Abstract
The production of a tubular hydroformed part often requires a combination of internal pressure and axial force at the tube ends to fully form the tube to its specified geometry. A successful hydroforming process requires not only achieving a part that conforms to the design specifications, but also ensures that the part has a reasonably uniform thickness distribution and is free of defects, such as wrinkles, severe thinning, or fractures. The load path design (pressure vs. end feed history) largely determines the robustness of the process and the quality of the finished parts. In this paper, a hybrid constrained optimization method was proposed to solve this type of multi-objective problem by coupling a multi-objective genetic algorithm and a local search. The load path design procedure was developed by considering five objectives: four formability objectives (i.e., to minimize the risk of wrinkling, global and local thinning, and fracture) and a geometric objective (to minimize the corner radius). A Kriging predictor was used to accelerate the computation of genetic operations and generate new feasible solutions. Finite element simulations of the hydroforming process were also used after each generation to accurately evaluate the objectives of the offspring, and solutions with rank 1 were retained throughout all generations. Once the Pareto solutions were obtained by multi-objective genetic algorithm, a local search was carried out in the regions of interest with the assistance of visualization. This optimization method was applied to the hydroforming of a straight tube to create a part with an expanded region with a square cross section; the optimum load path produced a very safe part with a corner radius of only 9.115 mm and a maximum thinning of only 23.9%.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Manabe K, Amino M (2002) Effects of process parameters and material properties on deformation process in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 123:285–291
Yang JB, Jeon BH, Oh SI (2001) Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of the hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 113:666–672
Fann KJ, Hsiao PY (2003) Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 140:520–524
Imaninejad M, Subhash G, Loukus A (2005) Load path optimization of tube hydroforming process. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 45:1504–1514
Lorenzo RD, Filice L, Umbrello D, Micari F (2004) Optimal design of tube hydroforming processes—a fuzzy-logic-based approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 218(6):599–606
Ray P, Donald BJM (2004) Determination of the optimal load path for tube hydroforming processes using a fuzzy load control algorithm and finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 41(2):173–192
Koç M, Allen T, Jiratheranat S, Altan T (2000) The use of FEA and design of experiments to establish design guidelines for simple hydroformed parts. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 40:2249–2266
Ingarao G, Lorenzo RD, Micari F (2009) Internal pressure and counterpunch action design in Y-shaped tube hydroforming processes—a multi-objective optimisation approach. Comput Struct 87:591–602
Bonte MHA, van den Boogaard AH, Huétink J (2008) An optimisation strategy for industrial metal forming processes, modelling, screening and solving of optimisation problems in metal forming. Struct Multidiscip Optim 35:571–586
An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2010) Multi-objective optimization and sensitivity analysis of tube hydroforming simulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(1–4):67–84. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2505-x
An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2009) A global optimization of load path design for tube hydroforming applications using MOGA, IDDRG conference, June, Golden, CO, USA, 307–318
Hughes EJ (2005) Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: many once or one many? In: 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2005), vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 222–227
Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV, Tucker K (2007) Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 196:879–893
Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology—process and product optimization using designed experiment, Wiley-Interscience
Hussain MF, Burton RR, Joshi SB (2002) Metamodeling: radial basis functions, versus polynomials. Eur J Oper Res 138:142–154
Karkoub MA, Elkholy AH, Al-Hawaj OM (2002) Modelling deformation of hydro-formed circular plates using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:871–882
Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Søndergaard J (2002) DACE—a Matlab Kriging toolbox, Version 2.0, Technical Report IMM-REP-2002-12 Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark
Goovaaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4(4):409–435
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II". IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197
Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE (2006) Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:992–1007
Wang J and Yin Z (2008), C-NSGA-II-MOPSO: an effective multi-objective optimizer for engineering design problems, Chapter 4 in Book: global design to gain a competitive edge,519-528, Springer London. doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-239-5
Favuzza S, Ippolito MG, Sanseverino ER (2006) Crowded comparison operators for constraints handling in NSGA-II for optimal design of the compensation system in electrical distribution networks. Adv Eng Informatics 20:201–211
Seshadri A (2006), multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms (MOEA), Matlab website: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/10429, by 19 Mar (Updated 27 Jan 2009), accessed on March 8, 2009
Mehnen J, Michelitsch T, Lasarczyk C, Bartz-Beielstein T (2007) Multi-objective evolutionary design of mold temperature control using DACE for parameter optimization. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 25:661–667
Hallquist JO (2007), LS-DYNA. Keyword User’s Manual, Ver. 971. LSTC
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC–Canada Research Chair 202632) and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology (OGSST) in Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
An, H., Green, D.E. & Johrendt, J. A hybrid-constrained MOGA and local search method to optimize the load path for tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60, 1017–1030 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3648-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3648-0