Abstract
In theories with a perturbatively massless 2-form (dual to an axion), a paradox may arise in the process of black hole evaporation. Schwarzschild black holes can support a non-trivial Wilson-line-type field, the integral of the 2-form around their horizon. After such an ‘axionic black hole’ evaporates, the Wilson line must be supported by the corresponding 3-form field strength in the region formerly occupied by the black hole. In the limit of small axion decay-constant f, the energy required for this field configuration is too large. Thus, energy cannot be conserved in the process of black hole evaporation. The natural resolution of this paradox is through the presence of light strings, which allow the black hole to “shed” its axionic hair sufficiently early. This gives rise to a new Weak-Gravity-type argument in the 2-form context: small coupling, in this case f , enforces the presence of light strings or a low cutoff. We also discuss how this argument may be modified in situations where the weak coupling regime is achieved in the low-energy effective theory through an appropriate gauging of a model with a vector field and two 2-forms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019 [arXiv:1011.5120] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172 [arXiv:1412.5148] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, M. Johnson and A. Shomer, A Note on Gauge Theories Coupled to Gravity, JHEP 09 (2006) 049 [hep-th/0606277] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 051601 [arXiv:1402.2287] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064076 [arXiv:1509.00851] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama and Y. Nomura, Weak gravity conjecture in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 126006 [arXiv:1509.01647] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction, JHEP 02 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1509.06374] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, Wormholes, Emergent Gauge Fields and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1510.07911] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez, M. Montero, A. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, Relaxion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1512.00025] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, F. Rompineve and A. Westphal, Axion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2016) 157 [arXiv:1512.03768] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 08 (2017) 025 [arXiv:1606.08437] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, G. Shiu and P. Soler, The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions, JHEP 10 (2016) 159 [arXiv:1606.08438] [INSPIRE].
P. Saraswat, Weak gravity conjecture and effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 025013 [arXiv:1608.06951] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland, arXiv:1610.01533 [INSPIRE].
B. Freivogel and M. Kleban, Vacua Morghulis, arXiv:1610.04564 [INSPIRE].
U. Danielsson and G. Dibitetto, Fate of stringy AdS vacua and the weak gravity conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 026020 [arXiv:1611.01395] [INSPIRE].
W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler, Weak Gravity Conjecture and Extremal Black Holes, arXiv:1611.06270 [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, Note on a Paper by Ooguri and Vafa, arXiv:1611.08953 [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, P. Henkenjohann and L.T. Witkowski, What is the Magnetic Weak Gravity Conjecture for Axions?, Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1700011 [arXiv:1701.06553] [INSPIRE].
A. de la Fuente, P. Saraswat and R. Sundrum, Natural Inflation and Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 151303 [arXiv:1412.3457] [INSPIRE].
T. Rudelius, Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JCAP 09 (2015) 020 [arXiv:1503.00795] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, Transplanckian axions!?, JHEP 08 (2015) 032 [arXiv:1503.03886] [INSPIRE].
J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler, Fencing in the Swampland: Quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation, JHEP 10 (2015) 023 [arXiv:1503.04783] [INSPIRE].
T.C. Bachlechner, C. Long and L. McAllister, Planckian Axions and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 091 [arXiv:1503.07853] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, F. Rompineve and L.T. Witkowski, Winding out of the Swamp: Evading the Weak Gravity Conjecture with F-term Winding Inflation?, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 455 [arXiv:1503.07912] [INSPIRE].
J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler, On Axionic Field Ranges, Loopholes and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2016) 017 [arXiv:1504.00659] [INSPIRE].
D. Junghans, Large-Field Inflation with Multiple Axions and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 02 (2016) 128 [arXiv:1504.03566] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation, JHEP 12 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1506.03447] [INSPIRE]
K. Kooner, S. Parameswaran and I. Zavala, Warping the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 402 [arXiv:1509.07049] [INSPIRE].
N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. Lawrence and M.S. Sloth, Large Field Inflation and Gravitational Entropy, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 043510 [arXiv:1511.05119] [INSPIRE].
R. Kappl, H.P. Nilles and M.W. Winkler, Modulated Natural Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 653 [arXiv:1511.05560] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi and H. Kim, Aligned natural inflation with modulations, Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 520 [arXiv:1511.07201] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, S. Theisen and L.T. Witkowski, Can Gravitational Instantons Really Constrain Axion Inflation?, JHEP 02 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1607.06814] [INSPIRE].
D. Klaewer and E. Palti, Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity, JHEP 01 (2017) 088 [arXiv:1610.00010] [INSPIRE].
A. Herraez and L.E. Ibáñez, An Axion-induced SM/MSSM Higgs Landscape and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 02 (2017) 109 [arXiv:1610.08836] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolan, P. Draper, J. Kozaczuk and H. Patel, Transplanckian Censorship and Global Cosmic Strings, JHEP 04 (2017) 133 [arXiv:1701.05572] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Bowick, S.B. Giddings, J.A. Harvey, G.T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Axionic Black Holes and a Bohm-Aharonov Effect for Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 2823 [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and A. Gußmann, Skyrmion Black Hole Hair: Conservation of Baryon Number by Black Holes and Observable Manifestations, Nucl. Phys. B 913 (2016) 1001 [arXiv:1605.00543] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and A. Gußmann, Aharonov-Bohm protection of black hole’s baryon/skyrmion hair, Phys. Lett. B 768 (2017) 274 [arXiv:1611.09370] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, A Chern-Simons Pandemic, JHEP 07 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1702.06147] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, Trouble for remnants, hep-th/9501106 [INSPIRE].
J. Preskill and L.M. Krauss, Local Discrete Symmetry and Quantum Mechanical Hair, Nucl. Phys. B 341 (1990) 50 [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, J. Preskill and F. Wilczek, Quantum hair on black holes, Nucl. Phys. B 378 (1992) 175 [hep-th/9201059] [INSPIRE].
L.M. Krauss and S.-J. Rey, Duality, axion charge and quantum mechanical hair, Phys. Lett. B 254 (1991) 355 [INSPIRE].
A.G. Cohen and D.B. Kaplan, The Exact Metric About Global Cosmic Strings, Phys. Lett. B 215 (1988) 67 [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski, Open heterotic strings, JHEP 09 (2006) 082 [hep-th/0510033] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, Three-form gauging of axion symmetries and gravity, hep-th/0507215 [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, Topological mass generation in four dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 081602 [hep-th/0511175] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, S. Folkerts and A. Franca, How neutrino protects the axion, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 105025 [arXiv:1312.7273] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and L. Funcke, Small neutrino masses from gravitational θ-term, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 113002 [arXiv:1602.03191] [INSPIRE].
E. García-Valdecasas and A. Uranga, On the 3-form formulation of axion potentials from D-brane instantons, JHEP 02 (2017) 087 [arXiv:1605.08092] [INSPIRE].
J.E. Kim, H.P. Nilles and M. Peloso, Completing natural inflation, JCAP 01 (2005) 005 [hep-ph/0409138] [INSPIRE].
N. Kaloper and L. Sorbo, A Natural Framework for Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 121301 [arXiv:0811.1989] [INSPIRE].
S. Hod, A proof of the weak gravity conjecture, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 (2017) 1742004 [arXiv:1705.06287] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1702.06130
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Hebecker, A., Soler, P. The Weak Gravity Conjecture and the axionic black hole paradox. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)036
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)036