Abstract
Wild populations of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) are self-incompatible and have deep seed dormancy, whereas modern cultivars, inbreds, and hybrids are self-compatible and partially-to-strongly self-pollinated, and have shallow seed dormancy. Self-pollination (SP) and seed dormancy are genetically complex traits, the number of self-compatibility (S) loci has been disputed, and none of the putative S loci have been genetically mapped in sunflower. We genetically mapped quantitative trait loci (QTL) for self-incompatibility (SI), SP, and seed dormancy in a backcross population produced from a cross between an elite, self-pollinated, nondormant inbred line (NMS373) and a wild, self-incompatible, dormant population (ANN1811). A population consisting of 212 BC1 progeny was subsequently produced by backcrossing a single hybrid individual to NMS373. BC1 progeny produced 0–838 seeds per primary capitula when naturally selfed and 0–518 seeds per secondary capitula when manually selfed and segregated for a single S locus. The S locus mapped to linkage group 17 and was tightly linked to a cluster of previously identified QTL for several domestication and postdomestication traits. Two synergistically interacting QTL were identified for SP among self-compatible (ss) BC1 progeny (R2=34.6%). NMS373 homozygotes produced 271.5 more seeds per secondary capitulum than heterozygotes. Germination percentages of seeds after-ripened for 4 weeks ranged from 0% to 100% among self-compatible BC1S1 families. Three QTL for seed dormancy were identified (R2=38.3%). QTL effects were in the predicted direction (wild alleles decreased self-pollination and seed germination). The present analysis differentiated between loci governing SI and SP and identified DNA markers for bypassing SI and seed dormancy in elite × wild crosses through marker-assisted selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Wild populations of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) are self-incompatible (Heiser 1954; Heiser et al. 1969) and have deep seed dormancy (Heiser 1976; Seiler 1988, 1996, 1998), whereas modern cultivars, inbreds, and hybrids are self-compatible and partially-to-strongly self-pollinated (Luciano et al. 1965; Fick and Zimmer 1976; Fick and Redher 1977; Fick 1978), and have short-lived seed dormancy (Alissa et al. 1986; Corbineau et al. 1990). Self-incompatibility (SI) and seed dormancy complicate breeding in elite × wild hybrids (Seiler 1992), and the genetic mechanisms underlying SI, self-pollination (SP), and seed dormancy in sunflower are either unknown or superficially known.
The SI system in sunflower is sporophytic (Ivanov 1975; Fernandez-Martinez and Knowles 1978) and undoubtedly similar in complexity to the sporophytic SI systems found in other genera (Nasrallah 2002; Hiscock and McInnis 2003). The number of SI loci (S loci) in common sunflower has been disputed, and none of the putative S loci have been genetically mapped. One multiallelic S locus was identified by Fernandez-Martinez and Knowles (1978) from analyses of SI among several self-incompatible wild hybrids, whereas two multiallelic S loci were identified from analyses of SI among self-compatible × self-incompatible hybrids (Habura 1957; Lofgren and Nelson 1977; Olivieri et al. 1988). SI was reported by Vranceanu et al. (1978) to be genetically complex (quantitative) and governed by an unknown number of loci.
Self-incompatibility enforces outcrossing in wild sunflower populations (Heiser 1954). Self-compatibility was apparently first discovered in elite germplasm (Russell 1952; Luciano et al. 1965) and was subsequently used to exploit genetic variability for SP in breeding programs. Selfing seems to be primarily affected by floret density, stigma orientation, and pollen agglutination (Segala et al. 1980; Miller and Fick 1997). Genetic, physiological, and morphological factors underlying selfing are complex; heritabilities for SP (seeds per capitulum produced by natural selfing) have been in the range of 0.1–0.5 (Luciano et al. 1965; Fick 1978; Leclerq 1980; Segala et al. 1980; Kovacik and Skaloud 1990). Despite the inherent complexity of the trait, selection for increased SP is straightfoward and routinely practiced in hybrid sunflower breeding programs and has pushed selfing percentages into the 80–100% range in modern inbred lines and hybrids (Fick and Zimmer 1976; Fick and Rehder 1977; Fick 1978).
The number and nature of loci controlling SP is unknown. Burke et al. (2002) identified two linked quantitative trait loci (QTL) for SP (seeds per capitulum produced by natural selfing) on linkage group (LG) 17 in an analysis of F2 progeny from an elite × wild hybrid (HA89 × ANN1238). QTL alleles from the elite parent were recessive, had a large effect, and increased SP. Because the F1 was self-compatible and capitula were not manually pollinated, Burke et al. (2002) concluded that the QTL affected autogamy (self-pollination) rather than SI.
Short-term embryo-imposed dormancy in domesticated sunflower germplasm hampers the rapid cycling of seeds in breeding programs. Seed germination is often accelerated by harvesting physiologically immature achenes and culturing embryos. Long-term pericarp-imposed dormancy is ubiquitous in wild germplasm (Heiser 1951, 1976; Heiser et al. 1969), complicates breeding in elite × wild crosses (Chandler and Jan 1985; Seiler 1992), and hampers seed multiplication in germplasm preservation and wild species breeding programs. Genetic analyses of seed dormancy have not been reported in sunflower (Corbineau et al. 1990; Seiler 1992; Miller and Fick 1997). QTL mapping is a powerful tool for exploratory analyses of natural genetic variability for seed dormancy and other domestication traits, particularly in elite × wild crosses where phenotypic differences between the parents are extreme (Fennimore et al. 1999; Cai and Morishima 2000; Burke et al. 2002; Koornneef et al. 2002). By mapping QTL governing SI, SP, and seed dormancy in sunflower, strategies can be developed for identifying genes and genetic mechanisms underlying the QTL (Koornneef et al. 2002; Borevitz and Chory 2004), selecting against SI and seed dormancy genes segregating in elite × wild populations, and accelerating the introgression of genes from wild populations through marker-assisted selection (MAS). The goal of the investigation reported here was to gain a deeper understanding of the genetics of SI, SP, and seed dormancy in sunflower by mapping QTL in an elite line × wild hybrid (NMS373 × ANN1811) and identifying and genetically mapping the S locus or loci.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and phenotyping
We crossed an unpigmented (tt), male-sterile (ms10 ms10) NMS373 individual to a pigmented (TT), male-fertile (Ms10Ms10) ANN1811 individual, and backcrossed a single hybrid plant (TMs10/tms10) to an unpigmented (tt), male-sterile (tms10/tms10) NMS373 individual. ANN1811 is a wild Helianthus annuus population collected from Skidmore, Texas, USA (PI 494567). NMS373 is a nuclear male-sterile line that is near-isogenic to the nuclear male-fertile, fertility restorer ®) line RHA373 (Miller 1997). BC1 seeds were planted in a pumice:peat moss:sandy loam growing media and grown for 4 weeks in a greenhouse; 212 four-week-old BC1 seedlings were transplanted to a field site near Corvallis, Oregon in May 2002. BC1 plants were planted 1 m apart in rows spaced 1 m apart.
SP was phenotyped by counting the number of seeds (achenes) produced per primary capitula by natural selfing, whereas SI was phenotyped by counting the number of seeds produced per secondary capitula by manual selfing. We bagged the primary and a single secondary capitula on each BC1 plant before the onset of flowering. Once bagged, primary capitula were not handled or manually pollinated, whereas secondary capitula were manually selfed (pollen was transferred using paper towels). Flower development was checked every day throughout flowering. Secondary capitula were manually selfed twice or thrice between the onset and completion of flowering. Both capitula were harvested at physiological maturity and dried for 72 h at 42–44°C in a gas-heated, forced-air dryer. Seeds (achenes) were threshed, cleaned, and stored at room temperature. The number of seeds produced by primary and second capitula were counted. Nearly one-half of the BC1 progeny (101/212) produced a sufficient number of BC1S1 seeds for seed dormancy phenotyping. BC1S1 seeds were stored at room temperature (approximately 24°C) for 4 weeks. Fifty seeds per BC1S1 family were then surface sterilized in 1 l water/2 g Benlate dissolved in ethanol, placed on moistened blotter paper, and germinated at 25°C under continuous light. Germination percentages were recorded 3 days and 7 days later.
DNA marker genotyping, genetic mapping, and QTL analyses
Leaf tissue was harvested from BC1 plants, placed on ice, and frozen at −80°C. Genomic DNA was isolated as described by Tang et al. (2002). We genotyped 132 simple sequence repeat (SSR), insertion-deletion polymorphism (INDEL), single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP), or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers on 212 NMS373 × ANN1811 BC1 progeny. The DNA markers were selected from a framework of 350 sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers genotyped on a subset of 94 randomly selected BC1 progeny (unpublished data). The 350 STS markers were chosen from a collection of previously described SSR and INDEL markers (identified by ORS and ZVG prefixes, respectively; Tang et al. 2002; Yu et al. 2002, 2003), new SSR, INDEL, SSCP, and SNP markers (unpublished data) developed from sunflower cDNA sequences (Kozik et al. 2002; identified by RGC and HT prefixes), and new INDEL and SNP markers developed for previously mapped restriction fragment length polymorphic (RFLP) marker loci (unpublished data) (identified by the ZVG prefix; Berry et al. 1997; Gedil et al. 2001). SSR and INDEL genotyping was performed as described by Tang et al. (2002), SSCP genotyping was performed as described by Hongtrakul et al. (1998), and SNP genotyping was performed as described by Kolkman et al. (2004). The primer sequences for previously unpublished public STS markers appearing on the 132-locus BC1 map and on a 27-cM-long segment on LG 17 of the 350-locus BC1 map, have been supplied as supplemental data (ESM). The genetic map was constructed using mapmaker (Lander et al. 1987), essentially as described by Tang et al. (2002).
NMS373 × ANN1811 was hypothesized to have segregated for a single SI locus (S locus). The S locus was genetically mapped using S-locus genotypes inferred from SI phenotypes (Ss for self-incompatible and ss for self-compatible BC1 individuals). The goodness-of-fit of the observed to the expected segregation ratio for the S locus was tested using a χ2-statistic (Sokal and Rohlf 1981). The wild parent (ANN1811) was presumed to be heterozygous for dominant or incompletely dominant SI alleles (SS′) and to have transmitted one of the alleles (S) to the hybrid (a single F1 plant was backcrossed), while the elite parent (NMS373) was presumed to be homozygous for a recessive self-compatibility allele (ss). The expected segregation ratio in the BC1 was 1 Ss (self-incompatible):1 ss (self-compatible).
Two QTL analyses were performed for SI, SP, and seed dormancy. First, QTL were identified and statistics estimated using composite interval mapping (CIM) (Zeng 1993, 1994), as implemented in qtl cartographer (Basten et al. 2002). Second, DNA marker loci tightly linked to QTL identified by CIM were used as independent variables in mixed model analyses, where intralocus and interlocus QTL effects were estimated (described below). CIM analyses were performed using a 2-cM window and one to five cofactors; LOD scores were compared to an empirical genome-wide significance threshold calculated from 1,000 permutations for P=0.05 (Doerge and Churchill 1996). QTL effects (backcross genotype mean differences) and coefficients of determination (R2) were estimated by CIM for each QTL. One-LOD support intervals were calculated as described by Conneally et al. (1985) and Lynch and Walsh (1997).
The intralocus and interlocus effects of QTL for SI and SP were estimated by using the S locus and DNA marker loci (ORS292 and ORS349) as independent variables in a 23 factorial mixed linear model (S, ORS292, and ORS349 were tightly linked to QTL identified by CIM). The 23 effects of genotypes were fixed, whereas the effects of BC1 progeny nested in genotypes were random. The intralocus and interlocus effects among loci were estimated using linear contrasts among least square means (Littel et al. 1996): y AA −y Aa for single-locus effects (S, ORS292, and ORS349), (y AABB −y AaBB −y AABb + y AaBb )/2 for two-locus interaction effects (S × ORS292, S × ORS349, and ORS292 × ORS349), and (y AABBCC −y AaBBCC −y AABbCC + y AaBbCC −y AABBCc + y AaBBCc + y AABbCc −y AaBbCc )/4 for the three-locus interaction effect (S × ORS292 × ORS349), where A, B, and C index loci in the three-locus model, y AA and y Aa are least square means for AA (NMS373 homozygotes) and Aa genotypes, respectively, y AABB , y AaBB , y AABb , and y AaBb are least square means for AABB, AaBB, AABb, and AaBb genotypes, respectively, and y AABBCC , y AaBBCC , y AABbCC , y AaBbCC , y AABBCc , y AaBBCc , y AABbCc , and y AaBbCc are least square means for the AABBCC, AaBBCC, AABbCC, AaBbCC, AABBCc, AaBBCc, AABbCc, and AaBbCc genotypes, respectively. Type-III sums of squares, Type-III F-statistics, and least square means for genotypes were estimated using sas proc mixed (http://www.sas.org), where F=MS G /MSP:G is an F-statistic, MS G is the mean square for the three intralocus or four interlocus effects, and MSP:G is the mean square for BC1 progeny nested in genotypes (the residual). S, ORS349, ORS292, S × ORS349, S × ORS292, ORS349 × ORS292, and S × ORS349 × ORS292 effects were estimated using the complete BC1 mapping population (n=212). ORS349, ORS292, and ORS349 × ORS292 effects were separately estimated among self-compatible (ss) BC1 progeny (n=91). The intralocus and interlocus effects of QTL for seed dormancy were estimated by using three DNA marker loci (ZVG3, ZVG9, and ORS1114) as independent variables in a 23 factorial mixed linear model (ZVG3, ZVG9, and ORS1114 were tightly linked to QTL identified by CIM).
Results
Genetic mapping in NMS373 × ANN1811
We genotyped 132 STS markers on 212 NMS373 × [NMS373 × ANN1811] BC1 progeny. The loci assembled into 18 linkage groups (the complete map has been supplied as ESM). Two of the linkage groups were found to be upper and lower fragments of LG 10 (Tang et al. 2002; Yu et al. 2003). The other 16 linkage groups matched previously identified linkage groups. The two LG 10 fragments were oriented, and the gap between fragments was identified by using previously mapped SSR and INDEL marker loci and found to span the ORS910-ORS595A interval. The 132 DNA marker loci were chosen from a collection of 350 DNA marker loci mapped on a subset of 94 BC1 progeny (unpublished data) so as to maximize genome coverage and pull linkage groups together and included the 34 endmost STS markers from each linkage group. Groups and locus orders were identical for common STS marker loci on the 132- and 350-locus NMS373 × ANN1811 and previously described maps (Tang et al. 2002; Yu et al. 2003). The 132-locus BC1 map was 1,450 cM long and had a mean density of 11 cM per locus (ESM). The BC1 did not segregate for male-sterility as expected. We suspect that the original hybrid (NMS373/ANN1811) was homozygous male-fertile (Ms10Ms10), not heterozygous male-fertile (Ms10ms10).
Genetic mapping of the SI locus (S)
NMS373, ANN1811, and the BC1 progeny were branched and produced multiple capitula per plant. The SI and SP phenotypes of the parents (ANN1811 and NMS373) were ascertained by naturally and manually selfing primary capitula on separate plants; male-fertile (Ms10ms10) NMS373 plants were phenotyped. The self-incompatible parent (ANN1811) produced no seeds when naturally or manually selfed, whereas the self-compatible parent (NMS373) produced significantly more seeds per capitulum by manual than natural selfing (375.4 and 250.2 seeds per capitulum, respectively) (P<0.0001) (Fig. 1). NMS373 was not fully self-pollinated. One-third of the disk flowers within NMS373 capitula failed to produce seed by natural selfing (250.2/375.4 × 00=67%).
SI and SP segregated in NMS373 × ANN1811 (Figs. 1, 2). The SI distribution was approximately exponential and was inferred to be a mixture of an exponential and a normal distribution (Fig. 2). The left-hand distribution was leptokurtic, right-skewed, and approximately exponential with a range of 0 to approximately 50 seeds per capitulum, whereas the right-hand distribution was platykurtic and approximately normal, with a range of approximately 50–518 seeds per capitulum; one-half of the BC1 individuals produced fewer than 47 seeds per capitulum (Fig. 2).
CIM identified a single QTL for SI on LG 17 (si17.1) (Figs. 3, 4; Table 1). The QTL was flanked by ZVG80 and ORS735 (Fig. 3). Because this QTL had a large effect (LOD=52.1; R2=66.2), no other QTL were identified, and one-half of the progeny were tightly clustered in the lower end of the SI distribution. The BC1 was inferred to have segregated for a single SI locus (S), where the S allele was transmitted by ANN1811, the s allele was transmitted by NMS373, S was completely or incompletely dominant to s, and BC1 progeny were either heterozygous and partially to fully self-incompatible (Ss) or homozygous for the NMS373 allele and self-compatible (ss) (Fig. 1).
The S locus was genetically mapped using genotypes inferred from SI phenotypes (Figs. 1, 2). We used conservative rules to assign BC1 individuals to genotypic classes (Ss and ss) to minimize misascertainment errors and maximize mapping accuracy. S-locus genotypes were inferred for 179 BC1 individuals with unambiguous phenotypes; the phenotypes for 26 BC1 individuals were ambiguous (identified by inverted triangles in Fig. 1). Of the latter, 18 produced 29–89 seeds per capitulum when manually selfed, and these spanned the overlapping upper tail of the self-incompatible (Ss) and lower tail of the self-compatible (ss) classes; eight produced 1–23 seeds per capitulum when manually selfed, but 31–75 seeds per capitulum when naturally selfed. BC1 progeny producing fewer than 27 seeds per capitulum by manual and natural selfing (87) were classified as heterozygotes (Ss), whereas BC1 progeny producing more than 100 seeds per capitulum by manual selfing (92) were classified as ss homozygotes (Fig. 1). The observed segregation ratio for S (87 Ss:92 ss) was not significantly different from 1:1 (χ2=0.089; P=0.76). The S locus mapped to LG 17, was flanked by ZVG80 and ORS735, and was centered directly under the maximum LOD for the SI QTL identified by CIM (Fig. 3).
We aligned a 19.3-cM interval spanning ORS1245-S-ZVG152 on LG 17 of the NMS × ANN1811 map with a 27-cM interval spanning ORS561-ORS1245-P-ZVG152 on LG 17 of an updated rendition of the RHA280 × RHA801 map (unpublished data) to identify additional STS markers linked to S and to assess the proximity of S to the QTL identified by Burke et al. (2002) (Fig. 5). Forty-four STS marker loci have been mapped to the ORS1245-ZVG152 interval spanning S; however, none seem to be closer than ORS592, ORS625, or ORS735, a cluster of three SSR marker loci 2.4 cM downstream of S (primer sequences for previously unpublished STS markers in the ORS561-ZVG152 interval have been supplied as ESM).
The S allele transmitted by ANN1811 was deduced to be incompletely dominant because very few BC1 progeny (5/212) were completely self-incompatible (produced no seeds when manually selfed). ANN1811 individuals produced seeds when intercrossed but not when selfed. Moreover, two of three elite × wild (self-compatible × self-incompatible) hybrids screened for SI (CMS372 × PI 435593, CMS372 × PI 468575, and CMS372 × PI 531022) were self-compatible; hence, incompletely dominant or weak S alleles seem to be present, but are not necessarily common, in wild sunflower populations.
Genetic mapping of QTL for self-pollination
The phenotypic correlation between SI and SP was 0.71 (P<0.0001) among BC1 progeny (Fig. 1). The mean and maximum number of seeds per capitulum among BC1 progeny was significantly greater for primary capitula (phenotyped for SP) than secondary capitula (phenotyped for SI) because the number of disk flowers was generally greater in the former than the latter. Because phenotypic differences for SP per se cannot be ascertained between self-incompatible and self-compatible parents, the segregation of SP self-pollination QTL in NMS373 × ANN1811 could not be predicted a priori but was observed among self-compatible NMS373 × ANN1811 BC1 progeny. Several BC1 progeny were self-compatible but not strongly self-pollinated, e.g., two self-compatible individuals (BC1-104 and BC1-125) produced 137 and 240 seeds per capitulum, respectively, when manually selfed and no seeds when naturally selfed (Fig. 1). Conversely, several BC1 progeny were self-compatible and strongly self-pollinated; for example, BC1-72 and BC1-147 produced 451 and 403 seeds per capitulum, respectively, when manually selfed and 797 and 838 seeds per capitulum when naturally selfed. Nearly one-half of the progeny (97/200) produced fewer seeds by natural than manual selfing.
Three QTL for SP were identified by CIM (Figs. 3, 4; Table 1). One mapped to LG 17 (sp17.1), had a very large effect, was coincident with si17.1 and the S locus, and was inferred to have been caused by the S locus. Mixed model QTL analyses, performed using genotypes for the S locus and two DNA marker loci (ORS292 and ORS349) as independent variables, shed light on effects of and interactions among SP QTL (Tables 2, 3). ORS349 and ORS292 were tightly linked to sp6.1 and sp15.1, respectively (Fig. 4). The seven intralocus and interlocus effects of S, ORS292, and ORS349 were significant for SP, whereas only S was significant for SI (Table 2). The R2 for the three-locus (32 factorial) model for SP was 68.0%, the self-compatible, self-pollinated parent (NMS373) transmitted alleles for increasing SP, and the four epistatic interactions were synergistic (increased SP). The S × ORS349, S × ORS292, and S × ORS349 × ORS292 interaction (epistatic) effects were caused in part by the absence of QTL effects among Ss individuals and by the presence of QTL effects among ss individuals (ORS292- and ORS349-linked SP QTL had no effect in Ss individuals).
We performed a separate analysis among self-compatible BC1 progeny to estimate the effects of SP QTL in the absence of the masking effect of the S locus (Table 3). The effects of the two SP QTL (sp6.1 and sp15.1) were found to be several-fold greater when analyses were performed on self-compatible (ss) BC1 progeny using only ORS349 and ORS292 as independent variables (91 out of 178 BC1 progeny were ss). ORS292- and ORS349-linked QTL effects were significant and large (yAA−yAa=135.8 seeds per capitulum for both), and the ORS292 × ORS349 epistatic effect was significant and synergistic [(yAABB −yAaBB−yAABb + yAaBb)/2=73.6 seeds per capitulum]; BC1 progeny homozygous for NMS373 alleles at both loci (AABB) produced significantly more seeds per capitulum (478.1) than progeny heterozygous for one of the two loci (AaBB or AABb) (268.7 seeds per capitulum for both). Double heterozygotes (AaBb) produced only slightly fewer seeds per capitulum (206.6) than single heterozygotes; hence, QTL alleles transmitted by the elite parent synergistically interacted to increase SP. Two-thirds of the phenotypic variability among ss BC1 progeny for SP, however, was not explained by the two QTL; the R2 for the two-locus (22 factorial) model was 34.6%.
Genetic mapping of QTL for seed dormancy
Seed dormancy was phenotyped by germinating field-produced ANN1811, NMS373, and BC1S1 seeds harvested from primary and secondary capitula and after-ripened for 1 month, the period typically required to break dormancy in physiologically mature seeds of domesticate (elite) genotypes. Sufficient BC1S1 seeds were produced on 101 BC1 progeny for seed dormancy phenotyping (the other progeny were either SI or weakly self-pollinated and produced insufficient seed for germination tests) (Fig. 1). Seven-day germination percentages for ANN1811 and NMS373 were 0% and 100%, respectively, and ranged from 0% to 100% among BC1S1 families (Fig. 6). The speed of germination was assessed by comparing 3-day and 7-day germination percentages and varied among BC1S1 families. The phenotypic correlation between 3-day and 7-day germination percentage was 0.80 (P<0.001). QTL were mapped using 7-day germination percentages only. The phenotypic distribution for 7-day germination percentage was approximately normal and slightly right-skewed (towards the elite parent). CIM identified three seed dormancy QTL (sg3.1,sg11.1, and sg15.1) (Fig. 4). The intralocus effects were positive for each QTL (17.2%, 22.7%, and 19.3% for sg3.1,sg11.1, and sg15.1, respectively); hence, alleles transmitted by the elite parent increased seed germination. Slightly more than one-half of the phenotypic variability was not explained by QTL (the R2 for the three-QTL model was 43.4%). No significant epistatic interactions were found when a mixed model QTL analysis of the 23 factorial was performed on DNA marker loci closest to sg3.1,sg11.1, and sg15.1 (ZVG9, ZVG51, and ORS1141).
Discussion
SI is governed by a single, genetically complex, multiallelic S locus in several genera of flowering plants (de Nettancourt 1977; Nasrallah 2002; Hiscock and McInnis 2003). By performing a genome-wide search and distinguishing between QTL for autogamy (natural SP) and SI, we identified a single SI locus (S) in sunflower (Figs. 1, 2), as was hypothesized by Fernandez-Martinez and Knowles (1978), but contrary to the findings of Habura (1957), Lofgren and Nelson (1977), Olivieri et al. (1988), and Vranceanu et al. (1988). Earlier genetic analyses of SI in sunflower were performed before the development of DNA markers and STS maps (Tang et al. 2002, 2003; Yu et al. 2003), thereby precluding comparative mapping and genome-wide scans for loci controlling SI and SP. S loci could be duplicated and hemizygous in interspecific hybrids carrying rearranged chromosomal segments (Rieseberg et al. 1993, 1995; Rieseberg 1998; Burke et al. 2004); for example, the two independent S loci reportedly segregated in H. annuus × H. bolanderi Gray and H. annuus × H. exilis Gary hybrids (Olivieri et al. 1988) and could have been produced by a translocation or inversion of the chromosomal segment harboring S on LG 17 in H. annuus (Figs. 3, 5). Searches for unlinked S loci can be rapidly performed using STS marker loci linked to S (Fig. 5) and systematically screening STS marker loci strategically positioned throughout the sunflower genome (Tang et al. 2002, 2003; Yu et al. 2003).
Self-compatible S alleles arise through loss-of-function mutations (Nasrallah 2002; Hiscock and McInnis 2003) and have undoubtedly arisen more than once in sunflower. Mutations in either of the physically linked S genes in Brassica disrupt the receptor-ligand protein interaction, thereby causing the loss of SI (Nasrallah 2002). The original sources of self-compatibility (loss-of-function mutations in S) used in sunflower breeding are not known. Self-compatibility was known in the pre-hybrid era in sunflower (Russell 1952; Luciano et al. 1965). Selection for self-compatibility and SP became increasingly important in sunflower breeding once cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility was discovered and single-cross hybrids were introduced (Fick and Rehder 1977; Fick 1978; Miller and Fick 1997). SI was needed for inbred line development, and SP was needed to reduce insect pollinator requirements, maximize seed yields, and produce oilseed sunflower on a commodity scale (Fick and Zimmer 1976; Fick and Rehder 1977; Miller and Fick 1997). Hybrids mask the effects of deleterious recessive alleles exposed by inbreeding in inbred line development and, consequently, are the ideal vehicle for utilizing self-pollination in a heterotic, insect-pollinated, allogamous species.
Haplotypes of the highly polymorphic S locus in Brassica are typically incompletely or completely dominant (Nasrallah 2002). The S allele segregating in NMS373 × ANN1811 was inferred to be incompletely dominant because fully self-incompatible BC1 individuals were rare, the wild parent (ANN1811) produced no seeds when manually selfed, the phenotypes produced by SS′ and Ss genotypes differed, and 94.3% of heterozygote (Ss) BC1 progeny produced 1–30 seeds per capitulum (Fig. 1). Seeds may have been produced in Ss individuals by bypassing SI through the transfer of pollen from mature anthers on outer whorls of disk flowers to immature stigmas on inner whorls of disk flowers, so-called ‘bud-pollination’ (de Nettancourt 1977) or by weak or leaky SI phenotypes, such as those produced by class-II S haplotypes in Brassica (Nasrallah and Nasrallah 1993; Cabrillac et al. 1999). We discounted bud-pollination because seed could not be produced by manually selfing the wild parent.
LOD peaks for two large-effect self-pollination QTL identified by Burke et al. (2002) on the lower end of LG 17 in HA89 × ANN1811 were separated by a distance of 16.3 cM. We suspect that one of the QTL was an artifact of a locus ordering error and that a single QTL for self-pollination was present on LG 17 in HA89 × ANN1238. When we aligned the HA89 × ANN1238 map (Burke et al. 2002) with three other maps (Tang et al. 2002; Yu et al. 2003), a locus ordering error was discovered on the lower end of LG 17 in HA89 × ANN1238. ORS204 mapped to the bottom of LG 17 in HA89 × ANN1238, below the second QTL for self-pollination (Burke et al. 2002), but mapped near the middle of LG 17 in RHA280 × RHA801 and PHA × PHB (Yu et al. 2003), above ORS727, ORS811, and the second QTL identified by Burke et al. (2002) and below ORS297 and ORS561 (Fig. 5). ORS204 was deduced to be several centiMorgans upstream of S and the SI and SP QTL we identified on LG 17 in NMS373 × ANN1811 (Figs. 2, 4). Shifting the position of ORS204 to the ORS561-ORS727 interval on the HA89 × ANN1238 map eliminates the erroneous ORS804 (EG825)-ORS204 interval and the lower QTL for SP identified by Burke et al. (2002). The upper QTL for self-pollination on LG 17 in HA89 × ANN1238 was centered on ORS811 (Burke et al. 2002), an SSR marker a few centiMorgans upstream of ORS735 on LG 17 (Tang et al. 2002, 2003; Yu et al. 2003). ORS735 is tightly linked to S (Fig. 3); hence, the upper QTL for self-pollination identified by Burke et al. (2002) was undoubtedly caused by the segregation of the S locus. The S locus had the largest effect on self-pollination in NMS373 × ANN1811 and produced an R2 estimate similar in magnitude to the R2 estimate for the SP QTL identified in HA89 × ANN1238 (Table 1; Fig. 3).
S genes have not yet been identified in sunflower. The sunflower S locus is undoubtedly genetically complex, as in the crucifers where two molecularly complex, physically linked genes (SRK and SCR) confer SI (Nasrallah 2002; Hiscock and McInnis 2003). The products of SRK and SCR function as receptors and ligands in self-recognition. S loci in the crucifers are highly polymorphic, and 50–60 haplotypes have been identified in Brassica (Boyes and Nasrallah 1993; Nou et al. 1993; Boyes et al. 1997; Ockendon 2000; Ruffio-Chable and Gaude 2001). The number of S-locus variants is not known in sunflower. The S locus is under strong selection and should be highly polymorphic in SI wild populations. It resides in an apparently gene-rich region on LG 17 that harbors a cluster of 20 QTL for domestication, morphological, and agronomic traits (Burke et al. 2002; Tang et al. 2005). Genetic variability for loci linked to S should be perpetuated by heterozygote selection and hitchhiking. Until S genes are cloned in sunflower, the S locus can be tracked and SI alleles can be selected in elite × wild crosses using flanking DNA markers identified in the present study. The closest STS markers (HT945 and ORS735) flank S by 2.4 cM and 6.1 cM (Fig. 5), so double-crossovers should be rare in the HT945-ORS735 interval.
Significantly larger seed samples and additional after-ripening and germination treatments are needed to validate the seed dormancy QTL identified in NMS373 × ANN1811. The seed supply was limited in the present study, and backcrossing to the elite parent was necessary because the wild parent was self-incompatible, as are most dormant genotypes in sunflower (Heiser 1951, 1976; Heiser et al. 1969; Seiler 1988, 1992, 1996, 1997, 1998); however, certain elite × wild hybrids carry incompletely dominant or leaky S alleles and can be selfed to produce inbred progenies and recombinant inbred lines (RILs) for developmental and QTL analyses; for example, self-compatibility was observed in two of the hybrids we tested (CMS372 × PI 468575 and CMS372 × PI 531022) and in HA89 × ANN1238 by Burke et al. (2002).
RILs facilitate the analysis of large, homogenous seed populations (Koornneef et al. 2002; Clerkx et al. 2004) that are free of the confounding effects of genotypic differences between the pericarp (maternal parent) and embryo (offspring). Such effects are critical in sunflower where embryo- and pericarp-imposed seed dormancy mechanisms seem to be operating (Corbineau et al. 1990; Connor and Hall 1997). QTL analyses in additional genetic backgrounds, on a larger scale, and at a higher resolution are needed to further unravel the genetics of seed dormancy in sunflower.
References
Alissa A, Jonard R, Serieys H, Vincourt P (1986) La culture d’embryons isoles dans un programme d’amelioration du tournesol. C R Acad Sci Paris 302:161–164
Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB (2002) qtl cartographer. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.
Berry ST, Leon AJ, Peerbolte R, Challis C, Livini C, Jones R, Feingold S (1997) Presentation of the Advanta sunflower RFLP linkage map for public research. In: Proc 19th Sunflower Res Workshop. Fargo, N.D., pp 113–118
Borevitz JO, Chory J (2004) Genomics tools for QTL analysis and gene discovery. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:132–136
Boyes DC, Nasrallah JB (1993) Physical linkage of the SLG and SRK genes at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Mol Gen Genet 236:369–373
Boyes DC, Nasrallah ME, Vrebalov J, Nasrallah JB (1997) The self-incompatibility (S) haplotypes of Brassica contain highly divergent and rearranged sequences of ancient origin. Plant Cell 9:237–247
Burke JM, Tang S, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH (2002) Genetic analysis of sunflower domestication. Genetics 161:1257–1267
Burke JM, Lai Z, Salmaso M, Nakazato T, Tang S, Heesacker A, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH (2004) Comparative mapping and rapid karyotypic evolution in the genus Helianthus. Genetics 167:449–457
Cabrillac D, Delorme V, Garin J, Ruffio-Chable V et al (1999) The S15 self-incompatibility haplotype in Brassica oleracea includes three S gene family members expressed in stigmas. Plant Cell 11:971–986
Cai HW, Morishima H (2000) Genomic regions affecting seed shattering and seed dormancy in rice. Theor Appl Genet 100:840–846
Chandler JM, Jan CC (1985) Comparison of germination techniques for wild Helianthus seeds. Crop Sci 25:356–358
Clerkx EJM, El-Lithy ME, Veirling E, Ruys GJ, Blankestijn-De Vries et al (2004) Analysis of natural allelic variation of Arabidopsis seed germination and seed longevity traits between the accessions Landsberg erecta and Shakdara, using a new recombinant inbred line population. Plant Physiol 135:432–443
Conneally PM, Edwards JH, Kidd KK, Lalouel JM, Morton NE, Ott J, White R (1985) Report of the committee on methods of linkage analysis and reporting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 40:356–359
Connor DJ, Hall AJ (1997) Sunflower physiology. In: Schneiter AA (ed) Sunflower technology and production. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 113–182
Corbineau F, Baginol S, Come D (1990) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed dormancy and its regulation by ethylene. Isr J Bot 39:313–325
Doerge RW, Churchill GA (1996) Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative trait. Genetics 142:285–294
Fennimore SA, Nyquist WE, Shaner GE, Doerge RW, Foley ME (1999) A genetic model and molecular markers for wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed dormancy. Theor Appl Genet 99:711–718
Fernandez-Martinez J, Knowles PF (1978) Inheritance of self incompatibility in wild sunflower. In: Proc 8th Int Sunflower Conf. Minneapolis, Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 484–489
Fick GN (1978) Selection for self-fertility and oil percentage in development of sunflower hybrids. In: Proc 8th Int Sunflower Conf. Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 418–422
Fick GN, Rehder D (1977) Selection criteria in development of high oil sunflower hybrids. In: Proc 2nd Sunflower Forum, Fargo, Natl Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 26–27
Fick GN, Zimmer DE (1976) Yield stability of sunflower hybrids and open pollinated varieties. In: Proc 7th Int Sunflower Conf. Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 253–258
Gedil MA, Wye C, Berry S, Segers B, Peleman J et al (2001) An integrated restriction fragment length polymorphism-amplified fragment length polymorphism linkage map for cultivated sunflower. Genome 44:213–221
Habura ECH (1957) Parasterilitat bei sonnenblumen. Z Pflanzenzuecht 37:280–298
Heiser CB (1951) The sunflower among North American Indians. Proc Am Philos Soc 95:432–448
Heiser CB (1954) Variation and subspeciation in the common sunflower, Helianthus annuus. Am Midl Nat 51:287–305
Heiser CB (1976) The sunflower. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman
Heiser CB, Smith DM, Clevenger SB, Martin WC (1969) The North American sunflowers (Helianthus). Mem Torr Bot Club 22:1–218
Hiscock SJ, McInnis SM (2003) Pollen recognition and rejection during the sporophytic self-incompatibility response: Brassica and beyond. Trends Plant Sci 8:1360–1385
Hongtrakul V, Slabaugh MB, Knapp SJ (1998) DFLP, SSCP, and SSR markers for Δ 9-stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturases strongly expressed in developing seeds of sunflower: intron lengths are hypervariable among elite inbred lines. Mol Breed 4:195–203
Ivanov IG (1975) Study on compatibility and incompatibility display in crossing selfed sunflower lines. Rastenievud Nauk 12:36–40
Kolkman J, Slabaugh MB, Bruniard J, Berry S, Bushman SB, Olungu C, Maes N, Abratti G, Zambelli A, Miller JF, Leon A, Knapp SJ (2004) Acetohydroxyacid synthase mutations conferring resistance to imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicides in sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 109:1147–1155
Koornneef M, Bentsink L, Hilhorst H (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:33–36
Kovacik A, Skaloud (1990) Results of inheritance evaluation of agronomically important traits in sunflower. Helia 13:41–46
Kozik A, Michelmore RW, Knapp SJ, Matvienko MS, Rieseberg LH et al (2002) Lettuce and sunflower expressed sequences tags (ESTs) (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu).
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg F (1987) mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181
LeClercq P (1980) Etudes genetiques sur l’autosterilite chez le tournesol. Ann Amelior Plant 30:499–501
Littel RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. Statistical Analysis System, Cary, N.C.
Lofgren JR, Nelson L (1977) Breeding for self incompatibility in sunflowers. In: Proc 2nd Sunflower Res Workshop. Fargo, Natl Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 2–4
Luciano A, Kinman ML, Smith JD (1965) Heritability of self-incompatibility in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Crop Sci 5:529–532
Lynch M, Walsh B (1997) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland
Miller JF (1997) Registration of cmsHA89 (PEF1) cytoplasmic male-sterile, RPEF1 restorer, and two nuclear male-sterile (NMS 373 and 377) sunflower genetic stocks. Crop Sci 37:1984
Miller JF, Fick GN (1997) The genetics of sunflower. In: Schneiter AA (ed) Sunflower technology and production. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 441–495
Nasrallah JB (2002) Recognition and rejection of self in plant reproduction. Science 296:305–308
Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME (1993) Pollen-stigma signalling in the sporophytic self-incompatibility response. Plant Cell 5:1325–1335
Nettancourt D de (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Nou IS, Watanabe M, Isogai A, Hinata K (1993) Comparison of S-alleles and S-glycoproteins between two wild populations of Brassica campestris in Turkey and Japan. Sex Plant Reprod 6:79–86
Ockendon DJ (2000) The S-allele collection of Brassica oleracea. Acta Hortic 539:25–30
Olivieri AM, Lucchin M, Parrini P (1988) Self-sterility and incompatibility in sunflower. In: Proc 12th Int Sunflower Conf. Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 339–343
Rieseberg LH (1998) Genetic mapping as a tool for studying speciation. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 459–487
Rieseberg LH, Choi H, Chan R, Spore C (1993) Genomic map of a diploid hybrid species. Heredity 70:285–293
Rieseberg LH, Van Fossen C, Desrochers A (1995) Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375:313–316
Ruffio-Chable V, Gaude T (2001) S-haplotype polymorphism in Brassica oleracea. Acta Hort 546:257–261
Russell WA (1952) A study of the relationships of seed yield, oil content, and other agronomic characters with sunflower inbred lines and their topcrosses. Can J Agric Sci 33:291–314
Segala A, Segala M, Piquemal G (1980) Recherches en vue d’ameliorer le degre d’autogamie des cultivars de tournesol. I. L’autogamie et l’autocompatibilite pollinique. Ann Amelior Plant 30:151–159
Seiler G (1988) Influence of pH, storage temperature, and maturity on germination of four wild annual sunflower species (Helianthus spp.). In: Proc 12th Int Sunflower Conf. Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 269–270
Seiler GJ (1992) Utilization of wild sunflower species for the improvement of cultivated sunflower. Field Crops Res 30:195–230
Seiler GJ (1996) Dormancy and germination of wild Helianthus species. In: Caligari PDS, Hind DJN (eds) Compositae: biology and utilitzation. Proc Int Compositae Conf. Kew Gardens, UK, pp 213–222
Seiler GJ (1997) Anatomy and morphology of sunflower. In: Schneiter AA (ed) Sunflower technology and production. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 67–111
Seiler GJ (1998) Seed maturity, storage time and temperature, and media treatment effects on germination of two wild sunflowers. Agron J 90:221–226
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, New York
Tang S, Yu JK, Slabaugh MB, Shintani DK, Knapp SJ (2002) Simple sequence repeat map of the sunflower genome. Theor Appl Genet 105:1124–1136
Tang S, Kishore VK, Knapp SJ (2003) PCR-multiplexes for a genome-wide framework of simple sequence repeat marker loci in cultivated sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 107:6–19
Tang S, Leon A, Bridges WC, Knapp SJ (2005) Quantitative trait loci for genetically correlated seed traits epistatically interact and are tightly linked to branching and pericarp pigment loci in sunflower. Crop Sci (in press)
Vranceanu AV, Stoenescu FM, Scarlat A (1978) The influence of different genetic and environmental factors on pollen self-compatibility in sunflower. In: Proc 8th Int Sunflower Conf. Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 453–465
Vranceanu AV, Iuoras M, Stoenescu FM (1988) Genetic study of short petiole trait and its use in sunflower breeding. In: Proc 12th Int Sunflower Conf. Int Sunflower Assoc, Paris, pp 429–434
Yu JK, Mangor J, Thompson L, Edwards KJ, Slabaugh MB, Knapp SJ (2002) Allelic diversity of simple sequence repeat markers among elite inbred lines in cultivated sunflower. Genome 45:652–660
Yu JK, Tang S, Slabaugh MB, Heesacker A, Cole G, Herring M, Soper JJ, Han F, Chu WC, Webb DM, Thompson L, Edwards KJ, Berry S, Leon A, Olungu C, Maes N, Knapp SJ (2003) Towards a saturated molecular genetic linkage map for cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci 43:367–387
Zeng ZB (1993) Theoretical basis of separation of multiple linked gene effects on mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10972–10976
Zeng ZB (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136:1457–1468
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by grants to S.J. Knapp from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program Plant Genome Program (no. 98-35300-6166) and the USDA Cooperative State Research Education and Extension Service Initiative for Future Agricultural and Food Systems Plant Genome Program (no. 2000-04292).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by F.J. Muehlbauer
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gandhi, S.D., Heesacker, A.F., Freeman, C.A. et al. The self-incompatibility locus (S) and quantitative trait loci for self-pollination and seed dormancy in sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 111, 619–629 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1934-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1934-7