987) Energetic relationships and biogeographical differences among fecundity, growth and reproduction in the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis. Bull Mar Sci 41:594–604
Richmond RH, Jokiel PL (1984) Lunar periodicity in larva released in the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis at Enewetak and Hawaii. Bull Mar Sci 34:280–287
Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496–2497
Sáez AG, Probert I, Geisen M, Quinn P, Young JR, Medlin LK (2003) Pseudo-cryptic speciation in coccolithophores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7163–7168
Schleyer MH, Kruger A, Benayahu Y (1997) Reproductive strategies of South African corals. In: den Hartog JC, van Ofwegen LP, van der Spoel S (eds) 6th International conference of coelenterate biology, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 429–435
She J, Autem M, Kotoulas G, Pasteru N, Bonhomme F (1987) Multivariate analysis of genetic exchange between Solea aegyptiaca and Sloea senelagensis (Teleosts, Soleidae). Biol J Linn Soc 32:357–371
Sherman CDH, Ayre DJ, Miller KJ (2006) Asexual reproduction does not produce clonal populations of the brooding coral Pocillopora damicornis on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 25:7–18
Souter P, Henriksson O, Olsson N, Grahn M (2009) Patterns of genetic structuring in the coral Pocillopora damicornis on reefs in East Africa. BMC Ecol 9:19
Starger CJ, Yeoh SSR, Dai CF, Baker AC, Desalle R (2008) Ten polymorphic STR loci in the cosmopolitan reef coral, Pocillopora damicornis. Mol Ecol Res 8:619–621
Stobart B (2000) A taxonomic reappraisal of Montipora digitata based on genetic and morphometric evidence. Zool Stud 39:179–190
Stoddart JA (1983) Asexual production of planulae in the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 76:279–284
Stoddart JA (1984a) Genetic differentiation amongst populations of the coral Pocillopora damicornis off Southwestern Australia. Coral Reefs 3:149–156
Stoddart JA (1984b) Genetical structure within populations of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 81:19–30
Stoddart JA (1986) Biochemical genetics of Pocillopora damicornis in Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. In: Joikel PL, Richmond RH, Rogers RA (eds) Coral reef population biology. Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, Oahu, pp 133–148
Stoddart JA, Black R (1985) Cycles of gametogenesis and planulation in the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 23:153–164
Swofford DL (2000) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Todd PA (2008) Morphological plasticity in scleractinian corals. Biol Rev 83:315–337
van Oppen MJH, Willis BL, van Vugt H, Miller DJ (2000) Examination of species boundaries in the Acropora cervicornis group (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) using nuclear DNA sequence analyses. Mol Ecol 9:1363–1373
van Oppen MJH, McDonald BJ, Willis B, Miller DJ (2001) The evolutionary history of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and a nuclear marker: reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence? Mol Biol Evol 18:1315–1329
van Oppen MJH, Willis BL, Van Rheede T, Miller DJ (2002) Spawning times, reproductive compatibilities and genetic structuring in the Acropora aspera group: evidence for natural hybridization and semi-permeable species boundaries in corals. Mol Ecol 11:1363–1376
Veron J (2000) Corals of the world. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville
Vollmer S, Palumbi SR (2002) Hybridization and the evolution of reef coral diversity. Science 296:2023–2025
Vollmer S, Palumbi S (2004) Testing the utility of internally transcribed spacer sequences in coral phylogenetics. Mol Ecol 13:2763–2772
Ward S (1992) Evidence for broadcast spawning as well as brooding in the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 112:641–646
Whitaker K (2006) Genetic evidence for mixed modes of reproduction in the coral Pocillopora damicornis and its effect on population structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 306:115–124
Zvuloni A, Mokady O, Al-Zibdah M, Bernardi G, Gaines SD, Abelson A (2008) Local scale genetic structure in coral populations: a signature of selection. Mar Pollut Bull 56:430–438
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by grants from the Swedish Development Cooperation Agency, the western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association and in-kind contributions from Sodertorn University College and the Australian Institute of Marine Science. Collections were made by the author, O. Henriksson, N. Olssson, S. Said, R. Moothien-Pillay and S. Visram. A proportion of the DNA extractions was made by staff and students at CORDIO-EA. The author would especially like to acknowledge N. Andreakis for discussions and help regarding constructing phylogenies, interpretation and presentation of the data, L. Tynan for language editing and T. Simmonds for producing maps and figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Reusch.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Souter, P. Hidden genetic diversity in a key model species of coral. Mar Biol 157, 875–885 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1370-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1370-3