Abstract
Two long and one truncated isoforms (termed LAP*, LAP, and LIP, respectively) of the transcription factor CCAAT enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) are expressed from a single intronless Cebpb gene by alternative translation initiation. Isoform expression is sensitive to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated activation of the translation initiation machinery and relayed through an upstream open reading frame (uORF) on the C/EBPβ mRNA. The truncated C/EBPβ LIP, initiated by high mTOR activity, has been implied in neoplasia, but it was never shown whether endogenous C/EBPβ LIP may function as an oncogene. In this study, we examined spontaneous tumor formation in C/EBPβ knockin mice that constitutively express only the C/EBPβ LIP isoform from its own locus. Our data show that deregulated C/EBPβ LIP predisposes to oncogenesis in many tissues. Gene expression profiling suggests that C/EBPβ LIP supports a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment, resistance to apoptosis, and alteration of cytokine/chemokine expression. The results imply that enhanced translation reinitiation of C/EBPβ LIP promotes tumorigenesis. Accordingly, pharmacological restriction of mTOR function might be a therapeutic option in tumorigenesis that involves enhanced expression of the truncated C/EBPβ LIP isoform.
Key message
-
Elevated C/EBPβ LIP promotes cancer in mice.
-
C/EBPβ LIP is upregulated in B-NHL.
-
Deregulated C/EBPβ LIP alters apoptosis and cytokine/chemokine networks.
-
Deregulated C/EBPβ LIP may support a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The CCAAT enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) transcription factor belongs to the basic leucine zipper (bZip) C/EBP family and controls cell fate in many tissues. C/EBPβ is involved in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, senescence, and tumor tolerance. Cebpb is a single exon gene, yet three isoform proteins of variable N-terminal length are expressed from internal AUG start sites. The two long isoforms (C/EBPβ liver-enriched activator proteins LAP* and LAP) are both transcriptional activators, but differ by 21 N-terminal amino acid residues that entail chromatin regulatory capacity. The truncated C/EBPβ liver inhibitory protein (LIP) isoform lacks the N-terminal 185 amino acid residues, removing the entire transactivation domain and part of the regulatory domain. C/EBPβ LIP is thought to dominantly counteract tumor suppressive functions of other C/EBP family members, suggesting C/EBPβ LIP as a potential oncogene [1, 2].
A highly conserved (from fish to man) small upstream open reading frame (uORF) in the 5′ mRNA region regulates alternative translation initiation of Cebpb at consecutive in frame start sites. Previous data showed that translation of the uORF restrains initiation of C/EBPβ LAP and causes resumption of ribosomal scanning and reinitiation at the downstream C/EBPβ LIP start site. The translational control and C/EBPβ isoform switching depends on mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling [3–6], stress response pathways [7], and RNA-binding proteins [8]. Briefly, at high activity of the translation initiation machinery the C/EBPβ LIP isoform is preferentially produced, whereas at low activity, the long C/EBPβ LAP isoform is preferentially produced [9, 10]. Recent evidences suggested that the C/EBPβ LAP/LIP ratio is an important indicator of C/EBPβ functions. Regulation of C/EBPβ LAP/LIP ratio plays a key role in liver regeneration, acute phase response, bone homeostasis, and mammary gland development [9, 10]. Enhanced expression of C/EBPβ was observed in human tumors, including mammary carcinomas [11–13], anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) [14–16], endometrial adenocarcinoma [17], ovarian [18], colorectal [19], liver [7], and skin cancer [20]. Among these, enhanced expression of the truncated C/EBPβ LIP isoform was reported in breast, ALCL, ovarian, and colorectal neoplasia. C/EBPβ LIP also supports metastasis survival in breast cancer [21] and pharmacological inhibition of C/EBPβ LIP expression reduced ALCL proliferation, implying a causal relationship between C/EBPβ LIP isoform expression and tumorigenesis [14].
Here, we used recombinant mouse genetics to explore whether deregulated expression of C/EBPβ LIP from its own genomic locus supports spontaneous tumor formation. A knockin mouse strain that expresses the C/EBPβ LIP isoform (LIP ki) developed tumors in multiple tissues of mesenchymal and epithelial origin, providing experimental evidence that enhanced translation reinitiation of C/EBPβ LIP is involved in tumorigenesis.
Materials and methods
Animals
The generation of Cebpb knockout (ko) and LIP ki mice have been previously described [9, 22]. The C/EBPβ ko and LIP ki mice were maintained on a 129 × C57BL/6 genetic background. Mice were fed with standard mouse diet and water ad libitium on a 12-h light-dark cycle. Animals were housed in a pathogen-free facility at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin. All procedures and animals experiments were conducted in compliance with protocols approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.
Histopathological analyses
Mice were sacrificed upon substantial decline in health (i.e., weight loss, paralysis, ruffling of fur, or inactivity) or obvious tumor burden. Tissues were fixed in buffered 4 % formaldehyde at 4 °C, dehydrated, and paraffin-embedded. Sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to standard procedures. To perform immunohistochemical (IHC) staining slides were immersed in sodium citrate buffer solutions at pH 6.0, heated in a high-pressure cooker for 5 min, rinsed in cold water, and washed in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and were then treated with a peroxidase-blocking reagent (Dako) before incubation for 1 h with the primary antibody for B220 (RA3-6B2, eBioscience) or cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175, Cell Signaling). Binding was detected by the Envision peroxidase kit (K4010, Dako) using diaminobenzidine as chromogenic substrate or by the streptavidin alkaline phosphatase kit (K5005, Dako). Sections were analyzed using an AxioPlan-2 microscope (Zeiss, Germany). Images were acquired using a Zeiss AxioCam Hr camera and AxioVision software version 4.2. For cleaved caspase-3 IHC analysis, per animal, five randomly chosen microscope fields were captured at ×200 magnification. The number of cleaved caspase-3-positive cells/field were counted and expressed as fold of control.
Cell culture and immunoblotting
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated from E13.5 embryos and spontaneously immortalized according to standard protocols. 3T3-L1 murine preadipocytes (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)) and MEFs were cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 % FBS (Invitrogen). Tissues, lymphomas, and cells were lysed with 8 M urea lysis buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot analysis using rabbit C/EBPβ antibody (C19, Santa Cruz) and mouse anti-α-tubulin (B-7, Santa Cruz) or mouse anti-β-tubulin (2-28-33, Sigma). Appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).
RNA preparation and microarray gene expression profiling
Total RNA from 5 C/EBPβ LIP heterozygous (+/L) and 5 wild-type (WT) lymphomas was prepared using the TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche) and analyzed on a 4 × 44K whole genome mouse microarray (Agilent Technologies). For normalization, quality control, and data analysis, the Bioconductor system was used (http://www.bioconductor.org) [23]. Raw microarray data from Agilent were first quantile normalized. For identification of differentially expressed genes, a linear model was fitted using limma. The fold change cutoff was set to 2 (FC = 2), and the P value cutoff was selected as 0.05. For functional analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using GSEA v2.0 algorithm (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea) [24] and the computed t-statistic from limma as pre-ranking. The following gene sets from MSigDB database (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea) were used: C2: curated sets, canonical pathways, Biocarta, KEGG, Reactome and C5: Go gene sets, BP: biological process. Only gene sets showing nominal P value ≤0.05 and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.25 were taken into consideration.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between groups were determined using the unpaired two-tailed Mann-Whitney’s test for the histographs and the log-rank test for the Kaplan-Meier curves. Both tests were performed using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Accession number
The raw microarray data were deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO accession number GSE53770).
Results
LIP ki mice are cancer prone
An excess of C/EBPβ LIP has been suggested to promote metastatic breast cancer by interfering with the TGFβ cytostatic pathway and/or by inhibition of anoikis [21, 25]. Moreover, expression of Cebpb LIP as a transgene under the whey acidic promoter led to mammary gland hyperplasia and rare neoplasia [26]. Although these experimental approaches have hinted at an oncogenic potential of C/EBPβ LIP, they did not reflect organismal constraints in quantitative, spatial, and temporal Cebpb regulation from its own locus.
To examine whether enhanced endogenous C/EBPβ LIP expression is involved in tumorigenesis, cohorts of 45 wild-type (+/+, WT), 52 C/EBPβ LIP homozygous (L/L), and 72 C/EBPβ LIP heterozygous (+/L) mice were monitored over a period of more than 25 months. Protein analysis confirmed expression of C/EBPβ LIP in the same tissues as C/EBPβ in WT mice (Fig. 1a). Figure 1b illustrates the survival of +/L and L/L mice as compared to their WT siblings. Median survival for WT mice was 24 months, versus 20 months for +/L, and 17 months for L/L mice. These results showed that deregulated expression of the C/EBPβ LIP isoform decreased survival in a dominant and dose-dependent manner.
At 20 months of age, a 3.5-fold increase in tumorigenesis was observed in L/L mice as compared to WT littermates (Table 1 and Fig. 1c). Histopathological analyses of the solid tumors of L/L mice revealed B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL, 25 % in L/L vs 9 % in WT), histiocytic sarcoma (HS, 5.8 % in L/L vs 0 % in WT), and lung adenocarcinoma (1.9 % L/L vs 0 % in WT) (Table 1 and Fig. S1).
Mice that express one WT Cebpb allele and Cebpb LIP from the second allele (+/L) reflect translational deregulated, enhanced endogenous C/EBPβ LIP expression. At 20 months of age, 37.5 % of the +/L mice had developed solid tumors, in comparison to 9 % of the WT mice (Table 1 and Fig. 1c). Compared to L/L mice, the incidence of B-NHL was slightly increased in +/L (32 % in +/L vs 25 % in L/L), yet the incidence of histiocytic sarcoma and lung adenocarcinoma remained similar (histiocytic sarcoma, 7 % in +/L vs 5.8 % in L/L; lung adenocarcinoma, 1.4 % in +/L vs 1.9 % in L/L) (Table 1). A cohort of Cebpb heterozygous (Cebpb +/−) mice were kept under the same conditions. Median survival was similar in both Cebpb +/− and WT littermates (cohort, 25 Cebpb +/+ and 27 Cebpb +/− mice; median survival, 24 and 25 months, respectively) and no tumor was found at 20 months of age (data not shown). Investigation of spontaneous tumor formation in Cebpb −/− mice was not possible due to occurrence of infection and severe skin wound phenotype before 1 year of age in more than 60 % of the mice. Altogether our data suggest that increase in C/EBPβ LIP is responsible for tumor development (as in +/L mice) but not a decrease in total C/EBPβ (as in Cebpb +/− mice).
B-NHL was found at high incidence in the LIP ki mice. As shown in Fig. 1d, LIP ki mice developed B-NHL significantly earlier than WT, although the 129 × C57BL/6 strain is known to be susceptible to B-NHL formation at old age [27]. Interestingly, expression of C/EBPβ, and in particular of the C/EBPβ LIP isoform, is high in lymphomas that develop in WT mice (Fig. 1e), in comparison to the spleens of young WT or LIP ki mice (Fig. 1a) and to the isolated CD19+ B cells (data not shown). Moreover, the tumor spectrum in +/L mice was broader than that in L/L mice and included T-lymphoma, carcinoma of the skin, liver, and mammary gland (Table 1 and Figs. 2, S2, S3, and S4). Note that C/EBPβ protein expression was detected in all tumor types (Figs. S1, S2, and S5). The generally low carcinoma incidence, however, may be masked by faster lymphoma development, as previously reported in other murine cancer models [28]. These data show that deregulated expression of C/EBPβ LIP from its own locus enhances tumor development in several mesenchymal and epithelial tissues.
Deregulation of cancer pathways in LIP ki mice
To determine which signaling pathways were altered in LIP ki mice tumors, B-NHL tumors obtained from LIP ki and WT mice were examined for cytogenetic alterations using SKY analysis (Table S1). No obvious gross genomic or recurrent rearrangements correlated with enhanced C/EBPβ LIP expression.
Next, gene expression profiling analysis revealed 123 genes as differentially expressed in lymphomas of +/L mice in comparison to lymphomas of WT mice (Fig. 3a and Table S2; 66 upregulated and 57 downregulated genes). GSEA and examination of leading-edge gene subsets identified enrichment of C2 and C5 functional sets in +/L mice that belong to mTOR pathways (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb). In addition to mTOR signaling, gene sets involved in translation and regulation of translation, mitochondrial function, metabolism, IGF1, and FOXO pathways, are all significantly enriched in lymphomas of +/L mice (Fig. 3b–e and Table S3). These data support the notion that elevated C/EBPβ LIP participates in metabolic signaling and mTOR regulated gene expression control during tumorigenesis.
In +/L lymphomas, GSEA highlighted three significant gene sets implicated in cell death signaling (Table S3). Moreover, the comparison between lymphomas of WT and +/L mice identified several gene sets involved in MAPkinase, ALK1, TGFβ, and NF-κB pathways that may affect apoptosis and that were significantly depleted in +/L lymphomas (Fig. S6 and Table S3). We also found that the number of apoptotic cells was slightly reduced in the spleen of +/L mice before tumor onset, whereas apoptosis rate was significantly increased in the spleen of Cebpb −/− compared to WT mice (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, reduction of caspase-3 cleavage was detected in CD19+ B cells and lymphomas from +/L, as compared to WT (Fig. 4b, c, respectively). Similar results were obtained with spleen and CD19+ B cells from L/L mice (data not shown). Altogether, these data suggest that increase in C/EBPβ LIP expression reduced the apoptotic rate in B cells and B-NHL.
Deregulation of immune defense might play a key role in tumorigenesis and several previous findings suggested C/EBPβ as an important transcription factor controlling cytokine and chemokine expression in immune cells. Deregulated gene expression comprised known C/EBPβ target genes, including Saa3, S100a9, Arg1, Fpr1, and Cxcl13 (Table S2 [29, 30]). Gene expression profiling showed that approximately 14 % of the deregulated genes in +/L lymphomas encoded cytokines/chemokines (Fig. 5a and Table S2). Moreover, the comparison between lymphomas of WT and +/L mice using GSEA revealed leading-edge gene subsets involved in cytokine and chemokine biosynthesis, Toll-like receptor pathways, and innate immune response (Fig. 5b–d and Table S3). Expression levels of leukocyte recruiting Ccl3 and Ccl4 cytokines involved in tumor cell eradication, inflammatory M1 type classically activated macrophages (Cxcl13, Cxcl14, Cxcl16, Cx3cr1), and dendritic cells (Cxcl16, Cd11c) markers were all decreased in lymphomas of +/L mice (Fig. 5a). In contrast, M2-activated macrophage markers were enhanced in lymphomas of +/L mice (Fig. 5a; Cd36, Arg1, Ccl24, Mrc1, Retnla, Ccl11, Cd163). These data suggest association of a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment in LIP ki lymphomas.
Collectively, expression profiling and pathway analysis of C/EBPβ LIP lymphomas revealed an increase in pro-tumorigenic cytokine release, deregulation of chemokine expression, and TLR signaling pathways, in addition to reduced apoptosis, that may all predispose and contribute to tumor susceptibility. This notion was further supported by recent evidence suggesting C/EBPβ as a critical regulator of myeloid derived suppressor cells that promote the pro-tumorigenic immunosuppressive microenvironment [31].
To test whether deregulated C/EBPβ LIP expression promotes lympho/myelo-proliferation, we performed bone marrow (BM) transfer of WT cells into lethally irradiated WT or L/L recipient mice (Fig. S7A). The distribution of hematopoietic cell lineages was different in WT BM reconstituted L/L and WT mice although engraftment of donor cells, and the spleen weights were similar in both recipient strains (Fig. S7B and C). An increase in myeloid cells (CD11b-positive cells) and a decrease in T cells (CD3-positive cells) were found in the spleens of WT BM reconstituted L/L mice, in comparison to WT BM reconstituted WT mice (B220-positive cells were not affected; Fig. S7D). In peripheral blood, white blood cells (granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes) of WT donor origin were higher in L/L than in WT recipient mice (Fig. S7E and F), but no changes in red blood cell counts were observed (Fig. S7G). These data suggest that enhanced expression of the C/EBPβ LIP isoform facilitates a tumor supportive microenvironment, but further experiments are required to determine how the microenvironment is actually altered in LIP mice.
Discussion
Data shown here firmly establish the proto-oncogenic function of endogenous C/EBPβ LIP in mesenchymal and epithelial tissues. Tumors were found in tissues previously shown to depend on C/EBPβ functions, including mammary gland, skin, liver, lung, and hematopoietic cells [15, 16, 30, 32–34]. Enhanced C/EBPβ LIP expression leads to the development of follicular lymphoma (B-NHL) and histiocytic sarcoma. Human follicular lymphoma may eventually transdifferentiate into histiocytic sarcoma, and C/EBPβ was found to be strongly expressed in these tumors [35]. C/EBPβ LIP has also been shown to promote proliferation of human B cell Hodgkin’s lymphoma and ALCL [14, 16], suggesting an important function of C/EBPβ LIP deregulation in lymphomagenesis and hinting at similarities in disease development in rodents and human.
C/EBPβ LIP is thought to antagonize the long isoforms C/EBPβ LAP*/LAP, other C/EBP members, and some bZIP factors [36, 37]. Accordingly, four scenarios can be envisioned to describe the effect of C/EBPβ LIP on gene expression: (i) C/EBPβ LIP acts alone, (ii) C/EBPβ LIP antagonizes other C/EBP family members or bZIP factors, (iii) C/EBPβ LIP antagonizes the LAP*/LAP isoforms of C/EBPβ, or (iv) ii and iii at the same time. C/EBPβ LIP heterozygous mice can reflect all four modes of action while L/L mice can affect (i) and (ii) but not (iii) and (iv). C/EBPβ LIP heterozygous mice develop a broader tumor spectrum and higher percentage of tumor incidence than L/L mice, suggesting that the oncogenic action of C/EBPβ LIP is mediated through antagonism of the C/EBPβ LAP*/LAP isoforms. However, L/L mice die significantly earlier than +/L mice and tumor types that might develop later in life (e.g., requiring more oncogenic events) will not be found in L/L mice. Similarly, analysis of spontaneous tumor formation in p53-deficient mice showed a wider tumor spectrum in p53 +/− mice as compared to p53 −/− mice [28]. These data suggest that dosage effects of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes may affect tumor development. Carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in LIP ki mice or combination with other murine oncogenic models will help to resolve the underlying molecular events in future experiments. Surprisingly and in contrast to the Cebpb −/− mice, L/L and +/L mice both do not show skin phenotypes, loss of hair, or reduced fat content (data not shown), suggesting that C/EBPβ LIP isoform functions are not reflecting simple loss of function phenotypes and go beyond inhibition of C/EBPβ LAP*/LAP or other C/EBPs members in the skin or fat. These observations support the notion that regulatory capacity by C/EBPβ LIP is context dependent and more complex that the four possibilities of action, as noted above. Nevertheless, it was important to first analyze spontaneous tumor formation in LIP ki mice and here, our data revealed the oncogenic potential of C/EBPβ LIP from its own locus in diverse tissues.
The long latency of tumor development in LIP ki mice suggests that additional oncogenic events are required in conjunction with C/EBPβ LIP deregulation. Cooperation of several proto-oncogenes and loss of tumor suppressor functions is a common explanation of tumor development. However, tumorigenesis was not accelerated in compound mice heterozygous for p53 deletion and C/EBPβ LIP deregulation, as compared to p53 heterozygous mice (data not shown). It therefore remains to be resolved which additional oncogenic events may accelerate tumor development in +/L or L/L mice.
The GSEA analyses indicated several altered pathways in lymphoma of LIP ki mice that relate to autonomous and non-cell autonomous effects on B cell lymphomagenesis. The structural features of Cebpb gene (lack of introns), however, render a conditional genetic approach rather difficult to experimentally resolve how C/EBPβ LIP supports oncogenesis. In contrast to Cebpa, no mutational alterations within the Cebpb coding region that affect the isoform expression have yet been reported. However, deregulation of C/EBPβ LIP expression may occur on the signaling/proteomic, rather than on the genomic level. In any case, our results show that tight regulation of the balance between long and truncated C/EBPβ isoforms is important for preventing tumor formation. Accordingly, the data imply that translational deregulation may dysbalance C/EBPβ isoform expression to contribute to tumorigenesis.
Previously, we have shown that the mTOR-TORC1 inhibitor rapamycin restricts upregulation of C/EBPβ LIP expression and lymphoma xenograft growth [3, 14]. Moreover, a translational control defective C/EBPβ mutant phenocopied mTOR inhibition and mTOR target genes were found to be coregulated by C/EBPβ and thus identified C/EBPβ as an important mediator of mTOR functions [9, 10]. Activation of mTOR promotes protein biosynthesis, translation reinitiation, M2 polarization, cell survival, and tumorigenesis [38, 39]. Deregulated mTOR signaling is evident in lymphomagenesis, and leukemogenesis and development of therapeutic strategies based on mTOR inhibition are currently under investigation [40, 40]. Lymphoma cells of C/EBPβ LIP heterozygous mice showed enrichment of rapamycin-sensitive genes, including FABP4 and adipokines that are thought to play an important role in tumorigenesis [41]. In addition, eIF-4E, a key factor of translation initiation that is regulated by the mTOR-sensitive 4EBPs also upregulates C/EBPβ LIP expression and promotes neoplasia [3, 42]. Our data therefore imply that pharmacologic interference with uORF-mediated C/EBPβ LIP translation initiation control may help to reestablish the balance between C/EBPβ isoforms and oppose deregulated mTOR signaling.
References
Wethmar K, Smink JJ, Leutz A (2010) Upstream open reading frames: molecular switches in (patho)physiology. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 32:885–893
Zahnow CA (2009) CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta: its role in breast cancer and associations with receptor tyrosine kinases. Expert Rev Mol Med 11:e12
Calkhoven CF, Muller C, Leutz A (2000) Translational control of C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta isoform expression. Genes Dev 14:1920–1932
Nardella C, Carracedo A, Salmena L, Pandolfi PP (2010) Faithfull modeling of PTEN loss driven diseases in the mouse. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 347:135–168
Ossipow V, Descombes P, Schibler U (1993) CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein mRNA is translated into multiple proteins with different transcription activation potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:8219–8223
Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM (2011) mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:21–35
Li Y, Bevilacqua E, Chiribau CB, Majumder M, Wang C, Croniger CM, Snider MD, Johnson PF, Hatzoglou M (2008) Differential control of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta) products liver-enriched transcriptional activating protein (LAP) and liver-enriched transcriptional inhibitory protein (LIP) and the regulation of gene expression during the response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 283:22443–22456
Timchenko NA, Wang GL, Timchenko LT (2005) RNA CUG-binding protein 1 increases translation of 20-kDa isoform of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta by interacting with the alpha and beta subunits of eukaryotic initiation translation factor 2. J Biol Chem 280:20549–20557
Smink JJ, Begay V, Schoenmaker T, Sterneck E, de Vries TJ, Leutz A (2009) Transcription factor C/EBPbeta isoform ratio regulates osteoclastogenesis through MafB. Embo J 28:1769–1781
Wethmar K, Begay V, Smink JJ, Zaragoza K, Wiesenthal V, Dorken B, Calkhoven CF, Leutz A (2010) C/EBPbetaDeltauORF mice–a genetic model for uORF-mediated translational control in mammals. Genes Dev 24:15–20
Dearth LR, Hutt J, Sattler A, Gigliotti A, DeWille J (2001) Expression and function of CCAAT/enhancer binding proteinbeta (C/EBPbeta) LAP and LIP isoforms in mouse mammary gland, tumors and cultured mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Biochem 82:357–370
Milde-Langosch K, Loning T, Bamberger AM (2003) Expression of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins C/EBPalpha, C/EBPbeta and C/EBPdelta in breast cancer: correlations with clinicopathologic parameters and cell-cycle regulatory proteins. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79:175–185
Zahnow CA, Younes P, Laucirica R, Rosen JM (1997) Overexpression of C/EBPbeta-LIP, a naturally occurring, dominant-negative transcription factor, in human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1887–1891
Jundt F, Raetzel N, Muller C, Calkhoven CF, Kley K, Mathas S, Lietz A, Leutz A, Dorken B (2005) A rapamycin derivative (everolimus) controls proliferation through down-regulation of truncated CCAAT enhancer binding protein {beta} and NF-{kappa}B activity in Hodgkin and anaplastic large cell lymphomas. Blood 106:1801–1807
Piva R, Pellegrino E, Mattioli M, Agnelli L, Lombardi L, Boccalatte F, Costa G, Ruggeri BA, Cheng M, Chiarle R et al (2006) Functional validation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase signature identifies CEBPB and BCL2A1 as critical target genes. J Clin Invest 116:3171–3182
Quintanilla-Martinez L, Pittaluga S, Miething C, Klier M, Rudelius M, Davies-Hill T, Anastasov N, Martinez A, Vivero A, Duyster J et al (2006) NPM-ALK-dependent expression of the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta in ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Blood 108:2029–2036
Arnett B, Soisson P, Ducatman BS, Zhang P (2003) Expression of CAAT enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBP beta) in cervix and endometrium. Mol Cancer 2:21
Sundfeldt K, Ivarsson K, Carlsson M, Enerback S, Janson PO, Brannstrom M, Hedin L (1999) The expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) in the human ovary in vivo: specific increase in C/EBPbeta during epithelial tumour progression. Br J Cancer 79:1240–1248
Rask K, Thorn M, Ponten F, Kraaz W, Sundfeldt K, Hedin L, Enerback S (2000) Increased expression of the transcription factors CCAAT-enhancer binding protein-beta (C/EBBeta) and C/EBzeta (CHOP) correlate with invasiveness of human colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 86:337–343
Oh HS, Smart RC (1998) Expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (C/EBP) is associated with squamous differentiation in epidermis and isolated primary keratinocytes and is altered in skin neoplasms. J Invest Dermatol 110:939–945
Gomis RR, Alarcon C, Nadal C, Van Poznak C, Massague J (2006) C/EBPbeta at the core of the TGFbeta cytostatic response and its evasion in metastatic breast cancer cells. Cancer Cell 10:203–214
Sterneck E, Tessarollo L, Johnson PF (1997) An essential role for C/EBPbeta in female reproduction. Genes Dev 11:2153–2162
Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES et al (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15545–15550
Li H, Baldwin BR, Zahnow CA (2011) LIP expression is regulated by IGF-1R signaling and participates in suppression of anoikis. Mol Cancer 10:100
Zahnow CA, Cardiff RD, Laucirica R, Medina D, Rosen JM (2001) A role for CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta-liver-enriched inhibitory protein in mammary epithelial cell proliferation. Cancer Res 61:261–269
Ward JM (2006) Lymphomas and leukemias in mice. Exp Toxicol Pathol 57:377–381
Harvey M, McArthur MJ, Montgomery CA Jr, Butel JS, Bradley A, Donehower LA (1993) Spontaneous and carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in p53-deficient mice. Nat Genet 5:225–229
Bonzheim I, Irmler M, Klier-Richter M, Steinhilber J, Anastasov N, Schafer S, Adam P, Beckers J, Raffeld M, Fend F et al (2013) Identification of C/EBPbeta target genes in ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) by gene expression profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation. PLoS One 8:e64544
Uematsu S, Kaisho T, Tanaka T, Matsumoto M, Yamakami M, Omori H, Yamamoto M, Yoshimori T, Akira S (2007) The C/EBP beta isoform 34-kDa LAP is responsible for NF-IL-6-mediated gene induction in activated macrophages, but is not essential for intracellular bacteria killing. J Immunol 179:5378–5386
Marigo I, Bosio E, Solito S, Mesa C, Fernandez A, Dolcetti L, Ugel S, Sonda N, Bicciato S, Falisi E et al (2010) Tumor-induced tolerance and immune suppression depend on the C/EBPbeta transcription factor. Immunity 32:790–802
Nerlov C (2007) The C/EBP family of transcription factors: a paradigm for interaction between gene expression and proliferation control. Trends Cell Biol 17:318–324
Nerlov C (2010) Transcriptional and translational control of C/EBPs: the case for “deep” genetics to understand physiological function. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 32:680–686
Ramji DP, Foka P (2002) CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins: structure, function and regulation. Biochem J 365:561–575
Feldman AL, Arber DA, Pittaluga S, Martinez A, Burke JS, Raffeld M, Camos M, Warnke R, Jaffe ES (2008) Clonally related follicular lymphomas and histiocytic/dendritic cell sarcomas: evidence for transdifferentiation of the follicular lymphoma clone. Blood 111:5433–5439
Newman JR, Keating AE (2003) Comprehensive identification of human bZIP interactions with coiled-coil arrays. Science 300:2097–2101
Vinson C, Myakishev M, Acharya A, Mir AA, Moll JR, Bonovich M (2002) Classification of human B-ZIP proteins based on dimerization properties. Mol Cell Biol 22:6321–6335
Chen W, Ma T, Shen XN, Xia XF, Xu GD, Bai XL, Liang TB (2012) Macrophage-induced tumor angiogenesis is regulated by the TSC2-mTOR pathway. Cancer Res 72:1363–1372
Menon S, Yecies JL, Zhang HH, Howell JJ, Nicholatos J, Harputlugil E, Bronson RT, Kwiatkowski DJ, Manning BD (2012) Chronic activation of mTOR complex 1 is sufficient to cause hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Sci Signal 5:ra24
Xu ZZ, Xia ZG, Wang AH, Wang WF, Liu ZY, Chen LY, Li JM (2013) Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: clinical significance and inhibitory effect of rituximab. Ann Hematol 92:1351–1358
Lee D, Wada K, Taniguchi Y, Al-Shareef H, Masuda T, Usami Y, Aikawa T, Okura M, Kamisaki Y, Kogo M (2014) Expression of fatty acid binding protein 4 is involved in the cell growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 31:1116–1120
Ruggero D, Montanaro L, Ma L, Xu W, Londei P, Cordon-Cardo C, Pandolfi PP (2004) The translation factor eIF-4E promotes tumor formation and cooperates with c-Myc in lymphomagenesis. Nat Med 10:484–486
Acknowledgments
We thank E. Sterneck for providing the Cebpb ko mouse strain; HP Rahn for help with flow cytometry; the radiology department of the Helios Klinikum for help with X-ray radiation; and C. Becker, J. Bergemann, A.V. Giese, P. Heinrich-Gossen, S. Jaksch, R. Leu, S. Spieckermann, and R. Zarmstorff for technical assistance. We are grateful to F. Rosenbauer and T. Müller for valuable discussions. This work was supported by the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (grant no. LEFF200708 to A.L.) and by the German Research Council (grant no. TRR-54 to A.L. and U.L.).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 31.1 MB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bégay, V., Smink, J.J., Loddenkemper, C. et al. Deregulation of the endogenous C/EBPβ LIP isoform predisposes to tumorigenesis. J Mol Med 93, 39–49 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-014-1215-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-014-1215-5