Abstract
Key message
Twelve meta-QTL for seed Fe and Zn concentration and/or content were identified from 87 QTL originating from seven population grown in sixteen field trials. These meta-QTL include 2 specific to iron, 2 specific to zinc and 8 that co-localize for iron and zinc concentrations and/or content.
Abstract
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important legume for human consumption worldwide and it is an important source of microelements, especially iron and zinc. Bean biofortification breeding programs develop new varieties with high levels of Fe and Zn targeted for countries with human micronutrient deficiencies. Biofortification efforts thus far have relied on phenotypic selection of raw seed mineral concentrations in advanced generations. While numerous quantitative trait loci (QTL) studies have been conducted to identify genomic regions associated with increased Fe and Zn concentration in seeds, these results have yet to be employed for marker-assisted breeding. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis from seven QTL studies in Andean and Middle American intra- and inter-gene pool populations to identify the regions in the genome that control the Fe and Zn levels in seeds. Two meta-QTL specific to Fe and two meta-QTL specific to Zn were identified. Additionally, eight Meta QTL that co-localized for Fe and Zn concentration and/or content were identified across seven chromosomes. The Fe and Zn shared meta-QTL could be useful candidates for marker-assisted breeding to simultaneously increase seed Fe and Zn. The physical positions for 12 individual meta-QTL were identified and within five of the meta-QTL, candidate genes were identified from six gene families that have been associated with transport of iron and zinc in plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important grain legume among the twenty that are commonly consumed in human diets (Joshi and Rao 2017; McClean et al. 2004). Common bean is a diverse crop in terms of morphological and seed variability, cultivation methods, environmental adaptation and consumer preferences and these factors have made it suitable for many different niches (Broughton et al. 2003). Phaseolus vulgaris was reported to have been domesticated independently twice—in Mexico and the Andes (Peru, Colombia) (Bitocchi et al. 2013). Members of the two gene pools, Andean and Middle American, vary in seed size, seed nutritional quality, resistance to pathogens, yield, days to maturity, and other morpho-agronomic traits (Pérez-Vega et al. 2010; Blair et al. 2010a).
Dry bean is an important dietary source of iron and zinc (Bouis and Welch 2010; Carrasco-Castilla et al. 2012). It has been included as a target crop in biofortification programs for countries with widespread human nutritional deficiencies. Microelement deficiencies are among the most common and devastating global nutritional problems (Hirschi 2009). In terms of seed micronutrient concentrations, bean germplasm from the Andean and Middle American gene pools show some variability, Blair et al. (2010a) reported that Andean gene pool and inter-gene pool crosses tend to have higher concentrations of minerals than Middle American beans. The natural variability for seed Fe and Zn has been utilized in breeding programs based on phenotypic selection for seed mineral concentrations (Blair et al. 2010b). However, phenotypic selections alone are not leading to the genetic gains needed to make biofortification successful (Vasconcelos et al. 2017). Genomic tools are needed to help breeders to reach target concentrations in dry beans.
One of the most common strategies to unravel quantitative traits are Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) studies. Several QTL analyses have been conducted in common bean to identify regions associated with seed Fe and Zn levels (Guzman-Maldonado et al. 2003; Cichy et al. 2009; Blair et al. 2010d; Blair et al. 2011, 2013; Blair and Izquierdo 2012). The use of common markers across different maps makes it possible to integrate such QTL in order to improve the accuracy of positioning and decrease the confidence interval using meta-QTL analysis.
Meta-QTL analysis compiles information from multiple studies and improves QTL location by comparing individual experiments and narrowing down confidence intervals obtained from individual analyses (Goffinet and Gerber 2000). Meta-QTL analysis has been conducted in several crops for various traits, including grain size and resistance to African gall midge in rice (Daware et al. 2017; Wu et al. 2016; Yao et al. 2016), grain traits in wheat (Tyagi et al. 2015), oil and protein in soybean (Van and McHale 2017) and resistance to white mold in common bean (Vasconcellos et al. 2017). Various statistical methods have been developed for meta-QTL analysis. The software program Biomercator uses the transformed Akaike classification criterion (AIC) to determine the real number of QTL in a specific region (Arcade et al. 2004). To date, only one meta-QTL study for seed Fe and Zn has been published. That study was conducted with five maize populations and it resulted in the discovery of ten meta-QTL involved in Fe and/or Zn accumulation. The phenotypic variation contributed to the 10 MQTL ranged from 9 to 28% (Jin et al. 2013). Genomic advances have led to the identification of several key nutrient-regulation-related genes relevant to biofortification (Carvalho and Vasconcelos 2013). The accumulation of Fe and Zn in seeds is determined through several mechanisms. Gene families involved in root mineral uptake include ZIP (Zinc/Iron-regulated transporter-related protein), ZIF (zinc-induced facilitator), HMA (heavy metal associated), FRO (ferric reductase oxidase), and NA (nicotianamine) (Haydon and Cobbett 2007; Curie et al. 2009; Haydon et al. 2012). Shoot transport gene families include ZIP, FRO, NA and MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion) (Vert et al. 2002; Wintz et al. 2003; Bashir et al. 2006; Ishimaru et al. 2005, 2011, 2012) and seed filling genes include HMA and NRAMP (Natural Resistance Associated Macrophage Protein) (Connorton et al. 2017a; Mary et al. 2015; Carvalho and Vasconcelos 2013; López-Millán et al. 2016). Genes in the NA, IRT (iron-regulated transporter), VIT (vacuolar iron transporter) and ferritin families have been used to increase the concentration of Fe and/or Zn in grain of wheat and rice (Borg et al. 2012; Moreno-Moyano et al. 2016; Connorton et al. 2017b; Singh et al. 2017).
In this study, individual genetic maps and QTL for seed Fe and Zn concentration and content from seven populations were used to develop a consensus map and to identify Fe and Zn meta-QTL. These meta-QTL narrowed down confidence intervals of initial individual analysis’ and the physical regions of the meta-QTL were identified. Furthermore, candidate genes within the meta-QTL intervals that belong to families of genes that have been reported in the literature in the process of uptake, transport and/or remobilization of Fe and Zn were selected.
Materials and methods
Populations
QTL information related to Fe and Zn in common bean seed was collected for seven populations, five of which have been previously published. We have summarized the details in Table 1. The seven populations include two Andean (AND 696 × G19833 (AG), G21242 × G21078 (GG2)), two Middle American (G14519 × G4825 (GG1), Black Magic × Shiny Crow (BS)), and three inter-gene pool (DOR 364 × G19833 (DG), BAT 93 × Jalo EEP (BJ), Cerinza × G10022 (CG)) populations of common bean. Additional description of field trials, statistical analysis, and molecular markers for the published studies have been previously reported in detail (Blair et al. 2009; Cichy et al. 2009, Blair et al. 2010c, 2011, 2013; Blair and Izquierdo 2012). The description of field trials and the map development for BS has been previously reported (Cichy et al. 2014).
Phenotypic data
The seven populations were planted in multiple years, environments, and locations. The GG1 and GG2 populations were planted in three locations in Colombia: Darien, Palmira and Popayan. DG was planted in Popayan and Darien and CG in Palmira and Darien. The AG population was planted in Darien under high and low soil P treatments. The BS population was planted in Michigan, USA and the BJ population in Darien, Colombia (Table 2).
Two methods of mineral analysis were implemented in the studies, Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP) and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) as described in (Blair et al. 2009). AAS was used to quantify minerals in the AG population and ICP was used in the BS population. The other studies used both methodologies AAS and ICP to quantify Fe and Zn. All seven populations have data for seed Fe and Zn concentration. In addition, the CG and GG1 populations have data for seed Fe and Zn content (i.e., µg/seed), DG and CG have data for seed Fe and Zn concentration in cotyledon tissue, and CG also has seed coat Fe and Zn concentration data.
The DG data on Fe and Zn concentration in cotyledon have not been published previously. Cotyledon concentration measurements were conducted as described by Blair et al. (2013) where 12 g of seed was washed with sterile water and peeled by hand using a sterile scalpel to remove the seed coat from the cotyledons. The cotyledon samples were dried before grinding. Dry cotyledon tissue powder was weighed into two replicates of ∼ 0.25 g each and was analyzed separately for Fe and Zn concentration via AAS and ICP and the values of the replicates were averaged.
Correlations between seed Fe- and Zn-related phenotypes were determined using with Pearson correlations using SAS software, v 9.3 (SAS-Institute 2011).
QTL analysis
The seven populations range in size from 77 lines in AG to 138 lines in CG. The number of markers ranges from 114 in GG1 to 681 in BS. Eighty-eight QTL for seed Fe and Zn concentration and/or content have been reported for the populations AG, CG, DG, GG1, and GG2 (Blair et al. 2009, 2010c, 2011, 2013; Cichy et al. 2009; Blair and Izquierdo 2012). While the DG QTL study reported previously found 26 QTL for seed Fe and Zn concentration (Blair et al. 2009), the QTL data we present here are based on a reanalysis of the phenotypic data with a saturated genetic map of this population that became available following the publication of the original DG QTL study (Galeano et al. 2011). This new map provided high resolution for QTL detection, and for that reason we repeated the QTL analysis with the new genetic map. We conducted a new QTL analysis for the BS and BJ populations via composite interval mapping (CIM). This is a new analysis that has not been previously published. The QTL analysis was carried out using the program Windows QTL cartographer version 2.5 (Wang et al. 2012). To identify an accurate significance threshold for each trait, an empirical threshold was determined using 1000 permutations (Churchill and Doerge 1994).
Map projection and meta-analysis
In total, data from 87 QTL were used for analysis (Table 1, Tables S1). In the population AG, all published QTL were used for meta-analysis except the QTL reported on chromosome 11. In AG chromosome 11 is composed of 15 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), 1 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and 1 simple sequence repeat (SSR). Due to the lack of sequence information for these markers, it was not possible to use these QTL in the meta-analysis.
The program Biomercator v3.0 (Arcade et al. 2004) was used to develop a consensus map and for subsequent meta-QTL analysis. The DG map was chosen as the anchor for the consensus map since it has a high marker density, including 499 molecular markers of which 462 are SSR or SNPs that have information about their physical position (Galeano et al. 2011). The other six populations were projected onto the DG map to integrate the seven populations into the consensus map. Six of the seven maps share common markers, the exception is that of the BS population which is composed of 681 SNPs (Cichy et al. 2014). The BS population was integrated in the analysis using the physical position of SSR and SNPs of the DG map in the P. vulgaris v.2.1 reference genome available in Phytozome v12 (Goodstein et al. 2012). The DG SSR sequences were obtained from Phaseolus genes website at http://phaseolusgenes.bioinformatics.ucdavis.edu. Using the DG SSRs and SNPs and BS SNPs physical positions, we made a bridge between both genetic maps, taking into account the distance in cM estimated by Schmutz et al. 2014. Positions of Fe and Zn concentration and content QTL were extrapolated onto the consensus map on the basis of common genetic marker positions. Co-localization of meta-QTL was determined by the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) (Akaike 1974), and the lowest value was considered the best fit model for meta-QTL prediction.
Candidate genes
The search for candidate genes was performed based on the physical positions of the meta-QTL regions. The most recent annotated version of the P. vulgaris reference genome v.2.1 in Phytozome was used to identify the physical position of the meta-QTL and genes contained in these regions (Goodstein et al. 2012). The candidate genes were selected on the basis of a literature review of genes that have been reported as having a role in root uptake, transport and accumulation of Fe and Zn in plants (Vert et al. 2002; Wintz et al. 2003; Ishimaru et al. 2005, 2011, 2012; Bashir et al. 2006; Haydon and Cobbett 2007; Curie et al. 2009; Borg et al. 2012; Haydon et al. 2012; Carvalho and Vasconcelos 2013; Mary et al. 2015; López-Millán et al. 2016; Moreno-Moyano et al. 2016; Connorton et al. 2017a, b; Singh et al. 2017). In the case of the bZIP family, this is a large gene family but only two genes of that family have been reported to be involved in plant mineral uptake and translocation in Arabidopsis (Assuncao et al. 2010); the protein sequences of those two transcription factors were aligned to the P. vulgaris reference genome v.2.1 using BLASTP in NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Results
Single population QTL analysis
This study combines 87 QTL for seed Fe and Zn concentration and content, including 39 for Fe and 48 for Zn across seven common bean populations. It includes 56 QTL collated from previous studies within the AG, CG, GG1, and GG2 populations (Table S2). Additionally, 31 previously unreported QTL were identified with CIM analysis in the BJ, BS and DG populations (Table 1). Among the QTL identified with CIM, three were identified for Fe seed cotyledon and one for Zn seed cotyledon concentration found in DG population. The QTL for cotyledon Fe are on chromosomes Pv02, Pv08 and Pv11, while the QTL for cotyledon Zn is on chromosome Pv11. The other 27 QTL of populations BJ, BS and DG include 11 QTL for seed Fe and 16 QTL for seed Zn concentration. The seed Fe/Zn concentration QTL are distributed on chromosomes Pv01, Pv02, Pv03, Pv04, Pv05, Pv06, Pv08, Pv09 and Pv11. R2 values for Fe concentration QTL ranged from 0.08 on chromosome Pv03 to 0.27 on chromosome Pv11, and R2 values for Zn concentration QTL ranged from 0.09 on chromosome Pv02 to 0.27 on chromosome Pv04 (Table S1).
Phenotypic values for seed Fe concentration ranged from 28 to 114 ppm and for seed zinc concentration from 16 to 57 ppm (Table 2). Seed Fe and Zn concentration were positively correlated across the seven populations and the average of those correlations was r = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.50 for the Andean (AG, GG2), Middle American (GG1, BS) and inter-gene pool crosses (DG, BJ, CG), respectively. The average correlation between Fe and Zn concentration on the seven populations was 0.59.
Chromosomes Pv01 and Pv06 contained the highest number of QTL while Pv10 was the only chromosome without a single QTL identified (Table S1). Individual QTL explained between 4 and 55% of the phenotypic variance. In total, 25 QTL had R2 values greater than 20%, and, therefore, are considered major QTL. All QTL detected on Pv06 and Pv09 were detected only in intra-gene pool populations, whereas the remaining chromosomes (Pv01 through Pv05, Pv08, and Pv11) contained QTL from both intra- and inter-gene pool populations. Fifty-five percent of QTL had an Andean source while the other forty-five percent had Middle American sources. Pv02 had the most consistently detected QTL, such that QTL were detected in the same region in five out of the seven populations.
Consensus mapping
The DG genetic map was used as a reference to develop the consensus map. The DG map is highly saturated and, with the exception of the BS population, it had markers in common with all maps that were integrated into this study. The consensus map consists of 1038 markers with a total length of 2012 cM and an average distance between markers of 3.6 cM. Of the 87 QTL that were identified in the 7 populations, 72 were projected on the consensus genetic map (Table S3). The remaining 15 QTL that were not projected were in regions that did not have sufficient common markers to make a reliable projection on the consensus map. For consensus QTL projection, the chromosomal position, LOD score, and R2 of the individual QTL were taken into consideration. Chromosome Pv06 had the highest number of consensus QTL (18 QTL) and Pv02 contained the highest number of QTL that came from different populations (5 populations) (Fig. 1). The order of each chromosome was estimated with the physical position of SSR and SNP markers in the P. vulgaris reference genome v.2.1.
Meta-QTL analysis
The meta-analysis of the 72 QTL projected in the consensus map was performed in Biomercator 3.0; the AIC was used to select the best QTL model on each chromosome (Table 3). The meta-analysis resulted in a genetic model with 12 meta-QTL that covered 47 of the 72 individual QTL from the seven populations (Fig. 2 and Table S4). The number of meta-QTL identified on each chromosome varied from one on chromosomes Pv01, Pv04, Pv09 and Pv11, and two on chromosomes Pv02, Pv06, Pv07 and Pv08. The mean R2 of the MQTL ranged from 10.3 to 27.0%, while the 95% confidence intervals for the MQTL varied between 3.1 and 18.1 cM, with an average of 7.6 cM. The CI was narrower in all MQTL than the mean CI identified for the original QTL. The physical length of MQTL varied from 0.36 to 11.93 Mb. MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.1 and MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.2 contained the highest number of individual QTL, each one with 8 QTL. MQTL_Fe&Zn_11.1 contained QTL from three different inter-gene pool populations.
Three types of MQTL were identified: 1) Fe-MQTL, 2) Zn-MQTL, and 3) Fe & Zn-MQTL. Fe-MQTL included MQTL_Fe_7.2 and MQTL_Fe_8.1. MQTL_Fe_7.2 and MQTL_Fe_8.1 have two individual QTL each that come from two different populations, in the case of MQTL_Fe_7.2 the source in GG2 was the Andean line G21078 and for GG1 was the Middle America genotype G4825. Similarly, the sources of MQTL_Fe_8.1 came from both the Andean (Cerinza) and Middle American (Black Magic) gene pools. Zn-MQTL are distributed on chromosomes Pv02 and Pv07. MQTL_Zn_2.2 includes QTL from two inter-gene pool populations (BJ and DG). The source of the BJ-QTL the source is the Middle American line BAT93 and in the DG-QTL the source is the Middle American DOR364. MQTL_Zn_7.1 is specific to CG and included two QTL that were identified in the CG cross between an Andean line and a Mexican wild genotype. One of these QTL is for seed Zn content with as source the wild genotype G10022, while the other QTL is for seed coat Zn content, with as source the Andean line Cerinza. The last group is the Fe & Zn-MQTL; this is the most abundant group with eight MQTL across seven chromosomes. MQTL_Fe&Zn_1.1 and MQTL_Fe&Zn_8.2 have Andean sources, MQTL_Fe&Zn_4.1 has Middle American sources and MQTL_Fe&Zn_2.1, MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.1, MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.2, MQTL_Fe&Zn_9.1 and MQTL_Fe&Zn_11.1 have both gene pools as sources of favorable alleles for Fe and Zn concentration/content in seed. The individual Fe and Zn contribution to the shared meta-QTL is available in Table S5.
Candidate genes
In total, 12 candidate genes were identified related to mineral transport or storage. These were found within 5 of the 12 MQTL regions (Table 4). The gene families identified in the MQTL have been previously reported to function in various points in Fe and Zn acquisition, including 1) Root uptake (ZIP, FRO and NA), 2) Translocation within the plant (ZIP, FRO, NA and MATE), and 3) Storage in seed (NRAMP). The name, position and family of each of the 15 candidate genes are reported in Table 4.
ZIP family: In both MQTL_Fe&Zn_9.1 and MQTL_Fe&Zn_11.1, there is a single ZIP family gene. Members of this family participate in mineral uptake, transport to leaves and translocation to seeds, embryo, endosperm, and seed coat (Vert et al. 2002; Ishimaru et al. 2005). The ZIP genes in MQTL_Fe&Zn_9.1 and MQTL_Fe&Zn_11.1 have both been annotated in the reference genome as zinc/iron transporters (Goodstein et al. 2012). In addition, a bZIP transcription factor was found in MQTL_Fe&Zn_11.1. bZIP transcription factors are associated with genes of the ZIP family and play a role in the uptake of minerals in plants (Assuncao et al. 2010). Although there are other bZIP elements in the MQTL, bZIP Phvul.011G035700 is the only one that aligned at the protein level with the transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 (e value of 4 e-120 and 5 e-116, respectively) that have an important function in Zn uptake capacity in Arabidopsis (Assuncao et al. 2010).
FRO family: Three FRO genes were identified within MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.1. FRO genes have important roles in iron uptake and in its transport in the vascular system (Wu et al. 2005; Kim and Guerinot 2007). Furthermore, other members of this family play an important role in chloroplast iron acquisition (Jeong et al. 2008).
NA family: MQTL_Fe&Zn_1.1 contains an NA family gene. NA genes have been related with mechanisms to acquire Fe and other minerals from the soil (Waters et al. 2006). NA chelates metal cations (Masuda et al. 2009) and there is evidence that suggests the NA family plays a role in the internal transport of Fe, Zn and other metals in plants (Takahashi et al. 2003; Schuler et al. 2012; Singh et al. 2017).
MATE family: Members of the MATE family are involved in the efflux of molecules from the cytoplasm to the outside of the cell or into the vacuole, and it is likely that these genes products export an Fe chelator that allows the movement of Fe in the plant (Grotz and Guerinot 2006; Rogers et al. 2009). One MATE gene was found in MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.1, and two genes were located in MQTL_Fe&Zn_4.1.
NRAMP family: NRAMP Genes are involved in transport of metals out of vacuoles. In Arabidopsis, members of this family are required for iron mobilization in germinating seeds (Thomine et al. 2003; Lanquar et al. 2010; Gollhofer et al. 2014; Mary et al. 2015). NRAMP genes were located in MQTL_Fe&Zn_1.1 and MQTL_Fe&Zn_9.1.
Discussion
Micronutrient deficiencies are widespread nutritional disorders affecting billions of people around the world (Nestel et al. 2006; Zhao et al. 2009; Vasconcellos et al. 2017). To date biofortification programs have increased Fe and Zn content in several crops; however, more efforts are still needed for at risk human populations to reach the recommended dietary requirements (Vasconcelos et al. 2017). Additional progress can be made through molecular breeding. Next-generation sequencing information has allowed genome sequencing of the most important crops to human consumption. There has also been progress in identifying genes that are involved in the movement of Fe and Zn in plants and using these genes for biofortification of rice (Goto et al. 1999), cassava (Ihemere 2012), wheat (Borg et al. 2012), maize (Kanobe et al. 2013), lettuce (Goto et al. 2000) and soybean (Vasconcelos et al. 2014).
Seed Fe and Zn concentrations are quantitative traits with wide genotypic variability. As was reported by Beebe et al. (2001) and Blair et al. (2008), there is a difference in Fe and Zn concentration between the gene pools. Andean genotypes tend to have higher Fe but lower Zn than genotypes from the Middle American gene pool. Another important factor in the analysis of seed Fe and Zn concentration in common bean is the genotype–environmental interaction (GxE) (De Araújo et al. 2003; Pereira et al. 2014). Beebe (2012) and Hossain et al. (2013) reported that environmental factors such as soil characteristics and precipitation have an important influence in mineral accumulation in common bean.
To unravel the genetic complexity of seed Fe and Zn concentration and content, we collected data from seven populations over four locations, 9 years, and with multiple methodologies being used for mineral quantification, including whole seed, cotyledon, and seed coat measurements. The seed mineral data from the seven populations were positively correlated among locations, years and traits (Fe–Zn). The average correlation between Fe and Zn concentration in the seven populations was 59%. The correlation between Fe and Zn supports the well-reported observation that these traits are linked and if we increase the concentration of one of them, we will increase the other as well (Blair et al. 2010b; Blair and Izquierdo 2012). The correlation may be related to the similar movement of Fe and Zn through the plant, ultimately to the seed. Many of the same genes are involved in both Fe and Zn transport (Kim and Guerinot 2007; Bashir et al. 2013). The positive correlation between seed Fe and Zn concentrations has been reported in other crops as well, including chickpea (Diapari et al. 2014; Upadhyaya et al. 2016).
In this study, we used seven populations that involve the two major gene pools of common bean. We included four intra- and three inter-gene pool crosses. In total, we tested 87 individual QTL detected in seven populations and were able to project 72 in the consensus map (41 have an Andean source, 25 have a Middle American source, and 6 have a wild Middle American source). The 72 QTL projected were distributed across all chromosomes except Pv10. The numerous QTL reflect the genetic complexity of the accumulation of Fe and Zn in common bean seeds.
The consensus map generated from the seven maps has a size of 2012 cM with 12 MQTL including two MQTL for Fe, two for Zn and 8 MQTL co-localized for Fe and Zn. It is interesting that of the nine QTL projected in the consensus map from the BS population, all but two clustered with QTL of other populations. All populations used in this study were planted in Colombia except the BS that was planted in Richville, MI–US, and although the environmental conditions are different (e.g., soil type, PH, average yearly rainfall), the BS-QTL are mainly close to the QTL of the other populations that have a Middle American genotype as a source. The proximity of BS-QTL with the Middle America QTL suggests that although there is a GxE interaction (De Araújo et al. 2003; Beebe 2012; Hossain et al. 2013 and Pereira et al. 2014) in the accumulation of Fe and Zn, the gene pool origin has an important effect in the accumulation of these minerals in the seed of common bean.
In this study, we narrowed down the CI in all 12 MQTL regions that allowed us to identify 12 candidate genes that could be responsible for some of the differences in the seed Fe and Zn concentration/content in the populations included in this study. Out of the 12 MQTL, the 8 Fe–Zn shared MQTL distributed over chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 have major potential for molecular breeding because they are associated with both Fe and Zn concentration and/or content and could potentially be used to increase the content of both elements in common bean seed. In five of these eight meta-QTL, there are 12 candidates for validation and subsequent application of allelic variation in breeding, e.g., by use of genetic transformation or allele screening in germplasm collections (ecoTilling). The genes Phvul.006G030500, Phvul.006G030550 and Phvul.006G030600 of the FRO family in MQTL_Fe&Zn_6.1 are of special interest, because genes of this family have been used successfully to increase mineral concentration in rice, wheat, and soybean (Goto et al. 1999; Borg et al. 2012; Vasconcelos et al. 2014). FRO genes are responsible for reducing iron at the root surface (Wu et al. 2005; Mukherjee et al. 2006). Dicots acidify the rhizosphere to acquire Fe from the soil. The roots release organic acids and phenolic compounds to increase Fe3+ concentrations in the soil solution. These compounds chelate Fe3+ which subsequently is reduced to Fe2+ in the plasma membrane of root epidermal cells by ferric reductases which are encoded by members of the FRO gene family (Wu et al. 2005; Mukherjee et al. 2006; Connolly and Guerinot 2002; Kobayashi and Nishizawa 2012). We identified twelve candidate genes with the information available in the literature of the better-known gene families that have a relationship in the process to uptake, transport, and accumulation of Fe and Zn in plants. For the above, it is possible that we missed reporting some genes that belong to families that do not have a well-reported role in the movement of minerals in plants or genes that belong to families with unknown function.
Quantitative traits are a challenge in plant breeding due to the genetic complexity that governs these traits and the difficulty of stacking numerous alleles that control them. Meta-QTL analysis made possible the consolidation of 47 single QTL into 12 meta-QTL. These results showed a greater consolidation than a maize meta-QTL analysis for grain Fe and Zn, where 28 single QTL were consolidated into 10 meta-QTL (Jin et al. 2013). While we show that there are at least 12 regions that control the seed concentration/content of Fe and Zn in the common bean genome, the eight regions that associate with both Fe and Zn are most promising for focus in future studies. The stacking of eight independent regions in a single breeding line is challenging as there is a probability of one in 256 to stack the eight regions with the favorable alleles. The MQTL identified in this study have three potential uses, the first one is to generate markers for marker-assisted selection (MAS) for gene stacking breeding lines, the second way is the validation and subsequent use of the genes identified in this study in bean genetic transformation or eco-Tilling programs, and the last and perhaps most promising is the use of the MQTL regions in Genomic Selection (GS) models to increase the models accuracy in their use in bean breeding programs. Although this is a new study field, Spindel et al. (2016) reported promising results in rice using the regions identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as fixed effects in GS models.
Author contribution statement
PI and CA collected and analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. AIM collected data and wrote manuscript. MB and BR contributed data and reviewed the manuscript. KAC designed experiments and wrote and edited the manuscript.
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723
Arcade A, Labourdette A, Falque M, Mangin B, Chardon F, Charcosset A, Joets J (2004) BioMercator: integrating genetic maps and QTL towards discovery of candidate genes. Bioinformatics 20:2324–2326
Assuncao AGL, Herrero E, Lin Y-F, Huettel B, Talukdar S, Smaczniak C, Immink RGH, van Eldik M, Fiers M, Schat H et al (2010) Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 regulate the adaptation to zinc deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:10296–10301
Bashir K, Inoue H, Nagasaka S, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2006) Cloning and characterization of deoxymugineic acid synthase genes from graminaceous plants. J Biol Chem 281:32395–32402
Bashir K, Nozoye T, Ishimaru Y, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK (2013) Exploiting new tools for iron bio-fortification of rice. Biotechnol Adv 31:1624–1633
Beebe S (2012) Common bean breeding in the tropics. Plant Breed Rev 36:357–426
Beebe S, Rengifo J, Gaitan E, Duque MC, Tohme J (2001) Diversity and origin of andean landraces of common bean. Crops 862:854–862
Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Giardini A, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Santilocchi R, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gioia T, Logozzo G et al (2013) Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Mesoamerica and the Andes. New Phytol 197:300–313
Blair MW, Izquierdo P (2012) Use of the advanced backcross-QTL method to transfer seed mineral accumulation nutrition traits from wild to Andean cultivated common beans. Theor Appl Genet 125:1015–1031
Blair MW, Buendía HF, Giraldo MC, Métais I, Peltier D (2008) Characterization of AT-rich microsatellites in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 118:91–103
Blair MW, Astudillo C, Grusak MA, Graham R, Beebe SE (2009) Inheritance of seed iron and zinc concentrations in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Mol Breed 23:197–207
Blair MW, Sharon JBK, Carolina A, Chee-Ming L, Andrea F, Grusak MA (2010a) Variation and inheritance of iron reductase activity in the roots of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and association with seed iron accumulation QTL. BMC Plant Biol 10:215
Blair MW, González LF, Kimani PM, Butare L (2010b) Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa. Theor Appl Genet 121:237–248
Blair MW, Medina JI, Astudillo C, Rengifo J, Beebe SE, Machado G, Graham R (2010c) QTL for seed iron and zinc concentration and content in a Mesoamerican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) population. Theor Appl Genet 121:1059–1070
Blair MW, Monserrate F, Beebe S, Restrepo J, Flores J (2010d) Registration of high mineral common bean germplasm lines NUA35 and NUA56 from the red-mottled seed class. J Plant Regist 4:55
Blair MW, Astudillo C, Rengifo J, Beebe SE, Graham R (2011) QTL analyses for seed iron and zinc concentrations in an intra-genepool population of Andean common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 122:511–521
Blair MW, Izquierdo P, Astudillo C, Grusak MA (2013) A legume biofortification quandary: variability and genetic control of seed coat micronutrient accumulation in common beans. Front Plant Sci 4:275
Borg S, Brinch-Pedersen H, Tauris B, Madsen LH, Darbani B, Noeparvar S, Holm PB (2012) Wheat ferritins: improving the iron content of the wheat grain. J Cereal Sci 56:204–213
Bouis HE, Welch RM (2010) Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci 50:S-20–S-32
Broughton WJ, Hern G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.)—model food legumes. Plant Soil 252:55–128
Carrasco-Castilla J, Hernández-Álvarez AJ, Jiménez-Martínez C, Jacinto-Hernández C, Alaiz M, Girón-Calle J, Vioque J, Dávila-Ortiz G (2012) Antioxidant and metal chelating activities of peptide fractions from phaseolin and bean protein hydrolysates. Food Chem 135:1789–1795
Carvalho SMP, Vasconcelos MW (2013) Producing more with less: strategies and novel technologies for plant-based food biofortification. Food Res Int 54:961–971
Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971
Cichy KA, Caldas GV, Snapp SS, Blair MW (2009) QTL analysis of seed iron, zinc, and phosphorus levels in an andean bean population. Crop Sci 49:1742–1750
Cichy KA, Fernandez A, Kilian A, Kelly JD, Galeano CH, Shaw S, Brick M, Hodkinson D, Troxtell E (2014) QTL analysis of canning quality and color retention in black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Mol Breed 33:139–154
Connolly EL, Guerinot M (2002) Iron stress in plants. Genome Biol 3:1024.1–1024.4
Connorton JM, Balk J, Rodríguez-Celma J (2017a) Iron homeostasis in plants—a brief overview. Metallomics 9:813–823
Connorton JM, Jones ER, Rodríguez-Ramiro I, Fairweather-Tait S, Uauy C, Balk J (2017b) Wheat vacuolar iron transporter TaVIT2 transports Fe and Mn and is effective for biofortification. Plant Physiol 174:2434–2444
Curie C, Cassin G, Couch D, Divol F, Higuchi K, Le Jean M, Misson J, Schikora A, Czernic P, Mari S (2009) Metal movement within the plant: contribution of nicotianamine and yellow stripe 1-like transporters. Ann Bot 103:1–11
Daware AV, Srivastava R, Singh AK, Parida SK, Tyagi AK (2017) Regional association analysis of MetaQTL delineates candidate grain size genes in rice. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00807
De Araújo R, Miglioranza É, Montalvan R, Destro D, Celeste M (2003) Genotype x environment interaction effects on the iron content of common bean grains. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 3:269–273
Diapari A, Bett K, Deokar A, Warkentin TD, Tar’an BM (2014) Genetic diversity and association mapping of iron and zinc concentrations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Genome 57:459–468
Freyre RO, Tsai SM, Gilbertson RL, Gepts P (1998) Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean 4. Development of an RFLP-based linkage map. Theor Appl Genet 85:513–520
Galeano CH, Fernandez AC, Franco-Herrera N, Cichy KA, McClean PE, Vanderleyden J, Blair MW (2011) Saturation of an intra-gene pool linkage map: towards a unified consensus linkage map for fine mapping and synteny analysis in common bean. PLoS ONE 6:e28135
Goffinet B, Gerber S (2000) Quantitative trait loci: a meta-analysis. Genetics 155:463–473
Gollhofer J, Timofeev R, Lan P, Schmidt W, Buckhout TJ (2014) Vacuolar-iron-transporter1-like proteins mediate iron homeostasis in arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 9:1–8
Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, Mitros T, Dirks W, Hellsten U, Putnam N et al (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D1178–D1186
Goto F, Yoshihara T, Shigemoto N, Toki S, Takaiwa F (1999) Iron fortification of rice seed by the soybean ferritin gene. Nat Biotechnol 17:282–286
Goto F, Yoshihara T, Saiki H (2000) Iron accumulation and enhanced growth in transgenic lettuce plants expressing the iron- binding protein ferritin. TAG Theor Appl Genet 100:658–664
Grotz N, Guerinot ML (2006) Molecular aspects of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763:595–608
Guzman-Maldonado SH, Martinez O, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Guevara-Lara F, Paredes-Lopez O (2003) Putative quantitative trait loci for physical and chemical components of common bean. Crop Sci 43:1029–1035
Haydon MJ, Cobbett CS (2007) A novel major facilitator superfamily protein at the tonoplast influences zinc tolerance and accumulation in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143:1705–1719
Haydon MJ, Kawachi M, Wirtz M, Hillmer S, Hell R, Kramer U (2012) Vacuolar nicotianamine has critical and distinct roles under iron deficiency and for zinc sequestration in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 24:724–737
Hirschi KD (2009) Nutrient biofortification of food crops. Annu Rev Nutr 29:401–421
Hossain K, Islam N, Ghavami F, Tucker M, Kowalshy T et al (2013) Interdependence of genotype and growing site on seed mineral compositions in common bean. Asian J Plant Sci 12:11–20
Ihemere U (2012) Iron biofortification and homeostasis in transgenic cassava roots expressing the algal iron assimilatory gene, FEA1. Front Plant Sci 3:1–22
Ishimaru Y, Suzuki M, Kobayashi T, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2005) OsZIP4, a novel zinc-regulated zinc transporter in rice. J Exp Bot 56:3207–3214
Ishimaru Y, Bashir K, Nishizawa NK (2011) Zn uptake and translocation in rice plants. Rice 4:21–27
Ishimaru Y, Takahashi R, Bashir K, Shimo H, Senoura T, Sugimoto K, Ono K, Yano M, Ishikawa S, Arao T et al (2012) Characterizing the role of rice NRAMP5 in manganese, iron and cadmium transport. Sci Rep 2:1–8
Jeong J, Cohu C, Kerkeb L, Pilon M, Connolly EL, Guerinot ML (2008) Chloroplast Fe(III) chelate reductase activity is essential for seedling viability under iron limiting conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:10619–10624
Jin T, Zhou J, Chen J, Zhu L, Zhao Y, Huang Y (2013) The genetic architecture of zinc and iron content in maize grains as revealed by QTL mapping and meta-analysis. Breed Sci 63:317–324
Joshi PK, Rao PP (2017) Global pulses scenario: status and outlook. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1392(1):6–17
Kanobe MN, Rodermel SR, Bailey T, Scott MP (2013) Changes in endogenous gene transcript and protein levels in maize plants expressing the soybean ferritin transgene. Front Plant Sci 4:1–14
Kim SA, Guerinot ML (2007) Mining iron: iron uptake and transport in plants. FEBS Lett 581:2273–2280
Kobayashi T, Nishizawa NK (2012) Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:131–152
Lanquar V, Ramos MS, Lelievre F, Barbier-Brygoo H, Krieger-Liszkay A, Kramer U, Thomine S (2010) Export of vacuolar manganese by AtNRAMP3 and AtNRAMP4 is required for optimal photosynthesis and growth under manganese deficiency. Plant Physiol 152:1986–1999
López-Millán AF, Duy D, Philippar K (2016) Chloroplast iron transport proteins—function and impact on plant physiology. Front Plant Sci 7:1–12
Mary V, Schnell Ramos M, Gillet C, Socha AL, Giraudat J, Agorio A, Merlot S, Clairet C, Kim SA, Punshon T et al (2015) bypassing iron storage in endodermal vacuoles rescues the iron mobilization defect in the natural resistance associated-macrophage protein3natural resistance associated-macrophage protein4 double mutant. Plant Physiol 169:748–759
Masuda H, Usuda K, Kobayashi T, Ishimaru Y, Kakei Y, Takahashi M, Higuchi K, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2009) Overexpression of the barley nicotianamine synthase gene HvNAS1 increases iron and zinc concentrations in rice grains. Rice 2:155–166
McClean P, Gepts P, Kami J (2004) Genomics and genetic diversity in common bean. In: Wilson RF, Stalker HT, Brummer EC (eds) Legume crop genomics. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, pp 60–82
Moreno-Moyano LT, Bonneau JP, Sánchez-Palacios JT, Tohme J, Johnson AAT (2016) Association of increased grain iron and zinc concentrations with agro-morphological traits of biofortified rice. Front Plant Sci 7:1–13
Mukherjee I, Campbell NH, Ash JS, Connolly EL (2006) Expression profiling of the Arabidopsis ferric chelate reductase (FRO) gene family reveals differential regulation by iron and copper. Planta 223:1178–1190
Nestel P, Bouis HE, Meenakshi JV, Pfeiffer W (2006) Symposium: food fortification in developing countries biofortification of staple food crops. J Nutr 136:1064–1067
Pereira HS, Del Peloso MJ, Bassinello PZ, Guimarães CM (2014) Genetic variability for iron and zinc content in common bean lines and interaction with water availability. Genet Mol Res 13:6773–6785
Pérez-Vega E, Pañeda A, Rodríguez-Suárez C, Campa A, Giraldez R, Ferreira JJ (2010) Mapping of QTL for morpho-agronomic and seed quality traits in a RIL population of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 120:1367–1380
Rogers EE, Wu X, Stacey G, Nguyen HT (2009) Two MATE proteins play a role in iron efficiency in soybean. J Plant Physiol 166:1453–1459
SAS-Institute (2011) SAS Institute Inc. 2011. SAS® 9.3 System Options: Reference, Second Edition
Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C et al (2014) A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3008
Schuler M, Rellán-Álvarez R, Fink-Straube C, Abadía J, Bauer P (2012) Nicotianamine functions in the phloem-based transport of iron to sink organs, in pollen development and pollen tube growth in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:2380–2400
Singh SP, Keller B, Gruissem W, Bhullar NK (2017) Rice NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE 2 expression improves dietary iron and zinc levels in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 130:283–292
Spindel JE, Begum H, Akdemir D, Collard B, Redoña E, Jannink J-L, McCouch S (2016) Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement. Heredity (Edinb) 116:395–408
Takahashi M, Terada Y, Nakai I, Nakanishi H, Yoshimura E, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2003) Role of nicotianamine in the intracellular delivery of metals and plant reproductive development. Plant Cell 15:1263–1280
Thomine S, Lelièvre F, Debarbieux E, Schroeder JI, Barbier-Brygoo H (2003) AtNRAMP3, a multispecific vacuolar metal transporter involved in plant responses to iron deficiency. Plant J 34:685–695
Tyagi S, Mir RR, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2015) Interval mapping and meta-QTL analysis of grain traits in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 201:367–380
Upadhyaya HD, Bajaj D, Das S, Kumar V, Gowda CLL, Sharma S, Tyagi AK, Parida SK (2016) Genetic dissection of seed-iron and zinc concentrations in chickpea. Sci Rep 6:24050
Van K, McHale LK (2017) Meta-analyses of QTL associated with protein and oil contents and compositions in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Seed. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061180
Vasconcellos RCC, Oraguzie OB, Soler A, Arkwazee H, Myers JR, Ferreira JJ, Song Q, McClean P, Miklas PN (2017) Meta-QTL for resistance to white mold in common bean. PLoS ONE 12:e0171685
Vasconcelos MW, Clemente TE, Grusak MA (2014) Evaluation of constitutive iron reductase (AtFRO2) expression on mineral accumulation and distribution in soybean (Glycine max. L). Front Plant Sci 5:1–12
Vasconcelos MW, Gruissem W, Bhullar NK (2017) Iron biofortification in the 21st century: setting realistic targets, overcoming obstacles, and new strategies for healthy nutrition. Curr Opin Biotechnol 44:8–15
Vert G, Grotz N, Dédaldéchamp F, Gaymard F, Lou Guerinot M, Briat J-F, Curie C (2002) IRT1, an arabidopsis transporter essential for iron uptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell 14:1223–1233
Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng Z-B (2012) Windows QTL cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh. http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/-WQTLCart.htm. Accessed 16 June 2017
Waters BM, Chu H-H, DiDonato RJ, Roberts LA, Eisley RB, Lahner B, Salt DE, Walker EL (2006) Mutations in arabidopsis yellow stripe-like1 and yellow stripe-like3 reveal their roles in metal ion homeostasis and loading of metal ions in seeds. Plant Physiol 141:1446–1458
Wintz H, Fox T, Wu YY, Feng V, Chen W, Chang HS, Zhu T, Vulpe C (2003) Expression profiles of arabidopsis thaliana in mineral deficiencies reveal novel transporters involved in metal homeostasis. J Biol Chem 278:47644–47653
Wu H, Li L, Du J, Yuan Y, Cheng X, Ling HQ (2005) Molecular and biochemical characterization of the Fe(III) chelate reductase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1505–1514
Wu Y, Huang M, Tao X, Guo T, Chen Z, Xiao W (2016) Quantitative trait loci identification and meta-analysis for rice panicle-related traits. Mol Genet Genomics 291:1927–1940
Yao N, Lee C-R, Semagn K, Sow M, Nwilene F, Kolade O, Bocco R, Oyetunji O, Mitchell-Olds T, Ndjiondjop M-N et al (2016) QTL mapping in three rice populations uncovers major genomic regions associated with African rice gall midge resistance. PLoS ONE 11:e0160749
Zhao FJ, Su YH, Dunham SJ, Rakszegi M, Bedo Z, McGrath SP, Shewry PR (2009) Variation in mineral micronutrient concentrations in grain of wheat lines of diverse origin. J Cereal Sci 49:290–295
Acknowledgements
Funding for this research was through USDA-ARS to K. Cichy and a USAID CRP4 Linkages Grant to B. Raatz (Grant Nos. 3635-21430-009-00D, 340001-040-001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Matthew N. Nelson.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Izquierdo, P., Astudillo, C., Blair, M.W. et al. Meta-QTL analysis of seed iron and zinc concentration and content in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 131, 1645–1658 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3104-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3104-8