Abstract
Following our earlier definition of the rigorous orthometric height [J Geod 79(1-3):82–92 (2005)] we present the derivation and calculation of the differences between this and the Helmert orthometric height, which is embedded in the vertical datums used in numerous countries. By way of comparison, we also consider Mader and Niethammer’s refinements to the Helmert orthometric height. For a profile across the Canadian Rocky Mountains (maximum height of ~2,800 m), the rigorous correction to Helmert’s height reaches ~13 cm, whereas the Mader and Niethammer corrections only reach ~3 cm. The discrepancy is due mostly to the rigorous correction’s consideration of the geoid-generated gravity disturbance. We also point out that several of the terms derived here are the same as those used in regional gravimetric geoid models, thus simplifying their implementation. This will enable those who currently use Helmert orthometric heights to upgrade them to a more rigorous height system based on the Earth’s gravity field and one that is more compatible with a regional geoid model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allister NA, Featherstone WE (2001) Estimation of Helmert orthometric heights using digital barcode levelling, observed gravity and topographic mass–density data over part of Darling Scarp, Western Australia. Geom Res Aust 75:25–52
Bruns H (1878) Die Figur der Erde, Publ0. Preuss Geod Inst, Berlin
Dennis ML, Featherstone WE (2003) Evaluation of orthometric and related height systems using a simulated mountain gravity field. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and geoid 2002, Dept of Surv and Geodesy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp 389–394
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman, San Francisco
Helmert FR (1890) Die Schwerkraft im Hochgebirge, Insbesondere in den Tyroler Alpen, Veröff. Königl. Preuss Geod Inst No. 1, Berlin
Jekeli C (2000) Heights, the geopotential, and vertical datums, Rep 459, Dept. Geod. Sci., Ohio State University, Columbus
Kellogg OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Kingdon R, Vaníček P, Santos M, Ellmann A, Tenzer R (2005) Toward an improved orthometric height system for Canada. Geomatica 59(3):241–250 (Errata: Figure 4 on Geomatica, Vol 60 (1):101)
Mader K (1954) Die orthometrische Schwerekorrektion des Präzisions-Nivellements in den Hohen Tauern, Österreichische Zeitschrift f’ur Vermessungswesen, Sonderheft 15, Vienna
Martinec Z (1993) Effect of lateral density variations of topographical masses in view of improving geoid model accuracy over Canada. Final report of contract DSS No. 23244-2-4356, Geodetic Survey of Canada, Ottawa
Martinec Z (1998) Boundary value problems for gravimetric determination of a precise geoid. Lecture notes in Earth Sciences, 73, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Niethammer T (1932) Nivellement und Schwere als Mittel zur Berechnung wahrer Meereshöhen. Schweizerische Geodätische Kommission, Berne
Novák P, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal representation of the topographical potential and its vertical gradient. J Geod 78(1–3):691–706. DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0435-4
Sjöberg LE (2004) The effect on the geoid of lateral topographic density variations. J Geod 78(1-2):34–39
Strange WE (1982) An evaluation of orthometric height accuracy using borehole gravimetry. Bull Géod 56:300–311
Sünkel H (1986) Digital height and density model and its use for the orthometric height and gravity field determination for Austria. In: Proceedings of international symposium on the definition of the geoid, Florence, May, pp 599–604
Tenzer R, Vaníček P (2003) Correction to Helmert orthometric height due to actual lateral variation of topographical density. Braz J Cart 55(2):44–47
Tenzer R, Vaníček P, Santos M, Featherstone WE, Kuhn M (2005) Rigorous determination of the orthometric height. J Geod 79(1–3):82–92. DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0445-2
Vaníček P, Kleusberg A, Martinec Z, Sun W, Ong P, Najafi M, Vajda P, Harrie L, Tomášek P, ter Horst B (1995) Compilation of a precise regional geoid. DSS Contract# 23244-1-4405/01-SS Report for Geodetic Survey Division, Ottawa, pp 45
Vaníček P, Martinec Z (1994) Stokes–Helmert scheme for the evaluation of a precise geoid. Manuscr Geodaet 19(3):119–128
Vaníček P, Janák J, Huang JL (2001) Mean vertical gradient of gravity. In: Sideris MG (eds) Gravity, geoid and geodynamics 2000. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 259–262
Vaníček P, Novák P, Martinec Z (2001) Geoid, topography, and the Bouguer plate or shell. J Geod 75(4):210–215. DOI 10.1007/s001900100165
Vaníček P, Kleusberg A, Martinec Z, Sun W, Ong P, Najafi M, Vajda P, Harrie L, Tomášek P, ter Horst B (1995) Compilation of a precise regional geoid. Final report on research done for the Geodetic Survey Division, Fredericton
Vaníček P, Tenzer R, Sjöberg LE, Martinec Z, Featherstone WE (2004) New views of the spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly. Geophys J Int 159(2):460–472. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02435.x
Wichiencharoen C (1982) The indirect effects on the computation of geoid undulations. Report 336, Dept Geod Sci, Ohio State University, Columbus
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, M.C., Vaníček, P., Featherstone, W.E. et al. The relation between rigorous and Helmert’s definitions of orthometric heights. J Geod 80, 691–704 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0086-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0086-0