Abstract
This article challenges the common view that exports generally contribute more to GDP growth than a pure change in export volume, as the export-led growth hypothesis predicts. Applying panel cointegration techniques to a production function with non-export GDP as the dependent variable, we find for a sample of 45 developing countries that: (i) exports have a positive short-run effect on non-export GDP and vice versa (short-run bidirectional causality), (ii) the long-run effect of exports on non-export output, however, is negative on average, but (iii) there are large differences in the long-run effect of exports on non-export GDP across countries. Cross-sectional regressions indicate that these cross-country differences in the long-run effect of exports on non-export GDP are significantly negatively related to cross-country differences in primary export dependence and business and labor market regulation. In contrast, there is no significant association between the growth effect of exports and the capacity of a country to absorb new knowledge.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abu-Quarn AS, Abu-Bader S (2004) The validity of the ELG hypothesis in the MENA region: cointegration and error correction model analysis. Appl Econ 36: 1685–1695
Ahmad J, Harnhirun S (1995) Unit roots and cointegration in estimating causality between exports and economic growth: empirical evidence from the ASEAN countries. Econ Lett 49: 329–334
Al-Yousif YK (1997) Exports and economic growth: some empirical evidence from the Arab Gulf Countries. Appl Econ 29: 693–697
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Alse J (1993) Export growth and economic growth: an application of cointegration and error correction modelling. J Dev Areas 27: 535–542
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Economidou C (2009) Export-led growth vs. growth-led exports: LDCs experience. J Dev Areas 42: 179–209
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Oyolola M (2007) Export growth and output growth: an application of bounds testing approach. J Econ Finance 31: 1–11
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Mohtadi H, Shabsigh G (1991) Exports, growth and causality: a re-examination. J Dev Econ 36: 405–415
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Economidou C, Goswami GG (2005) Export-led growth hypothesis revisited: a panel cointegration approach. Sci J Admin Dev 3: 40–55
Bai J, Ng S (2002) Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica 70: 191–221
Bai J, Ng S (2004) A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72: 1127–1177
Balassa B (1978) Exports and economic growth: further evidence. J Dev Econ 5: 181–189
Banerjee A, Russell B (2005) Inflation and measures of the markup. J Macroecon 27: 289–306
Banerjee A, Marcellino M, Osbat C (2004) Some cautions on the use of panel methods for integrated series of macroeconomic data. Econom J 7: 322–340
Campbell JY, Perron P (1991) Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots. In: Blanchard OJ, Fischer S (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 141–201
Chow PCY (1987) Causality between export growth and industrial development: empirical evidence from NICs. J Dev Econ 26: 55–63
Chuang Y-C (1998) Learning by doing, the technology gap, and growth. Int Econ Rev 39: 697–721
Dawe D (1996) A new look at the effects of export instability on investment and growth. World Dev 24: 1905–1914
DeJong DN, Whiteman CH (1991) The case for trend-stationarity is stronger than we thought. J Appl Econom 6: 413–421
Dodaro S (1993) Exports and growth: a reconsideration of causality. J Dev Areas 27: 227–244
Edwards S (1988) Terms of trade, tariffs, and labor–market adjustment in developing countries. World Bank Econ Rev 2: 165–185
Edwards S (1993) Openness, trade liberalisation, and growth in developing countries. J Econ Lit 31: 1358–1393
Feder G (1983) On exports and economic growth. J Dev Econ 12: 59–73
Gengenbach C, Palm FC, Urbain J-M (2006) Cointegration testing in panels with common factors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 68: 683–719
Gengenbach C, Urbain J-P, Westerlund J (2008) Panel error correction testing with global stochastic trends. University of Maastricht. Working paper Meteor RM/08/051
Giles JA, Williams CL (2000) Export-led growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part 1. J Int Trade Econ Dev 9: 261–337
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relationships by econometric models: cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438
Granger CWJ (1988) Some recent developments in a concept of causality. J Econ 39: 199–211
Greenaway D, Sapsford D (1994) What does liberalisation do for exports and growth. Rev World Econ 130: 152–174
Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Heller P, Porter R (1978) Exports and growth: an empirical reinvestigation. J Dev Econ 5: 191–193
Helpman E, Krugman P (1985) Market structure and foreign trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Herzer D (2007) How does trade composition affect productivity? Evidence for Chile. Appl Econ Lett 14: 909–912
Herzer D (2008) The long-run relationship between outward FDI and domestic output: evidence from panel data. Econ Lett 100: 146–149
Herzer D (2010) A further examination of the export-led growth hypothesis. Discussion paper no. 200. Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research (IAI), Goettingen
Hsiao MCW (1987) Tests of causality and exogeneity between exports and economic growth: the case of Asian NICs. J Econ Dev 12: 149–159
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115: 53–74
Johansen S (1995) Likelihood based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jun S (2007) Bi-directional relationships between exports and growth: a panel cointegration analysis. J Econ Res 12: 133–171
Jung WS, Marshall PJ (1985) Exports, growth and causality in developing countries. J Dev Econ 18: 1–12
Kao C, Chiang M (2000) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Adv Econom 15: 179–222
Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2011) Panels with nonstationary multifactor error structures. J Econom 160: 326–348
Kavoussi RM (1984) Export expansion and economic growth: further empirical evidence. J Dev Econ 14: 241–250
Kunst RM, Marin D (1989) On exports and productivity: a causal analysis. Rev Econ Stat 71: 699–703
Leybourne SJ (1995) Testing for unit roots using forward and reverse Dickey–Fuller regressions. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 57: 559–571
Love J (1994) Engines of growth: the export and government sectors. World Econ 17: 203–218
Love J, Chandra R (2004) Testing export-led growth in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka using a multivariate framework. Manch Sch 72: 483–496
McNab RM, Moore RE (1998) Trade policy, export expansion, human capital and growth. J Int Trade Econ Dev 7: 237–256
Michaely M (1977) Exports and growth: an empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 4: 49–53
Parida PC, Sahoo P (2007) Export-led growth in South Asia: a panel cointegration analysis. Int Econ J 21: 155–175
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61: 653–670
Pedroni P (2000) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Adv Econom 15: 93–130
Pedroni P (2001) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat 83: 727–731
Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 20: 597–625
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74: 967–1012
Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57: 99–125
Ram R (1985) Exports and economic growth: some additional evidence. Econ Dev Cult Change 33: 415–425
Ram R (1987) Exports and economic growth in developing countries: evidence from time-series and cross-section data. Econ Dev Cult Change 36: 51–72
Reinsel GC, Ahn SK (1992) Vector autoregressive models with unit roots and reduced rank structure: estimation, likelihood ratio test and forecasting. J Time Ser Anal 13:353–375(1987)
Reppas PA, Christopoulos DK (2005) The export-output growth nexus: evidence from African and Asian countries. J Pol Model 27: 929–940
Riezman RG, Summers PM, Whiteman CH (1996) The engine of growth or its handmaiden? A time series assessment of export-led growth. Empir Econ 21: 77–113
Sachs J, Warner A (1995) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER working paper no. 5398
Salvatore D, Hatcher T (1991) Inward and outward oriented trade strategies. J Dev Stud 27: 7–25
Saxonhouse G (1976) Estimated parameters as dependent variables. Am Econ Rev 66: 178–183
Sharma SC, Dhakal D (1994) Causal analysis between exports and economic growth in developing countries. Appl Econ 26: 1145–1157
Siliverstovs B, Herzer D (2007) Manufacturing exports, mining exports, and growth: cointegration and causality analysis for Chile (1960–2001). Appl Econ 39: 153–167
Sims CA (1972) Money, income, and causality. Am Econ Rev 62: 540–552
Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher-order integrated systems. Econometrica 61: 783–820
Toda HY, Phillips PCB (1993) Vector autoregressions and causality. Econometrica 61: 1367–1393
Tyler W (1981) Growth and export expansion in developing countries: some empirical evidence. J Dev Econ 9: 121–130
Van den Berg H, Schmidt JR (1994) Foreign trade and economic growth: time series evidence from Latin America. J Int Trade Econ Dev 3: 249–268
Westerlund J, Larsson R (2009) A note on the pooling of individual PANIC unit root tests. Econom Theory 25: 1851–1868
World Bank (2008) World development indicators 2008. World Bank, Washington, DC
World Bank (2009) Doing business 2009. Comparing regulation in 181 economies. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dreger, C., Herzer, D. A further examination of the export-led growth hypothesis. Empir Econ 45, 39–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0602-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0602-4