Abstract
Biochar is a carbon-rich product, derived from the pyrolysis of biomass in the absence of oxygen. It is a widely accepted soil amendment for increasing the amount of soil carbon, nutrients, organic matter, enhancing population of soil microbes, soil retention and aeration capacity. Biochar can be produced using agriculture residues, plant biomass, and animal waste. Eichhornia crassipes is a high biomass producing aquatic plant used for a variety of purposes around the world. This review highlights the fabrication of biochar from E. crassipes biomass. The biochar produced from E. crassipes biomass bears good nutritive values and its application to the soil enhances agricultural crop productivity with improved soil health. The conversion of E. crassipes biomass in to biochar not only provides a significantly better alternative to chemical fertilizers but also a sustainable management strategy of this invasive plant species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The expanding population has led to depletion of natural resources with their increasing demands. This concurrent effect can decline the sustainable agricultural production and food security. For this, a variety of chemical synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and other products have been used for enhancement of crop yields. Nevertheless, these chemical fertilizers contain toxic metals which degrade the soil health with set of certain antagonistic reactions, as a result of which soil becomes degraded resulting in stressful conditions for plants. Therefore, with the excessive use of chemical and inorganic fertilizers, the agricultural yield and soil fertility declines. In this connection, some sustainable approaches have been investigated including organic farming, agroecology, agroforestry etc. (Nair et al. 2017). The utilization of natural substances or the products derived from them are found economically viable and environmentally sound, for not only enhancing the crop yield but also soil fertility. Biochar, a carbonaceous solid material, is one of these products which has good percentage of aromatization and strong anti-decomposition capabilities (Yuan et al. 2019). Moreover, it can be produced from various materials such as weeds, food wastes, timber debris, straw, rice shell, crop residues, etc., (Ding et al. 2016; Rehman and Razzaq 2017; Das et al. 2021; Jia et al. 2021). Biochar produced from organic biomass is quite a novel alternative to improve the soil fertility, agricultural yield, and organic matter, in order to prevent soil deterioration (Das et al. 2021; Jia et al. 2021). In many countries like India, Europe, China, Japan, and America, biochar is being used as an amendment for improving soil fertility (Gabhane et al. 2020).
Utilization of weeds especially high biomass producing species for production of biochar has become a novel tool due to its easy availability and cost-effective nature. The exponential growth of aquatic weeds has is of concern to both environment and ecologists (Zedler and Kercher 2004; Chamier et al. 2012; Brundu 2015). However, silver lining is that these species have been found to bear significant potential to be used for the preparation of biochar. Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) is a major exotic weed, well known for its obstinate growth around the water bodies. Hence, it can severely affect the biodiversity, nutrient cycle, and water quality. Resultantly, numerous physical, chemical and mechanical techniques have been suggested to suppress growth of this invasive weed but the incurring expenditure becomes a snag to it. On the other hand, these techniques remain unsatisfactory in genuinely managing the problem, regardless of being a cause of multiple environmental dilemmas (like increase in pollutant load, heavy metals, etc.) (Gao and Li 2004). Besides the drawbacks, aquatic invasive species also possesses evident qualities like, high biomass, improved metabolic properties, superior tolerance level, and greater efficiency to decontaminate the water. Thereby, to control the load on environment due to the invasion, a new and sustainable approach is gaining a great deal of attention throughout the globe. Bio-waste valorization, which facilitates conversion of waste-biomass into eco-friendly bio-products is now becoming important to tackle to utilise the waste biomass (Abosede et al. 2017; Ahmed et al. 2020; Ulusal et al. 2020). Eichhornia biomass can be a good alternative source and can be utilized in many possible ways such as in phytoremediation, preparation of compost or vermicompost, manure, biochar, paper, board and energy production, due to its rich cellulosic properties (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin content), and higher biodegradability when disposed directly into the soil (Wilson et al. 2005; Cai et al. 2017; Sindhu et al. 2017). Also, due to rapid and high biomass producing potential, it has considerable ability of carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration (Spokas et al. 2012; Gupta et al. 2020). These alternatives can be useful as low-cost operation, waste minimization, economical, ecological and societal development (Ban et al. 2019; Kwon et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020).
So, during the process of biochar production, cellulosic carbons in water hyacinth biomass can be converted into stable aromatic carbons, which may help in attracting the soil particles through decomposition process and increasing the soil carbon content. Meanwhile, several scientific studies have proved that biochar has a greater role in enrichment of soil properties (Ding et al. 2016; Rehman and Razzaq 2017). Thus, the present review is aimed to explore the potential, characteristics and production methods of biochar from E. crassipes. The application of biochar in agroecosystems and their effects on soil fertility parameters, plant growth and yield are also discussed.
Eichhornia crassipes: a recalcitrant alien weed
E. crassipes (water hyacinth), an exotic free-floating perennial vascular aquatic plant, is known for its impetuous growth all around the world coupled with serious ecological and socio-economic changes to the ecosystem (Center et al. 1999). It belongs to family “Pontederiaceae” and is native to Amazon basin of tropical and sub-tropical South America. It reproduces both sexually and asexually (Mitchell 1985) however, for the prolific growth and reproduction of water hyacinth, high nutrient concentrations and optimum temperature are deemed as the strongest factors (Wilson et al. 2005). In contrast to other emergent macrophytes, water hyacinth is not confined to shallow water because of its free-floating root system. It has nearly invaded in around 50 countries on different continents and, may expand to top-level latitudes as temperature rises due to increased green house gas emissions and climate change (Rodriguez-Gallego et al. 2004; Hellmann et al. 2008; Rahel and Olden 2008). E. crassipes is pervasive across Southeast Asia, the Central and Western Africa, the Southeastern United States and Central America (Fig. 1) (Brendonck et al. 2003; Lu et al. 2007; Téllez et al. 2008; UNEP 2013). The accelerated growth of water hyacinth affects the drainage systems and irrigation patterns, spread the pathogens, alters the quality of water and hydropower and water supply ways, sabotage water transport, obstructs the canals and rivers causing floods, lowers the dissolved oxygen of water, and reduces the aesthetic value of tourist places (Singh 2005; Martinez-Jimenez and Gomez-Balandra 2007). Irrespective of the adverse impacts, water hyacinth also possesses some benefits, it can be used in traditional medicines, biogas production, as mushroom bedding material, carbon black production, making of ropes, production of fiber boards, as animal fodder and fish feed, green manure, compost, biochar and as an ornamental plant (Abosede et al. 2017; Ahmed et al. 2020; Ulusal et al. 2020).
Biochar (BC): an environmental medicament
Biochar is rich in active organic clusters and aromatic configurations with reasonably high cation exchange capacity, optimum pH, extensive surface area, and negative surface charge (Chan et al. 2007; Li et al. 2016a, b; Cheng et al. 2020). As described in Fig. 2 biochar application enhances the soil organic matter and soil enzymes, stimulates soil microbial population, aids in improved water holding capacity, limits the leaching behavior of chemically derived fertilizers, promotes soil aeration, stretches the retention time of nutrients and increases soil stress tolerance capacity and other environmental problems as well (Amonette and Joseph 2009; Cao and Harris 2010; Chen and Yuan 2011; Jiang et al. 2012). Also, biochar has higher adsorption potential due to its greater surface area, when added to contaminated sites (Zhao et al. 2019). Moreover, the biochar can act as pH regulator of the soil, as a result of which, soil retains high moisture to immobilize the metals released from chemical fertilizers (Renner 2007; Kumar et al. 2018). Microstructure of the biochar is a captivating material to stimulate the bio-availability of toxic pesticides or herbicides. The effects and behavior of biochar depends on adsorption or desorption, degradation and bio-accessibility in the soil along with leaching of chemical pollutants (Manyà 2012; Zhang et al. 2012; Safaei Khorram et al. 2016; Cai et al. 2017). Higher proportion of carbon can be sequestered and confiscated for a longer period in the soil by application of biochar (Kuhlbusch 1998; Kuhlbusch et al. 1996; Lehmann et al. 2005; Nguyen et al. 2009). Biochar has the ability to mineralize the complex components including pollutants through both biotic (Hamer et al. 2004; Kuzyakov et al. 2009) and abiotic mechanisms (Liang et al. 2008; Nguyen and Lehmann 2009). All these factors and conditions (mentioned above) are favorable for better plant growth and productivity (Jha et al. 2010; Kalus et al. 2019; Sánchez-Reinoso et al. 2020). Regardless of the adequate environmental benefits, the biochar commercialization stumbled due to the higher expenses involved in its manufacturing. This major hindrance can be alleviated by using cheap and locally available raw materials for its production (like, weeds and other biowaste materials) (Uchimiya et al. 2010; Masto et al. 2013; Li et al. 2016a, b; Gaurav et al. 2020). The employment of biomass waste valorization to obtain biochar and other valuable products from invasive weed species (like E. crassipes) can be a great initiative and may be an important plan for the suitable management and utilization of the invasive weeds (Masto et al. 2013; Li et al. 2016a, b; Gaurav et al. 2020).
Recently, the production of biochar using plant biomass has gained a lot of interest in the scientific community; however, it can be produced in a variety of ways, including thermochemical and biochemical methods. Therefore, converting biomass to biochar can improve the carbon storage and soil fertility, forging the previously known recalcitrant weed to a valuable resource. Biochar assimilation into agricultural soil has recently encouraged much scientific research for agronomic, financial and ecological benefits. Pyrolysis of feedstock at various temperatures under oxygen-limiting conditions has shown the effects and efficiency of biochar (Khan et al. 2013; Uchimiya et al. 2011). In addition, several types of feedstock have been used for biochar production such as rice straw, wood, corn stover, rice husks, bamboo, wheat straw, peanut shells, poultry litter, and animal manures (Adekiya et al. 2020; Azeem et al. 2019; El-Naggar et al. 2018; O’toole et al. 2018; Paetsch et al. 2017; Muhammad et al. 2017; Naeem et al. 2017) (Table 1). There are some common methods for biochar production which have been discussed below.
Incineration or combustion
Incineration or combustion is the oldest methodology being used to extract energy from plant biomass without any chemical processing. Biomass can be used to produce heat in the presence of air at temperature set between 800 and 1000°C leaving ash (McKendry 2002; Tripathi et al. 2016). However, the remaining ash can be utilized in degraded land for soil reclamation. Huang et al. (2016) studied that combustion of water hyacinth released various gaseous emissions like CO2, NO2, SO2 and methane without pretreatment. However, the pretreatment of biomass feedstock prior to combustion improves process efficiency and suppresses overall process expenses (Goyal et al. 2008).
Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis is the most promising technique being employed to convert waste into useful biochar, liquid and gas. In this process, with the increase in temperature, the quality of biochar and surface structure of particles may get affected (Gogoi et al. 2017; Gopal et al. 2019). Generally, pyrolysis is of two major types i.e., slow pyrolysis and fast pyrolysis. The fast pyrolysis easily decomposes the waste materials and produces gases, aerosol particles and biochar. This process includes high heating, less reaction time, temperature of 500ºC or more, quick char product removal and fast cooling of vapors. Apart from these, the constituent product is bio-oil obtained from dry biomass along with biochar and gas. It is a rapid process that ends within seconds. In this process the yield is indicated as 60% of bio-oil, 20% of biogas and 20% of syngas (Huang et al. 2016; Dai et al. 2017). Whereas, the slow pyrolysis is categorized by slow heating rates, more solid materials and less temperature i.e., 400°C or less as compared to fast pyrolysis. In case of slow pyrolysis, biochar is the prime product (35–45%) together with other products as bio-oil (25–35%) and syngas (20–30%) (Verma et al. 2012; Lai et al. 2013; Méndez et al. 2015). The solid fraction (biochar) product is quite evident during the process with certain volume of liquid and gas products from wet biomass upto 75 wt% (Bridgwater et al. 1999; Amutio et al. 2012). Some researchers observed that pyrolysis is the best method for the conversion of any biomass waste materials such as rice straw, wheat straw, sawdust, flax straw, bamboo biomass, etc., into biochar (Azargohar et al. 2013; Xiao and Yang 2013) (Table 2). Several authors demonstrated that the differences in pyrolysis temperature induces substantial variations in the chemical structure and biochar composition (Li et al. 2006; Scott and Glasspool 2007; Asadullah et al. 2010), that may essentially elucidate the importance and variances in biochar stability and the carbon mineralization process in the soil (Baldock and Smernik 2002; Nguyen and Lehmann 2009).
Gasification
Gasification, a thermo-chemical process, is carried out to produce the gaseous fuels and stable carbonaceous biomass at temperature of around 700–900°C in presence of nitrogen, air and CO2 (Reddy et al. 2014; Tripathi et al. 2016). With reference to other methods, gasification discards larger volume of syngas along with diminutive emissions. Hydrogen is the primary yield of this process, though a sizeable amount of biochar is also produced (Guan et al. 2016). During this process, an internal heat transfer within particles increases the native temperature of biomass that carries off the removal of water and aids the steady release of pyrolytic volatiles. Although the biomass elements decompose at different temperatures but the entire decomposition ceases within the temperature range of 400–500°C, where biochar is the minute product. To obtain the higher energy efficiency with minimum feedstock, particle size is increased that simultaneously increases the operational cost. On the other hand, an increase in feed particle size decreases the milling costs but increases the residence time and fixed cost (Luo et al. 2009; Al-Rahbi and Williams 2017).
Hydrothermal carbonization
Basically, the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process is an effective and eco-friendly technique with the temperature range of 180–350°C (Sevilla and Fuertes 2009) where water is used as reaction medium above the saturation pressure. The HTC process is comparatively cleaner and hazard free method due to water as the individual reaction medium under pressure and heat. The HTC is operated in very complex pressurized rotary drums, kilns and stoves which make it a cost bearing process (Hoekman et al. 2011). During the production of biochar through carbonization process at temperature range of 450–550°C, a considerable volume of yield was obtained. So, the researchers emphasize on the temperature variations in slow pyrolysis and lignin decomposition (Cornette et al. 2018). Though the yield of biochar decreases with temperature and time variations but, the biochar carbon stability increases with temperature variations. When compared with other methods, HTC produces biochar that retained nutrients like N and P, which can be supportive in regaining soil fertility. Also, HTC proves to be advantageous over other methods in terms of reduction in O/C ratio, higher calorific value, and increased hydrophobicity (Libra et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2013).
Nevertheless, the production of biochar from plant biomass is usually triggered through energy conversion processes. Moreover, amongst the above-mentioned processes, pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization are most suitable and practical alternatives for the extraction of biochar as mentioned in Table 2. Even, complete combustion of plant biomass in absence of oxygen takes place in both the processes (Masto et al. 2013; Ding et al. 2016; Nyamunda et al. 2019). For both the methods, the end product is biochar along with a little amount of syngas and biofuel but, the portion of biochar is comparatively larger. However, the amount of biochar produced depends on the processing conditions such as temperature, duration, biomass sources, etc. A large variety of biomass feedstock such as wood, manure, grasses, invasive plants, crop residues, can be utilized for volarizing into biochar (Xu et al. 2020). Even, the types of biomass can also distort the efficiency and effectiveness of produced biochar (McLaughlin et al. 2009) and the characterization of biochar may be helpful for soil amendment in terms of crops and forest productivity.
Potential utilization of E. crassipes biomass for valorization into biochar
E. crassipes is a nitrogen rich plant species (up to 3.2% of dry matter) and C/N ratio is 1:5 suggesting good content of organic matter in the plant (Gunnarsson and Petersen 2007). Also, it is a rich source of minerals and can serve as suitable economic feed for the production of biochar. In a study, it has been found that dry matter of water hyacinth consists of 5.2% N, 0.22% P, 2.3% K, 0.36% Ca, 280 ppm of Fe, 45 ppm of Zn, 2 ppm of Cu and 332 ppm of Mn (Lata and Veenapani 2011). Similarly, in some other studies, it was observed that the use of water hyacinth biochar enhanced the consistency of carbon, organic matter and water holding capacity of the soil (Bordoloi et al. 2018; Cornette et al. 2018; Gopal et al. 2019). In view of the above characteristics, water hyacinth emerges out as righteous choice for the production of biochar. Biochar produced through pyrolysis of water hyacinth biomass effectively removes carbon from the atmospheric carbon cycle and transfers it to long-term storage in soil as a result of which the plants have higher carbon–nitrogen percentage (i.e., 1:24.3) (Jafari 2010).
Characterization of biochar produced from water hyacinth biomass
For the production of biochar, the determining components are organic carbon, nitrogen, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, etc. However, the characterization of the produced biochar needs to be accomplished prior to its application into the soil as amendment for further suitability. The yield of biochar was determined as the ratio between the dry weight of Eichhornia and the obtained biochars (Thermo Scientific Flash 2000). As the yield decreases with elevating temperature in pyrolysis, the pH contrastingly increases from 7.98 to 11.54 with the rise of temperature from 300 to 700°C. Also, the carbon content grows from 47.17 to 51.34%, while there is a considerable decrease in oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen contents from 47.13 to 46.83%, 0.73 to 2.12%, and 1.10 to 3.580% respectively (Walkley and Black 1934; Pereira et al. 2011; Masto et al. 2013). Even, the surface polar functional groups curtail thereby signifying decrease in the (O + N)/C ratios with the pyrolysis temperature (Cantrell et al. 2012). Likewise, the H/C and O/C ratios of the Eichhornia biomass and biochar are 1.71 and 0.78 and 0.85 and 0.33 respectively, this decrease in values indicates high degree of aromaticity in resultant biochar (Feng et al. 2017). Masto et al. (2013) found that the biochar produced at 300°C is thermally more stable than that produced at 500°C, which states that loss of organic matter is quite lower for biochar at 300°C as against biochar at 500°C. For this reason, biochar at 300°C is more effective for soil amendment motive in relation to biochar produced at 500°C. Also, the puffy surfaces are clearly visible in scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. This process increases the surface area and porosity in the resultant biochar. So, considering biochar application into the soil, these two features are useful in boosting nutrient retention, improving water holding capacity, magnifying soil organisms and intensifying fertilizer use efficiency. The results of SEM–EDX (Energy dispersive X-ray analysis) of some studies reveal the composition of water hyacinth biochar particles, where, the prime elements found were C, O2, K, Cl, P, Na, Fe, Ca, Mg and Si (Masto et al. 2013; Mosa et al. 2018; Abd et al. 2018) and varied according to the types of biomass feedstock (de la Rosa et al. 2014). In another study, the maximum contents of P, K and Mg (4.3, 9.9 and 2.8 g/kg, respectively) were detected in the biochar obtained at 500°C temperature, whereas the 400°C temperature the result was confined to maximum contents of C and N (73.6% and 1.9%, respectively) (Saletnik et al. 2016). Out of which, K has a major role in influencing biochar formation as it promotes dissolution of cellulosic compounds and also affects the thermal stability (Zhou et al. 2009). Bottezini et al. (2021) characterized water hyacinth biochar using 13C and 31P NMR spectroscopy and found that the formed extractable phosphorus, mainly orthophosphate at 400°C, contains 60 mg kg−1 of extractable P, and 0.83% of total P. They have also found that aromaticity of produced biochar increased from 52 to 79% with pyrolysis temperature which is very promising for a soil P-supplier.
Effects of water hyacinth biochar on soil and plant productivity
Utilization of Eichhornia biomass for making of biochar is proved to be low-cost and environment-friendly biotechnological application (Lahori et al. 2017). The biochar is applied for various purposes such as soil quality improvement, wastewater treatment, climatic chaos mitigation, waste minimization and management (Lehmann and Joseph 2009; Li et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2017; Mosa et al. 2018). However, biochar can enhance the soil properties along with soil fertility and nutrient contents, especially by reducing the leaching of nitrate, phosphate and other anionic nutrients, improving the soil structure and soil–water capacity and enhancing the soil microbiological properties (Wilson 2014; Petersen-Rockney 2015; Blanco-Canqui 2017). Meanwhile, the greater availability of nutrient to crops can be made more efficient, if the biochar is supplemented with various types of soil amendments like compost, manure, cow dung, press mud or synthetic fertilizer. Masto et al. (2013) reported that application of water hyacinth biochar substantially increased soil microbial activity (around three times in active biomass) as well as soil respiration. Similar kind of results were also observed by Gorovtsov et al. (2019) where they found that large fungal colonies were developed after the application of biochar into the soil. According to Jafari (2010) water hyacinth biomass can be used as an efficient soil amendment because it contains up to 75.8% organic matter, 1.5% nitrogen, and 24.2% ash, as well as 28.7% K2O, 1.8% Na2O, 12.8% CaO, 21.0% Cl, and 7.0% P2O5.
The application of biochar in soil has a great potential to improve soil quality as well as sequester carbon at the same time (Verheijen et al. 2009). Many studies showed that application of biochar increased crop productivity, improved water quality, minimized nutrient leaching rate, reduced soil acidity, increased water holding capacity and minimized the use of fertilizers. However, all these conditions are favorable for better plant growth and productivity, as described in Table 3. Masto et al. (2013) reported that application of biochar derived from water hyacinth biomass aids in salubrious growth of Zea mays seedlings. Oladele (2019) in his observation found that using Eichhornia biochar on rice cultivation at 3–6 tons ha−1 significantly (P ˂ 0.05) increased grain yield by 46% and straw yield by 47%. Similarly, Najmudeen et al. (2019) in their study observed higher yield in crops cultivated in the soil applied with 4% of Eichhornia biochar than in controlled conditions. Along with higher yield, there was remarkable increase in the growth of plant shoots and roots. Biochar derived from water hyacinth also regulates heavy metal pollution in soil, paving the way for large-scale utilisation of water hyacinth resources (Yin et al. 2016). Likewise, Eichhornia biochar can be used as a soil amendment to reduce heavy metal and phytotoxicity because of its high surface area, broad surface functional group, and interlocking patterns of its particles (Xu et al. 2020). Bordoloi et al. (2018) examined the efficacy of water hyacinth biochar for improving soil fertility and metal adsorption.
Comparison of E. crassipes biochar with other plant biomass biochar
E. crassipes is an invasive plant, thus there is need of advance research in this field to control its growth and management of its biomass that includes production of biochar for soil as well as water remediation, and use as catalyst in restoration of environmental issues (Zheng et al. 2016). With recent technological advancements, it is possible to convert the biomass of this aquatic weed into biochar, biomethane, biohydrogen, and absorbent for remediation of pollutants crack propagation (Feng et al. 2017; Zheng et al. 2016; Bordoloi et al. 2019). The application of water hyacinth biochar for soil remediation, of oil and and other pollutants retains more water than soil not amended with biochar under both saturated and drought conditions. In a study, Muigai et al. (2021) found that the biochar made from water hyacinth, yellow oleander, and sugarcane bagasse can also be used as an additional carbon source in agronomy, increasing soil mineral content and maintaining pH. They have suggested that biochar derived from water hyacinth can be used as a supporting matrix for the synthesis of-stable bio-composites due to its increased surface area. Besides, the gradual addition of biochar to soil subsequently decreases the crack intensity factor (CIF) potential from 7 to 2.8% in soil (Bordoloi et al. 2018). Yin et al. (2016) observed that biochar derived from water hyacinth, when incorporated at 2% (w/w) showed substantial and persistent reduction of cadmium mobility from soil (used for paddy cultivation) in comparison with biochar made from rice straw. Hence, many studies have proven that biochar obtained from water hyacinth biomass can be effective in mitigating several issues of soil and environment.
Conclusion and future perspectives
From the aforementioned debate, it is quite evident that the conversion of E.crassipes (water hyacinth) biomass into biochar could possibly be a good alternative in managing and utilizing the biomass of such invasive weed. Water hyacinth is a well-suited candidate for fabrication of biochar due to its higher content of C-N and rich source of minerals like Fe, Cu, Mn, K, P, Zn, etc. Valorization of water hyacinth biomass into biochar, and its application to agricultural ecosystems possesses several benefits and strengthens the economy for longer run. Even, in several parts of the globe this invasive species is widely being employed for the biochar production and management of soil quality. As suggested by many researchers, water hyacinth is considered as a good phytoremediator species and has great potential in accumulation of heavy metals and other toxic substances from the contaminated habitats (Singh and Kalamdhad 2012; Jain et al. 2019). Biochar made from E. crassipes proves to be a propitious adsorbent for the treatment of wastewater as well as contaminated soil, which can successively convert one environmental conundrum to a modern cleaning technology (Li et al., 2016a, b; Chaiyaraksa et al. 2019, 2020). The proper management of biochar residues containing higher number of toxic substances also requires to be researched upon. For example feedstock rich in heavy metals can result in their biomagnification in the food chain, when applied to soil for the enhancement of crop productivity. So, the future researches can be more focused on proper characterization and management of biochar produced form aquatic weeds like water hyacinth. Also, a very limited number of studies have estimated the changes in microbial activity in soils after addition of biochar and further research is required in this area. As a result, the study on use of biochar to improve crop production with simultaneous microbial inoculation can be important. Biochar from water hyacinth had a significant role in maintaining the soil permeability which allows successive inflows of materials within the soil that promotes plant and microbial growth (Garg et al. 2021); however, a limited number of studies have been done to explore the long-term effects of biochar amendment on soil properties. Therefore, studies on water hyacinth biochar must be done for the diverse aspects which can transform a tough challenge to a potential opportunity in the future.
References
Abd NI, Al-Mayah AM, Muallah SK (2018) Microwave pyrolysis of water Hyacinth for biochar production using Taguchi method. Int J Eng Technol 7:121–126
Abosede IA, Peter OA, Adunola AAT (2017) Biomass valorization: agricultural waste in environmental protection, phytomedicine and biofuel production. Intech Open 2017:22
Adekiya AO, Agbede TM, Olayanju A, Ejue WS, Adekanye TA, Adenusi TT, Ayeni JF (2020) Effect of biochar on soil properties, soil loss, and cocoyam yield on a tropical sandy loam alfisol. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9391630
Ahmed A, Bakar MSA, Hamdani R, Park YK, Lam SS, Sukri RS, Aslam M (2020) Valorization of underutilized waste biomass from invasive species to produce biochar for energy and other value-added applications. Environ Res 2020:109596
Akhtar SS, Li G, Andersen MN, Liu F (2014) Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation. Agric Water Manag 138:37–44
Al-Rahbi AS, Williams PT (2017) Hydrogen-rich syngas production and tar removal from biomass gasification using sacrificial tyre pyrolysis char. Appl Energy 190:501–509
Amonette JE, Joseph S (2009) Characteristics of biochar: microchemical properties. Biochar Environ Manage Sci Technol 2009:33
Amutio M, Lopez G, Artetxe M, Elordi G, Olazar M, Bilbao J (2012) Influence of temperature on biomass pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Resour Conser Recycl 59:23–31
Asadullah M, Zhang S, Li CZ (2010) Evaluation of structural features of chars from pyrolysis of biomass of different particle sizes. Fuel Process Technol 91:877–881
Azargohar R, Jacobson KL, Powell EE, Dalai AK (2013) Evaluation of properties of fast pyrolysis products obtained, from Canadian waste biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 104:330–340
Azeem M, Hayat R, Hussain Q, Ahmed M, Pan G, Tahir MI, Imran M, Irfan M (2019) Biochar improves soil quality and n2-fixation and reduces net ecosystem co2 exchange in a dryland legume-cereal cropping system. Soil Tillage Res 186:172–182
Baldock JA, Smernik RJ (2002) Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Org Geochem 33:1093–1109
Ban S, Toda T, Koyama M, Ishikawa K, Kohzu A, Imai A (2019) Modern lake ecosystem management by sustainable harvesting and effective utilization of aquatic macrophytes. Limnology 20(1):93–100
Blanco-Canqui H (2017) Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81(4):687–711
Bora J, Bordoloi M, Kumar S, Gogoi H, Zhu HH, Sarmah AK, Sreeja P, Sreedeep S, Mei G (2021) Influence of biochar from animal and plant origin on the compressive strength characteristics of degraded landfill surface soils. Int J Damage Mech 30(4):484–501
Bordoloi S, Garg A, Sreedeep S, Lin P, Mei G (2018) Investigation of cracking and water availability of soil-biochar composite synthesized from invasive weed water hyacinth. Bioresour Technol 263:665–677
Bordoloi S, Gopal P, Boddu R, Wang Q, Cheng YF, Garg A, Sreedeep S (2019) Soil-biochar-water interactions: role of biochar from Eichhornia crassipes in influencing crack propagation and suction in unsaturated soils. J Clean Prod 210:847–859
Bottezini L, Dick DP, Wisniewski A Jr, Knicker H, Carregosa ISC (2021) Phosphorus species and chemical composition of water hyacinth biochars produced at different pyrolysis temperature. Bioresour Technol Rep 14:100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100684
Brendonck L, Maes J, Rommens W et al (2003) The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrophic subtropical impoundment (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). II. Species diversity. Archiv Fur Hydrobiol 158:389–405
Bridgwater AV, Meier D, Radlein D (1999) An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org Geochem 30(12):1479–1493
Brundu G (2015) Plant invaders in European and Mediterranean inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Hydrobiologia 746:61–79
Butnan S, Deenik JL, Toomsan B, Antal MJ, Vityakon P (2015) Biochar characteristics and application rates affecting corn growth and properties of soils contrasting in texture and mineralogy. Geoderma 237:105–116
Cai R, Wang X, Ji X, Peng B, Tan C, Huang X (2017) Phosphate reclaim from simulated and real eutrophic water by magnetic biochar derived from water hyacinth. J Environ Manag 187:212–219
Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428
Cao X, Harris W (2010) Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresour Technol 101:5222–5228
Center TD, Dray FA, Jubinsky GP, Grodowltz M, de Anda J, Shear H, Maniak U, Riedel G (1999) Biological control of water hyacinth under conditions of maintenance management: can herbicides and insects be integrated? Environ Manag 23:241–256
Chaiyaraksa C, Boonyakiat W, Bukkontod W, Ngakom W (2019) Adsorption of copper (II) and nickel (II) by chemical modified magnetic biochar derived from Eichhornia crassipes. EnvironmentAsia 12(2):14–23
Chaiyaraksa C, Lokham N, Kuikrong R, Artsanapaiboon S (2020) Immobilization of cadmium in soil using magnetic biochar derived from Eichhornia crassipes. ScienceAsia 46(4):450
Chamier J, Schachtschneider K, Le Maitre DC, Ashton PJ, Van Wilgen BW (2012) Impacts of invasive alien plants on water quality, with particular emphasis on South Africa. Water SA 38(2):345–356
Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45:629–634
Chen B, Yuan M (2011) Enhanced sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by soil amended with biochar. J Soils Sed 11:62–71
Cheng S, Chen T, Xu W, Huang J, Jiang S, Yan B (2020) Application research of biochar for the remediation of soil heavy metals contamination: a review. Molecules 25(14):3167
Cornette J, Clementson C, Fredericks D (2018) Environmentally sustainable management of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in Guyana. Int J Agric Forest 8(1):4–9
Dai L, Fan L, Liu Y, Ruan R, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Yu Z (2017) Production of bio-oil and biochar from soapstock via microwave- assisted co-catalytic fast pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 225:1–8
Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe R (2021) Conversion of crop, weed and tree biomass into biochar for heavy metal removal and wastewater treatment. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01334-y
David JM (2015) Biochar and compost increase crop yields but the effect is short term on sandplain soils of Western Australia. Pedosphere 25:720–728
de la Rosa JM, Paneque M, Miller AZ, Knicker H (2014) Relating physical and chemical properties of four different biochars and their application rate to biomass production of Lolium perenne on a Calcic Cambisol during a pot experiment of 79 days. Sci Total Environ 499:175–184
Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Li Z, Tan X, Huang X, Zeng G, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Cai X (2016) Competitive removal of Cd (II) and Pb (II) by biochars produced from water hyacinths: performance and mechanism. RSC Adv 6(7):5223–5232
El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Awad YM, Yang X, Ryu C, Rizwan M, Rinklebe J, Tsang DC, Ok YS (2018) Influence of soil properties and feedstocks on biochar potential for carbon mineralization and improvement of infertile soils. Geoderma 332:100–108
Feng W, Xiao K, Zhou W, Zhu D, Zhou Y, Yuan Y, Zhao J (2017) Analysis of utilization technologies for Eichhornia crassipes biomass harvested after restoration of wastewater. Bioresour Technol 223:287–295
Gabhane JW, Bhange VP, Patil PD, Bankar ST, Kumar S (2020) Recent trends in biochar production methods and its application as a soil health conditioner: a review. SN Appl Sci 2:1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3121-5
Gao L, Li B (2004) The study of a specious invasive plant, water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): achievements and challenges. Chin J Plant Ecol 28(6):735–752
Gao Y, Wang X, Wang J, Li X, Cheng J, Yang H, Chen H (2013) Effect of residence time on chemical and structural properties of hydrochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of water hyacinth. Energy 58:376–383
Garg A, Huang H, Cai W, Reddy NG, Chen P, Han Y, Zhu HH (2021) Influence of soil density on gas permeability and water retention in soils amended with in-house produced biochar. J Rock Mech Geotech 2021:5
Gaurav GK, Mehmood T, Cheng L, Klemeš JJ, Shrivastava DK (2020) Water hyacinth as a biomass: a review. J Clean Prod 277:122214
Gogoi D, Bordoloi N, Goswami R, Narzari R, Saikia R, Sut D, Gogoi L, Kataki R (2017) Efect of torrefaction on yield and quality of pyrolytic products of arecanut husk: an agro-processing wastes. Bioresour Technol 242:36–44
Gopal P, Bordoloi S, Ratnam R, Lin P, Cai W, Buragohain P, Sreedeep S (2019) Investigation of infiltration rate for soil-biochar composites of water hyacinth. Acta Geophys 67(1):231–324
Gorovtsov AV, Minkina TM, Mandzhieva SS, Perelomov LV, Soja G, Zamulina IV, Rajput VD, Sushkova SN, Mohan D, Yao J (2019) The mechanisms of biochar interactions with microorganisms in soil. Environ Geochem Health 2019:1–24
Goyal HB, Seal D, Saxena RC (2008) Bio-fuels from thermo-chemical conversion of renewable resources: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 12(2):504–517
Guan G, Kaewpanha M, Hao X, Abudula A (2016) Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: prospects and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:450–461
Gunnarsson CC, Petersen CM (2007) Water hyacinths as are source in agriculture and energy production: a literature review. Waste Manag 27(1):117–129
Gupta DK, Gupta CK, Dubey R, Fagodiya RK, Sharma G, Keerthika A, Shukla AK (2020) Role of biochar in carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas mitigation. In: Biochar applications in agriculture and environment management, pp 141–165
Hamer U, Marschner B, Bordowski S, Amelung W (2004) Interactive priming of black carbon and glucose mineralisation. Org Geochem 35:823–830
Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:534–543
Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuels 25:1802–1810
Huang YF, Chiueh PT, Kuan WH, Lo SL (2016) Microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: heating performance and reaction kinetics. Energy 100:137–144
Huang H, Reddy NG, Huang X, Chen P, Wang P, Zhang Y, Lin P, Garg A (2021) Effects of pyrolysis temperature, feedstock type and compaction on water retention of biochar amended soil. Sci Rep 11(1):1–19
Ippolito JA, Ducey TF, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Lentz RD (2016) Designer, acidic biochar influences calcareous soil characteristics. Chemosphere 142:184–191
Jafari N (2010) Ecological and socio-economic utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Mart. Solms). J Appl Sci Environ Manag 14(2):43–49
Jain MS, Paul S, Kalamdhad AS (2019) Utilization of Biochar as an amendment during lignocellulose waste composting: impact on composting physics and realization (probability) amongst physical properties. Process Saf Environ 121:229–238
Jha P, Biswas AK, Lakaria BL, Subba Rao A (2010) Biochar in agriculture-prospects and related implications. Curr Sci 99:1218–1225
Jia H, Ben H, Wu F (2021) Effect of biochar prepared from food waste through different thermal treatment processes on crop growth. Processes 9:276. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020276
Jiang TY, Jiang J, Xu RK, Li Z (2012) Adsorption of Pb (II) on variable charge soils amended with rice-straw derived biochar. Chemosphere 89:249–256
Kalus K, Koziel JA, Opaliński S (2019) A review of biochar properties and their utilization in crop agriculture and livestock production. Appl Sci 9(17):3494
Khalifa N, Yousef LF (2015) A short report on changes of quality indicators for a sandy textured soil after treatment with biochar produced from fronds of date palm. Energy Procedia 74:960–965
Khan S, Wang N, Reid BJ, Freddo A, Cai C (2013) Reduced bioaccumulation of PAHs by Lactuca satuva L. grown in contaminated soil amended with sewage sludge and sewage sludge derived biochar. Environ Poll 175:64–68
Kuhlbusch TAJ (1998) Black carbon and the carbon cycle. Sci 280:1903–1904
Kuhlbusch TAJ, Andreae MO, Cachier H, Goldammer JG, Lacaux JP, Shea R, Crutzen PJ (1996) Black carbon formation by savanna fires: measurements and implication for the global carbon cycle. J Geophys Res Atm 101:23651–23665
Kumar A, Joseph S, Tsechansky L, Privat K, Schreiter IJ, Schüth C et al (2018) Biochar aging in contaminated soil promotes Zn immobilization due to changes in biochar surface structural and chemical properties. Sci Total Environ 626:953–961
Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen HQ, Bogomolova I, Xu XL (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by C-14 labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 41:210–219
Kwon G, Bhatnagar A, Wang H, Kwon EE, Song H (2020) A review of recent advancements in utilization of biomass and industrial wastes into engineered biochar. J Hazard Mat 400:123242
Laghari M, Naidu R, Xiao B, Hu ZQ, Mirjat MS, Hu M (2016) Fast pyrolysis biochar from sawdust improves the quality of desert soils and enhances plant growth. J Sci Food Agric 96(1):199–206
Lahori AH, Zhanyu GUO, Zhang Z, Ronghua LI, Mahar A, Awasthi MK, Jiang S (2017) Use of biochar as an amendment for remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: prospects and challenges. Pedosphere 27(6):991–1014
Lai WY, Lai C-M, Ke GR, Chung R-S, Chen CT, Cheng C-H, Pai CW, Chen SY, Chen CC (2013) The effects of woodchip biochar application on crop yield, carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions from soils planted with rice or leaf beet. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:1039–1044
Lata N, Veenapani D (2011) Response of water hyacinth manure on growth attributes and yield in Brassica juncea. J Cent Eur Agric 12(2):336–343
Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. Biochar Environ Manag Sci Technol 1:1–12
Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2005) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—a review. Mitigation Adapt Strat Global Change 11:403–427
Li X, Hayashi JI, Li CZ (2006) FT-Raman spectroscopic study of the evolution of char structure during the pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal. Fuel 85:1700–1707
Li F, Shen K, Long X, Wen J, Xie X, Zeng X, Zhong R (2016a) Preparation and characterization of biochars from Eichhornia crassipes for cadmium removal in aqueous solutions. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0148132
Li F, Shen K, Long X, Wen J, Xie X, Zeng X, Zhong R (2016b) Preparation and characterization of biochars from Eichornia crassipes for cadmium removal in aqueous solutions. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0148132
Li H, Dong X, da Silva EB, de Oliveira LM, Chen Y, Ma LQ (2017) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–478
Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Sohi S, Thies JE, Skjemstad JO, Luizao FJ, Engelhard MH, Neves EG, Wirick S (2008) Stability of biomass-derived black carbon in soils. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:6069–6078
Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici M-M, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich K-H (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:71–106
Liu Z, Chen X, Jing Y, Li Q, Zhang J, Huang Q (2014) Effects of biochar amendment on rapeseed and sweet potato yields and water stable aggregate in upland red soil. CATENA 123:45–51
Lu JB, Wu JG, Fu ZH, Zhu L (2007) Water hyacinth in China: a sustainability science-based management framework. Environ Manag 40:823–830
Luo S, Xiao B, Hu Z, Liu S, Guo X, He M (2009) Hydrogen-rich gas from catalytic steam gasification of biomass in a fixed bed reactor: influence of temperature and steam on gasification performance. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2191–2194
Manyà JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):7939–7954
Martinez-Jimenez M, Gomez-Balandra MA (2007) Integrated control of Eichhornia crassipes by using insects and plant pathogens in Mexico. Crop Prot 26:1234–1238
Masto RE, Kumar S, Rout TK, Sarkar P, George J, Ram LC (2013) Biochar from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and its impact on soil biological activity. CATENA 111:64–71
Mckendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (Part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83(1):37–46
McLaughlin H, Anderson PS, Shields FE, Reed TB (2009) All biochars are not created equal and how to tell them apart. In: Presented at: North Americal Biochars Conference, 9–12 August, Boulder, CO., USA
Méndez A, Paz-Ferreiro J, Gil E, Gascó G (2015) The effect of paper sludge and biochar addition on brown peat and coir based growing media properties. Sci Hortic (amsterd) 193:225–230
Mitchell DS (1985) Surface-floating aquatic macrophytes. In: Denny P (ed) The ecology and management of african wetland vegetation. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 109–124
Mosa A, El-Ghamry A, Tolba M (2018) Functionalized biochar derived from heavy metal rich feedstock: phosphate recovery and reusing the exhausted biochar as an enriched soil amendment. Chemosphere 198:351–363
Muhammad N, Aziz R, Brookes PC, Xu J (2017) Impact of wheat straw biochar on yield of rice and some properties of Psammaquent and Plinthudult. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17(3):808–823
Muigai HH, Bordoloi U, Hussain R, Ravi K, Moholkar VS, Kalita P (2021) A comparative study on synthesis and characterization of biochars derived from lignocellulosic biomass for their candidacy in agronomy and energy applications. Int J Energy Res 45(3):4765–4781
Naeem MA, Khalid M, Aon M, Abbas G, Tahir M, Amjad M, Akhtar SS (2017) Effect of wheat and rice straw biochar produced at different temperatures on maize growth and nutrient dynamics of a calcareous soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:2048–2061
Nair VD, Nair PK, Dari B, Freitas AM, Chatterjee N, Pinheiro FM (2017) Biochar in the agroecosystem-climate-change-sustainability nexus. Front Plant Sci 8:2051
Najmudeen TM, Arakkal Febna MA, Rojith G, Zacharia PU (2019) Characterization of biochar from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and the effects of biochar on the growth of fish and paddy in integrated culture systems. J Coast Res 86:225–234
Nguyen BT, Lehmann J (2009) Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes. Org Geochem 40:846–853
Nguyen BT, Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Smernik R, Riha SJ, Engelhard MH (2009) Long-term black carbon dynamics in cultivated soil. Biogeochem 92:163–176
Nyamunda BC, Chivhanga T, Guyo U, Chigondo F (2019) Removal of Zn (II) and Cu (II) ions from industrial wastewaters using magnetic biochar derived from water hyacinth. J Eng 2019:5
O’toole A, Moni C, Weldon S, Schols A, Carnol M, Bosman B, Rasse DP (2018) Miscanthus biochar had limited effects on soil physical properties, microbial biomass, and grain yield in a four-year field experiment in Norway. Agric 8(11):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8110171
Oladele SO (2019) Effect of biochar amendment on soil enzymatic activities, carboxylate secretions and upland rice performance in a sandy clay loam Alfisol of Southwest Nigeria. Sci Afr 4:00107
Paetsch L, Mueller CW, Rumpel C, Angst S, Wiesheu AC, Girardin C, Ivleva NP, Niessner R, Kögel-Knabner I (2017) Multi-technique approach to assess the fate of high-temperature biochar in soil and to quantify its effect on soil organic matter composition. Org Geochem 122:177–186
Pereira RC, Kaal J, Arbestain MC, Lorenzo RP, Aitkenhead W, Hedley M, Maciá-Agulló JA (2011) Contribution to characterisation of biochar to estimate the labile fraction of carbon. Org Geochem 42(11):1331–1342
Petersen-Rockney M (2015) Biochar in Temperate agricultural soils, excerpted by Jack Kittredge. The natural farmer special supplement on biochar in agriculture. Fall 2015:19–22
Rahel FJ, Olden JD (2008) Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22:521–533
Reddy KR, Yargicoglu EN, Yue D, Yaghoubi P (2014) Enhanced microbial methane oxidation in landfill cover soil amended with biochar. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(9):04014047
Rehman HA, Razzaq R (2017) Benefits of biochar on the agriculture and environment-a review. J Environ Anal Chem 4(3):1–3
Renner R (2007) Rethinking biochar. Environ Sci Technol 41:5932–5933
Rodriguez-Gallego LR, Mazzeo N, Gorga J, Meerhoff M, Clemente J, Kruk C, Scasso F, Lacerot G, Garcıa J, Quintans F (2004) The effects of an artificial wetland dominated by free-floating plants on the restoration of a subtropical, hypertrophic lake. Lakes Reserv 9:203–215
Safaei Khorram M, Zhang Q, Lin D, Zheng Y, Fang H, Yu Y (2016) Biochar: a review of its impact on pesticide behavior in soil environments and its potential applications. J Environ Sci 44:269–279
Saletnik B, Bajcar M, Zaguła G, Czernicka M, Puchalski C (2016) Impact of the biomass pyrolysis parameters on the quality of biocarbon obtained from rape straw, rye straw and willow chips. Econtechmod Int Q J Econ Technol Model Proc 5(2):139–143
Sánchez-Reinoso AD, Ávila-Pedraza EÁ, Restrepo-Díaz H (2020) Use of biochar in agriculture. Acta Biol Colomb 25(2):327–338
Scott AC, Glasspool IJ (2007) Observations and experiments on the origin and formation of inertinite group macerals. Int J Coal Geol 70:53–66
Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2009) The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon 47:2281–2289
Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A, Madhavan A, Alphonsa JA, Vivek N, Faraco V (2017) Water hyacinth a potential source for value addition: an overview. Bioresour Technol 230:152–162
Singh KP (2005) Invasive alien species and biodiversity in India. Curr Sci 88(4):539–540
Singh J, Kalamdhad AS (2012) Concentration and speciation of heavy metals during water hyacinth composting. Bioresour Technol 124:169–179
Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Lentz RD (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41(4):973–989
Téllez TR, López EMR, Granado GL, Pérez EA, López RM, Guzmán JMS (2008) The Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes: an invasive plant in the Guadiana River Basin (Spain). Aquat Invasions 3(1):42–53. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2008.3.1.8
Tripathi M, Sahu JN, Ganesan P (2016) Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 55:467–481
Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Thomas Klasson K, Chang S, Wartelle LH et al (2010) Immobilization of heavy metal ions (CuII, CdII, NiII, and PbII) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem 58: 5538–5544
Uchimiya M, Chang SC, Klasson KT (2011) Screening biochars for heavy metal retention in soil: role of oxygen functional groups. J Hazard Mater 190 (1–3):432–441
Ulusal A, Varol EA, Bruckman VJ, Uzun BB (2020) Opportunity for sustainable biomass valorization to produce biochar for improving soil characteristics. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2020:1–11
UNEP (2013) Water hyacinth-can its aggressive invasion be controlled? UNEP United Nations Environment Programme. April 1, 2013. http://na.unep.net/geas/getUNEPPageWithArticleIDScript.php?article_id=98
Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, Velde Mvd, Diafas I (2009) Biochar application to soils—a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. In: EUR 24099 EN Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, pp 149
Verma M, Godbout S, Brar SK, Solomatnikova O, Lemay SP, Larouche JP (2012) Biofuels production from biomass by thermochemical conversion technologies. Int J Chem Eng 2012:1–18
Villegas-Pangga G (2021) Production and characterization of biochars from slow Pyrolysis of different biomass materials to evaluate properties as soil mendments. Philipp J Sci 150(1):267–276
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) Soil Sci, pp 29–38. In: Soil and Plant Analysis. By, C. S. Piper. (1966) Hans Publication, Bombay, pp 213–229
Wang B, Gao B, Fang J (2017) Recent advances in engineered biochar productions and applications. Critical reviews. Environ Sci Technol 47(22):2158–2207
Wang G, Fan B, Chen H, Li Y (2020) Understanding the pyrolysis behavior of agriculture, forest and aquatic biomass: products distribution and characterization. J Energy Inst 93(5):1892–1900
Wilson K (2014) How biochar works in soil. Biochar J 32:25–33
Wilson JR, Holst N, Rees M (2005) Determinants and patterns of population growth in water hyacinth. Aquat Bot 81(1):51–67
Xiao R, Yang W (2013) Influence of temperature on organic structure of biomass pyrolysis products. Renew Energy 50:136–141
Xu Z, Xing Y, Ren A, Ma D, Li Y, Hu S (2020) Study on adsorption properties of water hyacinth-derived biochar for uranium (VI). J Radio Analyt Nuclear Chem 324(3):1317–1327
Yin D, Wang X, Chen C, Peng B, Tan C, Li H (2016) Varying effect of biochar on Cd, Pb and As mobility in a multi-metal contaminated paddy soil. Chemosphere 152:196–206
Yuan P, Wang J, Pan Y, Shen B, Wu C (2019) Review of biochar for the management of contaminated soil: preparation, application and prospect. Sci Total Environ 659:473–490
Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23(5):431–452
Zhang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Inyang M (2012) Synthesis, characterization and environmental implications of graphene-coated biochar. Sci Total Environ 435:567–572
Zhang F, Wang X, Yin D, Peng B, Tan C, Liu Y, Tan X, Wu S (2015) Efficiency and mechanisms of Cd removal from aqueous solution by biochar derived from water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes). J Environ Manag 153:68–73
Zhao J, Shen XJ, Domene X, Alcañiz JM, Liao X, Palet C (2019) Comparison of biochars derived from different types of feedstock and their potential for heavy metal removal in multiple-metal solutions. Sci Rep 9(1):1–12
Zheng JC, Liu HQ, Feng HM, Li WW, Lam MHW, Lam PKS, Yu HQ (2016) Competitive sorption of heavy metals by water hyacinth roots. Environ Poll 219:837–845
Zhou W, Zhu D, Langdon A, Li L, Liao S, Tan L (2009) The structure characterization of cellulose xanthogenate derived from the straw of Eichhornia crassipes. Bioresour Technol 100:5366–5369
Zhou R, Zhang M, Li J, Zhao W (2020) Optimization of preparation conditions for biochar derived from water hyacinth by using response surface methodology (RSM) and its application in Pb2+ removal. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):104198
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no any conflict of Interest.
Informed consent
I ensure that all the authors mentioned in the manuscript have agreed for authorship, read and approved the manuscript, and given consent for submission and subsequent publication of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumari, K., Swain, A.A., Kumar, M. et al. Utilization of Eichhornia crassipes biomass for production of biochar and its feasibility in agroecosystems: a review. Environmental Sustainability 4, 285–297 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00185-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00185-7