Abstract
Postactivation depression of synaptic actions of group I and II muscle afferents and low threshold cutaneous afferents was compared with depression of actions of group Ia afferents on α-motoneurones in cats deeply anaesthetised with pentobarbital and α-chloralose. The depression was analysed on field potentials (population EPSPs). The degree of depression was evaluated by analysing changes in the monosynaptic components of the field potentials, in areas within 0.4- to 0.6-ms-long time windows from their onset. When intervals between successive stimuli used to evoke field potentials were reduced from 10 s to 0.4 s, the potentials evoked by Ia afferents in motor nuclei were depressed as described previously. Field potentials evoked by group II afferents and cutaneous afferents in the dorsal horn were similarly depressed. In contrast, monosynaptic components of field potentials evoked in the intermediate zone, by group I or II afferents, were only marginally affected. Postactivation depression of synaptic actions of group I afferents in the intermediate zone was not enhanced when test stimuli were applied 30–40 ms after a train of four conditioning stimuli. These observations indicate that the degree of postactivation depression may differ depending on the type of afferent. In addition, if postactivation depression depends on intrinsic properties of afferent terminals, differences in the degree of depression of postsynaptic potentials evoked by the same group of afferents at different locations may indicate that properties of terminals contacting different neurones may differ.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammar, I., Slawinska, U. & Jankowska, E. A comparison of postactivation depression of synaptic actions evoked by different afferents and at different locations in the feline spinal cord. Exp Brain Res 145, 126–129 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1098-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1098-5