Abstract
This is not an overview paper. This paper is concerned with simply making an expository note on three issues that should be taken into account when making an economic justification of investments in advanced manufacturing systems. They are the product of cost information, uncertainty, and intangible benefits available from the investment, which have been widely discussed in isolation for the last 20 years. The main purpose of this paper is primarily to provide practitioners with a synopsis of leading edge research in the area of justifying investment in advanced manufacturing systems and to stimulate a desire for better understanding and application of knowledge and techniques that will enhance professional practice.
Once companies replace their existing manufacturing systems with advanced manufacturing systems, the characteristics of the manufacturing environment are greatly changed in general. Such different characteristics usually entail three problems in justifying investment in the advanced manufacturing systems: (1) Calculating an accurate product cost, (2) Dealing with uncertainty inherent therein and (3) Intangible benefits available from the investment project. Each of these problems has been greatly discussed, mostly independently, in the academic world for the last two decades. In this paper we will revisit and discuss each of them on a general, but relatively informal, level using simple examples to illustrate the main points. The paper is intended to be expository and aimed primarily to hopefully provide practitioners with a synopsis of leading edge research in the area of justifying investment in advanced manufacturing systems and to stimulate a desire for better understanding and application of knowledge and techniques that will enhance professional practice.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cooper R (1988) The rise of activity-based costing. Part one: what is an activity-based cost system? J Cost Manage Summer:45–54
Gupta M, Galloway K (2003) Activity-based costing/management and its implications for operations management. Technovation 23:131–138
Ioannou G, Sullivan WG (1999) Use of activity-based costing and economic value analysis for the justification of capital investments in automated material handling systems. Int J Prod Res 37(9):2109–2134
Narayanan VG, Sarkar RG (2002) The impact of activity-based costing on managerial decisions at Insteel Industries – a field study. J Econ Manage Strategy 11(2):257–288
Park CS, Kim GT (1995) An economic evaluation model for advanced manufacturing systems using activity-based costs. J Manuf Syst 14:439–451
Magee JF (1964) Decision tree for decision-making. HBR Jul/Aug: 126–138
Magee JF (1964) How to use decision trees in capital investment. HBR Sep/Oct:79–96
Bierman H, Rao VR (1978) Investment decisions with sampling. Fin Manage 7:19–24
Herath HSB, Park CS, Prueitt GC (1995) Monitoring projects using cash flow control charts. Eng Econ 41(1):27–52
Moore WT, Chen SN (1983) The value of perfect information in capital budgeting decisions with unknown cash flow parameters. Eng Econ 29(1):41–51
Prueitt GC, Park CS (1997) Phased capacity expansion-using continuous distributions to model prior beliefs. Eng Econ 42(2):91–110
Smidt S (1979) A bayesian analysis of project selection and of post audit evaluations. J Fin 34:675–688
Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Fin Econ November:147–176
Amram M, Kulatilaka N (1999) Real options: managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Copeland T, Antikarov V (2001) Real options: a practitioner’s guide. Texere, New York
Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kaplan RS (1986) Must CIM be justified by faith alone? HBR Mar/Apr:87–95
Johnson HT, Kaplan RS (1987) Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Cooper R, Kaplan R (1998) Cost and effect - using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Boyd LH, Cox III JF (2002) Optimal decision making using cost accounting information. Int J Prod Res 40(8):1879–1898
Degraeve Z, Roodhooft F (2000) A mathematical programming approach for procurement using activity based costing. J Bus Fin Account 27(1):69–98
Business Week (1988) The productivity paradox. 6 Jun:100–113
Smith KV, Leksan MP (1991) A manufacturing case study on activity-based costing. Cost Manage Summer:45–54
Miller LT, Park CS (2002) Decision making under uncertainty-real options to the rescue. Eng Econ 47(2):105–150
Sick G (1989) Capital Budgeting with Real Options. Monograph Series in Finance and Economic, Monograph 1989-3, New York University, Salomon Brothers Center
Yeo KT, Qiu F (2003) The value of management flexibility – a real option approach to investment evaluation. Int J Proj Manage 21:243–250
Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81:637–659
Merton RC (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J Econ Manage Sci Spring:141–183
Kumar RL (1995) An option view of investments in expansion-flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Eco 38:281–291
Margrabe W (1978) The value of an option to exchange one asset for another. J Fin 33(1):177–186
Bengtsson J (2001) Manufacturing flexibility and real options: A review. Int J Prod Econ 74:213–224
MacDougall SL, Pike RH (2003) Consider your options: changes to strategic value during implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. Omega 31:1–15
Tigeorgis L (1999) Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation, 4th edn. The MIT Press, Boston
Trigeorgis L (1993) Real options and interactions with financial flexibility. Fin Manage 22(3):202–224
Kensinger JW (1988) The capital investment project as a set of investment options. Manage Fin 14:16–27
Pyoun YS, Choi BK (1994) Quantifying the flexibility value in automated manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 13(2):108–118
Son YK, Park CS (1987) Economic measure of productivity, quality and flexibility in advanced manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 6(3):193–206
Falkner CH, Benhajla S (1990) Multi-attribute decision models in the justification of CIM systems. Eng Econ 35(2):91–114
Parkan C, Wu ML (1999) Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection. Comp Ind Eng 36:503–523
Wabalickis RN (1988) Justification of FMS with analytic hierarchy process. J Manuf Syst 7(3):175–182
Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Yoon KS (1987) A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. J Oper Res Soc 38(3):277–286
Yoon KS, Kim GT (1989) Multiple attribute decision analysis with imprecise information. IIE Trans 21(1):21–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, G., Kim, Y. An expository note on an economic justification of investments in advanced manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 934–941 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2046-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2046-2