Abstract
Sarcophyton elegans is a common symbiotic (zooxanthellate) octocoral species in the shallow waters of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Study of a population at Lizard Island (14°40′S, 145°28′E) on the GBR from October 1991 to January 1994 revealed that, as is typical of tropical alcyonarian corals, S. elegans is a gonochoric broadcast spawner with a 1:1 sex ratio. Sexual reproduction was closely correlated with colony size, with first reproduction at 13-cm basal stalk circumference for females and 12 cm for males. Oogenesis took 19–24 months, with a new cycle commencing every year, and spermatogenesis took 10–12 months. The majority of gametes were released during the annual austral mass coral spawning event after the full moon in November, but gametes were also released after the full moon in each month between August and February. All autozooid polyps participated in reproduction, but those at the outer edge of a colony released their gametes first. During subsequent months, the polyps closer to the center of the colony released their gametes. This is a novel strategy of gamete release, reported here for the first time, which accommodates the demands of feeding and reproduction in a different way than other corals where individual polyps have separate feeding or reproductive roles. Colonies upstream in the prevailing current spawned up to 1 month earlier than those downstream and ceased 1 month earlier. The mechanism controlling this spatial differentiation in spawning time, repeatedly observed over three seasons, is unknown. Sarcophyton elegans appears to have a dual strategy of providing protection for its gametes by releasing most of them concurrently with the single, annual mass spawning of a large number of cnidarians, while also hedging its bets by individual colonies spawning a fraction of their gametes over an extended period of 6 months.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The mode and timing of reproduction are key life history characteristics that influence the population dynamics, ecology and evolution of organisms (Stearns 1992), but major characteristics of reproduction remain unknown for many marine species. For example, while most hard corals are hermaphroditic (Carlon 1999), it has only been established relatively recently that alcyonarian octocorals are primarily gonochoric (having separate males and females), (reviewed by Benayahu 1997; Hwang and Song 2007). Timing of reproduction is variable among corals, but the limited data available show that alcyonarians have continuous gametogenesis, internal fertilization and brooding of developing embryos more frequently in temperate waters (Gohar 1940; Hartnoll 1975; Farrant 1986; Cordes et al. 2001; McFadden et al. 2001). In contrast, the tropical octocorals studied to date more frequently exhibit short seasonal synchronous spawning periods with external fertilization (Benayahu and Loya 1984; Alino and Coll 1989; Benayahu et al. 1990; Benayahu 1997; Slattery et al. 1999).
Octocorals (Cnidaria: Alcyonacea) have several modes of asexual reproduction including budding, colony fragmentation and asexual production of planulae (Fautin 2002), as well as three different modes of sexual reproduction including internal brooding (Achituv and Benayahu 1990), external surface brooding of planular larvae (Dinesen 1985; Benayahu et al. 1990; Coma et al. 1995), and broadcast spawning of gametes with fertilization taking place in the water column (Alino and Coll 1989; Babcock et al. 1990; Benayahu 1997). The mode of reproduction and length of breeding season vary both within a genus (Hartnoll 1975; Dahan and Benayahu 1997; Hwang and Song 2007) and within a species (Benayahu and Loya 1986; Schleyer et al. 2004) depending on the geographical location of the corals.
The variety of modes of reproduction revealed by a relatively small set of studies, usually limited in spatial and temporal extent, suggests that more detailed studies are required to better document the reproductive strategies of octocoral species. However, comprehensive long term datasets on timing and mode of coral reproduction are extremely rare (Bastidas et al. 2002; Fuchs et al. 2006).
The fleshy octocorals of the order Alcyonacea comprise a major component of the benthic community, second only to the scleractinian reef-building corals, on the GBR (Dinesen 1983; Fabricius and Alderslade 2001). Sarcophyton species in the GBR region are widespread, and S. elegans is a common member of the alcyonarian community found in shallow lagoons and reef flats throughout the GBR, often appearing in large monospecific aggregations (Hellström, unpublished data). While larvae of alcyonarians are not easy to identify, adults and juveniles of S. elegans are relatively easy to distinguish from other Sarcophyton species by morphology and by examining the microscopic sclerites, which are species specific (Fabricius and Alderslade 2001). The colonies are mushroom shaped, and the disc-like polyp-bearing region (the polypary) has two different kinds of polyps; large autozooids that bear tentacles and smaller, more numerous siphonozooids lacking obvious tentacles (Fabricius and Alderslade 2001).
This study documents in detail the sex, sex ratio, gametogenesis, and mode of sexual reproduction in a Lizard Island population of this ecologically important species of octocoral on Australia’s GBR over 2.5 years.
Materials and methods
Study sites
This study sampled two sites with high abundance of Sarcophyton elegans near Lizard Island (14°40′S, 145°28′E) on the northern GBR (Fig. 1). Site A was on shallow Loomis Reef at the western entrance of the Lizard Island lagoon. Site B was on a small wave-exposed patch reef between South Island and Palfrey Island of the Lizard Island group. The water depth at both sites ranged from 3 m at high tide to total exposure during maximum low tide in the austral spring. All field observations and collections were performed by snorkeling or SCUBA.
At each study site, three 1 × 10 m belt-transects, marked by metal rods at each corner, were laid down end to end on the reef where the density of S. elegans colonies seemed highest (Fig. 1). The transect lines were oriented parallel to the current direction in order to assess the effects of spawning by upstream colonies on the reproductive behavior of those downstream (e.g., see Slattery et al. 1999). In December 1991, sizes of all the colonies within the transects were measured to determine colony size distribution. The 50 colonies collected to determine the size at first reproduction, and the 20 colonies subjected to detailed histological analysis, were collected from aggregations of octocorals outside the transects on the study reef.
Colony sexual identity, sex ratio, and size at onset of sexual reproduction
Since certain members of the genus Sarcophyton exhibit regional variation in reproductive modes (Benayahu and Loya 1986; Alino and Coll 1989; Schleyer et al. 2004), the first priority was to determine whether the corals were gonochoric or hermaphroditic. In October 1991, several weeks before the predicted coral annual mass spawning (e.g., Harrison and Wallace 1990), a small incision was made in the polypary of each colony within all transects (a total of 334 colonies), thereby exposing the mesenteries containing white sperm sacs or pink/red oocytes (Alino and Coll 1989) allowing the colonies to be sexed. Sex of the colonies was recorded, and sex ratio was tested for any deviation from 1:1 using the Chi-square test.
To determine the minimum colony size at onset of first reproduction and sexual maturity, 50 colonies of different size classes were collected outside the transect lines prior to the spawning season in 1992. The basal circumferences of the stalks of the colonies were used to compare colony size because polypary diameter and height within colonies varied considerably with tidal levels and time of day (Hellström, unpublished data). The collection was biased toward smaller colonies in order to detect the smallest size at maturity. The colonies were sectioned in the laboratory with a scalpel, and their sexual condition was established by examining them under a light microscope to detect the presence of gametes. Histological samples in the smaller colonies were processed as described below in order to confirm the absence of gametes in the colonies that appeared to be immature.
Gametogenic cycle
To determine the length of the gametogenic cycle, 10 large male colonies and 10 large female colonies (>20 cm in stalk circumference) outside the transects at sites A and B were numbered with plastic markers and subjected to detailed histological analysis. The marked colonies were sampled approximately monthly between October 1991 and January 1994, by cutting off a small rectangular piece of tissue (1 cm3) from the polypary with a sharp scalpel, as outlined by Benayahu and Loya (1986). All samples were preserved in 10% formalin in seawater (v/v) for 3 days and then transferred to 70% ethanol for further analysis. The samples were decalcified for 10 min using formic acid and sodium citrate (Winsor 1984). Diameters of the oocytes and spermaries were measured with a micrometer under a compound microscope. Fresh samples were examined under a stereomicroscope to establish the color difference between mature and immature gonads. Three paraffin sections from each sample (6 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin following Winsor (1984) for histological analysis to determine the stages of gonadal development. The gametogenic cycle was determined according to descriptions by Glynn et al. (1991) and Schleyer et al. (2004).
The effects of frequent cutting were examined using 10 mature colonies tagged with plastic markers. A cut in the oral disc (1 cm long and 1 cm deep) was made in five of these colonies every third day for 4 weeks, and five were left intact as controls. At the end of 4 weeks, gamete production was measured in both groups, and a t-test was used to determine whether there was any significant effect of cutting on colony gamete production.
Temporal spawning dynamics
The positions of the colonies along the belt transects were recorded and their reproductive state was noted monthly from October 1991 to January 1994. The colonies were monitored every 2 weeks for spawning activity after both the full moon and new moon, between August and March 1992 and 1993 and in January 1994, as higher reproductive activity occurred in those months. To obtain information on the spatial distribution of immature, mature and spawned mesenteries in individual polyparies, incisions were made at several points along the radius of the polypary to expose the mesenteries. These were then identified as either translucent with undeveloped gametes, white with mature sperm sacs, pink/red with mature oocytes or as spent mesenteries with no gametes. A colony was recorded to have released its gametes when ripe gametes were recorded as present during a census and absent at the next sampling event. Colonies were observed releasing eggs and sperm on three separate dates, and the detailed times of gamete release within the transects were recorded at site A only, for logistic reasons.
Results
Colony sexual identity, sex ratio, and size at onset of reproduction
Gross anatomical and histological examinations revealed that the study population of Sarcophyton elegans was gonochoric; that is, individual colonies were either male or female. Of the 334 colonies that fell within the transects at both study sites, 121 were females, 162 were males, and 51 were inactive and therefore could not be sexed. At the end of the survey 285 of the 334 mapped colonies remained, indicating 85% survival. The mean number of females over all transects was 40 (to nearest whole number), and mean number of males was 54. The ratio of males to females, using the mean from the six transects, did not significantly deviate from 1:1 (1-proportion analysis, x = 40, n = 94, P = 0.180).
The minimum basal circumference of females containing their first batch of white immature oocytes was 13 cm at site B and 14 cm at site A. The minimum basal circumference of sexually mature males was 12 cm at both sites. However, many colonies 14 and 15 cm in basal circumference were not sexually mature, whereas most colonies measuring 16 cm and above were sexually mature (Fig. 2). During the study, many of the colonies underwent vegetative growth by either binary fission or by the production of buds that developed at the edges of the polypary. Bud formation was observed during every census, seemed to be independent of season, and took about 6 months. Buds developed into miniature colonies and, after forming high densities of sclerites at the bases, fell off the parent colonies. The buds landed upright on the substratum as a result of their heavy, sclerite-dense base, and some of the buds contained gametes of mature color. However, during the following spawning season, buds that measured 8–13 cm in basal circumference did not contain mature gametes.
Gamete development
Gametogenic cycles of 10 colonies of each sex were followed in detail. In a pilot test, there was no significant difference in production between cut and intact colonies (n = 10, t = 0.35, P > 0.05) indicating that repeated tissue sampling did not affect gamete production.
Fresh oocytes were white when immature, changing to pink, or occasionally dark red, at maturity. The immature sperm sacs were translucent-gray and turned white at maturity. After preservation in formalin, both male and female gonads became pale orange. The gonads were found in the autozooids only. At early developmental stages, the gonads were attached to the mesenteries by pedicles.
The oocytes could be differentiated into four oogenic stages (as described by Glynn et al. 1991 and Schleyer et al. 2004) and oocytes of different developmental states occurred simultaneously (Fig. 3a). Stage I oocytes appeared in the autozooid polyps in February and were present until July. The Stage II oocytes were present between April and November and were attached to the mesenteries by pedicles (Fig. 3b). The Stage III oocytes were present in all months, were not connected to the mesenteries by pedicles and were close to the polyp cavity. Stage IV oocytes were granular in texture as a result of evenly distributed vacuoles (Schleyer et al. 2004), with the nucleus at the periphery of the cell (Fig. 3b, c). The Stage IV ova were observed in polyps at the outer edge of the colonies just before the full moon in August and September; during subsequent months, Stage IV oocytes were found in polyps closer to the center of the polypary (Table 1). The Stage IV oocytes were not observed after the last spawning event of the season in February. Each month between October 1991 and February 1994, there were two distinct size cohorts of oocytes, with the diameters of both cohorts increasing over time. This pattern indicates that a new oogenic cycle commences every year (Fig. 4a) and that oogenesis takes 20–22 months. The oocytes along the margins of colonies matured and were spawned up to 5 months earlier than gonads in the center of the same colony (Table 1). Mature ova were 450–620 μm in diameter.
The spermaries developed in 10–12 months, and the mature sperm sacs measured 300–450 μm prior to spawning (Fig. 4b). The reproductive male polyps mainly contained spermaries at similar stages of development in contrast to the female colonies, which had two parallel cohorts of developing oocytes. Classification of spermary development was determined according to Glynn et al. (1991) and Schleyer et al. (2004). Stage I and Stage II spermaries appeared in February and March and increased slowly in size until August when they reached Stage III (Fig. 5). The spermaries in polyps at the edge of the polypary reached Stage IV by August and September and did not contain gametes in October through February. The spermaries in polyps closer to the center of the colonies matured into Stage IV gradually from October until January or February.
Temporal spawning dynamics
Visual observations in the field and laboratory revealed that spawning occurred 5 and 6 days after a full moon, approximately 4–5 h after sunset each month from August to February. The positively buoyant eggs from the female colonies ascended first, followed by clouds of sperm from the male colonies. Gamete release from a colony during a spawning event lasted for up to 2 h.
Assessment of the mesenteries from incisions into a polypary showed that polyps at the edges of the polypary released a fraction of their gametes in August, and had released all gametes by after the full moon in October. This was 1 month before the annual mass spawning event in November, and no gametes could be observed in this region of the polypary in the weeks prior to the annual mass spawning event. Partial gamete release continued from autozooids located progressively closer to the center of the polypary until the mass-spawning event after the full moon in November, when large quantities of eggs and sperm were released into the surrounding water. The remaining mature gametes were released 5 days after the full moons in December and January, as determined by underwater observations.
Male and female colonies were not randomly dispersed, but were found in groups of the same sex (Fig. 6). The close proximity of many colonies of the same sex suggests that these were clones produced by vegetative propagation. Each group contained 5–34 mature colonies, adding up to 20 groups in total over both sites. Five to six days after each full moon from August through February each of these colony-groups spawned in synchrony (releasing gametes relatively slowly over approximately 2-h periods). Direct observation of spawning showed that gamete release occurred first in upstream colony-groups and progressively later in downstream colony-groups in every spawning period. Each subsequent group started spawning about 10 min after the adjacent upstream one (Fig. 6). Although tidal flows around Lizard Island are not well understood, the net current over the transects, while varying in intensity, was in the same direction at each spawning observation.
Spawning also differed between upstream and downstream colony-groups on longer time scales (Table 1).The colonies furthest downstream made their first gamete release of the season 1 month after the ones upstream (i.e. the upstream colony-groups first spawned in August, but further downstream colony-groups started the spawning season in September). Similarly, the downstream colony-groups continued spawning until February, while the final spawning of the upstream colony-groups occurred in January (Table 1).
Discussion
This study showed that Sarcophyton elegans on the GBR is a broadcast spawner with stable gonochorism (sensu Giese and Pearse 1974) and an overall sex ratio that did not deviate significantly from 1:1. In this respect, the GBR populations of S. elegans are like the majority of alcyonarian octocorals where gonochorism is the rule than the exception (Benayahu 1997), 1:1 sex ratios are usually observed (e.g., Grigg 1977; Benayahu and Loya 1986; Ribes et al. 2007), and, as in the majority of species in the Alcyoniidae and Nephtheidae, the gametes are released by broadcast spawning (reviewed by Benayahu 1997; Hwang and Song 2007). The gonad structures in S. elegans were similar to S. glaucum in the Red Sea (Benayahu and Loya 1986) and South Africa (Schleyer et al. 2004). However, no hermaphroditic colonies were detected within the GBR study sites. Either they were so few that they were not discovered or they did not exist. In contrast, data from a South African population of S. glaucum (Schleyer et al. 2004), a Mediterranean population of the stable gonochoric gorgonian octocoral Eunicella singularis (Ribes et al. 2007) and the octocoral Carijoa riisei in Hawaii (Kahng et al. 2008) showed a low incidence of hermaphroditism in predominantly gonochoric populations.
Most sex ratio estimates in octocorals are based on sampling a single location, but it has been shown in the gorgonian corals Paramuricea clavata and E. singularis that sex ratios can vary between locations (Gori et al. 2007). A higher frequency of females to males has been reported in some octocoral species (summarized by Ribes et al. 2007) and in the Mediterranean octocoral Corallium rubrum (Santangelo et al. 2003). Higher frequencies of males to females have also been documented, for example in Xenia macrospiculata (Benayahu and Loya 1984), Briaerum asbestinum (Brazeau and Lasker 1992) and in some populations of P. clavata (Gori et al. 2007).
Sexual reproduction appears strictly size dependent in S. elegans in the GBR population, demonstrated in this study by a minimum size for sexually mature colonies (12 cm basal circumference in males and 13 cm in females), the absence of gametes from many larger colonies with stalks up to 15 cm diameter, and the absence of gametes in colonies derived from buds <15 cm diameter that had possessed mature gametes in the previous year when they first detached from their parent colony. Size dependent sexual maturity is relatively common in colonial marine invertebrates and may be a strategy to allocate energy resources to growth in young colonies, and hence avoid the high risk of mortality associated with small colony size (e.g. Harvell and Grosberg 1988; Babcock 1991; Gutierrez-Rodriguez and Lasker 2004). Rapid early growth would also reduce the possibility of being shaded by nearby larger colonies. Although size-specific predation mortality is not reported for any octocorals, overall predation mortality can be high. On the outer GBR, predation as a known cause of death accounted for 69% of mortality in Sarcophyton spp. colonies (Fabricius 1995). Species such as the gastropod Ovula ovum (Coll et al. 1983) and the butterflyfish Chaetedon unimaculatus (Slattery et al. 2001) are reported octocoral predators.
Sarcophyton elegans on the GBR exhibited prolonged oogenesis over 20–22 months, which gave rise to two main cohorts of oocytes of different developmental stages in female colonies at any given time, and a spermatogenic cycle of only 10–12 months. These features are shared with S. glaucum in the Red Sea (Benayahu and Loya 1986, Fig. 3), Lobophyton crassum in Okinawa (Yamazato et al. 1981), and Sinularia polydactyla in Guam (Slattery et al. 1999).
A trade-off between feeding and reproduction has been proposed in cnidarians, in which the polyps on the outer edge of the colony are not gametogenic and are involved in feeding, while polyps nearer to the center are gametogenic (e.g., Hall and Hughes 1996). This differentiation is distinct in anemones (Francis 1976) and hydrozoans (Harvell 1984) but less apparent in corals (Veron 1993). A study on scleractinian corals less than a month prior to the mass spawning event in Australia indicated that some coral species showed no gametogenic activity in peripheral polyps (Hall and Hughes 1996). Zones of active growth in octocorals have also been associated with reduced fecundity (Brazeau and Lasker 1990). The reproductive cycle in mature octocorals can reduce feeding activity, as the mature oocytes in the brooding coral obstruct the coelenteron and thus limit polyp feeding, as described for Heliopora coerulea (Babcock 1990) and the brooding octocoral, Thouarella variabilis, where a single larva may occupy up to 80% of the polyp cavity (Brito et al. 1997).
The discovery that all autozooids in S. elegans are involved in reproduction but show differential timing of development and release of gametes across the polypary represents a new way of accommodating the demands of feeding and reproduction. Previous studies either do not indicate that they have sampled different parts of the polyparies, or have specifically stated that they did not. The lack of previous reports of this pattern of gamete release in other species may therefore reflect differences in methods of observation rather than reflecting its absence.
In free-spawning marine invertebrates with sexual dimorphism, female reproductive success is limited by sperm availability and male reproductive success by fertilization rates (Levitan 1996). In S. elegans on Lizard Island, gamete release was synchronized over the shorter time scales of gamete release by the spawning of one colony appearing to stimulate others downstream to release their gametes, thereby possibly increasing the probability of fertilization success in the colonies. Progressive downstream spawning over short time scales has been observed previously in scleractinian (Atkinson and Atkinson 1992) and alcyonarian corals (Slattery et al. 1999), and is thought to result from pheromone signaling between colonies (Atkinson and Atkinson 1992; Slattery et al. 1999; Tarrant 2005).
In the GBR S. elegans population, however, upstream colonies started to spawn earlier in the season by up to 1 month, and the downstream colonies continued to spawn for up to a month after the most-upstream colonies had completed spawning. The mechanism controlling this spatial differentiation in spawning time, repeatedly observed over three seasons, is unknown.
The period over which S. elegans spawns on the GBR fits with reproductive modes typically ascribed to tropical species of alcyonarians. The tropical spawning pattern is generally characterized by short, seasonal, synchronous spawning periods with external fertilization as opposed to the temperate pattern of continuous gametogenesis, internal fertilization and brooding of developing embryos (Kruger et al. 1998). However, in S. elegans the spawning was spread over a significantly longer period (7 months) than is reported for most tropical alcyonarians. Alino and Coll (1989) reported that many ocotocorals on the GBR take part in the short, synchronized annual mass spawning event in the austral spring. This event typically takes place 2–6 days after the full moon in November, although a split-spawning over two consecutive lunar cycles when the full moon fell late or early in the month has been reported (Harrison et al. 1984; Babcock et al. 1986). More recently, protracted spawning patterns in mass spawning scleractinian corals have been reported from Japan where spawning occurred after the full moon during two consecutive months (Hayashibara et al.1993), as well as from Barrow Island and Dampier Archipelago in Western Australia where four Acropora spp. spawned both in the austral fall, i.e. March to April and in the spring to early summer, i.e. October to December (Rosser and Gilmour 2008) and in Palau multiple spawning events took place two to three times in different months (Penland et al. 2004). In Venezuela, Bastidas et al. (2005) reported two to three spawning events in scleractinian corals and in gorgonian octocorals over 2–3 months.
Synchronous development and release of a large number of gametes by individuals in a population may reduce the risk of predation by overwhelming the predators’ capacity to feed on the gametes and by diluting the individual risk of predation (Babcock et al. 1986; Richmond and Hunter 1990). The synchronization of spawning may also be important to facilitate higher fertilization success (Lasker et al. 1996; Levitan 1996). Conversely, a presumed advantage of multiple spawning events is to escape the effects of a single catastrophic event on a population’s reproductive success (Richmond and Hunter 1990). Sarcophyton elegans appears to have both strategies, and to have achieved this by differential gamete release over the polypary and differential timing of spawning among colonies.
The extremely high level of temporal and spatial structuring in sexual reproduction seen in only a 30-m transect of octocoral colonies is remarkable. The novel aspects of sexual reproduction in S. elegans, including a prolonged, 7-month, split-spawning from August to February and a progressively more central release of gametes across the polypary, suggest that many fundamental aspects of coral ecology are yet to be discovered.
References
Achituv Y, Benayahu Y (1990) Polyp dimorphism and functional sequential hermaphrodism the soft coral Heteroxenia fuscescens (Octocorallia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 64:263–269
Alino PM, Coll JC (1989) Observations on the synchronized mass spawning and postsettlement activity of octocorals on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: biological aspects. B Mar Sci 45:697–707
Atkinson S, Atkinson MJ (1992) Detection of estradiol-17b during a mass coral spawn. Coral Reefs 11:33–35
Babcock RC (1990) Reproduction and development of the blue coral Heliopora coerulea (Alcyonaria: Coenothecalia). Mar Biol 104:475–481
Babcock RC (1991) Comparative demography of three species of scleractinian corals using age and size dependent classifications. Ecol Monogr 61:225–244
Babcock RC, Bull GD, Harrison PL, Heyward AJ, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL (1986) Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 90:379–394
Bastidas C, Benzie JAH, Fabricius KE (2002) Genetic differentiation among populations of the brooding soft coral Clavularia koellikeri on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 21:233–241
Bastidas C, Cróquer A, Zubillaga AL, Ramos R, Kortnik V, Weinberger C, Márquez LM (2005) Coral mass- and split-spawning at a coastal and an Offshore Venezuelan Reefs, southern Caribbean. Hydrobiologia 541:101–106
Benayahu Y (1997) Developmental episodes in reef soft corals: ecological and cellular determinants. Proceedings of the 8th international coral reef symposium 2:1213–1218
Benayahu Y, Loya Y (1984) Life history studies on the Red Sea octocoral Xenia macrospiculata (Gohar 1940). I. Annual dynamics on gonadal development. Biol Bull 166:32–43
Benayahu Y, Loya Y (1986) Sexual reproduction of a soft coral: synchronous and brief annual spawning of Sarcophyton glaucum (Quoy and Gaimard, 1883). Biol Bull 70:32–42
Benayahu Y, Weil D, Kleinmann M (1990) Radiation of broadcasting and brooding patterns in coral reef alcyonaceans. Adv Invertebrate Reprod 5:323–328
Brazeau DA, Lasker HR (1990) Sexual reproduction and external brooding by the Caribbean gorgonian Briareum asbestinum. Mar Biol 104:465–474
Brito TAS, Tyler PA, Clarke A (1997) Reproductive biology of the Antarctic octocoal Thouarella variabilis Wright and Studer 1889. In: Den Hartog JC (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international conference on coelenterate biology. National Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden, pp 63–69
Carlon DB (1999) The evolution of mating systems in tropical reef corals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:491–495
Coll JC, Tapiolas DM, Bowden BF, Webb L, Marsh H (1983) Transformation of soft coral (Coelenterata: Octocorallia) terpenes by Ovula ovum (Mollusca: Prosobranchia). Mar Biol 74:35–40
Coma R, Zabala M, Gili JM (1995) Sexual reproductive effort in the Mediterranean gorgonian Paramuricea clavata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 117:185–192
Cordes EE, Nybakken JW, VanDykhuizen G (2001) Reproduction and growth of Anthomastus ritteri (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea) from Monterey Bay, California, USA. Mar Biol 138:491–501
Dahan M, Benayahu Y (1997) Clonal propagation by the azoozanthellate soft coral Dendronephthya hemprichi. Coral Reefs 16:5–12
Dinesen ZD (1983) Patterns in the distribution of soft corals across the central Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 1:229–236
Dinesen ZD (1985) Aspects of the life history of a stolon bearing species of Efflatonuaria. Proceedings of the 5th international coral reef conference, Tahiti. 6:89–94
Fabricius KE (1995) Slow population turnover in the soft coral genera Sinularia and Sarcophyton in mid- and outer-shelf reefs of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Series 126:145–152
Fabricius KE, Alderslade P (2001) Soft corals and sea fans: a comprehensive guide to the tropical shallow water genera of the central-west Pacific, the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. Australian Institute of Marine Science
Farrant PA (1986) Gonad development and the planulae of the temperate Australian soft coral Capnella gaboensis. Mar Biol 92:381–392
Fautin DG (2002) Reproduction of Cnidaria. Can J Zool 80:1735–1754
Francis L (1976) Social organization within clones of the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Biol Bull 150:361–376
Fuchs Y, Douek J, Rinkevich B, Ben-Shlomo R (2006) Gene diversity and mode of reproduction in the brooded larvae of the coral Heteroxenia fuscescens. J Hered 97:493–498
Giese AC, Pearse JS (1974) Introduction: general principles. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–49
Glynn PW, Gassman NJ, Eakin CM, Smith DB, Guzman HM (1991) Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific Costa Rica, Panama, and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) I. Pocilloporidae. Mar Biol 109:355–368
Gohar HAF (1940) Studies on the Xeniidae of the Red Sea. Publ Mar Biol Stn Ghardaqa 2:27–118
Gori A, Linares C, Rossi S, Coma R, Gili JM (2007) Spatial variability in reproductive cycle of the gorgonians Paramuricea clavata and Eunicella singularis (Anthozoa, Octocorallia) in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol 151:1571–1584
Grigg RW (1977) Population dynamics of two gorgonian corals. Ecology 58:278–290
Gutierrez-Rodrıguez C, Lasker HR (2004) Reproductive biology, development, and planula behavior in the Caribbean gorgonian Pseudopterogorgia elisabethae. Invertebr Biol 123:54–67
Hall VR, Hughes YP (1996) Reproductive strategies of modular organisms: comparative studies of reef-building corals. Ecology 77:950–963
Harrison PL, Wallace CC (1990) Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals. In: Dubinsky Z (ed) Ecosystems of the world, 25th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp 133–207
Harrison PL, Babcock RC, Bull GD, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL (1984) Mass spawning in tropical coral reefs. Science 223:1186–1189
Hartnoll RG (1975) The annual cycle of Alcyonium digitatum. Eustarine Coastal Mar Sci 3:71–75
Harvell CD (1984) Predator-induced defense in a marine bryozoan. Science 224:1357–1359
Harvell CD, Grosberg CD (1988) The timing of sexual maturity in clonal animals. Ecology 69:1855–1864
Hayashibara T, Shimoike K, Kimura T, Hosoya S, Heyward A, Harrison P, Kudo K, Omori M (1993) Patterns of coral spawning at Akajima Island, Okinawa, Japan. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 101:253–262
Hwang SJ, Song JI (2007) Reproductive biology and larval development of the temperate soft coral Dendronephthya gigantea (Alcyonacea: Nephtheidae). Mar Biol 152:273–284
Kahng SE, Benayahu Y, Wagner D, Rothe N (2008) Sexual reproduction in the invasive octocoral Carijoa riisei in Hawaii. B Mar Sci 82:1–17
Kruger A, Schleyer MH, Benayahu Y (1998) Reproduction in Anthelia glauca (Octocorallia: Xeniidae). I. Gametogenesis and larval brooding. Mar Biol 131:423–432
Lasker HR, Brazeau DA, Calderon J, Coffroth MA, Coma R, Kim K (1996) In situ rates of fertilization among broadcast spawning gorgonian corals. Biol Bull 190:45–55
Levitan DR (1996) Effects of gamete traits on fertilization in the sea and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Nature 382:153–155
McFadden CS, Donahue R, Hadland BK, Weston R (2001) A molecular phylogenetic analysis of reproductive trait evolution in the soft coral genus Alcyonium. Evolution 55:54–67
Penland L, Kloulechad J, Idip D, van Woesik R (2004) Coral spawning in the western Pacific Ocean is related to solar insolation: evidence of multiple spawning events in Palau. Coral Reefs 23:133–140
Ribes M, Coma R, Rossi S, Micheli M (2007) The cycle of gonadal development of Eunicella singularis (Cnidaria : Octocorallia): trends on sexual reproduction in Mediterranean gorgonians. Invertebr Biol 126:307–317
Richmond RH, Hunter CL (1990) Reproduction and recruitment of corals: comparisons among the Caribbean, the Tropical Pacific, and the Red Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 60:185–203
Rosser NL, Gilmour JP (2008) New insights into patterns of coral spawning on Western Australian reefs. Coral Reefs 27:345–349
Santangelo G, Carletti E, Maggi E, Bramanti L (2003) Reproduction and population sexual structure of the overexploited Mediterranean red coral Corallium rubrum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 248:99–108
Schleyer MH, Kruger A, Benayahu Y (2004) Reproduction and the unusual condition of hermaphroditism in Sarcophyton glaucum (Octocorallia, Alcyoniidae) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Hydrobiologia 530(531):399–409
Slattery M, Hines GA, Starmer J, Paul VJ (1999) Chemical signals in gametogenesis, spawning, and larval settlement and defense of the soft coral Sinularia polydactyla. Coral Reefs 18:75–84
Slattery M, Starmer J, Paul VJ (2001) Temporal and spatial variation in defensive metabolites of the tropical Pacific soft corals Sinularia maxima and S. polydactyla. Mar Biol 138:1183–1193
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford England
Tarrant AM (2005) Endocrine-like signaling in cnidarians: Current understanding and implications for ecophysiology. Integr Comp Biol 45:201–214
Veron JEN (1993) Corals of Australia and the Indo-Pacific. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu
Winsor L (1984) (Compilation) Manual of basic zoological microtechniques for light microscopy. School Biol Sci, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Australia
Yamazato K, Sato M, Yamashiro H (1981) Reproductive biology of an alcyonacean coral, Lobophytum crassum Marenzeller. Proceedings of the fourth international coral reef symposium 2:671–678
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the staff at Lizard Island Research Station for a friendly working atmosphere and for collecting monthly tissue samples during the absence of MH from the station. L. Winsor at James Cook University gave invaluable histological advice, P. Muir assisted in the laboratory. P. Alderslade (Northern Territory Museum, Darwin) confirmed the identification of the Sarcophyton elegans. M. Cuhra, M. Egerrup, H. Grossman, K. Martin-Smith, G. Smith, J.-L. Solandt and many others assisted in the field. J. Hellström assisted with the histology figures. The comments by J. Blyth, J. Spens and two anonymous reviewers improved earlier drafts of the manuscript. J. Painter edited the text. The study was supported by the Australian European Awards Program, E & G Ehrnrooth Foundation, Finnish Academy, Oskar Öflund Foundation and Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland. The samples were collected with a permit from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. P. Grassle.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hellström, M., Kavanagh, K.D. & Benzie, J.A.H. Multiple spawning events and sexual reproduction in the octocoral Sarcophyton elegans (Cnidaria: Alcyonacea) on Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 157, 383–392 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1325-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1325-8