Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of noncoding RNA consisting of 18–25 nucleotides, play an essential role in physiological and pathological processes [1,2,3]. MiRNAs have received extensive attention by researchers because of their abnormal expression in a variety of diseases and have been regarded as valuable biomarkers that can be used in the diagnosis and treatment of some cancers [4,5,6]. In recent years, increasing studies showed that miRNAs play an important role in the intervention of some viral infectious diseases (such as HIV/AIDS, West Nile disease, Ebola virus disease, etc.) [7, 8]. The miRNAs of infected cells can inhibit the replication and spread of the virus and achieve the purpose of antiviral therapy. Given that miRNAs are prone to be degraded, have low abundance in samples, and have high sequence similarity among family members, it is necessary to develop simple but sensitive methods for miRNAs detection.

The electrochemical detection technique has received increasing attention owing to its intrinsic characteristics of low cost, fast response, high sensitivity, and simple operation [9]. Many electrochemical biosensors for miRNAs detection have been developed [10,11,12,13,14]. For example, Xu et al. developed an electrochemical biosensor that can realize simultaneous detection of two miRNAs [15]. Liu and his coworkers prepared the ultrathin Aunps-MoS2 nanoflakes on the FTO electrodes by combining atomic layer deposition, greatly increasing the detection sensitivity of the miRNA sensing platform [16]. Most of these miRNA electrochemical biosensors required the synthesis of complex materials or the immobilization of DNA probes on the electrode surface, this step is cumbersome, time-consuming, and may even greatly affect the reproducibility of the proposed biosensor [17, 18]. Furthermore, due to the steric hindrance effect of the electrode surface and the loss of conformational freedom of immobilized DNA, the hybridization efficiency of DNA probe and miRNA at the electrode/solution interface is relatively low [19]. Homogeneous electrochemical detection as an immobilization-free strategy had been put forward based on the difference in electrostatic repulsion between DNA of different strand lengths and the negatively charged electrode surface [20, 21], which can solve the abovementioned problems well. The principle has been applied to the detection of various analytical targets, including various small molecules, metal ions, enzymes and proteins, etc. [22,23,24], which had also been applied to detect miRNAs. For example, Hou and colleagues designed a signal-off homogeneous electrochemical sensor for the detection of miRNA using a hybridization chain reaction [25]. Our group earlier reported a homogeneous electrochemical biosensor using a duplex-specific nuclease (DSN) cycle target to achieve signal amplification for miRNA detection [26]. But the sensitivity of these biosensors is not high enough for real sample detection since the signal amplification technique had been used. There is still a great challenge for developing more sensitive methods for practical miRNA quantification.

Enzyme-driven cascade signal amplification strategy cleverly utilizes the functional properties of DNA exonucleases and DNA polymerases to achieve multiple amplification of the response to the target [27, 28]. The ultra-high signal amplification efficiency can meet the needs for the detection of low-abundance targets, making it particularly suitable for the detection of biomarkers. For example, by combining Bst. DNA polymerase, Nt. BstNBI, ribonuclease H, and other enzymes, Wang et al. developed a fluorescence strategy that can detect uracil-DNA glycosylase at the single-cell level [29]. Xiong and coworkers also designed a label-free electrochemical sensor with exonuclease III–assisted cascade signal amplification, and the detection limit of this method for its target DNA can be as low as femtomolar [30].

In this study, coupled with the convenience of the homogeneous strategy of DNA-based electrochemical detection and high amplification efficiency of enzyme-driven cascaded signal amplification, a homogeneous electrochemical biosensor for miRNA detection (miRNA-155 has been chosen as a model target, which is a common disease marker) had been proposed. The biosensor shows excellent anti-interference in the detection of complex samples and has been successfully applied to the detection of miRNA in different cell lysates with satisfactory results.

Experimental section

Reagents

Klenow fragment polymerase (3′ → 5′ exo, KF polymerase), T7 exonuclease (T7 exo), 10× NEBuffer 4, and dNTPs were bought from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). RNase inhibitor was obtained from Bio Basic Inc. (Markham Ontario, Canada). DSN and 10× DSN master buffer were bought from Evrogen (Moscow, Russia). HEK-293 cells, HeLa cells, MCF-7 cells, miRNA and HPLC-purified DNA oligonucleotides used in this work were provided by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and the relevant sequences (5′ → 3′) are shown below:

cDNA probe: AGATTCGAACACTGCCATGACCCCTATCACGATTAGCATTAA

MB-HP: MB-ATCCTCACTGCAGACTCCATGGCAGTGTTCGCTGA

None-labeled HP: ATCCTCACTGCAGACTCCATGGCAGTGTTCGCTGA

miRNA-155: UUAAUGCUAAUCGUGAUAGGGGU

SM: UUAAGGCUAAUCGUGAUAGGGGU

SM-3′: UUAAGGCUAAUCGUGAUAGGGGA

SM-m: UUAAGGCUAAUGGUGAUAGGGGU

TM: UUAAGGCUAAUAGUGAUAUGGGU

miRNA-21: UAGCUUAUCAGACUGAUGUUGA

miRNA-141: UAACACUGUCUGGUAAAGAUGG

let-7a: UGAGGUAGUAGGUUGUAUAGUU

NC: UUGUACCUACACAAAAGUACUG

Electrochemical detection system

A CHI660A electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instruments, Shanghai, China) was used for differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) measurements. The three-electrode electrochemical system used in the experiment consisted of an ITO electrode (the working area was 5 mm × 3 mm) as the working electrode, an Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire as the counter electrode. The purchased ITO electrodes need to be ultrasonic sequentially in 10 g/L alconox solution, isopropanol, and ultrapure water for 15 min respectively to obtain a clean surface negatively charged ITO electrode. The DPV signals in the range of 0 ~ − 0.6 V were recorded under the electrochemical measurement parameters with an amplitude of 50 mV, quiet time of 2 s, pulse period of 20 ms, and pulse width of 50 ms.

Procedures for miRNA detection

First, 0.5 μM cDNA probe, different concentrations of miRNA, 0.1 U DSN, and 10 U RNase inhibitor were added into 1× DSN master buffer and incubated at 55 °C for 1 h. Second, the DSN enzyme was inactivated by adding 5 mM EDTA into the above mixture and incubating at 55 °C for 5 min. After that, 1.5 μM methylene blue-labeled hairpin DNA (MB-HP), 5 U KF polymerase, 4 mM dNTPs, 10 U T7 exo and 2 μL 10× NEBuffer 4 were added. The final total volume of the reaction system was 50 μL and incubated at 37 °C for 1.5 h. Finally, the electrochemical detection of the system was carried out and the DPV signal was recorded after the above reaction. Each sample was tested three times, and the average value of the three measurements was used for quantitative analysis.

Gel electrophoresis

The hybridization of the cDNA probe and the miRNA and DSN digestion process were explored by 12% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The working voltage was set to 80 V, and the electrophoresis was performed in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA running buffer (pH 8.4) for 2 h. The obtained gel was imaged by a gel image system (JS-2012, Peiqing Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

Results and discussion

Principle of the homogeneous electrochemical biosensor for miRNA detection

The principle of the proposed enzyme-assisted cascaded signal amplification homogeneous electrochemical miRNA biosensor is shown in Scheme 1. When the target miRNA is present, the miRNA hybridizes with a portion of the cDNA probe to form a DNA-RNA duplex. The duplex can be recognized and digested by DSN, thereby releasing miRNA and the remaining DNA fragments (released DNA). Meanwhile, the released target miRNA can combine another cDNA probe and repeat the cyclic cleavage reaction, leading to produce a great deal of released DNA (cycle I). Subsequently, the released DNA can be used to open up methylene blue–labeled hairpin DNA (MB-HP). The polymerization could be initiated by polymerase, resulting in an extended double-strand DNA with blunt 5′ terminus, which was then recognized and digested by T7 exo, generating short MB-labeled mononucleotide fragments (MB-MFs). In addition, a new single-strand DNA extended by KF polymerase (extended DNA) was released and can be used to open another MB-HP probe and generated a double-strand DNA with a 5′ blunt end, which was also recognized and digested by T7 exo (cycle II). The process produced a large amount of MB-MFs, which can easily diffuse to the negatively charged ITO electrode surface due to their low negative charge, so that an obvious DPV signal can be obtained. But in the absence of the target, nearly no released DNA had been obtained, so the MB-HP had not been opened and which cannot be digested by T7 exo. The hairpin-structured MB-HP and the duplex formed by hybridization with the cDNA probe both have strong electrostatic repulsion against the negatively charged ITO electrode (since the backbones of DNA contains negative charges) and are not easy to diffuse to the electrode surface, so only a weak signal can be detected. The electrochemical signal strength enhanced by adding target miRNA is related to the concentration of miRNA in the system. By this means, a simple, ultrasensitive, and specific homogeneous electrochemical miRNA biosensor can be developed.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Illustration of homogeneous electrochemical miRNA biosensor based on enzyme-driven cascade signal amplification strategy

Feasibility study

A gel electrophoresis experiment was employed firstly to verify the process of hybridization and DSN digestion. As shown in Fig. 1a, when only a cDNA probe was present, a short and bright band (lane a) was observed. After the addition of the target miRNA, a new band with a larger molecular weight was detected (lane b), indicating that the cDNA probe hybridized with miRNA to obtain a DNA-RNA duplex. Further addition of DSN results in the disappearance of the DNA-RNA duplex band. Since the 19-base released DNA and the 23-base miRNA were greatly overlapped on the band, only a short and shallow new band can be observed (lane c), indicating the DSN digestion reaction occurred.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A PAGE analysis of DSN enzyme–driven target cycle. Lane M: DNA marker; lane a: 1.0 μM cDNA probe; lane b: 1.0 μM cDNA probe + 0.5 μM miRNA; Lane c: 1.0 μM cDNA probe + 0.5 μM miRNA + 0.1 U DSN. B DPV responses under different conditions. (a) with cDNA probe, DSN, MB-HP, KF polymerase, dNTPs, and T7 exo; (b) with 1.0 pM miRNA, cDNA probe, DSN, MB-HP, KF polymerase, dNTPs, and T7 exo

Next, electrochemical detection had been applied to verify the feasibility of the proposed strategy. As displayed in Fig. 1b, when the target miRNA was not present, the DPV signal detected was quite weak (curve a). But in the presence of miRNA, DPV signal was significantly enhanced (curve b). That because the hybridization of miRNA with cDNA probe to form a RNA-DNA duplex, which can be cleaved by DSN, and the product released DNA can be used to open MB-HP, thereby eliciting KF polymerase extension reaction and the subsequent process of T7 exo cycling digestion, achieving signal amplification. All these results verify the feasibility of the assumption.

Optimization of the experimental conditions

The reaction conditions, such as the concentration of MB-HP, the dosage of KF polymerase and T7 exo, and the reaction time, play a critical role in the performance of the biosensor. These conditions had been optimized to obtain the best sensing performance. The experimental signal originates from methylene blue in the system. Excessive MB-HP will cause a high background signal, while insufficient MB-HP will affect the sensitivity of the system. So, the concentration of MB-HP was optimized firstly. The effect of the concentration of MB-HP (0.5 to 2.0 μM) on the DPV signal of the system was investigated when the concentration of miRNA was 1.0 pM. Figure 2a demonstrates that the DPV signals of the system increased as the MB-HP concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 μM, and tend to be stable when the MB-HP concentration exceeds 1.5 μM. When the MB-HP concentration is lower than 1.5uM, the background signal hardly increased as MB-HP increased. However, when the MB-HP concentration exceeds 1.5 μM, the background signal increased greatly. Thus, 1.5 μM MB-HP was consequently used for the subsequent studies.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of different experimental conditions on the performance of the system. a The concentration of MB-HP, b dosage of KF polymerase, c dosage, and d reaction time of T7 exo. The concentration of miRNA was 1.0 pM

The employed dosages of KF polymerase and T7 exo were also optimized. Figure 2b shows that the ΔI (the difference in the DPV peak current in the presence and absence of target) gradually increased with the dosage of KF polymerase elevated from 0 to 5.0 U firstly and ΔI almost unchanged if the dosage of KF polymerase was higher than 5 U. Therefore, 5 U was chosen as the optimal dosage of KF polymerase. As shown in Fig. 2c, the ΔI increased with the enhancing of the dosage of T7 exo from 0 to 10 U and then reached a plateau, so T7 exo of 10 U was chosen for the following experiments. Moreover, the reaction time of T7 exo had also been optimized, as shown in Fig. 2d; ΔI increased with the prolonged reaction time firstly and reached the platform at 90 min, indicating that 90 min was sufficient for the cleavage of T7 exo.

Performance of the proposed biosensor

Figure 3a shows that as the miRNA concentration increased, the DPV signal increased. The value of ΔI and the logarithm of miRNA concentration in the range of 10 fM to 10 nM exhibit a good linear relationship (shown in Fig. 3b). The linear regression equation is ΔI (μA) = − 0.2050 − 0.0835 lgCmiRNA, (R2 = 0.9952). The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 3.0 fM (S/N = 3), which is comparable to or better than the reported methods for miRNA detection (Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a DPV responses in the presence of miRNA with different concentrations (0–10 nM). b Relationship between the enhancement of DPV peak current and miRNA concentration. Inset: Linear relationship of the enhanced DPV signal and logCmiRNA

Table 1 Comparison of the proposed biosensor with other methods for miRNA detection

MiRNA-141, miRNA-21, let-7a, single-base mismatched (SM), single-base mismatched in middle (SM-m), single-base mismatched in 3′-end (SM-3′) three-base mismatched (TM), and non-complementary (NC) were selected as interferences to explore the selectivity of the proposed biosensor for miRNA detection. Especially deserving to be mentioned, the concentrations of interferences are 100-fold higher than the target miRNA (1.0 pM). As illustrated in Fig. 4, a remarkable electrochemical signal had been observed when the target was added, while when the reaction system was incubated with these interfering substances, no obvious electrochemical signal enhancement was obtained compared with the background signal. Considering the above results, it can be concluded that this biosensor possesses high selectivity toward miRNA detection. In addition, five replicate experiments were conducted in the presence of 10 pM target miRNA, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 3.5%. The good repeatability also proves the reliability of the proposed sensing strategy for miRNA detection.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Selectivity of the proposed electrochemical biosensor by compared with some typical interferences (including SM, SM-m, SM-3′, TM, non-complementary NC, miRNA-21, miRNA-141 and let-7a. The concentration of miRNA-155 was 1.0 pM and the concentration of other interferences was 100 pM

Real sample analysis

In view of the high sensitivity and good selectivity, the proposed homogeneous electrochemical biosensor has been applied to detect miRNA-155 in biological samples. The target in 10-fold diluted cell lysates of HEK-293 cell, HeLa cell, and MCF-7 cell were detected and the standard addition recoveries were tested to verify the validity of the proposed method. The results were shown in Table 2, the recovery rates of 94.0–108.2% were obtained when spiked with miRNA in the linear range, which indicated that the interference of cell lysates could be overcome, and the RSDs were in the range of 2.1–4.3%. Therefore, the proposed strategy is effective and reliable for miRNA detection and it is expected to realize the detection of miRNA in real biological samples.

Table 2 Results of the recovery test of miRNA in 10% (v/v) cell lysate (n = 3)

Conclusion

A novel homogeneous electrochemical biosensor for miRNA determination based on the cascade signal amplification strategy had been developed, owing to the excellent ability of enzyme-powered cascaded signal amplification strategy and simple homogeneous electrochemical detection. This method successfully realized the simple and ultrasensitive homogeneous electrochemical quantitative detection of miRNA. The proposed method avoids the tedious procedure of probe immobilization. Furthermore, high sensitivity had been reached because of the cascaded signal amplification strategy. The proposed biosensor shows an excellent ability to measure miRNA in cell lysates and is expected to be applied in the field of disease diagnosis and biomedical research.