Abstract
Purpose
Necrotising soft-tissue infections (NSTI) are characterised by necrosis, fast progression, and high rates of morbidity and mortality, but our knowledge is primarily derived from small prospective studies and retrospective studies.
Methods
We performed an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of adults with NSTI describing patient’s characteristics and associations between baseline variables and microbiological findings, amputation, and 90-day mortality.
Results
We included 409 patients with NSTI; 402 were admitted to the ICU. Cardiovascular disease [169 patients (41%)] and diabetes [98 (24%)] were the most common comorbidities; 122 patients (30%) had no comorbidity. Before surgery, bruising of the skin [210 patients (51%)] and pain requiring opioids [172 (42%)] were common. The sites most commonly affected were the abdomen/ano-genital area [140 patients (34%)] and lower extremities [126 (31%)]. Monomicrobial infection was seen in 179 patients (44%). NSTI of the upper or lower extremities was associated with monomicrobial group A streptococcus (GAS) infection, and NSTI located to the abdomen/ano-genital area was associated with polymicrobial infection. Septic shock [202 patients (50%)] and acute kidney injury [82 (20%)] were common. Amputation occurred in 22% of patients with NSTI of an extremity and was associated with higher lactate level. All-cause 90-day mortality was 18% (95% CI 14–22); age and higher lactate levels were associated with increased mortality and GAS aetiology with decreased mortality.
Conclusions
Patients with NSTI were heterogeneous regarding co-morbidities, initial symptoms, infectious localisation, and microbiological findings. Higher age and lactate levels were associated with increased mortality, and GAS infection with decreased mortality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Patients with necrotising soft-tissue infections were heterogeneous regarding comorbidities, initial symptoms, infectious localisation, and microbiological findings. Higher age and higher lactate levels were associated with increased risk of death and group A streptococcus aetiology was associated with decreased risk. The heterogeneity of the patients regarding disease severity and microbes suggests that improved survival is accomplished through increased stratification and individualised targeted treatment. |
Introduction
Necrotising soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is characterised by necrosis of the deep soft tissue, often with rapid progression along the subcutaneous fasciae [1]. There is great variety in NSTIs, including necrotising cellulitis, necrotising fasciitis type I, type II, and myositis. Regardless of infection category, prompt surgery, antibiotics, and organ support are the cornerstones of treatment [2], but despite multimodal management, morbidity and mortality remain high [3], and the survivor’s quality of life is reduced [4]. The infection is often polymicrobial, but monomicrobial NSTI caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus, GAS) is also frequent [1]. The incidence rate varies considerably between studies, but was estimated to 4.5 per 100,000 inhabitants per year in the United States in 2005 [5]. Awareness is critical as it is an important differential diagnosis to common and less severe skin infections [6]. A scoring system to aid clinical decision-making has been developed [7], but its performance remains questionable [8]. Few prospective studies have been performed, and current knowledge is primarily derived from retrospective single centre studies. We designed the ‘Improving Outcome of Necrotising Fasciitis: Elucidation of Complex Host and Pathogen Signatures that Dictate Severity of Tissue Infection’ (INFECT) observational study to provide detailed clinical information on patients with NSTI and to explore associations between clinical features and outcome [9]. The INFECT observational study is part of the INFECT project, which aims at advancing our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in NSTI [10], and the clinical data in the present study will support the basic science findings, contributing to improve patient outcome in NSTI.
Methods
Study design and patients
We did an international, multicentre, prospective, cohort study of adult patients with NSTI at five Scandinavian hospitals, all of which were referral centres for NSTI. Patients admitted at surrounding hospitals with confirmed or strong suspicion of NSTI were referred to these centres. All patients admitted or transferred to one of the study hospitals with confirmed or suspected NSTI were screened for eligibility; if the medical staff suspected NSTI, a dedicated team on call 24/7 to enrol patients was contacted. The diagnosis was determined by the surgeon doing either the primary operation or revision and was based on findings of necrotic or deliquescent soft tissue with undermining of the surrounding tissue. All patient files were subsequently reviewed by project personnel, and patients whose surgical description did not include findings of NSTI were excluded. Patients were also excluded if consent could not be obtained. All patients were treated according to the local protocols for management of NSTI at the respective hospitals, including repeated surgical revisions, broad-spectrum antibiotics, intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (IVIG), hyperbaric oxygenation therapy (HBOT), and intensive care [Table S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM)].
The study was approved by the national or regional ethics committees and data protections agencies in all countries. Written informed consent was obtained from every patient or their legal surrogate as soon as possible. In all cases, consent was obtained from the patient when possible. The protocol and statistical analysis plan have been published previously [9]. The INFECT project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01790698. We report the study in accordance with the STROBE reporting guidelines [11]. All authors vouch for the adherence to the study protocol and the accuracy and completeness of the data and analyses. The INFECT project was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program under the Grant agreement 305340.
Outcomes
The primary objective of the study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with NSTI. Secondary outcomes included identification of associations between affected body part and microbiological findings; identification of baseline characteristics associated with amputation of the extremities; associations between affected body part, acute kidney injury, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) score [7], and LRINEC scored risk of NSTI and 90-day mortality; and associations between predefined baseline characteristics and 90-day mortality. Finally, an exploratory analysis included associations between all baseline characteristics and 90-day mortality.
Statistical analysis
We expected to enrol 400–500 patients based on previous rates of NSTI admissions to the participating hospitals and an enrolment period of approximately 54 months. We expressed continuous data as medians with interquartile ranges, categorical data as proportions, results from logistic regression analyses as odds ratios including 95% confidence intervals (CI), and results from Cox proportional hazards model as hazard ratios including 95% CI. We differed from our statistical analysis plan, as we did not report relative risks. Seven patients were not admitted to the intensive-care unit (ICU) after initial surgery; data for these patients were not included in descriptions of treatment and length of stay, as we did not have detailed data on these patients, but data were included in all analyses. Further details are given in the ESM and Ref. [9].
Role of the funding source
The funders and sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors reviewed the final manuscript and approved submission.
Results
From February 19, 2013 to June 30, 2017, we screened 525 patients and enrolled 409 of these (Fig. 1). We excluded 90 patients after they had been transferred to one of the study sites and assessed by a surgeon as not having NSTI. After a secondary review of the patient files, we omitted an additional 20 patients, because surgical findings were not consistent with NSTI. 402 (98%) of the patients were admitted to the ICU.
Clinical characteristics, blood values, and risk score
The patient’s characteristics from the first 24 h in the ICU are presented in Table 1 and in Tables S2, S3 (ESM). All patients had undergone at least one operation before admittance to the ICU, and treatment (including antibiotics, fluids, and organ support) had been initiated. Half the patients (202) had septic shock and 20% (82) had acute kidney injury. Laboratory values from the first 24 h are presented in Table S4 (ESM). Among the patient symptoms and signs registered before initial surgery, skin bruising [210 patients (51%)] and severe pain requiring opioid analgesics [172 patients (42%)] were the most common. LRINEC scored risk of NSTI was available in 376 patients; 212 (56%) were categorised as having high risk of NSTI, 91 (24%) with moderate risk, and 73 (19%) with low risk (Table S5, ESM).
Microbiological findings
Polymicrobial infections were found in 204 (50%) patients, and 179 (44%) had a monomicrobial infection; GAS was found in 126 (31%) patients (Table S6, ESM). In the remaining 26 (6%) patients, no microbes were identified. Microbiological findings by affected body part are presented in Fig. 2, and a detailed list of microorganisms in Table S7 (ESM) and patients with positive cultures in Table S8 (ESM).
Interventions
The median time from hospital admission to surgery, including that of patients initially admitted for other reasons than NSTI, was 19 h (IQR 6–43), the median number of surgical procedures during ICU stay was 4 (IQR 3–5), and 54 of 402 (13%) patients underwent amputation of an extremity or penis (Table 2 and Table S9, ESM). Antibiotic treatment included a beta-lactam [386/402 (96%)] and clindamycin [394/402 (98%)] in most patients. In the ICU, a total of 376/402 (94%) patients were mechanically ventilated [median duration: 5 days (IQR 3–11)], 331/402 (82%) were given vasopressors or inotropes, and 78/402 (19%) underwent renal-replacement therapy [median duration: 6 days (IQR 3–15)]. Adjuvant therapy with IVIG was given to 232/402 (58%) patients and HBOT to 322/402 (80%).
Follow-up
Patients had a median ICU stay of 7 days (IQR 4–13), including patients subsequently transferred to ICUs in other hospitals, and the median percentage of days alive and out of hospital in the 90 days after inclusion was 51 (IQR 1–72) (Table S11, ESM). All-cause mortality was 14% at day 30 (95% CI 11–18) and 18% at day 90 (95% CI 14–22) (Fig. 3 and Table S11, ESM).
Variables associated with microbiological findings, amputation, and mortality
NSTI located to the upper extremities was associated with monomicrobial GAS and Staphylococcus aureus infection (OR 7.80, 95% CI 4.36–14.25; p < 0.0001; and OR 5.80, 95% CI 1.61–21.60; p = 0.0184, respectively) (Table S12, ESM and Fig. 2). Infection of the lower extremities was associated with monomicrobial GAS, group C and G streptococcus, and clostridial species (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.18–3.09; p = 0.0266; OR 9.76, 95% CI 2.57–54.85; p = 0.0008; and OR 9.47, 95% CI 1.85–92.85; p = 0.0102). Finally, NSTI of the abdomen and ano-genital area was associated with polymicrobial infection (OR 8.01, 95% CI 4.95–13.15; p < 0.0001).
A total of 196 (48%) patients had NSTI located to either upper or lower extremities; 43 (22%) of these had an extremity amputated. Only higher lactate level was statistically significantly associated with amputation of an extremity (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13; p = 0.0194) (Table S13, ESM). Seventeen patients had missing data in one or more of the included variables. In an analysis including only complete cases, results were consistent with the primary analysis.
Higher age and higher baseline lactate level were associated with higher 90-day mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.10; p < 0.0001 and OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15–1.37; p < 0.0001, respectively) (Table 3); the presence of GAS was associated with lower 90-day mortality (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.45; p = 0.0004). Alcohol consumption was omitted from the analysis due to the large amount of missing data [97 patients (24%)]. Complete cases analysis, analysis including alcohol consumption, and the exploratory analysis supported the primary analysis (Tables S14, S15 and S17, S18, ESM).
Post hoc, unadjusted analyses showed that 90-day mortality in patients with septic shock was higher than in patients without (26% vs 9%; OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.92–5.97; p < 0.001) (Table S19, ESM), and that patients with NSTI caused by GAS had higher rate of septic shock (65% vs 45%; OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.45–3.50; p = 0.0003) and lower 90-day mortality (10% vs 22%; OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21–0.77; p = 0.0058) (Table S20, ESM).
Discussion
In this international, prospective cohort study, we observed that patients with NSTI presented with bruising of the skin in 51% of cases and severe pain requiring analgesics in 42%. Necrotising soft-tissue infection was caused by a variety of different pathogens, affected every body part, and was associated with high rates of septic shock and acute kidney injury at arrival to the referral hospital. Necrotising soft-tissue infection located to the upper and lower extremities was associated with monomicrobial infection by GAS, whereas NSTI located to the abdomen and ano-genital area was associated with polymicrobial infection. Amputation of an extremity occurred in 22%, and higher lactate level was associated with amputation. All-cause mortality at day 90 was 18%; higher age and higher lactate level were associated with increased 90-day mortality, and the presence of GAS was associated with decreased mortality.
Only few and small prospective studies have included patients with NSTI. It is a paradox that this very sick group of patients is only poorly described, limiting advances in diagnostics and treatment. The overall aim of the international INFECT project was to explore the pathogenesis and host–microbe interactions of NSTIs [10], and with this study, we provide detailed clinical characteristics and microbe distribution that potentially can be used as targets for future diagnostics or therapy. To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study of patients with NSTI.
The mortality rates observed in our study are lower than those reported in most previous, retrospective observational studies [3, 12], but higher than the 28-day mortality rate of 10% in a recent randomised trial [13]. In many retrospective studies, in-hospital mortality has been used, and in some studies, the time of assessing mortality was not specified [14]. In our study, patients were managed at referral hospitals for NSTI with the capacity and logistics to deliver multidisciplinary management; early surgery with many revisions, and broad-spectrum antibiotics, and a large proportion of patients received adjuvant HBOT and IVIG. This may have influenced mortality rates. Patients were included prospectively which may have resulted in the inclusion of less severe cases of NSTI. However, we may have missed patients that were considered too sick for transport or died before referral. We have no data on resistance to antibiotics in the microbiological cultures, but as all centres were in Scandinavia, the frequencies of antibiotic-resistant strains were likely low (Table S21, ESM). As most patients received a carbapenem and clindamycin, we expect that most patients were treated with antibiotics covering the infective organism.
Interestingly, we observed an association between the anatomical site infected and microbiological aetiology, rendering it possible to categorise NSTI patients at an anatomical level. Necrotising soft-tissue infections located to the upper and lower extremities was associated with monomicrobial infections, predominantly GAS, whereas NSTI located to the abdomen and ano-genital area was associated with polymicrobial infection, where a mixture of anaerobic and intestinal microbes was commonly seen. Group A streptococcus was infrequently accompanied by other microbes and most often then with Staphylococcus aureus. We found GAS infection in 31% of patients. In other studies, rates of GAS infection varied considerably, ranging from 9 to 50% [15,16,17,18]. In our patients infected with GAS, the mortality rate of 10% was similar to rates previously observed [19,20,21], but lower than in patients with other microorganisms. This association has not been consistently observed in other observational studies [3, 15, 22]. Apparently, patients with NSTI caused by GAS have higher rates of septic shock, have less comorbidities, and do not differ in age as compared with non-GAS patients (Table S20 in the ESM). Possibly, the lower rate of comorbidities can be part of the explanation for the lower mortality rate observed in these patients.
Higher lactate level was associated with an increased risk of amputation of an extremity and 90-day mortality. As elevated lactate is part of the definition of septic shock [23], it is likely that patients with septic shock have higher mortality rates and levels of amputation. Elevated lactate could also be a sign of local ischemia.
Many patients had comorbidities, but worth noting, 122 (30%) patients had no comorbidities registered. We observed no association between diabetes or high body mass index and 90-day mortality. This was unexpected as both have previously been associated with increased mortality in patients with NSTI and in sepsis [24, 25], but it may be difficult to compare the results of previous retrospective studies with our result.
At Copenhagen and Stockholm, > 15% of the patients had undergone surgery in the 4 weeks preceding the NSTI. If the infection developed as a complication to this procedure, these patients might represent a subgroup of NSTI patients with a different course and bacterial aetiology. The larger proportion of postoperative patients could also be due to a larger quantity and more complex surgical operations being performed at these centres. More than half of the patients received IVIG as adjuvant treatment. Intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G is used for the treatment of NSTIs [26], and it was part of the protocolised treatment for NSTIs in Copenhagen, and given on specific indications—mainly GAS infection—at the other centres. One hundred of the patients included in Copenhagen were also included in a randomised placebo-controlled trial on IVIG for NSTI, where no difference in physical quality of life or other outcomes were observed between the groups [27]. Most patients also received adjuvant HBOT, as this was part of protocolised treatment at the study centres. There are no high-quality data to support or refute the use of HBOT, and suggestions based on the present literature vary [2, 6]. In retrospective studies, the time from diagnosis to surgery has been associated with increased in-hospital mortality [28]. However, it is difficult to pinpoint this time, especially when data are retrieved retrospectively, and we chose not to include time to surgery in our analysis. Given the observational design, we could not say whether the interventions observed in our study had any impact on 90-day mortality or other outcomes.
In our cohort, 73 (19%) patients were categorised as having a low risk of NSTI by the LRINEC score, and we observed no association between increased LRINEC score or moderate-to-high risk of NSTI by the LRINEC score and 90-day mortality. Although the LRINEC score was not developed as a tool to predict outcome in patients with NSTI, we a priori assumed an association between increased LRINEC score and death. The LRINEC score was developed in a population of patients with NSTI included retrospectively, with a high risk of selection bias, and was validated in another retrospective cohort [7]. A recent review of the LRINEC score including 846 patients found a receiving operating characteristic curve with an area under curve of 0.927 [29], and it was concluded that the LRINEC score was a useful clinical determinant in the diagnosis and surgical treatment in patients with NSTI. Despite the fact that our population was different, as we only included patients with confirmed NSTI, our findings do not support this statement, and are in line with the results of a recent meta-analysis [8].
Our study has certain limitations. For some data, we had to rely solely on source data, and some characteristics may be less precise, e.g., initial symptoms. In the definition of acute kidney injury, urine output was not assessed, and preadmission creatinine was estimated. We had to omit alcohol consumption from the logistic regression analysis due to missing data and we had limited power for some of the association analyses. As it was an observational study, we cannot make causative inferences. All including centres were in Scandinavia, limiting generalisability. A greater proportion of patients were included in Copenhagen. In Denmark, patients with NSTI are referred to Copenhagen University Hospital, and this could in part explain the higher number of patients included at this site.
The strengths of our study include the prospective multicentre design, the inclusion of patients by a dedicated team, and the publication of our protocol and statistical analysis plan. Our sample size and event rate for death were close to predicted and we had a high rate of follow-up and data completeness.
In conclusion, our international study showed that NSTI patients at the five study centres were heterogeneous regarding co-morbidities, initial symptoms, infectious localisation, and microbiological findings, and we demonstrated unique, clinical endotypes. Patients received appropriate antibiotics and multiple surgical revisions, and many patients were treated with adjuvant IVIG and HBOT. We observed that age and higher lactate level were associated with increased risks of 90-day mortality, and the presence of GAS was associated with a decreased risk. The heterogeneity of the patients regarding comorbidities, disease severity, and microbes suggests that further improvement of outcome requires more individualised treatment, addressing both host vulnerability and pathogen-specific mechanisms.
References
Stevens DL, Bryant AE (2017) Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. N Engl J Med 377:2253–2265
Sartelli M, Guirao X, Hardcastle TC et al (2018) 2018 WSES/SIS-E consensus conference: recommendations for the management of skin and soft-tissue infections. World J Emerg Surg 13:58
Hua C, Sbidian E, Hemery F et al (2015) Prognostic factors in necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTI): a cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:1006–12.e8
Hakkarainen TW, Burkette Ikebata N, Bulger E, Evans HL (2014) Moving beyond survival as a measure of success: understanding the patient experience of necrotizing soft-tissue infections. J Surg Res 192:143–149
Soltani AM, Best MJ, Francis CS, et al (2014) Trends in the incidence and treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infections: an analysis of the national hospital discharge survey. J Burn Care Res 1–6
Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF et al (2014) Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 59:147–159
Wong C-H, Khin L-W, Heng K-S et al (2004) The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med 32:1535–1541
Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W et al (2019) Necrotizing soft tissue infection: diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, imaging, and LRINEC score: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 269:58–65
Madsen MB, Skrede S, Bruun T et al (2018) Necrotizing soft tissue infections—a multicentre, prospective observational study (INFECT): protocol and statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 62:272–279
Improving Outcome of Necrotizing Fasciitis: Elucidation of complex host and pathogen signatures that dictate severity of tissue infection. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/106297/factsheet/en. Accessed 25 Mar 2019
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England) 370:1453–1457
May AK (2009) Skin and soft tissue infections. Surg Clin North Am 89:403–420
Bulger EM, Maier RV, Sperry J et al (2014) A novel drug for treatment of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 149:528
Govindan S, Prescott HC, Chopra V, Iwashyna TJ (2018) Sample size implications of mortality definitions in sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Trials 19:198
Kao LS, Lew DF, Arab SN et al (2011) Local variations in the epidemiology, microbiology, and outcome of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: a multicenter study. Am J Surg 202:139–145
Proud D, Bruscino Raiola F, Holden D, et al (2014) Are we getting necrotizing soft tissue infections right? A 10-year review. ANZ J Surg 84
Chen I-C, Li W-C, Hong Y-C et al (2011) The microbiological profile and presence of bloodstream infection influence mortality rates in necrotizing fasciitis. Crit Care 15:R152
Das DK, Baker MG, Venugopal K (2012) Risk factors, microbiological findings and outcomes of necrotizing fasciitis in New Zealand: a retrospective chart review. BMC Infect Dis 12:348
Darenberg J, Luca-Harari B, Jasir A et al (2007) Molecular and clinical characteristics of invasive group A streptococcal infection in Sweden. Clin Infect Dis 45:450–458
Lin J-N, Chang L-L, Lai C-H et al (2013) Group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 45:781–788
Bruun T, Kittang BR, de Hoog BJ et al (2013) Necrotizing soft tissue infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis of groups C and G in western Norway. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E545–E550
Anaya DA, McMahon K, Nathens AB et al (2005) Predictors of mortality and limb loss in necrotizing soft tissue infections. Arch Surg 140:151–157
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:801
Arif N, Yousfi S, Vinnard C (2016) Deaths from necrotizing fasciitis in the United States, 2003–2013. Epidemiol Infect 144:1338–1344
Beck MK, Jensen AB, Nielsen AB et al (2016) Diagnosis trajectories of prior multi-morbidity predict sepsis mortality. Sci Rep 6:36624
de Prost N, Sbidian E, Chosidow O et al (2015) Management of necrotizing soft tissue infections in the intensive care unit: results of an international survey. Intensive Care Med 41:1506–1508
Madsen MB, Hjortrup PB, Hansen MB et al (2017) Immunoglobulin G for patients with necrotising soft tissue infection (INSTINCT): a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 43:1585–1593
Boyer A, Vargas F, Coste F et al (2009) Influence of surgical treatment timing on mortality from necrotizing soft tissue infections requiring intensive care management. Intensive Care Med 35:847–853
Bechar J, Sepehripour S, Hardwicke J, Filobbos G (2017) Laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis (LRINEC) score for the assessment of early necrotising fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:341–346
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963
Kellum JA, Lameire N (2013) Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care 17:204
Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA et al (2004) Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care 8:R204–R212
Wallace AB (1951) The exposure treatment of burns. Lancet 257:501–504
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710
Acknowledgements
The INFECT study group includes: Daniel Bidstrup, Nina F. Bærnthsen, Gladis H. Frendø, Erik C. Jansen, Lærke B. Madsen, Rasmus B. Müller, Emilie M. J. Pedersen, Marie W. Petersen: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1127-9599, Frederikke Ravn, Isabel F. G. Smidt-Nielsen, Anna M. Wahl, Sandra Wulffeld, Sara Aronsson, Anders Rosemar, Joakim Trogen, Torbjørn Nedrebø, Oddvar Oppegaard, Eivind Rath, and Marianne Sævik. Author affiliations are given in the ESM.
This work is part of the INFECT programme, supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under the Grant agreement 305340. We are grateful to patients and relatives for their consent to participate, and to the clinical staff and research staff at the study sites for their important contributions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
SS, AP, ECJ, TB, ANT, and OH contributed to the conception and the design of the study. MBM, SS, PA, MN, TB, MBH, PP, MH, AR, DB, NFB, GHF, LBM, RM, EMJP, FR, IFGSM, AMW, SW, SA, JT, TN, OO, and ER were involved in the acquisition of data. MBM, SS, AP, TB, ES, FB, VAPMS, ANT, and OH contributed to analysis or interpretation of data or both. MBM, AP, and OH were involved in drafting the manuscript. MBM, SS, AP, MN, TB, MBH, AR, ES, VAPMS, NFB, OO, ER, ANT, and OH critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, has received research funds from CSL Behring, Switzerland, Fresenius Kabi, Germany, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Denmark.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madsen, M.B., Skrede, S., Perner, A. et al. Patient’s characteristics and outcomes in necrotising soft-tissue infections: results from a Scandinavian, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 45, 1241–1251 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05730-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05730-x