Abstract
We introduce a general framework realizing edge modes in (classical) gauge field theory as dynamical reference frames, an often suggested interpretation that we make entirely explicit. We focus on a bounded region M with a co-dimension one time-like boundary Γ, which we embed in a global spacetime. Taking as input a variational principle at the global level, we develop a systematic formalism inducing consistent variational principles (and in particular, boundary actions) for the subregion M. This relies on a post-selection procedure on Γ, which isolates the subsector of the global theory compatible with a general choice of gauge-invariant boundary conditions for the dynamics in M. Crucially, the latter relate the configuration fields on Γ to a dynamical frame field carrying information about the spacetime complement of M; as such, they may be equivalently interpreted as frame-dressed or relational observables. Generically, the external frame field keeps an imprint on the ensuing dynamics for subregion M, where it materializes itself as a local field on the time-like boundary Γ; in other words, an edge mode. We identify boundary symmetries as frame reorientations and show that they divide into three types, depending on the boundary conditions, that affect the physical status of the edge modes. Our construction relies on the covariant phase space formalism, and is in principle applicable to any gauge (field) theory. We illustrate it on three standard examples: Maxwell, Abelian Chern-Simons and non-Abelian Yang-Mills theories. In complement, we also analyze a mechanical toy-model to connect our work with recent efforts on (quantum) reference frames.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
B.I. Halperin, Quantized hall conductance, current-carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25 (1982) 2185.
X.-G. Wen, Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum hall effects, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 06 (1992) 1711.
W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity, JHEP 09 (2016) 102 [arXiv:1601.04744] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall, Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 111603 [arXiv:1412.1895] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller, Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 924 (2017) 312 [arXiv:1703.04748] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes, F. Hopfmüller and A. Riello, A unified geometric framework for boundary charges and dressings: non-Abelian theory and matter, Nucl. Phys. B 941 (2019) 249 [arXiv:1808.02074] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes and A. Riello, The quasilocal degrees of freedom of Yang-Mills theory, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 130 [arXiv:1910.04222] [INSPIRE].
A. Riello, Symplectic reduction of Yang-Mills theory with boundaries: from superselection sectors to edge modes, and back, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 125 [arXiv:2010.15894] [INSPIRE].
A. Riello, Edge modes without edge modes, arXiv:2104.10182 [INSPIRE].
A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Edge dynamics from the path integral — Maxwell and Yang-Mills, JHEP 11 (2018) 080 [arXiv:1804.07585] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller and P. Jai-akson, Extended actions, dynamics of edge modes, and entanglement entropy, JHEP 09 (2020) 134 [arXiv:1912.06025] [INSPIRE].
G. Wong, A note on entanglement edge modes in Chern Simons theory, JHEP 08 (2018) 020 [arXiv:1706.04666] [INSPIRE].
P. Mathieu, L. Murray, A. Schenkel and N.J. Teh, Homological perspective on edge modes in linear Yang-Mills and Chern-Simons theory, Lett. Math. Phys. 110 (2020) 1559 [arXiv:1907.10651] [INSPIRE].
P. Mathieu and N.J. Teh, Boundary electromagnetic duality from homological edge modes, JHEP 21 (2020) 192 [arXiv:2102.06799] [INSPIRE].
J. François, Bundle geometry of the connection space, covariant Hamiltonian formalism, the problem of boundaries in gauge theories, and the dressing field method, JHEP 03 (2021) 225 [arXiv:2010.01597] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel and A. Perez, Quantum gravity at the corner, Universe 4 (2018) 107 [arXiv:1507.02573] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and S.B. Giddings, Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104038 [arXiv:1607.01025] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Speranza, Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories, JHEP 02 (2018) 021 [arXiv:1706.05061] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller, Lorentz-diffeomorphism edge modes in 3d gravity, JHEP 02 (2018) 029 [arXiv:1712.05269] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, E.R. Livine and D. Pranzetti, Gravitational edge modes: from Kac-Moody charges to Poincaré networks, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 195014 [arXiv:1906.07876] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, M. Geiller and D. Pranzetti, Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges, JHEP 11 (2020) 026 [arXiv:2006.12527] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, M. Geiller and D. Pranzetti, Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges, JHEP 11 (2020) 027 [arXiv:2007.03563] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, M. Geiller and D. Pranzetti, Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints, JHEP 01 (2021) 100 [arXiv:2007.12635] [INSPIRE].
M. Dupuis, L. Freidel, F. Girelli, A. Osumanu and J. Rennert, On the origin of the quantum group symmetry in 3d quantum gravity, arXiv:2006.10105 [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller, E.R. Livine and F. Sartini, Symmetries of the black hole interior and singularity regularization, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 022 [arXiv:2010.07059] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly, L. Freidel, S.F. Moosavian and A.J. Speranza, Gravitational edge modes, coadjoint orbits, and hydrodynamics, JHEP 09 (2021) 008 [arXiv:2012.10367] [INSPIRE].
E.R. Livine, Loop quantum gravity boundary dynamics and gauge theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 135031 [arXiv:2101.07565] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti and S. Speziale, Extended corner symmetry, charge bracket and Einstein’s equations, JHEP 09 (2021) 083 [arXiv:2104.12881] [INSPIRE].
W. Wieland, Fock representation of gravitational boundary modes and the discreteness of the area spectrum, Annales Henri Poincaré 18 (2017) 3695 [arXiv:1706.00479] [INSPIRE].
W. Wieland, New boundary variables for classical and quantum gravity on a null surface, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 215008 [arXiv:1704.07391] [INSPIRE].
W. Wieland, Null infinity as an open Hamiltonian system, JHEP 04 (2021) 095 [arXiv:2012.01889] [INSPIRE].
W. Wieland, Gravitational SL(2, ℝ) algebra on the light cone, JHEP 07 (2021) 057 [arXiv:2104.05803] [INSPIRE].
T. Takayanagi and K. Tamaoka, Gravity Edges Modes and Hayward Term, JHEP 02 (2020) 167 [arXiv:1912.01636] [INSPIRE].
E. De Paoli and S. Speziale, A gauge-invariant symplectic potential for tetrad general relativity, JHEP 07 (2018) 040 [arXiv:1804.09685] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller and C. Goeller, Dual diffeomorphisms and finite distance asymptotic symmetries in 3d gravity, arXiv:2012.05263 [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, C. Goeller and E.R. Livine, The quantum gravity disk: Discrete current algebra, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021) 102303 [arXiv:2103.13171] [INSPIRE].
J. Kirklin, The Holographic Dual of the Entanglement Wedge Symplectic Form, JHEP 01 (2020) 071 [arXiv:1910.00457] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and G. Wong, Entanglement branes in a two-dimensional string theory, JHEP 09 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1610.01719] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly, Y. Jiang, M. Kim and G. Wong, Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part I. Generalized entropy for closed strings, JHEP 10 (2021) 201 [arXiv:2010.15737] [INSPIRE].
Y. Jiang, M. Kim and G. Wong, Entanglement entropy and edge modes in topological string theory. Part II. The dual gauge theory story, JHEP 10 (2021) 202 [arXiv:2012.13397] [INSPIRE].
F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz and v. Brukner, Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames, Nature Commun. 10 (2019) 494 [arXiv:1712.07207] [INSPIRE].
A. Vanrietvelde, P.A. Höhn, F. Giacomini and E. Castro-Ruiz, A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework, Quantum 4 (2020) 225 [arXiv:1809.00556] [INSPIRE].
A. Vanrietvelde, P.A. Höhn and F. Giacomini, Switching quantum reference frames in the N-body problem and the absence of global relational perspectives, arXiv:1809.05093 [INSPIRE].
P.A. Höhn, Switching Internal Times and a New Perspective on the ‘Wave Function of the Universe’, Universe 5 (2019) 116 [arXiv:1811.00611] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Höhn and A. Vanrietvelde, How to switch between relational quantum clocks, New J. Phys. 22 (2020) 123048 [arXiv:1810.04153] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Höhn, A.R.H. Smith and M.P.E. Lock, Trinity of relational quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 066001 [arXiv:1912.00033] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Höhn, A.R.H. Smith and M.P.E. Lock, Equivalence of Approaches to Relational Quantum Dynamics in Relativistic Settings, Front. in Phys. 9 (2021) 181 [arXiv:2007.00580] [INSPIRE].
M. Krumm, P.A. Höhn and M.P. Müller, Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle, Quantum 5 (2021) 530 [arXiv:2011.01951] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Höhn, M. Krumm and M.P. Müller, Internal quantum reference frames for finite Abelian groups, arXiv:2107.07545 [INSPIRE].
P.A. Höhn, M.P.E. Lock, S.A. Ahmad, A.R.H. Smith and T.D. Galley, Quantum Relativity of Subsystems, accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. Lett. arXiv:2103.01232 [INSPIRE].
A.-C. de la Hamette and T.D. Galley, Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups, Quantum 4 (2020) 367 [arXiv:2004.14292] [INSPIRE].
E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, A. Belenchia and v. Brukner, Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems, Nature Commun. 11 (2020) 2672 [arXiv:1908.10165] [INSPIRE].
F. Giacomini and v. Brukner, Einstein’s Equivalence principle for superpositions of gravitational fields, arXiv:2012.13754 [INSPIRE].
A. Ballesteros, F. Giacomini and G. Gubitosi, The group structure of dynamical transformations between quantum reference frames, Quantum 5 (2021) 470 [arXiv:2012.15769] [INSPIRE].
C. Crnkovic and E. Witten, Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories, in Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1987), pg. 676.
J. Lee and R.M. Wald, Local symmetries and constraints, J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 725 [INSPIRE].
A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli and O. Reula, The covariant phase space of asymptotically flat gravitational fields, in Mechanics, analysis and geometry: 200 years after Lagrange, Elsevier, Amsterdam The Netherlands (1991), pg. 417.
M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (1992).
R.M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the Noether charge, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) R3427 [gr-qc/9307038] [INSPIRE].
T. Jacobson, G. Kang and R.C. Myers, On black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6587 [gr-qc/9312023] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Wald and A. Zoupas, A General definition of ’conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 084027 [gr-qc/9911095] [INSPIRE].
V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028] [INSPIRE].
V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, A Comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4430 [gr-qc/9503052] [INSPIRE].
I. Khavkine, Covariant phase space, constraints, gauge and the Peierls formula, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1430009 [arXiv:1402.1282] [INSPIRE].
F. Gieres, Covariant canonical formulations of classical field theories, arXiv:2109.07330 [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow and J.-Q. Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, JHEP 10 (2020) 146 [arXiv:1906.08616] [INSPIRE].
J. Margalef-Bentabol and E.J.S. Villaseñor, Geometric formulation of the Covariant Phase Space methods with boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 025011 [arXiv:2008.01842] [INSPIRE].
V. Chandrasekaran and A.J. Speranza, Anomalies in gravitational charge algebras of null boundaries and black hole entropy, JHEP 01 (2021) 137 [arXiv:2009.10739] [INSPIRE].
G. Compere and D. Marolf, Setting the boundary free in AdS/CFT, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 195014 [arXiv:0805.1902] [INSPIRE].
T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R.C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs, JHEP 03 (2014) 051 [arXiv:1312.7856] [INSPIRE].
T. Faulkner, F.M. Haehl, E. Hijano, O. Parrikar, C. Rabideau and M. Van Raamsdonk, Nonlinear Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories, JHEP 08 (2017) 057 [arXiv:1705.03026] [INSPIRE].
D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE].
A. Belin, A. Lewkowycz and G. Sárosi, Complexity and the bulk volume, a new York time story, JHEP 03 (2019) 044 [arXiv:1811.03097] [INSPIRE].
A. Belin, A. Lewkowycz and G. Sárosi, The boundary dual of the bulk symplectic form, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 71 [arXiv:1806.10144] [INSPIRE].
J. Kirklin, Unambiguous Phase Spaces for Subregions, JHEP 03 (2019) 116 [arXiv:1901.09857] [INSPIRE].
J. Kirklin, Islands and Uhlmann phase: explicit recovery of classical information from evaporating black holes, JHEP 01 (2022) 119 [arXiv:2011.07086] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Pedraza, A. Russo, A. Svesko and Z. Weller-Davies, Sewing spacetime with Lorentzian threads: complexity and the emergence of time in quantum gravity, arXiv:2106.12585 [INSPIRE].
J.F. Pedraza, A. Russo, A. Svesko and Z. Weller-Davies, Lorentzian Threads as Gatelines and Holographic Complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 271602 [arXiv:2105.12735] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow and J.-q. Wu, Algebra of diffeomorphism-invariant observables in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity, arXiv:2108.04841 [INSPIRE].
G. Compère and A. Fiorucci, Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, arXiv:1801.07064 [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and F. Brandt, Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges, Nucl. Phys. B 633 (2002) 3 [hep-th/0111246] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and G. Compere, Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008) 042901 [arXiv:0708.2378] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 111103 [arXiv:0909.2617] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, BMS charge algebra, JHEP 12 (2011) 105 [arXiv:1106.0213] [INSPIRE].
G. Compere and F. Dehouck, Relaxing the Parity Conditions of Asymptotically Flat Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 245016 [Erratum ibid. 30 (2013) 039501] [arXiv:1106.4045] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller, C. Goeller and N. Merino, Most general theory of 3d gravity: Covariant phase space, dual diffeomorphisms, and more, JHEP 02 (2021) 120 [arXiv:2011.09873] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti and S. Speziale, The Weyl BMS group and Einstein’s equations, JHEP 07 (2021) 170 [arXiv:2104.05793] [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity?, Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991) 297 [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Quantum reference systems, Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991) 317 [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Partial observables, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 124013 [gr-qc/0110035] [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2004).
C. Rovelli, Time in Quantum Gravity: Physics Beyond the Schrödinger Regime, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 442 [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Quantum mechanics without time: a model, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2638 [INSPIRE].
B. Dittrich, Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems, Gen. Rel. Grav. 39 (2007) 1891 [gr-qc/0411013] [INSPIRE].
B. Dittrich, Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 6155 [gr-qc/0507106] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf, Unitarity and Holography in Gravitational Physics, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 044010 [arXiv:0808.2842] [INSPIRE].
F. Giacomini and v. Brukner, Quantum superposition of spacetimes obeys Einstein’s Equivalence Principle, AVS Quantum Sci. 4 (2022) 015601 [arXiv:2109.01405] [INSPIRE].
L. Chataignier, Construction of quantum Dirac observables and the emergence of WKB time, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 086001 [arXiv:1910.02998] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Angelo, N. Brunner, S. Popescu, A.J. Short and P. Skrzypczyk, Physics within a quantum reference frame, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 145304 [arXiv:1007.2292].
B. Dittrich and J. Tambornino, Gauge invariant perturbations around symmetry reduced sectors of general relativity: Applications to cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 4543 [gr-qc/0702093] [INSPIRE].
S. Carrozza and P.A. Höhn, Edge modes, gluing procedures and post-selection, to appear.
C. Rovelli, Why Gauge?, Found. Phys. 44 (2014) 91 [arXiv:1308.5599] [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Gauge Is More Than Mathematical Redundancy, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 199 (2020) 107 [arXiv:2009.10362] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph and R.W. Spekkens, Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 555 [quant-ph/0610030] [INSPIRE].
L. Chataignier, P.A. Höhn and M.P.E. Lock, Relational dynamics with periodic clocks, to appear.
H. Gomes and A. Riello, The observer’s ghost: notes on a field space connection, JHEP 05 (2017) 017 [arXiv:1608.08226] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes and A. Riello, Unified geometric framework for boundary charges and particle dressings, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 025013 [arXiv:1804.01919] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini, M. Huerta and J.A. Rosabal, Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085012 [arXiv:1312.1183] [INSPIRE].
S. Carlip, Statistical mechanics and black hole entropy, gr-qc/9509024 [INSPIRE].
S. Carlip, The Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 632 [gr-qc/9409052] [INSPIRE].
M.-I. Park, Symmetry algebras in Chern-Simons theories with boundary: Canonical approach, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 377 [hep-th/9811033] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes, Gauging the Boundary in Field-space, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. B 67 (2019) 89 [arXiv:1902.09258] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes, Holism as the empirical significance of symmetries, Eur. J. Phil. Sci. 11 (2021) 87 [arXiv:1910.05330] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2109.06184
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Carrozza, S., Höhn, P.A. Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2022)172
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2022)172