Abstract
Several techniques have been described to repair tibial spine avulsion fractures. Most of these methods use either internal fixation with a screw or suture fixation over a tibial tunnel bone bridge. This article presents a new technique for the surgical management of tibial spine avulsion fractures. The technique involves the creation of a suture mattress to compress and reduce the tibial spine into its fracture bed. The advantages of this technique are that it creates four points of fixation, aids with reduction, and allows for compression of the tibial spine fragment anatomically in its fracture bed.
Level of evidence V.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Isolated tibial spine avulsion fractures are relatively uncommon with an incidence of approximately 3 per 100,000/year [6]. This fracture typically occurs in the skeletally immature patient but the prevalence in the young adult has been increasing. Similar to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, tibial spine fractures can occur from multiple injuries such as falls, skiing, soccer and football injuries, and motor vehicle accidents [1, 5].
Classification of these fractures is based on the Meyers and McKeever classification system, which was later modified by Zaricznyj [12, 22]. Type I fractures are minimally or non-displaced fractures, type II are partially displaced or hinged, type III are completely displaced with no cortical contact, and type IV fractures are completely displaced and comminuted. Surgical management is often reserved for type II fractures with greater than 2 mm displacement as well as type III and type IV injuries. Other surgical indications include a mechanical block with diminished range of motion and patients presenting with a locked knee.
This injury can be addressed by open reduction and internal fixation [7, 16]; however, arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation has gained in popularity. Several methods of arthroscopic treatment have been described with relatively high success rates [2, 3, 10–12, 15, 17, 20, 21]. These techniques include the use of various fixation devices such as wires [4, 14], screws [3, 17], sutures [2, 10, 15, 19, 21], and suture anchors [11, 20]. They often rely on a single point of fixation or tethering the ACL until taught. However, we have found that tibial spine avulsions are frequently comminuted or can have only a small bony fragment, making screw fixation not possible in many cases. Additionally, most other fixation methods can be technically challenging and can result in malreduction of the tibial spine fracture.
This article describes a new technique to address tibial spine avulsions that is analogous to the double-row, trans-osseous equivalent or suture bridge techniques initially developed for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and later adapted for internal reduction and fixation of greater tuberosity fractures [8, 9, 18]. This procedure provides four points of fixation which, in the same fashion as it does in rotator cuff repair, increases the area of contact [13], and is a concept that is already familiar to arthroscopic surgeons. This technique is applicable to all types of avulsion fractures. It allows for a simple reproducible anatomic reduction and compression of the fracture fragment and tensioning of the ACL employing commonly used arthroscopic maneuvers and instruments.
Technical note
The procedure begins with a standard diagnostic arthroscopy to rule out any coexisting intra-articular pathology and exclude intra-substance tearing of the ACL. Once complete, attention is shifted to debridement of the bed of the fractured tibial spine, debriding it of any blood clot or fibrous tissue. An arthroscopic shaver (Dyonics 4.5 mm Incisor Plus, Smith & Nephew Andover, US) is used for debridement. Soft tissues, such as the anterior horn of the meniscus or the intermeniscal ligament, may also impede reduction and may need to be manipulated in order to reduce the fractured tibial spine. A trial reduction is attempted in order to ensure an anatomic reduction either with an arthroscopic probe or with percutaneous Kirschner wires. Knee extension aids in reduction of the fragment. Once satisfied with reduction, arthroscopic cannulae (8.5 mm Clear-Trac cannula, Smith & Nephew Andover, US) are used in the medial and lateral inferopatellar portals to aid with subsequent suture management. Two suture anchors (Twin Fix Ab 4.5 mm, Smith & Nephew, Andover, US) are inserted through the medial and lateral parapatellar portals respectively and placed in the posterior aspect of the fracture (Fig. 1).
Next, an arthroscopic suture passer (Accu-Pass, Smith & Nephew, Andover, US) is inserted into the knee through a transpatellar tendon portal. Each of the suture limbs from the anchors implanted posterior to the fragment is shuttled sequentially through a separate path through the substance of the ACL footprint creating a mattress type configuration. The tibial spine fragment is then reduced using a combination of manipulation of the fragment and knee extension. The sutures are then tensioned and fixed into the bone anterior to the reduced tibial spine fragment using two knotless anchors (3.5 mm Bio Push-lock anchors, Arthrex, Naples, US). One limb from each of the posterior anchors is threaded through each of the knotless anchors and inserted into pre-tapped holes anterior to the avulsion fracture completing the suture mattress (Fig. 1). The suture mattress provides a compressive force and secures the reduced tibial spine (Fig. 2).
Discussion
The most important difference from this technique compared to others is that it can be applied to all types of tibial spine avulsion fractures. Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of tibial spine injuries is an accepted treatment for displaced tibial spine avulsion fractures. Arthroscopically treated avulsion fractures show excellent results with Lysholm scores ranging from 92 to 100 [2, 11, 15, 20]. However, due to multiple factors including technical ease, the size of the fragment and comminution of the fragment, arthroscopic fixation can be challenging. In addition, since the injury is more common in the skeletally immature population, physeal sparring techniques may offer an advantage over transphyseal tunnel techniques. Finally, techniques using minimal fixation or resorbable fixation may be beneficial in terms of allowing for an easy revision to an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in case of failure or suboptimal function. Given excellent results of arthroscopically treated ACL avulsion fractures, the morbidity of an open procedure can be justifiably avoided with the development of consistent and reproducible arthroscopic techniques.
This technique uses standard arthroscopy portals, does not require additional incisions related to conventional trans-tibial tunnel bone bridge procedures, and uses readily available suture anchors and a technique that is analogous to a commonly used suture bridge method in rotator cuff repair. Therefore, adapting this technique for use in the knee should be relatively simple for surgeons already facile in arthroscopic suture management.
The limitations of this technique are the facts that it has been used in relatively few patients to date and has not been accompanied with clinical outcome scores. A prospective multi-centered trial would be of benefit to elucidate its efficacy compared to currently established techniques.
The technique applies the suture bridge principle with four-point fixation to the fracture fragment allowing for compression of the avulsed fragment and thus maximizes the surface area for bony healing. Not only does it apply the concept of tensioning the ACL with sutures through its substance, but also applies direct compressive forces to the osseous fragment without the risk of causing comminution. In fact, a comminuted tibial spine avulsion can theoretically be treated in the same fashion and hence the relevance of this new technique.
Conclusion
This new technique to repair tibial spine avulsion fractures has several advantages. It tensions the ACL, anatomically reduces and compresses the osseous fragment from the fractured tibial spine, and it incorporates arthroscopic maneuvers well practiced to the everyday arthroscopist.
References
Aderinto J, Walmsley P, Keating JF (2008) Fractures of the tibial spine: epidemiology and outcome. Knee 15(3):164–167
Ahn JH, Yoo JC (2005) Clinical outcome of arthroscopic reduction and suture for displace acute and chronic tibial spine fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(2):116–121
Davies EM, McLaren MI (2001) Type III tibial spine avulsion treated with arthroscopic Acutrak TM screw reattachment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:205–208
Gan Y, Xu D, Ding J, Xu Y (2011) Tension band wire fixation for anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture: biomechanical comparison of four fixation techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1649-z
Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Tong CWC, Ming CK (2004) Cruciate ligament avulsion fractures. Arthroscopy 20(8):803–812
Hargrove R, Parsons S, Payne R (2004) Anterior tibial spine fracture—an easy fracture to miss. Accid Emerg Nurs 12(3):173–175
Janarv PM, Westblad P, Johansson C, Hirsch G (1995) Long-term follow-up of anterior tibial spine fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 15(1):63–68
Ji JH, Kim WY, Ra KH (2007) Arthroscopic double-row suture anchor fixation of minimally displaced greater tuberosity fractures. Arthroscopy 23(10):1133.e1–1133.e4
Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim YM (2008) Arthroscopic fixation for displaced greater tuberosity fracture using the suture-bridge technique. Arthroscopy 24(1):120.e1–120.e3
Lehman RA Jr, Murphy KP, Machen MP, Kuklo TR (2003) Modified arthroscopic suture fixation of a displace tibial eminence fracture. Arthroscopy 19(2):E6
Lu XW, Hu XP, Jin C, Zhu T, Ding Y, Dai LY (2010) Reduction and fixation of the avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence using mini-open technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1476–1480
Meyers MH, McKeever FM (1959) Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg 41(2):209–222
Millett PJ, Braun S (2009) The “bony Bankart bridge” procedure: a new arthroscopic technique for reduction and internal fixation of a boney Bankart lesion. Arthroscopy 25(1):102–105
Osti L, Merlo F, Liu SH, Bocchi L (2000) A simple modified arthroscopic procedure for fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures. Arthroscopy 16(4):379–382
Perugia D, Basiglini A, Vadala A, Ferretti A (2009) Clinical and radiological results of arthroscopically treated tibial spine fractures in childhood. Int Orthop 33(1):243–248
Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GM, Kager J, Goslings JC, Marti RK, Raaymakers EL (2009) Tibial spine fractures: a long-term follow-up study of open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):203–207
Reynders P, Reynders K, Broos P (2002) Pediatric and adolescent tibial eminence fractures: arthroscopic cannulated screw fixation. J Trauma 53(1):49–54
Song HS, Williams GR Jr (2008) Arthroscopic reduction and fixation with suture-bridge technique for displaced or comminuted greater tuberosity fractures. Arthroscopy 24(8):956–960
Su WR, Wang PH, Wang HN, Lin CJ (2011) A simple, modified arthroscopic suture fixation of avulsion fracture of the tibial intercondylar eminence in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 20:17–21
Vega JR, Irribarra LA, Baar AK, Iniguez M, Salgado M, Gana N (2008) Arthroscopic fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a new growth plate-sparing method. Arthroscopy 24(11):1239–1243
Yang SW, Lu YC, Teng HP, Wong CY (2005) Arthroscopic reduction and suture fixation of displaced tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(4):272–276
Zaricznyj B (1977) Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence: treatment by open reduction and pinning. J Bone Joint Surg 59(8):1111–1114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mann, M.A., Desy, N.M. & Martineau, P.A. A new procedure for tibial spine avulsion fracture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 2395–2398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1906-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1906-9