Abstract
This paper presents the results of a conceptual study and simulation experimentation aimed at understanding the impact of three important types of flexibility on the lead-time performance of a manufacturing system. The three flexibility types, viz. transformation flexibility, sequencing flexibility and product flexibility have been identified based on a new conceptual model for flexibility in manufacturing systems and supply chains. The influence of these three flexibility types has been studied using simulation models. The studies indicated that among the three, product flexibility has the greatest influence followed by transformation flexibility and the sequencing flexibility. The reasons for the inferior performance of sequencing flexibility is found to be reduction of dynamic flexibility levels as compared to its static flexibility levels and the reasons for superior performance of product flexibility is found to be the lower movement of products within the manufacturing system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carlsson B (1988) Flexibility and the theory of the firm. Int J Ind Organ 7:179–203
Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag pp 114–117
Wadhwa S, Browne J (1989) Modeling FMS with decision Petri nets. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 1:253–280
Gerwin D (1993) Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective. Manage Sci 39(4):395–410
Upton DM (1994) The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Manage Rev Winter:72–89
De Groote X (1994) The flexibility of production processes : a general framework. Manage Sci 40(7):933–945
Tincknell DJ, Radcliffe DF (1994) A generic model of manufacturing flexibility based on system control hierarchies. Int J Prod Res 34(1):19–32
Benjaafar S, Ramakrishnan R (1996) Modelling, measurement and evaluating of sequencing flexibility in manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 34:1195–1219
Beach R, Muhlemann AP, Price DHR, Paterson A, Sharp JA, (1998) A review of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 122:41–57
Parker RP, Wirth A (1999) Manufacturing flexibility : measures and relationships. Eur J Oper Res 118:429–449
Golden W, Powell P (2000) Towards a definition of flexibility: in search of the Holy Grail? Int J Manage Sci 28:373–384
Koste LL, Malhotra MK (1999) A theoretical framework for analysing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. J Oper Manage 18:75–93
Wadhwa S, Rao KS (2000) Flexibility: an emerging meta-competence for managing high technology. Int J Technol Manage 19(7–8):820–845
Newman WR, Maffei MJ (1999) Managing the jog shop: simulating the effects of flexibility, order release mechanisms and sequencing rules. Integr Manuf Syst 10(5):266–275
Tsubone H, Horikawa M (1999) Impact of various flexibility types in a hybrid fabrication/assembly production system. Int J Prod Econ 60–61:117–123
Borenstein D (2000) A directed acyclic graph representation of routing manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 127:78–93
Garavelli AC (2001) Performance analysis of a batch production system with limited flexibility. Int J Prod Econ 69:39–48
Seifert RW, Morito S (2001) Cooperative dispatching – exploiting the flexibility of an FMS by means of incremental optimization. Eur J Oper Res 129:116–133
Chan FTS (2001) The effects of routing flexibility on a flexible manufacturing system. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 14(5):431–445
Chan FTS (2003) The effects of scheduling flexibility on the performance of a flexible manufacturing system. Proc Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: J Eng Manuf 217:899–918
Rachamadugu R, Nandkeolyar U, Schriber TJ (1990) Performance of dispatching rules under perfect sequencing flexibility. Proc 1990 Winter Simulation Conference, New Orleans, LA, pp 653–658
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wadhwa, S., Rao, K. & Chan, F. Comparative influence of three flexibility types on manufacturing lead-time performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29, 1002–1007 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2603-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2603-3