Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
The aim of the study was to determine the association between IRS1 G972R polymorphism and type 2 diabetes; published data concerning this association have been conflicting. To obtain further insight into this topic, we performed a meta-analysis of all available case–control studies.
Methods
We performed a meta-analysis of 32 studies (12,076 cases and 11,285 controls).
Results
The relatively infrequent R972 variant was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96–1.23, p = 0.184 under a dominant model). Some evidence of heterogeneity was observed across studies (p = 0.1). In the 14 studies (9,713 individuals) in which the mean age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis was available, this variable explained 52% of the heterogeneity (p = 0.03). When these studies were subdivided into tertiles of mean age at diagnosis, the OR for diabetes was 1.48 (95% CI 1.17–1.87), 1.22 (95% CI 0.97–1.53) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68–1.13) in the youngest, intermediate and oldest tertile, respectively (p = 0.0022 for trend of ORs).
Conclusions/interpretation
Our findings illustrate the difficulties of ascertaining the contribution of ‘low-frequency–low-risk’ variants to type 2 diabetes susceptibility. In the specific context of the R972 variant, ~200,000 study individuals would be needed to have 80% power to identify a 9% increase in diabetes risk at a genome-wide significance level. Under these circumstances, a strategy aimed at improving outcome definition and decreasing its heterogeneity may critically enhance our ability to detect genetic effects, thereby decreasing the required sample size. Our data suggest that focusing on early-onset diabetes, which is characterised by a stronger genetic background, may be part of such a strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Despite the recent advances resulting from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), most of the genetic factors contributing to type 2 diabetes remain undetermined [1]. IRS-1 is an important member of a protein family phosphorylated by the insulin receptor upon its binding with insulin [2]. Tissue-specific knockout mice have shown that IRS-1 is necessary for in vivo insulin action and secretion [2]. A relatively infrequent glycine to arginine substitution at position 972 of IRS1 (G972R or rs1801278, minor allele frequency [MAF] ranging from 0.02 to 0.10 in the four different population samples available from HapMap) has been extensively investigated as a determinant of type 2 diabetes susceptibility. In vitro studies have shown that the R972 allele results in a loss of IRS-1 function, which impairs insulin signalling in several target tissues, including skeletal muscle, fat and pancreatic beta cells [2–4]. In vivo studies have reported an association between IRS1 R972 variant and both insulin resistance [2, 5] and reduced insulin secretion [2, 6]. The deleterious role of the R972 variant on in vivo insulin action and glucose homeostasis has been recently confirmed by studies in transgenic mice [7]. In spite of such strong evidence for a functional role, the data concerning the association of this variant with type 2 diabetes have been, thus far, conflicting. An initial meta-analyses of 27 studies indicated that R972 carriers had a 25% increase in type 2 diabetes risk [8], but subsequent large case–control studies have failed to replicate this association (in Table 1 of the Electronic supplementary material [ESM] see Zeggini et al. [9], Florez et al. [10] and van Dam et al. [11]). Unfortunately, neither the G972R variant nor good proxies in linkage disequilibrium with it (i.e. r 2 > 0.5) were included in the publicly available GWAS meta-analysis DIAGRAM [12].
To obtain further insight into the role of R972 in type 2 diabetes, we performed an updated meta-analysis of all case–control studies available to date (ESM Table 1). BMI and age at diabetes onset were analysed as covariates in meta-regression.
Methods
Study design
All case–control studies reported in previous meta-analyses [8] and all papers found in the PubMed database as of January 2009 by using ‘insulin receptor substrate-1’, ‘IRS-1’, ‘Gly972Arg’, ‘G972R’, ‘diabetes’, ‘variant’, ‘polymorphism’ and ‘genotype’ as keywords, were analysed. In addition, we included five unpublished case–control studies in which all study participants were self-reported whites: four sets from the Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in Italy and the United States (GENIUS T2D) Consortium [13] (N. Abate, A. Doria, G. Sesti and V. Trischitta) and one set recruited in Chieti, Italy (ESM Table 1; Cama A. sample) (S. Mammarella and A. Cama). Three of the published studies were excluded because they were subsets of these unpublished sets: in ESM Table 1 see Sigal et al. [14] of the GENIUS Boston sample, Mammarella et al. [15] and Esposito et al. [16] of the Cama A. sample.
Study individuals in unpublished samples
Controls in all unpublished samples were non-diabetic individuals with fasting plasma glucose <6.9 mmol/l and absence of drug treatment known to affect glucose metabolism. Cases were patients with type 2 diabetes defined according to the 2003 American Diabetes Association criteria.
DNA extraction and genotyping
DNA from the unpublished sets was extracted from whole blood by standard methods. Genotyping details are described in the methods section of the ESM.
Statistical methods
Cases and controls of all studies were tested for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) by means of an exact χ 2 test. Between-study heterogeneity and the possible presence of publication bias were assessed by Cochran’s Q test and Macaskill’s inverse pooled variance weighting method [17], respectively. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to estimate OR and to explore heterogeneity [18]. Where appropriate, permutation-resampling p values were calculated to address the risk of spurious significant results [19]. All the analyses were performed using SAS Statistical Package Release 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Of the 35 available studies, only those 32 that did not show significant deviations (exact p < 0.05) from HWE in cases or controls were considered in the meta-analysis (ESM Table 1). Given the small number of RR individuals (i.e. homozygous for the R972 variant) in 12 studies and their absence in the other 20 (a finding that could seriously bias the results of both additive and recessive models), we investigated only the dominant model, by comparing GR+RR (these latter when available) with GG individuals. Figure 1 shows the individual results from the 32 case–control studies, along with those of the meta-analysis, which included 12,076 cases and 11,285 controls. As for any meta-analysis performed on published genetic data, we cannot exclude the possibility that some sample overlap has occurred; however, by carefully reading the description of samples analysed in each study, this seems to be an unlikely event. No evidence of publication bias was observed p = 0.27). The ORs for association between R972 and type 2 diabetes ranged from 0.55 to 4.75. In the meta-analysis, the R972 variant did not show a significant association with type 2 diabetes (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96–1.23, p = 0.184). Some evidence of heterogeneity was observed across studies (Cochran’s Q test p = 0.1). In a meta-regression analysis, neither the mean BMI of cases nor that of controls (available in 23 studies corresponding to 20,114 individuals) significantly explained such heterogeneity (p = 0.58 and p = 0.84, respectively). Similar data were obtained when analyses were carried after stratifying for BMI status (i.e. <30 kg/m2 or ≥30 kg/m2) (p = 0.77). Also no effect of ethnicity (i.e. either white [19,075 individuals from 20 studies], Asian [2,699 individuals from eight studies] or other [1,587 individuals from four studies]) was observed (p = 0.91). Also, when only studies whose sample size was >500 individuals were analysed, a similar OR to that obtained in the whole meta-analysis was observed (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93–1.24). By contrast, the mean age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis (available in 14 studies corresponding to 9,713 individuals) was significantly correlated with the magnitude of the genetic effect, explaining 52% of the heterogeneity (p = 0.03) (Fig. 2a). When these studies were subdivided into tertiles of mean age at diagnosis, the summary OR of type 2 diabetes was 1.48 (95% CI 1.17–1.87) for studies in the youngest tertile (39–44.9 years), 1.22 (95% CI 0.97–1.53) for studies in the intermediate tertile (45–50.9 years), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68–1.13) for studies in the oldest tertile (51–58 years) (Fig. 2b). The standard p value for the decreasing trend of ORs with increasing mean age at diagnosis was 0.0022 and the permutation p value was 0.014.
Discussion
Our findings illustrate the difficulties of ascertaining contributions to type 2 diabetes susceptibility by ‘low-frequency–low-risk’ variants. Despite the fact that this study included more than 23,000 individuals, the power to identify a 9% increase in type 2 diabetes risk associated with a variant having 0.06 frequency was only 58% at nominal significance levels (α = 0.05) and virtually zero at genome-wide significance levels \( \left( {\alpha = 5 \times {{10}^{ - 8}}} \right) \). One can estimate that a total of ~40,000 and ~200,000 individuals would have been required to have 80% power at α = 0.05 and \( \left( {\alpha = 5 \times {{10}^{ - 8}}} \right) \), respectively. Under these circumstances, improving the outcome definition and decreasing its heterogeneity may have critical effects on our ability to identify genetic effects.
In our meta-analysis, studies in which the mean age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis was <45 years showed an OR for type 2 diabetes of 1.48, an effect size that a sample of ‘only’ ~8,500 individuals would have 80% power to detect with genome-wide significance. Similar data, indicating a stronger effect on early abnormality of glucose homeostasis, were recently reported for TCF7L2 [20] and for TRIB3 [10]. Unfortunately, no data on the combined effect of several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are singly associated with early glucose abnormalities are so far available. Overall, focusing on forms of diabetes diagnosed relatively early in life, which are known to have a stronger genetic component [21, 22], may be a useful strategy to facilitate the identification of SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes that are otherwise difficult to find, either because of their moderate effect or because of their low allelic frequency, or because of both factors, as in the case of IRS1 G972R. The usefulness of this approach may also extend to truly rare variants (MAF < 0.01), such as those that are believed to underlie the linkage peaks that are not explained by the common variants identified through GWAS. Indeed, in the linkage screen of the Diabetes UK Warren 2 sib pair collection, all seven linkage signals that were identified were stronger in families with an average age at diagnosis <55 years than in the families diagnosed at an older age [23].
In conclusion, the study of early-onset forms is emerging as a critical tool to reach the ‘high-hanging’ fruits of type 2 diabetes genetics and mirrors the approach taken with other complex disorders such as coronary artery disease [24]. Thus, both adequately powered new studies specifically targeted to early-onset cases and further analyses of available GWAS data after stratification by age at onset are needed.
Abbreviations
- GENIUS:
-
Genetics of type 2 diabetes in Italy and the United States
- GWAS:
-
Genome-wide association studies
- HWE:
-
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
- MAF:
-
Minor allele frequency
- SNP:
-
Single nucleotide polymorphism
References
Doria A, Patti ME, Kahn CR (2008) The emerging genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 8:186–200
Sesti G, Federici M, Hribal ML, Lauro D, Sbraccia P, Lauro R (2001) Defects of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) system in human metabolic disorders. FASEB J 15:2099–2111
Almind K, Inoue G, Pedersen O, Kahn CR (1996) A common amino acid polymorphism in insulin receptor substrate-1 causes impaired insulin signaling. Evidence from transfection studies. J Clin Invest 97:2569–2575
Marchetti P, Lupi R, Federici M et al (2002) Insulin secretory function is impaired in isolated human islets carrying the Gly9723Arg IRS-1 polymorphism. Diabetes 51:1419–1424
Clausen JO, Hansen T, Bjørbaek C et al (1995) Insulin resistance: interactions between obesity and a common variant of insulin receptor substrate-1. Lancet 346:397–402
Stumvoll M, Fritsche A, Volk A et al (2001) The Gly972Arg polymorphism in the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene contributes to the variation in insulin secretion in normal glucose-tolerant humans. Diabetes 50:882–885
Hribal ML, Tornei F, Pujol A et al (2008) Transgenic mice overexpressing human G972R IRS-1 show impaired insulin action and insulin secretion. J Cell Mol Med 12:2096–2106
Jellema A, Zeegers MP, Feskens EJ, Dagnelie PC, Mensink RP (2003) Gly972Arg variant in the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene and association with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of 27 studies. Diabetologia 46:990–995
Zeggini E, Parkinson J, Halford S et al (2004) Association studies of insulin receptor substrate 1 gene (IRS1) variants in type 2 diabetes samples enriched for family history and early age of onset. Diabetes 53:3319–3322
Florez JC, Sjögren M, Burtt N et al (2004) Association testing in 9,000 people fails to confirm the association of the insulin receptor substrate-1 G972R polymorphism with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 53:3313–3318
van Dam RM, Hoebee B, Seidell JC, Schaap MM, Blaak EE, Feskens EJ (2004) The insulin receptor substrate-1 Gly972Arg polymorphism is not associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in two population-based studies. Diabet Med 21:752–758
Zeggini E, Scott LJ, Saxena R et al (2008) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 40:638–645
Prudente S, Scarpelli D, Chandalia M et al (2009) The TRIB3 Q84R polymorphism and risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:190–196
Sigal RJ, Doria A, Warram JH, Krolewski AS (1996) Codon 972 polymorphism in the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene, obesity, and risk of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1657–1659
Mammarella S, Esposito DL, Creati B et al (1996) Mutational analysis of the insulin receptor substrate-1 in noninsulin dependent diabetes. Diabetologia 39(Suppl 1):A75 Abstract
Esposito DL, Li Y, Vanni C et al (2003) A novel T608R missense mutation in insulin receptor substrate-1 identified in a subject with type 2 diabetes impairs metabolic insulin signaling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1468–1475
Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L (2001) A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 20:641–654
van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T (2002) Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 21:589–624
Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2004) Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Stat Med 23:1663–1682
Körner A, Berndt J, Stumvoll M, Kiess W, Kovacs P (2007) TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms confer an increased risk for early impairment of glucose metabolism and increased height in obese children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1956–1960
Weijnen CF, Rich SS, Meigs JB, Krolewski AS, Warram JH (2002) Risk of diabetes in siblings of index cases with type 2 diabetes: implications for genetic studies. Diabet Med 19:41–50
Mitchell BD, Kammerer CM, Reinhart LJ, Stern MP (1994) NIDDM in Mexican-American families. Heterogeneity by age of onset. Diabetes Care 17:567–573
Frayling TM, Wiltshire S, Hitman GA et al (2003) Young-onset type 2 diabetes families are the major contributors to genetic loci in the Diabetes UK Warren 2 genome scan and identify putative novel loci on chromosomes 8q21, 21q22, and 22q11. Diabetes 52:1857–1863
Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium, Kathiresan S, Voight BF et al (2009) Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants. Nat Genet 41:334–341
Almind K, Bjørbaek C, Vestergaard H, Hansen T, Echwald S, Pedersen O (1993) Amino acid polymorphisms of insulin receptor substrate-1 in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 342:828–832
Hager J, Zouali H, Velho G, Froguel P (1993) Insulin receptor substrate (IRS-1) gene polymorphisms in French NIDDM families. Lancet 342:1430
Imai Y, Fusco A, Suzuki Y et al (1994) Variant sequences of insulin receptor substrate-1 in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1655–1658
Shimokawa K, Kadowaki H, Sakura H et al (1994) Molecular scanning of the glycogen synthase and insulin receptor substrate-1 genes in Japanese subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 202:463–469
Hitman GA, Hawrami K, McCarthy MI et al (1995) Insulin receptor substrate-1 gene mutations in NIDDM; implications for the study of polygenic disease. Diabetologia 38:481–486
Mori H, Hashiramoto M, Kishimoto M, Kasuga M (1995) Amino acid polymorphisms of the insulin receptor substrate-1 in Japanese noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2822–2826
Chuang LM, Lai CS, Yeh JI, Wu HP, Tai TY, Lin BJ (1996) No association between the Gly971Arg variant of the insulin receptor substrate 1 gene and NIDDM in the Taiwanese population. Diabetes Care 19:446–449
Ura S, Araki E, Kishikawa H et al (1996) Molecular scanning of the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) gene in Japanese patients with NIDDM: identification of five novel polymorphisms. Diabetologia 39:600–608
Zhang Y, Stratton IM, Warren-Perry MG, Orho M, Groop L, Turner RC (1996) UKPDS 19: heterogeneity in NIDDM: separate contributions of IRS-1 and beta3-adrenergic-receptor mutations to insulin resistance and obesity respectively with no evidence for glycogen synthase gene mutations. Diabetologia 39:1505–1511
Panz VR, Raal FJ, O’Rahilly S, Kedda MA, Joffe BI (1997) Insulin receptor substrate-1 gene variants in lipoatrophic diabetes mellitus and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a study of South African black and white subjects. Hum Genet 101:118–119
Lepretre F, Vionnet N, Budhan S et al (1998) Genetic studies of polymorphisms in ten non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus candidate genes in Tamil Indians from Pondicherry. Diabetes Metab 24:244–250
Yamada K, Yuan X, Ishiyama S et al (1998) Codon 972 polymorphism of the insulin receptor substrate-1 gene in impaired glucose tolerance and late-onset NIDDM. Diabetes Care 21:753–756
Ito K, Katsuki A, Furuta M et al (1999) Insulin sensitivity is not affected by mutation of codon 972 of the human IRS-1 gene. Horm Res 52:230–234
Hart LM, Stolk RP, Dekker JM et al (1999) Prevalence of variants in candidate genes for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands: the Rotterdam study and the Hoorn study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1002–1006
Lei HH, Coresh J, Shuldiner AR, Boerwinkle E, Brancati FL (1999) Variants of the insulin receptor substrate-1 and fatty acid binding protein 2 genes and the risk of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and hyperinsulinemia in African-Americans: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes 48:1868–1872
Celi FS, Negri C, Tanner K et al (2000) Molecular scanning for mutations in the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) gene in Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 16:370–377
Rosskopf D, Frey U, Eckhardt S et al (2000) Interaction of the G protein beta 3 subunit T825 allele and the IRS-1 Arg972 variant in type 2 diabetes. Eur J Med Res 5:484–490
Orkunoglu Suer FE, Mergen H, Bolu E, Ozata M (2005) Molecular scanning for mutations in the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) gene in Turkish with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr J 52:593–598
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2007 to S. Prudente and 2009 to S. Prudente and V. Trischitta) and by the NIH (grants HL073168, DK055523 and DK036836 to A. Doria and the Genetics Core of the Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center at the Joslin Diabetes Center).
Duality of interest
The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM Table 1
Characteristics of all case-control studies available (PDF 81.5 kb)
ESM 1
(PDF 26.0 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morini, E., Prudente, S., Succurro, E. et al. IRS1 G972R polymorphism and type 2 diabetes: a paradigm for the difficult ascertainment of the contribution to disease susceptibility of ‘low-frequency–low-risk’ variants. Diabetologia 52, 1852–1857 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1426-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1426-4