Abstract
This paper presents the development of a parameter optimization system that integrates mold flow analysis, the Taguchi method, analysis of variance (ANOVA), back-propagation neural networks (BPNNs), genetic algorithms (GAs), and the Davidon–Fletcher–Powell (DFP) method to generate optimal process parameter settings for multiple-input single-output plastic injection molding. In the computer-aided engineering simulations, Moldex3D software was employed to determine the preliminary process parameter settings. For process parameter optimization, an L25 orthogonal array experiment was conducted to arrange the number of experimental runs. The injection time, velocity pressure switch position, packing pressure, and injection velocity were employed as process control parameters, with product weight as the target quality. The significant process parameters influencing the product weight and the signal to noise (S/N) ratio were determined using experimental data based on the ANOVA method. Experimental data from the Taguchi method were used to train and test the BPNNs. Then, the BPNN was combined with the DFP method and the GAs to determine the final optimal parameter settings. Three confirmation experiments were performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed system. Experimental results show that the proposed system not only avoids shortcomings inherent in the commonly used Taguchi method but also produced significant quality and cost advantages.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Tseng WJ (1998) Statistical analysis of process parameters influencing dimensional control in ceramic injection molding. Int J Mater Process Technol 79:242–250. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00019-3
Lin TR (2003) Optimization technique for face milling stainless steel with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:330–335. doi:10.1007/s001700200021
Shiou FJ, Chen CH (2003) Freeform surface finish of a plastic injection mold by using ball-burnishing process. Int J Mater Process Technol 140:248–254. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00750-7
Ghani JA, Choudhury IA, Hassan HH (2003) Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of end milling parameters. Int J Mater Process Technol 145:84–92. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00865-3
Yang YK, Shie JR, Yang RT, Chang HA (2006) Optimization of injection molding process for contour distortion of polypropylene composite components via design of experiments method. J Rein Plast Comp 25(15):1585–1599
Su CT, Chang HH (2000) Optimization of parameter design: an intelligent approach using neural network and simulated annealing. Int J Syst Sci 31(12):1543–1549. doi:10.1080/00207720050217313
Shie JR (2008) Optimization of injection molding process for contour distortions of polypropylene composite components by a radial basis neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:1091–1103
Lau HCW, Ning A, Pun KF, Chin KS (2001) Neural networks for the dimensional control of molded parts based on a reverse process model. Int J Mater Process Technol 117:89–96
Li E, Jia L, Yu J (2002) A genetic neural fuzzy system-based quality prediction model for injection process. Comput Chem Eng 26:1253–1263
Yarlagadda PKDV (2002) Development of an integrated neural network system for prediction of process parameters in metal injection moulding. Int J Mater Process Technol 130–131:315–320
Huang MC, Tai CC (2001) The effective factors in the warpage problem of an injection-molded part with a thin shell feature. Int J Mater Process Technol 110:1–9
Chen WC, Tai PH, Wang MW, Deng WJ, Chen CT (2008) A neural network-based approach for a dynamic quality predictor in plastic injection molding process. Exp Syst Appl 35(3):843–849
Ozcelik B, Erzurumlu T (2006) Comparison of the warpage optimization in the plastic injection molding using ANOVA, neural network model and genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 171:437–445
Shi F, Lou ZL, Lu JG, Zhang YQ (2003) Optimisation of plastic injection moulding process with soft computing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:656–661
Kurtaran H, Erzurumlu T (2006) Efficient warpage optimization of thin shell plastic parts using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:468–472
Chen WC, Fu GL, Tai PH, Deng WJ (2007) Process parameter optimization for MIMO plastic injection molding via soft computing. Exp Syst Appl. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.020
Yang Y, Gao F (2006) Injection molding product weight: online prediction and control based on a nonlinear principal component regression model. Polym Eng Sci 46(4):540–548
Kamal MR, Varela AE, Patterson WI (1999) Control of part weight in injection molding of amorphous thermoplastics. Polym Eng Sci 39(5):940–952
Maier HR, Dandy GC (1998) Understanding the behaviour and optimising the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study. Environ Mod Soft 13:179–191
Liao HC (2004) A data envelopment analysis method for optimizing multi-response problem with censored data in the Taguchi method. Comput Ind Eng 46:817–835
Kim YS, Yum BJ (2004) Robust design of multilayer feed forward neural networks: an experimental approach. Eng Appl Artif Intel 17:249–263
Huang CC, Tang TT (2006) Parameter optimization in melt spinning by neural networks and genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:1113–1118
Chen WC, Hsu SW (2006) A neural-network approach for an automatic LED inspection system. Exp Syst Appl 33(2):531–537
Cheng CS, Tseng CA (1995) Neural network in detecting the change of process mean value and variance. J Chinese Ind Eng 12(3):215–223
Hush DR, Horne BG (1993) Progress in supervised neural networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag 10:8–39
Arora JS (2004) Introduction to optimum design. Elsevier/Academic, London
Fletcher R, Powell MJD (1963) A rapidly convergent descent method for minimization. Comput J 6:163–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, WC., Wang, MW., Chen, CT. et al. An integrated parameter optimization system for MISO plastic injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44, 501–511 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1843-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1843-4