Abstract
This paper elicits the synthesis of twenty five 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole analogs (5a–5y) comprising thioether and ester linkages from aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes and benzyl 2-azidoacetates employing Cu(I) catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. Structures of synthesized compounds were elucidated by spectroscopic techniques like FTIR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS. Newly synthesized compounds were screened for in vitro antimalarial evaluation against P. falciparum strain and microbicidal potential against B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, and A. niger. Some of synthesized triazoles displayed moderate antimalarial activity against tested strain, while, the compounds 5i and 5n were found to exhibit significant inhibitory activity against most of the tested microbial strains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Malaria is one of the common prevalent fatal diseases caused by infection of protozoans parasites. Among the several species of plasmodium protozoans, P. falciparum is the most virulent form responsible for death of millions of people across the world. P. falciparum causes cerebral malaria which leads to abnormal behavior, convulsions and impairment of consciousness, whereas, crucial symptoms include severe anemia due to destruction of infected red blood cells. During the past few years, microbial infections are also increasing at an alarming rate in society. Emergence of increasing drug resistance against malarial parasite like P. falciparum and microbial infections prompted the researchers to design and synthesize new molecules which may prove as significant antimalarial/antimicrobial agent. In this scenario, N-heterocyclic compounds, especially triazole derivatives received considerable attention of organic chemists to explore their medicinal potentials particularly for malarial and microbial infections (Balabadra et al. 2017; Kaushik et al. 2014a; Zhang et al. 2015). Because 1,2,3-triazole derivatives have been found to possess various therapeutic properties like antimicrobial (Lal et al. 2012; Kaushik et al. 2014b, 2015, 2016a), anticancer (He et al. 2010; Singh et al. 2012; Kumbhare et al. 2014), anti-inflammatory (Vasilevsky et al. 2014), anticonvulsant (Karakurt et al. 2006), antiviral (Zhou et al. 2005), antioxidant (Dubey et al. 2015; Dügdü et al. 2016), antimalarial (D’hooghe et al. 2011), antihistaminic (Buckle et al. 1986), antitubercular (Gilla et al. 2008; Kumar et al. 2013), antiproliferative (Nagesh et al. 2015), anti-HIV (Whiting et al. 2006) etc.
Stability of 1,2,3-triazoles against metabolic degradation, oxidation, reduction, acidic and basic conditions, capability of hydrogen bonding and solubility in biological system facilitates these moieties for effective binding with biomolecular targets. (Horne et al. 2004; Ferreira et al. 2010) Moreover, substituted 1,2,3-triazole scaffolds also serve as versatile building blocks in synthesis of nucleosides (Jørgensen et al. 2011) and nucleotides analogs (Głowacka et al. 2012). Substituted 1,2,3-triazoles can be synthesized by Huisgen’s thermally induced 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, is the earliest known method leads to mixture of 1,4 and 1,5 regioisomers (Huisgen et al. 1967). However, highly accelerated Cu(I) catalyzed cycloaddition between terminal alkynes and azides invented by Sharpless and Meldal exclusively yields 1,4 disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles (Kolb et al. 2001; Tornфe et al. 2002; Friscourt and Boons 2010). This reaction emerged as one of the prime example of click chemistry as it is modular, selective, versatile, wide in scope and easy to perform. The click reaction has also found many applications in supramolecular chemistry and drug discovery (Banday et al. 2012).
In continuation to our previous work on synthesis and biological evaluation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole derivatives (Kaushik et al. 2016b), we report herein also, a series of expedient synthesis of thioether-ester linked 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles (5a–5y) from aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes and benzyl 2-azidoacetates via Cu(I) catalyzed click reaction. All the synthesized compounds were characterized by spectroscopic techniques Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 13C NMR spectroscopy, and high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). In vitro antimalarial potential against Plasmodium falciparum and antimicrobial potential against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger of synthesized triazoles were also accessed.
Materials and methods
Chemistry
All the starting materials and solvents used in present work were procured from Hi-Media, Alfa-Aesar, Sigma-Aldrich and were used without any further purification. Nutrient broth and Sabouraud dextrose broth used in antimicrobial evaluation were purchased from Hi-Media, Mumbai. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on readymade silica gel plates (SIL G/UV254, ALUGRAM) to examine the completion of reaction and visualization was achieved under ultraviolet (UV) light. Melting points (°C) of the synthesized compounds were measured by open capillaries and are uncorrected. The infrared (IR) spectra were obtained on SHIMAZDU IR AFFINITY-I FT-IR spectrophotometer in potassium bromide (KBr) powder and values were represented in cm−1. The 1H NMR spectra and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively on BRUKER AVANCE II 400 MHz spectrophotometer (chemical shift in δ, ppm). Values of coupling constant (J) were recorded in Hz. HRMS were recorded on Bruker micro TOF Q-II spectrometer.
General procedure for synthesis of thioether-ester linked 1–4 disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles (5a–5y)
Thioether linked terminal alkynes i.e., aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes (Kaushik et al. 2017) (2a–2e) were synthesized by reaction of aromatic thiols (1a–1e) (1.0 mmol) and propargyl bromide (1.0 mmol) with potassium carbonate (3.0 mmol) as base using N,N-dimethylformamide as solvent at 10–25 °C temperature with constant stirring for 5–6 h. Reaction was monitored by TLC. Upon completion of reaction, dilute hydrochloric acid was added to reaction mixture and compound was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). Organic layer was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure to get desired terminal alkynes (2a–2e).
Synthesis of benzyl 2-bromoacetates (4a–4e) were carried out by dropwise addition of bromoacetyl bromide (1.2 mmol) in the stirred solution of benzyl alcohols (3a–3e) (1.0 mmol) in acetonitrile in the presence of sodium bicarbonate (1.5 mmol) as base at 0–4 °C and continued stirring for 45 min. When the reaction was completed, reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 30 mL). Organic layer was evaporated under vaccum to obtain products (4a–4e) in good yield.
For the synthesis of triazole derivatives (5a–5y), benzyl 2-bromoacetates (1.0 mmol) (4a–4e) were dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide in round bottom flask and aqueous sodium azide (3.0 mmol) was added at 25–40 °C under stirring which was continued for 1 h. Afterwards, aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes (2a–2e) were added followed by aqueous copper sulfate pentahydrate (0.1 mmol) and sodium ascorbate (0.4 mmol), to above reaction mixture which was allowed to stirred for 8–18 h at same temperature. After the completion of reaction, ice cold water was added to the reaction contents and products were extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL), followed by washing with aqueous ammonia solution and then with saturated brine solution. Thereafter, organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain crude solid which was further recrystallized from chloroform to furnish pure compounds (5a–5y) in good yields.
Characterization of synthesized compounds (5a–5y)
Benzyl 2-(4-((phenylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5a)
White solid; yield: 82%; m.pt: 78–82 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3120 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2997 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1753 (C=O str., ester), 1639, 1457 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1209 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1053 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.25 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.12 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.20 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.18–7.36 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.88, 50.93, 68.01, 123.46 (C5 triazole), 126.53, 128.56, 128.77, 128.86, 129.02, 129.61, 134.52, 135.45, 145.65 (C4 triazole), 165.99 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H17N3O2S [M + H]+: 340.1075. Found: 340.1070.
4-Methoxybenzyl 2-(4-((phenylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5b)
White solid; yield: 93%; m.pt: 64–68 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3120 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2952 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1759 (C=O str., ester), 1611, 1480 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1212 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH 3 ), 4.25 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.09 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.14 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0Hz), 7.17–7.34 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.81, 50.92, 55.33, 67.98, 114.14, 123.41 (C5 triazole), 126.52, 126.64, 129.01, 129.52, 130.38, 135.32, 145.52 (C4 triazole), 160.03, 166.07 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H19N3O3S [M + H]+: 370.1181. Found: 370.1177.
4-Nitrobenzyl 2-(4-((phenylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5c)
White solid; yield: 84%; m.pt: 72–76 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3115 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2958 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1766 (C=O str., ester), 1603, 1480 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1519 (N–O asym. str., NO2), 1341 (N–O sym. str., NO2), 1219 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1057 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.39 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.17 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.25 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.17–7.47 (m, 8H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 8.21 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.63, 50.77, 66.26, 123.45 (C5 triazole), 123.95, 126.65, 128.65, 129.01, 129.61, 135.45, 141.37, 145.73 (C4 triazole), 147.97, 165.71 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H16N4O4S [M + H]+: 385.0926. Found: 385.0920.
4-Chlorobenzyl 2-(4-((phenylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5d)
White solid; yield: 93%; m.pt: 94–98 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3137 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3087 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2997 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1747 (C=O str., ester), 1616, 1469 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1225 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.24 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.12 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.15 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.18–7.32 (m, 9H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.85, 50.84, 67.12, 123.32 (C5 triazole), 126.53, 128.98, 129.02, 129.57, 129.92, 132.99, 134.86, 135.45, 145.66 (C4 triazole), 165.95 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H16ClN3O2S [M + H]+: 374.0730 (35Cl), 376.0701 (37Cl). Found: 374.0726 (35Cl), 376.0696 (37Cl).
4-Methylbenzyl 2-(4-((phenylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5e)
White solid; yield: 93%; m.pt: 98–102 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2991 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1758 (C=O str., ester), 1633, 1480 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1200 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1057 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.38 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.27 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.13 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.19 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.21–7.37 (m, 9H, Ar–H), 7.50 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.25, 28.84, 50.90, 68.00, 123.41 (C5 triazole), 126.52, 128.72, 129.00, 129.43, 129.64, 131.54, 135.48, 138.80, 145.63 (C4 triazole), 166.03 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H19N3O2S [M + H]+: 354.1232. Found: 354.1224.
Benzyl 2-(4-(((4-bromophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5f)
White solid; yield: 79%; m.pt: 86–90 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2991 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1750 (C=O str., ester), 1636, 1472 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1210 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.21 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.13 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.21 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.18 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.33–7.37 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 7.49 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.82, 50.89, 68.05, 120.57, 123.40 (C5 triazole), 128.56, 128.78, 128.88, 131.23, 132.10, 134.50, 134.55, 145.23 (C4 triazole), 166.01 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H16BrN3O2S [M + H]+: 418.0225 (79Br), 420.0204. (81Br). Found: 418.0220 (79Br), 420.0200 (81Br).
4-Methoxybenzyl 2-(4-(((4-bromophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5g)
White solid; yield: 86%; m.pt: 108–112 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3137 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3087 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2935 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1744 (C=O str., ester), 1611, 1475 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1222 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH 3 ), 4.21 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.10 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.15 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.18 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.27 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.37 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.48 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.09, 51.14, 55.46, 68.18, 114.38, 120.80, 123.58 (C5 triazole), 126.81, 130.73, 131.45, 132.28, 134.78, 145.37 (C4 triazole), 160.44, 166.27 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H18BrN3O3S [M + H]+: 448.0330 (79Br), 450.0310. (81Br). Found: 448.0326 (79Br), 450.0305 (81Br).
4-Nitrobenzyl 2-(4-(((4-bromophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5h)
White solid; yield: 84%; m.pt: 116–120 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3148 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3081 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2991 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1755 (C=O str., ester), 1611, 1474 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1516 (N–O asym. str., NO2), 1343 (N–O sym. str., NO2), 1227 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1052 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.23 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.20 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.30 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.19 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.37 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz) 7.47–7.49 (m, 3H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 8.23 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.72, 50.65, 66.24, 120.50, 123.29 (C5 triazole), 123.78, 128.61, 131.09, 131.82, 134.22, 141.28, 145.41 (C4 triazole), 147.96, 165.66 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H15BrN4O4S [M + H]+: 463.0076 (79Br), 465.0055. (81Br). Found: 463.0081 (79Br), 465.0062 (81Br).
4-Chlorobenzyl 2-(4-(((4-bromophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5i)
White solid; yield: 79%; m.pt: 102–106 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3154 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3077 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2924 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1743 (C=O str., ester), 1625, 1471 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1229 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1049 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.22 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.13 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.17 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.19 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.26 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.34–7.38 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.48 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.79, 50.87, 67.20, 120.55, 123.42 (C5 triazole), 128.95, 129.97, 131.27, 132.07, 132.94, 134.50, 134.86, 145.52 (C4 triazole), 165.93 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H15BrClN3O2S [M + H]+: 451.9835 (79Br and 35Cl), 453.9806 (81Br or 37Cl), 455.9785 (81Br and 37Cl). Found: 451.9830 (79Br and 35Cl), 453.9801 (81Br or 37Cl), 455.9779 (81Br and 37Cl).
4-Methylbenzyl 2-(4-(((4-bromophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5j)
White solid; yield: 83%; m.pt: 104–108 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3059 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2930 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1736 (C=O str., ester), 1625, 1474 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1232 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1049 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.36 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.21 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.11 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.17 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.17–7.23 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 7.37 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.48 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.46, 29.16, 51.09, 68.28, 120.50, 123.54 (C5 triazole), 128.98, 129.67, 131.52, 131.72, 132.28, 134.76, 139.06, 145.35 (C4 triazole), 166.19 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H18BrN3O2S [M + H]+: 432.0381 (79Br), 434.0361 (81Br). Found: 432.0376 (79Br), 434.0356 (81Br).
Benzyl 2-(4-(((4-chlorophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5k)
White solid; yield: 76%; m.pt: 86–90 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2991 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1751 (C=O str., ester), 1625, 1477 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1208 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.23 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.16 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.23 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.23–7.39 (m, 9H, Ar–H), 7.50 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.03, 50.88, 68.01, 123.31 (C5 triazole), 128.66, 128.73, 128.94, 129.02, 131.05, 132.74, 133.73, 134.31, 145.28 (C4 triazole), 165.99 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H16ClN3O2S [M + H]+: 374.0730 (35Cl), 376.0701. (37Cl). Found: 374.0726 (35Cl), 376.0699 (37Cl).
4-Methoxybenzyl 2-(4-(((4-chlorophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5l)
White solid; yield: 75%; m.pt: 95–99 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3148 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3081 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2958 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1751 (C=O str., ester), 1614, 1475 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1205 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH 3 ), 4.21 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.10 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.15 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.21–7.28 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.03, 50.80, 55.21, 67.84, 113.98, 123.21 (C5 triazole), 126.45, 128.91, 130.41, 131.01, 132.51, 133.68, 145.12 (C4 triazole), 160.00, 165.87 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H18ClN3O3S [M + H]+: 404.0836 (35Cl), 406.0806. (37Cl). Found: 404.0836 (35Cl), 406.0806 (37Cl).
4-Nitrobenzyl 2-(4-(((4-chlorophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5m)
White solid; yield: 88%; m.pt: 104–108 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3087 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2984 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1761 (C=O str., ester), 1605, 1478 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1517 (N–O asym. str., NO2), 1347 (N–O sym. str., NO2), 1204 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1052 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.22 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.20 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.30 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.21–7.27 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.47–7.49 (m, 3H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 8.23 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 29.05, 50.77, 66.36, 123.44 (C5 triazole), 123.99, 128.74, 129.16, 131.13, 132.70, 133.66, 141.44, 145.43 (C4 triazole), 148.01, 165.82 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H15ClN4O4S [M + H]+: 419.0581 (35Cl), 421.0551 (37Cl). Found: 419.0575 (35Cl), 421.0545 (37Cl).
4-Chlorobenzyl 2-(4-(((4-chlorophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5n)
White solid; yield: 83%; m.pt: 92–96 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3149 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3087 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2947 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1752 (C=O str., ester), 1611, 1477 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1208 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1052 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.21 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.13 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.16 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.24–7.35 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.97, 50.70, 67.04, 123.30 (C5 triazole), 128.87, 129.02, 129.82, 131.06, 132.59, 132.83, 133.67, 134.76, 145.16 (C4 triazole), 165.82 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C18H15Cl2N3O2S [M + H]+: 408.0340 (35Cl and 35Cl), 410.0311 (35Cl or 37Cl), 412.0282 (37Cl and 37Cl), Found: 408.0334 (35Cl and 35Cl), 410.0328 (35Cl or 37Cl), 412.0275 (37Cl and 37Cl).
4-Methylbenzyl 2-(4-(((4-chlorophenyl)thio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5o)
White solid; yield: 77%; m.pt: 98–102 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3138 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3087 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2930 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1749 (C=O str., ester), 1618, 1477 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1227 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.36 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.20 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.11 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.16 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.18–7.26 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.80, 29.01, 50.76, 67.48, 123.30 (C5 triazole), 128.59, 128.99, 129.30, 131.08, 131.37, 132.56, 133.69, 138.42, 145.00 (C4 triazole), 165.81 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H18ClN3O2S [M + H]+: 388.0887 (35Cl), 390.0857 (37Cl). Found: 388.0882 (35Cl), 390.0852 (37Cl).
Benzyl 2-(4-((p-tolylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5p)
White solid; yield: 91%; m.pt: 114–118 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3120 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3070 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2986 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1751 (C=O str., ester), 1607, 1475 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1210 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1052 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.30 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.20 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.12 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.20 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.07 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.33–7.36 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.45 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.90, 29.46, 50.75, 67.85, 123.38 (C5 triazole), 128.40, 128.63, 128.71, 129.66, 130.38, 131.50, 134.34, 136.68, 145.63 (C4 triazole), 165.90 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H19N3O2S [M + H]+: 354.1232. Found: 354.1226.
4-Methoxybenzyl 2-(4-((p-tolylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5q)
White solid; yield: 79%; m.pt: 88–92 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3126 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3076 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2935 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1756 (C=O str., ester), 1612, 1490 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1212 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.30 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH 3 ), 4.19 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.09 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.14 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.07 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.23–7.27 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.45 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.18, 29.76, 51.04, 55.53, 68.08, 114.35, 123.59 (C5 triazole), 126.92, 129.99, 130.69, 130.71, 131.79, 137.01, 146.05 (C4 triazole), 160.31, 166.26 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C20H21N3O3S [M + H]+: 384.1337. Found: 384.1333.
4-Nitrobenzyl 2-(4-((p-tolylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5r)
White solid; yield: 77%; m.pt: 110–114 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3126 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3014 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2919 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1751 (C=O str., ester), 1628, 1491 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1518 (N–O asym. str., NO2), 1345 (N–O sym. str., NO2), 1222 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.31 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.13 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.18 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.29 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.07–7.26 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 7.47 (s, 1H, C–H triazole), 8.23 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.07, 29.58, 50.75, 66.27, 123.37 (C5 triazole), 124.00, 128.69, 129.89, 130.33, 130.95, 137.31, 141.25, 146.83 (C4 triazole), 148.19, 165.81 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H18N4O4S [M + H]+: 399.1082. Found: 399.1075.
4-Chlorobenzyl 2-(4-((p-tolylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5s)
White solid; yield: 91%; m.pt: 104–108 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3137 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3092 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2952 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1752 (C=O str., ester), 1625, 1457 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1223 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.30 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.20 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.12 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.16 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.07–7.34 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 7.45 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.98, 29.41, 50.83, 67.11, 123.39 (C5 triazole), 128.98, 129.80, 129.92, 130.42, 131.58, 132.97, 134.85, 136.81, 145.86 (C4 triazole), 165.97 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C19H18ClN3O2S [M + H]+: 388.0887 (35Cl), 390.0857 (37Cl). Found: 388.0882 (35Cl), 390.0851 (37Cl).
4-Methylbenzyl 2-(4-((p-tolylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5t)
White solid; yield: 88%; m.pt: 104–108 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3120 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3070 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2919 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1759 (C=O str., ester), 1633, 1491 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1199 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1057 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.33 (s, 6H, CH 3 ), 4.23 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.13 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.19 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.11–7.25 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 7.48 (s, 1H, C–H triazole) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.25, 29.58, 50.90, 67.99, 123.45 (C5 triazole), 128.74, 129.43, 129.80, 130.50, 131.50, 131.59, 136.79, 138.84, 145.78 (C4 triazole), 165.97 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C20H21N3O2S [M + H]+: 368.1388. Found: 368.1381.
Benzyl 2-(4-((naphthalen-2-ylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5u)
White solid; yield: 79%; m.pt: 88–92 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3053 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2952 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1754 (C=O str., ester), 1625, 1496 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1208 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1052 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.34 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.07 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.15 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.29–7.47 (m, 9H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 7.71–7.75 (m, 4H, Ar–H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.73, 50.86, 67.92, 123.51 (C5 triazole), 125.92, 126.60, 127.27, 127.37, 127.60, 127.70, 128.55, 128.58, 128.75, 128.84, 131.94, 132.87, 133.71, 134.50, 145.49 (C4 triazole), 165.96 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C22H19N3O2S [M + H]+: 390.1232. Found: 390.1225.
4-Methoxybenzyl 2-(4-((naphthalen-2-ylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5v)
White solid; yield: 83%; m.pt: 94–98 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3143 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3053 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2958 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1755 (C=O str., ester), 1611, 1492 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1205 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1054 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH 3 ), 4.34 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.05 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.09 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 6.89 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.23–7.44 (m, 6H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 7.71–7.74 (m, 4H, Ar–H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.75, 50.89, 55.32, 67.87, 114.11, 123.48 (C5 triazole), 125.90, 126.59, 127.26, 127.37, 127.60, 127.69, 128.57, 130.44, 131.95, 132.88, 133.71, 134.50, 145.51 (C4 triazole), 160.07, 166.06 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C23H21N3O3S [M + H]+: 420.1337. Found: 420.1331.
4-Nitrobenzyl 2-(4-((naphthalen-2-ylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5w)
Light brown solid; yield: 79%; m.pt: 120–124 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3132 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3053 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2924 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1754 (C=O str., ester), 1633, 1499 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1521 (N–O asym. str., NO2), 1347 (N–O sym. str., NO2), 1222 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1057 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.38 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.17 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.24 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.29–7.51 (m, 6H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 7.71–7.76 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 8.23 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.61, 50.75, 66.24, 123.47 (C5 triazole), 123.93, 125.95, 126.64, 127.25, 127.44, 127.62, 127.70, 128.60, 128.64, 131.89, 132.77, 133.75, 141.39, 145.73 (C4 triazole), 147.98, 165.74 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C22H18N4O4S [M + H]+: 435.1082. Found: 435.1075.
4-Chlorobenzyl 2-(4-((naphthalen-2-ylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5x)
Light brown solid; yield: 89%; m.pt: 108–112 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3120 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3070 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2935 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1755 (C=O str., ester), 1619, 1491 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1218 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1060 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.35 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.09 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.11 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.21 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.32 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.41–7.47 (m, 4H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 7.71–7.78 (m, 4H, Ar–H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.87, 50.92, 67.19, 123.53 (C5 triazole), 126.02, 126.70, 127.33, 127.43, 127.66, 127.79, 128.68, 129.06, 130.01, 132.04, 132.90, 133.04, 133.80, 134.94, 145.73 (C4 triazole), 166.00 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C22H18ClN3O2S [M + H]+: 424.0887 (35Cl), 426.0857 (37Cl). Found: 424.0885 (35Cl), 426.0854 (37Cl).
4-Methylbenzyl 2-(4-((naphthalen-2-ylthio)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetate (5y)
White solid; yield: 80%; m.pt: 82–86 °C; FT-IR (KBr): 3120 (C–H str., triazole ring), 3070 (C–H str., aromatic ring), 2941 (C–H str., aliphatic), 1756 (C=O str., ester), 1624, 1499 (C=C str., aromatic ring), 1212 (C–O asym. str., ester), 1059 (C–O sym. str., ester) cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.34 (s, 3H, CH 3 ), 4.34 (s, 2H, SCH 2 ), 5.05 (s, 2H, NCH 2 ), 5.11 (s, 2H, OCH 2 ), 7.16–7.25 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.42–7.47 (m, 4H, Ar–H+C–H triazole), 7.71–7.75 (m, 4H, Ar–H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.37, 28.96, 51.11, 68.11, 123.72 (C5 triazole), 126.13, 126.82, 127.49, 127.60, 127.82, 127.92, 128.80, 128.95, 129.61, 131.74, 132.17, 133.10, 133.94, 139.04, 145.72 (C4 triazole), 166.27 (C=O ester) ppm; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C23H21N3O2S [M + H]+: 404.1388. Found: 404.1382.
General procedure for in vitro antimalarial evaluation
All the synthesized triazole derivatives (5a–5y) were screened for in vitro antimalarial activity in the Microcare laboratory & TRC, Surat, Gujarat.
The in vitro antimalarial assay was carried out in 96-well microtitre plates according to the micro assay protocol of Rieckmann and co-workers with minor modifications. (Rieckmann et al. 1978) The cultures of Plasmodium falciparum strain were maintained in medium RPMI 1640 supplemented with 25 mm HEPES, 1% d-glucose, 0.23% sodium bicarbonate and 10% heat inactivated human serum. The asynchronous parasites of Plasmodium falciparum were synchronized after 5% d-sorbitol treatment to obtain only the ring stage parasitized cells. For carrying out the assay, an initial ring stage parasitaemia of 0.8–1.5 at 3% hematocrit in a total volume of 200 µL of medium RPMI-1640 was determined by Jaswant Singh Bhattacharya (JSB) staining to assess the percent parasitaemia(rings) and uniformly maintained with 50% RBCs(O+). A stock solution of 5 mg/mL of each of the test samples was prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and subsequent dilutions were prepared with culture medium. The diluted samples in 20 µL volume were added to the test wells so as to obtain final concentrations (at five fold dilutions) ranging between 0.4 and 100 µg/mL in duplicate well containing parasitized cell preparation. The culture plates were incubated at 37 °C in a candle jar. After 36–40 h incubation, thin blood smears from each well were prepared and stained with Jaswant Singh Bhattacharya stain. (Singh 1956; Trager and Jensen 1976; Lambros and Vanderberg 1979; Desjardins 1984; Panjarathinam 2007). The slides were microscopically observed to record maturation of ring stage parasites into trophozoites and schizonts in presence of different concentrations of the test agents. The test concentration which inhibited the complete maturation into schizonts was recorded as the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Chloroquinine was used as the reference drug.
General procedure for in vitro antimicrobial evaluation
All the synthesized 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole derivatives (5a–5y) were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial potential against two gram-positive bacterial strains [B. subtilis (MTCC 441) and S. epidermidis (MTCC 6880)], two gram-negative bacterial strains [E. coli (MTCC 1652) and P. aeruginosa (MTCC 424)] and two fungal strains [C. albicans (MTCC 183) and A. niger (MTCC 8189)] by the serial dilution technique (Kaushik et al. 2016c). Ciprofloxacin and Fluconazole were used as reference drugs for bacterial and fungal strains, respectively. Firstly, the stock solutions of test compounds were prepared (2.0 mg in 10 mL DMSO) to attain the final concentration of 200 µg/mL concentration. Nutrient broth and Sabouraud dextrose broth were used as culture media for bacterial strains and fungal strains, respectively. One milliliter of sterile culture media was added in each test tube aseptically. Stock solution of test compounds were then serially diluted in test tubes containing sterile culture media to prepare the concentrations of 100–6.25 µg/mL followed by inoculation of 0.1 mL of respective microorganisms in each tube. After that, these test tubes were incubated at 37 ± 1 °C for 24 h in case of bacteria, 37 ± 1 °C for 48 h in case of C. albicans and 25 ± 1 °C for 7 days in case of A. niger. Reference drugs were also accessed under similar experimental conditions for comparison with synthesized compounds. Results were recorded visually in terms of MIC (µmol/mL).
Results and discussion
Chemistry
Synthesis of a series of thioether/ester linked 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles (5a–5y) has been outlined in Scheme 1. Firstly, the terminal alkynes i.e., aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes (2a–2e) (Kaushik et al. 2017) were synthesized by treatment of aromatic thiols (1a–1e) with propargyl bromide in the presence of potassium carobonate using N,N dimethylformamide as solvent, while benzyl 2-bromoacetates (4a–4e) were prepared by the reaction of benzyl alcohols (3a–3e) and bromoacetyl bromide using sodium bicarbonate as base in acetonitrile.
Afterwards, 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction was performed between aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes (2a–2e) and benzyl 2-azidoacetates (which were generated in situ from the reaction of benzyl 2-bromoacetates (4a–4e) with sodium azide) employing catalytic amount of copper sulfate pentahydrate and sodium ascorbate in dimethylformamide:water to afford the desired final products (5a–5y).
The structures of synthesized triazole derivatives (5a–5y) were well explicated by various spectroscopic techniques FTIR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR spectroscopy and HRMS. IR spectra of all these compounds reflects characteristic absorption bands in the region at 3115–3154 cm−1 (C–H, str., triazole ring) and 1736–1766 cm−1 (C=O str., ester). In 1H NMR spectra of most of compounds, a characteristic singlet was observed in the region at δ 7.45–7.50 attributed to triazolyl proton, while the appearance of another singlets in the region at δ 4.13–4.39 (SCH2), δ 5.05–5.20 (NCH2) and 5.09–5.30 (OCH2) also ensured the formation of target compounds. Other aliphatic and aromatic protons observed in expected regions. The salient feature of 13C NMR spectra of thioethereal triazole derivatives with ester functionality was the signals observed in the region at δ 165.66–166.27, δ 145.00–146.83, and δ 123.21–123.72 due to carbonyl carbon, C4 and C5 of the triazole ring, respectively. Another characteristic signals resonated in the region at δ 28.61–29.76, δ 50.65–51.14, and δ 66.24–68.28 assigned to the aliphatic carbon attached to sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen, respectively.
Further, the results obtained from high resolution mass spectral analysis were found in accordance to calculated values.
Antimalarial evaluation
The synthesized 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles (5a–5y) were accessed for in vitro antimalarial activity against strain i.e., Plasmodium falciparum as per the micro assay protocol of Rieckmann and co-workers with minor modifications (Rieckmann et al. 1978). Results are presented in terms of MIC in μmol/mL. Mean IC50 values were calculated from experiments performed in duplicate. Chloroquinine and quinine were used as reference drugs. It has been observed that some of the synthesized triazoles displayed considerable antimalarial inhibitory activity as reflected in Table 1. The compounds 5g (IC50, 0.1784) and 5h (IC50, 0.1835) showed good activity against P. falciparum. While, compounds 5i (IC50, 0.2032), 5k (IC50, 0.2086), 5n (IC50, 0.2082), 5t (IC50, 0.2041), and 5w (IC50, 0.2072) possessed almost similar average inhibitory activity against tested malarial strain.
Antimicrobial evaluation
All the synthesized triazole derivatives (5a–5y) were screened for in vitro antimicrobial activity against two gram-positive bacterial strains [Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus epidermidis], two gram-negative bacterial strains [Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa], and two fungal strains [Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger] by using serial dilution technique (Kaushik et al. 2016c). MIC were recorded in terms of μmol/mL. Ciprofloxacin and Fluconazole were used as reference drugs for antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively.
Results of antibacterial activity are revealed in Table 2. The synthesized triazole derivatives displayed moderate to good bactericidal activity against all tested bacterial strains. Some of the compounds like 5m (MIC, 0.0149), 5n (MIC, 0.0153), 5u (MIC, 0.0160), and 5w (MIC, 0.0144) against B.subtilis; 5h (MIC, 0.0135), 5i (MIC, 0.0138), 5n (MIC, 0.0153), 5s (MIC, 0.0161), and 5x (MIC, 0.0147) against S.epidermidis; 5d (MIC, 0.0167), 5f (MIC, 0.0149), 5g (MIC, 0.0139), 5i (MIC, 0.0138), 5m (MIC, 0.0149), 5n (MIC, 0.0153), and 5v (MIC, 0.0149) against E. coli; 5c (MIC, 0.0163), 5h (MIC, 0.0135), 5i (MIC, 0.0138), 5l (MIC, 0.0155), 5n (MIC, 0.0153), and 5r (MIC, 0.0157) against P. aeruginosa displayed appreciable bactericidal efficiency in comparison to reference drug used. Interstingly, compound 5n found to possess better antibacterial activity against all tested bacterial strains.
Results of antifungal evaluation are represented in Table 3. Most of the tested compounds exhibited average to good antifungal efficacy. Some of the compounds like 5c (MIC, 0.0163), 5f (MIC, 0.0149), 5i (MIC, 0.0138), 5n (MIC, 0.0153), and 5x (MIC, 0.0147) against C. albicans; 5c (MIC, 0.0163) and 5g (MIC, 0.0139) against A. niger found to possess better inhibitory activity as compared to standard drug. Moreover, antifungal evaluation is less prolific than antibacterial evaluation.
Structure–activity relationships (SAR)
From the antimalarial and antimicrobial results, following SAR may be inferred-
-
Antimalarial activity:
-
Compounds with 4-bromo/4-chloro substituted thiophenyl moiety exhibited better antimalarial activity in comparison to compounds having unsubstituted thiophenyl moiety.
-
Triazoles with thionapthyl moieties possess better inhibitory activity as compared to thiophenyl moiety.
-
Compounds having halogen group on thiophenyl as well as on benzyl moiety behave as better antimalarial agent.
-
Antimicrobial activity:
-
In most of cases, compounds containing electron withdrawing nitro group on benzyl ring displayed the improved bactericidal potency as compared to the compound without any substitution or substituted with electron releasing methoxy and methyl group on benzyl moiety.
-
Moreover, presence of halogen groups on thiophenyl/benzyl moiety of compounds enhanced inhibitory activity against tested bacterial strain.
-
In most of cases, triazoles having thionapthyl moieties displayed better antibacterial activity as compared to thiophenyl moiety.
-
Generally, synthesized compounds having methyl group on thiophenyl moiety exhibited better inhibitory activity against unsubstituted one among the tested bacterial strains.
-
In most of cases, presence of bromo group on thiophenyl moiety showed improved bactericidal activity than compounds with chloro substituted thiophenyl moiety.
-
Presence of halogen group on thiophenyl/benzyl moiety enhanced activity of some of compounds against C. albicans.
-
In most of cases, triazole derivatives with nitro group were found to be more potency against A. niger.
-
In case of A. niger, methoxy group present on benzyl group enhanced inhibitory activity than compounds with unsubstituted benzyl moiety, in most of cases.
Conclusion
Conclusively, we have synthesized twenty five thioethereal 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole analogs with ester functionality (5a–5y) through expedient and facile strategy of Cu(I) catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between aryl(prop-2-yn-1-yl)sulfanes and benzyl 2-azidoacetates in good yields. All the synthesized compounds were investigated for in vitro antimalarial and antimicrobial evaluation. Most of the synthesized triazole derivatives found to possess moderate antimalarial potential against Plasmodium falciparum strain. Whereas, the synthesized compound 5n exhibited overall encouraging efficiency against all tested microbial strains except A. niger. The compound 5i displayed better antimicrobial potency against all microbial strains except B. subtilis and A. niger.
References
Balabadra S, Kotni MK, Manga V, Allanki AD, Prasad R, Sijwali PS (2017) Synthesis and evaluation of naphthyl bearing 1,2,3-triazole analogs as antiplasmodial agents, cytotoxicity and docking studies. Bioorg Med Chem 25:221–232
Banday AH, Shameem AS, Ganai BA (2012) Antimicrobial studies of unsymmetrical bis-1,2,3-triazoles. Org Med Chem Lett 2:2191–2858
Buckle DR, Rockell CJM, Smith H, Spicer BA (1986) Studies on 1,2,3-triazoles(piperazinylalkoxy)-[1]benzopyrano[2,3-d]-1,2,3-triazol-9(1H)-ones with combined H1-antihistamine and mast cell stabilizing properties. J Med Chem 29:2262–2267
Desjardins RE (1984) In vitro techniques for antimalarial development and evaluation. In: Peters W, Richards WHG eds Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Springer, Heidelberg, p 179–200
D’hooghe M, Vandekerckhove S, Mollet K, Vervisch K, Dekeukeleire S, Lehoucq L, Latedgan C, Smith PJ, Chibale K, Kimpe ND (2011) Synthesis of 2-amino-3-arylpropan-1-ols and 1-(2,3-diaminopropyl)-1,2,3-triazoles and evaluation of their antimalarial activity. Beilstein J Org Chem 7:1745–1752
Dubey N, Sharma MC, Kumar A, Sharma P (2015) A click chemistry strategy to synthesize geraniol-coupled 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles and exploration of their microbicidal and antioxidant potential with molecular docking profile. Med Chem Res 24:2717–2731
Dügdü E, Ünlüer D, Çelik F, Sancak K, Karaoglu SA, Özel A (2016) Synthesis of novel symmetrical 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-bistriazole derivatives via ‘click chemistry’ and their biological evaluation. Molecules 21:659–672
Ferreira SB, Sodero ACR, Cardoso MFC, Lima ES, Kaiser CR, Silva Jr. FP, Ferreira VF (2010) Synthesis, biological activity, and molecular modeling studies of 1H-1,2,3-triazole derivatives of carbohydrates as r-glucosidases inhibitors. J Med Chem 53:2364–2375
Friscourt F, Boons GJ (2010) One-pot three-step synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles by copper-catalyzed cycloaddition of azides with alkynes formed by a sonogashira cross-coupling and desilylation. Org Lett 12:4936–4939
Gilla C, Jadhava G, Shaikha M, Kalea R, Ghawalkara A, Nagargoje D, Shiradkar M (2008) Clubbed [1,2,3] triazoles by fluorine benzimidazole: a novel approach to H37Rv inhibitors as a potential treatment for tuberculosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18:6244–6247
Głowacka IE, Balzarini J, Wróblewski AE (2012) Design, synthesis, antiviral, and cytotoxic evaluation of novel phosphonylated 1,2,3-triazoles as acyclic nucleotide analogs. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 31:293–318
He R, Chen Y, Chen Y, Ougolkov AV, Zhang JS, Savoy DN, Billadeau DD, Kozikowski AP (2010) Synthesis and biological evaluation of triazol-4-ylphenyl-bearing histone deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer agents. J Med Chem 53:1347–1356
Horne WS, Yadav MK, Stout CD, Ghadiri MR (2004) Heterocyclic peptide backbone modifications in an α-helical coiled coil. J Am Chem Soc 126:15366–15367
Huisgen R, Szeimies G, Moebius L (1967) 1.3-Dipolare Cycloadditionen, XXXII. Kinetik der Additionen organischer Azide an CC-Mehrfachbindungen. Chem Ber 100:2494–2507
Jørgensen AS, Shaikh KI, Enderlin G, Ivarsen E, Kumar S, Nielsen P (2011) The synthesis of double-headed nucleosides by the CuAAC reaction and their effect in secondary nucleic acid structures. Org Biomol Chem 9:1381–1388
Karakurt A, Ayetmir MD, Stables JP, Ozalp M, Kaynak FB, Ozbey S, Dalkara S (2006) Synthesis of some oxime ether derivatives of 1-(2-naphthyl)-2-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)ethanone and their anticonvulsant and antimicrobial activities. Arch Pharm Chem Life Sci 339:513–520
Kaushik CP, Kumar K, Lal K, Singh SK (2014a) Synthesis, characterization and microbicidal activity of some (1-substituted-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl benzoates. Chem Biol Interface 4:341–350
Kaushik CP, Kumar K, Narasimhan B, Singh D, Kumar P, Pahwa A (2016b) Synthesis, antimicrobial activity and QSAR studies of amide-ester linked 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles. Monatsh Chem https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-016-1766-y
Kaushik CP, Kumar K, Lal K, Narasimhan B, Kumar A (2016c) Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles containing benzofused N-heteroaromatic moieties. Monatsh Chem 147:817–828
Kaushik CP, Kumar K, Singh D, Singh SK, Jindal DK, Luxmi R (2015) Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial potential of some 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-bistriazoles. Synth Commun 45:1977–1985
Kaushik CP, Kumar K, Singh SK, Singh D, Saini S (2016a) Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles with aromatic ester functionality. Arab J Chem 9:865–871
Kaushik CP, Lal K, Kumar A, Kumar S (2014b) Synthesis and biological evaluation of amino acid-linked 1,2,3-bistriazole conjugates as potential antimicrobial agents. Med Chem Res 23:2995–3004
Kaushik CP, Pahwa A, Thakur R, Kaur P (2017) Regioselective synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of some thioether–amide linked 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles. Synth Commun 47:368–378
Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB (2001) Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed 40:2004–2021
Kumar K, Biot C, Kremer SC, Kremer L, Guérardel Y, Roussel P, Kumar V (2013) Base-promoted expedient access to spiroisatins: synthesis and antitubercular evaluation of 1h‑1,2,3-triazole-tethered spiroisatin−ferrocene and isatin−ferrocene conjugates. Organometallics 32:7386–7398
Kumbhare RM, Dadmal TL, Pamanji R, Kosurkar UB, Velatooru LR, Appalanaidu K, Rao YK, Rao JV (2014) Synthesis of novel fluoro 1,2,3-triazole tagged amino bis(benzothiazole) derivatives, their antimicrobial and anticancer activity. Med Chem Res 23:4404–4413
Lal K, Kumar A, Pavan MS, Kaushik CP (2012) Regioselective synthesis and antimicrobial studies of ester linked 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-bistriazoles. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22:4353–4357
Lambros C, Vanderberg JP (1979) Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol 65:418–420
Nagesh HN, Suresh N, Prakash GVSB, Gupta S, Rao JV, Sekhar KVGC (2015) Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel phenanthridinyl piperazine triazoles via click chemistry as anti-proliferative agents. Med Chem Res 24:523–532
Panjarathinam R (2007) Text book of medicalparasitology, 2nd Edition. Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, p 329–331
Rieckmann KH, Campbell GH, Sax LJ, Mrema JE (1978) Drug sensitivity of Plasmodium falciperum, an in vitro microtechnique. Lancet 1:221–223
Singh J (1956) J.S.B. stain: a review. Indian J Malariol 10:117–129
Singh P, Raj R, Kumar V, Mahajan MP, Bedi PM, Kaur T, Saxena AK (2012) 1,2,3-Triazole tethered b-lactam-chalcone bifunctional hybrids: synthesis and anticancer evaluation. Eur J Med Chem 47:594–600
Tornфe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M (2002) Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3] triazoles by regiospecific copper(i)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J Org Chem 67:3057–3064
Trager W, Jensen JB (1976) Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science 193:673–675
Vasilevsky SF, Baranov DS, Govdi AI, Sorokina IV, Tolstikova TG, Tolstikov GA, Alabugin IV (2014) Click chemistry on diterpenes: anti-inflammatory activity of the acetylenic derivatives of levopimaric acid and products of their transformations. ARKIVOC (v):145–157
Whiting M, Tripp JC, Lin YC, Lindstrom W, Olson AJ, Elder JH, Sharpless KB, Fokin VV (2006) Rapid discovery and structure–activity profiling of novel inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease enabled by the copper(i)-catalyzed synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles and their further functionalization. J Med Chem 49:7697–7710
Zhang HZ, Wei HZ, Kumar KV, Rasheed S, Zhou CH (2015) Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel d-glucose-derived 1,2,3-triazoles as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents. Med Chem Res 24:182–196
Zhou L, Amer A, Korn M, Burda R, Balzarini J, Clercq ED, Kern ER, Torrence PF (2005) Synthesis and antiviral activities of 1,2,3-triazole functionalized thymidines: 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition for efficient regioselective diversity generation. Antivir Chem Chemother 16:375–383
Acknowledgements
The authors are highly thankful to University Grants Commission, New Delhi for financial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaushik, C.P., Pahwa, A. Convenient synthesis, antimalarial and antimicrobial potential of thioethereal 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles with ester functionality. Med Chem Res 27, 458–469 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-2072-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-2072-x