Abstract
In the literature, the outcome of contests is either interpreted as win probabilities or as shares of the prize. With this in mind, we examine two approaches to contest success functions (CSFs). In the first, we analyze the implications of contestants’ incomplete information concerning the ‘type’ of the contest administrator. While in the case of two contestants this approach can rationalize prominent CSFs, we show that it runs into difficulties when there are more agents. Our second approach interprets CSFs as sharing rules and establishes a connection to bargaining and claims problems which is independent of the number of contestants. Both approaches provide foundations for popular CSFs and guidelines for the definition of new ones.
“The strategic approach also seeks to combine axiomatic cooperative solutions and non-cooperative solutions. Roger Myerson recently named this task the ‘Nash program’.”(Rubinstein 1985, p. 1151)
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alcalde J., Dahm M.: Tullock and Hirshleifer: a meeting of the minds. Rev Econ Des 11, 101–124 (2007)
Anbarci N., Skaperdas S., Syropoulos C.: Comparing bargaining solutions in the shadow of conflict: how norms against threats can have real effects. J Econ Theory 106, 1–16 (2002)
Baik K.H.: Difference-form contest success functions and effort levels in contests. Eur J Polit Econ 14, 685–701 (1998)
Baye M.R., Hoppe H.C.: The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games. Games Econ Behav 44, 217–226 (2003)
Bossert W.: An alternative solution to bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 25, 205–220 (1993)
Che Y.-K., Gale I.: Difference-form contests and the robustness of all-pay auctions. Games Econ Behav 30, 22–43 (2000)
Chun Y., Thomson W.: Bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 24, 19–33 (1992)
Clark D., Riis C.: Contest success functions: an extension. Econ Theory 11, 201–204 (1998)
Corchón L.: The allocative effects of rent-seeking. J Public Econ Theory 2(4), 483–491 (2002)
Dagan N., Serrano R., Volij O.: A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules. Games Econ Behav 18, 55–72 (1997)
Dagan N., Volij O.: The bankruptcy problem: a cooperative bargaining approach. Math Soc Sci 26, 287–297 (1993)
Dixit A.K.: Strategic behavior in contests. Am Econ Rev 77(5), 891–898 (1987)
Epstein G.S., Nitzan S.: The politics of randomness. Soc Choice Welf 27, 423–433 (2006)
Esteban, J., Sákovics, J.: A theory of agreements in the shadow of conflict (2006, unpublished manuscript)
Fullerton R.L., McAfee R.P.: Auctioning entry into tournaments. J Polit Econ 107, 573–605 (1999)
Garfinkel, M. R., Skaperdas, S.: Economics of conflict: an overview. In: Sandler, T., Hartley, K. (eds.) Handbook of Defense Economics, vol. 2, Chap. 22, pp. 649–709. Amsterdam: North Holland (2007)
Gradstein M.: Optimal contest design: volume and timing of rent seeking in contests. Eur J Polit Econ 14(4), 575–585 (1998)
Gradstein M.: Intensity of competition, entry and entry deterrence in rent-seeking contests. Econ Polit 7, 79–91 (1995)
Hillman A.L., Riley J.G.: Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Polit 1(1), 17–39 (1989)
Hirshleifer J.: Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: ratio vs. difference models of relative success. Public Choice 63, 101–112 (1989)
Hirshleifer J., Riley J.: The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)
Hotelling H.: Stability in competition. Econ J 39, 41–57 (1929)
Jia H.: A stochastic derivation of contest success functions. Public Choice 135(3–4), 125–130 (2008). doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9242-1
Konrad, K.A.: Strategy in contests—an introduction, WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2007–01 (2007)
Lazear E.P., Rosen S.: Rank-order tournaments and optimum labor contracts. J Polit Econ 89(5), 841–864 (1989)
McFadden D..: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P.(eds) Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic Press, New York (1974)
Nitzan S.: Modelling rent-seeking contests. Eur J Polit Econ 10, 41–60 (1994)
Rubinstein A.: A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences. Econometrica 53(5), 1151–1172 (1985)
Salop S.C.: Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J Econ 10, 141–156 (1979)
Skaperdas S.: Contest success functions. Econ Theory 7, 283–290 (1996)
Szidarovszky F., Okuguchi K.: On the existence and uniqueness of pure Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games. Games Econ Behav 18, 135–140 (1997)
Tullock, G.: Efficient rent seeking. In: Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., Tullock, G. (eds.) Toward a theory of the rentseeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97–112 (1980)
Wärneryd K.: Distributional conflict and jurisdictional organization. J Public Econ 69, 435–450 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work has been partially carried out while Dahm was visiting Northwestern University (Kellogg School of Management, MEDS, CMS-EMS). The hospitality of this institution and the financial support of the Spanish Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Universidades with cofunding by the European Social Fund is gratefully acknowledged. The first author acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, project SEJ2005-06167/ECON, and the second author acknowledges the financial support by the Barcelona GSE Research Network, the Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació (Generalitat de Catalunya), project 2005SGR00949, and by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, project SEJ2007-67580-C02-01.
This paper is the melting of two independent projects. We are grateful for important input from Nicolás Porteiro and regret his decision not to coauthor the more extensive analysis of the present paper. We also wish to thank J. Atsu Amegashie, Miguel A. Ballester, Carmen Beviá, Steven Callander, Caterina Calsamiglia, Juan A. Crespo, Francesco De Sinopoli, Bard Harstad, Sjaak Hurkens, Carolina Manzano, Carlos Maravall, Antonio Quesada, Bernd Theilen, William Thomson and Cori Vilella for helpful comments. The suggestions by the editor C. D. Aliprantis and an anonymous referee substantially improved the analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corchón, L., Dahm, M. Foundations for contest success functions. Econ Theory 43, 81–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0425-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0425-x