Abstract
It has been essential to include flexibility in manufacturing policy making since variability in demand and products are considerably increasing. However, it is important to know and to monitor the proper level and type of flexibility that is required to obtain full benefits from it. This paper analyses the effects of flexibility on flow time performance of a simulated job shop. For that purpose, several scenarios are developed under four flexibility levels with two different machine selection rule and three types of dispatching rules. Furthermore, effect of jockeying as a queuing policy on the flow time performance is also investigated through simulation modeling. Results indicated that full flexibility is a preferable state for most of the cases. However, in some cases, chain configurations perform similar results since it combines the benefits of pooling and specialization. In addition, it is observed that a queue control mechanism like jockeying is an effective way to improve performance even though it may increase complexity of controlling policy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baines TS, Harrison DK, Kay JM, Hamblin DJ (1998) A consideration of modelling techniques that can be used to evaluate manufacturing strategies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(5):369–375
Correa HL (1994) Linking flexibility, uncertainty and variability in manufacturing systems: managing un-planned change in the automotive industry. Avebury, Aldershot
Gustavsson S (1984) Flexibility and productivity in complex production processes. Int J Prod Res 22(5):801–808
Wadhwa S, Rao K, Chan F (2006) Comparative influence of three flexibility types on manufacturing lead-time performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(9):1002–1007
Chan FTS, Bhagwat R, Wadhwa S (2006) Increase in flexibility: productive or counterproductive? A study on the physical and operating characteristics of a flexible manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 44(7):1431–1445
Baykasoğlu A (2009) Quantifying machine flexibility. Int J Prod Res 47(15):4109–4123
Eilon S, Chowdhury IG (1976) Due dates in job shop scheduling. Int J Prod Res 14:223–237
Weeks JK (1979) A simulation study of predictable due-dates. Man Science 25(4):363–373
Jan Eppink D (1978) Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Range Plann 11(4):9–15
Tsubone H, Horikawa M (1999) A comparison between machine flexibility and routing flexibility. Int J Flex Manuf Sys 11(1):83–101
Buzacott JA (1982) The fundamental principles of flexibility in manufacturing systems. In: The fundamental principles of flexibility in manufacturing systems. New York: Proceedings Book, pp 13–22
Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. The FMS Magazine, April, pp 114–117
Slack N (2005) The flexibility of manufacturing systems. Int J Oper Prod Man 25(12):1190–1200
Sethi AK, Sethi SP (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. Int J Flex Manuf Sys 2(4):289–328
Chen I, Calantone R, Chung C (1992) The marketing–manufacturing interface and manufacturing flexibility. Omega 20(4):431–443
Benjaafar S, Ramakrishnan R (1996) Modelling, measurement and evaluation of sequencing flexibility in manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 34(5):1195
Taymaz E (1989) Types of flexibility in a single-machine production system. Int J Prod Res 27(11):1891
Das SK (1991) Design and measurement of flexibility in manufacturing systems. Working paper, (No. 91–06). New Jersey Institute of Technology
Gerwin D, Kolodny H (1992) Management of advanced manufacturing technology: strategy, organization, and innovation. Wiley, New York
Lau RSM (1996) Strategic flexibility: a new reality for world-class manufacturing. SAM Adv Man J (07497075) 61(2):11
Toni AD, Tonchia S (1998) Manufacturing flexibility: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 36:1587–1617
Oke A (2005) A framework for analysing manufacturing flexibility. Int J Oper Prod Man 25(10):973–996
Gupta D (1993) On measurement and valuation of manufacturing flexibility. Int J Prod Res 31(12):2947–2958
Brill PH, Mandelbaum M (1990) Measurement of adaptivity and flexibility in production systems. Eur J Oper Res 49(3):25–332
Das SK (1996) The measurement of flexibility in manufacturing systems. Int J Flex Manuf Sys 8:67–93
Georgoulias K, Papakostas N, Chryssolouris G, Stanev S, Krappe H, Ovtcharova J (2009) Evaluation of flexibility for the effective change management of manufacturing organizations. Robot CIM-Int Manuf 25(6):888–893
Narain R, Yadav R, Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2000) The strategic implications of flexibility in manufacturing systems. Int J Agile Man Sys 2(3):202–213
Wadhwa S, Rao K (2003) Flexibility and agility for enterprise synchronization: knowledge and innovation management towards flexagility. Stud Inform Control 12:111–128
Sharma O, Sushil P (2002) Issues in managing manufacturing flexibility: a review. Global J Flex Sys Man 3:11–29
Gerwin D (2005) An agenda for research on the flexibility of manufacturing processes. Int J Oper Prod Man 25(12):1171–1182
Olhager J (1993) Manufacturing flexibility and profitability. Int J Prod Econ 30–31:67–78
Bengtsson J (2001) Manufacturing flexibility and real options: a review. Int J Prod Econ 74:213–224
Das SK, Nagendra P (1993) Investigations into the impact of flexibility on manufacturing performance. Int J Prod Res 31(10):2337–2354
Benjaafar S (1995) Performance bounds for the effectiveness of pooling in multi-processing systems. Eur J Oper Res 87(2):375–388
Jordan WC, Graves SC (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Manage Sci 41(4):577–594
Stecke KE, Kim I (1989) Performance evaluation for systems of pooled machines of unequal sizes: unbalancing versus balancing. Available from: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/36155. Accessed on: 11 March 2010
Dallery Y, Stecke KE (1990) On the optimal allocation of servers and workloads in closed queueing networks. Oper Res 38(4):694–703
Calabrese JM (1992) Optimal workload allocation in open networks of multiserver queues. Manage Sci 38(12):1792–1802
Smith D, Whitt W (1981) Resources sharing for efficiency in traffic systems. Bell Syst Tech J 60:39–55
Buzacott JA (1996) Commonalities in reengineered business processes: models and issues. Manage Sci 42(5):768–782
Sheikhzadeh M, Benjaafar S, Gupta D (1998) Machine sharing in manufacturing systems: flexibility versus chaining. Int J Flex Manuf Sys 10:351–378
Graves SC, Tomlin BT (2003) Process flexibility in supply chains. Manage Sci 49(7):907–919
Hopp WJ, Tekin E, Van Oyen MP (2004) Benefits of skill chaining in serial production lines with cross-trained workers. Manage Sci 50(1):83–98
Koenigsberg E (1966) On jockeying in queues. Manage Sci 12:412–436
Disney RL, Mitchell WE (1970) A solution for queues with instantaneous jockeying and other customer selection rules. Nav Res Log 17(3):315–325
Kao E, Lin C (1990) A matrix-geometric solution of the jockeying problem. Eur J of Oper Res 44(1):67–74
Zhao Y, Grassmann WK (1990) Shortest queue model with jockeying. Nav Res Log 37:773–787
Zhao Y, Grassmann WK (1995) Queueing analysis of a jockeying model. Oper Res 43(3):520–529
Tarabia A (2008) Analysis of two queues in parallel with jockeying and restricted capacities. Appl Math Model 32(5):802–810
Chan FTS, Chan HK (2004) A comprehensive survey and future trend of simulation study on FMS scheduling. J of Intell Manuf 15(1):87–102
Subramaniam V, Lee GK, Ramesh T, Hong GS, Wong YS (2000) Machine selection rules in a dynamic job shop. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16(12):902–908
Baker KR (1984) The effects of input control in a simple scheduling model. J of Oper Manag 4(2):99–112
Gurumurthi S, Benjaafar S (2004) Modeling and analysis of flexible queueing systems. Nav Res Log 51(5):755–782
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baykasoğlu, A., Durmuşoğlu, Z.D.U. Flow time analyses of a simulated flexible job shop by considering jockeying. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58, 693–707 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3430-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3430-3