Abstract
New Zealand uses 13 separate local vertical datums (LVDs) based on geodetic levelling from 12 different tide-gauges. We describe their unification using a regional gravimetric quasigeoid model and GPS-levelling data on each LVD. A novel application of iterative quasigeoid computation is used, where the LVD offsets computed from earlier models are used to apply additional gravity reductions from each LVD to that model. The solution converges after only three iterations yielding LVD offsets ranging from 0.24 to 0.58 m with an average standard deviation of ±0.08 m. The so-computed LVD offsets agree, within expected data errors, with geodetically levelled height differences at common benchmarks between adjacent LVDs. This shows that iterated quasigeoid models have a role in vertical datum unification.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amos MJ (2007) Quasigeoid modelling in New Zealand to unify multiple local vertical datums. PhD Thesis, Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth
Amos MJ, Featherstone WE (2003) Preparations for a new gravimetric geoid model of New Zealand, and some preliminary results. NZ Surv 293: 3–14
Amos MJ, Featherstone WE (2004) A comparison of gridding techniques for terrestrial gravity observations in New Zealand. Poster presented to the Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions Symposium 2004, Oporto, Portugal, 30 August–1 September. http://www.fc.up.pt/ggsm2004/index.html
Amos MJ, Featherstone WE, Brett J (2005) Crossover adjustment of New Zealand marine gravity data, and comparisons with satellite altimetry and global geopotential models. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes J (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions. Springer, Berlin, pp 266–271
Andersen OB, Knudsen P (2000) The role of satellite altimetry in gravity field modelling in coastal areas. Phys Chem Earth 25(1): 17–24. doi:10.1016/S1464-1895(00)00004-1)00004-1
Andersen OB, Knudsen P, Trimmer R (2005) Improved high resolution altimetric gravity field mapping (KMS2002 global marine gravity field). In: Sansò F (eds) A window on the future of geodesy. Springer, Berlin, pp 326–331
Arabelos D, Tscherning CC (2001) Improvements in height datum transfer expected from the GOCE mission. J Geod 75(5–6): 308–312. doi:10.1007/s001900100187
Beanland S, Blick GH, Darby DJ (1990) Normal faulting in a back-arc basin: geological and geodetic characteristics of the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake, New Zealand. J Geophys Res 95(B4): 4693–4707
Beavan RJ, Matheson DW, Denys P, Denham M, Herring T, Hager B, Molnar P (2004) A vertical deformation profile across the Southern Alps, New Zealand, from 3.5 years of continuous GPS data. In: van Dam T, Francis O (eds) Proceedings of the Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie workshop: The State of GPS Vertical Positioning Precision: Separation of Earth Processes by Space Geodesy, Luxembourg, vol 23, pp 111–123
Begg JG, McSaveney MJ (2005) Wairarapa fault rupture—vertical deformation in 1855 and a history of similar events from Turakirae Head. In: Langridge R, Townend J, Jones A (eds) The 1855 Wairarapa Earthquake Symposium Proceedings, Greater Wellington Regional Council. Wellington, New Zealand, pp 21–30
Bell RG, Goring DG, de Lange WP (2000) Sea-level change and storm surges in the context of climate change. IPENZ Trans 27(1): 1–10
Bevin AJ, Otway PM, Wood PR (1984) Geodetic monitoring of crustal deformation in New Zealand. In: Walcott RI (eds) An Introduction to the recent crustal movements of New Zealand, Royal Society Miscellaneous Series 7, Royal Society of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand, pp 13–60
Blick GH, Mole D, Pearse MB, Wallen B (1997) Land information New Zealand role in and needs for sea level data. Immediate Report 97/17, Land Information New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. Available from: http://www.linz.govt.nz/surveypublications
Boucher C, Altamimi Z, Sillard P (1998) Results and analysis of the ITRF96. IERS Technical Note 24, Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France
Brett J (2004) Marine gravity crossover adjustment for New Zealand. Report to Land Information New Zealand, Intrepid Geophysics, Melbourne, Australia
Burša M, Kenyon S, Kouba J, šíma Z, Vatrt V, Vojtíšková M (2004) A global vertical reference frame based on four regional vertical datums. Stud Geophys Geod 48(3): 493–502. doi:10.1023/b:sgeg.0000037468.48585.e6
Burša M, Kenyon S, Kouba J, šíma Z, Vatrt V, Vítek V, Vojtíšková M (2007) The geopotential value W 0 for specifying the relativistic atomic time scale and a global vertical reference system. J Geod 81(2): 103–110. doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0091-3
Cross PA, Hannah J, Hradilek L, Kelm R, Mäkinen J, Merry CL, Sjöberg LE, Steeves RR, Vaníček P, Zolkoski DB (1987) Four-dimensional geodetic positioning. Manuscr Geodaet 12(3): 147–222
Deng XL, Featherstone WE (2006) A coastal retracking system for satellite radar altimeter waveforms: application to ERS-2 around Australia. J Geophys Res 111: C06012. doi:10.1029/2005JC003039
DoSLI (1989) Geodetic survey branch manual of instruction. Department of Survey and Land Information, Wellington, New Zealand
Ellmann A (2005) Two deterministic and three stochastic modifications of Stokes’s formula: a case study for the Baltic countries. J Geod 79(1): 11–23. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0438-1
Featherstone WE (2000) Towards the unification of the Australian height datum between mainland and Tasmania using GPS and AUSGeoid98. Geom Res Aust 73: 33–54
Featherstone WE, Kirby JF (2000) The reduction of aliasing in gravity anomalies and geoid heights using digital terrain data. Geophys J Int 141(1): 204–212. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00082.x
Featherstone WE, Sideris MG (1998) Modified kernels in spectral geoid determination: first results from Western Australia. In: Forsberg R, Feissl M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the Move. Springer, Berlin, pp 188–193
Featherstone WE, Kuhn M (2006) Height systems and vertical datums: a review in the Australian context. J Spatial Sci 51(1): 21–42
Featherstone WE, Evans JD, Olliver JG (1998) A Meissl-modified Vaníček and Kleusberg kernel to reduce the truncation error in gravimetric geoid computations. J Geod 72(3): 154–160. doi:10.1007/s001900050157
Featherstone WE, Kirby JF, Kearsley AHW, Gilliland JR, Johnston GM, Steed J, Forsberg R, Sideris MG (2001) The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data. J Geod 75(5–6): 313–330. doi:10.1007/s001900100177
Featherstone WE, Holmes SA, Kirby JF, Kuhn M (2004) Comparison of Remove-Compute-Restore and University of New Brunswick techniques to geoid determination over Australia, and inclusion of Wiener-type filters in reference field contribution. J Surv Eng 130(1): 40–47. doi:10.1061/(ACSE)0733-9453)(2004)130:1(40)
Gilliland JR (1987) A review of the levelling networks of New Zealand. NZ Surv 271: 7–15
Goldan H-J, Seeber G (1994) Precise tide gauge connection to the island of Helgoland. Mar Geod 17(2): 147–152
Grafarend EW, Ardalan AA (1997) W0: an estimate of the Finnish Height Datum N60, epoch 1993.4 from twenty-five GPS points of the Baltic sea level project. J Geod 71(11): 673–679. doi:10.1007/s001900050134
Haagmans R, De Min E, Van Gelderen M (1993) Fast evaluation of convolution integrals on the sphere using 1D FFT, and a comparison with existing methods for Stokes’ integral. Manuscr Geodaet 18(5): 227–241
Hackney RI, Featherstone WE (2003) Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’, Geophys J Int 154(1):35–43. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01941.x [Errata in 154(2):596, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02058.x and 167(2):585–585, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03035.x].
Hannah J (1990) Analysis of mean sea level data from New Zealand for the period 1899–1988. J Geophys Res 95(B8): 12399–12405
Hannah J (2001) An assessment of New Zealand’s height systems and options for a future height datum. Report prepared for Land Information New Zealand, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Heck B (2003) Rechenverfahren und Auswertemodelle der Landesvermessung, 3rd edn. Wichman, Karlsruhe, Germany
Heck B, Grüninger W (1987) Modification of Stokes’s integral formula by combining two classical approaches. In: Proceedings of the XIX General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vancouver, Canada, vol 2, pp 309–337
Heck B, Rummel R (1990) Strategies for solving the vertical datum problem using terrestrial and satellite geodetic data. In: Sünkel H, Baker T (eds) Sea-surface topography and the geoid. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–128
Henderson J (1933) The geological aspects of the Hawkes Bay earthquakes. NZ J Sci Tech 15(1): 38–75
Hipkin RG (2000) Modelling the geoid and sea surface topography in coastal areas. Phys Chem Earth 25(1): 9–16. doi:10.1016/S1464-1895(00)00003-X
Humphries T (1908) Circular 847. Surveyor-general. Department of Lands and Survey. Wellington, New Zealand
Hunt TM, Ferry LM (1975) Gravity measurements at principal New Zealand stations. NZ J Geo Geophys 18(3): 713–720
IAG (1967) Geodetic reference system 1971. Special Publication 3 of Bulletin Géodésique, Paris, France
Janák J, Vaníček P (2005) Mean free-air gravity anomalies in the mountains. Stud Geophys Geod 49(1): 31–42. doi:10.1007/s11200-005-1624-6
Kirby JF, Forsberg R (1998) A comparison of techniques for the integration of satellite altimeter and surface gravity data for geoid determination. In: Forsberg R, Feissel M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the move. Springer, Berlin, pp 207–212
Kumar M, Burke KJ (1998) Realizing a global vertical datum with the use of the geoid. In: Vermeer M, ádám J (eds) Report 98:4, Second Continental Worksop on the Geoid, Finnish Geodetic Institute, Masala, Finland, pp 87–94
Laskowski P (1983) The effect of vertical datum inconsistencies on the determination of gravity related quantities. Report 349, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor RG, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Lensen GJ, Otway PM (1971) Earthshift and post earthshift deformation associated with the May 1968 Inangahua earthquake, New Zealand. R Soc NZ Bull 9(1): 107–167
LINZ (2007) LINZS25000 Standard for New Zealand Geodetic Datum 2000. Land Information New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
Martinec Z, Vaníček P, Mainville A, Véronneau M (1996) Evaluation of topographical effects in precise geoid computation from densely sampled heights. J Geod 70(11): 746–754. doi:10.1007/BF00867153
Meissl P (1971) Preparations for the numerical evaluation of second-order Molodensky-type formulas. Report 163, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus
Merry C, Vaníček P (1983) Investigation of local variations of sea surface topography. Mar Geod 7(2): 101–126
Morelli C, Gantar C, Honkaslo T, McConnell RK, Tanner TG, Szabo B, Uotila U, Whalen CT (1974) The International Gravity Standardisation Network 1971 (IGSN71). Special Publication 4 of Bulletin Géodésique, International Association of Geodesy, Paris, France
Moritz H (1968) On the use of the terrain correction in solving Molodensky’s problem. Report 108, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus
Moritz H (1980) Geodetic Reference System 1980. B Geod 54(3): 395–405. doi:10.1007/BF02521480
Nagy D (1966) The prism method for terrain corrections using digital computers. Pure Appl Geophys 63(1): 31–39. doi:10.1007/BF00875156
Nagy D (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right angular prism. Geophysics 31(2): 362–371. doi:10.1190/1.1439779
Nahavandchi H, Sjöberg LE (1998) Unification of vertical datums by GPS and gravimetric geoid models using modified Stokes formula. Mar Geod 21(4): 261–273
OSG (2003) Accuracy standards for geodetic surveys. SG Standard 1, Office of the Surveyor-General, Land Information New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. Available from http://www.linz.govt.nz/surveypublications
Otway PM, Blick GH, Scott BJ (2002) Vertical deformation at Lake Taupo, New Zealand, from lake levelling surveys. NZ J Geol Geophys 45(1): 121–132
Pan M, Sjöberg L (1998) Unification of vertical datums by GPS and gravimetric geoid models with application to Fennoscandia. J Geod 72(2): 64–70. doi:10.1007/s001900050149
Pugh D (2004) Changing sea levels: effects of tides, weather and climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rapp RH (1961) The orthometric height. MS Thesis, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Rapp RH (1995) A world vertical datum proposal. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten 102(8–9): 297–304
Rapp RH, Balasubramania N (1992) A conceptual formulation of a world height system. Report 421, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Reilly WI (1972) New Zealand gravity map series. NZ J Geol Geophys 15(1): 3–15
Rizos C, Coleman R, Ananga N (1991) The Bass Strait GPS survey: preliminary results of an experiment to connect Australian height datums. Aust J Photogram Surv 55: 1–25
Rummel R, Teunissen PJG (1988) Height datum definition, height datum correction and the role of the geodetic boundary value problem. B Geod 62(4): 477–498. doi:10.1007/BF02520239
Strykowski G, Forsberg R (1998) Operational merging of satellite airborne and surface gravity data by draping techniques. In: Forsberg R, Feissl M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the move. Springer, Berlin, pp 207–212
Tapley BD, Ries J, Bettadpur S, Chambers D, Cheng M, Condi F, Gunter B, Kang Z, Nagel P, Pastor R, Poole S, Wang F (2005) GGM02—an improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. J Geod 79(8): 467–478. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0480-z
Tscherning CC, Forsberg R, Knudsen P (1992) The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination. In: Holota P, Vermeer M (eds) Proceedings of the 1st Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, May 11–14, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 327–334
Vaníček P, Featherstone WE (1998) Performance of three types of Stokes’s kernel in the combined solution of the geoid. J Geod 72(12): 684–697. doi:10.1007/s001900050209
Vaníček P, Kleusberg A (1987) The Canadian geoid—Stokesian approach. Manuscr Geod 12(2): 86–98
Walcott RI (1984) The kinematics of the Plate Boundary Zone through New Zealand: a comparison of short- and long-term deformations. Geophys J R Astr Soc 79(2): 613–633
Wellman HW (1979) An uplift map for the South Island of New Zealand, and a model for uplift of the Southern Alps. In: Walcott RI, Cresswell MM (eds) The Origin of the Southern Alps, Bulletin 18, Royal Society of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand
Wessel P, Watts AB (1988) On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements. J Geophys Res 94(B4): 7685–7729
Wong L, Gore R (1969) Accuracy of geoid heights from modified Stokes kernels. Geophys J R Astr Soc 18: 81–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amos, M.J., Featherstone, W.E. Unification of New Zealand’s local vertical datums: iterative gravimetric quasigeoid computations. J Geod 83, 57–68 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0232-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0232-y